The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2581
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06
2012-09-07
2012-09-09
2012-09-10
2012-09-11

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## RE: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters

Released on 2012-02-27 00:00 GMT

Email-ID | 2975424
Date | 2011-12-13 18:08:42
To | gfriedman@stratfor.com, kuykendall@stratfor.com, sf@feldhauslaw.com, stammwc@gmail.com, bknippa@jw.com, cmcdowell@jw.com

That is very clear, thank you!
--
Shea Morenz
Managing Partner
STRATFOR
221 W. 6th Street
Suite 400
Austin, Texas 78701
O: 512-583-7721 ¦ M: 713.410.9719 ¦ F: 512.744.4105
www.STRATFOR.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Feldhaus, Stephen [mailto:sf@feldhauslaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:58 AM
To: Knippa, Brad; Shea B. Morenz
Cc: Mr. Don R. Kuykendall; Craig Stamm; McDowell, Cale; Mr. George
Friedman
Subject: RE: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
Shea,
Brad and Cale and I had a very thorough and good discussion about all of
the outstanding issues. There is no suggestion on anyone's part that the
August 1 transaction was not properly documented, or that it was not
properly approved by the shareholders of Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
Shareholders of Strategic Forecasting, Inc., holding more than 80% of the
voting shares of Strategic Forecasting, Inc., approved ALL of the
transactions that occurred effective April 25 and August 1. That approval
included the formation of Stratcap Management Company, LLC, the
shareholding therein by Stratfor Holdings, LLC, and by Stratfor
Enterprises, LLC, as well as the Services Agreement being entered into by
Stratfor Enterprises, LLC, and Stratcap Management Company, LLC.
Furthermore, each of the signatories of the shareholders consent of
Strategic Forecsting, Inc., had the final documents in hand for every
transaction, including the specific ones referenced above, when they
signed the shareholder consent.
I am reciting the foregoing to make it clear that the purpose of our
exercise is not to correct an error that occurred at the time of the
original closing, which I take it from your comments and email yesterday
seems to be the impression that you had.
Having said the foregoing, I and we are delighted to work with Brad and
Cale to provide as broad a shareholder approval as you may want for any
aspect of our relationship, including to obtain the approval of most of
the rest of the shareholders of strategic Forecasting, Inc. to the
original transaction.
Brad, Cale, and I are in agreement that the Consolidated relationship
should be blessed by as many of the shareholders of Strategic Forecasting,
Inc., as possible, to document their approval of that transactions, to
document the intention that Strategic Forecasting, Inc., and Stratfor
Enterprises, LLC, will respectively participate in these types of
transactions in the future with an equity participation no less than their
participation in Stratcap, and to obtain shareholder approval for George
and Don's participation in Consolidated.
Don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Steve
CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE
In accordance with Treasury Regulations, please note that any tax advice
given herein (and in any attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information
belonging to the sender which is legally privileged. The information is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action regarding
the contents of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by
return e-mail, then delete the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: Feldhaus, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:22 AM
To: 'Knippa, Brad'; Shea B. Morenz
Cc: Mr. Don R. Kuykendall; Craig Stamm; McDowell, Cale; Mr. George
Friedman
Subject: RE: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
Perfect.
CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE
In accordance with Treasury Regulations, please note that any tax advice
given herein (and in any attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information
belonging to the sender which is legally privileged. The information is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action regarding
the contents of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by
return e-mail, then delete the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: Knippa, Brad [mailto:bknippa@jw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:17 AM
To: Feldhaus, Stephen; Shea B. Morenz
Cc: Mr. Don R. Kuykendall; Craig Stamm; McDowell, Cale; Mr. George
Friedman
Subject: RE: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
I'd be pleased to visit. I'm stepping into a meeting but will try to
reach you on your cell at 9:30. Thanks.
Bradley S. Knippa, JD, CPA
Jackson Walker L.L.P.
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100
Austin, Texas 78701
Direct: (512) 236-2284
Mobile: (512) 431-8336
Facsimile: (512) 391-2126
E-mail: bknippa@jw.com
Web: www.jw.com
This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential
attorney client information and/or attorney work product exclusively for
intended recipients. Please do not forward or distribute to anyone else.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please call (512) 236-2284 to
report the error then delete this message from your system. The
statements contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute an
opinion as to any tax or other matter. They are not intended or written to
be used, and may not be relied upon, by you or any other person for the
purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under any Federal tax
law or otherwise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Feldhaus, Stephen [mailto:sf@feldhauslaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:01 AM
To: Shea B. Morenz; Feldhaus, Stephen
Cc: Knippa, Brad; Mr. Don R. Kuykendall; Craig Stamm; McDowell, Cale; Mr.
