JEWISH INROADS
into British
Royalty
Remarks
by
The Hon. J. Thorkelson of Montana in the British House of Commons
(Wednesday, August 21, 1940)
JEWISH
INROADS INTO BRITISH ROYALTY UP TO THE YEAR 1937
It has long been one of the
Jewish methods in the attainment of world domination to penetrate
into privileged circles where political power is greatest: Edward
the First, by expelling the Jews in 1290, saved us from too early
an application of this process in Britain, but the other
countries were less fortunate and suffered the extinction of
their nobility by Jewish women marrying into the Gentile
aristocratic families.
In Britain a few
"damped" (baptized Christian) Jews remained in the
country when their synagogue-going brothers had been expelled.
Some of these attained
knighthood, for instance, Sir Edward Brampton, who became
Governor of Guernsey. The first serious attempt, however, to
penetrate the ranks of the hereditary Titleholders of England
seems to have been an attack upon royalty itself by that
notorious character, Perkin Warbeck, who was a servant of the
knight mentioned above.
With characteristic Jewish
effrontery, this man claimed the English throne.
Francis Bacon wrote in his Life
of King Henry the VII: "There was a townsman of
Tourney that had born office in that town, whose name was John
Osbeck, a convert Jew, married to Catherine de Faro; whose
business drew him to live for a time with his wife at London, in
King Edward IV's days.
During which time he had a son
by her; and being known in court, the King either out of
religious nobleness, because he was a convert, or upon some
private acquaintance, did him the honor as to be godfather to his
child. and named him Peter.
But afterwards proving a dainty
and effeminate youth, he was commonly called by the diminutive of
his name. Peterkin or Perkin. For, as for the name of Warbeck, it
was given him when they did but guess at it, before examinations
had been taken.
For how many of us at school
realized that Perkin Warbeck was a figure in the Jewish world
plot against us, Sovereignty?
As everyone knows, Cromwell
allowed the Jews to return and they flocked over here toward the
latter part of the seventeenth century, the largest wave of rich
Jews coming over with William III from Holland.
In 1718 the Attorney General,
Sir R. Raymond, hammered another nail into his country's coffin.
By deciding that Jews could hold land in England. Walpole had
previously allowed the Jew Gideon to hold estates by a special
act in his favor: this Jew had lent his "credit" to the
government (!) which seems not to have realized that it had a lot
of its own.
And falsely posing as a
Christian, for he never ceased his payments to the synagogue and
died a Jew, he married a Gentile, his son being created a baronet
and later Baron, Eardley, a title now fortunately extinct. The
first synagogue Jew baronets were Sir I. L. Goldsmid (1841), Sir
Moses Montefiore, and Sir Anthony de Rothschild; these seem to
have qualified for British aristocracy by using their ill-gotten
wealth in buying privileges for the Jews in this and other
countries.
It was Sir Issac . Goldsmid who
led the movement for the admission of the Jews to our
legislature. Once the barrier was down the rest was easy.
In 1858 legislation enabled the
foreign "baron" Lionel de Rothschild to take his oath
in the house of Commons as a Jew. His son was raised to the
peerage in 1885, the "damped" Jew Disraeli had of
course obtained earlier honors, dying as the Earl of
Beaconsfield. Among the earlier Synagogue baronet creations were
those of Sir George Jessel, Sir David Salomans, and Sir John
Simon (no relation to the living Sir John Simon, who claims not
to be Jewish).
British peers sometimes made
matters worse by marrying Jewesses, one of the most disastrous
cases being that of the second Viscount Galway, who married as
early as 1747 a Jewess called Villa Real, as a result of which
countless fine old British families have had this Asiatic strain
instilled into them.
It was a Rothschild plan to
marry superfluous daughters into the families of influential
Gentiles; in this case of the Rothschild unions with Baron
Battersea and the son of the fourth Earl of Hardwicke, the
marriages were sterile, but a daughter of Mayer Amschel
Rothschild married the fifth Earl of Rosebery, so that there is
Rothschild blood in the present earl, one of whose sisters
married the present Marquis of Crewe, himself with Villa Real
blood: thus after many days, the blood of the Villa real Jewess
mingles with that of the Rothschild in the issue of this marriage
of "British Aristocrats".
