In Memoriam

Copyright © 2022 by Ed Dowd

Foreword copyright © by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Afterword copyright © by Gavin de Becker

All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without the express written consent of the publisher, except in the case of brief excerpts in critical reviews or articles. All inquiries should be addressed to Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018.

Skyhorse Publishing books may be purchased in bulk at special discounts for sales promotion, corporate gifts, fund-raising, or educational purposes. Special editions can also be created to specifications. For details, contact the Special Sales Department, Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018 or info@skyhorsepublishing.com.

Skyhorse® and Skyhorse Publishing® are registered trademarks of Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.®, a Delaware corporation.

Visit our website at www.skyhorsepublishing.com.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available on file.

Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-5107-7639-5

Ebook ISBN: 978-1-5107-7643-2

Cover design by Brian Peterson

Book design by Geoff Towle

Printed in the United States of America

The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.

– Albert Einstein

STUDENT

Dr. Einstein, aren’t these the same questions as last year’s final exam?

DR. EINSTEIN

Yes. But this year the answers are different.

NOTE TO THE READER

You might be inspired to seek out a fact checking site to test or refute some information in this book that’s hard to believe. Fair enough. Before you blindly rely upon corporate fact checkers, however, use the QR code to confirm that the man who started Reuters Fact Check is also on the Board of Pfizer – while simultaneously serving as Chairman of the Reuters Foundation that oversees their fact checking operation. Conflicted and circular relationships like this are common among powerful people; often, such relationships are the way a person became powerful in the first place.

Also confirm that Pharma companies sponsor the overwhelming majority of TV news programs.

Also confirm that the government-funded British Broadcasting Corporation created The Trusted News Initiative (TNI), a coalition of Reuters, The Washington Post, the Canadian and Australian Broadcasting Corporations, the European Broadcasting Union, Associated Press, Google, YouTube, Facebook/Meta, Microsoft and Twitter, all “pledged to work together to tackle harmful misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines.”

TNI member companies censor what they label as misinformation, while promoting and elevating information from the CDC, the WHO and Big Pharma.

QR codes throughout these pages will take you to original source material so that you can confirm each report is real, each statistic well-sourced, each story all too true. Perhaps by the end of this book, you will come to see that much of the information reaching you day to day is carefully crafted by the media. The word media means “in the middle of and between.” Indeed, the news media stands in the middle of and between you and people in power. Only when you know this can you decide for yourself what’s promotion, what’s propaganda, what’s marketing, and what is truth.

If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we’re up for grabs for the next charlatan –political or religious– who comes ambling along.

It wasn’t enough, Jefferson said, to enshrine some rights in a constitution or a bill of rights. The people had to be educated, and they had to practice their skepticism... otherwise, we don’t run the government, the government runs us.

– Carl Sagan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Introduction by the Author

Healthy Young Athletes

First, Is It True?

Died Unexpectedly in Their Sleep

The Sad New Normal

VAERS

Young Medical Practitioners

Famous Young People

For Children – A Smoking Gun

News You Likely Missed

Europe

Disability

Survived Adverse Events

Afterword by Gavin de Becker

Seeing Is Believing

The Compendium

APPENDICES

One – Studies on Sudden Athlete Death

Two – Deaths Shift from Old to Young

Three – Phinance Technologies

Four – Cardiac Injuries to Young People

Five – The Malone Doctrine

Acknowledgments

FOREWORD

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Among the world’s towering financial titans is BlackRock, a company with a bigger economy than every country on Earth except the U.S. and China. They manage $10 trillion in assets. In 2002, BlackRock recruited the brilliant Wall Street careerist Edward Dowd, and soon promoted him to serve as Managing Director. Turns out BlackRock made a very good bet on Ed Dowd: The Growth Fund he managed started at $2 billion; by the time he left BlackRock it was $14 billion.

His work with BlackRock required a keen ability to understand markets, pick stocks, analyze statistics, and identify trends.

In 2021, Dowd found himself withdrawing from Wall Street to study an entirely new kind of trend: the expanding and tragic epidemic of sudden deaths among healthy young people.

Every country dutifully maintains statistics on what’s called All-Cause Mortality – deaths from any cause whatsoever. Whether accidents, disease, suicide, homicide, natural disaster or unexplained deaths, there is a long-established and fairly consistent baseline of All-Cause Mortality, year over year. Anything above that baseline is considered Excess Death. In 2021, it was Ed Dowd –not the public health officials that citizens rely upon– but Dowd who brought international attention to the fact that healthy working-age Americans were dying, and dying suddenly, at an alarming rate not seen before. These excess deaths were not anticipated by insurance actuaries, and weren’t attributed to COVID.

Dowd framed the issue in a way I can’t forget:

“From February 2021 to March 2022, millennials experienced the equivalent of a Vietnam war, with more than 60,000 excess deaths. The Vietnam war took 12 years to kill the same number of healthy young people we’ve just seen die in 12 months.”

One after another, reports from life insurance companies confirmed what Dowd was discovering, and in early 2022, he convened a group of insurance industry executives to explore it further. Later, he recruited expert analysts from around the world, and drawing on data from various official sources in many countries, he and his growing team committed to study the topic from every available vantage point.

In this unusual book, Ed Dowd proves an undeniable and urgent reality, laid out with facts that can be confirmed by any reader, point by point, page by page. He has helped us all understand something that many powerful people want to deny – and would get away with denying were it not for his skills and integrity.

Anyone who appreciates truth and accuracy owes Ed Dowd their gratitude. He certainly has mine.

RFK, Jr.

INTRODUCTION

In early 2021, I started hearing alarming and unusual stories of young, exceptionally fit athletes dropping dead on the field of play. If those who are the healthiest among us are suddenly dying, what would that mean for the rest of the population? In other words, what if healthy young athletes are the canary in the coalmine? To my trained eye, what others might consider sad anecdotes became something more: A trend change was underway.

Success during my career came during those times I was able to identify trend changes before they were apparent to my peers and the financial press.

Using similar skills, I can look at today’s health and death statistics and see that something isn’t right. To be more specific, something about All-Cause Mortality and the excess death rate isn’t right. Determining All-Cause Mortality is not controversial. It’s just math. And it’s the kind of math that insurance actuaries obsess, for understandable professional reasons. They scrutinize total deaths by age group, by ethnicity, by region, by year, even day to day. They studiously compare month-to-month and year-to-year stats, searching for trends. Usually, the rate of deaths is fairly consistent. For example, in 1933 about 1.4 million Americans died from all causes. In 1955, about 1.5 million Americans died from all causes, and about the same number again in 1956.

By 2017, around 2.8 million Americans died. 2018 was about the same again. 2019, about the same again. Not surprisingly, 2020 saw a spike, smaller than you might imagine, some of which could be attributed to COVID and to initial treatment strategies that were not effective.

But then, in 2021, the stats people expected went off the rails. The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID.

A 40% increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking, and not only for the devastated families and communities that directly experience the deaths. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was 40%.

And therein lies a story – a story that starts with obvious questions:

What has caused this historic spike in deaths among younger people?

What has caused the shift from old people, who are expected to die, to younger people, who are expected to keep living?

It isn’t COVID, of course, because we know that COVID is not a significant cause of death in young people.

Various stakeholders will opine about what could be causing this epidemic of unexpected sudden deaths. Though I’ll share my best conclusions, I aim most of all to help you reach your own conclusions. In the coming pages, I won’t ever ask you to rely upon me for anything; all the facts I share will have citations you can quickly confirm. I won’t be expressing mere opinions or making arguments. The facts just are, and the math just is.

Though excess and All-Cause Mortality can be expressed in numbers, I begin this book with the actual human reality behind those numbers. As you see some of the actual people who are represented by the dry term Excess Mortality, it’s difficult to take on board the unexpected sudden deaths of young athletes, known to be the healthiest among us. Similarly, when lots of healthy teenagers and young adults die in their sleep without obvious reason, collapse and die on a family outing, or fall down dead while playing sports, that all by itself raises an immediate public health concern. Or at least it used to.

As you turn the next few pages, ask yourself if you recall seeing these kinds of things occurring during your own life – in junior high? In high school? In college? How many times in your life did you hear of a performer dropping dead on stage in mid-performance? Your own life experience and intuition will tell you that what you’re about to see is not normal.

Or at least it wasn’t normal before 2021.

Ed Dowd

HEALTHY YOUNG ATHLETES...

HEALTHY YOUNG ATHLETES...

Going back to Ancient Greece, young athletes have been championed as the flower of the human race, more celebrated than philosophers, scientists, and artists. When we gather together to watch them perform at the highest level, we share a communal emotion akin to a religious experience. A young athlete’s death has therefore long been perceived as the most difficult to comprehend and come to terms with.

— John Leake

You can hold out as long as you want but you won’t have much freedom. I’m over it, I did it. Does it make me a sheep? No.

— Jake Kazmarek, September 28, 2021

Died Four Days After Second Vaccine.

Never seen anything like it. I played for 17 years. I don’t think I saw one person in 17 years have to come off the football pitch with breathing difficulties, clutching their heart, heart problems. But, in the last year, it’s just been unbelievable how many people, not just footballers, sports people in general – tennis players, cricketers, basketball players, just how many are just keeling over. And at some point, surely you have to say, ‘This isn’t right, this needs to be investigated.’

— Matt Le Tissier, Global Star Footballer

Was a professional for nearly 20 years. From 1996. Played nearly 500 games. Club and international level. Never ever was there one cardiac arrest. Either in the crowd or a player. It’s actually quite scary.

— Gary Dempsey, 2011 Footballer of the Year

Get your double vax and get on with it and learn to live with it.

— Shane Warne, 2021

You’ve just seen a very small sampling of sudden deaths during 2021 / 2022

A sampling of many hundreds more appears in the Compendium on Page 137

FIRST, IS IT TRUE?

FIRST, IS IT TRUE?

Before 2021, none of us had ever seen anything like what you have just seen, and certainly never to this extent. If you were surprised there were so many confirmed news reports about healthy young athletes collapsing and dying in mid-play, please note that what you just saw is only a small sampling. There are many hundreds more of these tragedies confirmed in this book’s Compendium. And the Compendium itself is only a small sampling. And every one of the hundreds of people whose deaths are memorialized at the end of this book died before completing 45 years.

At this point, I ask that only one thing be fully accepted as fact: That these deaths are real, are happening. And don’t focus yet on why.

People and institutions hoping to suppress the information in this book will likely launch a criticism along the lines that looking at these deaths somehow disrespects the families. The exact opposite is true: Ignoring these deaths is the greatest disrespect we could ever show. These young people and their families and communities deserve to have someone care about why they died – particularly when official agencies have closed their eyes (and perhaps their hearts) to such cares.

Every single health official in America knows the obvious: Healthy young people don’t just stop living for no reason. The deaths in this book that happened at professional sports events are doubly unusual because those athletes died despite the immediate on-site presence of emergency medical responders who are trained and equipped to resuscitate people. But since 2021, so many could not be resuscitated; they died on the spot, arrived at the hospital already dead. That is both tragic and highly unusual.

Those seeking to discount the facts in this book might say there have always been cases of professional athletes dying from cardiac arrest during competition. And that’s true. But has it ever been this often? Or so many victims this young?

The most cited study on the topic of sudden death in young athletes was done in 2006 at the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. Experts there looked at sudden cardiac death in athletes under 35-years old, between the years 1966 and 2004.

After a systematic review of the literature, the Lausanne Study determined there had been 1101 such cases – over a period of 38 years. That’s an average of about 29 per year. These days, we’d be grateful to see even a single month with only 29 such events. In fact, since June 2021, there hasn’t been even one month with fewer than 29 such deaths; there were 90 reported in December 2021 alone, and about the same the month after that.

See Appendix One on Page 175 for more than 50 scholarly writings about sudden athlete deaths; none show anything approaching the number publicly reported since 2021.

If you believe athlete deaths have always happened at this rate and that nothing unusual is underway, conduct your own Google search for deaths like these in 2019, ’18, ’17, or any other past years. Try every combination of every search term you can think of (e.g., athlete sudden death, died midgame, young athlete collapsed and died, collapsed on field, suddenly died), and see if you can find even a fraction of what’s occurred since 2021.

Healthy teenagers dying in their sleep – an event like that was beyond rare, which is why most of us lived our whole lives never hearing about such things. Until 2021.

Imagine that two healthy teenage boys are found dead in their beds a few days apart. In both cases, emergency responders knew immediately that resuscitation would be futile. Just days before they died, both had received the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. An autopsy in Connecticut, and another in Michigan confirmed the official cause of death for both boys: Vaccine-induced myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle, swelling of the heart).

When official agencies in two states conclude that COVID vaccines can kill healthy teenagers, wouldn’t that seem to be important national news? But it was barely reported anywhere. Using the QR code, you can confirm right now that this suppressed story is true.

When a sudden death occurs in front of spectators, it’s newsworthy, and will be reported at least in local media outlets. Similarly, when a healthy young famous person dies unexpectedly, it’s likely to be reported by the news media. In the past, such news stories about a young person would keenly focus on answering the glaring question: Why did this person die? But the current protocol in national news is to ignore such details outright. In the rare instances that these deaths are even reported beyond local news outlets, the reports contain phrases most readers have subconsciously come to expect and accept:

Cause of death unknown, died of natural causes, no cause of death has been given, died after a brief illness, officials are still investigating cause of death

No follow-up news stories, no questions from reporters, no curiosity.