George Friedman
Subject: Re: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
Brad,
Let's chat this morning to see what's behind Shea's impression that there
is something wrong with the Stockholders Consent I sent around last
evening. My cell is 202-531-2211.
Best,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Shea Morenz <shea.morenz@stratfor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:47:45
To: Feldhaus, Stephen<sf@feldhauslaw.com>
Cc: Knippa, Brad<bknippa@jw.com>; Don Kuykendall<kuykendall@stratfor.com>;
Craig Stamm<stammwc@gmail.com>; McDowell, Cale<cmcdowell@jw.com>; George
Friedman<gfriedman@stratfor.com>
Subject: Re: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
Simply trying to get all on the same page... Glad we are on this point as
I was not under that impression. Anything misinterpreted in the other
points?
Thx
--
Shea Morenz
STRATFOR
Managing Partner
office: 512.583.7721
Cell: 713.410.9719
shea.morenz@stratfor.com
(Sent from my iPhone)
On Dec 12, 2011, at 11:33 PM, "Feldhaus, Stephen" <sf@feldhauslaw.com>
wrote:
> Shea,
>
> It is late but I notice a sense of urgency and perhaps even more in your
highlighted section and the comment following below.
>
> Please note that your attorney, Bruce Herzog, approved the Strategic
Forecasting, Inc. shareholder consent that was executed as part of the
closing. Please also note that this consent, which is attached, is, as I
told you today, a very broad consent, and is more than adequate to
constitute the consent of the signing shareholders of Strategic
Forecasting, Inc, for the Stratcap investment and Services Agreement. I
am glad to provide a broader consent as you indicate you wish, and to
provide copies of all the documents to the other shareholders as you
indicate you wish, and to attempt to obtain the approval of as many of the
other shareholders as we can, but your implication that you are surprised
at what happened is equally surprising to me, since Bruce was fully aware
of everything that we did, and was fine with it and with the language of
the attached consent (which he specifically approved) at the time of our
August 1 closing.
>
> I am hopeful that there has been a miscommunication somewhere along the
line on your side, because the implication of your email that Stratfor has
done something improper that could imperil your ability to recruit
candidates is alarming and I truly do not believe is correct in any
respect.
>
> Again, I do hope that a miscommunication has occurred. I felt that Brad
and I understood what each was saying. I do not concur with the
implication of your email that Stratfor has done anything improper, and I
do know that Bruce certainly did not believe that we did anything
improper, because he approved the language of the consent.
>
> My plane leaves at 11:30 in the morning. I am available before then or
after my arrival at 3:30 your time to discuss any of this as fully and
completely as you or Brad would like. I am also more than willing to take
any action that you or Brad feel is needed to provide Stratcap with the
best offering memorandum possible. But I do not accept that Stratfor has
failed to do something properly that imperils the Stratcap venture in any
way.
>
> Best,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE
> In accordance with Treasury Regulations, please note that any tax advice
given herein (and in any attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information
belonging to the sender which is legally privileged. The information is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action regarding
the contents of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by
return e-mail, then delete the original message.
>
> From: Shea Morenz [mailto:shea.morenz@stratfor.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:06 PM
> To: Knippa, Brad; Don Kuykendall
> Cc: Feldhaus, Stephen; 'Craig Stamm'; McDowell, Cale; George Friedman
> Subject: Re: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
>
> Steve, pls confirm / correct the key follow-up points from today as I
certain I have missed something:
>
> 1. Squeeze-out merger/Subchapter S election of Strategic Forecasting,
> Inc. ("Stratfor Inc.") -we will exchange the preferred Inc shares for
> a note, which requires the approval of Don and Steve alone -we will
> get all 65 shareholders to approve the transaction
>
> 2. Stratfor Enterprises, LLC ("Enterprises") transaction -we will
> ensure that all non-consenting shareholders get adequate disclosure of
> the transactions under DGCL § 228(e)
>
> 3. Stratcap Management, LLC ("Stratcap") / Stratcap International
> Consolidated Inc. ("Stratcap Consolidated")
>
> "Second, the scope of the consent granted by the shareholders of
Stratfor Inc. appears to have been limited to SM/Stratfor's investment in
Stratfor, the formation of Enterprises, and the contribution to
Enterprises of the assets of Stratfor Inc., and did not include the
formation of Stratcap, the grant of interests in Stratcap to each of Shea
and George, or the terms of the Services Agreement between Enterprises and
Stratcap (collectively, the "Stratcap Matters"). Given the dynamics here,
Steve, Cale and I all agreed that the proper course of action is to seek
the approval of the shareholders of Stratfor Inc. to those transactions,
as well as the formation of Stratcap International Consolidated Inc.
