Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BANGKOK2597, ENVIRONMENTALISTS VERSUS INDUSTRIALISTS: THE MAP TA PHUT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BANGKOK2597.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BANGKOK2597 2009-10-09 10:01 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bangkok
VZCZCXRO6514
OO RUEHCHI RUEHCN RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHBK #2597/01 2821001
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 091001Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8574
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEAWJL/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI IMMEDIATE 7137
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 002597 
 
STATE FOR EAP/MLS, EEB, DRL 
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR BWEISEL, BKLEIN 
COMMERCE FOR EAP/MAC/OKSA FOR JKELLY 
TREASURY FOR OASIA 
SINGAPORE FOR FINATT BLEIWEIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:N/A 
TAGS: ECON EINV ELAB ETRD SENV PREL TH
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTALISTS VERSUS INDUSTRIALISTS: THE MAP TA PHUT 
DISPUTE WORSENS 
 
REF: A. BANGKOK 2555 (AMBASSADOR ENGAGES WITH DEPUTY PM) 
B. BANGKOK 1909 (AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH TRANSPORT MINISTER) 
C. BANGKOK 701 (ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS AND BUSINESSES CONCERNED) 
 
BANGKOK 00002597  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: On September 29, a Thai administrative court 
issued an injunction to halt 76 new industrial projects -- valued at 
$10 billion -- at the Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate in Thailand's 
much vaunted Eastern Seaboard Industrial Development Zone over 
allegations that the government failed to follow the environmental 
provisions of the Thai Constitution when approving the projects. 
However, implementing legislation for these constitutional 
provisions has never been finalized -- a significant legal quandary 
that the courts (and parliament) must now resolve. The 76 Map Ta 
Phut projects, including a $1.5 billion investment project of Dow 
Chemical, are now frozen in legal and bureaucratic limbo. End 
Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) Comment: Thailand is experiencing the growing pains of 
modern economic development.  Whereas industrial growth in the past 
could proceed almost unfettered for anyone willing to put in the 
money, Thai civil society has now matured to where labor, 
environmental and local community organizations have found a voice 
and the political clout to force consideration of their interests. 
Abhisit's government has a tough nut to crack -- how to balance its 
support for environmental and other activist groups with existing 
commitments made to businesses and investors. As reported in 
reftels, several U.S. businesses, including Dow and Chevron, are 
worried about previously-approved multi-billion dollar investments 
that now may be halted. The Ambassador recently raised their 
concerns directly with the Deputy Prime Minister (ref A) and the 
Transport Minister (ref B), but our advocacy efforts are more 
complicated now that the case has moved into the courts. Abhisit is 
personally leading the government's efforts to find the 
least-damaging resolution to the problem, but most analysts believe 
the longer the case drags on, the greater the damage will be -- both 
to Abhisit's government and Thailand's investment and business 
climate. End Comment. 
 
Industrial Projects Grind to a Halt 
----------------------------------- 
 
3. (SBU) On September 29, the Central Administrative Court of 
Thailand issued an injunction suspending the development of 76 new 
industrial projects -- valued at more than $10 billion -- at the Map 
Ta Phut Industrial Estate in Rayong Province, less than 150 miles 
from Bangkok.  The injunction will remain in place until the Court 
has ruled on a larger suit filed by environmental activists against 
the government, accusing eight agencies of failure to comply with 
environmental provisions in the 2007 Constitution when approving the 
Map Ta Phut projects. While the government appealed the injunction 
to the Supreme Administrative Court on October 2, environmental and 
citizen groups continue to push for the revocation of all industrial 
project approvals since August 2007 when the Constitution went into 
effect. 
 
4. (U) Article 67 of the 2007 Constitution requires that prior to 
the operation of any project or activity that "may seriously affect 
the community with respect to the quality of the environment, 
natural resources and health," the following must be completed: an 
environmental impact assessment (EIA); a health impact assessment 
(HIA); a public hearing for affected citizens; and an assessment 
from an independent environmental body consisting of private 
environmental organizations and educational institutions. 
 
5. (SBU) The implementing regulations required under Article 67 of 
the Constitution have never been finalized. While existing laws 
contain guidelines for environmental impact assessments, no such 
guidance exists for the health impact assessments, public hearings, 
or the required assessments from the yet-to-be established 
independent environmental body.  A working committee had been set up 
to draft these, but without any laws or regulations (other than the 
verbiage in the Constitution itself), questions have arisen from 
businesses over how Article 67 would affect the issuance of 
government licenses for industrial projects, such as those at Map Ta 
Phut.  In short, why should their projects be halted when they have 
done all that they can to comply with existing regulations? 
 
BANGKOK 00002597  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
Environmental groups, on the other hand, believe the projects should 
never have been given even preliminary approval. 
 
A Complicated Case Gets More Complicated 
---------------------------------------- 
 
6. (U) The September 29 ruling follows a March 2009 decision from 
the Rayong Administrative Court that declared the Map Ta Phut 
Industrial Estate and the surrounding area a "pollution control 
area" per the 1992 National Environmental Quality Act (ref C).  As a 
pollution control area, more stringent environmental standards 
should be applied by the National Environment Board. The government 
chose not to appeal this decision and instead required that the 
companies submit pollution-control action plans to the National 
Environment Board within 120 days. The affected companies completed 
these plans in order to comply with the ruling and hoped that the 
proposed plans would satisfy the government's requirements and 
enable them to move forward with their new projects and expansions. 
 
7. (U) However, environmental and citizen groups in Map Ta Phut 
filed additional lawsuits in June, accusing eight government 
agencies of violating the Article 67 provisions of the 2007 
Constitution and calling for an injunction order to halt the 
continuation of the new Map Ta Phut projects, many of which are now 
underway. Since the National Environment Board designated Map Ta 
Phut as a pollution control area, the lawyers argued that Article 67 
of the Constitution must apply, as these projects "may seriously 
affect the community with respect to the quality of the environment, 
natural resources and health." 
 
8. (SBU) In an attempt to resolve the government's predicament and 
address mounting investor concerns, the Council of State decreed in 
August that that government could approve industrial projects that 
had existing environmental impact assessments -- even though these 
assessments were completed pursuant to laws and regulations 
predating the 2007 Constitution. For projects with pending 
assessments, the government would need to abide by the 2007 
constitutional requirements and follow the (yet-to-be-drafted) 
regulations regarding health impacts before issuing an operation or 
construction permit. 
 
9. (SBU) The September 29 court injunction was an unexpected 
development, however, that suspended the activities at the 76 
projects, even if the government had already approved the 
environmental impact assessments. While the government awaits a 
decision on its appeal of the injuction, Prime Minister Abhisit 
hopes to push through the necessary legislation required to 
implement the Article 67 provisions -- something that could take 
many months. 
 
ENTWISTLE