Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09AITTAIPEI1263, MEDIA REACTION: U.S. BEEF IMPORTS TO TAIWAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09AITTAIPEI1263.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09AITTAIPEI1263 2009-10-27 09:13 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #1263/01 3000913
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 270913Z OCT 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2544
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9451
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0865
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001263 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/P, EAP/PD - THOMAS HAMM 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S. BEEF IMPORTS TO TAIWAN 
 
Summary:  On October 27, as the controversy revolving around the 
Taiwan government's decision to open its market to U.S. beef 
continued to stay in the spotlight of the Taiwan media, news 
coverage also focused on the prosecutors' investigation into 
allegations of game fixing during the 2009 regular season of 
Taiwan's professional baseball league.  In terms of editorials and 
commentaries, an editorial in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" 
lambasted the Ma administration for its opaque and arbitrary 
decision-making process in allowing the import of U.S. ground beef 
and offal.  An editorial in the KMT-leaning "China Times" also 
criticized Taiwan's central government for its unclear 
decision-making process when opening Taiwan's market to U.S. beef. 
An editorial in the pro-unification, economic-oriented "Economic 
Daily News," however, said Taiwan has gained a lot by using U.S. 
beef imports in exchange for talks on a Trade and Investment 
Framework Agreement (TIFA) with the United States.  An editorial in 
the conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" 
also urged the public not to worry about the safety of U.S. beef. 
End summary. 
 
A) "[The Ma Ying-jeou Administration] Cannot Even Settle a Cow, What 
[Ability] Does It Have to Talk about an Economic Cooperation 
Framework Agreement?" 
 
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 680,000] 
editorialized (10/27): 
 
"... In fact, the storm caused by the invasion of [U.S.] ground beef 
and offal was not a single case.  First, it concretely and precisely 
reflected the Ma administration's consistent black-box 
[decision-making] procedures and its blind spots since Ma assumed 
office. ...  Second, in terms of negotiating strategies, when a 
small country engages with a big country in negotiations and 
maneuvers, the number of its bargaining chips is relative and not 
absolute; the government [of the small country] should take 
advantage of all its mechanisms and conditions as a strong buttress 
when it deals with other countries. ...  When it comes to the 
[import of] U.S. beef this time, which 'forfeits [Taiwan's] 
sovereignty and humiliates our nation,' the Legislative Yuan had 
reached a resolution in 2006, which said it required congressional 
consent to open [Taiwan's market to U.S. beef].  The Ma 
administration is particularly unforgivable in the way that it has 
not only openly cast away this ready-made weapon, but has also 
arbitrarily kept the KMT legislators in the dark. 
 
"Third, judging from the perspective of the art of negotiation, 
reaching an agreement is a process of give and take.  If both sides 
find [the terms] unsatisfactory but grudgingly acceptable, they can 
reach a consensus, shake hands and sign the deal.  The Ma 
administration, amid the calls of surprise by the Taiwan people, 
suddenly decided to open Taiwan's market fully to U.S. beef by 
giving up its weapons and fleeing in a rout; what kind of equivalent 
commitments or promises has it got from the United States in return 
after all?  [All we see] as of now is nothing but a blank check. 
Some foreign affairs officers revealed that the U.S. side mentioned 
at the negotiating table that '[the U.S. beef imports] would affect 
the progress of Taiwan-U.S. Trade and Investment Framework Agreement 
(TIFA) talks.'  Should such remarks prove to be true, it already 
constitutes some kind of intimidation and threat and is not a 
quid-pro-quo at all. ... The Taiwan-U.S. beef talks this time have 
resulted in making the prion protein, which endangers people's 
physical and mental health, a ticking bomb that may go off any time. 
 What is the Ma administration planning to sell out next time when 
Taiwan and China hold the talks on the Economic Cooperation 
Framework Agreement?..." 
 
B) "U.S. Beef vs. Independent Management by the Common People" 
 
The KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 120,000] editorialized 
(10/27): 
 
"... One does not need [Taiwan] officials to put on a show to bet 
their lives by eating T-bone steak and drinking beef offal soup to 
guarantee to the public whether U.S. beef is safe to eat.  What the 
government should do is [to find out] if we have actually gone to 
the United States to examine U.S. beef when the first batch of U.S. 
beef is about to be imported into Taiwan?  In terms of the many more 
imported [beef] products in the future, the government should demand 
that the United States establish a food production traceability 
system, providing us with as much information as possible in terms 
of every step starting from cattle raising, slaughter, packing and 
labeling, so that the hesitant residents standing in front of the 
beef vendors can make their choice. 
 
