Cable Viewer

Currently released so far... 12079 / 251,287

### Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05
2010/11/28 2010/11/29 2010/11/30
2010/12/01 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 2010/12/04 2010/12/05 2010/12/06 2010/12/07 2010/12/08 2010/12/09 2010/12/10 2010/12/11 2010/12/12 2010/12/13 2010/12/14 2010/12/15 2010/12/16 2010/12/17 2010/12/18 2010/12/19 2010/12/20 2010/12/21 2010/12/22 2010/12/23 2010/12/24 2010/12/25 2010/12/26 2010/12/27 2010/12/28 2010/12/29 2010/12/30
2011/01/01 2011/01/02 2011/01/04 2011/01/05 2011/01/07 2011/01/09 2011/01/10 2011/01/11 2011/01/12 2011/01/13 2011/01/14 2011/01/15 2011/01/16 2011/01/17 2011/01/18 2011/01/19 2011/01/20 2011/01/21 2011/01/22 2011/01/23 2011/01/24 2011/01/25 2011/01/26 2011/01/27 2011/01/28 2011/01/29 2011/01/30 2011/01/31
2011/02/01 2011/02/02 2011/02/03 2011/02/04 2011/02/05 2011/02/06 2011/02/07 2011/02/08 2011/02/09 2011/02/10 2011/02/11 2011/02/12 2011/02/13 2011/02/14 2011/02/15 2011/02/16 2011/02/17 2011/02/18 2011/02/19 2011/02/20 2011/02/21 2011/02/22 2011/02/23 2011/02/24 2011/02/25 2011/02/26 2011/02/27 2011/02/28
2011/03/01 2011/03/02 2011/03/03 2011/03/04 2011/03/05 2011/03/06 2011/03/07 2011/03/08 2011/03/09 2011/03/10 2011/03/11 2011/03/13 2011/03/14 2011/03/15 2011/03/16 2011/03/17 2011/03/18 2011/03/19 2011/03/20 2011/03/21 2011/03/22 2011/03/23 2011/03/24 2011/03/25 2011/03/26 2011/03/27 2011/03/28 2011/03/29 2011/03/30 2011/03/31
2011/04/01 2011/04/02 2011/04/03 2011/04/04 2011/04/05 2011/04/06 2011/04/07 2011/04/08 2011/04/09 2011/04/10 2011/04/11 2011/04/12 2011/04/13 2011/04/14 2011/04/15 2011/04/16 2011/04/17 2011/04/18 2011/04/19 2011/04/20 2011/04/21 2011/04/22 2011/04/23 2011/04/24 2011/04/25 2011/04/26 2011/04/27 2011/04/28 2011/04/29 2011/04/30
2011/05/01 2011/05/02

### Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 96 97 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
1966/12
1972/02 1972/08
1973/04
1975/03
1979/08
1985/03 1985/06
1986/05
1987/06
1988/01
1989/12
1990/01 1990/07 1990/08 1990/10
1991/05
1992/01 1992/06 1992/12
1993/10
1996/11
1997/12
2000/05 2000/06 2000/09 2000/11
2001/02 2001/03 2001/06 2001/07 2001/10 2001/11
2002/01 2002/02 2002/03 2002/04 2002/07 2002/08 2002/11 2002/12
2003/01 2003/02 2003/03 2003/04 2003/05 2003/06 2003/07 2003/08 2003/09 2003/10 2003/11 2003/12
2004/01 2004/02 2004/03 2004/04 2004/05 2004/06 2004/07 2004/08 2004/09 2004/10 2004/11 2004/12
2005/01 2005/02 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2005/12
2006/01 2006/02 2006/03 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2006/07 2006/08 2006/09 2006/10 2006/11 2006/12
2007/01 2007/02 2007/03 2007/04 2007/05 2007/06 2007/07 2007/08 2007/09 2007/10 2007/11 2007/12
2008/01 2008/02 2008/03 2008/04 2008/05 2008/06 2008/07 2008/08 2008/09 2008/10 2008/11 2008/12
2009/01 2009/02 2009/03 2009/04 2009/05 2009/06 2009/07 2009/08 2009/09 2009/10 2009/11 2009/12
2010/01 2010/02

### Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Embassy Athens Embassy Asuncion Embassy Astana Embassy Asmara Embassy Ashgabat Embassy Apia Embassy Ankara Embassy Amman Embassy Algiers Embassy Addis Ababa Embassy Accra Embassy Abuja Embassy Abu Dhabi Embassy Abidjan Consulate Auckland Consulate Amsterdam Consulate Adana American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura Embassy Buenos Aires Embassy Budapest Embassy Bucharest Embassy Brussels Embassy Bridgetown Embassy Bratislava Embassy Brasilia Embassy Bogota Embassy Bishkek Embassy Bern Embassy Berlin Embassy Belmopan Embassy Belgrade Embassy Beirut Embassy Beijing Embassy Banjul Embassy Bangkok Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan Embassy Bamako Embassy Baku Embassy Baghdad Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen Embassy Conakry Embassy Colombo Embassy Chisinau Embassy Caracas Embassy Canberra Embassy Cairo Consulate Curacao Consulate Ciudad Juarez Consulate Chennai Consulate Casablanca Consulate Cape Town Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe Embassy Dublin Embassy Doha Embassy Djibouti Embassy Dili Embassy Dhaka Embassy Dar Es Salaam Embassy Damascus Embassy Dakar Consulate Dubai
Embassy Freetown
Embassy Guatemala Embassy Gaborone Consulate Guayaquil Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki Embassy Harare Embassy Hanoi Consulate Ho Chi Minh City Consulate Hermosillo Consulate Hamilton Consulate Hamburg Consulate Halifax
Iran RPO Dubai Embassy Islamabad Consulate Istanbul
Embassy Jakarta Consulate Jerusalem Consulate Jeddah
Embassy Kyiv Embassy Kuwait Embassy Kuala Lumpur Embassy Kinshasa Embassy Kingston Embassy Kigali Embassy Khartoum Embassy Kathmandu Embassy Kampala Embassy Kabul Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg Embassy Luanda Embassy London Embassy Ljubljana Embassy Lisbon Embassy Lima Embassy Lilongwe Embassy La Paz Consulate Lahore Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE Mission USNATO Mission UNESCO Embassy Muscat Embassy Moscow Embassy Montevideo Embassy Monrovia Embassy Minsk Embassy Mexico Embassy Mbabane Embassy Maputo Embassy Manila Embassy Manama Embassy Managua Embassy Malabo Embassy Madrid Consulate Munich Consulate Mumbai Consulate Montreal Consulate Monterrey Consulate Milan Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia Embassy New Delhi Embassy Ndjamena Embassy Nassau Embassy Nairobi Consulate Naples
Embassy Ouagadougou Embassy Ottawa Embassy Oslo
Embassy Pristina Embassy Pretoria Embassy Prague Embassy Port Of Spain Embassy Port Louis Embassy Port Au Prince Embassy Phnom Penh Embassy Paris Embassy Paramaribo Embassy Panama Consulate Peshawar
Embassy Quito Consulate Quebec
REO Basrah Embassy Rome Embassy Riyadh Embassy Riga Embassy Reykjavik Embassy Rangoon Embassy Rabat Consulate Rio De Janeiro Consulate Recife
Secretary of State Embassy Suva Embassy Stockholm Embassy Sofia Embassy Skopje Embassy Singapore Embassy Seoul Embassy Sarajevo Embassy Santo Domingo Embassy Santiago Embassy Sanaa Embassy San Salvador Embassy San Jose Consulate Strasbourg Consulate St Petersburg Consulate Shenyang Consulate Shanghai Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis Embassy Tripoli Embassy Tokyo Embassy The Hague Embassy Tel Aviv Embassy Tehran Embassy Tegucigalpa Embassy Tbilisi Embassy Tashkent Embassy Tallinn Consulate Toronto Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York USEU Brussels US Office Almaty US Mission Geneva US Interests Section Havana US Delegation, Secretary UNVIE Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius Embassy Vienna Embassy Vatican Embassy Valletta Consulate Vladivostok Consulate Vancouver
Embassy Windhoek Embassy Wellington Embassy Warsaw
Embassy Yerevan Embassy Yaounde
Embassy Zagreb

### Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AMGT ASEC AFIN AS AMED AORC AF AM AJ AU AE AR ABLD AG AY ASIG AEMR APER AMBASSADOR ASEAN AA AL ASUP ABUD AX APECO AID AUC ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG ADANA AFFAIRS AND AN ADCO ARM ATRN AECL AADP ACOA APEC AGRICULTURE ACS ADPM ASCH AMEX ACAO ANET AODE ARF ACBAQ APCS AMG AQ AMCHAMS AORG AGAO ADM AFSI AFSN AINF AIT ASEX AORL AGR AO AROC ACABQ ATFN AFGHANISTAN AFU AER ALOW AC AZ AVERY AGMT
BEXP BR BA BRUSSELS BL BM BH BTIO BIDEN BO BT BC BU BY BX BG BK BF BBSR BMGT BTIU BE BD BWC BB BP BN BILAT
CO CODEL CASC CA CFED CH CMGT CW CVIS CI CU CONDOLEEZZA CR CSW CPAS CS CJUS CY CDG CE CG CBW COUNTER CN CKGR COUNTERTERRORISM CWC CJAN CIA CD CLINTON CT CARSON CONS CB CM CLMT CROS CNARC CIDA CBSA CIC CEUDA CHR CITT CAC CACM CVR CDC CAPC COPUOS CBC CBE COM CARICOM CDB CAN COE COUNTRY CLEARANCE CACS CF CL CIS CTM CV CICTE
DR DEA DA DOMESTIC DHS DAO DCM DEPT DTRA DPRK DEFENSE DE DJ DISENGAGEMENT DOD DEAX DOE DK DS
EAGR ECON EFIN EINV EC ETRD ELAB EPET ENRG ECPS EAID EUN EU EAIR ETTC ECIN EIND EWWT ELTN EFIS EK ES EN EG EPA ER EI EZ ET EINVECONSENVCSJA ECONOMICS EXTERNAL ELN ELECTIONS EMIN EINN EFINECONCS ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS ENIV ECUN EINT ENGR ENNP EUR EAP EEPET ETRDEINVTINTCS ENVI EFTA ETRO ESENV ECINECONCS ENVR ECONOMY ECONOMIC EUMEM EAIDS ETRA ETRN EUREM EFIM EIAR EXIM ERD EAIG ETRC EXBS EURN ERNG EINVEFIN ECIP EINDETRD EUC EREL ECA ENERG ENGY ECONCS EINVETC ECONEFIN ESA ETC ETRDECONWTOCS EUNCH
FI FJ FR FTA FREEDOM FTAA FARC FAO FMLN FBI FOR FOREIGN FINANCE FO FISO FDA FAC FOI FM FAS FINR
GOV GAERC GT GG GM GV GH GOI GA GTIP GR GZ GE GCC GY GANGS GL GLOBAL GERARD GF GAZA GTMO
HR HO HA HK HUMAN HU HILLARY HSTC HUMOR HEBRON HI HURI HYMPSK
IR IWC IN IZ ICAO IV IRS IC IS IT IZPREL IRAQI IO IAEA ID ITPHUM ITPGOV ITALIAN IPR INRB IMO ITALY ICRC INTERPOL IQ ICTY INTELSAT IEFIN IA INR IRC IACI ITRA IL ICJ INTERNAL ISRAELI INMARSAT ITU ILC IBRD IMF ILO IDP ITF IBET IGAD IEA IAHRC ICTR IDA INDO IIP INRA INRO IRAJ IF
JA JP JO JOSEPH JOHNNIE JM JUS JAMES
