Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09AITTAIPEI1268, MEDIA REACTION: U.S. BEEF IMPORTS TO TAIWAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09AITTAIPEI1268.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09AITTAIPEI1268 2009-10-28 10:00 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #1268/01 3011000
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281000Z OCT 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2553
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9453
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0868
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001268 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/P, EAP/PD - THOMAS HAMM 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S. BEEF IMPORTS TO TAIWAN 
 
1. Summary:  On October 28, the Taiwan government's decision to open 
its market to U.S. beef continued to receive extensive coverage in 
Taiwan's print media.  Major Chinese-language and English-language 
dailies reported that dozens of trade organizations and hundreds of 
stores and restaurants in Taipei and other cities have signed up for 
an alliance launched by Taipei City Mayor Hau Lung-bin to reject the 
sale of U.S. beef offal, ground beef and spinal cords.  All these 
major papers also reported on the remarks by AIT Director William 
Stanton Tuesday defending the safety of U.S. beef.  The KMT-leaning 
"China Times" ran a banner headline on page four regarding the 
results of its latest opinion survey, reading "Beef Offal Storm: 72 
Percent [of Those Polled] Criticize the United States as Tyrannical; 
Ma's Approval Rating Drops Suddenly by 14 Percent." 
 
2. All the major dailies carried editorials and op-ed pieces on U.S. 
beef imports.  Two separate columns in the mass-circulation "Apple 
Daily" severely criticized the Ma administration's "horrible" 
decision-making model and "absurd" argument in allowing the import 
of U.S. beef and offal.  A column in the pro-unification "United 
Daily News" said the United States will surely "lose a lot by just 
trying to gain a little" on the beef issue.  A "United Daily News" 
editorial discussed U.S. beef imports and criticized the Ma 
administration's handling of the issue.  An op-ed in the 
KMT-leaning, China-focused "Want Daily" expressed concern about the 
Taiwan government's "spineless" position in the face of U.S. 
pressure.  End summary. 
 
A) "Negotiations That Cost One to Lose One's Pants" 
 
Columnist Antonio Chiang wrote in the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" 
[circulation: 520,000] (10/28): 
 
"... The [Taiwan] Presidential Office, in an attempt to mislead the 
public and solicit sympathy, put out words to imply that [the 
decision on U.S.] beef imports is related to [Taiwan's joining] the 
visa-waiver program and the signing of a Taiwan-U.S. Trade and 
Investment [Framework] Agreement.  In reality, however, these are 
two separate issues.  There are objective criteria for getting the 
visa-waiver treatment, including the rates of [people] violating the 
relevant visa regulations and committing crimes in the United 
States.  Taiwan has yet to meet all these criteria, so there is no 
way [it can be included in the visa-waiver program] no matter how 
much beef it imports.  Talks over a Taiwan-U.S. Trade and Investment 
[Framework] Agreement have been going on for many years, which 
involves [many] complicated issues.  [The attempt to] link the 
agreement with [U.S.] beef is nothing but an excuse for 
self-rationalization. 
 
"Some people claim that Taiwan's economy must not rely too heavily 
on mainland China, and that by allowing the import of U.S. beef it 
can help to balance the triangular relationship between Taiwan, the 
United States and China and prevent [Taiwan] from tilting overly 
toward mainland China.  Such arguments are akin to putting the cart 
before the horse and are totally nonsensical. ...  The talks with 
the Americans over [U.S.] beef have caused Taiwan to lose its pants. 
 Taiwan may lose more than its pants if the same bunch of people 
talk with Beijing over the [signing of] the Economic Cooperation 
Framework Agreement." 
 
B) "A Horrible Decision-making Model" 
 
The "Spicy Apple" column in the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" 
[circulation: 520,000] (10/28): 
 
"... It is true that the Ma administration has suffered pressure 
from the United States to open [its market to U.S. beef].  It is 
also true that Taiwan cannot live without the United States as its 
friend.  But the question is: True, this is the [unfavorable] 
position that Taiwan is in; but did the Ma administration intend to 
tell its people that its decision-making model is to not appeal to 
public opinion?  Perhaps the Ma administration has forgotten that 
public opinion is the strongest buttress when facing a predicament. 
Taiwan's legislative body may not enjoy a very good image, but when 
it comes to [Taiwan's] policy towards U.S. beef, a legislative body 
that is well-known for its fist-fighting and causing trouble may be 
the best weapon that [Taiwan] can wield.  Even the mayor of 
[Taiwan's] capital city has taken the lead to express opposition [to 
the U.S. beef imports], with the restaurant owners following suit -- 
this is public opinion. 
 
