CONSTITUTIONS AND PEOPLE POWER (Abridged)
How to Overcome Worldwide Tyranny
Introduction
This report discusses the nature of Constitutions, the relative merits of Constitutions, and what is required to make them work effectively, in order to preserve the freedoms of the people. It explains why no Constitution so far has ever protected its people from tyranny, and it notes some of the leaked thoughts of the people directly and primarily responsible for the abject failure of every Constitution on Earth.
It explains how one highly innovative and well designed Constitution escaped the attention of the de facto World Controllers at a time when their attention was otherwise engaged in momentous and horrendous plans. This Constitution, the Australian Constitution, either by chance or else by act of God (you decide which), provides a legal mechanism for overthrowing the entire pack of criminal de facto World Controllers, if the people of the world will, even if only temporarily, become well informed and abandon their current apathy.
Using the American Constitution as an example, it explains why the World Controllers desire republics, and it demonstrates terminal flaws in that Constitution. It also suggests the only lawful way in which American patriots can successfully oppose the tyranny being generated in their country by the World Controllers.
It points out that no single country can, by itself, even hope to succeed in opposing the de facto World Controllers and in restoring its traditional freedoms. In this instance there can be no doubt that it must be a matter of "One for all, and all for one" as immortalised in "The Three Musketeers".
The Nature of Constitutions
Constitutions are merely sets of words, either oral or written, which a group of people have agreed will be used to regulate the activities of their group. A Constitution can exist for a club, a nation, or a group of nations.
In itself, a Constitution is inanimate and powerless, and, like the British Constitution, it may not even exist in written form. A Constitution only acquires power with the consent and knowledgeable backing of the people whose activities it is designed to regulate. If the people concerned either do not understand or else are apathetic about the set of rules which are supposed to regulate the government of their group, then they automatically leave themselves vulnerable to tyranny from their appointed executive officers. This situation exists today, in every nation of Earth, even in Britain, Canada and Australia, but especially in the USA (see numerous Patriot sites on internet) and also Mendicant Israel (see web site JewsNotZionists).
Even a poor Constitution can provide a good living/working environment for a group, if the group are perpetually vigilant and assertive about ensuring their freedoms. The best Constitution that it is possible to design, will provide no protection at all for its people, if they are ill-informed or apathetic.
But the human species has consistently demonstrated that they, as a group, are either unwilling, or else are congenitally unable to maintain themselves in a constant state of arousal and informed vigilance. The majority are normally too busy going about their own personal business to worry about loftier legal matters. Usually, only a minority can rouse themselves to informed action, and only then when they see that things are going seriously wrong. Under such circumstances, an effective Constitution MUST make provision for the limitations of the human species, and MUST provide a set of checks and balances and appropriate severe penalties, which encourage those with Executive roles to obey the rules, and permit the more vigilant minority of group members to powerfully call to account those executives and administrators who deviate from their Constitutionally defined duties.
The Best Present Example of a Constitution
The Australian Constitution probably rates as the best yet produced by the human species, from the viewpoint of freedom for the people rather than freedom for the Executive. It was produced over a period of about twenty years (1880-1900) by people who were keenly aware of the failings of all existing Constitutions including that of Britain and the USA. They formulated it in the form of a perpetual written commercial contract between the people of Australia and a nominally immortal entity reputably skilled in the art of providing good government (see appendix). Other such contracts had been made by other nations, but not as written commercial contracts.
They also explicitly stated the only means by which that commercial contract might be lawfully altered and retained the right of approval of all Constitutional changes for the people themselves. They provided a useful set of checks and balances, which they presumably expected would be inadequate to stop the future tyranny that they had every cause to anticipate on the basis of past history. In anticipation of this eventuality, they did something totally new. They specified those conditions which would disbar a politician from lawfully holding his Parliamentary seat. They then made direct provision for mandatory, massive and bankrupting financial penalties to be extracted upon elected politicians by any and every concerned person in the world, in the event of Australian politicians causing breaches of the contract between the people and their lawfully appointed chief executive officer.
Through long-standing commercial law they also made indirect but mandatory bankrupting financial penalties to be extracted by any and every concerned person from the lawful master of those politicians, if that lawful chief executive officer or unlawful usurper of Executive authority did not keep his/her servants under control.