KJUS KSCA KOLY KTFN KCRM KPAO KMDR KDEM KIDE KSTH KOMC KISL KN KNNP KS KIPR KMPI KZ KG KRVC KICC KIRC KTIA KTIP KWMN KVPR KV KHLS KU KIRF KR KACT KPKO KTDB KGHG KFRD KCOR KE KSUM KPAL KSEP KSTC KGIC KFLO KAWC KUNR KNPP KNEI KBIO KPRP KWBG KMCA KCIP KTEX KGIT KNSD KCFE KLIG KFLU KBCT KOMS KBTS KCRS KGCC KDRG KWMM KAWK KHIV KSPR KRAD KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KOCI KPAI KHSA KTLA KO KFSC KVIR KX KFTFN KHDP KPLS KSAF KMFO KRCM KCSY KSAC KPWR KTRD KID KWNM KMRS KICA KRIM KSEO KPOA KCHG KREC KOM KRGY KCMR KSCI KFIN KVRP KPAONZ KCGC KNAR KMOC KCOM KESS KAID KNUC KWAC KMIG KSEC KIFR KDEMAF KPIN KPRV KBTR KERG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNUP KTER KDDG KPAK KREL KNNPMNUC KRFD KHUM KDEV KCFC KWWMN KTBT KWMNCS KJUST
LE LY LU LTTE LI LO LH LG LAB LA LABOR LOG LT
MARR MNUC MASS MX MOPS MCAP MIL MO MU MEPI MR MDC MPOS MEETINGS MD MTCRE MK MUCN MY MASC MRCRE ML MA MEPP MAR MAPP MP MT MAS MTS MLS MI MERCOSUR MV MEDIA MILI MG MW MIK MTCR MARAD MEPN MC MZ MOPPS MAPS MCC MASSMNUC MQADHAFI MTRE
NZ NZUS NU NL NATO NO NAFTA NDP NIPP NP NS NPT NI NATIONAL NPG NGO NG NK NSSP NRR NSG NSC NPA NORAD NT NW NEW NH NSF NV NR NE NSFO NC NA NAR NASA
OREP OTRA OIIP OPRC OVIP OPIC OEXC OAS OSCE ODIP OSAC OPDC OFDP OIE OECD OPCW OVP OPAD OFDA OIC OSCI OMIG OBSP ON OCS OCII OHUM OES OTR OFFICIALS
PGOV PTER PREL PINR PHUM PREF PROP PK PARM POL PE PINS PSOE PAK PBTS PHSA PAO PM PF PNAT POLITICS PARMS PBIO PSI POLINT POLITICAL PARTIES PL PA PO PGOVLO PORG PGOVE PLN PINF PRELP PAS PPA PRGOV PUNE PG PALESTINIAN POLICY PROG PDEM PREFA PDOV PCI PRAM PTBS PSA POSTS PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PGIV PHUMPGOV PCUL PSEPC PREO PAHO PMIL PNG PP PS PHUH PEPR PINT PU PECON POGOV PINL PKFK PY PFOR PHALANAGE PARTY PMAR PHUMPREL PHUS PRL PGOC PNR PGGV PROV PTERE PGOF PHUMBA PEL POV
QA
RS RICE RUPREL RU RIGHTS RO RW RSP RP REACTION REPORT RCMP RSO RF RFE RM RIGHTSPOLMIL ROBERT REGION
SENV SMIG SNAR SOCI SCUL SW SP SZ SA SY SENVKGHG SU SF SAN SR SO SHUM SYR SAARC SL SI SNARCS SWE SN SARS SPCE SNARIZ SCRS SC SIPDIS SEN SNARN SPCVIS SYRIA SEVN SSA STEINBERG SG SIPRS SH SOFA SANC SK ST
TPHY TRGY TBIO TSPA TW TC TX TU TI TN TS TT TO TH TSPL TIP TP TERRORISM TURKEY TD TZ TFIN TNGD TINT THPY TBID TF TL TV TAGS TK TR TRSY
UNGA UN UNSC UZ USEU US UK UP USTR UNMIK USUN UNESCO UNHRC UY UNO UG UNDC UAE UNAUS UNDESCO UNHCR UNEP UNCHC UNFICYP UNCHR USNC UNIDROIT UNCSD UNDP UNC UNODC USOAS UNPUOS UNCND USPS UNICEF UV UNCHS UNVIE UE USAID
VN VZ VT VE VTPREL VM VI VAT VC
WTO WHO WS WTRO WITH WTRQ WBG WI WHA WMD WMO WIPO WHTI WFP WB WWARD WA WEU WZ
XF XK XM XV XR XG XT XA XH XL XS XW XY XE XD XZ XX XTAG XQ XB XU XI XC
YM YI YMCS YE
ZR ZP ZI ZANU ZU ZO ZB ZL ZK ZF ZEALAND ZN ZA ZOELLICK ZJ

### Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

### Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

### Viewing cable 10STATE16421, MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10STATE16421.

Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
10STATE16421 | 2010-02-23 16:04 | 2011-05-02 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Secretary of State

`

    VZCZCXRO1125
    PP RUEHIK
    DE RUEHC #6421/01 0541650
    ZNR UUUUU ZZH
    P 231647Z FEB 10
    FM SECSTATE WASHDC
    TO EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
    RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 7493
    RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 6542
    RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0207
    RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1508
    RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2415
    RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY

` `

    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 016421

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: EAID EC ETRD
    SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE FOOD AID COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY
    15-16, 2010

    REF: STATE 130895

    STATE 00016421  001.2 OF 003

    ¶1. (U) SUMMARY.  The Food Aid Committee held an
    "extraordinary meeting" in London February 15-16 to continue
    discussions on the future of the 1999 Food Aid Convention.
    Members discussed their vision of a convention as well as its
    key objectives, the convention's place in the global food
    security architecture, the role and nature of commitments
    under a convention, and the role of the Food Aid Committee.
    The committee agreed to establish a working group as a basis
    for continuing dialogue in order to make the convention a
    more effective instrument.  (However, it remains unsettled
    whether this would be accomplished through negotiation or
    amending the current convention. No decision has been reach
    to renegotiate the current convention.) The working group
    will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its written
    report covering the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  Members will again meet in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process to improve the convention.  The
    working group will report back to the Food Aid Committee in
    June.  The European Commission continues to exert significant
    pressure on the process arguing that the EC may vote against
    extending the 1999 Convention at the June meetings unless
    clear progress is being made, i.e., members can signal a
    willingness to formally renegotiate the Convention.  While
    demonstrating a clear willingness to continue this
    exploratory process, other members including the United
    States continue to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention. END SUMMARY.

    ¶2. (U) At an extraordinary meeting of the Food Aid Committee,
    members discussed in detail their respective "vision
    statements" for a food aid convention.  They began by
    discussing their vision of a convention as well as its key
    objectives.  Members broadly agreed that activities under a
    convention should broadly contribute to the macro objectives
    of reducing hunger, poverty and food insecurity.  Moreover,
    members agreed that the specific focus under the convention
    should relate primarily to improving food access and food
    consumption by vulnerable groups.  In that regard, members
    agreed that the focus on improving access to food would
    complement other necessary efforts to improve overall food
    availability in food insecure countries, especially those
    based on the food security statement issued at the  L'Aquila
    Summit in July 2009.  Members further agreed that the
    Convention should help them ensure that appropriate,
    effective, and nutritious food is available in response to
    the food needs of vulnerable populations that arise in
    natural disasters and in other food crisis situations.
    Members also shared the view that FAC could play an important
    role in helping members receive adequate credit for the
    resources that they provide to meet food needs.

    ¶3. (U) Several members, led by the EC, argued in favor of
    broadening the tool kit available under the convention from
    food aid to food assistance (including not only food
    commodities but also non-food mechanisms such as cash and
    vouchers, and livelihood supports).  However, Japan and
    Switzerland argued in favor of a narrower focus on food aid.
    In addition, Members agreed that all food aid/assistance
    provided should be linked to needs and that the provision of
    food aid/assistance under a convention should be informed by
    a set of guiding principles such as "do no harm."  Finally,
    members agreed that there was a shared view that members
    should engage more actively on coordination, cooperation and
    information sharing in the future, especially when food
    crises occur or are imminent.  That said, no clear "shared
    vision" of the rationale for a new convention emerged from
    the lengthy discussions other than the need to ensure that
    commitments reflect what members should do and are doing in
    response to situations in which vulnerable groups require
    food.

    ¶4. (U) In terms of where the convention (and its committee)
    fits into the global food security architecture, members
    value the committee as a donor's forum, independent of
    implementing agencies such as the World Food Program, that
    has important technical expertise.  Members agreed that it
    would be important to establish a link between the
    discussions in the FAC and other food security and
    humanitarian fora to avoid duplicating efforts.  Rather, they

    STATE 00016421  002.2 OF 003

    would wish to exploit the potential expertise of the FAC
    donor forum with a special focus on food access in
    humanitarian, transitional and fragile contexts.  The U.S.
    reiterated that the Convention is the only legally binding
    treaty governing the provision of food aid to the world's
    needy and that it ensures a predictable minimum level of food
    aid is available annually to help respond to natural and
    man-made emergencies and other needs-based food requirements.
     Members further agreed that other bodies are not
    sufficiently aware of the work undertaken by the FAC and that
    the FAC must do a better job integrating itself into the
    global food security architecture while remaining
    independent.