But I am curious. I’ve made a career of being curious about trends, early indicators, statistics, demographics, metrics. That’s what I do: draw useful patterns from as many sources of reliable information and data as I can get.

Essentially, my career on Wall Street was to make money for our clients by making the best predictions. Wall Street is mostly comprised of smart, hardworking men and women competing to create impressive returns for their clients. Like any of us, people on Wall Street want proof of concept before acting, and certainly before committing money to some idea. There is a Wall Street saying: “Be early, be right and be loud!” A common problem is that most people are hesitant to go against the grain of consensus; they prefer to ride trends everyone can see. But the big money in stock picking is made by identifying changes in trends before everyone sees them.

Investing huge amounts of money incentivizes a person to be correct, to discern the difference between mere claims and real possibilities. That required me to become a successful ambassador between two worlds: perception and reality.

On Wall Street those who can figure out reality, those who can see the near future before the herd’s perception changes – those people stand to make a lot of money. My brain is wired in this fashion, and I’m applying the same modality to the strange present moment in which public health officials are no longer curious about what causes unexpected death.

In addition to the young athletes I saw dying in 2021, I began to hear stories from friends whose loved ones had died suddenly. (Oddly, I hadn’t heard such stories in 2020 when COVID was raging.) Before we look at the obvious change that occurred in 2021, I want to honor the healthy young people who died in their sleep, and whose deaths official agencies worked hard to ignore.

As you turn the following pages, ask yourself how often this happened while you were growing up. Reality is more persuasive than all the public health officials, Pharma executives and Pharma-sponsored talking heads on the cable news. We’ll get into the statistical sciences in a moment, but likely, you’ll have already realized on your own that something unusual and terrible is happening.

I really believe that is why God gave us two arms—one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.

— White House COVID czar Jha

DIED UNEXPECTEDLY IN THEIR SLEEP...

DIED UNEXPECTEDLY IN THEIR SLEEP...

The first prospective core study with Pfizer vaccine ages 13 to 18 found that a large fraction, nearly half, were asymptomatic of myocarditis. That means a substantial number of young people in fact are sustaining heart damage and they don’t know it, their parents don’t know it, and the first manifestation of heart damage can be cardiac arrest. This can happen on the playing field with exertion—it also can happen during sleep—as well as the development of heart failure later on.

— Dr. Peter McCullough, Leading Cardiologist

You’ve just seen a very small sampling of sudden deaths during 2021 / 2022

A sampling of many hundreds more appears in the Compendium on Page 137

THE SAD NEW NORMAL

THE SAD NEW NORMAL

Before we move to the statistical science, I want to extend my condolences to the many families and their loved ones affected by these terrible losses.

Sudden unexplainable deaths profoundly hurt parents, siblings, extended family, friends and community. We all understand accidents, which are the leading cause of death in the young, but collapsing and suddenly dying on the field or court during sports? I can’t imagine going to my son’s soccer game and watching him collapse dead before he hits the ground… and I’m confident you can’t either. The psychological damage done to these families is deep and tragic; some families are torn apart, marriages end, siblings devastated by the trauma of loss. Rather than sincere investigation, there has been a concerted effort to normalize what we know wasn’t ever before normal.

By April of 2021 I could see and begin to test the most compelling thesis about what was causing the shocking spike in sudden deaths of healthy young people. Trained to observe shifts in trends, it was clear to me that one big change could not be ignored: mass administration of new pharmaceutical products, experimental products using novel technology with only a 28-day clinical trial testing period. Under Operation Warp Speed, these products were quickly deemed “safe and effective” by the FDA. By April 2021, about 50% of eligible Americans had been injected with the new products.

There are simple facts that can be assessed and analyzed. For example, the number of Americans who took the vaccine products in 2021 can be laid alongside an increase in sudden deaths.

In public health, if evidence indicates a connection between a new Pharma product and increased death, our government should STOP promoting and administering the product.

Instead, we saw history’s biggest advertising and propaganda campaign, including the use of mandate and intimidation to force people to take the new products.

I had been here many times before in my stock picking career. The Dotcom bubble had fanatics who proclaimed it a “new paradigm.” I thought they were crazy and parlayed my contrary bet into substantial success. Five years later, the battle cry was “home prices never go down!” and again my teammates and I managed to steer our fund through that fraud, gaining tremendous market share as a result.

In April of 2021 we were all met with a new battle cry: “Safe & Effective!”

But I saw the trend of sudden death where none had been before.

VACCINE MANDATES & ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY

In Spring and Summer of 2021, we all watched President Biden famously declare that we were experiencing “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The CDC, Anthony Fauci’s NIH, and the medical establishment were touting the COVID vaccines as 100% effective against getting or spreading the virus. Though we all hoped for a successful vaccine, these claims were proven false. We all now know that COVID vaccine products do not stop infection, do not stop disease, and most important from a public policy point of view, do not stop transmission.

Simple logic dictates that if you are vaccinated you shouldn’t fear an unvaccinated person. But there was a hysteria pushed by our government that led to mandates for the general public, following the already draconian mandates forced upon hospital workers and first responders in early summer 2021.

Soon, people would need proof of vaccination to use restaurants, gyms, concerts, sporting events, attend college, keep a job, etc. Remember, this was for a virus that had a survival rate of 99.8% and mostly affected old people who were already sick with one or more fatal comorbidities. Though the survival rate isn’t widely reported even today, it was already known right near the start of the pandemic: Most people had a very low risk of death from COVID. Way back in March of 2020, the facts from Italy showed that nearly 100% of deaths attributed to COVID were in people already ill with more than one fatal comorbidity.

If my thesis about the risks of the new vaccine products was right, then All-Cause Mortality would explode when mandates were implemented.

I also formed the professional opinion that these excess deaths would soon show up in insurance company and funeral home results. Insurance companies would incur abnormal losses and funeral home companies would experience growth beyond their expectations.

Through Summer 2021, corporations began their vaccine mandates; Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, two of the most revered investment banks on Wall Street, led the way, announcing vaccine mandates in August 2021. Most of corporate America followed this lead. Then in September, President Biden signed an executive order mandating COVID vaccination for all companies with over 100 employees. The fear campaign by the CDC, NIH and the Biden administration was aided by a complicit news media that’s long been captured by Big Pharma.

The vaccination rate, particularly among working people, rose extremely fast in a short amount of time. I would soon confirm that being employed in 2021 was actually detrimental to your health.

By the fall-winter of 2021 the threatened mandates were implemented by businesses all over America. We all saw the mainstream media demonize the unvaccinated, the effect of which was to tear families and friends apart as many who took the vaccine refused to mingle with the “infectious” unvaccinated. The country was encouraged to forget the traditional understanding of the word vaccine: an intervention that would prevent nearly everyone from getting the infection from an unvaccinated person. Since this vaccine didn’t stop infection or transmission, the old definition of vaccine was becoming less applicable by the day.

As the news reported an alarming number of what they euphemistically called “breakthrough cases,” it soon became so obvious that the CDC decided to quietly change the definition of vaccine. On September 1, 2021, the definition was changed from inoculants that “produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

The definition change turned these new COVID products into therapeutics, not vaccines.

Note: Throughout this book, the word vaccine is used for ease of reading – not because these COVID products are vaccines according to any traditional definition.

The CDC, NIH and even President Biden himself told everyone that if you take the vaccine you are protected from COVID and cannot spread COVID. This is not a little lie; it is one to keep in mind as you view the All-Cause Mortality data in this book.

Unfortunately, perception was woefully far from reality. The mainstream media didn’t bother to mention the definition change, continued to spout “safe and effective,” and continued to demonize the unvaccinated.

As everyone saw that Omicron spread more easily, the perception that the vaccine prevented people from getting COVID was shattered. Literally months after it was obvious to everyone, the corporate mainstream media began to quietly report that the COVID vaccines don’t stop transmission. Still today, many people haven’t absorbed this fact, a fact known to Federal public health officials before mass vaccination even began.

The narrative then shifted from effective to “prevents serious hospitalization and death,” a claim that to this day has never been proven, a claim that is more marketing than science.

With Omicron, nature had accomplished what no amount of logic or reasoning or rational debate could do: It changed perception to match the reality that these vaccines were close to useless. CDC Director Walensky: 4 shots plus the new bivalent booster, and gets COVID. Dr Fauci: 4 shots and gets COVID. Twice. President Biden: 4 shots and gets COVID. Twice. Jill Biden: 4 shots and gets COVID. Twice. Canada’s Prime Minster: Fully boosted and gets COVID. Twice. Even the CEO of Pfizer: Fully vaccinated and gets COVID. Twice.

When President Biden assured Americans “You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations,” people quickly saw that wasn’t accurate. And when President Biden explained his mandate for healthcare workers, he told Americans they could have “certainty” that hospital staffs are “protected from COVID and cannot spread it to you.” But Americans saw first-hand that was false.

Naturally, booster uptake lessened, and unnaturally, the government and their media allies continued to push this vaccine product, as they still do today. Unfortunately, the damage done by this public health disaster was about to show up in the meta data of the CDC and similar agencies worldwide, as well as in insurance company and funeral home earnings reports.

It should be noted that the Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), established decades ago to detect safety signals from vaccine products, was dramatically revealing problems with the vaccines.

Media and government leaders tried to dismiss VAERS out of hand, implying that anti-vaxxers were using it to submit false claims. But VAERS has nearly 1.5 million reports of adverse reactions and deaths associated with the COVID vaccines, most entered by medical professionals, emergency room staff, etc. The idea that significant numbers of these reports are fake is ludicrous. Aside from it being a Federal offense to file a false VAERS report, it’s impenetrably difficult to enter a VAERS report. Doubting readers can try it right now.

Those rare medical professionals who pointed out the reality of vaccine injuries and deaths were demonized as conspiracy theorists and threatened with loss of their jobs and licenses. And though the VAERS data was ignored, the bodies were starting to pile up, and evidence within other databases would soon be impossible to refute.

People with myocarditis are at lifetime increased risk of cardiac complications. This can have profound consequences... typically told to limit activity for several months, sometimes longer. This means no sports. Some kids are told not to carry books to school.

— Dr. Venk Murthy

Johns Hopkins-trained Cardiologist

VAERS

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM

VAERS

From a study of VAERS commissioned by the U.S. Government:

Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of problem drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed...fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

Even with these reporting limitations, there have been more adverse reactions and deaths reported to VAERS for the COVID vaccines than all other vaccines combined, over 32 years.

Thousands of deaths have occurred the day of Covid vaccination, or within one or two days.

1,424,789 Reports Through September 23, 2022

A Sampling from Among Tens of Thousands of VAERS Reports

Bill Gates 2020:

The vaccine key goal is to stop the transmission, to get immunity levels up so that you get almost no infection going on whatsoever.

Bill Gates 2021:

We didn’t get vaccines that stop transmission. We need a new way of doing the vaccines.

YOUNG MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS...

YOUNG MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS...

This would not be the first time if it happened that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse... the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in children which paradoxically made the children worse.* One of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected.

So you can’t just go out there and give it.

— Anthony Fauci on Vaccines March 2022

* 80% of the children given the shot were hospitalized with severe respiratory disease

More Young Canadian Doctors Who Died Suddendly Since March 2021

In the first week of January 2022 OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison made comments to a Commerce meeting that were soon picked up by some media outlets:

“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica. The data is consistent across every player in that business.”

Davison said the increase in deaths represented “huge, huge numbers,” and that it wasn’t elderly people who were dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who were employees of companies with group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”

He added that most of the claims for deaths being filed were not classified as COVID-19 deaths.

At the same time, the company was seeing an “uptick” in disability claims, at first short-term disability, and then a new increase in long-term disability claims.

Seeing this strong corroboration for my concerns, I started to build a team that could carefully study each element of the alarming situation, starting with Josh Stirling, a former #1 ranked Institutional Investor and Wall Street Insurance Analyst who worked for Sanford C. Bernstein Research. Josh Stirling turned our focus on what’s called the loss ratio of the group life and disability divisions of insurance companies. The change was significant because group life is a very stable business that is highly profitable for insurance companies. It’s basically a death benefit and disability offered to mid-level employees when they join a corporation. The death benefit is not a big dollar amount and isn’t expected to be paid out since statistically speaking, working age people don’t die in large numbers; they are healthy and employed with good jobs.

The stunning data we found confirmed what the One America CEO saw in January 2022: The Fourth Quarter results from some of the major insurers saw a range of increase in their loss ratio of between 25% and 45% from the 2019 base line levels. And the losses continued to rise. Many of the CEOs blamed this huge increase on COVID and a strange new term that someone coined: “indirect COVID.”

Disability also saw a marked increase and continues to climb today. Remember, these are working age people who were not as a group much affected by COVID in 2020. After mass vaccination, however, they suddenly experienced a huge uptick in excess mortality. Simple deductive reasoning was clear: The only things that changed from 2020 to 2021 were the mandates and increasing mass vaccination. By all accounts, if the vaccines worked well, deaths and disabilities should have declined – but that’s not what we saw happening.