"But up until now, except for the empty remarks by the Department of 
Health regarding imposing strict examinations [of U.S. beef] and 
irregular inspections in the United States, we have yet to see any 
concrete moves [from the government].  The central government has 
lost its ability to function, but what is fortunate is that the 
 
local governments and private sectors have taken the initiative to 
fill in [for the central government].  Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin 
fired the first shot by saying that he will work with restaurant 
owners and beef importers to declare that they will never use U.S. 
beef offal and ground beef.  Also, [Hau] said he would see it as a 
top priority to check on and control the lunches for the primary 
students, a matter of high sensitivity to the parents all over the 
country.  His call has won immediate echoes from the leaders of 
Taichung City and Kaohsiung City and County.  In the face of the 
threats posed by the mad cow disease, the reaction and practices of 
the local governments are obviously closer to the public opinion 
when compared with the central government which stresses 'economy 
for the common people.' ..." 
 
C) "How Much Should Taiwan Sacrifice for Trade and Economic 
Liberation" 
 
The pro-unification "Economic Daily News" [circulation: 150,000] 
editorialized (10/27): 
 
"The public has grown indignant in the face of the [government's 
decision to] open the [Taiwan market to] imports of U.S. bone-in 
beef, offal and ground beef; they even lambasted [the government's 
decision] by saying that the decision has forfeited Taiwan's 
sovereignty, humiliated our nation in total disregard of the lives 
of the Taiwan people.  But after a few days of settling and sinking 
in, the inside story has gradually emerged: the decision was a 
sacrifice made in pain to request that the United States agree to 
sign a Trade and Investment Agreement [TIFA] with Taiwan. ... 
 
"[When it comes to the beef deal,] it was just some U.S. ground beef 
and offal and there are very few cases of mad cow disease as of now, 
not to mention we can make the [beef imports] more transparent and 
restrain its spread by using the power of the market.  In 
comparison, the beneficial effects [for Taiwan] of getting the TIFA 
from the United States and using it as a breakthrough for [Taiwan] 
to establish free trade and economic relations with other economic 
regions are far too great.  It cannot be viewed as a sacrifice at 
all. ..." 
 
D) "Don't Be Mad, Please" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" 
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (10/27): 
 
"... For one thing, the protocol isn't an unequal treaty.  It wasn't 
forced upon Taiwan by the American Institute in Taiwan.  The 
representative of the MoD negotiated with her American counterpart 
on an equal footing.  Of course, opponents may pick faults, accusing 
her of failing to protect Taiwan's public health against an 
onslaught of mad cow disease. But the fact is that there won't be 
any BSE invasion.  Specified risk materials are placed under special 
control. ...  We wish to call on our public health-conscious 
legislators not to worry.  Their taking the administration to task 
is already more than enough warning to even 'beef-eaters' -- not the 
yeomen of the Tower of London -- not to risk a one-in-a-million 
chance of getting mad cow disease by going to chic steak houses to 
order a fat T-bone steak for dinner ... 
 
"On the other hand, we are certain that the opposition is just 
opposing for opposition's sake.  Democratic Progressive Party 
leaders, from its chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen on down, are more than 
happy to seize what they believe is a golden opportunity to 
embarrass President Ma Ying-jeou.  Had the protocol been signed 
while President Chen Shui-bian was in office, no one in the current 
opposition would have raised any objections.  Remember Chen recently 
described himself as an agent of the U.S. military government on 
Taiwan who had to take orders from the AIT in Taiwan?  Please also 
remember what the United States has done to help Taiwan become what 
it is now.  Without its help, there would be no Republic of China on 
Taiwan.  There would never have been any economic takeoff that 
created many steak lovers here in the first place.  The United 
States is the only country in the world that may come to our help if 
and when hostilities break out across the Taiwan Street.  Taiwan 
owes Uncle Sam so much that it should accept this benign protocol 
that opponents have wrongfully described as treaty that humiliates 
the country, willingly." 
 
STANTON