Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02 2011/05/03 2011/05/04 2011/05/05 2011/05/06 2011/05/07 2011/05/08

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/09 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/09 2002/11
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown Consulate Fukuoka
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy Niamey Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples Consulate Naha
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sapporo Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AU ASEC AE AF AORC AEMR AMGT ABUD AFFAIRS APER AS AMED AY AG AR AJ AL AID AM AODE ABLD AMG AFIN ATRN AGAO AFU AN AA ALOW APECO ADM ARF ASEAN APEC AMBASSADOR AO ASUP AZ AADP ACOA ANET AMCHAMS ACABQ ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG APCS AGMT AINF AIT AORL ACS AFSI AFSN ACBAQ AFGHANISTAN ADANA ADPM AX ADCO AECL AMEX ACAO ASCH AORG AGR AROC ASIG AND ARM AQ ATFN AC AUC ASEX AER AVERY AGRICULTURE
BL BR BO BA BD BM BK BG BU BB BH BTIO BY BEXP BP BE BRUSSELS BF BIDEN BT BX BC BILAT BN BBSR BTIU BWC BMGT
CA CASC CVIS CM CH CO CU CD CWC CI CS CY CMGT CF CG CR CB CV CW CE CBW CT CPAS COUNTERTERRORISM CJAN CODEL CIDA CDG CDC CIA CTR CNARC CSW CN CONS CLINTON COE CROS CARICOM CONDOLEEZZA COUNTER CL COM CICTE CIS CFED COUNTRY CJUS CBSA CEUDA CLMT CAC COPUOS CIC CBE CHR CTM CVR CITEL CLEARANCE CACS CAN CITT CARSON CACM CDB CAPC CKGR CBC
DEAX DR DJ DA DEA DOMESTIC DO DK DHS DAO DCM DTRA DISENGAGEMENT DOD DPRK DEPT DOE DS DE DEFENSE
EC EG EPET ECON ETRD EFIN EIND EMIN ENRG EAID EAGR EUN ETTC EAIR ENIV ES EU EINV ELAB ECIN EFIS ELTN EWWT ECPS ECONOMIC ENGR EN EINT EPA ELN ESA EZ ER ET EFTA EINVECONSENVCSJA EUMEM ETRA EXTERNAL EI EUR EK ERNG ENGY ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ENERG EINVEFIN ENVR ECA ELECTIONS ETC EUREM ENNP EFINECONCS EURN ECINECONCS EEPET EXIM ERD ENVI ETRC ETRDEINVTINTCS ETRO EDU ETRN EAIG ECONCS ECONOMICS EAP ECONOMY EINN EIAR EXBS ECUN EINDETRD EREL EUC ESENV ECONEFIN ECIP EFIM EAIDS ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH EINVETC
FR FI FJ FBI FAC FM FO FAO FDA FTAA FARC FTA FREEDOM FISO FOR FOREIGN FOI FAS FINR FINANCE FMLN
GM GG GE GT GR GH GTIP GV GA GOI GAERC GY GOV GERARD GANGS GAZA GTMO GL GF GCC GZ GLOBAL
HA HO HU HUMOR HK HURI HR HEBRON HSTC HILLARY HUMAN HI HYMPSK
IZ IT IR IS IN IC IAEA IO ICAO IWC ID IV ISRAEL IAHRC IQ ICTR IMF IRS IDP IGAD ICRC ICTY IMO IL INRA INRO ICJ ITU IBRD INMARSAT IIP ITALY IEFIN IACI ILO INTELSAT ILC ITRA IDA INRB IRC INTERPOL IA IPR IRAQI ISRAELI INTERNAL ISLAMISTS INDO ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IBET INR IEA IZPREL IRAJ ITF IF
JO JA JM JOHN JP JOSEPH JUS JAMES JOHNNIE