Though they had little choice in the matter, their selection of Victoria as the chief Contractor for supplying our good Government, provided many other tangible benefits that are not explicitly stated in the Written Constitution. There was no need to repeat them in the contract, because they automatically follow from that selection of a Chief Executive Officer. These benefits are the British entrenched law that the British monarchs have guaranteed for all time, to those who are subject to them.
The fact that we have contracted with the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and "her heirs and successors according to law", means that the legal requirements of the practical constitution go much further than what was superficially approved by the people of Australia in the referendum of 1900. The Sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland is legally bound to abide by certain other previous perpetual and thus never ending contracts made by her predecessors with her people. These include the Magna Carta of 1215, the Magna Carta of 1225 (in as much as it does not contradict the Magna Carta of 1215), and the Bill of Rights 1688 (in as much as it does not contradict the Magna Carta of 1215). The Magna Carta itself claims to be merely a codification of pre-existing British Common Law.
It should be noted that clause 61 of the Magna Carta of 1215 clearly states that "The King will not directly or indirectly do anything whereby these concessions may be revoked or diminished". Since the Sovereign’s consent is required to make or change any laws, the Magna Carta of 1215 is still binding on the British Sovereign today, regardless of whatever nonsense the present highly suspect legal profession may chose to teach. Furthermore, the Magna Carta of 1215 authorises the people subject to the British Monarchy to even go so far as to make war on the Sovereign in his own realm while ever he fails to uphold the terms of the Magna Carta.
It can rightly be argued from this fact, that the rebellion of the American people against the British Throne and its corrupt advisors, was legally authorised by the Magna Carta, and will continue to be so authorised until a lawful incumbent of the British Throne restores the traditional rights of his/her people, and cleanses his/her administration of all wrongdoers. Viewed in this light, the Magna Carta provides the American people with their sole legal right to take arms against their present totally corrupt government, a right that is certainly not granted them under their own terminally flawed Republican Constitution.
Chapter 1 of the later Magna Carta of 1225 states that "We have granted also, and given to all free men of our realm, for us and our heirs for ever, these liberties underwritten, to have and to hold to them and their heirs, of us and our heirs for ever.
Under these circumstances, any nation which contracts with a rightful heir or a lawful successor to the Sovereign of Great Britain and Ireland, also automatically acquires the full protection of the Magna Carta of 1215 plus the protection of the Magna Carta of 1225, British Common Law and the Bill of Rights 1688, in so far as they are consistent with the Magna Carta of 1215.
A de facto "High Court of Australia" was unconstitutionally created by the "Judiciary Bill 1903" as a retirement home for three persons, two of whom were involved in three separate (treasonous) breaches of the Australian Constitution, even before there had been an elected Federal Parliament, and in numerous subsequent breaches. The third of this illicit trio, Chief Justice Samuel Griffith, stated in 1905 : "The contention that a law of the Commonwealth is invalid because it is not in conformity with Magna Carta is not for serious refutation." He lied and dishonoured his de facto office.
Section 45 of the still valid Magna Carta of 1215 states that:
"The King will not appoint any judges, constables, sherrifs or baliffs, except such as know the law of the land and are willing to keep it well."
Since the legal doctrine has existed from at least the time of the Stuarts to the effect that "the sovereign can do no wrong", then any appointees of the Crown who break the law of MAGNA CARTA or the Australian Constitution, (which the sovereign is bound to keep into perpetuity), MUST BE DEEMED to be unlawfully holding their positions and are thus unable to legally act as agents of the Crown. This certainly applies to judges and politicians who merely act as agents of the Crown.
Despite these powerful innovations, that well designed contract that we made with Victoria was broken three times, before there was even an elected parliament. There was a complete silence on this matter by the news media, politicians, and the legal fraternity, thus indicating, in some measure at least, the extent of the treasonous conspiracy involved. The number of separate breaches since there has been an elected Australian parliament have multiplied as the Biblical stars in the sky and grains of sand on the beaches. As I stated previously, even the best Constitution it is possible to design, will provide no protection at all for its people, if they are ill-informed and/or apathetic.
