Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BUCHAREST764, ROMANIA: PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN FEATURES PLENTY OF ECONOMIC

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BUCHAREST764.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BUCHAREST764 2009-11-13 14:02 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bucharest
VZCZCXRO7551
PP RUEHIK
DE RUEHBM #0764/01 3171402
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 131402Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0070
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BUCHAREST 000764 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EUR/CE ASCHEIBE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN ENRG PGOV PREL SOCI RO
SUBJECT: ROMANIA: PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN FEATURES PLENTY OF ECONOMIC 
RHETORIC BUT LITTLE SUBSTANCE 
 
BUCHAREST 00000764  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
Sensitive but Unclassified; not for Internet distribution. 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  With just over a week to go before the first 
round of the presidential election, Romania's economic woes are 
foremost in the minds of voters.  The leading presidential 
candidates have been long on rhetoric but short on specifics about 
how they would return the country to economic health, knowing full 
well that the office of President actually has little direct power 
to implement any of the measures promised.  For the most part, 
economic prescriptions offered by the top three candidates -- 
incumbent President Traian Basescu (PDL), Mircea Geoana (PSD), and 
Crin Antonescu (PNL) -- deviate little from their respective 
parties' platforms.  Broadly speaking, Geoana would raise taxes and 
increase government spending, while Antonescu pledges to cut taxes 
and shrink the size of government.  Basescu's PDL would like to 
occupy the middle ground between these two extremes.  In actual 
practice, ideology always takes a back seat to realpolitik in 
Romania once an election is won, and the policies pursued after the 
election will have much more to do with who is named Prime Minister, 
and that person's relationship with the President, than with the 
President himself.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) Romania's yawning government budget deficit has brought 
tax policy to the top of the agenda.  Basescu, perhaps wishing for 
an economic recovery sooner rather than later, believes that the 
current revenue shortfall is temporary and that the 16 percent flat 
income tax and 19 percent VAT tax rate should be preserved, with the 
VAT possibly increasing later in 2010 if revenues remain down. 
Antonescu supports the PNL line that taxes should be decreased where 
possible, and suggests lowering the VAT to 15 percent and the income 
tax rate to 10 percent.  He proposes to balance these cuts with a 
dramatic government downsizing.  Geoana, looking out for the rural 
population and pensioners who remain PSD's core constituency, would 
support a progressive income tax and lower VAT on "basic 
necessities."  In Romania, however, everything is negotiable.  For 
example, in a recent private meeting with business leaders, Geoana 
reportedly was already backpedaling on his call to implement a 
progressive income tax in the face of strong pushback from the 
businessmen in attendance. 
 
3.  (SBU) Regarding energy policy, Basescu's strong expertise in the 
area has left few openings for his challengers to exploit, although 
Geoana has made statements about the need to focus on conservation 
in an effort to draw a distinction between himself and the 
incumbent.  There is broad agreement on the need for supply 
diversification, with at least rhetorical support for the Nabucco 
pipeline common among all candidates.  (Geoana, however, takes a 
much more nuanced view vis-a-vis energy relations with the Russians 
than does the strongly anti-Russian Basescu.)  Renewable energy, 
excepting a brief mention by Geoana, has received short shrift, 
although its further development could bolster energy security, and 
the European Union (EU) will almost certainly push for more in this 
area in the next several years.  In terms of carbon-free energy 
production, nuclear power has broad support, with Basescu coming out 
most strongly in favor of this option. 
 
4.  (SBU) Romania's economic Achilles heel remains its 
underdeveloped agricultural sector, employing nearly 30 percent of 
the population (by far the highest percentage in the EU) but 
accounting for only eight percent of GDP.  Small plots of land and 
the failure to adopt modern agricultural techniques have meant huge 
weather-dependent swings in production every year.  The large rural 
population has made reaching this constituency a priority for all of 
the presidential candidates.  Antonescu believes that support for 
entrepreneurship and efforts to improve access to commercial credit 
would help this sector to grow.  Basescu, perhaps recognizing that 
GDP is being held back in part by underemployed laborers in the 
rural sector, would like to find ways to reduce the agricultural 
workforce and move excess labor to other sectors, although he offers 
few specifics.  Geoana, on the other hand, has vowed to train a 
cadre of farmers in new technologies, while offering the proven 
vote-getter of "living credits" (subsidies) to make rural life more 
attractive to young farmers. 
 