This custom of mating with
Jewesses now become a common one; the instinct of the Aryan has
been broken down by continued propaganda, and H. Belloc in his
book on The Jews writes of the Jewish
penetration of our great aristocratic families: "With the
opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial
English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the
exception.
In nearly all of them the
strain was more or less marked, in some of them so strong that
though the name was still English and the tradition that of a
purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and
character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family
were taken for Jews whenever they traveled in countries where the
gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this mixture."
A study of the
"society" photographers in any copy of The
Bystander will convince anyone that Mr. Belloc does
not exaggerate.
To those of us who believe that
Bretisation is civilization, it is incomprehensible that our
aristocrats could succumb to the cunning Masonic and educational
Jewish propaganda designed to cause them to forget their nation.
Nevertheless the opposition, to
Jewish penetration into the great families has not been expressed
in any decided way: Masonry is no doubt responsible for this -
Queen Victoria herself had qualms about granting titles to Jews,
because we know that when it was recommend to her that Sir Lionel
Rothschild should be promoted the peerage, she
wrote as follows in a letter dated November 1 1869 to Mr.
Gladstone: "It is not only the feeling of which
she cannot divest herself, against making a person of Jewish
religion a peer, but she can not think that one who owes his
great wealth to contracts with foreign governments for loans or
to successful
speculation
the stock exchange can fairly claim a British peerage."
"However high Sir L.
Rothschild may stand personally in public estimation, this seems
to be not the less a species of gambling because it is on a
gigantic scale and far removed from that legitimate trading which
she delights to honor, in which men have raised themselves by
patient industry and unswerving probity to positions of wealth
and influence."
Her sound instincts, or
"prejudices" as they would be called nowadays in our
Judaized press, were however broken down by Disraeli and we have
now reached such a pitch that in 1932 the Jews were seriously
planning to get the chief rabbi into the House of Lords,
ex-officio.
In 1915 a daughter of the
fourth Baron Sheffield married the Jew Edwin Montague, the
disturber of Indian "pathetic contentment,' and actually
"embraced Judaism" also in the religious sense. There
was more excuse for Lord George Gordon of the 1780 anti-Popery
campaign, who adopted the Jewish religion but died insane.
In the following review of our
titled aristocracy, there are many errors of omission; working
chiefly with Burke's Peerage, we find a
reticence on the subject of Jewish "relativity" in our
nobility; in other words, the volume seems designed to baffle the
investigator as much as possible.
For that reason and also
because the time at our disposal for this research is strictly
limited, the review is far from complete, but it is sufficiently
terrible to a racist as it is.
Every effort has been made to
avoid errors of commission; we do not desire to hurt the feelings
of anyone, but the British people have a right to know the truth;
where ever we have insufficient evidence in suspicious cases, the
benefit of the doubt has been given, we hope, in many future
editions, to be able to make our lists more complete.
The excellent library of he
Society of Genealogists could not produce a single volume which
was of direct help in collecting this material for this pamphlet,
which we hope, therefore, will find a place on its shelves; but
we think something will prevent it getting there.
It may be of interest to
mention that Debrett's Peerage is
published by the same Jew firm Odhams Press, Ltd, which runs the Daily
Herald.
Sir Sidney Lee (Jew) edited the
Dictionary of National Biography, so we
get little help from those. And the Jew, M. Epstein, edits the Annual
Register.
We have omitted from our list
certain cases where Jewesses have married into noble families in
which there the titles are now extinct or from which marriages
there was no issue.
In our investigations we fund
that the statement made by J. M. Macdiarmid in The
Deer Forests that the Leveson-Gower family was
descended from "a London Jew money lender" is false;
the name "Levenson" in this case has no Jewish
application.
Also the statement made in the Jewish
Daily Post June 17, 1935, that the present Duchess of
Norfold has Jewish blood is untrue. she is the second wife of the
last duke and mother of the present duke; and it was the first
wife of the last duke, who left no heir, who had Jewish blood.
The Universe is in error in stating (Feb. 4, 1937) that the
Marquis of Bute is descended from the Jew Treves.
Many Jewish titles, sometimes
camouflaged like those of Barons Wandsworth (real name, Stern)
and Pirbright (real name, De Worms), are fortunately extinct.
Extinct, also is the baronetcy of Sir Edward Speyer, which was
revoked by a notice in The Times of
December 14, 1921 on account of his unlawful communicating and
trading with the enemy during the war.