A considerable effort has been made, from the very beginning, by a very powerful and ruthless, but quite small group of people, to ensure that the Australian people are ill informed and apathetic about our Constitution. This same effort has been made by the same group of people, to subvert the lawful government of every nation on Earth. The present republic of the United States of America, the recently deceased Soviet Union, the deceased League of Nations, the European Economic Community and the United Nations are all merely a part of their globe-spanning handiwork.
While there are obvious ways to greatly improve our Constitution, even in its present form it is quite able to provide a lawful way to regain our lost freedoms, and indeed the lost freedom of every nation, provided that the people, if only for a short time, will become well-informed, and discontinue their present state of apathy. I believe that no other Constitution on Earth has such potential power as does the Australian Constitution. A religious type might chose to believe that this is related to the fact that our Australian Constitution was formally placed under the protection of Almighty God at its very outset.
In what ways are the present Australian constitution not working?
(How did this come about? Is it due to a fundamental flaw in the
Constitution?)Our Constitution is quite explicit about allocation of Executive, Legislative and Judicial powers, and the separation of these three powers. In contempt of our Constitution, the iniquitous "Westminster System" of party politics has been imposed upon us, with its unconstitutional political parties, unconstitutional Cabinet and unconstitutional Prime Minister.
Executive power has been unlawfully seized by foresworn politicians who have clearly and consistently demonstrated that they owe their primary allegiance to a foreign monetary power, and not to their designated Chief Executive Officer, our Queen and her Viceroy. This, of course, automatically disbars them from office under the clear terms of the Australian Constitution.
Legislative power has been unlawfully brought under the control of the usurping executive officers.
Judicial power has been unlawfully controlled by party politics and now has been proven by one of our number (John Wilson) to give its primary allegiance to a foreign monetary power.
Oral traditions of an unlawfully created High Court with its rulings that defy Constitutional law, an unlawfully created Family Court, and illicit treaties with the United Nations have all been used to over-ride the Australian Constitution, and our perpetually entrenched law such as the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1688, and British Common Law.
An overwhelming avalanche of faulty, incomprehensible and unlawful legislation has been passed by politicians who are not qualified, under our Constitution, to hold their Parliamentary seats, and who certainly, are incompetent to make or review legislation.
The present lawfully appointed Chief Executive Officer, our Queen (Elizabeth II), has consistently refused (in writing) to carry out her sworn duty, as have her predecessors so refused since the time of Victoria. She needs to be replaced by someone more knowledgeable and diligent, who will perform his/her contractural duties, just as we would routinely replace any other Chief Contractor who was lacking in due diligence.
This horrendous situation has arisen, not primarily because of any flaws in the written and unwritten Australian Constitution. It exists because a relatively small, powerful and ruthless pack of murderous criminals, created and maintain absolute control of a monetary system that is based on Grand Fraud, a heinous international crime in which the governments of every nation of Earth have become active subordinates. This seemingly bottomless hoard of wealth at their exclusive disposal has given these criminals an all but total control of the news media, the theatre, academia and the legal fraternity. Through their monopoly of these propaganda outlets, and the avarice and treason of politicians, they have progressively subverted the lawful governments of the whole world, and they are now the de facto rulers of the entire globe.
The modus operandi of these conspirators is documented extensively in a leaked document of their’s known as the Protocols, a document first recorded as appearing in the hands of a Freemason in 1884, published extensively in Russia in 1905 and with a copy placed in the British Museum on August 10, 1906. There have been plenty of subsidiary leaks (both before and after its release) to back up this prophetic document, which foreshadows the creation of the United Nations organisation by the international bankers. I have written an as yet unpublished book which deals extensively with this very subject.
Who is directly responsible for the perceived failures of all Constitutions?
Let us first look at who is directly and primarily responsible for our present peril, by examining a small selection of the extensive information that was leaked to us in 1884 in the document we have just referred to that is known as the "Protocols".
Protocols 2,2
"The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world."
Protocols 2,5
"In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press
that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the GOYIM States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands."
Protocols 3,2
"The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The GOYIM are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots - the kings on their thrones - are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power.
. . . . . . . . . . We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart."
Protocols 3,3
"In order to incite seekers after power to a misuse of power we have set all forces in opposition one to another, breaking up their liberal tendencies towards independence. To this end we have stirred up every form of enterprise, we have armed all parties, we have set up authority as a target for every ambition. Of States we have made gladiatorial arenas where a lot of confused issues contend .... A little more, and disorders and bankruptcy will be universal ...."
