Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BUENOSAIRES982, ARGENTINA: SUPREME COURT RULES FOR LIMITED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BUENOSAIRES982.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BUENOSAIRES982 2009-08-28 18:30 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Buenos Aires
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBU #0982/01 2401830
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281830Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4284
INFO RUCNMER/MERCOSUR COLLECTIVE
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 1922
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO 1160
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 2553
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ AUG CARACAS 1979
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS BUENOS AIRES 000982 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/BSC AND INL/LP HOOKER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SNAR PREL KCRIM PGOV AR
SUBJECT: ARGENTINA: SUPREME COURT RULES FOR LIMITED 
DECRIMINALIZATION OF NARCOTICS FOR PERSONAL USE 
 
REF: Buenos Aires 0811 
 
1. (U) Summary: As anticipated for many months (reftel), the 
Argentine Supreme Court ruled August 25 against criminal penalties 
for the personal possession of marijuana in a case involving five 
young adults arrested with marijuana cigarettes in 2006.  The court 
ruling appears to open the door to decriminalization of personal 
possession of other drugs as well.  The justices restricted 
decriminalization to cases involving small amounts, in which no 
third party is harmed, and in which the possession occurs in a 
private place.  They called on the Government to make changes along 
these lines to national drug laws and also to increase resources for 
treatment and for fighting traffickers.  Reaction by the church, 
center-right political leaders, some pro-government provincial 
leaders, and several commentators was critical, focusing on the 
negative message the decision would send to youth and on the 
difficulties it might cause for law enforcement efforts against 
traffickers.  Within Government, moreover, there remain concerns 
about the effects of decriminalization.  End Summary. 
 
2. (U) As had been long anticipated based on statements to the press 
by individual Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court ruled August 
25, in a unanimous seven vote decision, to acquit five young adults 
arrested in 2006 after purchasing marijuana cigarettes from dealers. 
 (Note: In 2008, a lower court upheld the convictions of the three 
dealers also arrested in the case.  The Supreme Court ruling did not 
touch their convictions, signaling that the GOA continues to 
prosecute dealers and traffickers. End Note)  The ruling, if applied 
broadly, may decriminalize personal possession of any narcotic (not 
only marijuana) in cases where the use is private and individual and 
where no third parties are harmed.  (Note: Precedent in the 
Argentine legal system is not as clearly defined as it is in the 
United States, and cases involving other drugs may have to be 
considered individually by lower courts and then again by the 
Supreme Court.  End Note) 
 
3. (U) In explaining the ruling, Court President Lorenzetti went far 
in marking a sphere of personal freedom from state authority, saying 
that the Court recognized that "every adult is sovereign to take 
free decisions about the way in which they live."  The Justices 
pointed to Article 19 of the Argentine Constitution, guaranteeing 
personal liberties, to support the ruling.  Justice Carlos Fayt 
emphasized his view that the ruling indicated that the solution to 
drug abuse lay through treatment rather than sanctions, while 
Justice Raul Zaffaroni gave attention to an "enormous expense of 
effort, time and money by law enforcement against insignificant" 
cases of possession.  Justice Enrique Petracchi and others called on 
the state to increase efforts against traffickers and to find 
additional resources for prevention and treatment of addiction. 
 
 
4. (U) The justices spoke in broad terms against the current drug 
law's emphasis, in its application, on small consumers.  Ninety 
percent of narcotics cases, they said, had been brought against 
small-time users, leading to stigmatization and unjustified 
inconveniences against those arrested.  Still, the justices 
emphasized that to be "not punishable," any use and possession had 
to be private and of a small quantity.  Justices Fayt and Carmen 
Argibay further emphasized that the possession could not be 
"ostentatious, that is to say, that the individual has not exhibited 
the drug." 
 
Precedent and Application 
------------------------- 
 
5. (SBU) GOA officials, particularly Cabinet Chief Fernandez, have 
long made clear their intention to send Congress a legislative 
proposal to decriminalize possession of small quantities, and this 
court ruling appears to give further impetus to that.  At present, 
the draft legislation is being developed by a commission of experts 
organized by the executive, prior to submission to the Congress. 
Until drug laws are changed, police will still be expected to arrest 
anyone possessing marijuana or other drugs.  Only judges can make a 
determination to dismiss a specific case based on the Supreme 
Court's ruling and arguments.  The Supreme Court's ruling, however, 
does appear to apply to drugs other than marijuana, so the ruling 
may be quickly challenged or built on in other cases.  The ruling 
may also have an effect on the willingness of law enforcement to 
 
make arrests in cases involving small amounts of possession.  One 
citizen quoted in the press pointed to an upside of that, saying 
that police officers would request fewer bribes. 
 