("Stratcap Consolidated") and the participation of George, Don and Shea in
that entity."
>
> I can't believe that STRATCAP has never even been granted consent from
the majority of the shareholders? Steve, you suggested otherwise today,
which is correct? Obviously, I am very concerned about recruiting
candidates to move to Austin, who will review all documents, without
shareholder approval of this transaction. This cannot slow our progress!
>
> Thus, we are planning to simultaneously execute all these items
immediately alongside of the S-Corp transaction, which means that we are
including all 65 shareholders in each case so we can properly approve the
ENTERPRISES and STRATCAP transactions executed in August in order to
finalize all related issues by January 31.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Shea Morenz
> Managing Partner
> STRATFOR
> 221 West 6th Street
> Suite 400
> Austin, Texas 78701
>
> shea.morenz@stratfor.com
> Phone: 512.583.7721
> Cell: 713.410.9719
>
> From: Brad Knippa <bknippa@jw.com<mailto:bknippa@jw.com>>
> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 08:33:36 -0600
> To: Brad Knippa <bknippa@jw.com<mailto:bknippa@jw.com>>, Shea Morenz
> <shea.morenz@stratfor.com<mailto:shea.morenz@stratfor.com>>, Don
> Kuykendall <kuykendall@stratfor.com<mailto:kuykendall@stratfor.com>>
> Cc: Stephen Feldhaus <sf@feldhauslaw.com<mailto:sf@feldhauslaw.com>>,
> 'Craig Stamm' <stammwc@gmail.com<mailto:stammwc@gmail.com>>,
> "McDowell, Cale" <cmcdowell@jw.com<mailto:cmcdowell@jw.com>>
> Subject: RE: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
>
> To clarify, the last sentence should state "Our presumption . . ."
> Pardon my suspect proof-reading. BK
>
> _____________________________________________
> From: Knippa, Brad
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:28 AM
> To: Shea Morenz; 'Don Kuykendall'
> Cc: Stephen Feldhaus; 'Craig Stamm'; McDowell, Cale
> Subject: Stratfor/Stratcap Structure Matters
>
> Shea and Don,
>
> As we discussed on Thursday, Cale and I had a good, constructive
conversation with Steve Feldhaus regarding some of the fiduciary issues
that we are analyzing in connection with the formation of Stratcap
International Consolidated, LLC ("Stratcap Consolidated").
>
> In brief summary, its our understanding that we have arrived on the
following conclusions/recommendations:
>
> A. Upon the completion of the notice and consent process relating to
the squeeze-out merger/Subchapter S election of Strategic Forecasting,
Inc. ("Stratfor Inc."), the remaining shareholders of Stratfor Inc. should
be provided an update regarding the progress by Stratcap Management, LLC
("Stratcap") regarding fund and investment matters, and concurrently be
provided a comprehensive disclosure document which informs them the terms
upon which Stratcap was formed, will be owned, and will operate before
finalizing the ownership of Stratcap Consolidated.
>
> B. In the meantime, we can proceed with the formation of the new
Cypriot entity, the execution of the note evidencing Stratcap's obligation
to repay amounts loaned by Shea's entity SM/Stratfor Partners, LLC
("SM/Stratfor"), and the engagement of Sipho, but all under a slightly
revised interim structure (explained below).
>
> C. We need to confirm that the capitalization of each of Stratcap and
Stratfor Inc. reflects the agreement of the parties, in light of certain
conflicting information we noted in the organizational chart and
underlying documentation JW was provided.