Protocols 5,1
"What form of administrative rule can be given to communities in which corruption has penetrated everywhere, communities where riches are attained only by the clever surprise tactics of semi-swindling tricks; where looseness reigns: where morality is maintained by penal measures and harsh laws but not by voluntarily accepted principles: . . . ."
Protocols 5,7
". . . . . . . . . . . Nowadays it is more important to disarm the peoples than to lead them into war: more important to use for our advantage the passions which have burst into flames than to quench their fire: more important to eradicate them. The principal object of our directorate consists in this: to debilitate the public mind by criticism; to lead it away from serious reflections calculated to arouse resistance; to distract the forces of the mind towards a sham fight of empty eloquence."
Protocols 5,10
"In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the "goyim" lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first secret."
Protocols 6,6
"At the same time we must intensively patronize trade and industry, but, first and foremost, speculation, the part played by which is to provide a counterpoise to industry: the absence of speculative industry will multiply capital in private hands and will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land from indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is that industry should drain off from the land both labour and capital and by means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the world, and thereby throw all the GOYIM into the ranks of the proletariat. Then the GOYIM will bow down before us, if for no other reason but to get the right to exist."
Protocols 9,9
"In order to annihilate the institutions of the GOYIM before it is time we have touched them with craft and delicacy, and have taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. These springs lay in a strict but just sense of order; we have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism. We have got our hands
into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence."
Protocols 10,10
"Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the GOYIM, namely, Despotism; and a constitution, as you well know, is nothing else but a school of discords, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims - In a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of State activity. The tribune of the "talkeries" has, no less effectively than the press, condemned the rulers to inactivity and impotence, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. then it was that the era of republics become possible of realization; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government - by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, or slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the GOY people, I should rather say, under the GOY peoples."
Protocols 10,19 (On creation of a United Nations)
"But you yourselves perfectly well know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases, by want, so that the "goyim" see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."
Protocols 10,4
"When we have accomplished our coup d'etat we shall say then to the various peoples: "Everything has gone terribly badly, all have been worn out with suffering. we are destroying the causes of your torment - nationalities, frontiers, differences of coinages. You are at liberty, of course, to pronounce sentence upon us, but can it possibly be a just one if it is confirmed by you before you make any trial of what we are offering you." ... then will the mob exalt us and bear us up in their hands in a unanimous triumph of hopes and expectations. Voting, which we have made the instrument which will set us on the throne of the world by teaching even the very smallest units of members of the human race to vote by means of meetings and agreements by groups, will then have served its purposes and will play its part then for the last time by a unanimity of desire to make close acquaintance with us before condemning us."
Protocols 10,5
"To secure this we must have everybody vote without distinction of classes and qualifications, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes. In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the GOYIM the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents set at its head by us as leaders of the mob. The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits."
So these are some of the thoughts of the people who are directly and primarily responsible for our present worldwide peril; the people who have complete sovereignity over the world’s present fraudulent monetary system, and have de facto sovereignity over the world. They are scrupulously identified in my recently completed but as yet unpublished book.
Who is Also Responsible for the Failure of the Australian Constitution?
Let us now look for those with secondary responsibility for our present tyrannous government in Australia. When the Ship of State founders, it is well established that the higher the executive authority, the more responsible is that person for the disaster.
So next down the line of responsibility for our present problems is the captain, our lawful Chief Executive Officer, Queen Elizabeth II and her predecessors, back to William and Mary of Orange. This initial pair (William and Mary) unlawfully assumed executive power in Britain with the assistance of the Money Lenders, and immediately granted permission for the creation of the privately owned Bank of England, to which they rapidly indebted their nation. All subsequent monarchs of their line have deferred to the Money Lenders, and have either actively or tacitly supported their depredations.
Next down the line of responsibility are the politicians who unlawfully seized Executive power, the legal fraternity, the Freemasons, the Church of England, academia and the news media etc etc who all supported them in their highly illicit activities.
Last, but by no means least, are ourselves and our ancestors who through disinterest and apathy (however brought about) have allowed a band of rogues and murderous cut-throats to seize executive power over us.
Are the perceived failures of the Australian Constitution terminal?
There is no simple answer to this question.
