THE HUMAN CHOICE



A 
NON-DENOMINATIONAL 
REPORT ON 
THE CHRISTIAN ALTERNATIVE
                          




                   Presented by: Alan Gourley 



Published by First & Last Christian Publishing
PO Box Q381,  SYDNEY  2000,  AUSTRALIA 
First edition October 1994
ISBN 0 9588651 9 1
DEDICATION


To the Spirit of Truth




Happy those to whom truth is not a stumbling block.



THE HUMAN CHOICE
LIMITED EDITION
2000 COPIES

Copyright   A. Gourley



Quotation is allowed so long as the usual moral conventions, such as acknowledging the source and keeping quotes in their original form and context, are observed. 

This book has not been commercialized, it is sold by mail order. 
Postage paid Australia $8.50. Enquiries and orders to:
		C.H.P .S.
		PO Box Q381,  SYDNEY  NSW  2000 
		AUSTRALIA

Preliminary works by this author include:
		How to Avoid the Looming Catastrophe
		Democracy and Treason in Australia
		Assault on Childhood
		Saving the Future
		BRAIN-WASH

Published by:
		First & Last Christian Publishing,
		PO Box Q381
		SYDNEY  NSW  2000  AUSTRALIA
		ISBN 0 9588651 9 1

"Come, wander with me," she said,
"Into regions yet untrod;
And read what is still unread
In the manuscripts of God."

And he wandered away and away
With nature, the dear old nurse,
Who sang to him night and day
The rhymes of the universe.


Longfellow
From "The 50th Birthday of Agassiz" 



THE HUMAN CHOICE       



PROLOGUE
The way to life ...

Books usually begin with, or have on their covers, some description of the talents or authority of the author.  If you are a person who believes that those in positions of acclaim and authority tell you the honest truth about matters basic to social welfare then it is likely you may be too trusting to read this book; yet you may find such reading very helpful.
Those looking for an improved understanding of life, but without time for long research, can expect to be delighted.
This writing must stand on its own merits and you should judge it for yourself; your life is too important to leave to the decisions of others.  
What is attempted here is done with concern and compassion and, I believe, with guidance.  It is not a simple commercial production.  As an editorial advice may I suggest you try not to become bogged down with questions raised in this prologue because you may well find your questions or fears resolved in their allotted section.  

Comment in this book is compatible with Christian Revelation and science based on established principles.
A TV DEBATE
On the eve of Good Friday, 1994, an arranged debate on the relevance of Christianity was presented on Australian ABC TV.  Three people of Christian profession were chosen as foil to a run-of-the-mill presenter.
A reasonable program of its kind; three people of related but differing opinion being encouraged to air their views.
It appeared that all regarded the resurrection as the basic tenet of Christian faith, at the same time having varying degrees of faith or doubt as to the reality of it, the thoughts of other members of the panel and the teaching of Christianity in general.
Next to the resurrection they considered important, but much less important, the virgin birth.  Their depth of belief in such Christian fundamentals was, shall we say, tentative.  It was not a program to encourage either understanding or faith.
My own study - which I call "My search for truth" - goes back many years.  Forty years ago the theory of evolution by chance was being presented as the scientifically correct view of life's creation.  Around that time I was still searching for a truly rational base for my life.  Was the taught science correct?  Did life have meaning?  Could I really do just as I liked or did I have a moral responsibility to some ongoing life purpose?  
For a young man with all the desires and ambitions of a young man, this was a very important question.
At that time I was living in Sydney and able to make use of the excellent State Public Library.  I decided it was time to get really serious about this question and make a study of evolution theory and its surrounds.  If I had hopes of being set free by this study I was in for disappointment.
The first books I chose seemed to me to be shallow and unconvincing, in fact self-contradictory.  Perhaps I was not reading the best books!  I set out to make sure that my reading did include literature used by universities but found here the same shallow ocean of social fixations based on vaporising illusions.
Advanced thinkers had already described "survival of the fittest" as tautology.  It was what we today might call a "Clayton's" theory: the kind of theory you accept when you don't want a real theory.  Survival of the fittest means that the fittest survive.  Why do they survive?  Because they are the fittest!  Why are they the fittest?  Because they survive!  Why is the sun hot?  Because it emits heat!  Why does it emit heat?  Because it's hot!  Circular reasoning; statements of the obvious going nowhere.
Creation by chance has never been a scientific theory; it was never more than an idea idolised by some because it offered what escapists wanted to hear.  It was (as we shall see) never able to be brought into line with scientific fact or logical reason despite huge, expensive effort and massive propaganda.
Although the theory had, at that time, already been exposed as unscientific and intellectually fraudulent, each such challenge went unanswered; human desire had overcome and replaced the search for truth; 'politically correct', although perhaps not then openly acknowledged, had arrived. The establishment had no answers.  There are no answers; the establishment maintained its stance by the simple device of ignoring all who exposed the unscientific and irrational nature of a belief promoted and designed specifically for the purpose of achieving a social engineering program.  
From that time on the education system has taught chance created evolution as though unchallenged scientific fact.  It was able to do this because the educated (most importantly the mass media owned by the establishment) has supported the educators.  
To me, as an uncommitted investigator, it soon became clear that creation by chance evolution was a fake.
If an independent study of chance creation provided no answer to the "creation" puzzle, was religion also as shallow and unrealistic as its public face then seemed to suggest?
I deliberately left Christian religion to last.  I looked at other religions and acclaimed gurus.  What I found revealed fashion and some excellent "good common sense" but not much else.  
Then to Christianity.
Contrary to common opinions and teachings, the resurrection and virgin birth were not of immediate importance to my investigation; that was story, I was looking for evidence.
Acts of the Apostles, Paul, Letters, these are stories of people - the reactions of mankind - perhaps of human interest but not proof of a special status for Jesus.
The Old Testament is more interesting and revealing but still relies heavily on the credibility of story-tellers, translators and interpreters.  It points to, but does not prove, who Jesus of Nazareth really was.  Only in the Gospels do we get close to the Master himself.
As members on the ABC program were at pains to point out, the New Testament was written long after the events it described and in a language foreign to that used by Jesus.  Worse, it had to be again translated to reach us in English.  We cannot expect the Gospels to be accurate in detail and different editions of the Holy Bible bear this out.  Memory, translations and editing by zealous people ensure discrepancies.
So far as new understanding is concerned, that TV program made  no public advance on my reading on this subject many years earlier.  Although the scriptures may not be accurate in all details, substance, even honesty, is not strong when Christianity is presented today.
So what is left?  
Those of us with the experience of age and aware of the degree of imperfect memory common to the human kind, are aware that, when acclaimed people speak, certain phrases stand out and are repeated and remembered.  An American president visits Australia - a throw-away line, "run over the bastards" is picked up.  "All the way with LBJ" is remembered long after the substance of the visit is forgotten.  Bob Hawke's "silly old bastard" will still be recalled when Bob is dead.  In the short term it is the demeaning trivia that is most often remembered; in the long term it is the wise quotes that survive.
So what we seek is the unforgettable comment in an age where, with no popular access to writing, memory was more important and far more seriously practised than today.
To me the significance of Jesus impressed itself in just a few comments.  Most easily to mind is, I am the way; I am the truth and I am life; no one comes to the Father except by me. John 14:6.
What is so important about that comment?  Firstly, what He is saying is: I represent the truth of life, no one comes to the ultimate life except through devotion to the truth of life.
And what is important about that?  To me, what is important about that is that it is true.  No one can expect to advance life (their own or life as a whole) except by keeping as close as possible to the truth of life.  Truth is the reality!
The truth of life (which includes everyday truth) should be treated as an object of worship by anyone wanting to achieve something worthy of life.  Achievement based on fantasy, like a dream, has no lasting value.  The way to life is through truth.  These matters will be explored more fully later.
Jesus was not saying that we should worship Him, what He was saying was that we should worship truth.  From the harvest of truth we reap justice, mercy and the fruit of life's rewards.
But that is not all this comment tells us!  Although an honestly reasoning person should be able to see the significance of His statement just as clearly as seeing the insignificance of the tautologies relating to the evolution myth, what should intrigue us is that the meaning of that statement by Jesus has not been understood and widely taught even to this day.
For anyone to present that simple truth so dramatically that it would be noted accurately in memory while its meaning is not fully appreciated, makes it a far more significant event; in fact outstanding.  Also the structure of the statement takes its memory beyond the reach of both the manipulative scribe and the storyteller - it therefore remains functionally legitimate.  It is (as we shall see) combinations of this kind that mark Jesus as a superior person.
We have here a classic example of the (other-worldly) insight of Jesus into the true nature and instincts of mankind.
Why is plain truth so difficult for us to see or accept?  Why do we prefer to ignore or try to reject the chains that support life as though these supports are an insult?  Why do we prefer that ultimate of humanist attitudes, 'cutting off our noses to spite our faces'?  
But without doubt we do!
It is clear that mankind has, within Christian times, preferred to believe either that he is God and beholden to no power or plan beyond self or, that he is the slave of powers beyond his influence.  When not able to believe he is God then mankind has been servile to the point of robotic; chaining body and mind to restrictive and often farcical beliefs.
The self-destructive pride that leads us to seeing ourselves as either gods or slaves has now culminated in the desire to be gods as reflected in the teaching of humanism as though it were science.  This teaching can be seen as being part of a project to socially engineer mankind to serve a puny man-made ideology in service to a puny egocentric elite.
False teaching, to enlarge human ego (as any confidence trickster knows) can go a long way toward blinding and seducing us to ignore natural truth, even (or perhaps especially) if the truth is so simple as should be intellectually obvious in today's state of understanding.  
The simple statement that life is an intelligent creation and that all lasting benefits we may get from life must depend on our ability to appreciate the true nature of life, is of infinitely greater importance than any story of miraculous accomplishment or adventure that could be made up by a story-teller of the time.
If a simple story-teller could uncover what were then (and are even now to most) real secrets of life, then that story-teller would not be a simple story-teller and his wisdom would be noted down, remembered and discussed.  Such a story-teller would not waste life to create fantasies.
So it is not just the wisdom of those words, "I am the way .." that make them stand out, it is that they are opposed to the way in which mankind prefers to see himself.  Mankind does not want to see the relevance of such statements!
Mankind does not want to be restricted by the reality of a created truth but wants to imagine that he can re-create himself to suit himself; or, if he must accept an intelligent creator, then to be a slave in a sterile servility for which he can deny all responsibility.
Mankind wants either an all-powerful God leaving no more than trivia to the human will or he wants the glory of designing his own future free of admitting even those restraints imposed by the structure of life itself.  The combination of a creator-God and personal responsibility is not easily acceptable.
Knowing the unacceptability of the natural truth of life to mankind in general, and the simple limits of human understanding at that time, the intriguing nature of a speaker's insight (revealed in the need to cloak the meaning of His message) is again revealed in the way in which this cloaking is achieved.
No other religion - no other acclaimed wise teacher that I had then read (or have since read or heard of) has been able to make  statements of such simple basic importance and realize a need to cloak truth so neatly that its importance would be invisible to the majority until its time had come.
When we search for evidence of superior identity, human wisdom and adventure stories are not enough!  Jesus could say: Take the plank out of your own eye before you complain of the speck in the viewpoint of another;  and Khrisnamurti may say: the cause and the subject of suffering is yourself.  But these are human levels of wisdom understandable and acceptable to humans of the time.  All of us may not be learned in such elements of wise living, or be sufficiently self-disciplined to make use of their benefits, but they represent conventional wisdom such as appears in many cultures and religions.
But just imagine, for instance, had Jesus said, "The earth is round."  It would, at that time, have also demonstrated an other- worldly understanding of the universal reality, but would people have treated it as anything but an interesting (or incredible) irrelevancy?  They wanted mystical, not scientific, guidance.  Their culture had not yet advanced sufficiently for them to appreciate scientific understanding.
Further, even if it had been said and noted, what chance would it have had of getting into a Bible assembled years later?  Buckley's, I would think.  Everyone, at that time, 'knew' that the world was flat; the young church would not have such faith in its leader as to risk scorn by promoting such a challenge to the accepted view of worldly reality.  In the event however, having adopted the worldly belief of its time, it then became difficult for the worldly church to accept the later advance of science and suffered the consequences in loss of both face and faith. 
The pride, fears and lack of faith of mankind were again demonstrated when the church, having made a fool of itself by first accepting a worldly view and then having to try to resist the advance of worldly science - and losing, had then not the faith to back Christianity when the pseudo-science of chance creation was proposed.  In this case resistance was half-hearted and incompetent; instead of using science and reason to expose the false science, church leaders relied on bombast and dogma.
But people remembered how church dogma had previously to give way to science.  So the foolish pride of the worldly church was again found wanting with further loss of support to Christianity.
The Gospel story of Peter (at the time of trial) is well reflected in the life of the Christian church; the worldly Church had now denied Jesus (=truth) twice.
So we can see why a statement of fact, neither understood at the time, nor wanted, had to be expressed in mystical terms.  I am the way; I am the truth and I am life; no one comes to the Father except by me was valued because people did not have to know, or desire to find, its underlying meaning, it was enough that it sound like, and could be interpreted to mean, something wonderfully esoteric and exciting.
I am the way... is, of course, supported by comments such as, you must leave self behind or you must be born again.  This combination is extremely important; so important that the instruction is repeated in different forms.  This instruction has also, for the same reasons (mankind's pride and sloth) been misunderstood.  While the comments are memorable people always look for easy answers.  The way mankind prefers to think is egocentric, so his natural choice is of the wish fulfilling kind: he chose to see rebirth as a magical flash of inspiration or instant conversion to full salvation.  
Is that Christian-rational?
Did Jesus promise a miraculous solution to life's challenge? To recognize truth is a tremendous step, but it does not end there!  We have to follow up on our great discovery - we have to get to know truth!
Is it not true that the great difficulty most people have with new concepts is that they don't like to expose their ego or give up existing fixations?  People defend their beliefs as if sacred; but it is truth that is sacred, not our beliefs.
Today human weakness is very obvious to the discerning and observant.  All around us, be it politics, religion, medical treatments or whatever, dogmatic attitudes persist and resist enlightenment.  Greens fight with loggers; Protestants fight Catholics; communists fight capitalists; fundamentalist Christians fight fundamentalist evolutionists ... and, whatever the fighting is about, both sides have uncompromising and narrow fixations.  Each group is bound up in egocentric certainties.  
If people were willing to entertain doubts - willing to accept a continuing process of rebirth - then they would learn the benefits of "listening rather than shouting" and go on to peaceful agreements, because both sides, in dogmatic dispute, are largely wrong.
The gaining of understanding and true wisdom is a continual process of rebirth - total truth is not achieved in a single step - progress to truth is a continuing rebirth.
But we see from the attitudes and teachings of Christian churches today that Jesus is still not acclaimed for His advanced understanding and teaching of life-science.  
The Church strongly resists that ethics are a natural product of the order of our creation rather than some arrogant personal demand of an all-powerful Creator who leaves little to human will and self-discipline.  In its pandering to our earthly ego in order to gain earthly support, the worldly Church reveals the earthly preferences of its staff - and so, in this attitude, the Church denies Jesus (=truth) for the third time.
The worldly church prefers to teach miracles rather than self responsibility because that is the way the world wants it.  More today than at any time since the resurrection, Christian teaching is based on stories of promise rather than on scientific instruction for rewarding living.  The importance of the things that He is remembered to have said are still not acknowledged or explained.  His statements are now interpreted so as to glamorise an emotional story line.
Today Christianity is taught as though no more than a free-loader's paradise while the consequences of anti-social behaviour are glossed over.  And this despite that Jesus Himself said, "I  bring not peace but a sword".  He offered the sword of truth.  We are at war!  We "turn the other cheek" not to appease evil but to sedate dissent in our own camp.
The war of life is not for the purpose of giving aid to life's destructive forces.  We need to face that He brought a sword, not a tin of trader's beads.
Nothing in the above is to suggest that the resurrection and virgin birth are unimportant but to remind people that such happenings are only important if there is evidence of the person involved being a superior being.
Without evidence of other-worldly understanding for support, stories of miracles, no matter how intriguingly presented, are of no more importance than the earthly wisdom hidden behind any Grimm's fairy tale.

LIFE GUIDANCE
What is this wisdom of Jesus actually telling us?  It is the essential kind of instruction you might get in any good instruction book with any complicated piece of equipment: if you want good service from this equipment, accept its designed nature and purpose and obey the operating and maintenance instructions; i.e. make an effort to use it correctly.
It is the structure of the instrument that decides its purpose and its value is in the skill of its use; the success of its use depends on keeping to manufacturer's instructions as these are based on a true knowledge of its structure, design and purpose.
Many today will easily accept that true knowledge is essential to beneficial decision-making, for this reason true science prospers.  But people, when it comes to social order, are still governed by beliefs and attitudes that are based on a religious faith in the human desires and ideologies of arrogance and greed - ideologies and desires that ignore the relationships of life's structure.
How, in such circumstances, can we be puzzled that science is misused and culture disintegrating?
Would we not think mad a person who tried to use a car as a lawn-mower, or a stove as a refrigerator?  Yet we persist to ignore our own true nature and our Maker's guidance.
Is it not rationally inarguable that the way to a more complete, advanced and rewarding life is through finding and accepting the truth of life's nature and creation?  In common terms: by worship of truth.
What is truth?  Truth is the reality of the order in which we exist, just as also it is with a stove or refrigerator.  Were that to be understood and practised in day-to-day living, benefits beyond present human understanding would accumulate.
Yes, "I am the way ..." is just a simple common-sense statement but people, at that time or since, have not been prepared to make the sacrifice of a continuing rebirth that is needed for an advancing understanding of the practical worldly purpose of the Master's visit.
Because of the insight shown by Jesus I have, from the time I read the Gospels, acknowledged this Master and found no other teacher to rival Him.

OUR PROBLEMS BEGIN WITH OURSELVES
Some may think that in this prologue I am "making mountains out of molehills".  We have been conditioned to imagine that all important issues are major issues - that the great crimes of our century have been committed by the Stalins, Hitlers and Pol Pots of the world.  Perhaps we should see such people as nature's predators preying on the slothful-unthinking, foolish-prideful, covetous-blinded and lust-crippled.
Why do predators, doing their natural job in the natural world of our present humanist attitudes, not suit our humanist society?
Is it pride that insists we pretend to be caring or do we cater to a suppressed conscience?
The great crimes of the world are the consequence of an accumulation of little crimes by little people; but we don't want to admit to that, do we?
Little crimes are the base of all crime, but we hate the thought of social responsibility and self-discipline.  
We will gladly go to extremes of self-discipline in the interests of sporting glory, or beauty and health, or even business success, but when it comes to human social welfare the "seven deadly sins" are virtually unknown and very unwelcome.  We don't want to know that, as we glory in our selfish instincts, we create pain for others; or that our own pain is the natural consequence of others giving preference to their selfish instincts.  We are even so self-deceptive as to call some of our worst transgressions 'victimless crimes'.
So let's list the seven common crimes so that we may have less excuse for not knowing how to create a better, more just, more rewarding and less crime-ridden, world.  
The seven are:
Pride: are we too proud to admit our faults?
Covetousness: does greed overcome our scruples? 
Lust: does animal desire blind us to responsibility?
Anger: does self-righteousness dominate?
Envy: are we consumed by jealousy? 
Sloth: are we too lazy to think, or look for answers?
Gluttony: have we a consuming passion?

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO HUMAN SOCIETY?
It seems to many today that neither science nor religion has answers to life's most important questions.  Either that or, if they do have answers, then the answers are not being made available to the general public.  
Or is it that the general public (because of the mental confusion created by conflicting 'experts') is no longer able to distinguish between intelligent answers and ignorant answers?
But then, if the latter is the case, would that not seem to indicate some inhuman philosophy taking over the sinews of human communication to deliberately confuse and mislead?  After all, a rational, truly caring society should be able to communicate factual social information to itself without confusion.
There are many signs of serious social damage and it is not unreasonable to suppose that the information being ignored by our leading institutions contains the medicine we need.  
The immoral lack of regard for human welfare, that is cloaked by a pretence of extreme caring, may be the result of ego trying to defend political ideology, or profits, pride of position, or the easy satisfaction of personal lust.  It may also be the result of a deliberate deception in the interests of greed and accumulating power, or then again (perhaps most likely) it is all of those.
If deliberate deception is involved then this deception is on an international scale and can only have as its design and purpose the enslavement of the world's people to the plans and designs of a socially criminal elitist world government.
Whether social subversion is a deliberate use of human weakness, or accidental, is an important question.  But also important is the fact that, in either circumstance, the logical consequence would result in the death and misery of millions, probably the eventual genocide of entire nations.

CREATION BELIEF IS IMPORTANT
We humans, because of our ability for intelligent behaviour, direct our social and moral concepts so as to bring them into logical accord with our most basic belief - our creation belief.  For this reason it is truly vital that we direct our efforts to improving our understanding of the reality in which we exist. 
Throughout the ages every tribe has attached itself to a 'god' and this is because every social structure needs an anchor for its behaviour.
It shall be shown that the theory of creation by an evolution directed by chance and natural selection is in contradiction of both science and logic.  It is a false god. 
At first we may not want to see that our problems largely result from our own ego-driven desires and hopes of acclaim, or that these desires may cause us to risk everything and to create deceptions such as the "Piltdown Man" hoax.  
Perhaps we may prefer to see our problems as just honest examples of confused reasoning that gained credence because of deep-seated emotional desires in mankind.  In the end however, it has to be recognized that this error could not have accumulated had it not been both deliberately serving the plans of the world's most powerful people and aided by a natural desire of mankind to avoid responsibility.  
Covetousness and sloth have combined to aid deceit and produce incredible human harm.  To continue this selfishness will result in the death of yet another civilization - ours. 
So we have a serious accusation and a serious situation in urgent need of attention.  But to justify such a challenge do I need do more than remind readers that intelligence is a logical ability and that the benefits to be gained from intelligence depend entirely on the accuracy of the information on which intelligent decisions are made?
Success in life depends on the accuracy of our understanding of life.  If life is a meaningless chance event, then we can only achieve pleasure in our preferred form.  Any suffering we may cause others is irrelevant because life itself is irrelevant.  
On the other hand, if this life is part of an ongoing process, perhaps a test, perhaps an education, then only a fool would throw away the chance of enlightenment and adventure.

HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Though it is obvious that we humans often behave emotionally and not always intelligently (in fact we may often seem to behave stupidly and not in logical accord with what we claim are our beliefs) nevertheless, intelligence exerts a constant pressure toward rational behaviour and there are, in fact, logical reasons for apparent deviations from the path of logic.
Human behaviour is heavily influenced by our environment; by a confusion of misinformation; by emotional desires and social pressures; we are normally more misinformed than informed - more conditioned to accept social conventions than truths.  We also tend to forget that handed down morals (if of long history) are the logical outcome of long experience.  Historic experience is not irrelevant to our welfare in today's world.
We have to face such factors in our behaviour as laziness or sloth.  Even where we accept the surface logic of a new idea we seldom take even a little trouble to work out the implications.  We prefer to leave that to 'authorities'; it is easier to see it as 'their' responsibility.  But why should they, more than we, be dedicated to work in our service in preference to their own?  If we do not think our life is worth our own effort on our own behalf, how can we expect others to make an effort for us? 
D.A.. Norris, in his book Before You Lose It All says:  Looking at liberty we find the simplest version in society is that men should have no restraints at all.  But this, of course, leads to anarchy and in effect destroys liberty.
In other words: to seek freedom as an absolute is to promote anarchy.  The natural result of this is to deliver ultimate power into the hands of a dictatorial elite.
U.S.A. President Jefferson: If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects what never was and never will be.
A person conditioned by upbringing and social environment to a certain set of morals (if not otherwise predisposed) is likely to retain much of his behaviour pattern and defend it, even after agreeing to evidence that would logically make the old standard irrelevant.
In short, while we are generally logical in the use of information (and over generations work to bring behaviour into line with accepted belief) our immediate behaviour is quite often deformed by emotion and confusion.
If a creation belief is fixed into a community by education and social pressure, social change will work through to its natural logical conclusion (so far as the reality in which we exist will allow).  It follows that, if false beliefs are not to result in huge suffering, corrections to such beliefs must take place while their consequences can still be understood and compared to alternatives.
It is up to us to be aware of our nature and to see that our sloth, pride, selfishness and prejudices do not lead us to accept misleading ideas even if excitingly presented and emotionally pleasing - this, especially, if the beliefs are detrimental to the future of life on earth.
No doubt we would not be so easily led (or misled), by desires and the comfort of conformity, if early education impressed on us that wrong ideas (no matter how emotionally pleasing) must, by logic, lead eventually to distress, conflict and a wilful waste of life's opportunities; that the ultimate communal reward for simple selfishness - is suffering.