Josh Stirling next studied the CDC excess mortality data. Though CDC data is poorly managed and expressed (not segmented by age, for example), the chart below is damning.

US data shows excess mortality has not fallen through the pandemic, not even after lockdowns, viral mutation to less severe strains, mass vaccination, herd immunity from prior infection, and advances in COVID treatment.

Drawing upon his own actuarial training and data he was able to collect from CDC’s website, Josh developed pre-COVID excess mortality charts for each age group. What he found was simply stunning:

Millennials (ages 25-44) saw an acceleration of excess mortality into the second half of 2021 to new all-time highs, a stunning 84% above baseline.

Federal public health officials and media had developed ways to ignore and explain away the increase in All-Cause Mortality: It must be more suicides, or overdoses or missed cancer screening during lockdowns.

But the rate of change in Fall 2021 was particularly striking as it coincided with the corporate mandates – and it simply wasn’t statistically possible that suicides, overdoses and deaths from delayed treatment of rapid-onset fatal cancers all spiked in that very same 3-month period. The only thing that had changed was mass vaccination forced upon the millennial generation via government and corporate mandates.

Josh Stirling’s other critical discovery was the mix shift from old to young that occurred from 2020 to 2021 (chart below). Further analysis resulted in another series of revelations: In 2020 there were 126,000 excess deaths under the age of 65, or approximately 21%. In Year 2 of the Pandemic, there were 181,000 excess deaths of people under the age of 65, or approximately 35%. But the millennials saw the most enormous increase: 45%, from 42,000 excess deaths to 61,000 excess deaths.

It would be hard to explain the mix shift in Year 2 of the pandemic as being due to COVID because the mutating strains were already becoming less virulent, and we knew that the virus affected mostly older people with pre-existing fatal comorbidities.

In finance and stock picking, there are two kinds of mix shifts: favorable to earnings and adverse to earnings. A mix shift of deaths from old to young is beyond just adverse; it is tragic. Younger working age folks at peak earnings and societal contribution are dying at a faster rate compared to the older generation. Obviously, this is a terribly adverse mix shift, a group of deaths ignored by the media and Government – in stark contrast to their enthusiastic attention to death tolls in 2020.

How can public health officials explain these absolute increases in deaths among working age Americans? Did the virus suddenly decide to only target younger folks disproportionately? The only thing, and the most dramatic thing that changed in Year 2 was mass vaccination.

FAMOUS YOUNG PEOPLE...

FAMOUS YOUNG PEOPLE...

I will not get the third shot. I will not. Pfizer me once, no shame. Pfizer me twice, shame on Covid. Pfizer me three times, shame on you. You want me to get a third shot? What’s next? A fifth shot? No, thank you.

— Comedian Nick Nemeroff in video he posted

Since I got my vaccine, I have a problem, I have a series of problems. As a result, I can’t train, I can’t play. So now I regret having taken the vaccine, but I couldn’t have known.

— Champion tennis star, Jeremy Chardy

Note: Similar reactions associated with COVID vaccines have been reported to CDC and FDA by the thousands, including hundreds specifically naming Ramsay Hunt Syndrome.

Note: Similar reactions associated with COVID vaccines have been reported to CDC and FDA by the thousands

DIED ON STAGE

THE SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

On August 17, 2022 the Society of Actuaries Research Institute (SOA) published their Group Life COVID 19 Mortality Survey Report.

This report represents approximately 80% of the group life US revenues. In Table 5.7 of their report, you can see there was an event that occurred in the Third Quarter of 2021 (highlighted in red and orange) which confirmed excess mortality of 78% and 100% respectively, for two age groups (25-34 and 35-44). In March we saw 84% excess mortality into Fall 2021, and though we already knew our analysis was solid, here it was verified by SOA. It is undeniably clear that an event occurred in the Third Quarter of 2021, the same period that vaccine mandates were ordered by the Biden Administration, and enforced by corporate America.

Note that our early analysis was based upon the CDC’s All-Cause Mortality Data, whereas the SOA data is from death claims in the Group Life Divisions of insurance companies that were surveyed. This is important because they are two different databases and two different population sets which both show the same excess death rates among millennials (ages 25-44).

Some weeks later, SOA published another report that again makes my case in the clearest terms:

“One of the features of 2021 was that excess mortality was worse for the working ages. We see that the impact on the U.S. population between 15 and 64 was 31.7% worse...”

The obvious explanation for the deaths moving to younger, healthier people is that most of those who were employed and insured were forced by mandate to take an experimental vaccine product to maintain their employment, even if they were hesitant, or had a medical or religious objection. And those who were unemployed, self-employed or retired had a choice!

Note: Readers interested in a much deeper dive into the shift of deaths from older to younger, including a full analysis of the extensive underlying data, are directed to Appendix Two, Page 182.

GLOBAL COVID DEATHS:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (CRC) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) track and analyze COVID data worldwide, coordinating with researchers and faculty from schools of Medicine, Public Health, Nursing, and Engineering.

The chart you’ll see next represents CSSE’s assessment of daily COVID deaths worldwide, from the beginning of the pandemic up to the point that the 20 largest countries had all administered one or two doses (March 2022).

Dear Public Health Officials: With 68% of the world’s population vaccinated and 13-billion doses administered, if the vaccines are safe and effective, how do you explain that the overwhelming number of COVID deaths –and all the highest peaks in deaths– occurred after commencement of mass vaccination?

This next chart shows the progress of mass vaccination in the world’s 20 most populous countries up to March 2022. Countries above the 100-mark had administered more than one dose to some or all of their citizens. Countries above the 200-mark had administered more than two doses.

BRITAIN’S OFFICE OF NATIONAL STATISTICS:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

As more media outlets reported my thesis that the new vaccine products were causing a spike in excess deaths, impressive experts from around the world volunteered to test my conclusions. What you sometimes find in finance are people willing to give a clear-eyed look at reality, including unpopular reality that others aren’t yet willing to consider.

Among the key experts who joined our analysis group is Carlos Alegria, a physicist who turned to quantitative finance (and has a PhD in both). Well known in the European hedge fund community, Carlos was recruited for stints with the prestigious firms Winton Capital Management and Mansard Capital.

Carlos wrote the book Economic Cycles, Debt, Demographics: The Underlying Macroeconomic Forces that Will Shape the Coming Decades. As the title implies, he is a master at making sense of large datasets, and also a person willing to look around the corner no matter what’s waiting there. That was about to be tested.

There is no evidence right now that healthy children or healthy adolescents need boosters – no evidence at all.

— Chief Scientist World Health Organization, Soumya Swaminathan

Offit told me that getting boosted would not be worth the risk for the average healthy 17-year-old boy. Offit advised his own son, who is in his 20s, against getting a third dose.

— The Atlantic Magazine Interview

Dr. Paul Offit, longtime CDC advisor

FOR CHILDREN: A SMOKING GUN

FOR CHILDREN: A SMOKING GUN

As we turned our attention to children, another PhD physicist joined us: Yuri Nunes. I first met Carlos and Yuri when we began to explore forming the hedge fund company, Phinance Technologies (See Appendix Three, Page 188). They immediately offered to help assist the research I was already doing on excess All-Cause Mortality. Carlos and Yuri set out to study the excess death data from the UK’s Office of National Statistics (ONS) to detect any illuminating trends in deaths during 2020, 2021 and 2022.

When they analyzed the stats for children ages 1-14, their findings were stunning.

In addition to breaking down the data by age group, the physicists obtained vaccine uptake data. The next chart is 2020 excess deaths in the UK for ages 1 to 65. The first 12 weeks of the year represent the pre- pandemic period; not surprisingly, it shows zero excess deaths in all age groups.

Weeks 13-17 show the effect of the first COVID peak (original variant) in March-April, and the effect of the first pandemic lockdowns undertaken to “flatten the curve.” We see a rise in excess deaths in some age groups but a decline in excess deaths for children 1-14 years old. When excess deaths in the post-lockdown summer period stabilize for the older age groups, they continue to trend downward for children. Stay with me.

When excess deaths for older people rise in October, November, December, deaths among children continue to decline, which is easily explained by two solidly established facts: First, COVID does not affect this age group from a mortality standpoint, so deaths of children had no reason to go up. And second, since the most common cause of death in this age group has always been accidents, the fact of lockdowns, school closures, remote schooling and a general curtailment of activity meant fewer opportunities for children to die in accidents. The next chart shows deaths of children continuing to decline.

The next chart is excess UK deaths for ages 1-14, 15-44 and 45-65 in 2021 – and here we see something startling: While the 2020 chart above reflects the period of excess deaths attributed to COVID (where we saw declining excess deaths among children), the 2021 chart includes the period after vaccination.

The arrows illustrate when mass vaccination commenced for each age-group. Remember, mass vaccination was phased by age, starting around week 13 for the 45-64 age group, week 18 for the 15-44 age group, and week 33 for children, starting with the 12-15 age cohort.

Notice that after vaccination of the age groups 15-44 and 45-65, the slope (rate of change) of both lines begins to rise. That’s quite odd given that the Delta and Omicron strains are less virulent than the earlier strains, and given the widely promoted idea that the vaccines were “safe and effective.” If safe and effective were the reality, then the slopes of the older lines should be falling and heading towards zero – not heading to new highs.

Notice how excess deaths continue to trend downward even after pandemic restrictions were lifted in Spring and Summer 2021. Next, notice with the introduction of the first dose of COVID vaccines for age group 12-15, there is a trending rise in excess deaths. If you have a supportable theory other than the commencement of vaccination, a theory to explain that tragic trend, please let the world know about it.

The most stunning thing in the next chart is that mortality continues to rise throughout the year for all age groups during the least virulent variant (Omicron), during what should have been the end of the COVID Pandemic.

Deductive reasoning calls out to us clearly: The sad trend is associated with the vaccination, especially for children.

No credible person would try to argue that Omicron, the mildest strain, had suddenly decided to target children. Those who want to argue an increase in accidental deaths among children will find the actual culprits are labeled “Other” and “Cause Unknown.”

We were not the only people on Earth to observe these alarming and tragic trends. On September 8, 2022, the UK Government stopped offering COVID vaccines to children under 12.

The UK Government also warned against use of Covid vaccines for pregnant women:

“It is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.”

And yet, at the time of this writing, the United States, unlike many other major countries, still promotes, encourages, and mandates these experimental vaccines for pregnant women, and for all age groups – literally down to six months old. From the CDC website at the time of printing:

“COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 6 months and older. This includes people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.”

So, the UK Government says they can’t assert the vaccines are safe for pregnant women, and warns in the clearest terms that women who are breastfeeding should not be vaccinated, while our CDC recommends the vaccines, and throws some fear into the mix as well, warning that if you catch COVID during pregnancy (which Covid vaccines won’t prevent anyway), “...you are at increased risk of complications that can affect your pregnancy and developing baby.”

DENMARK STOPS COVID VACCINE FOR THOSE UNDER 50:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

A month after the UK stopped offering COVID vaccines to children under 12, Denmark’s health officials went even further and ended mass vaccination for everyone under 50. (They had long before stopped recommending the vaccine for people under 18.)

From the Danish Government website:

“The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with COVID-19, and people under 50 are therefore currently not being offered booster vaccination.”

“In addition, younger people aged under 50 are well protected against becoming severely ill from COVID-19, as a very large number of them have already been vaccinated and have previously been infected with COVID-19, and there is consequently good immunity among this group.”

Several interesting points to note: First, the public was initially told—stridently and repeatedly—that the vaccines prevented infection and transmission. Then Denmark makes a statement that would have seemed ridiculous if said about any previous vaccine: “The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with COVID-19,” admitting in Orwellian doublespeak that what they promoted about the vaccines had been false. (Same for many other governments, including the US.)

The newer untruth they promote is that the vaccine prevents severe illness and death, an unprovable myth also pushed by the US Government and Big Pharma. But there is no data to credibly support the claim, as all the fully vaccinated people whose deaths are attributed to COVID would tell you – if they could.

The second interesting point in the Denmark statement is implied: They are now saying it is better for young people to get infected with COVID than take the experimental shots. The Danish health authorities clearly see something about the vaccines that they are not overtly sharing with the public.

Indeed, Danish politicians and officials have plenty they’d want to keep out of public awareness. After making Denmark one of the world’s most vaccinated countries, the data is grim:

As you’re seeing, excess deaths are on the rise after mass vaccination, for all ages. If vaccines were safe and effective, why would Denmark see its trend in excess deaths get (way) worse, and at just the time COVID variants became less deadly?

Notice also that in 2022, young people 15-24 have the highest death rate of any group. It can’t be that COVID has suddenly become deadly to teenagers, because if that were case, why ever would the Danish Government have just stopped vaccination for the young?

The Danish authorities are stopping the vaccine for people under 50 because they see this same alarming data you’re seeing in these pages. Undeniably, something new is causing excess deaths amongst the young. Though admitting mass vaccination is the culprit would be very difficult for any government, it would be the truth.