The perceived failures of our lawful Australian Constitution are certainly not terminal. But without positively directed and wisely co-ordinated action to oppose the unlawful usurpation of power over us, the present situation is indeed terminal. Even a perfectly conceived and perfectly written Constitution is useless, if it is not backed by the will of an informed and activist population.
If we Australians all become aware of the true nature of our Constitution, and of the way in which it has been subverted by a foreign power and:
If we Australians then accept a new, lawfully arisen, well informed and activist Chief Executive Officer to fulfil the functions allocated to him/her in the Constitution and:
If we Australians give that executive officer our full backing and:
If we Australians utilise the full resources and armaments that we, as a people, still retain, and we lawfully depose the present usurpers and:
If our armed forces and police forces abide by their oaths of loyalty to Australia’s lawful Chief Executive Officer and:
If we can manage to make the people of the world aware of our present problems and our lawful solution to them and:
If the people of the world utilise the lawful measures made available to them through the Australian Constitution to depose worldwide the de facto World Controllers and their fellow travellers:
Then the present situation is not terminal, and, incidentally, the new Chief Executive Officer for Australia will lawfully also be the legally defined Sovereign of Great Britain and Ireland.
Even if all Australians agreed on the best possible form of government for ourselves, and legally established such a government, would the World Controllers permit us to persist with such a government?
The simple answer is "No!" The blue berets of the police force that the criminal World Controllers have created within their organisation (known to us as the United Nations) will be used to overwhelm us and to impose upon us the government that the Money Lenders intend us to have.
This is certain unless we can manage to make the people of the world aware of our present problems and of our lawful solution to them and:
If the people of the world utilise the lawful measures made available to them through the Australian Constitution and British law to depose worldwide the de facto World Controllers and their fellow travellers.
Are the Perceived Failures of All Other Constitutions Terminal?
The simple answer is "Yes!"
All other constitutions, and especially Republican Constitutions, have been fatally flawed from their very conception. They were deliberately made that way by paid agents of the Money Lenders. They are only pieces of paper specifying how things ought to be, without any legal teeth and claws to ensure that the guilty pay, in the event of a public awakening to the spectre of rampant tyranny in their own country.
The British Constitution showed the way, with the Magna Carta as entrenched law, but the Australian Constitution introduced the concept of a written commercial contract with a supplier of good government, and with mandatory punitive damages awarded against politicians who defy the Constitution. Only the Australian Constitution grants true legal and economic power to the people that can be used against the real enemies of mankind. This is probably because Australia was regarded as too insignificant for the Money Lenders to worry about, back in 1880 to 1900. Besides, from 1884 onwards, they seemingly had much bigger fish to fry, as explained in my as yet unpublished book. They were preparing for World Wars 1 and 2, the Russian Revolution, the United Nations and the creation of modern weapons of mass destruction.
What about the Constitution of the USA?
Let us look at what the politically astute writers of the Protocols have to say about Republics and Presidents. Like Machieavelli, they are very astute political analysts. And they are quite correct in these assessments. It is their objectives and morals that I usually disagree with, though just occasionally, like all mortals, their assessments are distorted by wishful thinking..
Protocols 10,10
. . . . . . . . The tribune of the "talkeries" has, no less effectively than the press, condemned the rulers to inactivity and impotence, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. Then it was that the era of republics become possible of realization; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government - by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, or slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the GOY people, I should rather say, under the GOY peoples."
Protocols 3,2
"The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The GOYIM are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots - the kings on their thrones - are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power.
. . . . . . . . . . We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart."
Past experience indicates that the vast majority of the population, including the Americans, cannot meet the needs of the American dictum that "Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom." Past and present experience indicates that when government starts to go badly astray, even then only a small minority will start to question and resist its breaches of fundamental law.
As the Protocols so clearly state, an elected head of state is a joke, a buffoon; not somebody to be taken seriously. Has anybody who has seriously watched the actions of American Presidents ever found any evidence to the contrary?
Since any large group of people clearly need a chief executive officer, they need to take great care in selecting him or her. A true specialist is needed, not somebody who merely bribes voters to elect him.