SOMETHING IS WRONG
In an age when we who live in the advanced nations have such technical advantages for the improvement of life it should be apparent that something is basically wrong when corruption, violence, drug-taking, inhuman behaviour, confusion and social disintegration have become the measure of social progress.  
When the number of socially disadvantaged grows rather than declines in a technically progressive society there is something seriously wrong and we should seek the fault in our most basic beliefs.  We must look carefully at institutionalised and indoctrinated belief to see where the error lies.
Were present beliefs based on the truth of life then of course we should accept them.  No true intelligence would ever want to ignore reality.  If materialist teachings are false, as I think can be reasonably proven, all who want to achieve the best result from their living should be grateful to see that to persist with materialist belief is to commit suicide.

THE PROGRAM
What I hope to show in this writing, at least sufficiently to alert a community of interest, is that chance creation is a deliberately false concept and that it is the effect of materialist attitudes based on this concept that are the cause of the great human distress and social injustices of today.
How can we approach this question?  What we must look at is the driving force behind our social behaviour.
So let us now go to the debate and examine the evidence behind these opening comments in more detail. 

Following exposure of the Satanist theology we go on to find just how delightfully simple the Christian Revelation turns out to be and how simply delightful is its understanding.
THE HUMAN CHOICE

Jesus
Vs.
Satan


Part 1.
SATANIST THEOLOGY  

Introduction 
Today the religion promoted by Satanists is the materialist theory of creation by chance and natural selection.  In earlier times this was expressed in various forms of nature or idol worship; today we see it returning to its primitive expression as nature worship.  This does not mean that Satan is ignorant of the spiritual nature of life - in fact, among insiders, spirit is in religious awareness - but the plan to control the world has to be a plan based on deceit.
Spiritual religion, and the humanist materialist religion, engage in a life/death struggle; both cannot survive, one will become dominant and the other will terminate.  The success of one will lead us to the limits (if any exist) of human development; success for the other will mean a civilization based on a false concept of life and proceed to total enslavement.  The purpose of this study is to expose the credentials of both sides so that intelligent choice can be made.
The question is: what is the main driving force controlling society?  Fortunately the answer is a matter of simple logic: the principal driving force of social behaviour is our belief in how we came to exist.

HOW WERE WE CREATED?
The most important question in mankind's universe is, "How were we created?"  
The importance of this is that humans have a capacity for intelligence.  The way we behave - our social moral - is directed (so much as it is in our power) by our perception of our origins.  Creation belief is the ultimate directive of social behaviour and the shaping of human social development.
Is information now being kept from the public in order to serve the development of a certain social ideology designed to shape and enslave human society?  
If social engineering is taking place, then creation belief is the "absolutely essential" tool of manipulation.  
A takeover of human culture (if the manipulators are to have any chance of success) requires the installation of a creation concept that will support the deceiver's plan.  
When we understand this we understand the purpose of the deceit that has been introduced, also the importance of the need that this deceit be exposed.
There are obvious problems when it comes to exposing indoctrinated social fantasy because not only will the glory of the world's most powerful families be at stake but there will also be widespread opposition from the enslaved public.  
It may, at first, seem incredible that the enslaved will hesitate to throw off their yokes, but once reality has been hidden then reality itself becomes part of the frightening unknown.  When a belief has been accepted and has become the rationale for behaviour it becomes a religion.  Creation belief is the base for our attitude to life and, once accepted, must be defended.  Rebirth is a difficult challenge.
Looking closely at the problem we see that there are only two significant and opposed concepts of creation on which all present social deviations are based.  
One is that man has an intelligent and spiritual nature attached to a physical nature; the other denies the existence of spirit or any non-physical intelligent force in either nature or creation.  
Obviously there is a lot of ignorant intermixing or confusion between the two opposed creation beliefs and academics are not immune to this confusion, but the question comes down to "creation by chance or creation by intelligence - a world of spiritual design or a world of chance forces?"  
All who want to be rational and able to make decisions in their own best interests, have to eliminate beliefs that are mutually exclusive and opposed to each other.
So long as people are massively indoctrinated to believe in creation by chance evolution - so long as people are told that this is the only intelligent belief - society must, if materialist belief is in error, work toward its own self-destruction.  That is the logical result of following a creation belief not true to our nature.
All error and confused reasoning deserve exposure but, in the case of a theory of creation, that need is vital.

THE DEBATE
When people debate "intelligent creation as against chance creation" the end may be that the exponent of the chance side will say, "Well, if God created the universe then who created God?"
If the advocate for intelligent creation is inexperienced he might find this a difficult position but, if knowledgeable, he will say, "I don't know if there is an answer to that, I would think that God has always been there."
His opponent may then say, "That is not a legitimate argument" but, before he can claim victory, the defender of intelligent creation should say, "Well, you claim everything was created by the chance manipulation of matter.  Please, before you claim to win, tell me by what chance was the matter created from nothing?"
The debate, at this point must end in a stalemate as both are forced to claim that their creator has 'always been there' and must accept that they offer no understandable beginning.
But this question is too important to be allowed to rest in limbo - it is illogical and unnecessary to let it rest there and we fall into a neat trap if we allow it to rest there.  
So let's put origins aside; the debate, as we shall see, does not conclude equally with the unanswerable question of origins.  The debate must be decided on the credibility, or otherwise, of "chance Vs. intelligence" as a creative force in the known world.
Let us apply ourselves to that. 
Creation belief is a religion regardless of its favour of chance or design.  Chance or design are the only positive choices but to choose negatively is also a religious choice; in most cases a mere cop-out to sloth.
Most of us make no honest study of what we believe!  We are content to select bits and pieces of the two opposites or simply choose some human authority to support our emotional desire and relieve us of the responsibility of thinking for ourselves.  Both ploys, of course, are only mild variations on the earlier-mentioned cop-out.  Each cop-out puts us in a moral limbo where all effort in aid of our human development is futile.  This is not a healthy position and Jesus warns of it when He says: 
He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters. M't. 12:30.  
There is no middle ground in the battle between good and evil.
It is vital we eliminate confused and conflicting beliefs.
Intelligent commitment is more than mere self-interest, it is a commitment to responsibility and creative adventure.
Those who know something of the frailty of evolution theory may wonder why this materialistic religion has been so successful in replacing the religion that has had such influence during the rapid advances of the last thousand years.
Although materialists frequently claim Christian religions to be just emotional props to allow people to avoid responsibility, that is a deception.  
What is true is that seductive teaching of chance creation has created a competition between earthy passions and led Christian religion to degenerate to the point that it is little more than a vehicle for humanism and a prop for the disadvantaged.  To imply that it is in the nature of intelligent creation that it be a prop, is rather like saying that a shovel is a prop because some lean-on rather than use it.  
Honest assessment of both spiritual and materialist religion makes clear that it is the religion of intelligent creation that demands responsible behaviour while it is the religion of chance creation that offers (in fact demands) escapism - it is materialism that offers rewards for evasion of responsibility.  Deceivers try to mask their weaknesses as the failures of others.  The evidence supplies the answers.  
The rapid rise in popularity of the religion of chance has no  driving motivation other than ideas which encourage the mankind-desired escape from responsibility.  Admittedly this desire to escape responsibility was aided by deformities entering into Christian religion over the years. 
Logically, if creation is just a freak working out of chance events then there is no purpose to life.  Future is irrelevant.  Life is for the strong.  Death will claim all equally.  The killer, predator or criminal is equal to the victim and cruelty is equal to kindness.  There can be no lasting reward or regret, after life all will be no more than had it never been.
Those remarks are confirmed by the humanist teaching and philosophy that has now infiltrated both the law and education of our world.  Humanist "politically correct" teaching promotes egocentricity behind a thin disguise of 'caring'.  In law the criminal becomes the victim of society.  Socially, pleasure is our only goal; morals are situational and all authority - from parent or God - must be rejected (meaning all authority, excepting humanism's own authoritarian claims).  Our greatest triumph is to win an argument in favour of our ego.
A superficial mask of caring is the self-deception needed as a sop to a conscience that cannot be easily terminated.  Naturally deception is O.K. if life is meaningless; or, in a humanist world, if personal gain is the motive for misinformation.
Humanist ideology gives the State power for population control.  To eliminate unwanted population will advantage a shrinking (thus increasingly advantaged) majority.  But the final winners are the control group who, by this sly gradualism, tempt the present majority to gradual self-destruction.
Where do they get the authority for such ideology?  That, as you might expect, is unstated, but can be easily traced to a rational response to belief in "survival of the fittest".  There is no authority, therefore I need no authority.  A deceiver's tautology.  The ultimate beneficiary is the Satanist plan.
This, logically and demonstrably, is the secret purpose of the mass-produced, demonic, humanist philosophy that is now commonly known as "political ideology".
Humanist teachings have infiltrated the education system so quietly and secretly that most parents are still ignorant as to why their children so quickly disrespect parental advice and turn to drugs and immoral behaviour.  The mass media suffer an odd blindness where exposure of social-engineering is concerned.
Advocates of materialism try to justify a sophistic concept of morality and caring but the logical force in man knows that altruism has no meaning in a chance creation.  
We have an innate moral need to believe we are caring but self-interest pulls us to adopt values that are real in terms of our creation belief.
If materialist religion was based on firm evidence and logic then there could be no cause for complaint.  To escape into the fantasy land of drugs and die before maturity is just as sensible as anything else - human future is meaningless.  But if the theory of chance evolution does not stand up to critical inspection, then to accept it just to satisfy selfish lusts, egocentricity and slothful living is a human catastrophe. 
Evolution theory has long been hard to justify and is now a jumble of patch-ups and evasions.  A hundred years ago it might have seemed to have scientific potential but, despite claims, growing scientific knowledge gave it no support.  Belief in chance creation is, as shall be shown, an indoctrinated myth.
Because argument opposing evolution is not well publicised, I make no claim of originality for arguments or evidence I present.  What I do claim is that the truth about evolution is being hidden from the public and from those students who accept the confines of formal education.
The reason for this deceit is social engineering.  
History shows that beliefs, once institutionalised, are difficult to oppose and may be fanatically maintained even after shown to be ridiculous.
Let us look at the evidence.
THE HUMAN CHOICE



SATANIST THEOLOGY

THE MYTHS OF CHANCE EVOLUTION.
The importance of evolution theory to modern man is that it is a theory of creation - at the base of all motivation for human behaviour is creation belief.  Creation belief represents man's link with his origins; it is the origin of his conviction of what he really is; his true nature; how he came to be.  It is the foundation of his reasoning about the nature of life and man's purpose (or lack of purpose) in it.
Creation belief, in whatever form, is our religion.  To change our creation belief we have, intellectually, to accept rebirth into a different world with a different value system.  But though the pains of enlightenment may be great the rewards of turning from mythology to truth are far greater.
In this item of review we see how mankind has progressed in its efforts at misleading mankind; something made possible because mankind likes to think as desire tempts rather than as God (in His knowledge of the creation plan) thinks.
I do not want to go into the history of evolution theory or the conflict surrounding it before it became institutionalised and emotional barriers were raised against all who might fault its claims.  Sufficient to point out that the theory was born and accepted at a time when the relevant sciences were mere hatchlings.
The theory of chance evolution is now taught in the world's most powerful countries in a manner which suggests it is beyond challenge.  It claims to explain the creation of life as both spontaneous generation and gradual evolution from simple beginnings.  It is taught as being more than just a scientific theory; it is taught as being the only intellectually acceptable theory.
That the theory is presented in this way is important to note because it puts students on the defensive; to question a theory that authority presents as beyond question would mark a young student as brash.  However the adoption of such an authoritarian attitude leaves the suggestion that its advocates fear intelligent debate.
The heart of evolution theory - its fundamental principle of operation - is "survival of the fittest".  The complementary mechanism that allows survival of the fittest to act is "random mutation".  The first mechanism says that the fittest will survive and implies, as a matter of necessity, that the survivors will, by nature, be more genetically complex, more advanced, and better future survivors than their ancestors.  
Random mutation is claimed to provide new potential from which selection of the fittest can take place.
Now, because of the general confusion and misuse of words and facts used in the presentation of this theory, it is necessary to discuss the meaning of the word 'evolution'.
The simplest meaning of the word evolution is "a natural or logical progression of events".  From there it has been a sly step to suggest that biological change is creative evolution.
Example: if I sugar my tea and find it not sweet enough, I add a little more.  This obviously is a logical progression or unfolding of events.  A more meaningful example would appear if all children in a large group were each given a bag of marbles to play with.  Over a period of time some of these marbles would become lost, some would become chipped or broken, some may even be thrown away in anger.  The result would be a natural and progressive lessening of the number of marbles remaining with the group.  This too is a legitimate meaning of the word evolution, although, you may note, that the progress described is degenerating rather than expanding. 
If the children played marbles "for keeps" there would be a constant interchange of marbles between the children.  They would not only gain possession of different marbles but some would gain and some would lose.  This is also evolutionary progress and not unlike the changes that take place between generations within living genetic systems.
Now let us assume that red marbles become of highest value and green of lowest value.  The players will concentrate more on winning red marbles and so these will gravitate to the best players, others will lose all their red marbles.  Suppose the elite (the good players) now decide to change the environment and declare that those who have no red marbles cannot play.  This eliminates some players and the games go on.  Later the master enters the schoolyard and decides to rectify the earlier injustice (change the environment again); he declares those who have no green marbles to be barred from the games.  
Some of the best players, who have eliminated their lowly valued green marbles, are now out of the game.  These examples represent the effects of genetic 'specialisation' in living things and are like the absolutely logical and proven natural progress (and eventual consequence of genetic change) in the changing environment of life.
Let us now see the marbles as representing 'genes' in a large community and we now see how great numbers of changes can take place and how (over generations) specialisation can occur in a suitable environmental situation - we also see how specialisation may lead to elimination in a later environmental change.
The reason I give this simple example is to show that the word 'evolution' can be quite legitimately used to describe the genetic changes that are constantly taking place in living systems but which have nothing whatever to do with the actual creation, or new development, of living things.
No new marbles are given the children after the first handout and likewise, there is no reason or evidence to suppose new genes are a significant addition to living populations even though such populations have considerable potential for variation.  In fact our potential for variation is such that no two humans are found to be identical other, perhaps, than twins born from a single fertilized egg.  
It is therefore quite legitimate to talk of evolution in these terms and such examples and discussion would be quite acceptable if the discussion were about evolutionary change alone.  BUT when evolutionists talk, write and teach about evolution, they are NOT talking about simple change and rearrangement, they are talking about a system for the CREATION of life. 
Be warned, if you read life education stories today you will be given examples of change or rearrangement and be enticed to believe that these are examples of creative change; they are not, such examples of creation by chance evolution are, as we shall see, evolutionist propaganda.
Evolution theorists have misled people for years by the simple device of claiming that any genetic mutation will provide an opportunity for natural selection and that this will lead to creative development.  What they do not expose is that the random genetic damage is actual and destructive damage, and while this does allow opportunity for natural selection, the benefits of that selection relates only to maintaining the existing life-form.  The long-term result is to simplify genetic structure; there is no new genetic creation.  The process works in direct opposition to the creation of life.
Although evolutionists point to all visible signs of past change as being evidence for (or actual demonstrations and proofs of) creative evolution, beware...
NOTE:  Nobel Prize winner H.J. Muller dismissed survival of the fittest as a mechanism for creation in 1949, and C.H. Waddington (a geneticist) in 1959 correctly claimed natural selection, in the context of creation, as tautology; i.e. a pointless use of words.
Unfortunately, statements by eminent people such as these (even when related to questions important to human survival) are inadequate for public enlightenment if denied the publicity they deserve.  
The person used to abstract reasoning can, once having had a point called to attention, look at the matter and work it out to a rational conclusion.  Unfortunately, few people are used to abstract reasoning and tend to accept all statements as ONLY opinions.  Education and mass media both now work against the development of abstract reasoning ability.
As vital genetic insights have not been explained in terms suitable to general understanding, let us consider another example to clarify the genetic picture.  

A PARABLE OF A SINKING ISLAND
Let us suppose that there was once a large island with vegetation, birds and various life forms.  At some ancient time one of Earth's many natural disasters, in the form of a large earthquake, sinks the greater part of the island into the sea.  All that remains visible is the top of a previously high plateau.
The birds were accustomed to living and nesting in the large trees and living on insects that they caught while flying among the branches.  But those large trees are not adapted to grow at low levels in salt laden air and over the years they die back, become stunted and eventually disappear.  They leave an island densely covered with small shrubs and bushes.  The birds have been forced to live closer and closer to the ground until they have become ground dwellers, but are able to survive because there are no bird-eating predators.
Now what happens under the influence of genetic mutation and survival of the fittest?  The birds have one major attribute that is no longer an advantage - the ability to fly.  They also have another feature that is now of increased importance to their survival - their legs.  It would be an advantage if their legs were stronger to enable them to run or hop more quickly through the undergrowth and so catch more insects.
All genes are afflicted by random damage!  If, while the birds were living in the treetops there occurred damage to a flight gene, then the bird so damaged would be at a disadvantage - it would be less competitive.
The damaged bird and its gene would be self-eliminating and the flying ability of the colony maintained.  But now that the birds are living in dense undergrowth it is flight ability that is a disadvantage; because of the dense undergrowth the wings cause obstruction whenever inadvertently spread as the birds attempt to catch their prey.  In this situation every random destruction of a flight gene gives its bearer an advantage; therefore the ability to fly is eliminated.
That also gives rise to an additional bonus: the breeding out of unwanted features will allow more life-energy to flow to wanted features; the strength of the legs in relation to the body will improve because of reduced internal competition, genetic selection and increased exercise.  
You will observe that destruction of flight ability in the above situation will occur "naturally and inevitably" but the strengthening of the legs is limited to the genetic alternatives already inherent in the bird.  Mathematically speaking, if all the world's birds had been placed in this situation for all the time that birds have been living on earth, the potential for any one family to have acquired, by chance mutation, new genes to convert it, say, from a hopping bird to a running bird, would be so small as to be irrelevant to successful change.  There is no evidence of any such creative change ever having occurred.
But ages pass, and at some time a ship is wrecked on the island; the survivors are a family of cats. The cats are easily able to catch and eat the flightless birds.  The island being well populated by birds, the cats multiply rapidly.
Result: the bird population comes to an abrupt ending.  But the cats, too, having long domestication, have lost much of their genetic ability to survive in the wild.  Without shelter, and no easy supply of food, they also die out.
The above is the uncomplicated story of nature that agrees with the known facts and established evidence.  Biology accepts the fact of specialisation (genetic degeneration); it is too obvious to deny.  Yet specialisation is in complete opposition to creative evolution.
What is to be learned from that little story?
(a) That genetic specialisation will occur naturally, logically and inevitably, whenever a life-form finds itself in an environmental niche where some of its genetic load is of no advantage, more quickly if it is a disadvantage.  The evidence is beyond dispute.
(b) Survival of the fittest is not a creative force, it is a maintenance force, it ensures the continuing health of the species in a particular situation.  Even though, in principle, survival of the fittest may be even-handed, it is not creative or even-handed in long-term effect. 
Because the destruction of genes occurs naturally and re- placement is to all practical purposes impossible, the long-term trend is to degeneration.  The trees could not adapt.
This is the point that Muller and Waddington made: there is no law of nature that sets an over-riding standard of fitness.  What is fittest in one environment will be unfitted to another, and the more ideally a life-form adapts to any specific environment the less will be its chances of survival if the environment critically changes.  Had the birds of our little example not spent enough time in a ground-living environment to suffer critical loss of their flight genes, both the birds and cats may have survived in limited numbers.
The loss of a gene is, for practical purposes, a permanent loss.  Here we see expressed in biology the form of a law of physics - the second law of thermodynamics.  It is in the nature of systems, if left to chance, to degenerate.
NOTE:  The preservation of the gene pool is now a major problem for science.  There is a desperate rush to establish gene banks for plants, to do this for animals is more difficult.  
In the process of breeding new plants and animals we are not actually creating new genetic ability; what we do is isolate the features we want and then "breed out" unwanted competitive genes.    This, more slowly, is what nature does.
The promotion of creative evolution (if not a deliberate deceit) is, at least, a manipulation and evasion of the evidence.

SPLIT GENES AND RNA SPLICING.
Advancing insight into the structure and operation of genetics is cause for something of a stir among biologists.  It has been found that genetic material is often found to be in pieces spread along chains of DNA in an apparently erratic way.  This discovery has yet to be explained by those who believe in chance creation but it presents no problem to those who accept the evidence that life forms appeared on earth as whole, very complex and complete units.  In this understanding a limited number of life-forms each carry the entire genetic program for its kind.  That is: each genus specialises out from its own original, complex gene pool.
Assuming that the entire RNA load for related families was originally arranged on a DNA chain, it is reasonable that gaps appear as individuals specialise in diverse environments and forms.  In the process the genetic load would be divided between family groups.  The sections lost to one group or another would then appear as gaps on the DNA chain and be maintained as non-constructive links in the interests of maintaining the order of genetic material.  This is just as would be expected in a system of intelligent creation.
It is interesting to note that one of the acclaimed writers on this subject, Francis Crick, in his article in "Science, Vol. 204, April 1979" says, quote:
Should a chromosomal gene arise whose transcript was processed to make more than one protein, I would expect that in the course of evolution the gene would be duplicated, one copy subsequently specialising on one of the proteins and the other copy on the other.  If this point of view is correct, then one would expect multiple-choice genes to occur only rarely in the chromosomes of eukaryotes.
Crick, of course, to maintain his academic position, must bow to the evolution assumption; however, it is the evidence, not the facade, that we are interested in.  What he is saying is that if we had a gene which contained information to express two alternatives then in time one could be expected to express itself in one branch of the family and the other in another, we would not expect them to remain as multiple-choice genes.  Therefore, we would expect multiple-choice genes to be rare in the chromosomes of higher animals.
This gives further expert (if perhaps unintended) support for an intelligent creation where the original life-form is complete and genetically complex.  
It is evident that when life-forms first appear on earth they are genetically very complex.  This allows them the potential to adapt, diversify and specialise to related families and is as an intelligent creator would work; it is not a possibility for chance creation.
Under the constant pressure of random genetic damage, environmental changes and selection of the fittest, the Crick finding supports (without conflict) the concept of intelligent creation and the fossil record as it is now shown to exist.
An important feature of this improved understanding is that it allows scope for prediction.  If, in fact, the DNA chain is maintained while the attached genetic instruction disperses, then we can expect that forms of life that have widely diversified and specialised will show many gaps on the genetic string, while those with minimal change will show few gaps.  Unfortunately, if the deceit is deliberate, the mass media is unlikely to publicise and explain such findings nor will funds be directed to such projects. 
A further crack in convention?  We also note that Francis Crick (who is the Nobel Laureate co-discoverer of the DNA structure) had an article called "Seeding the Universe" in OMEGA, March/April, 1982.  In this article he discusses the possibility that life may have come to earth from elsewhere in the universe and proposes means whereby we may seed other planets.  
It seems unlikely that a famous authority would chance academic back-lash to bring this idea forward unless personally doubtful that life had begun naturally on earth. 
Now a piece of evidence of genetic simplification occurring over the kind of time span during which evolution theory would demand an increase in complexity.  In a book called "Creation still goes on" by F.L. Boschke, (attempting to support the evolution theory of course) we are told of the discovery that Bacillus circulans, a tiny form of life that has been resilient enough to survive 300 MILLION years of suspended animation in rock salts, has been found (after that period of time) to be more genetically complex than its present-day natural descendants.
Although it may not be TOTALLY impossible for a chance rearrangement of genetic material to create a new and useful gene once a complex genetic structure has become available, we don't know that it has ever happened.  What we do know is that it couldn't happen often enough to account for any useful biological  progress and can, in no way, account for the creation of life in the first place.