On Wall Street, we’d call Denmark’s recent decisions a tell, or a tone change. During my career, whenever I interviewed CEOs or studied corporate press releases, they never came out and said, “Hey guys, our growth is slowing and next year’s earnings are going to drop.” Instead, they hope and pray nobody notices as they sell their own stock before the unwelcome news hits.

So, when we see a huge tone change by the Danish Government, what they are actually communicating is that the vaccine doesn’t work, kills some people – and they know it.

Physicists Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes did an excellent and cogent analysis of Denmark’s death rate trends. Speaking generally, death rates in every developed country had been coming down in the past decade, likely due to advances in technology, medicine, and safety. But in both of the next charts, the favorable historical trend is broken, with the blue lines showing a new and unfavorable trend.

How does Denmark look from a total population standpoint? Sadly, it looks like an epic train wreck: Excess death has gone up each year since mass vaccination began. In these graphs, you see the Danish healthcare system going backwards – and you don’t need any government authority to explain this data to you.

NEWS YOU LIKELY MISSED...

NEWS YOU LIKELY MISSED...

The government-funded British Broadcasting Corporation established and runs this very active coalition of major companies that have “pledged to work together to tackle harmful misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines.”

A key member of TNI is James Smith, former CEO of the Reuters news agency, current Chairman of the Reuters Foundation that oversees Reuters Fact Check, and... current member of Pfizer’s Board of Directors.

News stories that call attention to unexplained sudden deaths among young vaccinated people are clearly bad for Pfizer, and bad for those encouraging mass vaccination. TNI companies work hard to eliminate and limit such stories, while promoting information from government agencies and Pharma.

False Statistical Modeling Used to Change Our World

2001: Neil Ferguson, a modeler at Imperial College London predicted 150,000 people would die from foot and mouth disease

Actual number of deaths: 200

2002: Neil Ferguson predicted up to 156,000 deaths in the UK from Mad Cow Disease

Actual number of deaths: 177

2005: Neil Ferguson predicted that up to 200 million would die from bird flu

Actual number of deaths: 282 (over 6 years)

2009: Neil Ferguson predicted that swine flu would kill 65,000 in the UK

Actual number of deaths: 45

2020: Neil Ferguson predicted up to 179,000 COVID deaths in Taiwan in the first full year of pandemic

Actual number of deaths: 10

Despite decades of dramatic and persistent failures, Neil Ferguson’s prediction that as many as 2-million Americans would die from COVID in 2020 was used to justify lockdowns, school closures, social distancing, and all that followed.

(These same failed models are used to support claims that many millions of lives have been saved by COVID vaccines.)

It is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time... women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.

— UK Government Report, August 2022

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 6 months and older. This includes people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.

— US Government CDC, October 2022

There is a genuine risk that the time of death will be brought forward and the patient will suffer adverse reactions to the vaccine. It may often be better not to vaccinate.

— Norway Government Report on Nursing Home Residents

While the Norway Government urged caution, Canada (and the US) required COVID vaccines for all nursing home patients

Anthony Fauci on New Vaccines, 1999

If you take it and then a year goes by and everybody’s fine, then you say, ‘Okay, that’s good, now let’s give it to five hundred people.’ And then a year goes by and everything’s fine, so you say, ‘Well then now let’s give it to thousands of people.’ And then you find out that it takes 12 years for all hell to break loose. And then what have you done?

THE EUROPEAN STATISTICAL OFFICE:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

Denmark provided us with a valuable case study, but it’s hardly the only European country with an excess death problem. Recent analysis of Austria, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium and France all reveal their excess deaths occurring in the same two phases:

1. The COVID Pandemic

2. Mass vaccination

After mass vaccination, death rates of working-age people increased in every one of these countries. I challenge anyone to find a virologist who’d suggest that a virus would switch to targeting the younger healthier population in the second year of a pandemic. (Clearly, the Danish Government didn’t think so when they ended mass vaccination for everyone under 50.)

Looking at this next chart, it is undeniable that something happened to increase deaths in 2021 and 2022, something new, something that wasn’t an influencing factor in 2020.

As people search to explain the spike in deaths, particularly people unwilling to imagine or even contemplate that mass administration of a brand new pharmaceutical product could be the culprit, the typical explanations proposed include drug overdoses, suicides, delayed diagnosis of other diseases, and missed screenings of rapidly-fatal cancers. These ideas, whether alone or in combination, have not been borne out to explain the sad excess mortality. In any event, these ideas cannot explain the glaring temporal reality: In Summer and Fall 2021, using America as an example, there was an 84% spike in excess deaths among the youngest working people (25 - 44), and that spike immediately followed the massive vaccine mandate.

For deaths to spike in any or all of the proposed categories within that exact same time period for any reason other than mass vaccination is statistically impossible. We know that hundreds of millions of doses were administered, and there is no other factor that affected nearly all working-age people simultaneously.

Next, again using the US as an example, the SOA report shows that the healthiest population (working age Americans) experienced an excess death rate 8% higher than the general US population. And note that the general population is far less healthy than working Americans. Since the intellectually lazy reasons proposed (suicide, delayed medical care, etc) cannot be responsible for these eye-popping increases all happening at the same time, there is an urgent question being ignored every day by public health officials: What is causing this new and tragic loss of life among young working-age people?

TWO PANDEMICS

Year 1: COVID

Year 2: Vaccines

Recall when President Biden proclaimed “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Turns out he was exactly, precisely, literally 100% wrong. Politicians love catchphrases; in this case the accurate one would be “Pandemic of the Vaccinated.”

Europe and America currently have a second pandemic far worse than the first, because its numbers are worse, and also because its victims are healthy young people who would not otherwise have died.

The next chart shows excess death rates for young working people in eight European countries, focusing first on the period during which mass vaccination commenced, and then the same 3-month period a year later, after millions more were vaccinated and boosted.

The year-over-year comparisons show that all these countries experienced more than their usual death rates after mass vaccination commenced. And seven of the eight countries experienced substantial jumps in excess deaths; as vaccination continued and increased, their rate of excess deaths also trended upward.

Given that COVID is now less virulent than it was at the start of vaccination, all countries’ death rates should be trending back towards zero excess death. Also, vaccination rates are now much higher than in 2021, so if “safe and effective” is true, death rates should be plummeting, not increasing. But they continue to rise. Again (and again), logic and deductive reasoning indicate that mass vaccination is the often-deadly culprit for some otherwise healthy people in the prime of their lives.

Note: For an excellent in-depth report on how Excess Death rates are computed:

DISABILITY

HIGHEST-EVER DISABILITY RATES IN AMERICA

Esteemed expert Dr. Jessica Rose has done extensive analysis of the US Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Commenting on the devastating disabilities she has seen, Dr. Rose has said, “Although death is the most extreme adverse event, there are some things that might actually be worse than death.” Before I dive into the disability data, let’s look with compassion at those who have suffered from serious adverse events that didn’t end in death.

SURVIVED ADVERSE EVENTS...

SURVIVED ADVERSE EVENTS...

The CDC director last year said if we vaccinate a million children, there might be 30 or 40 cases of mild myocarditis. And they said, if you get myocarditis from COVID, that’s worse or happens at a higher rate. But that’s not true. The studies have come out. Europe reacted by banning the Moderna vaccine altogether in young people, in many parts of Europe and everybody under 30. We’re now learning that there’s significant heart damage, 31% of people having physical activity restrictions. 63% of children after myocarditis had evidence of heart swelling months down the road on MRI. So we were playing with fire.

— Dr Marty Makary, Johns Hopkins University

US BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS:

Another Independent Source Confirms Our Thesis

We all know intuitively that healthy working people don’t suddenly experience life-altering physical disabilities without accidents or injury involved. The kinds of stories you’ve just seen were not part of my young adulthood experience, and it’s easy to discern that something changed in 2021. That was dramatically affirmed (I should say reaffirmed) when Josh Stirling and I discovered an important database collected by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Every month, the Department of Labor conducts thousands of household surveys asking questions that relate to disability. This is a real-time survey in which respondents report if they themselves are disabled or if someone in the household is disabled. Importantly, these statistics are independent of things like medical claims or doctors’ notes, thus giving an exceptionally clear and up-to-the-moment picture of the disability trend in the US. Also important: The data is independent of the Pharma-captured public health establishment.

Prior to mass vaccination, the run rate was about 29-30 million disabled Americans of working age, give or take, for the last five years. Since mass vaccination commenced in 2021, the number of disabled Americans has increased to almost 33 million. That means nearly 3.5 million more Americans of working age are now too disabled to work.

Several of the charts that follow come from a study done by Carlos and Yuri at the end of July 2022.

That chart paints a picture worth a thousand words. One sees that the year-over-year rate of change oscillated around a steady average going back to 2008, and then accelerates dramatically in May of 2021. For math geeks, that’s a stunning 3 standard deviation event.

On the next chart (published by another independent source, the Federal Reserve Bank), anyone can see the sharp rise in disabilities well above the 5-year average.

The trend on the next chart is equally grim: You see that the current disability rate has not only increased 6.6% over the historical average disability rate, but it’s reached a higher level than at any time in at least 15 years.

The next chart shows the employed population by different ages. Focus on the black line, which reflects ages 16-64, a cohort we know (used) to be healthier than the overall US population.

The next chart shows that working women in America are faring much worse than men (13% worse than men).

The bottom line revealed in the charts you’ve just seen is that the healthier employed folks experienced a greater increase in rate of disability (22.6% increase) than the comparable total US population (6.6% increase). Obvious question of the day: Why are healthier folks seeing a bigger increase in the rate of their disabilities starting around May of 2021? What else was increasing at a substantial rate in mid-2021? Mass vaccination. If you have credible data that points to something else that will explain all of what you’ve seen here, please let the world know about it.

In the meantime, the disability crisis has knock on effects throughout our economy – and everyone who has seen Help Wanted signs at businesses knows this first-hand. You can’t simply eliminate millions of workers without profound consequences.

This is a short book precisely because it’s tightly focused on just a few important topics. I have provided several vantage points from which to look at the undeniable increase in deaths among the young. I avoided reliance upon any one source, or any one idea. Rather, I checked indicators and trends of different types, from various sources, and one after another, source after source, the results of analysis are complimentary, meaning they point in the same direction.

Any reader can confirm that 1) Healthy young people have been dying and becoming disabled with alarming frequency; and 2) The rate of these tragedies is new and unusual, and not sufficiently explained by government officials; and 3) Glaring public health questions are not being asked or answered by those in power.

Curious readers who are satisfied that these three conclusions are factual reality will naturally want to know why events have unfolded as they have. I’ve carefully avoided expressing opinions and theories, and have explored these disturbing topics by the numbers, literally. Of course, we all have opinions and theories about our new world, and I’m no different. But: I made a conscious decision to stay away from theorizing about why and who. Being loyal to that commitment, there are just a few observations I’d like to express:

At this point, public health officials and vaccine makers are aware of everything that you now know from this book – at a minimum. At this point, they have moved beyond something we could write off as incompetence, in that they are allowing (and even forcing) mass use of products they know are harmful. At this point, powerful people in public health and Pharma are in full cover-up mode. They almost have to be, because it’s hard to imagine how they could pivot from what they’ve done to what they ought to do.

At this point, the negligence is criminal.

Ed Dowd

AFTERWORD

AFTERWORD

by Gavin de Becker

Bestselling Author, The Gift of Fear

A quick thought experiment:

Imagine that thousands of healthy young Americans died suddenly, unexpectedly, mysteriously – and then kept dying at an alarming and escalating rate. (Once upon a time), that would trigger an urgent CDC inquiry to determine the cause of the deaths. Imagine attentive and curious public health officials discover the decedents had all repeatedly ingested a new and little-understood drug. Next, the officials determine to a certainty that the drug these kids took has a clear mechanism of action for causing inflammation of the heart and other cardiac injuries in some people. They learn that public health officials in other countries have seen the same thing and stopped recommending this same drug to young people. Next, some of the most senior and revered scientific advisors to the US Government publicly recommend the drug be stopped for young people. Finally, thousands of doctors around the world sign petitions and write op-eds opposing the drug for young people. Experts from Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, and Oxford universities come forward to voice their concerns.

Alas, that thought experiment doesn’t require any imagination, because it’s exactly what’s occurred – except for the part about attentive and curious CDC officials rushing in to inquire. That part I had to make up.

In the pre-COVID world, wouldn’t inquisitive reporters chase such a story, and wouldn’t the FDA pause administration of the new mystery drug until a comprehensive inquiry was complete? And above all, wouldn’t such a drug have quickly become a leading suspect worth considering for its possible role in the deaths?

Somehow, those have become rhetorical questions.

But not to Edward Dowd. His pioneering exploration of these sad sudden deaths was months ahead of the Wall Street Journal story about a lethal conundrum facing insurance companies. Apparently, as mass vaccination progressed in 2021, excess death claims in working-age Americans tripled. Given the temporal relationship, might there be a connection between vaccines and these deaths? Apparently not, because the WSJ story didn’t even mention mass vaccination among the causes worth considering:

1. Delayed medical treatment from 2020

2. People’s fear of seeking treatment

3. Trouble lining up appointments

4. Drug abuse and other societal troubles

5. People not taking care of themselves

6. Long COVID

7. Not-yet-known long-term effects of COVID

8. People dying later “from the toll COVID has taken on their bodies”

Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are all subsets of the same concept: impact of lockdowns and fear. Numbers 6, 7, and 8 are all subsets of the same concept: the impact of COVID illness.