>
> The following discussion expands on the points above:
>
> 1. Prior Shareholder Approvals
>
> From our conversation with Steve and review of documents, it appears
that a majority of the shareholders of Stratfor Inc. received copies of
the Contribution & Subscription Agreement (as amended) and the company
agreement of Stratfor Enterprises, LLC ("Enterprises")in connection with
the action by written consent to approve the recent restructuring
transaction. Assuming that these matters were approved in accordance with
the governing documents of Stratfor Inc. (which we have not yet reviewed),
the restructuring transaction was properly effected and the consenting
shareholders have received proper disclosure of, and have approved,
SM/Stratfor's investment in Stratfor, the formation of Enterprises, and
the contribution to Enterprises of the assets of Stratfor Inc.
>
> This leaves open two items for consideration:
>
> First, the above-referenced consent was not unanimous, which means that
there is a small group of non-consenting shareholders who would not be
estopped from complaining about the reorganization of Stratfor and the
terms of SM/Stratfor's investment. We should consider whether these
non-consenting shareholders received adequate disclosure of the
transactions under DGCL § 228(e). These concerns are, however, somewhat
mitigated by the fact that the non-consenting shareholders' ownership
interests are small enough that any damages would be limited (and 16 of
them will "go away" when the total number of shareholders is reduced from
65 to 49 in the merger transaction).
>
> Second, the scope of the consent granted by the shareholders of Stratfor
Inc. appears to have been limited to SM/Stratfor's investment in Stratfor,
the formation of Enterprises, and the contribution to Enterprises of the
assets of Stratfor Inc., and did not include the formation of Stratcap,
the grant of interests in Stratcap to each of Shea and George, or the
terms of the Services Agreement between Enterprises and Stratcap
(collectively, the "Stratcap Matters"). Given the dynamics here, Steve,
Cale and I all agreed that the proper course of action is to seek the
approval of the shareholders of Stratfor Inc. to those transactions, as
well as the formation of Stratcap International Consolidated Inc.
("Stratcap Consolidated") and the participation of George, Don and Shea in
that entity.
>
> 2. Stratcap Consolidated
>
> Given the lack of approval of the Stratcap Matters, we cannot (as we
previously hoped) rely on the percentage interests granted to each of
Enterprises and Stratfor Holdings, LLC (resulting in a combined 22.5%
beneficial interest to the shareholders of Stratfor Inc.) as a model by
which to eliminate any damages suffered by those shareholders in
connection with the Stratcap Matters. In other words, because the
capitalization of Stratcap has not been ratified by the shareholders of
Stratfor Inc., modeling the capitalization of future entities after
Stratcap affords no protection against claims of self-dealing, breach of
fiduciary duty, etc. Accordingly, we would be well advised to hold off on
finalizing the formation of Stratcap Consolidated until we are able to
confirm approval of the Stratcap Matters from the shareholders of Stratfor
Inc.
>
> 3. Timing & Interim Solution
>
> We understand that Stratfor Inc. is preparing to send materials to its
shareholders relating to a proposed squeeze-out merger and the election to
treat Stratfor Inc. as a Subchapter S corporation. Once this has been
completed, Stratfor Inc. will be in a position to approach the remaining
shareholders to request that they approve the Stratcap Matters. Steve
believes that we would be able to obtain close to 100% approval of the
Stratcap Matters, which would dramatically reduce the fiduciary duty risks
associated with the formation and operation of Stratcap and its related
entities. These two consecutive approval processes may, however, take us
into January, which necessitates an interim solution.
>
> To that end, we propose to use Stratcap as a surrogate entity until we
are able to obtain shareholder approval of the formation of Stratcap
Consolidated (together with the other Stratcap Matters). We should be
able to proceed with the formation of the Cypriot entity that was to be a
subsidiary of Stratcap Consolidated as a subsidiary of Stratcap instead.
Using Stratcap as a surrogate would also entail reworking the SM/Stratfor
promissory note to allow Shea's cash advances to go to Stratcap rather
than to Stratcap Consolidated. With regard to Sipho, his consulting
agreement could be set up to belong to the newly formed Cypriot entity
(which we will ultimately move under Stratcap Consolidated).
>
> Note that, though Sipho's consulting agreement provides for the
calculation of his "performance bonus" on the basis of 77.5% of
"distributed cash" (i.e., distributed cash after subtracting the 22.5%
beneficial interest of Stratfor Inc.), and, as noted above, this 22.5%
figure has been disendowed of its "magic" protective status, we see no
purely legal reason that the consulting agreement with Sipho (being an
arms-length transaction) cannot use this figure if it is acceptable to you
from a business perspective. Of course, whatever terms you agree upon
with Sipho will benefit the owners of Stratcap, and (by extension)
Stratfor Inc., ratably, regardless of the percentage of distributed cash
you agree to make available to Sipho. The proper percentage to use in
this context is a business question rather than a legal one.
