Quantcast

Commentary

Commentary Page of 18 Commentary Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
1164                                    Journal of Chemical Education                  October, 1926
were rather in the nature of reminders for skilled workers rather than detailed descriptions for purposes of general information. This fact emphasizes the likelihood that this papyrus was a kind of a laboratory note-book of the operations of the chemical arts of the times.
The recipes dealing with metals and alloys are certainly the most numerous. These may be conveniently grouped as follows: The making of alloys, coloring the surfaces of metals, cleaning and purifying metals, and testing metals for purity.
The first of these, the manufacture of alloys, is the subject of the ma­jority of the recipes. And, in nearly all cases the alloy being made is the same one namely, "asem." The word itself referred either to silver, alloys of silver and gold, or in fact to any alloy used in jewelry resembling these. As a matter of fact, the whole viewpoint of the ancients regarding substances was so entirely different from ours that we sometimes forget that they generally failed to distinguish metals, chemically, from each other very clearly and went wholly upon appearances. For example, if two alloys had the same appearance although differing in composi­tion they considered them identical. This is checked further in other cases, notably among the Romans, who applied the same name "aes" to all kinds of copper alloys regardless of composition. In the papyrus most of the recipes are simply straightforward working directions, although in one or two cases there is direct evidence of an intention to deceive. Thus in No. 8 we read, "this will be asem of the first quality, which will deceive even the artisans," showing that there was some recog­nition of chemical differences aside from qualitative appearances. Per­haps the workers of the recipes knew this, but it is certain that this knowl­edge was not general, as the philosophy of the ancients so well informs us. It is these practical recipes and working directions for making alloys from various metals that later became fused with various mystical and philosophical doctrines and so grew into alchemy. Hence, the papyrus is of the highest historical importance chemically in showing the real start­ing point of the alchemical ideas of the transmutation of metals.
As to the practical composition of the alloys themselves, they are seen to vary from simple two-metal combinations to those containing four or five metals. The metals used were gold, silver, tin, copper, lead, mercury, arsenic, antimony, and zinc, the latter ones being used in the form of their compounds and not being distinguished in the metallic state. A curious fact to be noted in the making of these alloys is that in nearly all cases where compounds are employed there is no mention of a reducing agent being employed. Perhaps the furnaces used were operated under reduc­ing conditions or it was understood by the workers that charcoal or wood was to be placed with the metals being fused. The limited range in the type of alloys whose manufacture is described indicates that the owner
Commentary Page of 18 Commentary
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Radcliffe. The Leyden Papyrus.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page