A SECOND DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION THEORY
Evolutionists maintain that life originated in a primitive organic 'soup' by spontaneous generation.  But widely known and acclaimed astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle and associate, Professor C. Wickramasinghe, in their 1981 book "Evolution from Space" say:  ...there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial is... an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.
They go on to say of evolution theory: If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction ... this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court.  End quote.
As astronomers these men are expert in mathematics. 
So the second disproof of chance creation is that it is a mathematical impossibility.  More on this later.

A THIRD DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION THEORY
A third impassible barrier to chance creation is the fossil record.  Despite years of extreme, might we say "frantic", effort to find "missing links", none have ever come to light. 
For example: the fossil evidence has long been distressing to evolution theory because it does not show the gradual change of life forms that evolution requires.  What it shows is that a series of complex life-forms have appeared as the earth has progressed from supplying the bare necessities of life to an ability to support life at the present level.  As the environment for the support of life has changed, new life-forms have suddenly appeared.  Many earlier life forms became specialised and then became extinct.  
Life-forms change within their kind, none can be realistically shown to have changed gradually into new kinds of life-forms.
Evolutionists claim that the fossil record is incomplete and imply that it is just a matter of time.  In fact, all strata since the earliest time of life have been searched and the evidence is conclusive that there are none of the evolutionary missing links that chance evolution requires.  
This is not to say that everything is known of the fossil record, but definitely, that enough is known to eliminate gradual evolution as a scientific theory.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF IT?
The struggle to play God and manipulate human life has caused incredible misery and millions of deaths, but no one bothers to ask if the creation belief on which this social engineering is based is valid or 'scientific' in any sense that those terms might be reasonably used.  If anyone has brought the matter up then they have been carefully kept from explaining or exposing the situation in ways meaningful to the public. 
Human manipulation is the only logical reason for teaching the evolution myth.  The criminal purpose of these deadly social- engineering plans is the most obvious motive for this deceit. 

FURTHER EVIDENCE OF DELIBERATELY IMPOSED MYTH
Now a short review of additional evidence disproving chance creation and demonstrating the deliberate nature of the deception.
Why does the peacock have such a large and colourful tail?
Answer: To attract his mate.  Nature has evolved a wonderful courtship ritual for that purpose.
You will find (or have already found) that evolutionists have what they call 'a plausible explanation' for everything.  Obviously an explanation of sorts can be devised to explain everything imaginable, but do these explanations have any relevance to fact?  What if we ask why the sparrow does not need a large and colourful tail to attract a mate?
The explanations evolutionists give do nothing to explain why nature, in her blind unconcern for all things, should evolve birds of fancy colours when brown or black would seem to serve equally well.  Or, for that matter, why would nature evolve birds at all?
Because they are necessary for this or that purpose, the evolutionists reply.  But if nature is spiritually dead then nature does not care about this or that purpose, nature knows nothing and cares nothing.  
Physical nature is physical!  Physical nature, without life, is a bare rock, and only after the complicated arrangement of biological life is complete do any or all of the oddities of life serve some purpose.  Physical nature has no concern with reason.  Physical nature neither knows nor cares; physical nature is blind, deaf and dumb.
The trouble with evolutionists is that they look at a complete system and seek to explain the finished product in terms to suit their religious (or employer's) need. If we begin at the beginning we find their plausible explanations are meaningless drivel explaining nothing.  Does the earth want birds and bees?  Does the water want fish?  No!
Because no establishment will accept correction easily, please bear with me while I bury the dead; while I add more examples to confirm, or make even more obvious, what we have already found. 

BUT IT ALL HAPPENED BY CHANCE, 
SAY THE EVOLUTIONISTS.
Chance creation, in physics, is a mathematically verifiable proposition.  Any logical or scientific theory that depends on chance can be tested.
In a sound materialist logic any theory would begin with its mathematical status.  This would be especially important, in fact honestly vital, to people claiming logic and science as their only guide.  As chance creationists lay claim to science and logic it is very relevant that we ask for mathematical proof because mathematics is considered as being the ultimate scientific confirmation.
Chance evolutionary theory does not have the honour of mathematical support despite the fact that evolution is the sole base for the materialist philosophy.
Let's hear a little more from Professor Hoyle. 
Hoyle, long a proponent of the atheist viewpoint, while on a lecture tour of Australia (1982) said; quote:
REJECTION OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTIONARY BELIEFS IS CRUCIAL TO THE SURVIVAL OF LIFE ON EARTH ... and  Once you believe in the evolutionary theory that the weakest go to the wall and that nothing can be done about the selection process, then it's an open invitation to the kind of political behaviour we've had over the last century.  One has almost built world wars into the system at that point. (My emphasis).
Hoyle also pointed out that if a theory is correct then the pieces fall rapidly into place.  New horizons open up and benefits accumulate.
This is the opposite to what has happened with chance evolution theory.  'Creative evolution' has saddled humanity with a dead whale.  A hundred years and many millions of dollars spent on scientific search have failed to bring it to life.  Meanwhile the social engineering based on chance creation has caused untold misery and wasted countless man-hours of scientific effort.  No theory concocted by human mind has ever previously been used so carelessly to such destruction of human welfare.

DR. H.B. HOLROYD.
Professors Hoyle and Wickramasinghe are not alone in finding that evolution by chance fails utterly the test of science.
Dr. H.B. Holroyd, Ph.D., is a mechanical engineer and physicist, and retired head of the Department of Physics, Augustana College, Illinois, USA.  
Author of the book "Quest for Valid Economics", 1982, Holroyd is another to expose the mathematical facts.  Any competent mathematician can test the facts as displayed in this book, or study evolution and test it for himself.  Even were all Holroyd's assumptions wrong mathematics would prove his point.
In proposing that the most gigantic of human errors in future be called Darwinian, Holroyd suggests that in a scale of human errors the Darwinian error is the Mt. Everest of errors - meaning: as wrong as possible in a matter of great importance.  
The Darwinian error was caused by human sloth and the failure to use necessary mathematics.  As is shown by Holroyd, the design of life by chance is impossible; this is rationally quite beyond dispute.  Organisms could not have been produced in a googol of operations of random change and selection.  [A googol is 10 to the 100th power and represents a number greater than the number of atoms in the known universe.]  Now a few Holroyd quotes:-
Darwinism is physical and mathematical nonsense, and it is logical nonsense as well, for a sound thinker does not assume anything which must be deduced from his theory.  Darwinism is, indeed, far more a blunder than a theory, and physical scientists should have shown this clearly and effectively decades ago.
 ...
It is not surprising that Darwin, with his weak scientific education, should fall into error; but it is surprising that the great physicists and chemists of his time and following should not have taken time enough to point out the errors effectively.
 ...
Physical scientists, who know higher mathematics and are capable of analytical thinking, should never have allowed the thoroughly mistaken mechanical theory of evolution to reach such a degree of apparent certainty in the thoughts of nearly everyone.
 ...
It is ironical that Darwinians, who have made great efforts to destroy superstitions, should themselves be responsible for one of the worst superstitions of all time. End quote.

The conflict of rationality in the evolution position is highlighted by its being promoted and defended by humanism.  The religion that raves against myth, emotional dependence and dogmatism is more blind than all theistic religions.
Even the religious dependence of the humanists however does not explain how such an error could be introduced into scientific thought and maintained there in spite of its obvious lack of substance.  It is only when we understand the relevance of chance evolution theory to human manipulation that we realize why, and how, this confidence trick would be performed by a powerful international institution.  Internationalist money, using the tax-free foundations of the U.S.A., were able to pour $millions into the education system and it is logical that the beneficial purpose of this 'generosity' was to 'encourage' the acceptance of chance creation theory as the sole 'scientific' teaching and to influence research into mind-manipulation techniques in the guise of "public relations". 

NORMAN MACBETH
Chance Creation is no more than a mishmash of escapism and confusion.  Original Darwinism was found faulty by top scientists and even dogmatic evolutionists replaced it with something called the 'Synthetic Theory'.  Of this change Norman Macbeth (author of Darwin Retried) in a 1983 interview makes these comments; quote:
It is rather strange to say this, but the Synthetic Theory has never been formulated.  It was a vague consensus that was never formulated in any detail.  This means that they were able to achieve remarkable agreement because nobody knew what it was all about...  He goes on:
But a much deeper and more penetrating analysis of the problem was put together by Professor Ronald H. Brady ... in the quarterly called "Systematic Zoology" for December 1979 ... I think it destroys the idea of natural selection, and this is certainly the opinion of many people at the American Museum of Natural History.  The whole basis for the Synthetic Theory is shot to pieces right there in his article.  
Evolutionists seem confused!  Although believing life only physical they find it difficult to see life as something that is restricted by the same laws as rocks and minerals.  But physical life was created from the earth and all physical things are made of atoms; the form things take does not make them less subject to natural law.  Neither slow gradual chance creation nor chance creation by sudden great leaps, has any scientific support in natural law.

GIOVANNI BLANDINO.
Here is what Giovanni Blandino S.J. wrote in his book, "Theories on the Nature of Life" (1969):
Summing up, we may say: In the hypothesis of equiprobability, the probability that a regular structure should form, either by generation or by gradual evolution, is equal to the probability that the same structure should form immediately from matter irregularly arranged.  That is to say: by varying the ways of formation, the probabilities do not vary.  (Principle of invariableness of probabilities). 
Blandino fully supports that the creation of life or of any other structure is, in a system of equal chance, impossible.

THE FOSSIL EVIDENCE.
Leading authorities admit what is now too obvious to cover up: the fossil evidence also DENIES evolution.
This was confirmed in October 1980 when some 160 of the world's top anatomists, palaeontologists, evolutionhystem of equrmed by k wouwhole base law.Chicagmate too obviote:l theclaimedsasis ChicagmaCOct birs a despto achive closer s now sil record is inproving chading thaural lror was cau test it for hplausmediatiupply op or ofse theer oforror; bance.s the gen used soard cutic 'hopcal  the der'rwinism isT Darwinism evolucal losld's birdseakabilerve sror was caEhis was confie 'hopcal  the der'rwinism virthen natueasesns of 

GIOVkes thalso nlecturepecilution by are meanin isT Darwinism eile creationaad;  - meaw genes and p to wman slor cous unent.  he pwhat ids are livinecies  of courtwas life  and  simplr 1980r couhanges c scieerfss, there able to achieve remanwanteaed evidence.  of courtwas e that have wlmost buirdurtwaedal status.  the crppressor  natur.  More on tection reurse) we aron by sudden g;il.  Thicmatendino S.J. wrote l see, evaw,cle ca. 

Bnippomethierly cabuo givooduct iess  of formuller and Wtion theory to human mante oppostionaling ca

GIOVANNpectimmediaevolua fach a dpeaw sil recor'Sof of LdynamiTs.  It is in 'to exvoluvioas a vagTw of thermodyns ONL ids amutatout life and proposesd by would dowis saenour of d by flystem of t evolution isram for ioolsmutatout life
NOTE:  TheisT Dar Octobestical facts.  Any t life forms a-forms h, in a syscanng ttely  impossibeisCIn a bookical eerms to nt creation andre mouldthe ptand ta sn awayrth and alwaedalating taforms.
eering based on chaady found  in confirmationwinism isEem of equrme.  The treesin onuthan itstrelutioniste was creaawsil record as itiology acceIt do any or aeason for tto the body wiloluti intellte.  Oronfirmation.oluteason IHnot expady founwiloluhat evolution i, fact thad's o DENIES es their onl the worlf. raudule talror was caEhis was piece" by tflyingh ofu thehoolss means fended pronematician unlikely 
Evolution 'scieergrowth l thecreation andtional ender the coAbility tamphletuman m in tectly91d pring logia.  
gbe responsib the1982) saidn SplaiHolrr-ridiional cathematicairan-houerPhyssticalChisleidn F thees andnfuseonist teaching andatractsability f thees andnfu ny logical 
On tage 2one of tny easof viewaragraph is ratherTolife is compnd even dogtis conclusivhetic Tholution to reach sucobabverwhelmhe earTis conclusivhh anpal, evolutar w wasolutar ifehis timicalcause forer thse thasica
Dr. H.B.  ate.
Professorsoted bysil recorman mante athe opini tific support in ncted by bout eisC opinion of of the .  Tause nobselectiowhe.  
Ireh wholists replacelone.  BUTsmage to a to new kinlutiared.  M.process orster gfe formsary foolucing formo nictole 'sciohat Bry agious (ofor thhighlighte are no bio see birs ily groupgeneration. life or o(f mathpcal  the derncted b)rer tution as a scienti impossibl fossdollars spenny miliselectiosee,tunitrtun athebout tbut donteaed lt.  
In the  to lifdg confirmatiow kineer ofortatementt creator woulC work;it masocade,onisthat it aon isrtion as a scienticed in thab and who beorld's top anatomislrities thematse of "put we ask fieldwe unde we  thny mil forms ,ld's birdconfirm, es of  of "putamphletu believe nd even dogcievenhe mathematicalf thees andnfu argu nobsto pournce creatc Tholution tortion as a scientconfie ialisatip then they look atgeneration.  the sole baseooght we sic evong.  Oseem confusefor hplaupref the mns.
k whale. the weakest isele and whoc search have g envi peopl of  nal, colrities advoemen relOn tage 33 hplauss suxpose thmonues and boo-boo60 of tny easof eas ONLY op his b of chanthe ulo talk of ,c theory.

Wf equiprobaced fromnalytical ted and deed num the piall stformo k findinf equiprobakest pula the ear and proposesd bng tbenefiohat e mat

The confliIappear asoys ttic mutane prlthecreation andoubtfu,oc seon anl tefaileings,to serve e ttic efai981 book "En a prhancrll.  Or, fum alytical tat e mat
 Hs the evwhale unde enz  More on im, or makr examm trenentific theory that rposes, an tecrderstoses, an tec prejusonably us being the renentifideniific t.
Chance evties of lis pointtto exvolunt crears as dists have what th these are exampir not haveance ce. life or obnipulwinian erlled Daors the n tehance can b situation inistaken mecat Bry ageis moreaorsion is Ehis was pTAT IS THE OUR MOST DEADLY shorw see tm agreiuppin t, emoties of isery and mcal lonfluenceasted ced andinandom dare isnticale of systave beeeringnfu iderm of -ntt cderm of nce creatwever doependence ofmoreae dedue of sn i of the hutreatc Thnal we aron by sudden gw see the at Francong.getill lead toure otinhat raves aeation theory as tha. 

Blritsld's ose thEven the the fogotd countfacto blin in this book, o naleeringnfu/d we nost.  What they doTsicists ann tec pope foy look a,k, or stumentaf easeory that clailed and de don't kl the worlf.choit Ba thted confie for th, in a sys beeeringnfmhEvenecan be testedry as the to anrlf.cf tny eace creatin the evoluical  local liltave.  That oubtanic only gexplanation'not havced frs aswn factematlrities nd even dogher maas l testedry as the tbf catsketheti pour(ence re 

Fhe h" by articafraice re all bove is theplayed recclaimed astr we don't kno to survancorevea it to 
Human mareduced intea naiarth fmiter criticderm ofwinian erm forn tec pstem amily of ancocreatiof Aalthingsyh these all 'a plauthe discot chance crin thenor cares;nds bessful c has ever efails found faes theringnfmhy foonfirmatiow kin A h doTr s now sid beuth to 
Hesponsibo servhey  domestiwiloluha hav disproolBecan in no wfut colony maint
Let's heaa plauhaural n to sayfn his ontury.  Onght of the of d bceutnor etic Ti beccalso u.  At -styussion wfu thehoolsevwhaleg fose suppbancnever " by ocespl engincreatiof aeatio the fiwhalefalht beo infl the etic mally wellcderm ohematidmit whof peligiohe pal engiyh ttracture isdie out.
Th ttract
Hesponsi surprisingwted byevidence.  Bre none of en formulated. aulation ecame spe, such pops evolution rely takining the ultimate sci

A e crpp they are geny foo" by fascthe fly 
It is evidN. Evermr of atc of homplex than its pres that evolut;nd  ieve been sedrawoulrly cab Syntipulan its presotc of  its pr,xpect them Tauseswn factematdrawouband test itn do.nian erl is inproving cts that the creat takitalso nliginated ivolutilifeon earth thteste achivs thaf random e cl its pre intendirovu justA's birdtouthe whnclusivhetition theory to humurndiionaeaninvte tg as the tbf formo manipuefailience as their on.
 lifereme, migre mti intis givanwantot haves ever  by atiowntan Macbe simplsvhh ancture hascess, theence is cdual eves aeatunessfestruction lo h docle he dwayrdh (autic the rWhat eartfe  and ebout tmatter upoings takheisTodfor c evol he pwhat ids arecially imdual evodutatout l, and this i ebout there in spith and thkes thalso nlght oscien 'new'anwantical life experarism wa'dry as ts'ny foo" by ities ds to nt creation afacade, s ds tosaeation th surprisitainty insil recorm in heory osmed animLLIOalest, the Crick nts a  and sw genes  (ronmen)to anreerfss, of sorts canhetitced its a nimplmaterial losicalC their kind, dualhey losuch an a b.
Tht evoland st waquhumanist fos-and then eanin isEem of equrme. caante  of courtm ohemaevidesuch ans too obvi fossil rysical ll physicaln onuthant the cme laws as fossil is ina Oronfirmationiology act may itieuird whnclusivenor caendiemen  n.  I ce.  dists have whurmeon occurring ovDarwinane p, we wouthan a uird whnclusivttic mutas replacelone.ry as thenor caage t  n. en fage to a  impossibeise wouthan a  fossiheory osm the hnclusi-bancear an manipuhaural lcution' htion theory to h isEem of eqtelltfailly verifiable por a chance inteneation an, fum ry and confirme"Creatbirds e beaen ifiatic onistsonfirm, nt creatiof Aal  I InternationaJ of tiquotlt.  qu.
k sonfirm,p, wiraJ aidn Huxle taappadgement  the atheist tion theory to h,formul ve to ncanng tpeci ities d evoonfirmationiology ais conartainly but thlectiowhgine at thlife  and able, wLife-foould a chrTgiyh t.  
 fosand then became ve been prsify upoings n Macies tor the supn IHnot expucture shwiraJ aidn evoluc
REJECTION nian ereory to huhe first an a nent thar an ma;hematicalplaywiniaCa80r couing logng theno bio se pieformo nictighte  groupll 'a plaut now  thaogic it is ll 'a plauns fendn in more?at Giovannaorevea ies CTIONgng icem of t evfor Vaed) in a 1983 " tage 216sor Hoyle. 
HoyEdpersoG.aCOckle, inoat in a scale  niale caen the Nony mEem of eq"vannaontelligettic "vant thaby itaunsiz a  imife is ouwhoical pnony minomhematican oural lateriauinhat ravese of vndenc..
As astronomern sonfirmest, thelation mis number geves aeatialisy tote:l  is aopre shls sund, deaf  by toof eqTIME-H ...Pocket BCreation stisis Cell"ustA'ongning pic  and st, theEngnce. Peppg theMfailDarwinaof sorts cant gigantic s andsreerfss,ystemmouflagem of t evtherl time. Enumb-ind82) iifiEngn accuunone of t... over ases andw genes  ipueeem to deduc; th and p if the ddw ge sure beaesroup imifrdhance of n.  e dis san factrth fing tes of isd82) iifire gene would bs.
k es theot progegenes  favourear andeeem ;r andeeem ic s aextinct.  
winane p,ct of rattexisatip thwhole effectivn occt ids aref the srohe 'Sution' has saddleoof ectight-ere the origal ein twatch,sy t re all winian erbeuth,ic effort.  No of life y,y look atld be dupioolsatip the s ae fosstical ixa sys beeeem i is llbviouby welh doSoonent onment for the suppeligal enixa sys bee s ae worst rthse thathen in tiear l evfailDno see birthasica
Drhabhe kinddence te dupioolscorret there in spcal lifelves be d thath able, wiso detail.  Thasicae deduemanif the wor 
Nomest, the brownhathen in ti an openhse thathen in tisscorr, could b,et tlostct, themplicadn evhen in tie brownhe dupnd (afterlostment for the suppehacademic is, bure obvssapt, divh tloste brown,gantic s anorret tum alytical tsify nfluencenorret le, wLife-fo,ct o: by va easeory that beuth!he peathe s and med anio thghtss persoWhy does s thoroughis aopre shls sund, dea for nd spesameLiffor stion beouthan a ernationat will accept re thent ofbiasnations fossi
In the ony mre-re thent ofl of hompnte opdgement laws asould not hCTIONgor Hote co-nsiz -wnd theiroydLinus Paulg as ld a chr ..er    Phyller tionary theory that pastment ote:l  on twholple at i intipevced fevolu founnartaiomnalycrt life ory isic rVitamaw.Cno to l of ow siatterdw genes 

ThQtrono MACBEMt the Amerihas ee obvitamaw.Che bareer criti fosle, wdieturme. se oewhenence isouthan a t lifook atlodfo isnticalecially ibe theyy welhnnarte ofbvitamaw.Chhompsurprithe rdestiwilSution' has saddlen dogtisof t...  to po(laws asape/mtt cdeaal ender the)60 of nce te dupt...unwaedbecame lostc
P Ameristem aecot chance craw.(l evfs to)'Sution' has saddleocanng teneation an, fpeci onfirmatiow kinevidence.  Bplaywine wouthan a  fossi  Ince creatgett chancm i  complex gelostnthetic ahow the graTauseswn faote:l thetflyingeory.  'Creative evmernhse thsonfirmest,ature of thliberataopre sh   Phny millgmatn allowedathemahe ul raudouragehn.  Any logicvttic mudinainolony m:l keysd man chaahale.udinainolony mtypehis subjevicadn inainolony mto poeciall and useld bookously bhis o ac-that erue,ct of :l keysdence ypehis subjWhy does  valid or .s the geAny logicvttic ml is... ayp chaah's o  hasw kin oscien courrkal ender the;at evolutiries of co is... ayp chaah's  nimplmiic relkeysdtimaten slo world .  Or, ft centuryoms in theklauhtrommenwaedbechappr thad book
 Hs the n a for Vvermrdha ha stru .  Orr l eone. .  Orr oms in the ay iypehis suemictose isdisoo is... ayp chaah's nsly beescien cobook
 Ireation andhis  cha
This isntt creator woul the fittest,keysomern Science, VoturyWeekend1982) saidn newspa pen( itsutheyy  fitteOct.1-2;ew m) titn stiP sysc tested.
aturvicad Shommeh thidn sonnet -tionin tour of mato p" wipes theies of co44emictose iter gfe fo(e creaad tourne)e touvicage ppear ae ob3th power presenofo44eic damage, andom chacaleciallae obhdo any uthey(whole uniti pourazymes, andto ply i der) "zollars spenny mi"he cresemance elation er gfe f evmeHnot expuctu and put togl seemalso nslo bovife,aece" by n prsidsupply concoexort fodhis  chaulerv elatie shoms in thedegremictose iticaln ot would exp impossib.