KDEM KU KPAL KNNP KCRM KZ KN KS KJUS KTFN KSCA KV KISL KPAO KPKO KIRF KTIA KIPR KFLO KFRD KTIP KAWC KSUM KCOM KAID KE KTDB KMDR KOMC KWBG KDRG KVPR KTEX KGIC KWMN KSCI KCOR KACT KDDG KHLS KSAF KFLU KSEO KMRS KSPR KOLY KSEP KVIR KGHG KIRC KUNR KIFR KCIP KMCA KMPI KBCT KHSA KICC KIDE KCRS KMFO KRVC KRGY KR KAWK KG KFIN KHIV KBIO KOCI KBTR KNEI KPOA KCFE KPLS KSTC KHDP KPRP KCRCM KLIG KCFC KTER KREC KTBT KPRV KSTH KRIM KRAD KWAC KWMM KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KOMS KX KMIG KRCM KVRP KBTS KPAONZ KNUC KNAR KPWR KNPP KDEMAF KNUP KNNPMNUC KERG KGIT KPAI KTLA KFSC KCSY KSAC KTRD KID KOM KMOC KJUST KGCC KREL KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KFTFN KO KNSD KHUM KSEC KCMR KCHG KICA KPIN KESS KDEV KCGC KWWMN KPAK KWNM KWMNCS KRFD
LY LH LG LE LO LI LA LU LTTE LAB LOG LT LABOR
MOPS MCAP MPOS MARR MO MNUC MX MASS MG MY MU ML MR MILITARY MTCRE MT MEPP MA MDC MP MAR MASSMNUC MARAD MAPP MZ MD MI MEETINGS MK MCC MEPN MRCRE MAS MIL MASC MC MV MTCR MIK MUCN MEDIA MERCOSUR MW MOPPS MTS MLS MILI MTRE MEPI MQADHAFI MAPS
NO NATO NL NP NZ NSF NI NH NG NAFTA NU NASA NR NATOPREL NSSP NSG NA NT NW NK NPT NPA NATIONAL NPG NSFO NS NSC NE NGO NDP NIPP NRR NEW NZUS NC NAR NV NORAD
OTRA OPCW OVIP OAS OREP OPIC OIIP OPRC ODIP OEXC OPDC OSCE OIC OSCI OECD OFDP OFDA OMIG OPAD OFFICIALS OVP OIE OHUM OCS OBSP OTR OSAC ON OCII OES
PGOV PREL PHUM PTER PINS PINR PREF PK PROP PA PARM PBTS PMAR PM PGIV PE PRAM PHUH PHSA PL PNAT PO PLN PAO PSA PHUMPGOV PF PEL PBIO POLITICS PHUMBA PAS POL PREO PAHO PMIL POGOV POV PAK PNR PRL PG PREFA PSI PINL PU PARMS PRGOV PALESTINIAN PAIGH POLITICAL PARTIES POSTS PROG PORG PTBS PUNE POLICY PDOV PCI PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PP PS PY PTERE PGOF PKFK PSOE PEPR PPA PINT PRELP PSEPC PGOVE PINF PNG PGOC PFOR PCUL POLINT PGGV PHALANAGE PARTY PGOVLO PHUS PDEM PECON PROV PHUMPREL
QA
RS RU RELATIONS RW RO RM RP ROOD RICE RUPREL RSO RCMP REACTION REPORT REGION RIGHTS RF RFE RSP RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT
SU SCUL SNAR SOCI SF SA SHUM SENV SP SR SY SANC SC SMIG SZ SARS SW SEVN SO SEN SL SNARCS SNARN SI SG SN SH SYR SAARC SPCE SHI SCRS SENVKGHG SYRIA SWE STEINBERG SIPRS ST SNARIZ SSA SK SPCVIS SOFA SIPDIS SAN
TC TI TBIO TH TSPL TRGY TSPA TPHY TU TW TS TAGS TK TX TNGD TZ TF TL TV TN TD TIP TR TP TO TT TFIN THPY TERRORISM TINT TRSY TURKEY TBID
US UK UNGA UP UZ UNMIK USTR UNO UNSC UN UNESCO UNAUS UNHRC UY UG UNHCR UNCND USOAS USEU UNICEF UNEP UV UNPUOS UNCSD USUN UNCHR UNDC USNC UE UNDP UNC USPS USAID UNVIE UAE UNFICYP UNODC UNCHS UNIDROIT UNDESCO UNCHC
VE VT VZ VTIZ VTPREL VAT VC VM VN VTEG VI
WHO WTRO WS WZ WHA WI WMD WHTI WA WTO WMO WBG WITH WIPO WTRQ WFP WWARD WB WEU
XR XM XL XS XW XF XG XT XU XA XK XY XV XB XZ XQ XC XTAG XX XE XD XH XI
YM YI YE YMCS
ZB ZU ZP ZR ZI ZANU ZL ZF ZJ ZO ZEALAND ZK ZN ZA ZOELLICK