Even modern psychology is reluctantly admitting that specialists are largely a product of hereditary and only to a much lesser extent the product of training. The writers of the Protocols make much of how they have driven a wedge between the people and those who should have executive ability on the basis of their hereditary. I believe that they have failed to allow for the dispersion of Executive genes away from the propertied classes by a variety of means (not always out of wedlock).
Be that as it may. Available evidence suggests that the very best Chief Executive Officer material is likely to be a product of both hereditary and life-long training. It is such a line of people that should be entrenched as chief executive officers by the idealised Constitution. So, I believe that any idealised Constitution would incorporate itself as a Constitutional Monarchy.
Because absolute power has been shown to corrupt the very best of humans, the Constitutional Monarchy should exist in the form of a legally enforceable commercial contract between the people and their chosen lineage of Chief Executive Officers. That contract must specify the terms and conditions under which we have agreed to be governed, and the only lawful means by which that contract may be changed. Only by consensus between a significant majority of the people and their designated chief Executive Officer, should that contract be capable of being changed.
Since the Executive Authority has been placed in the hands of the Chief Executive Officer, all agents of the government, whether executive, legislative, judicial, administrative, lawkeeping and military, must be guaranteed loyal to and accountable to him/her so long as he/she obey the laws of the land.
Nevertheless, the Chief Executive Officer as the chief contractor, must be fully responsible to the people for the actions of himself/herself and all of his/her sub-contractors. There must be severe penalties for any contractor, or any member of the public, who fail to carry out their lawfully defined duties. Furthermore, in the absence of right action by the lawful Chief Executive Officer, any member of the public MUST be able to call a contractor/sub-contractor to account for wrongdoings.
There is much to be said for the people choosing their own representatives to be involved in lawmaking, and in some lesser executive roles, as indeed is provided for in the Australian Constitution. But such persons must meet minimum requisite selection criteria for the function they are to undertake, just as would anybody else for any other position in the real world. Would you appoint a car mechanic to perform brain surgery upon yourself or a loved one, no matter how good he may be as a car mechanic, or how eloquent he may be? Are good government and wise lawmaking for an entire nation any less important an occupation than that of brain surgeon?
In essence, the present Australian Constitution is only a few steps away from the idealised form that we would be wise to construct now, if it did not exist at all. The Australian Constitution was approved by a majority of the lawfully designated electors in each state, before the Commonwealth of Australia was even formed.
The American Constitution, by contrast, does not include even the most fundamental of safeguards, and I can find no record of its ever having been approved by the American people at a Referendum. Encyclopedia Britannica merely states that it was framed in 1797 and "adopted" in 1789. As in the case of all republics, it seems that the victors, not the people, decided the rules on how the people would be governed by those who had gained power over them. This is an important legal point, that adds to an argument that can be used to permit American patriots to lawfully depose the tyranny that currently exists in their nation. Let us look now at the provisions, and lack of provisions, in the American Constitution..
The Archtypal American Republican Constitution
How well do Republican Constitutions protect the people from accumulations of governmental power in the hands of an unscrupulous few? Usually not very well at all! After all, France has had five different Republican Constitutions in the last two centuries. Republican Constitutions, which have become increasingly in vogue over the last 150 years, are generally exemplified by that of the USA, which is only a few pages long, and was established not as a contract, but as a law supposedly made in the name of the people alone. Its principal requirements are:
1) The election of an autonomous Legislature of two separate Houses of Congress over which the Chief Executive (President) has very little power and nobody else has any.
2) Self regulation is the sole means provided to control behaviour of the members of the legislature who, as a group, are effectively sovereign entities owing no Constitutionally required allegiance to anyone at all. (there is no Constitutionally defined recourse available to the people in the event of the legislature acting unlawfully)
3) The legislature may make laws in only specified areas of concern for it. (which provision it has, of course, quite safely ignored).
4) The periodic election of a Chief Executive (President) to manage Executive government for a fixed term of four years (Such a political party official is not free to act without fear or favour, and he certainly has vested interests to protect. He brings with him many unspoken obligations to individuals who helped him to get elected. He automatically brings with him no entrenched law such as the Magna Carta, British Common Law, or the bill of Rights. These ‘rights’ are purely optional for the judiciary of the USA)
5) The President swears to protect the Constitution of the USA ( This is a basically unenforceable provision since it is not a legal contract between two consenting parties. What steps can the people take if he breaks his oath? None!)
