Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BERN443, SWISS CAMPAIGN AGAINST PROPOSED OFFSHORE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERN443.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BERN443 2009-10-14 12:51 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bern
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSW #0443/01 2871251
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 141251Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6122
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS BERN 000443 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR J.BUNTIN 
DEPT OF TREASURY FOR J.HARRINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ETRD EFIN SZ
SUBJECT: SWISS CAMPAIGN AGAINST PROPOSED OFFSHORE 
REINSURANCE TAX BILL 
 
1.  (SBU) SUMMARY:  The Swiss Secretariat for Economic 
Affairs (SECO) and the Swiss embassy in Washington raised 
concerns with post and USTR regarding a draft U.S. offshore 
reinsurance tax bill.  SECO argues that the draft bill if 
enacted will violate both the U.S.-Swiss Double Taxation 
Treaty and U.S. obligations under the WTO General Agreement 
on Trade in Services (GATS).  Letters to the Senate Finance 
Committee by Swiss Ambassador to the U.S. Urs Ziswiler and 
Swiss Re, Switzerland's largest reinsurer outline the 
specific arguments against the bill.  While Post cannot 
address the legal technicalities or legitimacy of the Swiss 
arguments, Post is concerned that the optics of Swiss claims 
that a US draft law will violate our existing double taxation 
agreement could have detrimental effects on the Swiss 
parliament's ratification of the recently revised double 
taxation agreement.  END SUMMARY. 
 
2.  (SBU) The Swiss Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) 
Head of Americas Division Philippe Nell raised concerns with 
post and USTR regarding draft legislation, H.R. 3424, which 
will amend the Internal Revenue Code to disallow deductions 
for excess non-taxed reinsurance premiums with respect to 
United States risks paid to affiliates.  SECO argues that the 
draft bill if enacted will violate both the US-Swiss Double 
Taxation Treaty and U.S. obligations under the WTO General 
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). 
 
3.  (U) In support of these arguments, SECO shared a letter 
from Swiss Ambassador in Washington Urs Ziswiler to the 
Senate Finance Committee in opposition to the bill. 
According to Ziswiler, the draft bill is "incompatible with 
the Double Taxation Convention between the U.S. and 
Switzerland since the proposal violates the 
non-discrimination principle stated in Article 24 of the 
Convention.  According to paragraph 2a an affiliate of a 
Swiss enterprise in the U.S. shall not be taxed more 
unfavorably than a U.S. enterprise.  Paragraph 3 indicates 
that disbursements to a resident in the other Contracting 
State shall be deductible for determining the taxable profits 
to the same extent as disbursements paid to a resident. 
Therefore, reinsurance premiums ought to be deductible for an 
insurance company that does business in the U.S. regardless 
of whether or not the recipient is a related entity as long 
as the transactions are carried out under similar conditions 
as if they were independent entities, and regardless of the 
location of this entity.  Finally, paragraph 4 states that a 
company the capital of which is wholly or partly owned or 
controlled by residents of Switzerland shall not be subjected 
to more burdensome taxation than similar U.S. companies." 
 
4.  (U) Ziswiler also writes that he is concerned "the 
proposed provisions would constitute a breach of the U.S. 
obligations under the WTO.  Art. XVII (National Treatment) of 
the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) 
provides for a national treatment obligation for all services 
for which members have undertaken specific commitments."  He 
argues that the US schedule of specific commitments provides 
for national treatment for cross-border provision of 
reinsurance services, so "conditions of operation in the U.S. 
for American and foreign companies should, in law or in fact, 
be the same."  He notes that the Swiss believe the "proposal, 
by limiting the ability of insurance companies to reinsure 
their risk portfolio with related companies abroad, is 
creating a discrimination against imported reinsurance 
services." 
 
5.  (U) In summation, Ziswiler notes that the draft proposal 
would be "detrimental to the international conduct of global 
insurance, it would enhance the cost of insurance coverage 
for U.S. consumers, it would discriminate against 
internationally operating companies, and it would conflict 
with bilateral and multilateral conventions to which the U.S. 
is a party."  Swiss Re, Switzerland's largest reinsurance 
company echoes these sentiments in their letter and notes 
that the proposed bill violates fundamental US income tax 
principles and treaties. Post can forward an electronic copy 
of Ziswiler and Swiss Re's letters to the Senate Finance 
Committee upon request. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
6.  (SBU) While Post cannot address the legal technicalities 
or legitimacy of the Swiss arguments, Post is concerned that 
the optics of Swiss claims that a US draft law will violate 
our existing double taxation agreement could have detrimental 
 
effects on the Swiss parliament's ratification of the 
recently revised double taxation agreement.  The Swiss 
Parliament is still reviewing for ratification the recent 
revisions, which expanded the agreement to include 
administrative assistance on tax evasion.  Some Swiss 
politicians and press criticized the U.S. for previously 
violating the agreement in pursuing bank account information 
from UBS outside of the administrative process.  A second 
claim of violating the agreement will likely cause political 
pundits and the press to opine that the Swiss should not 
ratify an agreement of which the U.S. continually fails to 
comply.  This could place unexpected political pressure on 
Swiss Parliamentarians to refuse ratification.  In addition, 
in a country with a public referendum process, strong press 
opinions could potentially influence public sentiment and 
result in a call for a referendum to nullify parliamentarian 
ratification of the revised double taxation agreement. 
BEYER