The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
2538
The Global Intelligence Files

### Index pages

List of Releases

### by Date of Document

unspecified
2001
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

### by Date of Release

2001-03-13
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
2012-08-13
2012-08-14
2012-08-15
2012-08-16
2012-08-17
2012-08-18
2012-08-19
2012-08-20
2012-08-21
2012-08-22
2012-08-23
2012-08-24
2012-08-25
2012-08-26
2012-08-27
2012-08-29
2012-08-30
2012-08-31
2012-09-01
2012-09-02
2012-09-03
2012-09-04
2012-09-05
2012-09-06

### Our Partners

ABC Color - Paraguay
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand

### Community resources

Supporters Support Wikileaks Follow us on Twitter Twitter this Follow us on Facebook

courage is contagious

# The Global Intelligence Files

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

## US/INDIA/NUCLEAR- US must help India enter nuke control groups: Experts

Released on 2012-09-03 09:00 GMT

Email-ID | 818949
Date | 1970-01-01 01:00:00
From | animesh.roul@stratfor.com
To | os@stratfor.com

US must help India enter nuke control groups: Experts
July 02, 2010 09:26 IST
http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/jul/02/india-us-must-work-towards-nuke-control-experts.htm
An Indo-US working group comprising leading nuclear non-proliferation and foreign policy experts has urged both Washington and New Delhi [ Images ] to agree in principle to bring India [ Images ] into the export control groups that are part of the non-proliferation system.
The group, under the aegis of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Nuclear Threat Initiative, said in a statement released in Washington, "In 2008, India and the United States, with the concurrence of the Nuclear Suppliers' Group, completed a path-breaking agreement that made possible civilian nuclear commerce with India. This agreement was intended to put India's civilian nuclear facilities under safeguards and end India's nuclear isolation. It was also aimed to bring about more complete Indian participation in the non-proliferation system."
It pointed out that 'the Indo-US civil nuclear agreement included significant changes in US law and policy that were possible only because of India's strong record of preventing its own nuclear materials from being illegally exported or otherwise used for proliferation."
Noting that 'India and the United States agree that it is vital to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and associated technology,' the group argued, 'both countries agree, in other words, on the importance of non-proliferation.'
"India's nuclear weapons prevent it from joining the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-weapons state, and the language of the treaty precludes India's adhering as a weapons state. In light of the frictions generated by India's anomalous status, the working group believes it is more useful to focus on other institutions and mechanisms that can help strengthen the international non-proliferation system," the statement said.
The working group urged the Indian and US governments to give high priority to reaching agreement in principle on this issue in the context of US President Barack Obama's [ Images ] planned trip to India in November 2010.
Specifically, the group recommended that the two governments:
Agree in principle to bring India into the four non-proliferation export control groups (the Nuclear Suppliers' Group; the Missile Technology Control Regime; the Wassenaar Arrangement, which addresses armaments trade; and the Australia [ Images ] Group, which deals with chemical weapons).
Begin working together to harmonise India's export control regime with those of the Australia Group and the Wassenaar Arrangement. Harmonisation with the MTCR and NSG export control guidelines was already accomplished in the context of the Indo-US civil nuclear agreement.
Initiate consultations with the other members of the export control groups to make possible India's swift accession.
Start addressing the obstacles to India's membership in the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI).
It said, "A policy that followed these recommendations would have clear benefits for both countries and for the world. For India, membership in these institutions would acknowledge India's essential role in preventing proliferation of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction. It would fulfil the promise implicit in the US-India nuclear agreement of treating India as a responsible state with advanced nuclear technology."
The working group also predicted that "it would bring India into the process of creating export control standards for the future, a particularly important point in light of India's rapidly growing economy and expanding footprint in international trade in sophisticated technology."
"For the United States, this policy would strengthen the global non-proliferation system that has been a high priority for administrations of both US political parties for several decades. It would strengthen the export control systems of a potentially significant supplier of sensitive items, and ensure that there are no hurdles in India's implementing future changes to export control regimes. Indian membership would bring its major nautical presence into the PSI. This would be especially important in the critical sea-lanes of communication in and near the Indian Ocean. These actions would also strengthen the US partnership with India."