Aside from drug abuse and trouble getting doctors’ appointments, did anything else happen in 2021 that might possibly-maybe-perhaps-call-me-crazy be worth considering?

The insurers attributed most of the 2021 excess deaths to heart and circulatory issues, neurological disorders, and stroke. It’s a coincidence, apparently, that nearly all of their deceased customers had just been injected with something known to cause heart and circulatory issues, neurological disorders, and stroke. Head-scratching by insurance industry CEOs and experts interviewed for the WSJ article was understandable, because, you know, how in the world could deaths possibly be linked to some brand new, never-before-used drug that was minimally tested, maximally rushed, mass-administered, and oh yeah, and by the way, is known to cause the very medical issues their customers were dying of?

(If you have any doubt as to whether the mRNA vaccines cause cardiac problems, see Appendix Four, Page 190, for a sampling of 100 published papers on vaccine-induced cardiac injuries to young people.)

Please forgive three more rhetorical questions:

- Don’t Americans have plenty of excellent reasons to distrust Big Pharma companies?

- Doesn’t it seem Pharma is being afforded the kind of trust previously reserved for companies that didn’t commit lethal criminal fraud against their fellow citizens?

- What’s up with that?

Some relevant recent history: In 2021, a jury convicted Elizabeth Holmes of medical fraud. During the trial, she admitted that her company conducted medical tests using the same old machines that were supposedly being replaced by her remarkable new technology.

Though people were given fraudulent and incorrect medical results, the news media’s fawning over Holmes and Theranos kept the fraud alive for years, such that the company was eventually valued at $9 billion. Not a typo.

Theranos would not have been possible if the news media were skeptical or even curious when it comes to medicine and medical technology. As you scan these few examples of news media promotion, consider that Vioxx and opioids and COVID vaccines were all similarly floated into our society on a soft cushion of media praise, free of scrutiny or skepticism.

USA Today:

Elizabeth Holmes is tall, smart and single. Well, maybe not truly single. “I guess you should say I’m married to Theranos,” Holmes says with a laugh. Only she’s not kidding... while Holmes is a billionaire on paper, nothing seems to interest her less... “We’re successful if person by person we help make a difference in their lives,” says Holmes, who has a soft yet commanding voice that makes a listener lean in as if waiting for marching orders.

New Yorker:

Although she can quote Jane Austen by heart, she no longer devotes time to novels or friends, doesn’t date, doesn’t own a television, and hasn’t taken a vacation in ten years… “I have done something, and we have done something, that has changed people’s lives... I would much rather live a life of purpose than one in which I might have other things but not that.”

CNN:

The company she founded has the potential to change health care for millions of Americans.

Forbes:

Elizabeth Holmes, 30, is the youngest woman to become a self-made billionaire – and she’s done so four times over. “What we’re about is the belief that access to affordable and real-time health information is a basic human right, and it’s a civil right,” she says.

Since the news media couldn’t hardly change course after all that worship, it wasn’t any journalist who undid the Theranos scam. It was Stanford professor John Ioannidis who was willing to publicly point out that Theranos hadn’t published any peer-reviewed research about their products.

(To bring us to the present moment for a moment, that same John Ioannidis, esteemed physician, scientist and epidemiologist, was among the first and most vocal critics of lockdown policies. For that, he’s been the target of excoriation and cancellation by news media and the medical/Pharma cabal. Don’t you dare wake us from our COVID fever dream, Professor!)

Back to Theranos: The company attempted to boost its credibility by getting then-Vice President Biden to visit their facility. In order to conceal the lab’s true operating conditions, Holmes and her team created a fake lab for the Vice President to tour.

The Theranos case should remind us that 25% of drugs approved by the FDA are later pulled from the market – so they can’t all be miracle drugs. Still, whatever a public health bureaucrat says today, the news media repeats, defends, and then enshrines as fact. Never has their lack of skepticism and curiosity about their biggest sponsors been on such colorful display as during the last two years, during which they’ve constantly promoted and parroted false Pharma claims related to new vaccines, false claims about the new Pfizer COVID treatment, false claims about Ivermectin, and every other false claim by Pharma and government. Real journalism being MIA has left us helplessly living in a world of compliance rather than science.

Here’s a fast journey through some intentionally forgotten history: After the FDA approved Vioxx, there were many litigations related to the inconvenient fact that the drug doubled the risk of heart attack. How many litigations? Oh... 27,000 of them, but who’s counting? Risk of heart attack sounds familiar, given that hundreds of studies have now found mRNA vaccines increase the risk of cardiac death in young males. But again, who’s counting?

Merck was eventually forced to withdraw Vioxx, and was ordered to pay criminal fines of almost a billion dollars for overstating the drug’s safety with a now familiar refrain: “safe and effective.”

Like today, when CDC and FDA are receiving hundreds of thousands of reports of adverse reactions to COVID vaccines (e.g. myocarditis, stroke, blood clots, death), Merck told jury after jury that heart attack deaths had nothing whatsoever to do with their wonder-drug. They fought lawsuits like... well, like a Pharma company, accusing plaintiffs of falsifying data. Pot/kettle.

When a jury awarded one widow $253 million, Merck appealed, and that award was overturned. A bunch of other lawsuits followed, with Merck winning some, losing some – until a class-action lawsuit concluded that Merck had violated the law by selling a drug that was unfit for sale, because of, you know, doubling the risk of heart attack, or some such thing. And then...

Merck agreed to a mass tort settlement of $4.85 billion to end thousands of individual lawsuits. And then...

Merck announced a settlement with the US Attorney’s Office, resolving the $950 million fine that had been levied against the company.

Did that end it? Nope, litigation with seven states remains outstanding today. But the real punchline is...

Vioxx is returning to market. Yes. We can look forward to breathless news media reports about another (likely renamed) wonder-drug that’s safe and effective.

The story of Vioxx is not a cautionary tale; rather, it’s a regular event. A group of concerned scientists wrote about it in 2017:

To increase the likelihood of FDA approval for Vioxx, the pharmaceutical giant Merck used flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results to exaggerate the drug’s positive effects.

You mean exactly like every other Big Pharma company does with every other drug?

Merck’s manipulation also included a pattern of ghostwriting scientific articles. Internal documents reveal that in 16 of 20 papers reporting on clinical trials of Vioxx, a Merck employee was initially listed as the lead author of the first draft.

You mean like every other Big Pharma company does with every other drug?

An FDA insider testifying on the agency’s failure to quickly recall Vioxx said it was the equivalent of allowing “two to four jumbo jetliners” to crash every week for five years.

The jumbo jetliner analogy is relevant again today, and action by the FDA seems nowhere in sight.

What Ed Dowd has done in this book encourages us to bring our own curiosity and skepticism to the present unprecedented moment, in which new and little-tested Pharma products are being injected into the majority of people on Earth, billions of doses thus far, another 4-million each day, evermore including children, even infants, authorized by an FDA that tried hard to keep Pfizer’s clinical trials data secret from the public. To be more accurate, the FDA was perfectly willing and happy to release the information to the public, only they asked for 55-years to do so. To be even more accurate, the FDA (joined by its partner, Pfizer) later petitioned the Court to allow them 75-years to disclose all the information.

Does the fact that the FDA fought so hard to keep the Pfizer safety results secret from the public make you curious?

Well, don’t expect any answers from the FDA, now run by a man named Robert Califf. Due to his Big Pharma conflicts, Califf would be ineligible to even serve on an FDA advisory committee, but he is nonetheless the Commissioner, on his third tour of duty at the FDA because, well, the revolving door spins fast, and so does he.

Califf presided over FDA approval of Oxycodone use in children as young as 11, and high-dose hydrocodone drugs, and also the drug Addyl that was later recalled, among several others. For each of these approvals, the FDA overrode its own advisory committee of experts, and Califf gave his approval.

Califf founded a group to do clinical trials, and more than half of his $230 million funding came from... Big Pharma. Almost done. Califf was also paid as a consultant by the 15 biggest Pharma companies. And finally, sure, he was a cheerleader for Vioxx.

So of course he’s Commissioner of the FDA.

And don’t expect much curiosity or skepticism from CDC Director Rochelle Walensky either. Here she is in March of 2022, displaying her willful gullibility about Pharma claims:

“I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful, so many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right, now we’re done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way. I really do. I think all of us wanted this to be done.”

“Nobody said waning, when you know, oh this vaccine’s going to work. Oh well, maybe it’ll wear [laughs], it’ll wear off.”

“Nobody said what if... [the vaccine is] not as potent against the next variant.”

She couldn’t predict that vaccines might be less effective against new variants? You mean, like the flu vaccine has done every year for decades?

She couldn’t predict that the vaccine would wane, like the flu vaccine has done every year for decades, like even measles vaccines, and tetanus vaccines?

Dr Walensky was once Chief of Infectious Diseases at a hospital where I’d never want to be a patient if she is Chief of Infectious Diseases. But who am I kidding, she’s not going back to that hospital; she’s more likely to join Pfizer’s Board of Directors. Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb is already there waiting for her.

Dr. Walensky’s catchphrase, “Too little caution and too much optimism,” could be a lyric in CDC’s most famous song, Safe and Effective.

To better understand how the agency always concludes that every vaccine is safe and effective, consider a vaccine so old that all its risk factors are already known: the smallpox vaccine.

From the CDC website, this morning:

The smallpox vaccine is safe, and it is effective at preventing smallpox disease.

Let’s see what safe means to the CDC:

Serious Side Effects of Smallpox Vaccine

- Heart problems

- Swelling of the brain or spinal cord

- Severe skin diseases

- Spreading the virus to other parts of the body or to another person [huh?]

- Severe allergic reaction after vaccination

- Accidental infection of the eye (which may cause swelling of the cornea causing scarring of the cornea, and blindness)

The risks for serious smallpox vaccine side effects are greater for:

- People with any three of the following risk factors for heart disease: high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes

- People with heart or blood vessel problems, including angina, previous heart attack or other cardiac problems

- People with skin problems, such as eczema

- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

That’s going to be a lot of people risking brain swelling, heart problems and blindness, given that millions of Americans have had heart attacks “or other cardiac problems,” 17 million Americans are pregnant or breastfeeding, 31 million have eczema, 34 million have diabetes, 76 million have high cholesterol, and 109 million have high blood pressure.

Describing the people at risk of serious side effects from the safe and effective smallpox vaccine, CDC includes people with a “family history of heart problems.”

Do you know hardly anyone who doesn’t fit that category?

So, while the CDC definitively states “The smallpox vaccine is safe,” they then exclude the majority of Americans it might be safe for.

Clearly, the term safe means different things to different experts. Here, for example, is the Mayo Clinic’s view of the exact same vaccine the CDC calls safe:

“It can sometimes cause serious side effects, such as infections in the heart or brain. That’s why the vaccine is not given to everyone. Unless there is a smallpox outbreak, the risks of the vaccine outweigh the benefits for most people.”

But Gavin, since there’s no outbreak of smallpox, why worry about what’s on the CDC website? Because... wait for it... the CDC is right now actively promoting that same smallpox vaccine to prevent monkeypox, and nearly a million Americans have already had the pleasure. (I guess it’s people with no family history of heart problems.)

And why have just one smallpox vaccine when you can have two?

You now know that when CDC says “safe and effective,” that’s because CDC never met a vaccine they didn’t like. It’s a belief system – not science.

Carefully reading Ed Dowd’s comprehensive analysis of new excess deaths and highest-ever disability among Americans, I was struck that he never once asks us to take his word for anything, and always puts the original source material right in front of us. Even so, and even though he’s a brilliant analyst coming to this topic unconflicted, could we really rely upon Ed Dowd’s conclusions over the conclusions of the famous and powerful Doctors Fauci, Califf, Bourla and Walensky?

That was my last rhetorical question.

Gavin de Becker

SEEING IS BELIEVING

by Gavin de Becker

I asked Ed Dowd if I could have space in his book for an article about what we saw around the world as mass vaccination commenced. In light of Ed’s stunning analysis, it is particularly instructive to look at data for those countries that did not have high numbers of COVID deaths prior to mass vaccination, because they afford the simplest comparison:

1. They had very low rates of death attributed to COVID

2. Then they commenced mass vaccination

3. Then they experienced huge increases in deaths attributed to COVID

South Korea gives us a fast example among many: Prior to their wide rollout of mRNA vaccines, they had almost no COVID deaths. You see that nearly all their COVID deaths occurred after mass vaccination.

Due to frequent supply problems, South Korea’s mass vaccination program really took off after the Third Quarter of 2021 when they borrowed hundreds of thousands of Pfizer doses from Israel. Their COVID deaths soon followed. That wasn’t supposed to happen.

In November 2021, President Moon began a massive campaign to push boosters: “The vaccination can be completed only after receiving the third jab.” His citizens complied, reaching more than 90% of adults fully vaccinated – the chart shows the COVID deaths that followed.