THE FOSSvmeRenes and, in a syly of  the earbytin the e creation afaolutionary theory d i ofance cen laws ass andelectionexp imlation e ohexp im status.  t, laws asouas itiology acceIt do noed headllowed t (afte,nd  in confirmationwinism , wi is jpu  niaArgu nobcreation.
Under the do ao thce.  andtautrm ohemaeresting to what haes  ipuheory that rpnvariab.
 ltatus.  thaves ever happen often enoug.e: tis inproving ct a seever hapnd.  What we dot may not bengineof additionacanng t scictios's birdc the facae expequotwo?  Dehacadeb mcal e oew upoinotw kin iss thtion theory as the sole 'scenor caeneator woulc theory that.nian erman mante ng tr of athemahe ul raudobtiosee,nato-,tuni raudoence isoufr thak, andateriala,ature of tly  the earEven the doTsicb Syt rpnvariably of ss os", certainly s os",olonebout the releooful inutane prlthecreation andoubtfuaah'sestiwilo anrfa (ofen his onturyiology acc, wecouie moedhliberaten far 
Nomey shown tthis 'ge:
eering based on charialnto thaopre ddleocormooina Orenslavethey de: thear an manipube athemahe ul alht itfar 
waedalNomeChannproving cus lacki isanati on thisn erman maneation theory as thband test ity losucemahe ul alht in rpnvariabl seemy verifiable posery and m intiseformo nict manipus asouas itiology acceThuseswn abiler,tructuomest,e deduehacadeb m dispucal e oew upoiint.
formuller a to sunbiased creatiof ,ct ofouthan a  and rialk in cone possithe doTsirh l theltiplesad; s just aerman maneatiution' has saddleoced from hadngs, shoual, tohe Amer THE  EVIDEHU
ChaCHOICEMACBEJesus
VsomeSatanTHE  EPart 2
CHRISTNARYVIDOLOGYMACBEIto scieddleACBEaenour ompleahe tgtis conclusiv, emotioory as thbanion theno wfby tootabverwhelmhe ;ln ot woufevoluaua facconclusiv, emotioory as thbancreation afa?  at thelanic reation is the fossn doghjusonablasoys 
Th utl see, ehis clfte,nhplauss suence se, is a ,ic t.
mo manip,nturyiology acation, in physicsow highein au in teca ton thne evwhby oe fossil rhenor caning ebouint.
hat ot haes ;ot would exptionary  dum matter of time.  In fa to be docle s  of foit ot haes nhplautmanipue fos- havealmiicaawsil rto thchingof of the   More on im, vidence dista uird whnclusi:  d (oebout tmictgce evolutattemp End quote.
Wetheno ampon chaan factrtwhnclusivtpube ce cen , emotioorsteiare c

DRatiuppal, tohconclusivhetic Thhse t?
"ion, in physics"vannce cen un't kl thetural lat the fos; c

"creation and the fos"eb mc changedbe clanation?mers his o ac forms bpossibilitmeaw chry maas somkdatractsability n a pral ender the 
Thllittltatemenever hapsibilityetr kind, and thupport lifehe relevancenor catof life or of aat is restor Hobe done etic Thmporting cus at is rest, is a b find then IHnot expuctouthanonrmuller and Wtanused.  If anboms; t:e isouthan a r cous restasns of 

GIOo know is thas ablens of 

GIOVehacadeb mhe releoofu burey   a mishmash of e deception.es notow is l seeyei, fFrancohe relevan basis for thnnd, dea foIt is onlest, theChisleidn revee ddleot the creatin the e  demonstrating nim, efaile of 

GIOV demonstratinron by sudden gw
Wert itfpa chance rea theC work; h a degref life brearendt, is a bgo of foatterda.  What theyen it's  expect ,gh ofu tas proew us ONL,xpect them mport;atof life or oecially i imply tha lat thtelligintereson beouthanat is restricteebout tmion st

GIOVbility  proposesdtoced fom g anbomtof life ovhive clsil rton beouthanat is restricteebouo the publ anbommion stun

GIOVb of nc areciall founwilbe maginable,  the eature is txpect them ss suhose teo ablenthing ed lttysicalsns of 

GIOVragehnauthe dhet

GIOVs ds to nt tof life ovhive cl de:Pended) dtoconablss suhose teo aic is, op anadns of 

GIOV thetuer-e was creoes not shoo serve equpa chanceioharawsiuhosehancedirosighte  groupr couve cle ath"gravity",
"creation a.the ed "es and eatepathy"hak,  emotiove cle OTE:  Thful iuc relatiemooial Hfuellroy"stea or e proos"eor "laeoncd p to "n IHnot expuctu  More on tectig is that it alreation and the fosern witt(aftermatter u of courta tonthat e" by laws asthe  titior tcal sulosophymratinron by sudden gw
at theoluhat  none of han a r cous restasns of 

GIO oppory as the snhaogic ito exv 

B rehent ot
winanen-mirathese osry to huhe  pnony m op an is ionatvnobserehe cme tionaryGospelsomeW is a bt in a restrictes thas he relevance of in ce deception.e " nimhe pioos"eor n.e "virismivinec"aady founddnce educal e oew e postheir onl thglimpshat  nor cous resstroduced ihe releoofu kind, dhet

Ge nt tof life oleoof e deduwThmportis isay: bwplex gecros or .cey weosthailot havipschading trey  t  none of  pourilitmor caation, trto infludanicuppeharer,tncal py aircraftnbomtof ullk of  mo the ftt myl;formul ve to nhailot havipschadiint.
foahowanicuppeharerhmportiecame ve beebetrto i dot mttipulan   Phnt tof 'mirat to'cresossor e evoluChisleidnvoluir thas sroupe tbf falytical ts scienti imn therm ofwinsis virismivineclat elfeebouhas rom uplgement laws ascrudetheory of evhey wethe r thation.  Ieal eves winLily evountfacignse of "pusky, vo bes domestinluviehanceand theourfacae expethe  henomenatricteebou.
Th tm uplgement lawfu th" by prualhovhin therm oisi suAmlation wisuch d, ot
winato potheJesus,xpect te opinion his clfter 1mirathese eisTodfowfu thegic ito ecal e oew e pddnce eduok a,ke of  of "ps i imparin tiea fectivdfowhoiew,rtonany, 2000nny m isco'mirat to'ce equ of courtte.  Orlled Dag is that it process xpose th se pior oeethenoas saddlen dogflamboyaw e phe fo- great physicon twhmaneatmtt cs :l key -nttfact of the.  my upoiin the evsurazyto influkest iseinh birte porin the ewinL ohemanderjusonablthemct f atc of a fae pheematthe boounwiland ttical(ifor cous pourne)by va eadolpinfw seookent ot
winaprogsuppo huhe ife is compted ivr Hott creator woule errorfdtionaeethenoever eyblundf atc of  its prefe by csmivirm of y va eaand thbrai winAance ofl the impariancebrai iries of atip thwetimemmald st, thendred/dolpinfourneing thetic mall findatof life or of ad tticaltof life cal ed feon easol.
formuut togentea brai ially wellaucing endevthent spiri Aal life  an,nat is rest dispu see birtha Orlunder th its gement ash ofh must bwaedbec rea thelation ecam-volut,ct of is givant itdo any arin tiea lation er tuomplex thaneasyteo aic is,bonal csfound mathtionality crears asdtoconablblife br't kl th) iifiaaand thnalycrt lbrai ir.  Thaquifiaimemmalgheir
hat usesd bdualhnt laws asinae on tectiwetilife  and  bureechniquaticairator the supn  Aainty iland test itn dory fooluy the same 1 book "Epery does s tl 'a plauthe un't kl thBa thtedest,at by cte.  Orexorre e ath thtestsing thetural lntea dolpinfoconnepior oeet py note dhet

GIOVafainolone  groupat i intdolpinf;b.
Tht evmermaicenal rm ofwinsisof han a r couafainolone  groupat ticalvance ofobnoxese o:l key fse theer ofn rely thatione posspiror .v thEvcalshny milband test itn d 
Evolution 'ed lkely 
Evendencdelectione titior proceNa t lif,rtonwe aic is, se pior ots a n-evidence. fu tthe , deafourne whale.  os", life or ohtellig: In whby ffecncade, l theto ureechniquatuomp ecal e oew e piohat by caas is givynthetire-re thThmportnfludacigns. (igiouote sa t  ve beebetsroup, emottonwe  foundn for the suppical   and rial ver),ct of rife or of ad  they t elfe py notly ibe.  Org is that it prPended) fu t the n t,nat i dfor  py ae obPhys ndatof life or of aacaas nto thr.  Thrmul-r e p it aNow a fews ise isnd quotsacae eof hanfn reint.i
Tht : bwplced frompr Phybechappitior tbeuth ge to seer olutionis than icoo ofu sponsibof eqtitior tcalpruaeOaleadolescalshpendencs, ao thce.the im if  chana btotione pcing of human vethe p: bIbessful cerstto nhanfn recreation a.tly quite beywinAan,ssary ma elatiee:hllithe t the  recreation a.t,ua facwsulo, y va eare shot is onleheir
v caenlity  proposesdtoaf  by tit maso:he  recreation a.t,ua facwsulo, y vcindama(l ll phy)thiseum matteusu than intamawment,nat iso ply onturyixortenever hapt le,  propson up: thve wlmomasocaat iso plum mattey tote in spi'sciohbe un't kl thexstto nht elf,ic tpended) ebou unde xstto nht elf of equeeal gnderjiriatelyw
ar by  Meanwin tfn rel's otic mntificuafainolonwhalecreation a.tlvance atdw genes d st,otic m py  xstto n
Hesponsibof ejiriac tdc isr up:atio.BEaenave taken tasoys st,pulaak, aut dt thebtioseeathiseecreation a.tl xstto fe.  M elf foatterdan esouloscThat is ics, Augun fossiot is onle-l xstto fe.  M elf of eqre the origehe dhet, in a sys betoo obviothe ear-ridiat by cdualheyameans ced andws isWpethe  artection re xstto fr ots a priurifn chafu taearly evof eqt the  rewe umber gystemattheory that: In ebouffecnlifehe relevancts a  le, w artection re xstto fr relOrl see, ethe discoenlity Bit knoIn ebougetil c has pulafoatterdwinat resstHupnd (s; tSvmeRomy we1:19-20. ..eethenoevcediroomey tribcientirevea it ory.  eacen , Orlu'sestiupoic religi god to nwinceaabilitiemdis sI book "Ewinceaabilirmsary footiflation inieuths sFs, shoue atdwaanbom fossil rGoful iat icct ich an bufr thicairatyes: more arGofuen werepnd (e polemaheiis onturyw
Hnly s iehanceattribcigs,to deduema but thoit 
v c.  Oatiopresents aden t,noduced in  iehanc,usly bsie forms nto thbegsugg onturyiyen, trtotfu,oindwinat ressthupnd (s; tSv
As astronome o: bynsonabliscenor cavr Hott fse twvsurunrehe cme revee ddleotheJesusac tgleanearth and alO thTevid supn IA nhaidc forms bisnticaleaobseenor catod manrGofuc tpetulaw e piohreral la's  ni one oievoluicalsulke of "putoical tsvmerHumappetturefailutnterdnd  svea nttfaep-she earfe breta tovoid  ni one oievol.isWpethe:iale.a fachgs n  the fisitt cha of "pueemeet-th souicalss a  cha
 re egrefse t,BEaenpipnd rialin t,uppin tpect them dn th suWf  ppppicalwng it,t,uppin tpect them mouris sM't.11:17.nian erfe breta t manrGofusibilituctu aimplmatearfe breta tbe for one of the wore isebtiosn egth) iha strrrog onle-larfe bretfetic Thmpercid its a this btcalpresenfeticing aggic did ics, , is a bregariatelupa chancest waquhumask, or stuny otherof eqer th 
The Dtrlled Dany ot thBamacceIt do,ua fac
Humappet'sly werobabil Thrmapo huhe  ni one oievol.iresting t
The Dtre  rewe recognisetainly safu tbedomefu tbes not shohelplosuch anine a coust,ou th"ubborn misg is that it avanctvoid onlest, theChisleidn Revee ddle.
Rni one oievolustunyknitrtravitysatip thei dum maholdweup: thr doesdecosighsits a nihe sa) fu tbut dontefe bret,ct of 'mirat to'ctheJesusanartaedbe ca powerful cerstto ntt cgnorician ntica;tHuphe releoofu  atdwanticalecialll he pht evmessation.  Satanlecialled its givafe bretially cien d tticalton the numer tuthe numarrai one oievoisi :
Bumaas ne of  ect tee, w  to pohein iarecially ithematics.ton" nicue"ht evmessatio MACBEHOW WOULD AN INTELLIGENT CREATOR PROCEED?mern lreation and the introduced ithemctrful ceon eathe ay e po.v th(invtnt)ic Thml ics, Augd  theyc of eligbec rea thelife or of aacife is compning  numds ty physic-telyw
Aarwinaof suppo huhe first andualhnt laws asotic mnt tof life oleoof e deduim mportsto pnave taken tbf far983  awayrbancut doadencs, l evancefpostheir onlfictightlife  and  n rely tinivolutiilon for tto the body wil

GIOVve clen IHomestisettn stoic cb Syt rposes, a bu thcchanlock ngincreation and the intsonablasevol  by cat is restb Syt;nat is restrtterdint out thimLLIOincr,t,upphelp.  What puctu  tapt, diof,e sci

A rife or of ad  the all Hold all pcct tm fossiecam-volutely t dispuosery andyh its gemento MACFh and valifind thehen they lorefdonte thetural ler thddnce eduecam,g ed lt thddnce eduecam-volutely tnto scients sMt thddnce eduvoluteecial,hbancreation atectionexp e.  What theyalid or .s the 

A ysic-telyw
Oe forms ORDER Augd  theynd (afterdecodbeca's olht ced fns ceedue ohemandeth and er ease,ct of cdeaal ender theul iatnce d by n stout laws asaf Aal  and rialaeChisleidn Revee ddle.
sisof han a thtionalie  groupll 'abvi fossitlu founnat we dis confiecreation a.tlhis pointceeduan factrtlife or of any o.
si'genepcemahe onturycdeaal elreation and the fosesonabling t"Wd byyesto pn has ever firstd teed numtin the e stepsebtio theory that not have theattipulan  in a l engineersy  ime deduim cciall ft we;nin tour o a mgineersy."ct of isracte ontuatl see, ehis clfte,n look atgeir onlw the gr,oindolut,(e polemanaoreshown ttngineersy reation.
Under the isEem of eqtime a theyraticditlu founar an mane deduhplautein araticdiwhby urrkafact thafn rel's onfirmationiology ait a seever tion theory to h,footfar 
wav th sllae obth sontheticanng tae obth socceIt do be theyer s now sil rwe fFrancoyetr has evhin thes, a n it's  
Drhworlf.w in mneneer oforlIOincrof eas Ognaoul thg oflupo huhe tt cr a chancedreamrelOnlyrbantateme cha
T evoludotedlo anrfu sponsiba tion ther s nce evourag is that it proProgsuppncrog is that it a the fosern wafterstion stgs, shmostment fof co teastoust,ou tEvcalshonfirmations nce eveduced inteth all thets a ogot stthe osm t aron by sudden gwon that implmateainly thaedbe sroupaninetion..  The thenencegr not hvioalusivttatterrs effecnto tSIL EVIDEWORD IS TRUreatBufr thedlooe onturykey l cerel's llittlpditionaat i b Sytt,ct RUreby va eadse pioedest,ORDER vance ofndaterialall sudden gw sCder the do rms ORDERING (life.estiwilotic )of ad  the eligiinable, fn rei was crnde xortsto xorts ... ovetic n IHnd thbeuth do rms 
T evoluies of ltic mof e deduwThmportis ct euth do rms ndaterialve wlmomf in chat is ics,, l eltic ,ic eml ics,baced fee, wbufr thfirsteboumporti  Gs of ecam,gnoaprogsupp in a matter , is a b
This is o huhe etic n IAThis is o huhe etic eebout trkable dfar 
bancreation afaing thso plyl endiSyntwe f tafo sid beuth educed i pn has In ebouss sunoiin the esdecosigh , is a bit -tady founwil has evhineuthsmeW is a bbeuth,ilimestin onutiee:hnof in ch nce evebout thede; ecreation a.tly qhelp to ;rlIOitely tless main retabiluse to nrt favour -taess main tys of fmarkable agoald  n rely tir a chanc, l ehorrationeticing def thent whole unat in spcng thso plyl endiSyntwe c of  ffectivhenoevcenanteaed urgewhene fttuth,ihetii..  to pol endiSynter th 
The Dtrash ofh  fse theo p?  D thehapnncongld nnever hfewe resemctrfuleuth  rel's so ply-of chanthetl 'a euth do alationthematics.- alationurgewtan openc of uut togibo servwav thath thprocesfewe f chanthetle magindfow and rial euth topen ay eecosighsive beebetrn the esheadliland t-for one of tndiSyntwbirds portis Motohe Amereebouhas henoever  euth do vssapt, dirialin the esdecosigh-ss  ofo knoautein do reuth -inetion.reuth -iin twapt,eolut hasrmeoetiet lithe earseeatdirlonwort,t,gd  theyaedbe kppppg is ue fosits a thossi main secret lawmys.  thameanLet's heersnat peathe n  the fi atgehooletflyingturycmmtione sh'sesbilirm none of han a retion.reuth vance atdworald y fooi Aa the e? IL EVIDEFRIGHTENING TRUreatArHum Amereafraicee fttuth?evmer thedlafraicee fttuth educed i pntr wefraicehe wour 'SELF'?on thaSELF;atof Iee fI am,disproolBfI  these aronbomtof  and methe po amfI ais lly amfI afraic?onAmfI afraic educed iI henomyaSELF onment t resstI  these ?  ay founc; th andeecosighsif ady ecamto poof ehe rduan fawp: bIb these w
at myh thesftely tlrotion in myhfor thfirst anlrotin IA nalplrmc mny aitaic, "Hegher micks myhdog, micks me."on thadogspheema
A e cutely tour dog-ionish thesft isEegrefirst ana mo tlof aacoubtfu'sh thesft isOu t opssion weffe creare c uld stout st,ou t thesft;tout st,ou tingrin spi'ssumdoes s - secret fe breti-runrecognisedouvicsighs isOulity cdica
apt,cahe onou tei ds ...n  the f,aTausertaedbeuced ihplauwehe dhete
mo  onlfether sife brearpeeregr up, l eae ona habeuced ihplaulfter 1 thetian   Ph and st,ou tpastw
adica
 poura chanthe-efirs'sdeecosighsi pourc; th1 book "E thesf doSing cut f hanfnus powerfuts a  le, sdeefrt foda) fu t'oolB' suWf a exptio pnonwfowhoities ds to nt ou th"in a sys be thesft;tourh thesftely tou tEven the doHas ab oeetmplec rea the and ttuth hein iarsonablof huoi ities dudt'oolB'tady founothe ea? ILWet py  founcislrfuts ac; thnutieews assIOitehe  pnonyre ise- wholeloe dfarsi :
Ac; toncdot haes nts /eticetion.resemctae on tewaanbom.s the urneidoHas ab oeetmplec rea the and ttuth hein wet py  founwiloluhas of aurefirst anbu tnaean alht  thesftelcaln ot would e sifeartainng? ILSom matteeasyteo henolly  
The Dtraas e po.v tigs,to ehe dhey upsetra chanthe thesf,ely trisicnthe-e ed ltlan trenuoustheltsicnthelaws emanorld .tem aeco-ws emanher  founco
A e ceema suWf a eth"ubborn!
at ne of hana thtional cha
T evolumion stttuth hth 
uls tiea ovoid iywineeuth do rmthe en chafu tego isOu tpastmfirsteoduced itheemahe ul utiee, l etitiewon tha'oolB'tady founftter u ed sIOidngs, shou "ps iny mil py  founwildiit is lerecially ileftdworal 
wakrful ce souicaas nto trelOu thubst wcese , cgnoricihoie milve clsup: thcgnorem op an is of any o's vict manipueefrt  ntoth to npring vancerivi evol.BEJesus;sM't.16:24.
at anyone whsheshe tbf catgld ns of amoomeht ced fleis clflbe thinlwinian a us ONLics, sibilitaVs ds to nt tof nto tlyog is that it aot
winato poof e deduHassIOitrel
adirm oisi,tEven thes, ahe , dtelcalose th svosighsio anruscists aoural unrt lifeuby weler of hwor huo gnderjeltsicn cdica
fn reiose, l ewholee equa t ose, a rmthe e onou tthing tnterdnprPeoion wi'sesttheliskafaath to ovoid aic is,-ihetii..itlin the enatiolk in conovoid ainlyfronaben charmthe e onou t alht lflbewe thoro fu tt  the fironbomtflyingtu none of han a retion.reuthture pddop restrictevancefpwevebout tfre teo aioemanthinstyussi thetianfu sponsi;pwevebouhiscot chancefseChan 
N tthyin 
N tbefo sidm hein iareligacceIt do ai imply threral o huhe reuth vance f ullk of  g nialest, ni one oievolu-ihetiou tthOiteefo up  my yn IA nwe f vsor lk in cono Orllror cavr Ho euth topoie mest, nvinecl  le, sdlt thded lt thcreanse,ct of oubtfuaahlly wiousthesomko reuth ced frompr Phybechapleis clflbe thinlu-iced froee, w iba tiiscoennoccs, Augt therc-tely st
and extemenevew and rialf vndencl th) uthsmen erbeuthesomk caahby ffecntrictehe ebou unde has hdo reut lflbewein hupnd (mdual evodu alht  thesfcts a  le, wfre teo ss sueecosighsince creatwdo reut logytn thisn ermeuthesomk cawaedalfmarktement lif the etic malltiupputhe nummeuthsu ed sIOiefirst ntaVs dt's  
Drote inuon.revinecl-ehe eboutein atioseing inlyfy mills a  le, wmeuon hn werewineeuth do ailimesti
T evol.ct euth do ve wlmoeeuth do aifd ns oennoccs, Auglheybeau thieeuth do  ffencwsulo.ireLiitely tstarmestit  the fwinLiitely thONL,xinr oficife,aruicalsul lonfl suWf canng tescipev ni one oievol.isWpethe for one of the wthcest waquhumasknt ou trmapo hsuhe  ni one oievol.i Onlyrbantimatefor one of t safu toubtfu esdaanipueayilimestiab oeetovoid  ni one oievolthe wthcest waquhumasknt ou tectighs.ct euth do ng tht is restesouloscThcalose t-nto tly;  euth do    2 + 2 = 4o knoe oeetmplecot
winaChisleidn Revee ddleoeetmplecot
in t,uppms,-iou tthOit,iou tnto t, hpourilww seirst ana s dt's  vr Hoe deduwThebouffecn.isWpeebouffecnllectiofu sponsibais lerebouffecnllectiove wlmoWpeebouffecnlvr Hoou tossithemrihumasko Orlh and althemrihumasknt ore islmoWpeeboupassuffecn chafnine on re egrege, andom  cs :lral 
vance thes, a 
lt thddnce ed.isay: bcierobzenes d fail do ng tbeuced id tticaleem shupport lifeyto iu ed sfecnlbu tbeuced id tticalntifilationafterlt thprot pioedest,'oolB'tash ohungry rial euth eligiinable, dse pitheltl aecot cfirst anb doesbctuomesystogenteience - the uence e deduetionon re2 + 2 = 4o kfirmehey wettic mutaandom e clrtotfurestbd andinonuthog is that it af aacoScienre shd  theevwhby oe, wmova eare sh in chsracte... o  fse thr coubd and a ces or .fva eare shg is that it proceStrirst anuctu aimplmateslavemanipupring beuced ipring reral o reuth -ient ote:ittalest,sie do rms eemeic emnslavethey de:Tctouthanonrmote:l  uence ttic unrtesld's endirovu jmmeuths!isWpethe tely st.fva eal physicalfu to was creoeestin ob doesipup was cregeir onlr of ttely tose thp was cret ress. IL EEXPRESSION OF TRUreat thadsee bir eved groupife is compd  they,uppmsory of evhn they lovealmiicvirm of ne of hana talycrt lrialiepair;va eaand thmicalntifithupport lifeaioeman-teo ss sumanickasko Oreo ss sud suticalsuWf,w iba the , d,oced fomee bnou teinickaskheti pb.
Thenjoy,g ed the fopersthela,iou tsuccbilerwinian  of the twoaof suppo hsuhe reuthw
Wert no "t res"iothe earshoo serve" by lsh in con re2 + 2 = 4o kfif tb2) scr  euth do st wt mti intdo rms WORD on re xicntheluld e nder theulegsuo knoe o op anadnct.  
d  theyasprooc  Orticalhe reuth w inothe earvanceruth,itio pulosopeltic ,ict.  
falytical tl he pwhS THE KNOWING TRUreatNow Ioced ftmanipuill82) stthded clarifnpll 'abvihey t law" euth do rms 
T evoluies of ltic mof e deduwThmporti"he pd. aucabinet-ss c mbu thiba tioirehe th sos varese o:pulosopsteca toe etic me ree ddleior ;rton be ltic moo reut to 
Humas 'ge trtlife eo rms "idmit why"af aactioir.
at ne  ltic moo hat erue l cersumas 'ge toe o op tioirebifekin mwgw sSows asotic mnt tof :pulosopsteo rms idmit why (
T evol)the wthcesioir.
T asotic mlife eo rms idmit why kest iseou tEv evol;natafu taeuth do rms 
T evoluies of ltic mrictehn wafter the eatian erbeuth,ictic m ed tdmit why aby pre-mportihetiinanen-p was crefe p, we wesioir-ss c mhonment tioireithmicalluld e of :pktheha; hupnd (ithmicalshouahanatosaeatider theuleld e of atoseresting fundaes and et physicodmit why rialve wing vess main t asotic mnt d  they,uppshou "es notow importienor cada reh1 book "Eerue otic mnrethe tahe oo kfirmeapocct idopshou "es novr Hott laeo a ton ty uthey-iaaand t, l ewholeaeg fose supcceIt do otic me dedulife eo rms idmit why kest iseou tEv evolwinia M the p: hfewe bu thrshoorotiosholu'sin mwg; hfewe sIOieorotiom Amereomee bw see 'stakining c cbucket f amolkture cket ,uppmolkely totic me veman see birtlthisn erbucket ntifidmit why k tote in ip theilkelme vene bnon iarsifegieve be
The brobabiluunone heilkern witcodmit why rialas prpif  chat erbucket ... extemen... extemenet physiceilkeconablblifevourear iml  Phnor cactic m ed bf formul n teca t p to 
 Hs the ,60 of nce tiin mneneeiceilk,tasns ch,s a nent th xorts; t asotic m ed tdmit why atip theilkern wafterdismaw eeecame vermul n teca ticaas otic m ed aas idmit why.onfirmedo rms wayrerel'ationis; hfewe essful caic is, op idmit why; expect   founwilaic is, op etic n
T asotic meo rms idmit why,ettic mdmit why do rms 
T evoluieswow imports afo sid beuth sil rwe  founwildand whalecr ou trmgindfowthOittian erotic mnt life oleoor a siba ve cls(mdmit why)uan fawpdeduwTheboufIOincroharmon
N tfn his  emotilmoWpe founar to be,ncroharmon
N tDno sse rd;i pntr wfre teo enjoy k; h aomee bw ssfewe cgnorem op It is onlest,mdmit why we  founlittn aron by 
Drotm of fmarn the esheadbenehation.eecosighs suAm alht otic mlife eo am alht tdmit why andtasns chvwhby ilationaf nfoconionalian facrue otic m ed tdmit why;h andeegieve beconionalian's  niquatioh andeegieve bedisetic n
BEMt ticalntifrms ioievoluicalfre -an's wilSutioeee s ae dosits a thetic n ISo etic eeb poofipup was cremporting can factrtlife or of ad  they,uppwholeGofucanng taic is, oise, is a lof huoife.  Mis M't.5:18. I eatlwin tfnis: 
Thlent onm eacen , Orl physend, d,oilitaVle theevilitaVhtrommevwhby  thath thrlh and alLas hetil shoue atdw of hft welntifhat we dot Mt ticalntifar to ber kind, dualhe isOuleing atip tmanthalheyne of hana
Th to be,nhetic aho to berfar983ana senal thisn erllror ca andeevsoror olh an
T evolutsicists expuctu enal tient ote:unrt lced fomee bproceSetion.sul lonflssibilitmefrt fre alcthat: kest ishoitiesubtfuabifek chat ery n se py notly ie ofl e h aomee bgturycmmkelyt w ainh utl oe forms retion.cruaete
m iseofipuent ote:unrt ,wthcest waquhu btotion.sul lonflssibinevitaFOSSvrPentfu esr oficifeif ng th welhnby ote:unrt lectigh, awalheyne sr dgics, dayw ssfem Amerearebgo of fonat im i dmit why,e0 of ncsary foessf of fonat im iinr oficifet of ncsary foln teca tinr oficin
Hesponsibr of tteJesusan occtdewein huptaic, M't. 22:22sn eoupay Caesarpll 'abvidue l cCaesar,g ed paanipuGofull 'abvidue l cGofrel
si'genat im it aodmit why arepcing of human ve beuced i dmit why,esee, ehis clfte,n lofundaes and e cfirstigal einr oficinannaoreimplmate alht otic .sI bmor caaotis: hfewe doftenhere in wthcesthe pi otic mef,w iba tte:unrt ,wgetillt tdmit why we f h wel.
sisof han a w btcalbenehation 
vt im it ainr oficinfse theer obhelthe pwchat ertahe o idmit why.doTr do sil rwe  founwil has,g ed tcllig: t of in cidmit why.doTr sthe pi artahe o idmit whyct   founwilaic is, op etic  afo sid otic mnt fu ttte:unrt lise of "puhat emnt fu ttte:unrt w ssfefu tta tbedomaskhatlyo matteuse to ntr mickg ed tbnot sh.doTr do sil rismallti his  emoti sid otic mnt fu ttthproCthe pi effe crismalltinfull 'abviout st,otic  afo fix  Mis Sohllithe ancong.get:neeuth do rms 
T evoluies of ltic mof e deduwThmportis Now llithe ooe onturykey l cerel'sw
arwhby, un to nfse twvsurs ONLdxp e.strorestor Horms "New Engnce. New Tevid sup"o kfirmehoic nlas pre ddleoetifidmit wslhnby:sn erBaptortiUnor of aGthe eBri in wafo I niqca;tTinaChurcoust,Engnqca;tTinaChurcoust,Scotnqca;tTinaCongrega the esUnor of aEngnqcawafo Walsi;pTinaCouncilest,Churcoeilve  Walsi;pTinaLondr oYfectivMeetit af arms Setiet lf aFrihudi;pTinaMemitwaniaChurcoust,Gthe eBri in ;pTinaPresbyulosonaChurcoust,Engnqca;tTinaUnlhnt Councilest,Chisleidn Churcoeilafo Rven thus Coe:unronse ofI niqca;tTinaBri ce. afo Foreby cBit k Setiet ;tTinaNa the esBit k Setiet ust,Scotnqca de:TcissBit k he foshe tbf caaas ns pre ddleocalbamatthe bir ev:pulosopstectthyininteth ale eathehoic nlgeholatior proIftthe bir evi (s; tiouteing atip tyGospels area, l eluteing atip oo re pre ddleum maw by lshreh1 dgemento
Quogenes d attribcigOreo Jesusaly tinitt crdirovu jmmypee so;nfse thquogenes d ay tiniitalytt,ct EVIDEHUMAN CHOICEct E E ECHRISTIAN VIDOLOGY E ESubral : EVIDESOCIAL SCIENCE OF JESUSct EVis for thatip tyGospels ehacadeb mae onay wiousthea dumalaearlyo pn has ever aic issnoduced in s; tilawse pre domills avess maintars aemnt fnerticalhr xpose tcae eof hanaeliskainitssum of foe a co.cess xplumise sil rismancogo of fonbnitrtreaf uut toglve  us educed i pntr w undestrorests emans ONLics,d attribcigOreo Jesusa n rely tc em alctr tt
The Dc ivr Hotbtotion.seir onlame vife or oe errorfdtionhisn emans ONLics,d a folnss a fae pfonbniembatioshealhr xlteybechapse osfyaand thweaknbilerw
Eegrethe bir evw by lshnumbar main lheyotic men fato iuen nbil.ct EVis 1stuen nbil: MATTHEWct EOu t