Supporters and Critics React 
---------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) The Government's Chief of Cabinet Anibal Fernandez, a vocal 
proponent of decriminalization during his previous tenure as 
Minister of Justice, Security and Human Rights, praised the court 
decision and reemphasized the GOA's intention to fight trafficking. 
"It is along the lines of what we have been urging," he said, 
"reversing the repressive policies applied by Nixon and then adapted 
with such enthusiasm by Lopez Rega" [an Argentine Minister of Social 
Welfare in the early seventies blamed for a variety of human rights 
abuses], "policies that have not succeeded in reducing cultivation 
or consumption, not even by a bit, anywhere in the world."  Op-Ed 
columnists supporting the Government's position echoed the Court's 
statements, saying the country would be better served by an emphasis 
on prevention, treatment and law enforcement efforts against 
trafficking organizations. 
 
7. (SBU) The new Minister of Justice, Security and Human Rights, 
Julio Alak, asked the CDA in an August 27 pull-aside what he thought 
the impact of decriminalization might be.  Alak said that he would 
be interested in any studies showing effects on consumption of 
decriminalization measures in other countries.  He also requested 
information on how small possession offenses are dealt with in the 
United States.  (Note: Members of post's Law Enforcement Working 
Group have begun gathering information along these lines to share 
with the Minister; post welcomes additional materials, particularly 
Spanish-language documents.  End Note) 
 
8. (SBU) Critics of the measure included the Catholic Church's 
Pastoral Commission on Addictions led by Bishop Jorge Lozano. 
Lozano said that while the Commission understood the reasons behind 
the decision, the country would not overcome the "tragedy of drug 
abuse, particularly among youth and adolescents," by "facilitating 
consumption and by making something that is bad appear to be 
acceptable." He focused on the impact in poorer neighborhoods, 
arguing that youth would be less reluctant to try marijuana, which 
could lead to harder drugs and/or addiction.  Another critic, the 
presidentially-appointed head of the National Commission for Drug 
Treatment and Prevention (SEDRONAR), Jose Granero, also dissented, 
arguing that the ruling implied it "was OK to use drugs." 
 
9. Buenos Aires Mayor Mauricio Macri, of the opposition center-right 
PRO party, called the Supreme Court's decision an "error."  He 
linked his critique to the popular concern over rising crime, saying 
that drug use was "intimately tied" to delinquency and crime. 
Another PRO party leader, national Deputy Eugenio Burzaco, argued 
that the decision would diminish law enforcement efforts against 
trafficking because most sales occurred in small quantities and the 
ruling would make it hard to address these transactions. 
 
10. (U) Prominent Union-Pro Deputy Elect Francisco de Narvaez said 
that the ruling would aid traffickers, arguing that "many countries 
that have taken this step have had to reverse it later because it 
promoted consumption, insecurity, and violence."  His Congressional 
ticket-mate Felipe Sola said that Argentina was "not prepared" to 
manage a decriminalization regimen and that the Justices were not 
living in the real Argentina, the "conurbana" of poorer suburbs 
surrounding Buenos Aires.  From beyond Buenos Aires, reaction 
appeared to be mixed but mostly critical, with even some nominally 
pro-Kirchner figures like Tucuman Governor Alperovich calling the 
decision ill-advised and likely to lead to more consumption. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
11. (SBU) While GOA leaders and the Supreme Court make a valid 
argument over the lack of sufficient resources in Argentina to help 
drug addicts, it is not clear that the Supreme Court's ruling will 
elicit any real increase in attention to this deficit.  In the 
meantime, the country will face new law enforcement challenges in 
addressing rapidly rising consumption (reftel).  We are not 
concerned that the ruling will diminish our important bilateral 
collaboration against drug trafficking and will make this plain if 
 
asked by press.  At the same time, however, the ruling's potential 
impact on local demand warrants attention, as does the government's 
response in terms of improving its prevention and treatment record. 
The request for more information from the Justice Minister gives us 
an excellent opportunity to share our views on the subject with a 
key GOA decision-maker. 
 
Kelly