The same pattern repeats all over the world, and since seeing is believing, I’ll pause here and resume in more detail after some quick sample charts...

Israel was the world’s poster child for Pfizer’s vaccine product: Like all these countries, Israel had the majority of its COVID deaths after mass vaccination.

And finally, Vietnam: They began mass vaccination in March 2021, purchasing five different vaccine products from around the world – and they saw no jump in COVID deaths. However, in early July 2021, the US Government began donating millions of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines – and that’s exactly when Vietnam experienced the massive spike in COVID deaths you see in the chart.

Any way you think about it, those charts should not look like that if vaccination was effective.

Why would so many countries big and small, rich and poor, in different parts of the world, some with congested cities, some sparsely populated, cold weather or hot weather, tropical or desert, high altitude or low altitude, small islands or landlocked – why would they all see increases in COVID deaths after mass vaccination?

That’s a question one imagines public health officials and media would be motivated to carefully analyze and answer. Instead, they’ve been united in keeping such facts out of public discourse. The reality displayed on the graphs you’ve seen is undeniable, cannot be unseen, and is available to anyone more interested and more industrious than media and government have been.

For curious minds, one explanation to consider is revealed through extensive pre-COVID research establishing that people’s immune systems are weakened by some vaccines. Just a few examples among many:

2011 study: Annual vaccination for influenza “may render young children who have not previously been infected with influenza more susceptible to infection with a pandemic influenza virus of a novel subtype.”

2013 study: Vaccination may make flu worse if exposed to a second strain [as has been the case with COVID for billions of people].

2018 study: Acute respiratory infections increase following vaccination. This study compared vaccinated people to unvaccinated people.

More recently, a Dutch study of healthcare workers showed a massive increase in COVID infection in the two weeks after the first shot.

Aware of this Danish study, the British Medical Journal published a letter calling for an urgent investigation:

“Given the evidence of white cell depletion after COVID vaccination and the evidence of increased COVID infection rates shortly after vaccination, the possibility that the two are causally related needs urgent investigation.”

The Danish study showed “a 40% increase in infections in the first two weeks after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination, despite not vaccinating in homes with recent outbreaks,” meaning they knew it wasn’t because people happened to already be infected at the time they were vaccinated. The 40% number comes up again, in the BMJ letter: “The original Pfizer trial demonstrated a statistically significant 40% increase in suspected COVID.”

Looking for a more comfortable answer to the sad riddle, some people might speculate that the deaths you’ve seen on all those graphs occurred because people became less cautious after vaccination. The British Medical Journal considered and discounted that theory, citing several studies that show increased infections in the weeks after vaccination, and pointing out the example of care home residents, who actually shielded more after vaccination:

“No one is suggesting there was a change of behaviour within care homes. However, care homes in every corner of the country saw outbreaks from December. What changed?”

Excellent question. Obvious answer.

If these new Pharma products had been bound by the same laws as all other Pharma products, their TV commercials would have to end with the familiar announcer hurriedly rushing through side effects:

COVID vaccines will leave some people more vulnerable to infection and sickness. Some people will experience side effects including cardiac arrest, blood clots, stroke, and sudden death.

It wouldn’t make for a very good sales pitch.

Of course, Pfizer and Moderna didn’t need any sales pitch for these vaccines – since the products were developed, ordered, purchased, promoted, defended, indemnified and even mandated by our own government.

THE COMPENDIUM

COMPENDIUM SAMPLING

This Compendium is a collection of reports on sudden unexpected deaths during 2021 and much of 2022, notably situations in which people collapsed or were found dead in non-hospital settings, meaning they were not under a doctor’s care when the medical emergency occurred.

METHODOLOGY

Nearly all incidents in the Compendium were gleaned from news media reports. Though we sometimes encountered conflicting information, the basic issue in these media reports appears accurate: a healthy young person died suddenly and unexpectedly. When possible, we drew upon later reports, since initial or so-called breaking news stories often contain inaccuracy and unreasonable speculation.

When young people collapse and die at sporting events, the collapses are witnessed by spectators and thus more likely to be reported in news stories. Similarly, in small towns, a young athlete might be well known in the community making it more likely that their sudden death will be reported.

In contrast, most children and teenagers dying in their sleep in a big city would not be reported in the news at all. For these and other reasons, the Compendium makes no effort whatsoever to be a comprehensive collection.

In a very few rare instances where age at death was not reported, we estimated based upon appearance in a photo or upon grade level at school.

A SAMPLE, NOT A COMPLETE COLLECTION

While the number of cases described in the Compendium is large, the Compendium is not held out as a complete listing of sudden deaths of healthy young people since 2021 – far from it. Aiming at a comprehensive collection would fail in any event, given that very few of these incidents are reported by national media companies. Rather, the Compendium sought to assemble a sample that is sufficient to offer insight and to support meaningful conclusions.

CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION

There were two fairly obvious criteria to be met before an incident could be considered for inclusion in this Compendium:

1. The incident became known beyond the people and families immediately involved (most often by becoming a news story); or,

2. The incident became known in some other way, such as appearing in the medical or scientific literature.

CRITERIA FOR EXCLUSION

Though there were just two criteria for inclusion of incidents, there were many criteria for exclusion. Rumors, cases merely heard about, and second/third/fourth-hand reports were excluded. Also excluded were deaths about which there was any indication that the person was already severely sick at the time of death (for example, in the care of a doctor or hospital). Also excluded: situations in which there is any indication of suicide, homicide, other foul play, drug overdose, accident, etc.

A SAMPLING THAT COMMUNICATES FREQUENCY, HUMANITY, IMPORTANCE, SETTING AND SITUATION

While the Compendium contains many names, ages, and links to news stories, some examples in the book contain images of newspaper headlines and stories. Our purpose is to show, in the least gratuitous and most efficient way possible, that there have been many sudden deaths of healthy young people in 2021/2022, that this is an issue of high public importance, that many sudden deaths have been reported in the news, and that these stories and incidents are widespread.

The headlines themselves often demonstrate that the deaths were shocking and unexpected. Photos often allow the reader to see that the person is young and fit. Photos sometimes communicate that the death would not be expected. Photos depicting athletes in team uniforms, for example, make clear that the young person was, by all appearances, healthy enough to be included in competitive sports, that team management was likely not aware of any health issues for that player, and that death in that setting and situation is unexpected.

The number of headlines or images included in the sampling is a fraction of the total amount available, even a small fraction of the sampling available in this Compendium. In all cases, the content was selected and highlighted from a larger list of cases in support of a specific purpose; for example, it took a certain number of cases to communicate that many healthy people had died in their sleep.

Other images communicated that many famous young people died suddenly in 2021/2022. Still other images communicated that many young medical professionals died suddenly in 2021/2022.

All news headlines and any images included with stories were already public, and newspapers or news outlets had already clearly accomplished their publication goals well in advance of this book, meaning they were not denied any opportunity to publish first. The Compendium team are not aware of any circumstance in which our use could preclude profitable or beneficial use of the same material by news outlets, copyright holders, or anyone else.

Finally, the team found no instances in which images that had been public in news stories were objected to or retracted.

Everyone involved in this book expresses their sadness and condolences about these tragic early deaths.

APPENDIX ONE

A SAMPLING OF SCHOLARLY AND SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ON SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN ATHLETES

- Sports-related sudden cardiac death in a competitive and a noncompetitive athlete population aged 12 to 49 years: data from a nationwide study in Denmark

- Published May 2014

- Study reviewed all deaths for people 12-49 years old, 2007-2009

- Of the total 881 sudden cardiac deaths, only 44 were attributed to athletes

- Non-athletes had 20 times more sudden cardiac death than athletes

- Comparison of the Frequency of Sudden Cardiovascular Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes Versus Nonathletes?

- Published February 2016

- Sudden cardiac deaths were 8 times more common in nonathletes than athletes

- Incidence of sudden cardiac arrest and death in young competitive athletes: a 4-year prospective study

- Published November 2021

- Study looked at sudden cardiac arrest in US competitive athletes 2014-2018

- The study found 173 fatalities over 4-years (and 158 survivors)

- Incidence and Etiology of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Death in High School Athletes in the United States

- Published November 2016

- Reviewed sudden cardiac arrest and death in high school athletes from seven states 2007-2013

- Included 36% of the total high school athlete population during those 7-years

- Only 69 deaths were identified over 7-years

- Sudden Cardiac Arrest During Competitive Sports

- Published November 2016

- Study designed to review all out-of-hospital cardiac-arrests of athletes between 2009-2014

- 74 sudden cardiac arrests occurred during sports, but only 16 during competitive sports

- “The occurrence of sudden cardiac arrest due to structural heart disease was uncommon during participation in competitive sports”

- Incidence and causes of sudden death in U.S. college athletes

- Published April 2014

- Over the 10-year study period, 182 sudden deaths occurred, 64 likely cardiovascular

- Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 athletes who died (or survived cardiac arrest) in the U.S., 1980-2006

- Published March 2009

- Based upon a large national registry covering 27-year period, the study identified an average of 44 incidents per year 1980–1993, and 66 incidents per year 2000– 2006, an average of about 5 per month

- Sports-related sudden cardiac death in Spain

- Published March 2021

- Reviewed autopsy results for 25 provinces in Spain 2010–2017

- Almost all deaths occurred in non-competitive recreational sports

- Sudden cardiac death in athletes

- Published March 2014

- “The incidence of SCD in young athletes is in fact very low, around 1-3 per 100,000, but attracts much public attention”

- Sports-Related Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Germany

- Published January 2021

- Included competitive and recreational sports activities

- Over a 6-year period, an average of 25 deaths per year, athletes and non-athletes

- Pathogeneses of sudden cardiac death in national collegiate athletic association athletes

- Published April 2014

- 45 cases of sudden cardiac death were identified from 2004 to 2008

- The most common finding was a structurally normal heart or autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death

MORE SCHOLARLY STUDIES & WRITINGS ON SUDDEN DEATHS IN ATHLETES

1. An autopsy study of sudden cardiac death in persons age 1-40

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25575272/

2. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes and nonathletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21716109/

3. Sudden unexpected death of cardiac origin in the 6 to 18 years population. Role of sports?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16051073/

4. Risk of sudden cardiac death in young athletes: which screening strategies are appropriate?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15331292/

5. Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14662259/

6. Survival from sports-related sudden cardiac arrest: In sports facilities versus outside of sports facilities

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26299232/

7. Sudden Cardiac Death: Autopsy Findings in 7200 Cases Between 2001 and 2015

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27973393/

8. Sudden cardiac death: a nationwide cohort study among the young

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27910804/

9. Sudden cardiac death in athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18634917/

10. Cardiac disease at risk in the young athlete

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24856863/

11. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24007846/

12. Incidence, Cause, and Comparative Frequency of Sudden Cardiac Death in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes: A Decade in Review

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25977310/

13. Sports-related sudden cardiac death in Switzerland classified by static and dynamic components of exercise

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26915579/

14. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17322504/

15. Data from a nationwide registry on sports-related sudden cardiac deaths in Germany

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26130495/

16. Sports-related and non-sports-related sudden cardiac death in young adults

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1825009/

17. Sport Related Sudden Death: The Importance of Primary and Secondary Prevention

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36012921/

18. Sudden cardiac death in athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1450882/

19. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes: trying to find the needle in the haystack

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17970016/

20. Sudden Unexpected Death Due to Myocarditis in Young People, Including Athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33347841/

21. Cardiac arrest and sudden death in competitive athletes with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9474700/

22. Sudden Cardiac Death in the Adolescent Athlete: History, Diagnosis, and Prevention

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31199891/

23. Pathoanatomic Findings Associated With Duty-Related Cardiac Death in US Firefighters: A Case-Control Study

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30371185/

24. Causes of sudden death in young and middle-aged competitive athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9276168/

25. Risk of sports-related sudden cardiac death in women

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34894223/

26. Incidence of sudden cardiac death in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21464047/

27. Causes of sudden cardiac death in young athletes and non-athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis: Sudden cardiac death in the young

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34166791/

28. Nationwide burden of sudden cardiac death: A study of 54,028 deaths in Denmark

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33965606/

29. Sudden Cardiac Death in Athletes in Italy during 2019: Internet-Based Epidemiological Research

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33445447/

30. Sudden cardiac death in the young: a 1-year post-mortem analysis in the Republic of Ireland

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19221830/

31. Sudden Cardiac Death in Athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34669953/

32. Assessment of premature ventricular beats in athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30430516/

33. Epidemiology of Football-Related Sudden Cardiac Death in Turkey

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34684142/

34. Cardiac Screening of Young Athletes: a Practical Approach to Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30155696/

35. Sudden death from cardiovascular disease in young athletes: fact or fiction?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9429003/

36. Incidence and Causes of Sudden Cardiac Death in Athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35710267/

37. Sudden unexpected nontraumatic death in 54 young adults: a 30-year population-based study

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7611149/

38. Cardiac arrest at rest and during sport activity: causes and prevention

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32523432/

39. Sudden death and physical activity in athletes and nonathletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8581570/

40. Demographics and Epidemiology of Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes: From the United States National Registry

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27039955/

41. Sudden cardiac death among general population and sport related population in forensic experience

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26344462/

42. Sudden death during sport activity in Tunisia: autopsy study in 32 cases

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22959438/

43. Causes of sudden cardiac death in young Australians

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14748671/

44. Incidence of cardiovascular sudden deaths in Minnesota high school athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23207138/

45. Epidemiology of Sudden Death in Organized Youth Sports in the United States, 2007-2015

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31013114/

46. Study of sudden cardiac deaths in young athletes

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12793636/

47. Incidence and etiology of sports-related sudden cardiac death in Denmark--implications for preparticipation screening

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20580680/

48. Sudden cardiac death in children and adolescents between 1 and 19 years of age

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24239636/

49. Pathology of sudden death during recreational sports in Spain

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23398926/

50. Sudden death in sports among young adults in Norway

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20038839/

51. Sudden death in young competitive athletes: clinicopathologic correlations in 22 cases

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2239978/

APPENDIX TWO

WHY DEATHS MOVED FROM THE ELDERLY TO YOUNGER HEALTHIER AMERICANS

The Group Life business is comprised of policies sold to mid-sized companies and large corporations for employers to give as a benefit to their employees. This is different form individual life policies and are accounted for under a different method. Group Life polices are repriced every 1-2 years typically and as result losses or profits show up much more quickly in the Profit & Loss statement of the insurance companies. Therefore, Josh Stirling and I focused on these divisions as excess deaths would likely show up in the results very quickly if our thesis was correct. If anyone reading this book have ever worked for a large company, you might have signed a death benefit form when you onboarded with Human Resources at your firm. Typically upon starting you fill out various form’s…healthcare, security cards etc. If you were offered a death benefit in this process, it would typically be 1-2 times your base salary and you’d be asked to name the beneficiary on the form; if married you would name your spouse, or if single maybe your parents. The age that experienced the most dramatic increase in the SOA excess death were the millennials (ages 25-44) in the third quarter of 2021 which represents the months of July, August, and September.