6) Impeachment of the President for wrongdoing may only be done by the Lower House (or House of Representatives) and his trial, if impeached, is by the Senate. (So only biased people with vested interests in political parties are permitted to correct wrong-doing by the President. There is no recourse directly available to the people in the event of a President acting unlawfully and Congress refusing to act)
7) There is provision for the appointment of a nominally independent judiciary (with no inbuilt way for the people to deal with corrupt members)
8) The Judiciary (judges) can be dismissed for wrongdoing only by joint action of the legislature and the Chief Executive (so they are practically above the law).
9) The Constitution makes no provision for the methods by which it may lawfully be changed, and since the Constitution does not recognise the people of the USA as a legally involved participant in the government of the nation (except at elections), Congress took it upon itself to determine that it would propose Constitutional changes and that the governments of the States, rather than the people, could ratify them
10) Since the Magna Carta is not entrenched Law within the American Constitution, and since the Constitution certainly does not grant them the right, the American people have no legal right to challenge a lawbreaking government by force of arms, no matter how advanced may be the state of tyranny that exists in their nation. Their only lawful recourse provided by their Constitution, is to challenge the corrupt government through a corrupt legal system. This they have, not surprisingly, found to be an exercise in futility. Their only lawful way to take arms against an increasingly out of control tyranny in their own country is to make recourse to the provisions of the Magna Carta and to claim that the American Revolution was merely a lawfully sanctioned mechanism for bringing their lawful British Sovereign to acknowledge their traditional and entrenched freedoms, within his/her greater realm.
The USA Constitution differs from almost all other republican models in that it specifies Federal governmental controls for what is now a group of fifty separate semi-autonomous states, each with a similar Constitution, and each with a separate elected chief executive. This attempt at a balancing of governmental power between numerous separate entities in the States and in the Federation of States has probably been responsible for making the Constitution of the USA more durable than any other republican Constitutions. Nevertheless, this balance is merely the result of jockeying for power between a host of separate governmental bullies, not a proper balance of power between the executive and the people.
This Constitution of the USA embodies no built in controls on the exercise of governmental powers, except for those employed internally by the government itself. It permits the de facto powers of government to be continually increased with time, without the people’s consent. Each increase in governmental power makes it even easier to make the next increase. In engineering terms, this is a classical positive feedback control loop without a balancing negative feedback loop. It creates a snowballing action which progressively disempowers the people of the USA, and at an accelerating rate. It is a good Constitution for a few powerful persons who lust for absolute power. It is a very bad Constitution for the preservation of the people’s freedoms, as experience over the last two centuries has shown.
Conclusions:
We have now objectively and dispassionately analysed the nature of Constitutions in general, and in particular one that is fundamentally sound and one which is fatally flawed. We have noted that even the best Constitution currently in operation is useless unless it is backed by the power of an informed and activist population. It is nevertheless possible to frame a Constitution which can successfully function to protect freedoms, in the real world where only a minority ever become informed and activist, in the face of growing governmental tyranny.
A properly framed and established Constitutional Monarchy offers the best protection for a people’s freedom, and a Republic offers no protection for a people’s freedom, regardless of the ceaseless propaganda and brainwashing engaged in by the de facto World Controllers, to make people believe that it does.
It is a matter of historic fact that the American Revolution was actively fought by only about three percent of the American people, and it was these people who wrote and imposed the American Republican Constitution on the American people. It is also historic fact that the Russian Revolution was actively fought by only about three percent of the Russian people and it was these people who wrote the Russian Republican Constitution and imposed it upon the Russian people. The creed of the Russian revolutionaries is well established, but the creed of the American revolutionaries is much less well established, and masked by the passage of time.
The existence of a small group of World Controllers is indisputable, and they have an agenda for a One World Government in which nobody but themselves has any freedom. This One World Government already has its Constitution, a constitution which is likely to be imposed upon us very soon, and quite possibly this year (i.e. AD 2000).
If the people of this earth do not immediately cease to idolise those who have always actively worked against them to enslave them (whether knowingly or unknowingly) , and the people of this Earth do not immediately become very well informed of the dire reality they face and become extremely activist as well, then they have only themselves to blame for the inevitable consequences of their apathy. The inevitable consequences to them all are death or harsh and unremitting slavery, coupled with a total loss of all that they presently possess.