"The United States is a democracy, and it has to take Taiwan's 
public opinion seriously when negotiating [with the island].  [We] 
can hardly imagine that the Ma administration, to everyone's 
surprise, has cast the handy and effective tool of public opinion 
aside and just quietly come to a decision to open [Taiwan's market] 
to U.S. beef. ..." 
 
C) "U.S. Beef vs. Taiwan People" 
 
The "Short Commentary" column in the pro-unification "United Daily 
News" [circulation: 40,000] (10/28): 
 
"... The United States is a typical Western cowboy.  The European 
Union and South Korea have all opened their markets to U.S. bone-in 
beef under U.S. pressure.  It goes without saying that Taiwan cannot 
be allowed to stand alone and act differently.  Our government, in 
consideration of Taiwan's overall national interests, actually has 
its difficulties and thus has no alternative but to open its market 
[to U.S. beef].  Export-oriented Taiwan may lose its advantage if 
the United States decides to play tough by imposing trade sanctions 
[against the island].  Nonetheless, the United States has the power 
to force the Taiwan government to yield, but it cannot force the 
Taiwan people to open their mouths.  As long as we refuse to eat 
[U.S. beef], there is nothing the Americans can do. ... 
 
"U.S. beef [imports] this time is akin to repeating the mistake of 
the [U.S.] turkey [years ago], and it has aroused the Taiwan 
people's aversion even before it has been imported.  What is even 
worse is the shadow of [contracting] mad cow disease.  How can such 
negative products enjoy high sales in the market? ...  Frankly 
speaking, for the U.S. beef issue, the United States will surely 
lose a lot by trying to gain a little.  U.S. beef steaks are usually 
expensive and delicious, and are very popular [in Taiwan].  But once 
it is contaminated by the beef offal, perhaps few would dare to eat 
U.S. steaks.  Are these smart trade talks?" 
 
D) "U.S. Beef Issue: Hau Lung-bin and McDonalds" 
 
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 40,000] 
editorialized (10/28): 
 
"Two developments in the U.S. beef issue are quite enlightening: 
one is the 'self-management alliance' launched by [Taipei Mayor] Hau 
Lung-bin, and the other is businesses like McDonalds starting to 
declare that they will not use U.S. beef.  Hau has grasped the 
essence of 'politics of the common people,' while McDonalds is 
astute about the secrets of 'economics for the common people.'  By 
contrast, the practices of the Ma administration were akin to 
turning itself into the public enemy of the 'common people politics' 
and 'common people economics.'  Who would have thought [such a 
development would happen]? ..." 
 
E) "Deep Concerns over the Import of U.S. Beef" 
 
Wu Rong-yuan, convener of the Preparatory Committee for the Forum on 
Cross-Strait Peaceful Development, opined in the KMT-leaning, 
China-focused "Want Daily" [circulation: 10,000] (10/28): 
 
"... Sources said that the U.S. side has used the Trade and 
Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) and the so-called arms sales 
for 'balanced defense' as its bargaining chips to coerce and lure 
Taiwan to yield [in the beef talks].  These are the means that the 
United States has habitually used, so they are not at all 
surprising.  The question lies after all in the [Taiwan] 
government's criteria in making its policy and its policy direction. 
 Taiwan's [decision to] fully open itself to U.S. beef simply 
reflected the island's long-standing reliance on the United States. 
Given the [Taiwan] government's spineless position where it forfeits 
its own principles in the face of the United States, one cannot help 
but wonder when it comes to the development of cross-Strait 
relations, whether the progress in peaceful development across the 
Strait, made with great difficulties via the '1992 consensus,' will 
be jeopardized by the United States' strategic interference of 
'using Taiwan to restrain China?' ..." 
 
STANTON