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 09PANAMA519, PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA519.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
09PANAMA519 | 2009-06-30 17:05 | 2011-04-07 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Panama
Appears in these articles: http://www.padigital.com.pa/periodico/edicion-actual/wikileaks-panama-interna.php?story_id=1027140&codeth=1593

`

    VZCZCXYZ0025
    OO RUEHWEB

    DE RUEHZP #0519/01 1811705
    ZNY CCCCC ZZH
    O 301705Z JUN 09
    FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
    TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3538
    INFO RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 0334
    RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN IMMEDIATE 0019
    RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE
    RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
    RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL IMMEDIATE

` `

    C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000519

    SIPDIS

    DEPT OF COMMERCE - MATTHEW GAISFORD
    DEPT OF TREASURY - SARA SENICH

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/29/2019
    TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD MARR PM EWWT
    SUBJECT: PRIMARY PANAMA CANAL CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED

    REF: 2009 PANAMA 195

    Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

    -------
    SUMMARY
    -------

    1) (C) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's $3.35 billion third set of locks contract is
    expected to be July 9. Three competing consortia submitted
    bids and are led by the following firms: 1) Bechtel
    (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and 3) Sacyr (Spanish).
    Reportedly, both Bechtel and ACS submitted technically
    compliant bids priced over $4 billion; however, there are
    doubts about Sacyr's technical and financial compliance.
    Unfortunately, there is no clear standard for minimal
    technical compliance and how a technically non-compliant bid
    would be disqualified. Sacyr's price reportedly is lower
    than $4 billion and price weighs heavily in the determination
    of the winner. Additionally, Sacyr's bid is reportedly
    supported by government export credit agencies reinsuring
    their bonding syndicate, which is against the spirit of the
    Panama Canal Authority's (ACP) public efforts to not involve
    sovereign guarantees (the inclusion of which masks a
    consortium's financial well-being and provides a financial
    bidding advantage). Post will continue to monitor the
    process, to advocate for Bechtel, and to promote U.S. based
    content.

    ------------------------------
    A WINNER WILL SOON BE DECLARED
    (IF THE BID IS RIGHT)
    ---------------------

    ¶2. (SBU) The public ceremony to announce a winner for the
    Panama Canal's third set of locks contract is expected to be
    held between July 2 and July 14, according to private
    statements made by representatives of the ACP and Canal
    Expansion Project Advisor CH2MHill to Embassy and consortia
    staff. July 9 is the most commonly reported date. As
    explained in reftel, the financial portion of the bids will
    be opened and scored during a ceremony. The financial score
    (45% of the total points) will then be combined with the
    technical score (55% of the total points), which is currently
    being calculated by a team of experts. The winner will then
    be instantaneously and publicly announced. However, if the
    winner's financial bid is higher than the ACP's price cap
    (which will be revealed moments before the consortia's
    financial bids are opened), the winner will be asked to lower
    their price to within the price cap. If the winner does not
    accept the price cap price, then the ACP will allow all
    consortia, who submitted technically and financially
    compliant bids, to resubmit price proposals. These new price
    proposals would then be combined with already determined
    technical proposals and a new winner would be declared. If
    the price is still too high, the ACP can raise its price
    ceiling (which would need approval by the National Assembly)
    or void the entire bidding process.

    --------------------------
    COMPETITORS AND THEIR BIDS
    --------------------------

    ¶3. (C) Three consortia submitted bids and are led by the
    following firms: 1) Bechtel (American), 2) ACS (Spanish), and
    3) Sacyr (Spanish). According to a representative from the
    Canal Expansion Project Advisor (American firm CH2MHill),
    each consortium submitted differing bids. Bechtel reportedly
    produced the "Rolls Royce" set of locks, which exceeded ACP
    requirements, including for throughput. (As laid out in the
    public bid documents, a consortium does not receive extra
    points for exceeding requirements.) ACS reportedly more
    closely followed the ACP's requirements. Sacyr, according to
    CH2MHill, submitted a technical proposal, which may not be
    minimally acceptable. Due to the publicly available criteria
    for scoring the technical proposals and assuming initial
    reports are accurate, it is anticipated that Bechtel and ACS
    will receive roughly the same technical score. Sacyr, if
    they are found technically compliant/viable, would score only
    slightly lower. Thus, if the technical scores are close,
    price will be the determining factor in the formula to
    determine the winner.