    ¶5. (U) Members struggled to find common ground with respect
    to the role and the nature of commitments, a core component
    of any convention, although there was agreement that resource
    commitments should be linked to needs to the extent
    practicable. The U.S. noted that commitments have
    historically been a means of collective burden-sharing and
    expressed an interest in discussing commitment approaches
    that would be more relevant to situations in which the food
    needs exceeded the ability of any individual member to
    respond. (Note: the U.S. used the example of the looming food
    needs of Niger and Chad to make this point.)  However, the
    focus of much of the discussion was more narrowly on
    individual member commitments.  Members mostly agreed on the
    shortcomings of the current FAC structure, particularly its
    narrow "tonnage of food" focus (although the U.S. has pointed
    out that expressing commitments in tonnage rather than
    monetary value provides some predictability by insulating
    these commitments from price volatility).  Members also
    agreed on the problem that the current commitments structure
    did not link commitments to need.  However, no common view
    emerged about the type of commitment that a new convention
    might contain or the legal standing of that commitment
    regime.

    ¶6. (U) COMMENT: Members clearly need to develop a shared
    vision on FAC commitments concerning their type, content and
    status (legally binding or political) if they are to move
    ahead to negotiate a new convention.  END COMMENT.

    ¶7. (U) Members expressed a willingness to explore the
    possibility of a flexible commitment structure in which all
    members would not have to make commitments in the same
    fashion, but could allow them the option to commit in tonnage
    terms, monetary terms, or in some other value.  Members,
    however, were unsure what such a hybrid approach would mean
    in practice.  Several donors, including the U.S. and Canada,
    suggested that it would be useful to have independent
    consultants consider the pros and cons of different types of
    commitment regimes.

    ¶8. (U) Members all agreed that the Food Aid Committee is not
    now living up to the pro-active role envisioned under the
    current convention.  However, they also agreed that the role
    of the committee depends ultimately on the content and the
    structure of a new Convention, making it difficult to discuss
    this issue in detail at this point.  Currently, members see
    three main roles for the committee: exchange of best
    practices/lessons learned-type information related to the
    provision of food aid/food assistance; ongoing provision of
    information through the FAC member website on situations
    requiring (or likely to require) food  aid/assistance and on
    responses made in those situations; and possible
    extraordinary meetings in response to particular on-going
    emergencies to facilitate discussion and coordination between
    donors and to highlight situations of developing crises.

    ¶9. (U) NEXT STEPS.  The Food Aid Committee agreed to
    establish a working group in order to continue work to make
    the convention a more effective instrument.  The working
    group will begin its work by March 15 and will finalize its
    written report on the major components of a convention by May
    ¶14.  The EC has promised to circulate to members on March 15
    a draft of elements of key articles (such as objectives and
    commitments) of a new convention.  Other members are expected
    to respond to this draft with suggestions of their own.  The
    report will be put forward without any prejudice to a
    position members may adopt in any formal negotiation of the
    Convention.  Members will meet again in London April 15-16 to
    facilitate the process.  The report of the working group will
    be discussed at the informal meeting of members June 2 and 3
    and then considered at the formal session of the Food Aid
    Committee on June 4.   On the basis of this report, the
    Committee will decide how to proceed and, if necessary,

    STATE 00016421  003.2 OF 003

    revise the terms of reference of the working group.

    ¶10. (U) The European Commission continues to exert
    significant pressure on the process.  As in December, it
    again made clear that it may vote against extending the 1999
    Convention at the June meetings unless clear progress is
    being made, i.e., members can signal a willingness to
    renegotiate the Convention.  (Unless members all agree to
    extend it at the June 4 formal meeting of the Food Aid
    Committee, the 1999 Convention is set to expire July 1.)
    However, the EC signaled it is now willing to accept
    something short of a specific start date for a formal
    renegotiation.  The Commission believes it can satisfy EU
    member states with a clear indication from FAC members that
    they are starting internal bureaucratic and/or legal
    processes towards either reconfiguring or formally
    renegotiating the FAC.  While the U.S. demonstrated a clear
    willingness to continue this exploratory process, like other
    members it continues to insist that they will not agree to
    negotiations unless and until there is a shared vision for a
    new and decidedly better convention.  Japan is particularly
    reluctant to agree to negotiations at this time.  The U.S.
    delegation again made clear that it will seek guidance from
    its senior leadership about whether to embark on negotiations
    and the guiding principles for a new convention if the
    leadership gives the green light only after a clear vision
    for a new convention emerges.
    CLINTON

`