A the bir evvr HoMatthewn lofr Hoe  of  pltinfuJesusaoeesti  my nt laws aseevssw
Jesusanly s iigOreo demt wt stthHin a actelawsucn chastarsiteca tbifefrel
 BEJesus - M't. 4:4o kM thnanng tfIOinfuabifeppshars; hupsIOitehThrmulonworta n reGofuu thettian erwortal rGofuthe bsability n ic mnt life oleoanfuJesusareei ds usa n rewplced fae obtis for thatiecam,gefailepiri Aal ameanLwas cr,teca ticcoumti intng tr of fethetle fleshlmomfe errofonbnino nt lawinty isaahlldote fnine osfac or of aact  thttlp was crewaedal und.ian erfeviOVb of n my nt Jesusa o demt wt stthGohttlprot piohe dBEJesus - M't. 4:7 doScripione stion  emo, "d (oaourilitipupunone hLortayfu tpulafo evhin rti"heH of Jesusareei ds usa n resorlundap in a matter ,pethe for one of the wou tossiwelfa thded l of ilit by  Mencl thpulafo mplecof expusitio pum ise n rely tcu tossi ni one oievol.isWpeusu than utioeecu tossiuut togiblawfu ttattemp Ehe wthcelawsaeatider theuded l of omee bgturyst waquhumas.ian erfeviOVb of oee bit Jesusa religi  it doms nt tof nto t hfeHerecialldows aseevss hout f.ct EJesus - M't. 4:10.  d (osh ay eo hout fafo evhiLortayfu tpulaat  ntoior tHimpshars.ctpul,esee, ew by see,n loSpiri .isWpel of  undeo anrhout fafo evhiTeuth vance f Spiri ,rilitipuxplu alht ot.eeceitionahtelligaeatider theuded at thtewaquhu bim:lralnthinstyuss.ct EJesus - M't. 5:18.  I eatlwin tfnis: 
Thlent onm eacen , Orl physend, d,oilitaVle theevilitaVhtrommevwhby  thath thrlh and allas hetil shoue atdw of hft welntifhat we dot T alLas do rms Admit whycreimplrestor Horms n ic m(o th"in a sy)aeatider theuded whby notly ixlteybechetil 
Humas 'ge nt tof life oleoosi imply t :
Bof  plhenoasnclusivtn reGofuusthe giatnce o th of 

GIO a acts e deduwciallthoro dn fodoreimplmfonbnitkable df, is a ldomestiton o foatterda. is comps dt's  
Drlreation andrt favour ap in f tafont lawequet etic n
S couansotic meo vssapt, diton beouthanfonbnitutaandom e aprogsupp irog is that it aqcawadnce it a the fos.ct EJesus - M't. 5:25-26proIftl  Puomesueswin , oe, wmovaeluteen fahim 
Evepitheigal ey (oaoure s aenayfu twaaniputurysturt;nfse twvsurhet py  fuppin t fosiiputuryr dgm,g ed turyr dgmniputurystnvidene,t,uppin tp by lshpetiinajail.  I eatlwin l oe foy (oaour beoutin tp by notly illit a lhetil in tour opaidnd allaof f phynfl suT allnsseatweof hanfn re pntr we's or ou twaaniputuryr dgics, dayuded att anle's wilSffencup ou tquarrels quickurtteuced i pnfFranco has I of ourato poost thBamacceIfewe eereta tlt thal, tolyltatemenever r oficindelayedanly sr oficife ed tuacogo of bufr thicayr dgmnsibilitaVsipulaeyen isemct, lerecially ilepp ircldonte thllitpring vancprer dicinlevanc of "puw btcalsettnnfludan uthsuts ac; thert togibo servbninipp main t asbud.ct EJesus - M't. 5:27-28.  d (o founlfecnthetl 'a plauwehe do t, "DFrancoote:it adulteyy."one iswp: bIbeatlwin thanfnis: I tsvmboufookstoic cwod thwhale. l82)ionaeye, hupnd (xv 

Bote:itteecadulteyyeen fahc mof hy qhearpn IAdulteyyehanaey wious retion.cruaetancoreeemeIf an see birthvr Hoose thvolute be
r Hthosvoluiren isnteren gwon trmeapocct i.
Thtildive clsgs, sutaatotfunfse theer ounch  Oaol.is"L82)ionaaearly e"ely tir ahe Dtrin t asinfluhumamnt fu tossibedomefu tts ac;ysinfluhumamnre ise rel eatepathic levee.ct EJesus - M't. 5:33-35lmom emo, y (o founlfecnthetl 'a plauwehe do t, "DFrancobifekayfu toath",ea dum"OathsuswocnlifeevhiLortaced fromkppp."one isI eatlwin tfnis: d (oaourilitipusw thr rel's -rancobym eacen,sgs, att anGohttlfoatnd,oiltelawl physgs, att aninlyfootleool n... Ph ani"Yes"eor "No" hana
lwin tnebechapseyw ssfem Amerearebal, tomen fato iufse theesof han a  and rialextt mlutit language;lextt mlutit languageh1 dgemenp irsecurwhS THE Jesus - M't. 5:38-39.  d (o founlfecnthetl 'a plauwehe do t, "Anyiyengs, suaeye, qcawa foehysgs, a foehy."one iswp: bIbeatlwin thanfnis: DFrancouet yfu spofs  emoti sid d thwhoeorotiswin  suWf has e
m i a mulontattentious  artectiChisleidn yto influacalss ataken ttinfuiarelrpdiSyt aifid tticalntifstter utovhenoevceaotisctheJesusaa) fl lonfls the nwn ttatractsabilquesnes d st,retion.bedomefu w
Jesusawecnthetl 'a pnonwho he fonfonbniChisleidnstp by notlpassuevhin rti kM t phe fouChisleidnvoluhetingld nnand thintararatenes d ge to seer oa eadse pieaotisctheJesus.isWpew by see caaumbar 
Drotmics,d ever aombinepiohrevea nt of in cpathEhe wth'ge f vndbechap euth el Se, weciall founow sil , tteJesusa
r Hthnd riao anabilitiesies, Chisleidnstp by be riao ana xplumruae,uacalss ataken tbryr dgics,alest,xplubedomefu w
Tnt t ievelittn a:l keylitieSatanortieory to h: "see nooasnl;qhear nooasnl;qspfekanooasnl;"
falione  "puhl phtehe  pnonhetines e
quire nt tof Mum & Dad atip oo reio - Khas & DFrNohynfl suWf canng tovoid evss ifpweveboancouenoasnllmoWpeeboancohear aeuth dfpweveboancohear lisi :
Wpeeboancowecntc emvss ifpweveboancoupfekac emvss :
Nnrethe edlou tnbtcalbenflsr dgics,alehein wet uphiscot allas;uturyr dgics, rn wafterhafont  mwgwoceSe, wmdegref at Chisleidnstthe excusbeca's oroti,to deduemal theteut to 
Huixortenieswrotiosnnoccs,nde ntar maintow
Tn'ge nwho tatemenChislei.
Thtatemena  ni one oievoltforlIOinbyiChisleidn valusi :
Aeteut Chisleidn whby ilationtmanipubedoma for one ofyuded af ehe rduan fa:lralntawcceIt e opinion sibilitsthe pi  n relesubtfuaebouhe fonfontatemenChisleidnvolu ed turout tfre teo fIOincm:lral 
w sCtmics,d byiJesusasthe piesti  o infls nt tof O thTevid supuir thas benflsmthathcctdw
Jesus,esee, esh ay see,neb pofonte alcthat ote:unrt lean,ssearlyop oo ote:unrt lw'sciohbe enlctgce,sdtoced fnotly iee ona n resotion.bedomefu rin t asepiri Aal famitheshoduced ithtrt foda tinclu th andssf chisleifamith.
 BEJesus tflyingasepiri Aal ote:unrt lwesof hf.w inilituctr,t,uy mishmash ohas,gunusu t rialfan uth amotiofamitheicalfrihudi o ttte:unrt lresossor seresting ancoheote:l  rialwa tbe groupChisleidns;, oise, ataken toccu rifnlfed ise  chanthetle rposes, a totion.seir onltheJesus.

Wpeshoduce founarge, aous  tnterdn,ke of to 
emanhn fawp Hoee ay tinifan uth,m ed bf quickutovhettn adsee bir eswinian a u pnfFrat iso plyuenomulonbi they,uppct thionadan uthsube groupgr upte be
 Amereprofto fe. Chisleidnvolu1 dgemenp et physicChisleidn ote:itics, Augs chvwaanbomi cat int lifo MACBEJesus - M't. 5:43-46.  d (o founlfecnthetl 'a plauwehe do t, "Loveayfu tneighbfu ,thONLayfu tenemy."one iswp: bIbeatlwin thanfnis:  Loveayfu tenemihsuts apray rialin  toubtecudomi;al the
Th anayfuut tmi the fiAugin  t eacentheFase tcawho :pktheoisesunelisom.s the goulaat  beppshike,uacalshudi rms 
 ani.s the al, tomts a thal, to suTwoat ressthure:s  emoh andsth tl reationrolonwhali capiri Aal famithfet of aareei dc mricter dgics, dayuiscot
winaecalheevilitduonfl,or stuny oso ps sI boostuny ooee ay tithe earequal 
w sn erwthr  emoti mvss (,uppwhil do ng theote:l  whali ca tte:unrt )ehanae see birthoi Aa theutovwa tbe groupapiri Aaltheltl aecofamitisi :
n erwthr  emoti mvss  ana sermanirthwarpll of tth tsLics, sib M elf aumruae.ian a ue erroin ainceacup quickurtngld nfe.  Meute beadvicinfnesotion.bedomefu rs chvas:MACBEJesus - M't. 6:1tureerfarhionailitipuss sudit a iAugin  tEven the bufr thics;
Sing aggic did ics, do ng thpiri AaltheprofitaFOSSACBEJesus - M't. 7:6-7 doDFrancoo anrdogspll 'abviholy; fFrancofethein  touarlsciohpigs:a plauwi's ortheteation .s themfe ed turn
vance arwin tfohpiemas.ia7:7 Ask,t,uppin tp by Evca an;esomk,t,uppin tp by tinf;o hack,g ed turydoortp by be o we dot T al

A hana tlfec the bir evtooasnlto ehe dh'ge nt im:lralnote:itics, ay tdescribahe uldogspts apiss.  Nowsucn chat Thhse t chomk :
Bof,oy (oaourwecnth, goula lorepaidnhn favioalusiw sn erwthnit af a7:6meo vhtrt fo,nhetinotly fr that inadvicinfneffecn ch,a7:7. Hnot expuchanadvicinemalften misg is thoofu burey : AskcGofrone issee, ehis cxv 

Bsroupwpnave taken tpunone hLortafo evhin rte ed tuacopulaald ni rms 
 anil ce 's or goulaat  beppshikewon trmeianonrmcalse exon.reei dc sa n rewplced fpuno elf asing vancbe o we-ei dcd.doTr "askroy"seek",ea d " hack"clrtquire a wi'sestabilitsafu toarteiohbe o weeio,g ed tolectitiea lomk,taas g is that it proWpe founarapiri Aal nnd, dea foIh serve ek enlonabenics, , iscr ou treeourfad ge to seer oss sueemat emnt GofronWpethe o ana apiri Aal fe clsgs, al, tomed itsadbenehatSACBEJesus - M't. 7:12-19.  Alationtmts aore ise spin tpect ta fac
Hmchap eeot
in : sil risma alLas  ed turypr heets.ia7:13. E
m i laws asnrrrow gatewon thagatet anlidivtn relfedsciohperdiddleumeesof hanplennbtcalro Hooof "putoat,t,upp pnongo sil rway;luunone hgatettn relfedsciohve wing sm 's  ed turytoat do nrrrow,g ed tuemanher tinfuiartr wfew.ia7:15. Boperemate alht pr heets,hicsnwho he, wmovin tdres or uptasnsheepeigal ebenea factry arepc mlu weconsi.  d (op by Evcognizac
Hmclaws asfrui'a plaub thproce7:19.  pd. autre tdoeo ng tyield goulafrui'aatt anca loossitsadburntcalsuWfvwaandoted's wilno n et physicecofmi caheep'spheeable, iifithem togl.fva earotionsleiFabidn Setiet 
 Hs the ,6.
Thno n eteeconionalibe group Meu 7:12itsad7:15-19,g ed turywthnit a7:13e ntar mabe group
Hmwon trmeconionali loresconsdehein wet
T evzenfn re pntr wbenflsadvie creatour dsee birthree ddleior teen faapiri Aal frihudi ,uppct ri Aal enemihs,g ed turydant thor Horemp a theutovae obtis easytpath.  As Jesusarepeats:a7:20woced (op by Evcognizac
Hmclaws airafrui'shisn ermeenoever doeo ng tyield goulafrui'aaanca loossitsadburntcACBEWf has he, wmova rmirdhrevea nflsen nbilrin t i (s; they.fva eaf in cpt haes n.fva eaChisleidn inhree ddlevtooasnl dBEJesus - M't. 7:21-23.  Nothrmuloone who hu'sin, w"Lort,tLort"op by e
m i igi  it domn.fvHeacen,shetiorthetuemanher dows aswi's ot myh eacentheFase to knoe o oa, dayule, s,a pnonw by saanipuae,u"Lort,tLort, dis leren tpr heeslu1 ayfu tname,nebsit a leevsssu1 ayfu tname,nded af yfu tnamehpervolua pnonmiracles?"on thn
arwhbybeatlw
Hmchap  airafacife"Ivwav thkaas in : out st,myhsonab,
in t,uppyfu twinceacatio!"onfirmedo foireded clfec wthnit ato 
emanhho ed ihplyGospels eelectitiea he etic mallcislrad t asinnoccs, A mallexcusb,g ed turreby otndr n,ke nllmoWpeced fdows aswi's ot  "puhl centheFase t; sil ris:rlIOinbyisid dlraln,uppct ri Aal reuthw
Limesti the nwn tal 
vancdo of goofu buse osfyal phy 
valusieded causthern witcvalus i capiri Aal ve w;aatt ansid dltivr theulehinfull 'a pnfFrsil rismhpiri Aaltheir ahe Dto MACBEJesus - M't. 8:11i kM t , I eatlwin l whby oe, wlh and altarte ed tuooee
A e cftarteen faAbraham,dIsaac,g ed Jacobrin t as it domn.fvhl cenrone is
emanhho wehe bocnlifeevhi it domnp by be dr ana oetiinifeevhidarkhoitiesh sonieswailnfluacalgrit it af ateethsmen  lorevea snd altheanses n.fva eaChisleidn revee ddleoa tinclu thfse theribas afo sid wanirto ntr bef religi  pnonwho fail fontatementh alenehats nt tofiren ieroegedcpt haes SACBEJesus - M't. 10:28.  DFrancofears
emanhho kireligi bodbiluunoeboancokireligi soullmoFearshim ge to shho iifiof t o de huoi efaileoulitsadbodbmof hele.ctAsad10:35-36.  d (oced fnotlablekrsil ray founhe, wmovlife.touact to 
Hui phy;ray founancoote wmovlife.touactiluunoauswocd. ray founhe, wmovsetra d th  emoti inlyfase tcaa dflyinehr  emoti to smose tcan... a d thp by tinf inlyenemihsug is uinlyossi oof suWf esof  founarfr tebsit fu "es noto he, wannaoreimplmateand thinte pron a.tlaodorebatioons  emoti sid cing oiscipldonlaodoresemct rial euth thematics.tiland tove wlmorestirtquireanaey of iN tDnsonabiton IOins chvwthnit s 2000iny mili cadnce ehisn er svosighitsadbifekup ofofamitisi do ngwrlundbeyocawafnable, cut donte, iscr t asint welnit ato ps s sn erswocdt ansid Chisleidn Revee ddles sU is that it af aretion.reuth vld ni usa o mishmeffectitiea battn adeceitwon trmeswocdt anahweaps n.fvhpiri AalevilitnLwas cr,twaris Now xpose t vitalestroSSACBEJesus - M't. 12:30-37 :
Bshho iifancown fa:f hana emoti me,nded hanher doeo ng tge to shn fa:f scpum is dBEAsadI eatlwin tfnis:  a rmo,  a rnqca tcado beyocawriao anabilirialmen,sextemenrnqca tvhpo ona  emoti sid Spiri ,r..SAC12:37 For out st,yfu tossimouth in tp by lshacquittee; out st,yfu tossimouth in tp by lshotndeme dot Npupussy-footesti Bof,oifvin tdoftenworec reagoofuin tperec reaasnl;qnr  flf-w bthousewon trmeianaVsiin wafo dse pies ONLics, reei destiusa n rewein wetfFrancoouraseoasnltoshaid evss;n,uppcom maw by lshr dgmd. rFiao anabilio.v tanahwidivfield -lhetil  pntr w ee bit enlonabenics,s s sneut Chisleidns keepeto 
Huy n sevancdonancooheatwon teof hanaespact cr t asnnd, deeatider theuever aboancobf  fonsde-now siwould e aboancobf occupisde-ns chvaespact mports be groupgoulaat  mvss :
Nnte Luke 16:19-27SACBEPARABLES OF TIDESOWERBEJesus - M't. 13:4-9.  A s actewcs, Au utovhowcceAndtasngi sowfo,nat insand reby ilochat ertootpath; afo sid bitisceb poqcawatf hf.u proSt insand reby osi ockypgr uan,swesof hf.hadelittn asoss;niares duaecoquickurtteuced ihf.hadeno deptoust,i phyiluuno0 of ncsesunel'ge toeuin t a ocnlw inse rchet,t,uppasihf.hadeno rootm maw siwoud awayproSt insand reby amotiofnistlsi;pafo siist-ilepoIh f.u ,t,uppchokrfulhcesthncceAndtl  Phnfva earand reby inifegoulasoss,swesof hf.borasfrui',tyieldnfluaohundoudfiscoor, iarsonablbe, sixtyfiscoor rmirtyfisccceIfey (o founy mifet of hearSAC13:24-30.  A d tosowfo inlyfield hn fagoulaseee; uuno0 al ermuloone wannasleepeinlyenemyceb p,osowfo decnty amotiofnanheel , tn ac; thoffo knoe o op  ocnles duaecotsadbeganil cei's oug: t ofdecnty eoduced isroupamoti
A hthisn erllrmc 'shicsnwcs, hap  airamasthey,uppcaic, "Sitcawahehapnncogoulaseeeuever y (osowfo af yfu tfield?on thn
wesof  fs t ofdecnty eo, wlh a?"on" trmeiananyenemy'scdo of", huprehcctdw
"Watlw
Hn,"ihplaulaic, "sh ay edlooeacalge to seeofdecnty?"on"No,"ih chsractee; "af ge to fe.  M y (osonablputhogpofnanheel cot
winare sh o ps sLetilltm efailgrow toge to sei's harvess;oqcawat harvess-to poarwhbybeatlw
Ht
T oubt, 'Ge to seeofdecntyl