5.  (SBU) Underinvestment in infrastructure is another commonly 
recognized barrier to Romania's further growth.  While EU funds 
could help, none of the parties has proven capable while in 
government of fully tapping this potential resource.  Of the funds 
available to Romania since 2005, only 2.11 percent had been 
disbursed as of September 1, 2009, with a miniscule 0.09 percent 
going to transportation projects.  Both Basescu and Geoana 
acknowledge the pressing need for infrastructure improvements, yet 
offer few solutions (aside from promising better use of EU funds) 
for financing them.  Geoana has suggested a better coordinating body 
for accessing EU funds, while the current PDL government has tried a 
similar tactic to improve Romania's poor absorption rate, with only 
 
BUCHAREST 00000764  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
modest results.  Antonescu's platform largely skirts the 
infrastructure investment issue, preferring to focus on lower taxes 
instead.  Basescu holds out hope for improvements in navigation on 
the Danube River, while Geoana promises investments in roads, rails, 
airports, and waterways. 
 
6.  (SBU) Healthcare in Romania suffers from the double drains of 
insufficient resources and widespread corruption and the candidates 
are all eager to be seen as doing something about it.  Basescu 
sponsored a blue-ribbon commission to systematically evaluate the 
system, although few of the recommendations from the 2008 report 
have yet been implemented.  He also broadly supports increased 
decentralization of Romania's vertically integrated and 
state-controlled health system.  Antonescu, looking for the rural 
vote, says that access should be expanded in rural areas, but offers 
few concrete plans.  Geoana would look to the government to diminish 
health disparities in disadvantaged populations, curb pharmaceutical 
prices, increase medical salaries, and modernize facilities. 
However, with Romania currently devoting less than four percent of 
GDP to healthcare, compared to an average of eight percent in the 
rest of the EU, real improvements will require a major infusion of 
resources in addition to administrative reforms. 
 
7.  (SBU) The recent decision by the IMF, European Commission, and 
World Bank to postpone their review of Romanian compliance until a 
new government is in place has lobbed a live grenade into the midst 
of the campaign.  With the next funding tranches from these 
institutions now delayed, all of the main candidates are engaged in 
vigorous finger-pointing in an effort to deflect blame.  Both 
Basescu and Geoana acknowledge the importance of meeting the IMF's 
criteria, and the PSD has supported efforts in Parliament to allow 
the lame-duck PDL Government to submit a budget.  However, with the 
Parliament scheduled to take two weeks of unpaid leave as a "budget 
saving" measure starting next week, nothing is likely to happen 
until after the election.  While the PNL has traditionally been the 
most hostile to deals with the IMF, Antonescu has promised his 
party's support for the prior actions needed to keep the program on 
track.  Whoever is elected president will be under pressure to name 
a prime minister and work to pass a 2010 budget quickly so as not to 
prolong delays in disbursements under Romania's IMF-led loan 
agreement. 
 
8.  (SBU) Comment:  While the voters' deep economic concerns are 
inescapable in this campaign, the fact remains that the President 
has very little direct ability to improve the economy.  This is 
little consolation for the incumbent Basescu, who is hurt by 
association with the unimpressive record of Emil Boc's PDL-led 
government.  The true test will be whether whoever is elected 
actually nominates a prime minister with a credible economic plan 
and a pragmatic approach to following the IMF program and bringing 
Romania out of the current recession.  Just like one year ago, when 
the parties were showering goodies on everyone during the 
parliamentary election campaign even as the economy went over a 
cliff, an air of unreality pervades this campaign as well.  All the 
candidates are promising new spending as a panacea for Romania's 
multiple ills, while ignoring the stark reality that this money is 
not to be had.  In order to stay within IMF deficit targets, Romania 
will have to cut government spending by at least three percent of 
GDP -- or more than eight billion dollars -- in 2010.  That will 
still leave a deficit of nearly six percent of GDP needing to be 
financed, and growth-smothering tax increases may have to accompany 
painful spending cuts.  Not surprisingly, none of the candidates is 
saying much about that.  End Comment. 
 
GITENSTEIN