>
> If these interim measures are acceptable, we should be able to move
forward with finalizing the Cypriot entity and the consulting agreement
with Sipho while working on the Stratfor Inc. shareholder approvals in
parallel.
>
> 4. Capitalization
>
> On a more perfunctory note, we need to confirm the capitalization of
Stratcap and Enterprises. It appears that the percentages reflected on
the organizational chart that we received do exactly tie-out with the
percentages in the ownership documents we reviewed. The difference are
not material, and they may simply result from the organizational chart's
of approximate percentages, but we want to be sure to nail-town the
precise calculations.
>
> See below for a summary of (i) the percentages reflected on the
organizational chart with respect to each entity, (ii) the number of units
assigned to each member in the respective company agreements, (iii) each
member's non-incentive ownership percentage, based on units held (per
company agreements), and (iv) each member's total ownership percentage
(incentive and non-incentive, assuming no forfeiture), based on units held
(per company agreements).
>
> Stratcap Management LLC
>
> (i)
> Org. Chart
>
> (ii)
> Company Agreement (Units)
>
> (iii)
> Co. Agmt. Percentage (w/o incentive units)
>
> (iv)
> Co. Agmt. Percentage (with incentive units)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Stratfor Holdings, LLC (Class A Units)
>
> 18%
>
> 180,000
>
> 20.00%
>
> 19.15%
>
> Stratfor Enterprises, LLC (Class A Units)
>
> 5%
>
> 45,000
>
> 5.00%
>
> 4.79%
>
> SM/Stratfor Partners, LLC (Class A Units)
>
> 72%
>
> 630,000
>
> 70.00%
>
> 67.02%
>
> SM/Stratfor Partners, LLC (Series 1 Incentive)
>
> --
>
> 20,000
>
> --
>
> 2.13%
>
> Shea Morenz (Series 2 Incentive)
>
> --
>
> 20,000
>
> --
>
> 2.13%
>
> George Freidman (Class A Units)
>
> 5%
>
> 45,000
>
> 5.00%
>
> 4.79%
>
> TOTAL:
>
> 100%
>
> 940,000
>
> 100.00%
>
> 100.00%
>
>
> Stratfor Enterprises, LLC
>
> Org. Chart
>
> Company Agreement (Units)
>
> Co. Agmt. Percentage (w/o incentive units)
>
> Co. Agmt. Percentage (with incentive units)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Class A Units)
>
> 90%
>
> 180,000
>
> 90.00%
>
> 81.82%
>
> SM/Stratfor Partners, LLC (Class A Units)
>
> 10%
>
> 20,000
>
> 10.00%
>
> 9.09%
>
> Shea Morenz (Incentive Units)
>
> --
>
> 20,000
>
> --
>
> 9.09%
>
> TOTAL
>
> 100%
>
> 220,000
>
> 100.00%
>
> 100.00%
>
>
> Is are presumption that figures in column (ii) accurately reflect the
deal that was made with respect to Stratcap and Enterprises, and that the
organizational chart should be revised accordingly. We'll go with this
assumption unless you inform us to the contrary.
>
> Steve, feel free to chime in with any additions and/or corrections.
>
> Thanks.
>
> BK
>
> Bradley S. Knippa, JD, CPA
> Jackson Walker L.L.P.
> 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100
> Austin, Texas 78701
> Direct: (512) 236-2284
> Mobile: (512) 431-8336
> Facsimile: (512) 391-2126
> E-mail: bknippa@jw.com<mailto:bknippa@jw.com>
> Web: www.jw.com
>
> This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential
attorney client information and/or attorney work product exclusively for
intended recipients. Please do not forward or distribute to anyone else.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please call (512) 236-2284 to
report the error then delete this message from your system. The
statements contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute an
opinion as to any tax or other matter. They are not intended or written to
be used, and may not be relied upon, by you or any other person for the
purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under any Federal tax
law or otherwise.
>
>
> <27 stratfor - consent of the stockholders of strategic forecasting,
> inc..pdf>