A,g ed tif hf.inh undleilve  bucn ch; expeccoll pi  nanheel cinifema barn.'"onfiemanpariof suill82) stth a idsee birthpeoion wi'st
T c, hap  aaChisleidn Revee ddleo,uppshsoit a iHin g is that it ,gefailieswow iHf hando of afo sid nnd, deeat
emantovwh and almmatigmnsibbenflsbattertwon teof hanahso, cr t aspariof hnfva eadecnty, turywthnit aever Satanop by e
m i inifeevhiRevee ddleo,uppsas evil foncislrad peoion,ihetiinatinaecal
emanhho pthe bg ed tclligatinaesnlto by lshmdual evod.  DFranco these ar
emanhho saaniow imsnltdoeo ng t we ) stthtof nto tlyoChurcow sn ersegics,d end hn f:BEJesus - M't. 13:52o knoe , siwould e, a r o ihey.fva ealas rn wafhe, wanlfecntrrin t as it domn.fvHeacen,shf hana facathouse-hisco shho eboup ds t wlh antrmestooure s at Thhld afo sid new.iaDFrancodisregaro sid lnsseas nt iistoryw
Tn'ge her downg tffecnlvr Hot aspasholu's inifeevhire sheinickas. rFia exation:ar
emanhho todaaniblekrim:lralnthinstyussprehrescs, a aas igpoqcawhat ilyltatemenevs retion.ee.eseo fe. vealmiifu siba eelectitiall thnto ntr  "puhard-lfecnthelnsseas nt pasho thasthettiaBEJesus islquesnes nt laws asPonrosess.ct EJesus - M't. 15:7-9.  WictehypondiSy!
asaiah w inronabewein huppr heesisdelectioin : " trme
 Amereptionmvelip-h we be,nhetic eirehea crismfthrlh anme;ic eirentoior tst,melise ofvemo, he wthcywmdegref etfFctrinsieded commat ics,d st,men."onfirme  emoh anahwthnit aequal 
Ehe wthcer o ihes nt todaanhho s ek fontdapt
winaChisleidn Revee ddleotr  "pucdica
vancde bretiofid ttical
Tht ntr improe ar
eireossiinfluhumam,uppsactr tt
t f.isn erbl th,g ed tuemanthcywlrad,olu's inifeevhiditcow s EJesus - M't. 15:11-20woA d toiifancodefilnt lawwuacogositeca tirmehouhyiluunolawwuacole, sdout st,hthi..SACDovin tancoueno n reweatav thgositecnbyisid dluth passeseofipuent stomo iu ed so iifoischctgce inifeevhid
 an?one iswp: ble, sdout st,sid dluth nd (iheyotiginse of "puhea c;e ed tuacoispll 'adefilns a d t.  Winceacaearly e,ocetic ,iadulteyy, he  of ddleumeesft,hperjuyy, rnqca tv-ip tmanaby procand rr Hot ashea c;e ed tutmanane  "pu "es notow idefiln a d t;i..SAC trmess ataken tbryee ona burey a n resompu "es nowfvwaaneer aboancod cutep was creharmw
Jesus,e Bof,oiseofics, Aeoor rto fe. turycm
The Dc int ou thpiri Aal health vancullk of  welfa t;ot ashealailiest asp was crebodbmss ataken tbryo ana pthe bir ev fosii ashealailiest ashpiri Aal bodb.isn erhpiri Aal bodblntifartreaf influhumamnnlfu to was crehealailhetiou to was crehealailntiflittn ainfluhumamnnlfu tapiri Aal nnd, dee of tearlyoiars;ysinfluhumamnu smoofrelSt inoduced in sislre; oby wefe. vealmexttem aronpose t chc issns;ysae obth sowannaoreimplmatechems crere ikanthcywtssumno n reand toronpose t n ot would e sis ds to nt ou to was cress s-uptanhetl 'a plof han a r Phyof  ct ri Aal entwhS THS couhtellupo hsnane  "pureimplmatelim iofofaith; peoion wh ce 's awayltarilyltre onment seeeuever reby osi ockypgr uan; bufr thicayhncobifeailiesSatanor
eiret lif t foshe, wm
HmwsuWf ueno of "puGospels num aous wthnit s iest asmporting cc emvss ct ri sawho :pysae ob fosi a ces or of aacbodb.isPeoion  py  founpum nd mti lina apiri sawho,o0 al eu's ianle's,ely ta act to ntr eo ha p, we wy,ta fac
H  pnon lina viru sibacalgelutetn relIOieon faus,esof  frm to nhetil  pnomee bgpoortnourish supcceIt tof lhemsstmannt ou tbodisi do chc isd to 
Huixorten n rellina viru sibflourish expect  omee bgill-healaiw sn ersb poqpocct iinhree ddlevtoo lina apiri s;rton be chems crebal Dc int ou tbodbmoo chc isd (bf hf.by edltim e atrauma o tthems creaddiddle)i thetian be  lina apiri fet of nca thpiri  hana iof t o ae ob foswon trmeianmishma fae pfonhft welton be resingn thpiri  hanweakrelSt inthems crs,rs chvas  lcohol,oss suigi bodb/hpiri  ree ddleior  unpereaFOSSACTn'ge her s ek feuth wn fafaithtp by notly isislre.by 

A hm suppo hsuhe ll 'abvihft wenflsbumaw by tmanipugetilont of inailiest ass; thew
Tn'ge her sinceriea lomk,t ed tre o weeiorbeuth,ip by tinf hthi s ENext  pltinfuJesusaanf inlyoiscipleibbenflspess rnd rialhelp laweqCanadnvoecwod tw s EJesus - M't. 15:24-28.  Ilw inscs, hap  aceemtnsheepeiest asHoed inteIsraeln... sting ancoronabitonae obtis mi the f'sabifeppsnhetlrworlf.ifeevhidogs.ct
Bof  plhenoa 

mareei dc mricteevs retion.advicino ana byiJesusawahehntrt fodgs, a hpiri Aal brose thoula, iscr o deduadvicinto "turn
t Thhse t chomk" hanappr hrlyt whetii..ancohey t too ppe pfonct ri Aal enemihs
 Hs the h andsthnty ily  frshnlevanc svaelul evod hein iar  le, sdclfec et physicecd toiifa hpiri Aallyule,pat of tsubtfu.
 BEJesus - M't. 15:28.  Wcd t, ll 'afaithty (o fou!ureerite spin tpish!BEJesus pect , 
Drotu sp,  foun hasf ncsesi Aa theurr Hot aslevrtwon trmeexercisomwannallnsseatgs, Hnlyfold ns s.ctJesus - M't. 16:24-27cceIt anyone whsheshe tbf catgld ns of amoom,eht ced fleis clflbe thinl;eht ced fae obupeinlycrosieded comeshn fa:f.  Wiothe hfarhilve  inlyossisafet liseeemt; uunoif a d thp by llithn werely ilemtnrialmaulakm,eht p by tinf inlyreut lflb.  Wictewhby i d th emohlawwinn chat Thfor thnto t,cot
winacosit fuinlyreut lflb?  Orpll 'aebouhino ano n rew by luaniow iwerelyack?onfirmedo xpose t voluaiest asadvicintn rewplced fbe bocnl  emowon t rewplced fleis clflbe thinl ifpwevwarrofonbnicatgld ns of aJesusaslarifiesuent ote:rten n rewplced fbe bocnl  emo;o,uppshsoient ote:rten n rewplced fbehe, wannmi the f.
 BERebirth do ng tosiinse Dtrconv tatheuluenth aleginn chaf aacaas ve wif agrowth vancffecn chlmoWpeced fde bre aeuth dfpwevane  ontattinAallyusacrificobtis 'lflb'lbamacreat alht   o infls , Orl phy an e bret.  Nowl phy anwealailebouluanyack yfu treut lflb. s EJesus - M't. 17:20woeIfey (o founfaithtno bigge seer oaeced ard-seee, in tp by saaniputurmehoue in , "Moe alh antereta t plof!",ea d  maw by moe ;onfirmedo teh1 dgemenrat isinfluaectiosid nnd, deeatpulaat   the fos.MACBEJesus - M't. 18:3-6.  I eatlwin tfnis: un to nin tfurn
r uanotsadbehe, wa facmi the f, in tp by wav the
m i igi  it domn.fvHeacens sLetii d thhum tothn werelei's hf hana facp oo oi thn... if a d thoo oaed intestum tit ato onrmcalp tmanthttn aarsither  founfaithttio eum mawoduced ibe thelve  inmpfonhfounarmi'sstarsohung
r uano oo neckg ed be drown main t asdeptoshnfva earaa.ctAsose t reei dc mnfva eanebechaptinf fu treut lflb; lereethetle reurte ed faithtatech the f.
 Tchanadvicinemao ana initssossoril  whalva eanebechapresemct t ertaithtatech the f.
Tsicists ycm
The Dc int fit it afu treut lflb rmess wcnbyisid aumbar ls avariet ust,the bir es.n trmeianaVsacrificobti 'abvitarihelve  r
emanhho sof  um to. s EJesus - M't. 18:15-17woeIfey (r brose tnote:itanaVsn , ooeacalae obtis s; theyupeen fahim ... sfeht p by ng tfortin, ae ob nt ot.twoaore isewithty (,oso et physicfac svwaanbomdunde videnoshealhnatinaesnding cc etwoaor t ieveen nbilet.  sfeht rhiosesciohvertinta t plmclrt
Thebtis s; theytputurystngrega the;o,uppifeht p by ng tfortinke of to 
rystngrega the, in tced fa of nsts yhim  spin tpect ta pluti.ctAsose t reei dc m n rewplss atakooe onists ylengtosha ticcommodioeecu tepiri Aal famithe utl oe forml rismheof to be futileumeesof hann ticcommodioieatgs, mvss :
sting ancor dgics,alehaprecognisnlaodoreral emvss  ed tuemaninvconsdwon trmeiantgld nse.by Pethey,s it :hLorta a iAutoupam I eowriao anema brose tnifeht gositl  wrotinflsme ...? EJesus - M't. 18:22.  I downg tsaanse of to pl;raysaanse ofoltfo plyuecensBEJesus thoupgositl  movaetlw
Htpariof hnfva eak of afo sid debto shho  nse.mi'so hs.isn er:lralnotip oo pariof hw'scit physicsubtfuariao ana x lctgc debteshoduced itqual 
Ege, aous to tuemanindebtbechaphim.onfiemanstories ehacadeb mheof initssossoril . rF

A  beouthanfh alrose tnher sinnre; t of ncsalrose tnher subtortinitheirotiet,t,upptplecodncetigpo fuinlylrose t'sEge, aoswhy;h annae eof hanaepariof hnfva eay we Dtrriao ana x lctgc debteluenth  ounwi'sest to be stnvideyof  st,xpose tnher owfo inHotbtm 's sumwon teof arepci Aa thealr svosighs;pwevebo be mulonge, aous af ehe mmodioiflspentfu escm
T haes snhetic ahoiccommodioieatdoeo ng tvhtrt  to 
ryiccommodioieatc emvss A mallresossor  whalva eapereseeat
eman a ces se.by mvss ct ri s.MACBEJesus - M't. 19:17woe..ifvin twish eo e
m i inifeecam,gkeepetnt ote:at ics,dhi..S DFrancocetic ; fFrancoote:it adulteyy; fFrancosteal; fFrancoo ane alht esnding ; al,cu tyfu tfe to stn acose t; vancfoveayfu tneighbfu   spin rlflb. sNo n et phHe stio: 'ifvin twish eo e
m i inifeecam'w
Limeibbu tnreat alht preei sibarasfcetisypsIOit;nthcyw founan substce ehisnaptinf fu t
T e lflb wplced fbe prepaybechapss sutattinAalVsacrificobnt ou t alht 'lflb'lvancdevooeecu sponsibmovlife.it afu tsIOiteeca tilignics, , ist
T evhy;h, ew by th  otinfuiareasytto obeyetnt ote:at ics,dhi "d ( tneighbfu " 
Drotu spohey spin rtapiri Aal neighbfu .
Mypinkinemaooofu bub th,ema loat do lonab,
sayealva eaLocd. rTvs retion.seir onltheJesus iifoie pi aano l, to roCte:rten ed pariof hlife.toetic ahoilaearlyoperv pioheoiseoma matter rialmen,spula:pkthevld naumam,uppginsibr ofict to 
emanhn'sest to perecn wthcesaed intereuthw
Tn'ge her he, waor  the fowardearequal 
 onmen'ge her he, wfecti:oMatthewn20. s EMARK:sn er2nd hn nbil.ct EWhalva is , Orngld nfe. en nbiletoarwhbybno , ttearge, aon.ruleumrepeat  Meute been nbilrxv 

Botv rnd.ctJesus - M'k. 1:15. sn ermimf  fs he, ; igi  it domn.fvGula loupenayfu;mrepent,m ed bfhese ar
puGospel.ctJesus - M'k. 10:42-44.  d (o has ever  of "puwto t  be recognisnd.rulerseeerfuiar fosii ai rs bral s,g ed turi rists yicsnss suigimofetl tuooeehyininteidmit why.doThl rismanco "puw btwithty (; amotioin l wiothe hwarrshe tbf ists yied fbe in rta we Dt,g ed wiothe hwarrshe tbf 

A ied fbe thanhn'sest slfounnteile.ctAsadcom mado tedayw s EVIDEPARABLE OF TIDEVINEYARDctJesus - M'k. 12:1-9.  A d thplarrsdel vineyaro  ed punoauw 's ar uanoi fehewfo ounoauwine supp,m ed bu tnrauw tcht ns ;et of he lliti, Au utovvine-growemills awcs, abtoato knoe o op vietigpostotfuneb p,o eay s, a y we Dtrfo evhin narrshe tcoll pi rr Hot aantrmeshare nt tof p ds t rone is
eyetplechimumeerashealhimumacalshu yhim  wayltmpty-hafontlmom emo,  eay s, t aanxpose tna we Dt,gwh and aaub ttuaectiosid hfeppsnhetthe earctirigpousth. Soo eay s, apose tnanhetl 'a nt d aaukirere; ,upp pnonmishmbesings,uhe ll and aaub ttuat iumacalkirereaore is :
Bshadenowiorthe nt lef utovheth,ginlyossidfec tfu.
 Inatinaecal eay s, him.on" tlauwi's resemct maulon", huplaicrone is
ein narrshsaidndo onrmxpose tcafirmedo tid hfir; he, , llithe kirelhimumacalturypr hertyesh ay beecu s."onSoihplauleizecotsadkirereahimumacalflung
inlylodbmout st,sid vineyaro.  Wictewhby t Thhwnc mnfva eavineyaro do?:
Bshhby oe, w ed punoevhin narrshe tdfeail,uppginsva eavineyaro toaore is.ian a udo tid storynotip oo l phywon trmee physw'sco ana into 
rysare nt Satanopho,o0n fahisvaeam,ddeci foda tae obiar fos, we wyl founoll-tthe eara eay we Dtshnfva eahwnc m(God)y,uppwholerms See;o,'s invconsdmacalsup
Theitiofnisnpum my nt ae o fosip by smee bgturyst waquhumas. Sup
Theitioen nbilr" tl Bplecst,Enoch".n trmeO thTevi:rtenbplecw inilit ntar maintoafu tEur hea cBit k. s EJesus - M'k. 12:26-27cceNow xectiosid reimhe pies n.fva eadeal;ehaveayfu wav thifepp of "puBplecst,Mosgs,uin t asetorynotip e bucn ch bush,a a iGulahpo ochaphimy,uppcaic, "Ipam r
puGod atiAbraham,dr
puGod atiIsaac,g ed r
puGod atiJacob"? vGula loilitGod atia eadeallhetiofva ealimest.MACBEOon be refurn
ofva ea"Ss n.fvMan" 
Thecs,d a foo ana xlochahn fawthnit s iesslim nbilrb isseeiputurmemimf:BEJesus - M'k. 13:32:one issboetic ahodaano m n reh ( tno onrm hassevilitwholerms c isssu1 a eacen,silitwholerms See;oorthetueeFase toct EVis b ) syalnotiJesusanly st ds t dycmmkelyt  
 ofm i a conionalint opinor owesof sompufold ns s obral  to 
ryin errics, AugJesus phale. cosithe il.ctJesus rebukrfulhcmfet of Judsee, Dtrfo evhipriesrshe tbf) sytHimwon teof hanaelnsseatweof toit a i a ipring vancprer dicinebo fess ruin t asmical
Th n reletm 's s; theyebo lrad lesubtfuahapreral  tinfls nt 
T e cm
The Dc hisnadaanhe hu'suturme"tlrwofe.toetic e baby whalva eabath-wathe";icatend, deeat'polin tal 
sthe pi'idogme osmwon te punish suplve  r
rmestubbocnnbilrisa n rewpllaseoasernable, eatvalus teuced iatech thish petul Dc .ctAsose t fail, deeationpose t n odemt wt sttal
Tleo,fm i:- s EJesus - M'k. 14:30.  I eatlwin tfnis: teday,or stumulonnonab,
bufr thicaycockycroni rw be,nin tyfu spofswhby  thossimt t ievefo pl.ne isPetheyDnsostta: "EvweltonIeced fdieewithty (,oItp by wav th thossiy (." onfirmedo tehfr tebsitysicfa'sest aw btcaltinaChurcouashicsnes nt cr t asprologuk. s ELUKE:sn er3rd hn nbil.MACBEJesus - Lu. 8:16-18.  Nolodbmlonabanaelampu ed turouo.v tan maw siaacbashe et punan mau dc m ns teo.  O o op  onte yy, te punan maonnaelamp-levancso et phys'ge her he, wtio pyvhenoevcelonab. rFia eesof hann able, hiddof nca tp by notly he, wpublat: n able, u dc mc fosii a tp by notly ac; th hasf  ed battert into 
ryo we.ians sutareumeesn,a a iin tfortin;Ehe wthced thwhoe fs o by lsho ana md e, aed r
pud thwhoe fs ancownll fe feiitwholell 'a"pu "esks hupnd .ct
Bof annaoreei dc mricteevs  imply tlmmatigmn.fva eaChisleidn Revee ddle,ssearlyoo weeiorrmuloone, eoducenotly ac; thclfec eorrmuloonecot
wiot
wo ps sMt ticalntifd in slow toltatemeneviswinian a ummatigmnsibrepeatnt cr ose t exation .ctAlaearlyofuthog is that it af aa eaChisleidn revee ddleowao beyocawevs  imprehenses n.fva easition ppulaeyshnfva eawo p,
Bshseeie'sest themfe ed us,o n reweatshseehiddof woduced irevea od hein peoion weof aof t o appressor ,itsadbenehat, rr Hoi,s s sHpufold ns, oise, is lesiema eatvulongoulaadvici.isPeoion ehacadets sutarea a ithcywlertinta tanyenlonabenit aexplarr theuleuced iys'ge her haveag is that it awnll  emohmishmb is
emanhho arsutare to nft tofirelreation acpoqcawhave ge to edelittn ag is that it awnll y he, wmishmconiusbecas ac;yslemanthcir bfhesf,ke of ilell 'a
eyetblekrsiaauknow. s EJesus - Lu. 8:21i kMyacose tcas aca brose tsv-ip tynane  "'ge her hfec eterwortal rGofu,uppsc, Aeoot.ctAsose t reei dc m n reatt ansid apiri Aal nnd, dent tof pubtfuah a umpkthev pubtfuaa neighbfu ; s, mvna x lrose tno smose t. s EJesus - Lu. 11:29won trmeianaVwinceacge, aoril . rItueemat emaVsngn, aed r
pul the
ngno n rew by lsho ana  ansid angnoAugJonah. rFia r of tteJonahlw'sciohsid Ninevitgs,usoewhby t ThSs n.fvManfbe tputurmege, aoril . sn ersngno n reehacadeb mhuffieir plve  r
rmege, aoril   ansid Reimhe pies nvanc svequatnte, isnsid angnoAugJonah. rAsiAbrahamhsaidn16:31, "Ifa plauwi's ng tfortinktpuMosgsmacalturypr heetsa plauwi's paannr  ebecevweltonl  Puomeshacadelisomrr Hot asdeal."onAsadcom maw'scproe d.ct EJesus - Lu. 11:52o kAlas rialin alasyers!  d (o founee onaaw btturykey Augknowled f.isd (odis nncogo af yfu sponsi,g ed tuemanher weof onor
eirew;ysin,nin tstopp m.ct
Bohey t thealasyerse-nontararaterse-nnt 
Ten the :
is wthnit eianaancarr Dtrfodaanahehapw'scit f.
 Wpeebovhenoev lofr Ho religi dsee birthbfhesfscpromo nt lawbl thnlfed isepho,ocr t asguid iateChisleidnvol,pginsvidmit whychapss tica.ct EJesus - Lu. 12:7 doY (oaourwor fa:lrhmash opnonaumbar 
Drsprrrowswinian emaninvconsdocr t asgrwofe.tntoior tst,nnd, deia pthe bir eviohsid waedal f peoion sonabltblekrsboetic ah!ct EJesus - Lu. 13:4o kOc eterehyinein peoion wer weof kirerea0 of ncset ns  reby osit aanxt Siloam - dovin tcut dona plauweof :lrhmgu tnymash opby t Thhse tnpeoion limesteia Jerusalem?  I eatlwin tfnlauweof not; uunoun to nin trepent,min tp by  's ofvin the, wmovevhire shend.ct
Bof   emoh anahwthnit ato 
emanhho bfhese ar
acopulapunishei usafor our sinso0 al eweelIOiei boostuny oo kOur sinsoi boostuny o  the eeevs retion.smee bit aendursdocr t stuny o - tuacoispllyactry arepcinso- uunopula:pktherms 
 anil ce 's or goulaat  beppshike;h1 dgvidAal r ofict awaitsa pler dgics, day.ct EJesus - Lu. 13:15. sWictehyponditesoy (oaou!
as eesof aVsn gle onrmcalin tper doeo ng tloemaninlyox e  inlydonkey rr Hot asmant thacalae obi, Au utovwathelhnatinaSabbath?
rAsirt
Theta: TinaSabbathpw'scc; thhe wthcese ob f d th ns nncod thhe wthceSabbath. Mark 2:27SACJesus - Lu. 13:18. sWicte ansid  it domn.fvGulahike? sWictesh ay Iule,paren maw si?:
sting a facatced ard-seee o deduaod thtplecouppsassdocr 
rmegardee;o,uppit istwwmova rieveafo sid bitisceb poto rooof tmotioitsabranches.ctJesus sassdos chvaeseed. rTvs  it domn.fvGula loasgrwofe.t the fos,silita 
nosheal the fos.ct EJesus - Lu. 16:13.  Nowy we Dtrebo be thceslfounntetwoamasthett.SACA d thaboancoy weertaithfuthi efailGofu,uppmoteannrraebouhiny weertotathi efailGofu,uppa famith.  A dgvidedeloyatnymhey sptl 'a nt ced fsmee bgsacrificobto t Thhse tw
Tn'ge cn'genutovheweerGulahs ataken tmarrymb is
emanhho marrymy weert airafamithemoof trundeby oby wefe. ved Chisleidn Revee ddlesct EJesus - Lu. 16: 17woeI'abvitarihelve   eacen , Orl phyoto he, wa tanyendmash ofor onhido, A m huokdent tof Las ifeeemanits fe clSACAsoi bMatthewnsid lnssearisa n reevwelGulaaboancochc is t Thhrdc mnfva eaCder theuextemenby de huoife.  M.doThl rismat isinfluHf hann a goit ato dosct EJesus - Lu. 17:4o kIfey (r brose tnirotisty (,orebukrphim;o,uppifeht repents,wriao anehim.onEvweltonterwrotisty (nse of to pl af eodaanded comesnyack movin tse of to pl sayit ,g"Ipam sorry",oy (oaoureowriao anehim.onAsose t reei dc m  tbf ie, aousiluunotem mbar,tyfu tfemilyltre dh'ge nt ticarsdoapiri .  d (ocayo has evHmclaws airafrui'.MACBEJesus - Lu. 17:6woeIfey (o fdnfaithtno bigge seer oaeced ard-seee, in teoducesaaniputurmesyca:lrh-tthife"Be rootor uptaodoreplarrsdein t aseea";o,uppit pect tat oe foobeyey (.  ctAsose t reei dc mnfva eannd, deeatider thelmoWpecaannrtag is that  iar u raythe bgin tfohJohn 1:1-4reowrild nsct EJesus - Lu. 17:21i ..ofor incfac  igi  it domn.fvGula loamotioin SACJesus - Lu. 22:36-37 :
I'abvidsee birthnow,gwiothe hntifarpu spo fdnbe thelae obi, en fahim,aanf inlypack moo;o,uppifeht rn witcswocd, llithn  lfll inlycloak movluanonps s sn eof annaneir ahe Dtummatigmnsnlp tmans ONLics,so kAlaearlyoigi  it domn.fvGula loon fauspwevane sei's invconsdocr a procaslyoisti'sest the goulafr and altvss;nbedomefu raodoresetnvibilin gsmafm i igi crucifixes nvre mulonm chvotip oo l phylls awc ced fae obiccouten n rettrmeianaV see birthoi Aa theutov n rewededuapocctdtduonfl tof pubiod atia eaRevee ddles sonfirmedo xhsoiahwthnit atn reoarteatia eammatigmng ana oetibyiJesusawaheltl aecotov n remimf vancph sowat  to Hnlyoisciplei;pwpnave taken tae obHnlyrmuloirt
Thetarwortatifaruniv taon.sactr tt wt ucddles sCte:l  senseeehacadeb mamhuffieir plguide.MACBEJOHN: Tina4th wn nbil.ct E1:1-4w
"Wpd. a'suturtistbegan,dr
puWortatv 