The effect even a slight
mixture of Jewish blood in an English family is often very great.
It alters the political outlook of the individual because it
alters the instincts themselves.
"One Jew ancestor a long
way back will undo your Anglo-Saxon composition, or which you may
claim an unbroken line of purely Essex stock, more thoroughly
than if all your ancestors, from your parents back had been
Dutch, German, Swede, Dane, French, Russian, Portuguese, Italian
or any other easily assimilated race." W. Gerbardt in Memories
of a Polyglot, 1931.
When a large number of
individuals in commanding social or political positions are
rendered partly Asiatic in instinct, the nation itself becomes
the victim of these destructive instincts.
Referring to Colonel Lane's
book The Alien Menace, the nation itself
becomes the victim of those destructive instincts.
"English men and women are
constantly asking how it comes about that a twist is so
frequently given to British policy that is clearly not in
accordance with British interests.
There is usually someone in a
position, at the psychological moment, to deflect our government,
whatever party be in power, into some line of action that is
unintelligible at the time and is fraught with disastrous
consequences. * * * It is as though some hostile influence were
steadily throwing grit into the machine.
In every international
financial arrangement we fare badly, and the whole story of
reparations and war debts is humiliating in the extreme and
calculated to make us the world's laughing stock, as well as the
world's milk cow.
It is in this connection that
such a book as Colonel Lane has written **** throws a timely
searchlight. It is in the higher ranks of society that the alien
menace is formidable through the influence exercised in
government departments in Downing Street and high finance by
gentry of unmistakably foreign origin."
Hereditary Titleholders of
Jewish Blood
(Editors Note. This book was
written in 1937 and was inserted in the Congressional Record in
August 1940. Because of the rapid inroads made into English
Nobility in the intervening years, only the total numbers of
Jewish lineage in each rank will be listed. The more a lineage
becomes intermarried with Jews the faster it becomes totally
Jewish. It is now almost 60 years since this book was written and
doubtless Jewish inroads into the aristocracy has considerably
increased.)
2 Dukes |
1 Baroness |
7 Marquis |
1 Dowager |
7 Earls |
53 Sirs |
17 Barons |
|
As though that were not enough,
the following noblemen and Baronets now holding their titles have
married women of Jewish blood; their heirs, if any by descent
from these, will be Jewish aristocrats.
1 Duke |
3 Viscounts |
2 2 Marquis |
10 Barons |
3 Earls |
22 Sirs |
We are convinced that if we
could get proof of certain facts regarding the relationships of
other titled families, we could more than double the above list.
Here is a "mixed
pickle" of Jewish relationships which we print, not because
these cases necessarily influence the titled people mentioned in
every instance, as some of them may detest the connection, but to
show how intimate the Jewish penetration has become (marriages or
Jewish connections, ed) the author gives the names of the
following and certain other details.
1 Duke |
11 Viscounts |
4 Marquis |
10 Barons |
10 Earls |
|
In many of the above cases, the
heir to the title is involved. Once more, we must emphasize how
incomplete the above list still is.
We do not know exactly how to
classify Baron Strabolgi, formerly Commander Kenworthy, Socialist
M.P. But the Daily telegraph of April 16, 1934 is less cautious
and includes him is a list of what it described as the
"leaders of the British Jewry".
Lord Strabolgi looks Jewish,
boosts the Jewish nation at every opportunity and reacts like a
Jew, and once was director of the European & Caucasian Export
& Import Co. Which as The Patriot
states, May 23, 1929 had a capital of 2,200 pounds and "could
be nothing but an intermediary between the Soviet that found the
banking security and the manufacturers who sold the goods."
Lord Marley is another baron
who appears to be a little shy as to his ancestry; Burke
(Peerage) simply reveals him to be the grandson of
George Joachim Aman. But Lord Marley's actions show that, what
ever he may be, he cannot regard it libelous to be described at
least as an "artificial Jew"' he spends much of his
time boosting Jews and Jew interests.
There are scores of other
"lords" who are far too shy to reveal even their
mother's names. Surely it is an important thing that the British
Democrat should know something of the origins of, say, Barons
Arnold, Passfield, and Snell, seeing that they hold prominent
positions in the affairs of our country.