When we first revealed the CDC data in March, I mentioned in interviews that the pushback explanation for this age group was that it was due to suicides (deaths of despair), drug overdoses and missed medical treatments-cancer screenings from lockdowns. I have already argued that the obvious three-month temporal rate of change increase in August, September and October can’t be explained by the three above mentioned potential causes. It’s statistically impossible that in a three-month period, all those events up-ticked simultaneously across the country. The Group Life survey being a subset of the CDC data with almost the same excess mortality rate that we found in March in the CDC data for millennials makes the naysayers excuses even more absurd at the time I broke this new SOA data to the independent news media. I argued in August and early September of 2022 that this is a population that is employed with a good enough high value job to receive a death benefit. The drug overdose argument slips away because employed people with insurance tend not to have Heroin-fentanyl habits, and tend to keep their jobs.

Secondly while suicides do happen, the deaths-of-despair argument would apply mostly to unemployed folks who were displaced from COVID, but not to this population as they are employed and certainly didn’t all commit suicide together in a three-month time frame. Bottomline: This subset of the population tends to be healthier and happier in general, yet experienced the same adverse event into the fall of 2021. The mainstream media offers up ridiculous excuses, but don’t even ask the question if it could possibly be the “vaccine.”

SOA ON SEPTEMBER 12 REVEALS US GROUP LIFE POPULATION DIED MORE THAN GENERAL US POPULATION WHICH HISTORICALLY IS NOT THE CASE

The deductive reasoning I used in the preceding section that in general the group life population is healthier than the total US population was confirmed later when I found a SOA report from October 2016 and one published recently on September 12, 2022. Both reports when examined can lead to no other conclusion than that pre-COVID this population was healthier by a wide margin than the general population. The September 2022 report is simply stunning, and basically reports that this historical relationship flipped on its head starting in 2021 and substantially adds to the thesis that the vaccines were responsible for this increase in All-Cause Mortality.

The group life insured population typically has substantially lower mortality rates than the comparable working age group of the broader US population. There are a variety of factors that contribute to this phenomenon which include the requirement to be actively at work (therefore healthy enough to work) and insured groups tend to have more education and higher earnings than that of the uninsured working age general population.

The Society of Actuaries (SOA) published a study in 2016 that covered a 4-year period from 2010 – 2013 on group life insurance mortality. The study was expansive across the group life industry and included almost 97 thousand death claims.

Exhibits 1.11 and 1.12 of the SOA study show that the group life insured mortality rates for the working ages were generally 30 – 40% of the overall US population mortality rates for the 4-year study period. In other words, the group life insured typically experience one-third to two-fifths the rate of mortality of the general US population in any given year.

Exhibits 1.11 and 1.12 of the SOA study show that the group life insured mortality rates for the working ages were generally 30 – 40% of the overall US population mortality rates for the 4-year study period. In other words, the group life insured typically experience one-third to two-fifths the rate of mortality of the general US population in any given year.

To reiterate what has already been discussed and shown (Table 5.7), the SOA published a Group Life mortality study in August 2022 which covers the period from second quarter (April-June) 2020 through first quarter (January-March) 2022. This newer study is specifically focused on the mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic period for people insured by a group life insurance policy.

Again Table 5.7 of the August study shows that the 25 – 64 year age groups experienced elevated mortality for the first 5 quarters of the pandemic, but then something catastrophic hit that age group starting in Q3 2021.

Using the table above, we can determine that the 25 – 64 age group of the group life population experienced 125% and 140% excess mortality in the last 9 months of 2020 and the full year 2021, respectively. As we know, COVID was not a respecter of persons, and it spread across the population regardless of employment, wealth, or vaccine status. We should expect, then, that the excess mortality rates by age group should be comparable across the group life population versus the general population. Remember in March Josh and I focused on general US population All-Cause Mortality CDC data for the millennial cohort ages 25-44. Specifically we focused on the trend to a new high of 84% excess mortality into the third quarter of 2021 (July-September), the massive rate of change and how impossible it would be to explain it away by a temporal and statistically impossible simultaneous increase in suicides, drug overdoses and misses medical treatments. The August SOA study which is a separate data base than the CDC essentially confirmed our analysis of the third quarter of 2021 and real-life claims were paid out. As you already know we argued the only possible explanation was the timing of the mandates and the “vaccines.”

Then the SOA published a report in September 2022 which speaks to the group life mortality experience relative to the general US population mortality experience since the start of the pandemic.

The punchline is essentially that the group life population (which is much healthier than the general US population) in 2021 experienced a massive 8% higher mortality rate than the overall US population. What changed in 2021 to cause this normal relationship to flip suddenly?

The only thing that changed was a mandated vaccination campaign where continued employment was contingent upon compliance with no exceptions.

Analysis Below:

The study shows that, indeed, the excess mortality in 2020 for the working ages were similar for the group life population versus the general population. Table 10 of that study indicates that the 15-64 age band across the general US population experienced a 123.6% excess mortality rate in the last 9 months of 2020. Given that the 15-24 age band represents a negligible % of the overall death claims, we can compare the 123.6% to the 125% in the 25-64 age band from the group life study. Close enough to call it a draw.

Now let’s see what happened in 2021. Table 11 of the September 2022 SOA study indicates that the working age group of the general US population experienced an excess mortality rate of 131.7% in 2021. The 25 – 64 old ages in the group life population experienced a 140% excess mortality rate in 2021. What happened in the insured, employed population in 2021 to cause an outsized 8% higher mortality impact relative to the same ages across the general population??

In Table 12 of that same study, the author concludes something similar by adjusting the US population mortality to exclude a portion of the population over age 55 (in order to compare to the overall group life results). The conclusion was the same: the working age group had higher excess mortality in the group life space than the general US population in 2021 but not in 2020. Why??

Remember a thesis in stock picking is formulated in a moment of time…then as time marches on the thesis is either strengthened or weakened by subsequent data when it emerges. The proof is in the pudding so to speak mostly appearing in the quarterly results reported by the company. The same thing holds true for my vaccine as the culprit for the increase in Sudden deaths and All-Cause Mortality in 2021 and 2022. First our CDC data that we sourced showing a spike in millennial excess deaths into the third quarter, then a SOA report that came out in August with table 5.7 confirming our CDC data, and now this SOA September 12 report comes out as I was writing this section of the book and had to add the analysis immediately. Since the CDC data presented by me on independent media in March it has been my contention that the vaccine mandates announced in late summer and the anticipation of the executive order in September of 2021 caused a massive uptake of the vaccine hesitant resulting in excess mortality among young healthy millennials ages 25-44. The vaccine to me was the only plausible explanation which we unfortunately are not allowed to address on the mainstream media. Now having set the frame that a 2016 industry study indicates that the group life insured population historically has a much lower mortality rate than the US population pre COVID (30-40%) we now are presented with the September 2022 SOA report which indicates that this same employed population flipped to an 8% higher rate of excess mortality versus its baseline in 2021 than the general US population excess mortality versus its baseline in 2021. Did the virus mutate and decide to kill much healthier people in 2021? Did the virus decide to disproportionally target the employed rather than the unemployed? Did the virus decide to disproportionally target insured employees versus uninsured employees? Obviously this evidence is very compelling that something new and novel was happening to insured, working employees in 2021 that did not happen in the years prior to 2020 when COVID was raging. Using rudimentary deductive reasoning there is only one thing changed in 2021 and it wasn’t the virus which was becoming less virulent. The employed insured population was forced to take an experimental vaccine product to maintain their employment—even if they were hesitant, or had a medical or religious objection—while those who were unemployed or retired had a choice.

If my thesis were a stock it would be up 15%-20% on this news as September 14th, 2022, and trending higher because an increased number of people are becoming aware of this trend. They might not know the reason, but the trend is becoming undeniable at this point.

The damning part of the report (page 21) is here for your reference:

“Comparing these numbers to the Group Life numbers, we see that, in the last nine months of 2020, the proportional impact for the Group Life market was somewhat below the impact for the U.S. population (19.8% versus 22.6%), whereas the Group Life market had a similar impact for non-COVID deaths. (5.1% versus 5.0%). For 2021, the Group Life experience was proportionally worse (22.0% versus 17.9% and 3.6% versus 2.3%). One of the features of 2021 was that excess mortality was worse for the working ages. We see that the impact on the U.S. population between 15 and 64 was 31.7% worse, much higher than for the Group Life market. The two populations are different, with Group Life having fewer, but not zero, older people exposed to coverage. In the last version of this report, we considered age-adjusted results by using only 55% of the lives exposed above age 64. Continuing to use this adjustment, we see the following results: With this adjustment, the Group Life market was still proportionally worse in 2021 (22.0% versus 20.0%).”

APPENDIX THREE

PHINANCE TECHNOLOGIES

Phinance Technologies is a global macro alternative investment firm. The flagship product is a Futures fund using proprietary fundamental economic algorithms to generate investment ideas with rigorous risk overlays. The fund is a conservatively leveraged fund that provides a highly liquid alternative to traditional asset classes. It has a low correlation with the equity markets and is designed to be suitable as an alternative investment, particularly in a period of global uncertainty and volatility.

Carlos Alegria is the principal responsible for strategy development. He holds an MSc and PhD in Finance from the University of Southampton, UK. While pursuing his PhD on stock market anomalies, he consulted with a global macro hedge fund on quantitative strategies. After his PhD he joined Winton Capital, a leading $15bn CTA, where he was responsible for developing event-driven strategies in both stock and futures markets. He lectured Financial Risk Management at the University of Southampton, and published in international finance journals. Prior to his career in finance, he was a PhD Physicist by training.

Edward Dowd is responsible for marketing and client relations. He has worked on Wall Street most of his career spanning both credit markets and equity markets. Some of the firms he worked for include HSBC, Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, Independence Investments and most notably at Blackrock as a portfolio manager, where he managed a $14 billion Growth Equity Portfolio for 10 years. While at BlackRock, he consistently generated top quartile returns on the Lipper large cap growth category, and led/participated in marketing meetings that contributed to $12 billion in asset growth.

Yuri Nunes is a researcher in quantitative investment strategies and developing of systematic trading systems. He holds a PhD in Applied Physics, MSc in Financial Mathematics, PAPCC (MSc equivalent) in Physics Engineering, and a Graduate Degree in Physics Engineering from Nova University, Lisbon. Working in both academia and industry, he is Professor with tenure at the Nova Science and Technology School.

In addition to its other pro bono work, Phinance funds The Humanity Project.

THE HUMANITY PROJECT

Recognizing as we all do that financial and political capture has derailed the original intent of our public health institutions, The Humanity Project uses independent research and rigorous data analysis to examine decision-making by regulatory institutions.