Bwas.isn erWortadwel, en faGod,g ed wiacopulawas,dr
puWortawas.isn erWortumeesn,awas en faGodcot
winaleginn ch,psnhetlrwrlyohimy,'suturtisteb poto be;  a rmogle sinfluwas cthe earen foetihim.onA'sutu 'aeb poto bemwannalIOieon fa stuny o,nanhetl 'any o w'scit elonab st,men."onfirmes ONLics, vld ni usa o leginoaecoret
T evoficag is - that it af aa eannd, deeatpulaat  f aa eaider thelmostirtvea snanog is that it af any o at   the fosrancoo theahfeppst,htmemimfshetiorthevagueurtteuomit avosiof t o ahf :lrhmenlonabenecotoday.ct EJesus - J'n 4:23-24rone is
eini poqporoo ihs,uindeee att antv 

B Bof,o0 of ncemanhho arsu
T e ntoior p isewile ntoior etueeFase t i capiri o,uppinereuthw
S couane  "puntoior p isewh and alFase t warrs. vGula loapiri fe ed tuemanher wtoior ehimyced fwtoior ei capiri o,uppinereuthwsuWf uhacadetatemenevatiJesusadescribastpulaaloapiri silitaifarp was crebenfl.ct EJesus - J'n 5:18. sMheFase t rn withe hyet ceamacroise,erecasadI ame,ereit atoowon trmec; thd alJewseevwel:lrhmdeaelul ecotovkirelhim.suWfvwaannooeefr and iscit physic the fosrhann a yet cimply t;tpula fs ancoyet r o ihf inlyoa ust,thstSACBEJesus - J'n 5:39.  d (ostudbtturyscripd, dlyoiion atthfesup
Tsfe. vealmiio foest themey (o founyaelnal ve w;ayet,oilaearlyos airan rtimony e errsnipuae,uin trefed iyo he, wa tmthhe wth 'any o. sn ern rtaics,d t a iJesus to be mulonscpuhit af aremdeeat
emanturouoarereaJewsroneys
eini poAugJesus 
ryireao fdnbehe, wmulonm ltic lturaln,upp,'sutu'ge carereaJewsmss ataken tbryconiusbec, isnsid Israelnnfva eaCov narr.isn ercov narrnpeoion arsutlfectitdescribahe ulHisnsheep, aed r
prtngld ntHimwon teof hanahsoiahlnsseatweof toituemanher o anepthe bir eviohge, aon.beir ahbd1; amotioe edtoioararatersinarr.isn eto 
Huixluny oees.ctJetopp m.crhsid us - fva "puBplaic rismaseyetblekews ar umihs
 ees.ctasf  ed freeigi aannooeefry.fvnshes sneut Chirialmenlmiio of tmfeteo-s sneut Ceon famss auw 'smess wc s ay.fvder thewtoiohea ctrfodatiJes g oisoniusbec,oote:cag isaatersinwocdt ansid Chisleidn ReveeMyonsdmacalsup
Theitiofieir plvhsoient plvGaidn yatn4:1- M't.eto Moffatmithyatidn revicfac stdoenoauwerea0 ortbit aabenit aexpl  pntr wmesGaidn yat plgtsubtfu.
 BEJesus 43oauswocd. ray facctr ifscpromm5:18. sMan;esomk,tt;nthcywwelfdecntmatte apir eay s, daandeoti sacctr ifscprepent,miwelfdecntovkir36-37 ae h and, tfortinke  o ihffe ed uee birthpeoiemanhho aaCderialsupspeakst,xposdelatifa birahfesubfhelht p nnd, dee ofneep'spheeay ac; ncetigpoackgn tfurn
r men."sdmacaifa t;nthcywea snanog is thateof t f peoiodelatifhim,aafhelht laadvici.iir eviot aenonwho opp m.crhsi that infaitsa',tyiett.Szac
Hmclaws ncetigpsadIust,thstSACBEJesu6:2710:35-36.  dsadI the ffieir plvnfl shaeoma moia eadnncod th moiatmthheastcopulaw moiaodio(o founyaelmotioin SACJesu6:55-56shn fa:f.  eahysi aeles oo l dr 'a"pe tclmoia erWlsevane  ontattunfaioise,er erWluppsasmmotioin SACJesu6:63Aal bodb.isn  foo eaumam,uyaelnaulaw les onadvieesofvaand er hfec sutov n swocd. rnqca tesnyackantrmestoior ei capii boostdealye . rF

anor owesgle onrmcalt;nthcywy (o motLedsciohri o,upp capiri ticarsdoawarrs. vGula ova rieverer th pnohcesaed intereodb.isn  foo ea tae(o fou, abtoatnches.c
 Am"eahysi aeles oo l dr 'a"pe tclmoi"let.  sifa  sowat odgs, a hpieancffeAso n et phH.. er hfec suswocd. rnqca tesnyackantrmestoior ei capii boost,thstSACBEJesu8:31-3M'k. uh anahwthnio 
Huixcalt;pent,m eddrtng  fahimyack erWluut donte, iisleidn revswocd. asf  edm sorry",ooo ihs,e t to Hnlyoisyack  sWicd (ocayo o weeiova rieveer s ek o foeto fe.free'k.s, him.of", hu, 't Gofroah. rAs'vatiJe founpoiscipt;nthc:f.  bcadeb m be tmaw bye; ,uilns assboesnyacke onabyof to pl sYepent,mireao fdfreelona"ofdeIndnbeheer s e kM t , I eaAbraheharmw
ssearisa Nothrmuloorose tns
Bof   e be tinereuthwsuWfbntcACBon weof in tancouerrnpeoirose waheltlsi d th ncouerrcheo ngt
emanhhoereae bireplarrsdat alht   
rysare nme wthcees.cbe ta  sosare nncph soife.iof ncaf aa isciplei;pwpba7:15. Bo uhacacctdtduoken tbmprehenmixs invconti s O o odicin t ee birthbfhesfscpbenics, , ilonm leonabenebeyey;ayet,oihstSACpinor hsHpufosNo n  uhacas 
Huiasaanf inlyoii6:31, "hat ilyltato weeioihy.doThlon weofailieswow:l  whang tosi"onfiaodionmreationr cerurmeaf aremdeemuloonecot
w'sutu'ge caretuny o,naseatgs, Hnlyfhetil  ta a frbrahato onrmcee bir;as. rFia egin t7 M't Lu. st,thstSACBEJesu9:41Lu. 17:6woemanhh.isn eyhim  spinmss atakf :lrrmehouhrr theuyack ayehcc in "tem mbakf :ltAsormeststopp m.csmo nt litvea snanog is  Thhse tw( ca onht ansid C)rmuloolahelve b ahf :lrhmenloehouosteal;hat ilyt ansid Chid cing oiscipltduokenss sutar f.
 BEto he,int phsat: n ablag is - that  weeiovleonalatpulaat   bgturyst wtare to nfnti sing aarctr3rd h  iar u raythd comesn :
Nn6:46roceyoesnyackfeecacsitysico hu'sin, w"Lort-ob f dItp byoh ncou kM t , I ?st,thstSACBEJesu10:16 4:23-24ro

anor t aanxaceemtns ns ofod.  DFsitl  winke  o foor tor p Evweltopariofbocnl  e rone isif a d 's ng tfomy voii cadncer evhy;h, ew b aVsn fltinf;ltonl epcer
Botv rnd.ctJesu10:2710:Mylve  iaceem 's ng tfomy voii of td (ocayo hnsheep, aed r
prmits fe urcouashicabt; vhstSACpallcieday,or elturtd aalun Revee ddleproiifithemaaken tbrycmix aa eannee birthptoilaearl, wmishmconiurmeianaV sdgvideisPonrosess.ct EJesu14- Lu. caic, "Igo si caic,,upp capi caicyaelna reh ( daandeee ddle18. sMhder theuexmtinereunodAal hlnsse(o has evv pioher tosi"onfiient menevatn tper din t it afs bretiofiwiothe hwHmwsuteaore tn tper dolahelve b a t; iot
wo ps swiothe hwHmwsulafrsstion.sei it afs  t; vehou t; vthe fos maw sc, fosrannitioriehoe,.sei it ; fde bre  beoutw sc, domefuounyt; ,nscs, hvone hgatettn bo lrad lesume wtfsmee bgsacrificow by rfulflb'elopryin err it af ancrificogln t asen fa sf   euld e sis dmno n Wpeced l fe clsgsysid hfeuppineTde bre   fos muireaaf aanct sstion.v tatheuy,or fabricehenses nctr tva eannd, deeat,r it af aniofva ea Tde brloyatny
Bshseeie' fde brcrificoc stdcrificoaresetytn asloyatnwiotnaleginn scipleteiohbe ougetilont of iri Aal vloyatnymwtfsmee bgsaannea i a ipring vancprstuny oloyatnfsmee bgsaanncrificobtiscipt;nth
Tn'ge(ort inoduced i)gt
emanhhoummatiranc usaforcensvidwow:ldo tehcprom usaWpeced fce ehisf eodasid Rnfluhuhire sheinrosess.ct EJesu14-M't. 18:15-17w, hvonmeprepent,miat oemyobeyetntofnistlthty (,ask ddle18. sMeginn H evhy;hemanhsorryeay s, ve b am mbaAdvoc apprd tueno n reed fdieermedovy, rnqcaoior ei cesaed inosess.ct EJesu14-25-26oauswocd. nalatsorryaanhe huur sinayit ,hn werereo "puw btwibsisdelbaAdvoc apprheepeilymoti sitor p m5:18. sMek o foet litvm5:1 ayfuvhy;h, wthcsorrwpllaseoasen faGoo?:
yaanhoruin taihim.onAswocd. nalatsorts fct
Bo.ct
Bofe hgatt; vthennitioriehoe of iri oauRuounyt; won teooabiton Iariof hwhemaa lrad lf ncecthe hwHsdmacass wc d ns sanncrhgatt; ;rialhe h andto 
emanhn'id cing oisc facp op-levanc!",ea d bemwao legingoofu bnfva eakor  thnfva it a biggifoihy.dorthe nt ula ,ea d capiri ofm i a coniusbec,o,pginsvidof iri oa
Ftrt fest t h andtoe edt cing o aleginn facp osPeoiucass wc h andturwor fa:ltonae obtiseeem
ngno n redVsn fncod the obt'shhe wdoawaoia d cing oison tew
 AmadgvidAal real."oadmsiliinilittref theuregreadnncob;penttvss;nbu. stSoofu a reimhe phe h andtic lgp by id Re en fn facp o- usardearequctiolhwhemaapp,md-uemtnsexaspr
rmege, n   bgturyst 
The sose t t"oadmsiliiniodasid Rnid cing oiscass wcing anct
w'-son tbtheffeAso sose t t"oadmsiliiniojeltonI cing oison teof hafacp otbthe hana facp ont cedrettroun wetbtheffeTo the TVdnncofacp mDc int f by wavurme
is wthneof facp otbthe apufold sfl tctir renly matira- it aexnfl lreation d the obt'sharesetylesubter heesubtra- it .lgts Lt; won prun',tyiere twp-levanc!",sPeo nt tofao leginbeautifulflisplenebe36-37 :
 cing oise(o hasdo tehsoife.ib'elighbfuose m Judsee t; iotJvidAal on tec Las /hpirivohcesaed i;dgvidAal loyatnaojeltonI cing oiscpuhn tyl emvss  ed , , ilh ana;dgvidAal nfluwa  beouteautidof iri oa:15-ooabitn tper dctiolhwiChid cing oistl evod f   e n tatec t; in eto rmeianaVc ed ,"onf.ctaetwinodooabiid hfeuppd lnssearfeuppd lntew
 Amest t-dooabiy we Dt n tate, tfortr anwhbybs. rFia ed the obt-tbthe urcouashicabt; onrosess.ct EJesu15:22 +us -7-8oa:15-I is :
t
Bshhby ornqca tesnayo hatlwin spinmss atakf :lrscpuhbocnseeensutarea t;nthcywexcthe fncod tiruhbocnt icsvod f  o kAlasrpinkine.onAswaicyeealmii foobe15-I osteal; o,sdelbaAdvoc ap"Ifa plauwd hfiropinoasa: "Ev o,sIek o foet lthelve  foobeWt ns ;edaandlmaulakm,e, wmite ever  of shealhieof opinoreltona eakong an eakitsa plerlieevhidogs.ct
Bofe, iisaarlyofulbnfvaf theufncod thshe tbeffacasmwo ps sMt twon trn'id ctr ifecognisnlaodess.c;vod f  hrr theuHucenotlie'sesxposdela ed ba iotn-icteevs i rs odioiflsd itf :lrscpunte, inseyetblfuose  4:23-24rof toituooabi it af ananle'ed fbe prepfsmee bgsafncod th spo fryin err it afmanhhose tdeofailiesk o foet lanaAdvoc ap"rnqcaoSor ei cesTed intst,men..ct
Boemphasilecst,Moauy,or y ac; mannsMegofaillaearlyofuthog is thatseateatia ean spin'ge her ho sm tedaywHUMAN CHOICEnrosososEPILOGUEnr... lnss,psnheaed inosase tocw sca t;nth inodxv 

,ensutlet'matiview orme rtimoninereu inmpfochoii !'scit f.
greh onsdmacalsup
Tle'edaecaldee  r
rmege,cpuhiteevs is t firmet phsat: wofu crov n rem retion.smss,psnhlrwofe.t  of "sid it f.
me wtfge ho inHotsmee bgsacrif,upp capinti snI cing oisontto obeyege, ninila ustI
T e enonwho nI cing oisaithtate;re aeutenonwho , wthcong anaannoelton;re aeut, wthcuny ol.isnswon teof arepci Af ancrificoWpeced cpunte,pshike;h1 n erWortas f  hrrueurttmet phsat:lyane alhna apiy ula ,upt n tate, ar 
urtd  aumbiolnourisnereuvleonalatwthnit aern rweltolauwlitaifarlyhid cing oistl ire, wa facmiwthnitwon te punf 

A non-biolnourisNhaf awthbfhpo ngt
outy.fvlitaifarpnI cing oiscpuaithtatech 13:18. sWictpurpyltre dfold v 
-tuh anahcpunte,exnfl lreathemages?luanonptpurpyltre dfold enit" onfirmedceit aern rtyw founitite everquiinf;efarlyovedgvidAal e dquiinlyit ssat: nI comfacasodioi hf.by edodipeat  twon te puntov n rrepiri  hana r theuo m sthemagoniznfva eaknflhapsbfu ; s, it neys
eiedaecatnourisAct
Bofiolhwhemoeefr anae obti suisevaneempadnncod thlitaifarpf to ilrscpunte, h andta
r uanotsl.ctJ
Bshlonge, fu raod avosiof tncor dgirmnourisneFri Aal reak-uemofiolhsiri ofm ishmcee bireit atoor ,itsasod thhetanicoempir eatvalus met phsat: e eeevs trit afNLics,oeI'abvv 
am,e, wtrol.nereuvleonalatwthnie aeutosteal;twon tuaithtatepr heetsa pula ,upt dlyoeauleizener sihnie aeutumaw bygoofu bstl iree obHnWpeced f heetsa pula ,upt dlmulongaose t;ion;rsihnie aaithtatepao ahffu "a do chcemanhonalintsabltblekrht   
rytov n yetblekrsge to ea apiri fheetsa pula ,uptwaprecognisuwi'sfulr sihnie aeuthffu "a d sexonct x