Then there is Baron Ashfield,
whose father changed his name form Knaties to Stanley. This fact
is not given in Burkes Peerage, and we
should like to know if he was a Jew.
Have we not a right to know?
What is the use of a peerage
reference book which does not tell where Jewish blood comes in?
A Statement made by Mr. Shane
Leslie that Lord Curzon of Kedleston had a Jewish grandmother,
and repeated by B. Falk in He Laughed in Fleet Street has, we
understand from Mr. Leslie himself been withdrawn by him. We do
not know whether or not it should have been withdrawn.
For over 14 years she had
counted Lady Rothschild as her "best friend" ,said Lady
Snowden, on March 19 at the Jubilee appeal for the Jewish
Association for the Protection of Girls at Grosvenor House, Ark
Lane.
The Earls of Listowel and of
Warwick helped to direct the Jewish Daily Post
of London, which has since gone into liquidation.
According to the Jewish
Chronicle of May 10, Lord Winterton stated in the
House of Commons, May 7, that although he was not aware of any
Jewish blood among his ancestors, he would be very proud of it if
there was. Faugh!
Lady Diana Cooper's child had
as its godfather the late Otto Kahn, of Kuhn and Loeb & Co.
The Balfours, Cecils,
Churchills, Lyttons, Russell, and Stanleys seem to have a sort of
hereditary lack of Aryan good taste in favoring Jews.
Lady Patricia Moore, daughter
of the tenth Earl of Drogheda served as head of a committee of
the British Association of Maccabees in 1933, together with the
careerist, Mr. Randolph Churchill. This is an exclusively Jewish
National Organization and we do not know what these two were
doing there.
Adultery with Jews accounts for
certain cases where individuals of obvious Asiatic race suddenly
appear in old Aryan families of nobility. The usual chain of
circumstances in these cases was described in The
Fascist of May 1934, in an article called A
Side line of Usury. It is the greater scandal that
these cases may not here be advertised so that the Eurasian
progeny might be chivvied out of our British aristocracy, which
they must permanently contaminate.
These Jew-features cross-breeds
often further betray themselves by their instinctive leanings
toward Marxism and finance and by a preference and sympathy for
Jewish company and Jewish causes. They often live under the
perpetual shadow of Jewish blackmail. Generally speaking, when
people of Aryan family look like Jews, they are Jewish.
Knights of England
The list of Jewish knights
which follows gives no real idea of the Jewish contamination of
the once-prized honor of knighthood. It is far more difficult to
get at the ancestry of holders of non-hereditary titles than it
is of the others. It easier for your Jewish knight to camouflage
himself, and there is not doubt whatever that here are as many
Marrano Jews today in this country working for Jewry under
Christianized names and under the Christian religion as ever
there were in Spain and Portugal. We include in the list below
only names of living knights of undoubted Jewish blood; we know
there are scores of others, and we may be able to add to the list
in future editions, particularly if our readers will assist us in
the business of identification.
The appointments mentioned here
are either past or present ones.
Widows of Jewish knights. with
title of Lady.
So there is something
rotten in Denmark.
We ask our readers to join us
and to help rouse what is left of the great British Nation to
race-consciousness. No man or woman can escape the responsibility
which the knowledge given in this pamphlet forces upon them. The
tasks cannot be left to future generations, because every
generation will be more Judaized then the one before it. The
great Jew-wise reformer, William Cobbett thus addressed the
nobility of his day (about 1827) in his letter to the Nobility of
England: "You feel * * * that you are not the men your
grandfathers were; but your have come into your present state by
slow degrees, and therefore you cannot tell, even to yourselves,
not only how the change has come about, but you cannot tell what
sort of change it really is. However * * * when you reflect that
your grandfathers would as soon have thought of dining with a
chimney sweep than dining with a Jew or with any huckstering
reptile who has amassed money by watching the turn of the market;
that those grandfathers would have thought it no dishonor at all
to sit at table with farmers, or even with laborers, that they
would have shunned the usurious tribe of loan jobbers, and other
notorious changers of money as they would have shunned the
whirlwind or the pestilence.
Gentlemen, You have been warned
- keep troth
(Current engagements on going
to press: The Marquis of Queensberry's daughter to Count Bendem,
son of the new Jew Baron de Forest.)
Revised to November 30, 1937,
enlarged with addition of new names and removal of others.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/