John A Harris 18th January, 2000
USEFUL REFERENCES WRITTEN BY AUTHOR John A Harris
Booklets
In Contempt of Our Constitution ISBN 0 646 16573 9
Hands Off Our Constitution ISBN 0 646 16572 0
Money Conjured Out of Thin Air ISBN 0 646 16574 7
Reports
A Layman’s Guide to The Australian Constitution
Proposed Changes to The Australian Constitution
A Hypothetical Log of Claims for the First Australian Born King
of Great Britain and Ireland
The Fuse is Short and Burning
New World Order Planned Constitution
Constitution evaluation for Inverell Forum Workshop
Videos
An Advanced Layman’s Guide to the Australian Constitution 55 min
A Layman’s Guide to Money and Banks 1hr 55min
A Layman’ Guide to the Australian Constitution - SECTION 46 1hr 17min
OTHER USEFUL REFERENCES
"The Constitution - as altered to 31 October 1986" [Australian]
"Banks and Judges" by John Wilson
"The Protocols of Zion"
"The World Conquerors" by Louis Marschalko
"Non Dare Call it Conspiracy" by Gary Allen with Larry Abraham
"Proofs of a Conspiracy" by John Robinson 1798
"Magna Charta - Its continuing importance in our lives today " by
Committee of the Australian Constitutional Education Campaign Fund
"The Longest Hatred - An Examination of Anti-Gentilism" by Inter-city Researchers
"Lucky Be Damned" by John Cumming
Innumerable Web Sites accessed through Liberty Australia http://www.webaxs.net/~noel/
APPENDIX 1
The Requirements for a Valid Contract
"Australian Mercantile Law" - Yorston and Fortesque - define the essentials of a valid contract in the following terms. "A valid contract is an agreement made between two or more parties, whereby legal rights and obligations are created which the law will enforce." In order that rights may be acquired and obligations incurred under a contract certain "essential elements" must be present or else the contemplated contract will be invalid. The essential elements are:
The intention of the parties to create a legal relationship
An offer by one party and its acceptance by the other
Valuable consideration or execution under seal or (in some instances) valuable consideration plus some written record
Legal capacity of the parties to act
A genuine consent by the parties
Legality of the objects of the agreement
Were the Requirements for a Valid Contract Met With Respect to Our Contract with the British Sovereign For Providing For Our Good Government?
Offer and acceptance?
The offer by one party of the task of Executive Government and its acceptance by the other is verified in the third to seventh paragraphs of the Constitution: "Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
1) This Act may be cited as the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
. . . 4) The Commonwealth shall be established, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth shall take effect, on and after the day so appointed.
Valuable consideration or execution under seal?
"Valuable consideration or execution under seal" was met as was "valuable consideration plus some written record" The valuable consideration for the Queen was the prerogatives of her office while for the citizens of Australia the valuable consideration was the good government of their nation, according to the terms that they had set out in the contract.
The proclamation of the establishment of the Commonwealth of Australia was approved and signed by Queen Victoria at the Court at Balmoral on the 17th day of September, 1900, thus providing both the seal and the written record
Legal capacity of the parties to act?
The legal capacity of the Australian people to act is unquestionable, being a free people.
The legal capacity of the Queen to act is also unquestionable, she being a Sovereign Lady.
A genuine consent by the parties? The terms of the Constitution make it clear that the Constitutional Contract was entered into freely by both parties to the Contract.
Legality of the objects of the agreement? It would be difficult to fault the legality of two parties entering into a contract requiring one party to provide good government for the other, under clearly specified terms.
Conclusion
So, we can conclude with certainty that ALL of the requirements for a valid commercial contract were met with respect to the document known as the Australian Constitution. It is very likely that no other Constitution in the world provides such protection, unless it be perhaps the Constitution of Canada or New Zealand. It is certain that no other Constitution in the world provides for disloyal politicians paying massive and mandatory punitive damages to every single person on this earth, if they demand them.
This contractural clause specifying massive punitive damages (Section 46) even provides, under long established commercial law, a routine means to replace a lawful chief executive, who has proven to be either unable or unwilling to carry out their sworn and bounden duty to the people with respect to upholding all of the terms of their joint contract.
J.A.Harris 27/03/1999 constitu.htm