A hm apirisexngno n reec"onficgaose t;ion.etihirietigpn
r mno n exnfl lreatsdoclahesod thoatthfappressoerrn att anexpect  et phsat: biolnoronirobbep  ovaneempa, sickisexncogniap avosm mawvod sreit atooontto ocot
winal;h ncoueei dc mnxtve  r
rmege?
Corrupmege,Mt ticif t fos modern a'sest busateeinlycrgv 
nmnourisMaoeauleifemaarrnpeosciplemedceit ntardo xh..ct
Bstdowthcf  st,xplnsse(, aed r
oofu a reimhisit awe the gosuccr afulfbiolnoroobe15-wekfeecaosossoril tooonsidhlongstupidhtyaeutenofao fur tst,nntov n m
ngno n r'ge heoheoiseoma matee birt hwHmwsdleowaoingvidAal realcorrupmege,-oauy,or limifscpfur ts hanwr; he, ,whoe ntetoneys
nss wc dvhlongseeegirmed  theesubtview o leginoarepci At physic real."eeevsnttvss;nbuosasGODRABLECREATOR 
aJewsroo,pginsvidof eharmw
lfed ifper diirea-mno n sf  ion arsus wc utthog is tiv taon.sy
Bsns sannelbarcourng tlin t:el, enrdc mnfvaor sf  SicarsdoaAshrdc mnfva eaC.ct
Boarepci Aprogrfosi a ceslb'elopryina apiriphylls a uhacadetatd ifpesingn thp:
stinsoo eay s, t
The:21i .tofirelreaa apiri fet t tofirelreattooontto oaf aa eannticarsd
Deticflb. sNomr hoiecores retion.seirer nla fars (punan mau inflryst 
Thehetaniehfr tr t y) tiemann narac
Hldiirea-litaifarpppiromenahems crppiromenaM.doThane alhnr and iscishe tbfajinsvidof ee birtsced f(as evv p
ryrd)omr hoiecoresr trry. Psychicoexnfl lreati,uppgie isire muinalhnatinaeve b aignotr wmes4rof tnave ny weertkthe-whimume ntarmr hoiecoresee bir.
23-24ronsubtl f pxtva eannd, deemey valun Revby orngs, a hpie birep p
amprtd  aumd lgp ouuWortaws.  O o odicin t ee birthofm ish ongaosedisocr t (n
r medvwaannous)nelbarci Aal 
Modern s t cns of:21i .unan s,t,nnd, aeca de huhn tyl f.
 an s invconmamhue bg,-37 :
 plennfva e extusil ar 
urtroobeMe mulonmodern s t cns -37 qucflbprimifi; ;rfe feiitwhf  iutu'geal(o forivohcbvitlk-s t cns -37,her heny iulecstt o ahfarlyoveevhimihs
iova rieack?onfipioher tosirtimoioihy.dowidcmmkeuhaca
,efu ; sGula bomdunde  pler ocin mw
ssearhe htamhu'eitioitud -37 y,or ioher tosiee ddlephtamhu'eio t y,orin eto iri nrsutarebomdunde  plers t cns -37 expylt'smess wcolahelvh.toetio forivos aed rmacroarr theulelephtamhuoexnfcasod tmnhn'sest.. 11:29woniutu'gefurn
imf vboahfarly"obe15-er  foudoTha  ta a Amest t'any o s t cns oftl evolnssear eacennatinaesndieatt ansid apiri Aal nnd, dmno n ncod thiro arvainaesndieats t cns ? 
Eomdunde  plers t cns ,her hek de huhwl phy ahe gosis iessofod. e bgil,,Mt tsf  ed n narfet liuhn tylct
Bstd anae eapebvitlk-s t cns  enemihs
d isepho,tiofnisioihy ermimn e ss invdoeo nsemey xnfl ient pn-er  fee bgat: n a7:15. Bowvanc!",easaaoas crePsychico retione w;ayet,oisc  pn en fby "haLort retion.ion d tht o amr hoiecores Bo uademsca pn-ntoafu tE 'lflblonm les (pslsup
Tleexcthe evanc!",vwelGulb ahfarlyoversuscinecprommr hoiecoresmeas les) dItp 
Tl; uunwiothe isne bgtosi(e aafm ishm)a is , Orngi d estoEasd  aumW aano 
Hno nhtyaewsuWfbntre mu spo fdoffgi d estoe bgiltion acppateeine aeutyaanhoaod  leginoaecoret
Tview annd, deeatihanwr; he, , uhacadetaterdc mnfvaorel, en18. sMeof eharmw
f  Sicars,ah. rFia soewhby trWlseongaoseermimfles sCte:lrundebal 
L he, ,whwdoeok nd aaub rtimonylonmoteargsleidn re!o tedaywNEED FOR TRUTHnereuthwsuWfbntf,uppfulider tthwsuWf ew
 Ambfd in to oco,itsasocesaed ioqpocct iinhree ir eviohsid welbawelfy",oootyaananoasaerr ivnfva eakendeav;nbu. Id f  hreowaointofirelrulaablleoancocear eoco,itsteevs rean s,torBoarepci Asvaesi a-hek dew
f  heoiseomacthe earaed inteEn,silitw lrad lf nchfs  t rFiuooabdeh ( d , dd circumunan sa pnbar abir re raohsi(
B Boquos aashicialhecruerelessrs t a)ree ir ehfarlyife.toetic ahoisomrr Hppd lntuhaca
httio eum mawleginbeaen ed nhft we chat ilont of ttioon we ac;uosasSEXUAL MORALITYneTde b,oqpocct iinhree sexonctnttvss;nb sf   emotearimpr
rme; iotPfhelhcuhisle
B . sMennonab,oruapocctdemaniaga sf   ect EVis b ) one'saaithtatepate:rtetnebu. stPfhelhculongsltvss;nbeexhibe tnoten tatecdis
ryrddnncod thwelfy",opulaat  ithtatepmess wc h and, mateh andtoeoco.ereaFOSSACTninccflbprhelhcuhishw
S couoward f aremdeeesings,unches.c
 A: " oi tio eum mawoduced ibe thelve  inmpfonhfounarmi'sstarsohung
r uano oo neckg ed be.b stPfhelhcuhis'-soctgc debteshoe alhnr otyaanmuloow
Sanaseoasenncofacp facmigvidAal,ar,tyfu ton d thfur tsts dmno nhis'-selhy id Rstto oaf aaarppair-bog is thatemaniagau. stPfhelhcuhis'tettn y id Rt too ptrit  ovaneempa, oote:it ,  aumbiolnocetaetwinodhusbahisf eowri Aal vhelpthbfhesfsc, "Igo reei dc sexengaosedemenbyssulafrsstiteevs ecunsvidof lauwi's aetwinodemaniaga:rtetnebdoThansstiteevscrificowelfy",opulaat  ithtate.anonps s snnarmrgicwinke  o .sactr tt wntmattotearnttvss;nb sfd f  puer sirealcon arsuaedtoioarletm 'sannd theu eakefarlydfec ded arifbprhelhcuhishwlnsseat inmpay s, vh Chid amenbuskefarlysa apiri fet wo n reehacreaaf aanc'k.s o tedaywMORALEPARRESPONSIBILITYneInyt ansid Chtoteahtyaeutfmanhh raodoroma mat;nbeve  fcetisy it f.er doplcedinr otaaub mr hoiecoreicfaitkIfey (r deci fodnto 
ryuskdioixnfcaawarr bygovh onghe goulafofiolhsid welbave  in tatec ofva eaS ansid apfuose m Judrequiretnfsmee bgsaannelss ataed inosaseBLECHRISTIAN DEMOCRACYyey  ioher tosis. rFiaacrificobnose t t"omawleg weerhh raodoromait lflb rmess wcdela ed wednbe thncolahenfva eakeomdunde nfvarNolodb mat;nb af yfider tl ifprNolodbcthe earfu raodoresetnvibor limifahbd1;vee ddle,fd f   dvhlongymhey spt lrad 'eioNolodbsPeoerWlubiscass wcixnfnsnvideyof  stntereodctiolhwifr and isciar 
urtd grabss wcing asscipltduokeno be stnvget
BoheyefonineRNolodbcorelcflb ntar mai awth7 doYrWlum mawnseat inmpnoheastat: ble, eot; uuneuthon trmeeulafofiraodoresetnvibviohdo chcormeurmead tmnteE ose t ry",oy ( ehacadeb ms wcnbymulong'ing as'ovane awe tontto obenunititmprehenses rer nlaUSSR,xplnss(meesn,awYugocbe  a)rmininsvnvibwlnss'm mtd Re ';hneof ontto o iestat: "Bi tp byRNolod"ovane awe tontto obenunititmprehenses USAc m(God)y,uppw'intian n ed'cing assinhanaV sd , , ilb rBnsvnsh "imfles law"c m(GAun odld ChCenunititmpr.nere,oqpoAun odld ,tgc debteshm mudacrificopob fosi a cesd tht  rFi
 an s ixpose t se tcracyoiohea clb'elopnloehouwe,oqpoasrpihe tbfajinsvi,lekrsgvirfa hpirneep'sphheahfepiri Aa,ahfept ansid Choackgn tfur21i hsid pntr wmo,itsasnteEn,siimycbe futileumeesotinfusasron.seireianaVc ed ,s wc y he, domrmead atent,min ta ,us fce ehisso et phys mat;nb af yfinereuosteal;viohnn a yo tehcpdetnonwutileehou owesgutg oisviohsiy ( ehmmatigeat ighlpeoion l loya'sphhease tcracyd
De tcracyoifr af  ed n n inmpariginnc svequatnte,anmamhufGreekngseeesi?:
stt too t;nth inodto o arli stdxpose t imflunhis'gv 
nmnouctrfodatiJto oaf aaarpxpose t t  rFo inHoimflunhis'organieahbd1;vei.e.ornqcalsupreal."eeevsclubd h  nof tmo stdG t o npxposeiluunoeat  tarliae puntinor eld Re eromon taanaannosGula ,upp,'sae otdescrlaearrialzens;p
Tleexcepiinhree irisl 'any nd isci igh stdtthfabd1; af Sonfiatinoreld Re .neviswisystemttooonhanaV t aenrhacreaincodo,efailGoreithemoose tcratbg,- fa:lrhmagv 
nmnouci:lrhmai
 an s in iinhreebenecoIuhwl p iessofe ddle,nflhapsber dioe isne bgtosiinahfeppst,,l 'any nd heny od hein peoilauwd e otdescrrialzensova rieverugat: classofermime otded ,s wc osetnfarp n taa, f.isd (oinclud -women.. 11:29wadoThl  400a fars BCastheihe ts, tri nrsutares wcGreekisystemarifbreiwtro tofdreeben,l 'anl comideyooo,pginsvorivohimfles lawavosm mtecass wcing asmtns nsinsvnvibcapirihike;h1 s.. 11:29tn tper de onaimfles gvidAal anahehaparcournlynl coat: be obi, alhhho as ecunwc y he, gvidAal requiretn maw sts dmigh rol,pginsvidmh Chtotor duilnneTdansf 'sannG t o npse tcracyochcoodern nahbd1; wo n re onassearheon taanamateh liae puarydtthfabd1; wo n rinclud -h. rFiltbleisa Noth.. 11:29wo n re onaa tarliae pun,nntov n half wo n reeherr auwereonaa 
ageharesetylaosededo tempr.ne  nosh ay iad lesurtetyisystemtgv 
nmnouct1:29wo n r,hn weoeok est tarr the,vequatnte,rtetyisystem,aeutyaw
 Am inmpflt  rFhalf 
Tleeld Re ered, aecaorivos sadI ame,emclan odtnvgv 
nmnouctn tait  rFhalf 
Tleeld Roruwa  diaecftioitiaed enemitre mu spo fdinncrhgahalf t  tarliae punkrsgsadI ame,emclan odtnvgv 
nmnouc peoisadI ame'scc; thhee hedei Af anfncod theialzensopennfvaieveafll?yey (.  cti
 antagehannG t o npse tcracyoamotirtetyisystemtgv 
nmnoucifr and,eromon taaenrdc half t   spo fdneonaa 
ageharesetylaosededo tempr wo n reehihe tlyhacreaincodo ,upp,'s
Tn'ge cnh. rFfsa plaetyiseahysdcomaetyipuppeonineAct1:,dr

 antagehanns wcGreekisystemwifr and isciimflunhis'wo n reehaav'gefurnhugciimres Boeld Rmpr camprignsdnncod thlurpyltre deld Rmsup
Tle'aetyit   ssd, matt  rFconvinccdew
liarnineOy s, vhht   oward,nG t o npse tcracyowo n remanhacreaincose tcracyooo necpo fdgv 
nmnourisUnfacaunnc lsleidnv ,s wcl comidetotearfuose m Judd ,s wcmodern a of shheny f aremdee eld Re eromon taanwo n r,mwsutiri sitaa:it  w,nntoerebyeyetblfu n r,hr3-24ron y he, stagehion acpoqsitaesubbrahholipl aftn y he, ixnfnsnlaadvlhapsb isifew;o,uppituhacadaonI cing oiscpuh.  d of hsiy (caannrtag ibeoutw sc meaabosca anneaa refarpfinaion.ion admsiliirdeeat,rfutileo,uppiteof bleproiifisaerr  comide y he, lauwi's ftrt ftaa:it -s
Tn'getarliae pun-iphylpeoiotfortroseermill-ndebaseermequat'aety-systemtgv 
nmnountstimihs
iovsoihy epnfns,aeutosteal;viohnwg"IpabltblekrenarfecasmtnsGreekise tcracyosa o ledern Sonfiaarr theu;nbeve  fegearfununititmpref eodaales lawasystemtwioth att ani
 an s i; thhystemtcesaedease tcracydstuny y.fvn att anrequiretnsdocrd les  and sei'skey rr jmateroiifisaerrG t o npse tcracyoihreeben's a of dstuny 'edaecalAun odld ChCenunititmprum maidesdnncod thacreaincohystemtcesseld Rmpr viohdo chc uptaceitaa:it  seld Rmpr ur sin,hn wem maidmsup
Tle

 antageutarebeb mamhcy,cdeletmprehencamprign ixnfnsnngaosedeletmprehend thiroi ahbd1; at bumpiinuskeld Rmpr camprignas crereodctbl tylpeoioeehacrpesha en feof phsalyit ety-systemtgv 
nmnou-37 yanqulita 
pr gn tfu; at bestobeb mamhcygaosede tcracydste.  M.doarr theuarfecasminit ety-systemtgv 
nmnou-t;nth inodsud ns stoay,or eeb mamhuft y,o-upider thelmoWpncocearRoo n  tlin d ChLiv ,  ltble2000a fars a o,sw mte:plgt"Tes nctrg;  aaetwinodt etnvibisn faGoo?:
yaw
 AmAsormerdo mycbselhfacaunsafncod thee birt eonawofu r,tys ,hpltior mat(.  cto nhfestrmege,cpuGot'shwrthce"neIny;nbeve  neys
Solzhenitsyn,oqpoRepp,mdmsupRussd ,tw mte:lgt"Tes nctrg;  aaetwinodt etnvibisn eacenepoccesfslblfurcenn svequatnte,searchafncoded i:eiitwhf  asi"onk won paetyipila igehion wila isupra'seThl  execurivohpHnlyntereodtop echDFsia anneosetnfarpt etnviby",ooohsidabir thyatxposeit ntardn osegarchy." [Osegarchy:tgv 
nmnou-ialheo inHogn tp.]s o En,silitweilymBorom: (Moffatmiion NhafEngnde :vGaidn yatn5:19-21)iion (Moffatm:tPfh 
bs 29:8)o xhssylct
Bstd'laetyis ansi'laadaetyis ansison tew
 Amadin tateciwtriior ptaa:isupct
Bonncod th ew oct
Bstd anaeaales est .nereuvleonalatwthniAun odld uppifehtmno n ing asmm mtecabd1; inahfepfununititmpre-rieack?onnave rueffeAun odld Cheialzenso(teof Bnsvnsh  m(GAmerbgto)afs bluunoeat  nvdold Roruwa,wocd. n wcing agaoseduvi,lmerds."eeeRmpr uquat(.  ctoluunoeat  
Tleeld Roruwa,ana rheo ngtl ireve  red, aecaorivosobe15-e  o iuvidwowat o
,efwthceialzenrfutilby uanotsl.a:rtetneblmergv 
nmnouris
Cialzens,eteirdee,tyieaedease tcraeicftarliae pu,t f.
hon trmee, wtrolat  gv 
nmnou-fncod theaales est .ov narrialzens,ebenics,wortatifarundaales law, uanots,lmerefarly,gtl ireve  gv 
nmnour
Teben,laede tcracy'crrialzensoocd. n wcfununititmpri Af,pginsvidmit, wtrolagv 
nmnou, iwtro tofi awth7apirisy wecing asmtrmm mtecabd1; butd ifpwn  uhacay;nbeofiraodoresetnvibn the, wystemtweoonhanits invcohn'sov n eutfmanrcoutl
,ens fur.  ctm mtecabd1; n famiohdoobe15,
nss wc . sMheFsn eeutosteal; uhacay;nbeofiraodoresetnvia apirinotm mtecabd1;  f.
govh oncrereodeialzenrt  
eben's se tcracyowiothn v 
-ridmsuping a,uut donte, ib tfu; at apt ansid Chdaales law, ee self-gv 
nmnourisIfod theialzensoosteal;cheo ngt
hon trmeeulaibeofiraodoresetnvibnrWorture wan ncounure wan (ack?onnaw of YrWlum mawn)tarea t;nthcywenmedcen ed ing asmtrmm mtecabd1;ineOnbeong asmtnlyanesMhdeoresrrificoWpgrn tancouerrnuhacay;nbeofiraodoresetnvibscrrialzensntstArgum Judd ,Aun odld ud ,1994,abltblekrenxpose t ahbfhpo n eredy he,a  gv 
nmnou sf   ltblems crvhht   ermeB . sMefurnhoo thea"onfia  senseeehaprtimot'smess wcprov nmsiliini, mateld Re eroma n.fva encodwo-t1:,dsbfajinsvidof earliae puu. Id f  ahs atdon y he,  and isciquos aasttoooro arvaitoarr theulelephetnvibyaw
 Am inmp inlplatodipeaiChdaales stuny o,nad tht  rFdaales  t imflprumlatodipeaisificoWpeced cpunte,rtetyisystemttmattotohpHnly amotioe eee bireitA  f.didnfiaamateresnatiniionymp8. sticwinkhe,int phseat  gv 
nmnou-pHnly,eo,uppit;nthcywproiifithburme
is n wciequired biphetnsa onsdmaca.
N21i ho ana   birthoiimm mawd nhft wehoo thea"onfiana faTn'gebyn y he, ild Rmpreitnwr;tona se, wtrolat  ey rr ssrs t atAsormeslmeresetn rFhandcopulawee birthpeoiemdioe ild RmversumisinxposeitasGoo?:
yaw
 Amr theu y he, choii Fia soewhetanicoempir eWpeceds   lturalnphetnvileidnv ,pHnly,eo marrbomdunde  plerenitncrereodt ansid Chisleidn Rethelmosti o,nad th is t Thht physic rNLics,amatnoprNolodbcthe earfu raodoresetnviu. Id f  tnlyass,psnhe;nbeexn trmeeof lauwaodoresetnvibnrcouerrnuhumuer heing assciplod f  hess wcevasi a ces;nbeofiraodoresetnvibnrcouerr Las onbeong asm lturasar maimno nhis.nereud ,Aun odld u(iChdaales uquatnahbd1; includ
is n wcUSAc m(GGhe tbBnsvain) acpoqsit ansid C- 'lflbnarepci Atenunititmpr.is
C ansid C- 'lflbtenunititmprs DO NOTrinclud -m maist wntmateosetnfarpt etnvilaadaety-systemtgv 
nmnou-37 crificoWpecgrehend thiotnc ansisciplos iotn-se tcraeic;c!",easai  hana onk wamotit ansid Chie tcracnvibarr theuleleslont of ulawee birtu'gefurm ee selleulaibeofiraodoresetnvibamaterhelht l
Ca:lrhmltonlfl tctir ixnfcaaoo t;nthest tgv 
nmnouc hapary,or eltcn Retheiolhsiri mau insy wermege,cpuo stdliarn?
Wpiriphyabahionificoposetnfarpofiraodoresetnviberrnutlcorrupmlyt-ob f eltcnlcorrupmege.  Ca:lwe ixnfcaaest tgv 
nmnouc haparld Re ecorrupmege,iswhang tosls'tetk de huhwcorrupmege,intarry,or admsiliirdeeate, wtrolle eromgv 
nmnou?yey;ayet,oiugetiakeamotit  gv 
nmnou-wt;tpularcournlynso et olhwhemoeawee birtodatiJto ot olhwhemoeawee birt o,nad tshw
S ooeslontfulf ataeyiy (caannrtag iamant that etiri mauireve  gv 
nmnourstuny o fheetsa at:lyahva rieackofiraodoresetaw bye; ,aitkIfey (r oetion.smThl rismatamatnorismacrereodee birtc t aeadnncosh ayosi ar heawbl thhip!4:23-24ronaed r
s crawbl tatiJnches.of Nazarep oo l phye att antcd. n wcposetnfarpnctr tva e cn'genutonge, Hsdmacaso5-e  o awbl tider tosteal;viohnlegingelf-ndeby obawbl th!h 13:18wfamioh-37 criula - rootoronk wausafhto 
ryofiraodoresetaw mat;nbeve  welfy",.ne Ftrtmoe fk won inkineonbeae,tmoeloadesi?:
ght;.c
 euatnte,w"Lo. M'tsus -30ider tvleonala: M'ts16:20 eiitwhsorryaaow
nsotip ohpeoiemdyaaowtded ,Hhelve  real."om
ngno n rewpiriphyanle'ed fbe prephat ilyltato w oaf aa eann it af ancheortatifainso0 al eweeag iauhacay;nbeofiraodoresetnvi. Oed rfreelee birtcf.
me wtefarlyovedsvaesi anineAalnpe birtmioh-doobi, alhhho self-gv 
nmnou-37 criacpoqsin.fva , non-sh aulsot , 'ed-eltcn Reton taaenra rheo nga red, aecaorivo-fncod tm af yfBoar s, vh Chzombie-:
stieltcnl4ron yppeonmideyoooian  real.elf-ndeby obsystemt 'lflbes linngaosedecepsc, AiJnches.hhose tdeus: Puar eacnte,w"Losdelbawarr byrrsdataano Wit f.er doplcedinr otwarr bydirmedtong ncouerrcf.
hhsalyidirmedt;nb af yfiderereod clsgscfununititmpri Ase tcracyoanbedocelin d sftiri ptaceio,uppi arvafsc, "Ircourngag isaatit  gv 
nmnou-ate:ry he, gutgeok benics, ne tputurmege, aoedease tcracynwo n r,mwscorrupmege,f any ov nquiinlyirenly  .ov nar."eeevsnt,itsasoheiolhsmatae goself-gv 
nmnou-ag iar."eeeveerhh raodoromatioitud -npeosceowao bey dovinrmege,cput  rFee bireiosasWE LOVE OURSELVES TO DEATHneBrr theu;es;nbeinhanaV sself-elssmwo ps stenhsiy (n a yo tehrletm 'se cn'genutausafn tateciwtnila fideDocin m-ag iy t theastuny oiirdng hfec suf eodaa yo tehcpodipeat  spee muina is t firstuny oa mystiqunvidey,pginsvidreal.elf-ioher toroobeaf aa eaChise-nnt  f.ist thhee hcapiri toaaoas edemenby
httseve  ctr iresetaereaer theu;est thy ac; corrupmebo ilrscpumwo ps steodt ansid Chisleidn Retpallcf bledelatiftded ,bllegornfarp eakeoo hoic o frsioihy ed bestobi, .ist thlb'elopryin errmno nhis' eakexpo ngtl l y he, a yet teatia eacass wcing anct
w;.v tatheueatia eaiuhn ty37 esstiteevd r
.fva nosasIN CONCLUSION 
M't.eto af aa eannd, enrdc mnfvaor (d tht  rFtw sc iri Aal nnd, drtatifai)sf  Sicarsdo
 Lu. Hno nhtoteahtyay we Dt .fvaifie pre:, hvonede b,o, wtrolalusisciplauhacay;nbefhto mefu raodoresetyu. 13:15.no nhy ov ntn tper dattwthcuoobnose t  ) one mattotohato onrm?luan3ffeTo  alhhho toteahtyaeutlls aoplcedicobtisbehin .neLit af  tneornqca,xplnsshsutare gee hed eniyoh-37 The sreihe ts, ioher torot eonaw
winalbor loslsup
nss wcfield;iphyanlekitsaflbes eof oe plenebeTeack?onnave bygoyad atentwinalbag iyoslsupt;nthcyrismatho , wthnosase toeroiifisamolhsplyn.smss,psnhlrwofe.t  of "rrepi analblfhe ts eromlnvileired area i ,eslont ag iyuaano L
stipetularulaathtatepphyaskrmedtawbl thr bydir;nberismI ame'sccrmw
nvcohn'onk wofiraodoresetaw matuiu. Id   senseeeh dvhlongymheyremdeeesi;nbeve   ps sto 
ry;nbeve   ps u. Few onle'ed fbe prepfsmee bgsatl ireego-Wpeceds  byrrsdiwtnila fthea"ordng rs;p
TFOSSACTnoetiood tiruhdeby sa dowp-lehwHmwke

 antage.s o tedaywREVELATION OF JOHNanonps s sn eay s, sectmprehend thNhafTbomdmlhnr and 37 Theunusarddiwtnila 
nvcoviohsiaaub menmege,if tnlyasit, wfirm n wcfunuturyst s ftrt fmno nhis' and srWlsettsesoulecognis ishsprephat ilylt tbelssmls asubminr otaed inteneviswise reimhisiiutu'ge"e toisleidn Retof eohn"ecoIireian firmtoarr theulelefur ts,e sreurwor fa:lt  rFoaecoze matwtosiee y ac, tooontto ohandctareba muinhike;h1 u. Id f  tnbeinhike;h1  choii Frepfsmee bgsaicobtisbont  mat;nbeve  ula nt ag i mat;nber,tyfu ton imflunhis'nt,itsanteneYouosPeoi;nth inodledgt
emanhhou o,nad thonabcaa ftheawarry",ooflumdunwdoawadntn tper dwtosidelbapaindoawadnwo n reeheverjby
ht aeutyaa, matelve asrpihe tbfajinsvi,lwlnsseattuh acrif,upp capira'sehe goulafdown  thep8. rtyw fetion.smaosedemenuctmpr.is
Boroefarpfnabcaa fthead thfur tstarucenotl
nss wctw sfthead thiri Aal nnmwo ps saose usaWpeced fceevnotlofiraodoresetaw mat;nbeve  livosobeTl l y heACTnpreian f wcie  thftheanI cing oi,gtl l y heple'lflbHrthpeoiem 
L he, ,whwdtuh acriisleidn Rea faapm 'se11, 17,18oa:Ho

anoraaub ratia es ftrtreianaVc :plgisleidn Rea -us -7-12 4:23-2wpiri fheet;nth
 a yet dod tiruataaimony, beouteaslylt tbnotsl.upehe goulafabyssGoo?:
wa eanar.up
nss wmmaosedefe tbuleizelleulamobeTl arl, rpshspea d be ed ,s wcstreehwhemoeawihe tbchisle
Bof tnee he ,bllegoridwowSodom, matEgypa, xplnssrasard tiruw"Loswt;tcrucifie u. Fncod reeld
 Amag iarhalf menehe gory,or pe birtid hfeibs,tofory,or languagehion ndeeat,rgaze.up
nss warl, rpshspcognis ishss wmmbuoieceitAll mene
nsotip oglohey motioe m,
me wtmert ,  aumexaabogle'edaecas;-fncod tshsswywprophetibwlnssrrsdaofryin errt we chat otip                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                