The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2581
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## Fwd: STRATFOR in Sunday's New York Times - Week in Review

Released on 2012-08-24 05:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1803489
Date | 1970-01-01 01:00:00
From | marko.papic@stratfor.com
To | vikrum.sequeira@gmail.com

Great placement in the Week in Review section of tomorrow's paper (now
online) - the reporter laid out George's 5 point scenerio he gave in an
interview. This is great exposure for Stratfor.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/weekinreview/07cooper.html?_r=1
South Asiaa**s Deadly Dominoes
By HELENE COOPER
Published: December 6, 2008
WASHINGTON a** The Mumbai attacks may have begun with Lashkar-e-Taiba, a
Pakistani guerrilla group known in the West mostly for its preoccupation
with Kashmir. But by the time the crisis finally ends, foreign policy
experts say, the fallout may have expanded to include the United States,
NATO, Afghanistan and Iran.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
[IMG]
Mohammad Sajjad/Associated Press
BORDER TENSION Pakistan could move troops out of areas inflamed against
America.
Related
Times Topics: Terrorism in India
Times Topics: India
Times Topics: Pakistan
Enlarge This Image
[IMG]
Rahmat Gul/Associated Press
TALIBAN THREAT Stabilizing Afghanistan could get harder.
Once again, South Asia is showing itself to be vulnerable to contagion.
President-elect Barack Obama during the campaign laid out an intricate
construction for what might happen in South Asia with the right American
push. He advocated increasing American troops in Afghanistan and pressing
Pakistan to do more to evict foreign fighters and to attack training camps
for radical terrorists along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.
Such actions, Mr. Obama said, would help prevent the Taliban and Al Qaeda
from using Pakistani soil as a staging area for attacks in Afghanistan or
on the United States or other Western targets.
Seldom did Mr. Obama mention or include India in his roadmap to peace in
South Asia. During an interview with Time magazine, Mr. Obama did hint at
trying to make a diplomatic push to mediate the Kashmir issue. But most of
his South Asia focus has been on Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The trouble, South Asia experts say, is that just about every issue in the
region is somehow interconnected, and they all have a tendency to set each
other off. The Mumbai attacks killed 163 civilians and members of the
security forces, , and terrorized Indiaa**s most populous city for more
than three days. But when the dust had cleared, a**there was a lot more
wreckage than just that,a** said Teresita C. Schaffer, a South Asia expert
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Strategically, the Mumbai massacres have brought into stark relief just
how tenuous are American hopes for any kind of calm in Pakistan and
Afghanistan, let alone victory over militant forces in the region.
Forget worrying about the hunt for Osama bin Laden along their shared
border, and the battle against a resurgent Taliban. After Mumbai, it is
suddenly all anyone can do just to keep Indians and Pakistanis from war.
a**Step back and consider the situation the Mumbai attackers have
created,a** said George Friedman, chief executive of Stratfor, a
geopolitical risk analysis company.
Mr. Friedman laid out a frightening domino theory of possible
repercussions of Mumbai. Warning: it gets scary fast.
1. Indiaa**s already weak government decides it has to retaliate against
Pakistan or risk falling.
India didna**t retaliate after the deadly bombing of the Indian embassy in
Kabul July 7. But many Indians view the Mumbai attacks the same way
Americans viewed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and the Indian government is
under enormous pressure to retaliate, perhaps by bombing training camps in
Pakistan. Seven years ago, when gunmen attacked Indiaa**s Parliament in
New Delhi, the Indian government moved forces close to the Pakistani
border and brought its nuclear forces to a higher alert level, prompting a
similar response from Pakistan and an intense crisis between the two
nuclear rivals. Since then, the Indian government has been more
restrained. But you cana**t expect that restraint to dissolve were a firm
link between the Mumbai attack and Pakistana**s intelligence service to
emerge.
2. Pakistan responds by withdrawing forces from western Pakistan, where
they can fight Al Qaeda and the Taliban, to the India-Pakistan border.
Pakistan security officials have already warned that if the situation with
India worsens, they will shift troops from western areas, and pointedly
noted during a news conference that such a step would likely upset the
United States because it would mean resources were being moved from the
fight against Islamic militants along the Afghan border. The Americans
have been pressing Pakistan for more military action against the
militants, not less.
While part of Pakistana**s threat was a**half designed to scare the
daylights out of the United States,a** part of it was serious, Ms.
Schaffer said. a**The serious part of it is, as far as the Pakistan Army
is concerned, India is still the existential threat. If it looked as if
India was going to take some kind of military action, there would be a
re-deployment so fast it would make your head spin.a**
3. Taliban forces, freed from having to watch out for Pakistani troops,
are strengthened along the Afghan border; Qaeda operatives are more
secure.
A resurgent Taliban that is freed from having to fight a two-front war
will turn its full attention to American and NATO troops in Afghanistan.
Mr. Obama has already said he wants to send two additional combat brigades
to Afghanistan, where violence has climbed a** allied military deaths
there have reached 267 this year, the most ever. The American military
plan for the war in Afghanistan assumes some help from Pakistani troops on
the border. It also assumes that the United States can continue to use
Pakistan for logistical support for the Afghanistan war.
4. The United Statesa** situation in Afghanistan goes from bad to worse.
For the American military effort in Afghanistan to succeed, the Pakistani
military needs to establish control of the lawless territory between the
two countries. It is virtually impossible, South Asia experts say, to
envision a scenario where American soldiers themselves could establish
control of the border regions, with their mountainous terrain and a local
population that is sympathetic to Islamist militants. So America is
seeking a greater willingness from Pakistani leaders to go after Qaeda and
Taliban operatives along the border; a Pakistani government that is
distracted by a new flare-up with India would not figure into those plans.
5. Iran, watching Pakistan and India rattling their nuclear sabers,
concludes that it is in a better position to insist on pursuing its
nuclear program.
Mr. Obama has said he will do whatever he can to prevent Iran from
acquiring a nuclear weapon, including breaking with years of American
foreign policy and sitting down with Irana**s leaders, if necessary. But
for decades, some Iranians have argued that their country needs a nuclear
weapons capacity to match the influence of, or deter, neighbors like
India, Pakistan and Israel a** not to mention Russia and China. Foreign
policy experts say that persuading Irana**s leaders to stop their current
uranium enrichment program before it makes such a goal attainable would
only get harder if they could point to a nuclear standoff taking place
between Pakistan and India.
The Mumbai attacks, said Mr. Friedman, of Stratfor, a**could leave
Obamaa**s entire South Asia strategy in shambles.a**
Turkish officials have stepped in to try to help, summoning
Afghanistana**s president, Hamid Karzai, and Pakistana**s president, Asif
Ali Zardari, to Istanbul for talks. A senior Turkish official involved in
the talks expressed optimism that diplomacy could somehow avert a further
ratcheting up of tensions in South Asia. Speaking on condition of
anonymity under normal diplomatic rules, the diplomat said that the Mumbai
terrorists a**wanted to create a problem for the whole region, because
they knew this could radicalize the population more.a** But, he said, none
of that has to happen a** if the Indian government resists the domestic
pressure to hit back at Pakistan.
a**It would be too much,a** he said, a**to start a war just to keep a
government in place.a**
More Articles in Week in Review A>> A version of this article appeared in
print on December 7, 2008, on page WK1 of the New York edition.