Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09COLOMBO1003, FROM AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS TO UNDERSECRETARY OF

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09COLOMBO1003.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09COLOMBO1003 2009-11-02 02:03 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Colombo
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLM #1003/01 3060203
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 020203Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0710
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3429
UNCLAS COLOMBO 001003 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR SCA/INSB AND M - KATHLEEN AUSTIN-FERGUSON 
 
DELHI PLEASE PASS UNDERSECRETARY PAT KENNEDY 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: AMGT ABLD ASEC CE
SUBJECT:  FROM AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS TO UNDERSECRETARY OF 
STATE FOR MANAGEMENT PATRICK KENNEDY 
 
1.  We appreciate your willingness to reconsider the decision not to 
purchase the former British High Commission property for a New 
Embassy Compound (NEC) in Colombo.  We know a re-examination of the 
decision will entail lots of work, and we will accept your final 
decision. 
 
2.  OBO has approved two sites on which to construct a NEC:  the 
Shaw-Wallace and Parliament sites.  Post strongly favors the British 
High Commission (BHC) property that adjoins our current location. 
We believe the BHC site meets the security requirements, and is best 
suited to meet the needs of the U.S. Mission to Sri Lanka. 
 
3.  Diplomatic Security applied three exclusionary factors (none of 
which are Overseas Security Policy Board standards) to the BHC site, 
which caused OBO to remove it from consideration:  a) the site is 
located on a navigable body of water; b) the site has no secondary 
egress; and c) the site is bordered by a railroad on the rear of the 
property.  Post believes these exclusionary factors for the BHC 
site, applied as part of an overall scoring methodology to assess 
site viability, deserve a second look:  for example, the site does 
in fact have current secondary egress, with a walkout at the rear of 
the property, and will have expanded secondary egress with the 
completion of Marine Drive. 
 
4.  It is worth noting that in January 2007, a joint DS/OBO survey 
team scored the sites, taking into account cost, proximities, site 
characteristic, project risks, and security. 
The highest-scoring option was the construction of a non-standard 
Urban SED on the present site augmented by the BHC property. 
 
5.  Last December, Ambassador Blake raised the property issue with 
OBO Deputy Director Adam Namm and DS DAS Patrick Donovan.  Rather 
than the exclusionary factors applied by DS earlier, the major 
concern expressed at the meeting by Diplomatic Security was setback 
on the BHC site.  This was the first time Post had heard any concern 
expressed by DS regarding setback.  DAS Donovan emphasized in the 
meeting that DS would not issue a setback waiver. 
 
6.  Post underlines that it is not requesting a setback waiver or a 
co-location waiver for the combined BHC/current site.  Post believes 
that adequate setback can be achieved if the combined site were 
evaluated; indeed, the current Embassy building has adequate 
setback, and the combined property would permit OBO to construct a 
sufficiently-sized NEC to accommodate all Mission personnel and meet 
the 100-foot setback requirement.  The combined site, at 6 acres, is 
quite a bit larger than the Shaw-Wallace site, at 3.79 acres, which 
DS assesses as having adequate setback. 
 
7.  Post has evaluated the pro and con factors for each of the three 
sites.  Our assessment follows for your consideration. 
 
The British High Commission Property 
------------------------------------ 
 
Pro: 
- Ease of access to GSL ministries and other institutions. 
- Ease of access to the Embassy by our interlocutors and clients. 
- Good use of capital security construction monies and return on 
taxpayer investment:  the BHC property is 2.5 acres and - when 
combined with our current property - would total six acres.  We 
would be able to purchase the BHC for $11-13 million (compared to 
$32 million to purchase the 3.79 acre Shaw-Wallace site). 
- Enhanced ability to evacuate by sea in extremis. 
 
Con: 
- The Parliament site is less expensive ($9.5 million). 
 
DS Objections to the BHC site, and Post's response: 
 
1) The site is located on a navigable body of water. 
--   There has never been an assault from the sea. 
--   Post One electronic surveillance covers rear of compound. 
--   The Sri Lankan Navy conducts continuous patrol immediately off 
the coast, and can be expected to continue this patrol given the 
location of Temple Trees (the Prime Minister's residence) across 
Galle Road from the BHC site. 
--   The site is separated from the water by railroad and (future) 
Marine Drive. 
--   There is no longer an LTTE submarine or marine vessel threat. 
 
2) The site has no secondary egress. 
--   This is not accurate.  There is a walkout at the rear of the 
property.  Though not ideal, this would work if an emergency 
dictated such action. 
--   Marine Drive extension:  Marine Drive will be extended to the 
north, and will parallel Galle Road with a terminus onto Galle Road 
at the American Center.  The Southern terminus is approximately 10 
kilometers south, rejoining Galle Road at Dehiwela Canal. 
 
--   Marine Drive progress: The Sri Lankan Roads Department surveyed 
the land in the spring of 2009, and marked the right-away to extend 
Marine Drive through the back portion of our current property. 
 
3) The site is bordered by a railroad on the rear of the property. 
--   The commuter railway is fixed conveyance with more tightly 
controlled access than a roadway. 
--   The future Marine Drive extension directly behind the Embassy 
will provide additional buffer distance between the property wall 
and the commuter railway. 
 
Shaw-Wallace Site 
----------------- 
 
Pro: 
- Downtown location, though not as well situated for appointments 
and access as the current/BHC site. 
- No height restrictions. 
- Primary and secondary egress from property to major roads. 
 
Con: 
- The most expensive site:  by moving one kilometer south on Galle 
Road, Post would trade a 6 acre (combined current location and BHC) 
site for a 3.79 acre site, and would have to pay an additional $18 
million. 
- Small site footprint is oddly shaped and would require building a 
10-12 story tower. 
- No or minimal space for warehouse and maintenance shops, which 
would require Post to lease warehouse and shop space off the NEC. 
 
Parliament Site 
--------------- 
 
Pro: 
- Lowest cost ($9.5 million). 
- At nine acres, the largest parcel of land. 
- Close to the Department-supported school that nearly all Mission 
children attend. 
 
Con: 
- Remote site with long distance travel to GSL and outside 
meetings. 
- Security implications for our staff of commuting daily on the road 
to Parliament. 
- Frequent road closures upwards to one hour, especially when 
Parliament is in session. 
- This low lying area is subject to frequent severe localized 
flooding which makes the roads impassable (and would affect embassy 
operations). 
- Building height restricted to two stories. 
- Long commuting distance for 15 existing government owned houses, 
including the CMR and DCR. 
- As short-term leased housing shifts to this area, Mission housing 
would be split, negatively impacting the cohesiveness of the Mission 
community. 
 
8.  It appears that the Department may have excluded the BHC site 
from consideration based on the expectation that a waiver for 
setback would be required to build a NEC.  Post recommends that OBO 
fully explore whether a NEC would fit on the combined current/BHC 
site, and that OBO take another look at the three remaining DS 
objections to the property.  Thank you for your consideration. 
BUTENIS