APPENDIX FOUR

SAMPLING OF 100 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON COVID VACCINE-INDUCED CARDIAC INJURIES TO YOUNG PEOPLE

1. “The alarming onset of some cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following the administration of Pfizer–BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines in adolescent males has recently been highlighted.” https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7503/13/3/61

2. Be alert to the risk of adverse cardiovascular events after COVID-19 vaccination https://www.xiahepublishing.com/m/2472-0712/ERHM-2021-00033

3. Myocarditis after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in members of the US military. “23 male patients, including 22 previously healthy military members, myocarditis was identified within 4 days after receipt of the vaccine” https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601

4. Patel, Y. R. (2021). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: a case series. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496880

5. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34496880/

6. Myocarditis after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in members of the US military. “23 male patients, including 22 previously healthy military members, myocarditis was identified within 4 days after receipt of the vaccine”: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601

7. “The vaccine was associated with an excess risk of myocarditis” https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110475

8. Myo/pericarditis in a previously healthy adolescent male after COVID-19 vaccination: Case report: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34133825/

9. McLean, K., & Johnson, T. J. (2021). Myopericarditis in a previously healthy adolescent male following COVID-19 vaccination: A case report. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34133825

10. Peri/myocarditis after the first dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Modern) mRNA-1273 vaccine in a young healthy male: case report: https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-021-02183

11. Hasnie, A. (2021). Perimyocarditis following first dose of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Moderna) vaccine in a healthy young male. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348657

12. Young male with myocarditis after mRNA-1273 coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34744118/

13. Facetti, S., Giraldi, (2021). Acute myocarditis in a young adult two days after Pfizer vaccination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34709227

14. Truong, D. T. (2021). Clinically Suspected Myocarditis Temporally Related to COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents and Young Adults. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865500

15. Acute myocarditis in a young adult two days after vaccination with Pfizer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34709227/

16. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series: https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-021-00795-4

17. Multimodality imaging and histopathology in a young man presenting with fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis and cardiogenic shock after vaccination with mRNA-1273: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34848416/

18. Myocarditis after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in members of the U.S. military: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601%5C

19. Acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after COVID-19 vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34364657/

20. Severe and refractory immune thrombocytopenia occurring after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33854395/

21. Report of a case of myopericarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA in a young Korean male: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34636504/

22. Clinical Guidance for Young People with Myocarditis and Pericarditis after Vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA: “There is a temporal association between receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis among youth.” https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/clinical-guidance-for-youth-with-myocarditis-and-pericarditis

23. In-depth evaluation of a case of presumed myocarditis after the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056038

24. Acute peri/myocarditis after the first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34515024/

25. Snapiri, O (2021). Cardiac Injury in Adolescents Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077949

26. Schauer, J. (2021). Myopericarditis After the Pfizer Messenger Vaccine in Adolescents https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228985

27. Myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination: “The incidence rate was higher in adolescents and after the administration of the second dose of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Overall, mRNA vaccines were significantly associated with increased risks for myocarditis/pericarditis” https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/11/1106

28. Clinical suspicion of myocarditis temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056583?ub%20%200pubmed

29. Peri/Myocarditis after the first dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Modern) mRNA-1273 vaccine in a young healthy male: case report: https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-021-02183

30. Hasnie, A. (2021). Peri/myocarditis following first dose of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 (Moderna) vaccine in a healthy young male. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348657

31. Young male with myocarditis after mRNA-1273 coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34744118/

32. Acute myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a 24-year-old male: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34334935/

33. Young Male with Myocarditis Following mRNA-1273 Vaccination Against Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744118

34. Facetti, S., Giraldi, (2021). [Acute myocarditis in a young adult two days after Pfizer vaccination]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34709227

35. Patel, Y. R. (2021). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: a case series. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34496880

36. Truong, D. T. (2021). Clinically Suspected Myocarditis Temporally Related to COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents and Young Adults. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865500

37. Acute myocarditis in a young adult two days after vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34709227/

38. Acute myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a 24-year-old man: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255121003243

39. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series: https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-021-00795-4

40. Multimodality imaging and histopathology in a young man presenting with fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis and cardiogenic shock after vaccination with mRNA-1273: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34848416/

41. Myocarditis after immunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in members of the U.S. military: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601%5C

42. In-depth evaluation of a case of presumed myocarditis after the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056038

43. Acute peri/myocarditis after the first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34515024/

44. Acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after COVID-19 vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34364657/

45. Report of a case of myopericarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA in a young Korean male: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34636504/

46. Clinical Guidance for Young People with Myocarditis and Pericarditis after Vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA: “There is a temporal association between receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis among youth.” https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/clinical-guidance-for-youth-with-myocarditis-and-pericarditis

47. Petra Zimmerman, Andrew J Pollard (2021) “The relatively low risk posed by acute COVID-19 in children, and uncertainty about the relative harms from vaccination and disease mean that the balance of risk and benefit of vaccination in this age group is more complex.” (Andrew Pollard is chair of UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunization https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34732388/

48. Das, B. (2021). Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Children. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356586

49. Association of myocarditis with COVID-19 messenger RNA BNT162b2 vaccine COVID-19 in a case series of children: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34374740/

50. Epidemiology and clinical features of myocarditis/pericarditis before the introduction of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in Korean children: a multicenter study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34402230/

51. Epidemiology and clinical features of myocarditis/pericarditis before the introduction of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in Korean children: a multicenter study https://search.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/covidwho-1360706

52. Association of myocarditis with COVID-19 messenger RNA BNT162b2 vaccine in a case series of children: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2783052

53. Association of myocarditis with the BNT162b2 messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine in a case series of children: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34374740/

54. Myocarditis associated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in children aged 12 to 17 years: stratified analysis of a national database: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1

55. Association of myocarditis with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children: https://media.jamanetwork.com/news-item/association-of-myocarditis-with-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-in-children/

56. Epidemiology and clinical features of myocarditis/pericarditis before the introduction of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in Korean children: a multicenter study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34402230/

57. Park, J. (2021). Self-limited myocarditis presenting with chest pain and ST segment elevation in adolescents after vaccination with mRNA vaccine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180390

58. Minocha, P. (2021). Recurrence of Acute Myocarditis Temporally Associated with Receipt of the mRNA Vaccine in a Male Adolescent. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166671

59. Long, S. S. (2021). Important Insights into Myopericarditis after the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34332972

60. Kwan, M. (2021). mRNA COVID vaccine and myocarditis in adolescents https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393110

61. Jain, S. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Adolescents. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389692

62. Recurrence of acute myocarditis temporally associated with receipt of coronavirus mRNA vaccine in a male adolescent: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002234762100617X

63. Umei, T. (2021). Recurrence of myopericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in a male adolescent. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904134

64. Foltran, D. (2021). Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Adolescents after First and Second doses of mRNA Vaccines. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849667

65. Chua, G. (2021). Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849657

66. Chelala, L. (2021). Myocarditis After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Adolescents. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704459

67. Azir, M. (2021). Focal Myocarditis in an Adolescent Patient After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34756746

68. Guillain-Barre syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination in an adolescent: https://www.pedneur.com/article/S0887-8994(21)00221-6/fulltext

69. Myocarditis and pericarditis in adolescents after the first and second doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34849667/

70. Peri/myocarditis in adolescents after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34319393/

71. Acute myopericarditis after COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34589238/

72. Calcaterra, G. (2021). COVID 19 Vaccine for Adolescents. Concern about Myocarditis and Pericarditis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564344

73. Chai, Q. (2022). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in a male adolescent after his second Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617315

74. Myopericarditis after Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002234762100665X

75. Myo/pericarditis after vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA in adolescents 12 to 18 years of age: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347621007368

76. Association of myocarditis with COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a case series of children: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2783052

77. Important information on myopericarditis after vaccination with Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA in adolescents: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347621007496

78. Self-limited myocarditis presenting with chest pain and ST-segment elevation in adolescents after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34180390/

79. Symptomatic Acute Myocarditis in 7 Adolescents after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccination: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/148/3/e2021052478

80. Cardiac injury in adolescents receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Abstract/9000/Transient_Cardiac_Injury_in_Adolescents_Receiving.95800.aspx

81. Peri/Myocarditis in adolescents after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine: https://academic.oup.com/jpids/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jpids/piab060/6329543

82. Acute myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a 24-year-old male: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34334935/

83. Acute symptomatic myocarditis in seven adolescents after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/06/04/peds.2021-052478

84. Nygaard, U. (2022). Population-based Incidence of Myopericarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination in Danish Adolescents. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34889875

85. COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis: a case report with review of the literature: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402121002253

86. STEMI mimicry: focal myocarditis in an adolescent patient after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34756746/

87. Kohli, U. (2021). mRNA Coronavirus-19 Vaccine-Associated Myopericarditis in Adolescents: A Survey Study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952008

88. Epidemiology of acute myocarditis/pericarditis in Hong Kong adolescents after co-vaccination: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab989/644 5179.

89. Epidemiology of acute myocarditis/pericarditis in Hong Kong adolescents after co-vaccination: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab989/6445179

90. Clinical suspicion of myocarditis temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults: “Abnormal findings on cMRI were frequent. Future studies should evaluate risk factors, mechanisms, and long-term outcomes.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34865500/

91. Myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents: https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/148/5/e2021053427/181357

92. Myocarditis findings on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA in adolescents:. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34704459/

93. Acute myopericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents:. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34589238/.

94. “7 cases of acute myocarditis or myopericarditis in healthy male adolescents who presented with chest pain within 4 days after the second dose.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34088762/.

95. Myocarditis and pericarditis in adolescents after first and second doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines:. https://academic.oup.com/ehjqcco/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab090/64 42104

96. COVID-19 Vaccination Associated with Myocarditis in Adolescents: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2021/08/12/peds.2021-053427.full.pdf

97. Kostoff, R. N. (2021a). “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642628

98. Acute myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a 24-year-old man: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255121003243

99. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in young adult patients with acute myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34496880/

100. Myopericarditis in a previously healthy adolescent male after COVID-19 vaccination: Case report: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34133825/

For links to 1000 (one thousand) scientific papers on COVID vaccine injury...

APPENDIX FIVE

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

All books are a team effort to some degree, this one more than most.

My thanks first to Gavin de Becker, for suggesting this project to me and for his contributions to the book.

Thanks to Geoff Towle for designing and creating the visual and graphical elements of this book, and to Dylan Harnett for his key role in assembling and confirming hundreds of sample cases for the Compendium.

A special thanks to Tony Lyons of Skyhorse Publishing for his encouragement and support throughout this project. With each new book, Tony Lyons again proves his belief in freedom of speech and resistance to censorship.

Data is the key to this book’s conclusions, and my team of Josh Stirling, Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes did superb work in helping me collect and analyze the public (and non-public) information.

Speaking of non-public, my gratitude to the anonymous individuals in the insurance industry that have pointed me in the right direction and shared their inside view of what’s going on. My thanks to Drs. Robert Malone and Jill Malone for their important encouragement during my early public revelations, and for showing the public what it looks like when scientists plainly speak the facts.

Tom Lewis, Barry O’Keefe and Andrew Aker contributed their insights to The Malone Doctrine, a writing that has the power to restore integrity in medical science. Dr. Naomi Wolf and the Daily Clout Team acted as true journalists exposing and analyzing the clinical trial data that Pfizer tried hard to keep secret. Brook Jackson showed bravery as a whistleblower, publicly revealing hidden machinations in the Pfizer clinical trials. Mike Moore of the Thomas Paine podcast gave my information some of its earliest public attention.

To former BlackRock colleagues, and current BlackRock experts for their kind support in my efforts. A very big thanks to the doctors who risked their incomes and good names to speak the truth about early treatment protocols, vaccine injuries and deaths that didn’t have to happen.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has my gratitude for the Foreword he wrote, and my enduring respect for his many tireless efforts to expose the ways Big Pharma has corrupted too many of our government institutions.

And finally, a special thanks to my loving and supportive children, Pierce, Grace and Kate, who have been even more patient than usual while my mind was a million miles away, and to their mother, Eriko, who is a kind and capable steward of their growth.

As for my own growth, I thank and honor my father, Ed, for his many hours of loving advice, and the encouragement that kept me on the journey of discovery.

TO AN ATHLETE DYING YOUNG

By A.E. Housman

The time you won your town the race

We chaired you through the market-place;

Man and boy stood cheering by,

And home we brought you shoulder-high.

Today, the road all runners come,

Shoulder-high we bring you home,

And set you at your threshold down,

Townsman of a stiller town.

Smart lad, to slip betimes away

From fields where glory does not stay,

And early though the laurel grows

It withers quicker than the rose.

Eyes the shady night has shut

Cannot see the record cut,

And silence sounds no worse than cheers

After earth has stopped the ears.

Now you will not swell the rout

Of lads that wore their honours out,

Runners whom renown outran

And the name died before the man.

So set, before its echoes fade,

The fleet foot on the sill of shade,

And hold to the low lintel up

The still-defended challenge-cup.

And round that early-laurelled head

Will flock to gaze the strengthless dead,

And find unwithered on its curls

The garland briefer than a girl’s.

Table of Contents

Dedication

Copyright Page

Title Page

Table of Contents

Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Introduction by the Author

Healthy Young Athletes

First, Is It True?

Died Unexpectedly in Their Sleep

The Sad New Normal

VAERS

Young Medical Practitioners

Famous Young People

For Children – A Smoking Gun

News You Likely Missed

Europe

Disability

Survived Adverse Events

Afterword by Gavin de Becker

Seeing Is Believing

The Compendium

APPENDICES

One – Studies on Sudden Athlete Death

Two – Deaths Shift from Old to Young

Three – Phinance Technologies

Four – Cardiac Injuries to Young People

Five – The Malone Doctrine

Acknowledgments