The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2581
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## MX1 on Marine Force Recon possible involvement in Mexico

Released on 2012-08-09 05:00 GMT

Email-ID | 1799622
Date | 1970-01-01 01:00:00
From | marko.papic@stratfor.com
To | scott.stewart@stratfor.com, fred.burton@stratfor.com, alex.posey@stratfor.com

I took the initiative to check the RUMINT from Reva on this issue by MX1.
I did not tell him our source of course. Here is his take:
Here is what I can say:
Information about US military involvement in Mexico is provided
only as a need to know basis. The Americans have been adamant
about this, and we agree even more. Therefore, I can confirm that
there is Marine presence, but I don't know if it is MFR.
What is important to understand about SEMAR is the level of
intelligence being shared. We now enjoy NATO-eyes only status
through SEMAR with all Pentagon agencies. We share information
classified up to and including top secret, and it goes both ways.
In fact, we are so careful that the electronic decryption keys that
we use for time-sensitive, electronically transferred information
is a code designed jointly between both countries, so it is unique
even in that sense. The degree of intelligence sharing is
unprecedented.
Furthermore, operational coordination and indeed joint excercises
have been conducted, and there are more in the planning stages. We
do indeed have US military presence in Mexico as part of the MI
coordination office (even though they are sometimes under official
cover as DOS, etc...) There are advisors and intelligence
operatives that work on the tactical level with their Mexican
counterparts.
However, based on the assessments that I have seen, most of the
major successes and big busts in the last 6-8 months have been a
result of intelligence shared at EPIC. In fact, what happens there
is trilateral information-sharing with the Colombians as well.
Every time you see a major arrest in Mexico, you can expect to see
another in Colombia very soon thereafter.
As you know, sovereignty reigns supreme, and Mexican public opinion
would be outraged if there were US soldiers engaged in a direct
operational role in Mexico. However, think about this: Given that
the violence continues and that the majority of the Mexican
population believes the strategy has failed, shouldn't the US be
eager to jump onboard also condeming this kind of thing? It would
make sense...UNLESS...the American military advisors and analysts
are fully aware of the real challenges being faced by their Mexican
counterparts. Therefore, I would submit to you that the fact that
the US remains staunchly supportive of our efforts is that the
people high up in the Pentagon are acutely aware of what we are
doing and they participate in the things they care most about.
In practice, we have moved way beyond the original scope of the MI.
The military to military cooperation has yeilded impressive
results. While I know some of the higher-ups in SEDENA are still
hesitant about cooperation with the Americans, SEMAR is a
completely different institutional culture. We are talking about
smarter, more globalized, better trained people that, before
Calderon took office, were eager to particpate in third generation
UN peace enforcement missions. They know what they are doing,
though the same is only true for SEDENA about 60% of the time.
As best as I can tell, any and all work is being done in
conjunction with Mexico, at least from what I know and can infer.
The repercussions on cooperation from a black op that we are not
aware of would be immense, even if the government didn't care.
Therefore, I can't confirm that there are independent US operations
in Mexico of any sort, but I can say that the institutional
mechanisms that would allow for cooperation are most certainly in
place.
--
Marko Papic
STRATFOR Analyst
C: + 1-512-905-3091
marko.papic@stratfor.com