Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BOGOTA3984, CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS: FOR PUBLIC GOOD OR PUBLIC VOTES?

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BOGOTA3984.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BOGOTA3984 2009-12-14 14:49 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bogota
VZCZCXYZ0006
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBO #3984/01 3481451
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 141449Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1573
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 0820
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
UNCLAS BOGOTA 003984 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SOCI ECON PREL CO
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS: FOR PUBLIC GOOD OR PUBLIC VOTES? 
 
1.  (U) Summary.  Colombia's conditional cash transfer program, 
called "Familias en Accion", receives notable support and praise 
from the international financial institutions.  The World Bank 
highlights that Familias en Accion significantly contributes to 
poverty alleviation and equity of opportunity and peace.  Critics 
of the program, such as former President Pastrana, claim that 
President Uribe is using the program and its subsidies to increase 
his chances of reelection.  The GOC maintains that the program has 
reduced malnutrition and child labor rates as well as improved 
vaccination rates, poor families' consumption of basic household 
goods, and school attendance.  End Summary. 
 
 
 
-------- 
 
Overview 
 
-------- 
 
 
 
2.  (U) The Familias en Accion conditional cash transfer program 
began in 2001 under President Andres Pastrana (1998-2002) with the 
support of Plan Colombia, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) 
and the World Bank (WB).  The program offers low-income families 
(approximately the bottom 15 percent) subsidies, i.e. cash 
transfers, to improve the nutrition and education of their 
children. 
 
 
 
3.  (U) Initially the program only reached 300,000 families, but 
the Uribe administration widened it to currently reach 2.4 million 
families in more than 1,000 municipalities and in each of 
Colombia's 32 departments.  The GOC's goal is to reach 3 million 
families by mid-2010.  The program forms part of the government's 
assistance to internally displaced persons (IDPs) -- an estimated 
350,000 families that suffered forced displacement. The GOC plans 
to channel an additional 100,000 IDP families into the program in 
2010.  The GOC budgeted over US$ 2 billion for the program to cover 
the period between 2006-2010. 
 
 
 
4.  (U) Familias en Accion also supports the government's extreme 
poverty reduction strategy "Juntos."  This program aims to provide 
integrated assistance in nine areas:  identification/documentation, 
income and employment, education, health, nutrition, habitat, 
family dynamics, assistance distribution, and access to justice. 
Under Juntos, social workers monitor families living in extreme 
poverty, referring them to the government's various programs -- 
including Familias en Accion -- depending on needs. 
 
 
 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
Critics Say It is a Political Tool to Gain Votes 
 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
 
 
5.  (SBU) Familias en Accion is run out of Accion Social, the 
government's social programs agency in the Office of the President. 
The program, however, has come under criticism from Uribe's 
opponents.  Former President of Colombia Andres Pastrana views the 
program as a political tool for Uribe to garner more votes for his 
potential reelection.  He stresses that the program requires 
special oversight.  Today's presidential candidates complain that 
the program is a form of charity from the President's office for 
roughly five million Colombians, who presumably believe that Uribe 
himself is doling out the money, which in the end will earn him 
more votes (provided the referendum allowing a third term goes 
forward). 
 
 
 
6.  (SBU) Opposition Liberal Party Senator Cecilia Lopez also 
stressed that the program is not adequate to fight poverty and that 
the GOC should provide jobs to the poor instead of money. 
Alejandro Gaviria, Dean of the Economic School of los Andes 
 
 
University, argues that this cash transfer program increases 
unemployment and the fiscal instability of the Government. 
 
 
 
7.  (SBU) Senator Lopez Montano told the press that the program 
should be temporary, focused, and depoliticized, and he accused 
Uribe of doing the opposite -- creating a massive and politicized 
program.  Critics also accuse the GOC of arbitrarily expanding and 
setting beneficiary targets, rather than basing them on poverty 
statistics or expressed need. 
 
 
 
------------------------------------ 
 
The Multilaterals Defend the Program 
 
------------------------------------ 
 
 
 
8.  (SBU) Since its inception, Familias en Accion has had the 
support of multilateral institutions, which have replicated similar 
programs in Mexico (Programa Progreso), Brazil (Bolsa Familia) and 
elsewhere.  Representatives of the IDB and World Bank expressed to 
EconOffs their support of Colombia's conditional cash transfer 
program and discarded the "vote-getting" argument as political 
noise. 
 
 
 
9.  (SBU) Polly Jones, Principal Operations Officer at the World 
Bank, told EconOff that the Bank is currently supporting the 
program with four loans, and positive findings from its evaluation 
in 2005 led to an expansion of the program.  The Bank highlights 
the gains in poverty alleviation and equity of opportunity and 
peace.  Familias en Accion, according to the Bank, is credited with 
helping eradicate extreme poverty, reducing spatial differences in 
poverty, strengthening the social safety net system, and removing 
access barriers to education and health services in high conflict 
zones. 
 
 
 
10.  (SBU) Ana Lucia Munoz, specialist in Social Development at the 
IDB, noted the program was conceived as a temporary policy to face 
the economic crisis of 1999.  However, the positive results of the 
program convinced the IDB to continue supporting Familias en Accion 
with two additional loans.  The IDB is now in the process of 
preparing a third loan for Colombia's highly-commented, conditional 
cash transfer program. 
 
 
 
-------------- 
 
GOC's Position 
 
-------------- 
 
 
 
11.  (SBU) Juan Carlos Caiza, Presidential Adviser for Departments 
and Municipalities, told EconOff that the Uribe administration has 
followed the direction of Juan Carlos Echeverry, the designer of 
the conditional cash transfer program during Andres Pastrana's 
presidency.  Caiza added that Luis Alfonzo Hoyos, former Director 
of Accion Social, was a technocrat who had administered the program 
without the use of political criteria.  Caiza stressed that this 
program will continue after Uribe's term, as it did after 
Pastrana's, because the results are positive. 
 
 
 
----------------------------- 
 
Results of Familias en Accion 
 
----------------------------- 
 
12.  (U) According to the GOC's evaluation, consumption of basic 
household goods, such as clothing, school supplies and transport, 
increased between 15 and 19 percent.  Children consumed 1.2 times 
more protein on average than without the program.  Chronic 
malnutrition in children living in rural zones decreased by 10 
percent.  Immunization rates among rural children increased by 12 
percent.  School attendance rates rose by 12 percent in rural 
areas, and by 6 percent in urban areas, where attendance was 
already higher.  Child labor (for 10-13 year-olds) decreased by 6 
percent in rural areas and reduced the intensity of the workday of 
14-17 year-olds in urban areas (while work by their mothers 
increased). 
 
 
 
------- 
 
Comment 
 
------- 
 
 
 
13.  (SBU) The qualification criteria appear objective and there is 
no evidence that the program has been manipulated for political 
purposes.  In certain districts, beneficiaries of the program voted 
against Uribe in 2006, and those families are still receiving their 
cash transfers.  However, separating the program from the Office of 
the President would demonstrate a higher degree of transparency. 
NICHOLS