    ¶4. (C) Reports of the prices attached to the bids roughly
    track the quality. According to consortia members, both
    Bechtel and ACS have bids that "start with a 4" - meaning
    over $4 billion. Sacyr, via consortium member Impregilo,
    leaked to the press the price of $3.7 billion on April 21 and
    stated that they have the lowest price. Depending on the
    accuracy of the leaked price data, Sacyr's financial score
    could be significantly better than Bechtel's and ACS's.
    (Leaking the bid price is a breach of the bidding rules.
    Impregilo recently broke the bidding rules again by declaring
    that the Sacyr-led consortium has the highest technical
    score. Absent a breach in ACP security, this information was
    unknowable at the time of the statements. ACS and Bechtel
    have both written strong protest letters to the ACP.) Post's
    Senior Commercial Officer reports that during an unrelated
    meeting, a senior ACP official accidentally stated the ACP
    price ceiling is $3.62 billion.

    -------------------------
    SACYR - POTENTIAL SPOILER
    -------------------------

    ¶5. (C) When combined the financial and technical components
    of the bid are combined in 45% and 55% proportions
    respectively, the Sacyr bid could win this "best value"
    competition. A Sacyr win could be disconcerting. Sacyr is
    considered bankrupt and is being propped up by the Spanish
    government. Therefore, besides possibly having a design that
    is not workable, a Sacyr wins adds financial risk to the
    locks construction. The bid process has protections against
    non-compliant bids, if the ACP chooses to activate the
    protections. If a bid is technically non-compliant (and the
    ACP has not detailed the exact parameters of a technically
    non-compliant bid), the ACP has the option to not even open
    the price envelope. Bechtel representatives told the
    Ambassador on June 24 that they prefer this path. If a bid
    is financially non-compliant, the ACP possibly can reject the
    offer. A bid would be financially non-compliant if a
    consortium failed a financial health audit, which will be
    conducted on the winner. All consortia were determined by
    the ACP to be financially healthy as of November 15, 2007
    during the pre-qualification phase. Based upon previous
    decisions to keep all consortia in the process, the ACP is
    not expected to disqualify any consortium.

    --------------------------------
    SACYR - RECEIVING STATE SUPPORT?
    --------------------------------

    ¶6. (C) Based upon reports from representatives from competing
    consortia, Sacyr's $50 million performance bond is backed by
    the government export credit agencies of Spain
    (CESCE-Secretaria de Estado de Comercio), France
    (COFACE-Compagnie Francaise D'Assurance Pour le Commerce
    Extereur), and Italy (SACE-Servize Assicurativi del Commercio
    Estero). Sacyr gained a competitive advantage by securing
    the near equivalent of a sovereign guarantee apparently at no
    additional cost and no additional scrutiny of their books
    (vice Bechtel and ACS who had to purchase the bond on the
    open market and subjected their firms to some level of
    financial evaluation). This arrangement goes against ACP
    Administrator Aleman's publicly expressed desire not to have
    sovereign guarantees, because the performance bond ideally
    should serve as a surrogate for a consortium's financial
    health. If a consortium could not provide the $50 million
    performance bond, then the consortium was probably not
    financially healthy. If Sacyr wins, litigation from Bechtel
    or ACS is likely. For ACS, there is the added dimension of
    why the Spanish government is helping one Spanish consortium
    and not the other. It should be noted, however, that the ACP
    has not prohibited use of export credit agencies in the
    bidding process.

    -------
    COMMENT
    -------

    ¶7. (SBU) In essence, the ACP created a transparent process
    and now - due to rigid adherence to that process - may choose
    a consortium that provides the "best value," on paper, but
    may not be capable of completing the project. It appears
    that the ACP wished to retain flexibility by not clearly
    demarcating the floor of technical non-compliance and not
    deviating from its rules to ask Sacyr for a comprehensive
    audit before the bids are open. (We understand that Sacyr may
    have provided year-to-date 2009 financial data that, due to
    the limited time window of that data, could continue to mask
    Sacyr's true financial condition.) Post will continue to
    monitor the bidding process closely to ensure fairness. Post
    maintains frequent communication with Bechtel representatives
    in order to coordinate actions to assure Bechtel is not
    unfairly disadvantaged.
    STEPHENSON

`