Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09ADDISABABA2065, GOE PASSES RESTRICTIVE BIOSAFETY LAW, BUT IS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09ADDISABABA2065.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09ADDISABABA2065 2009-08-25 08:13 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Addis Ababa
VZCZCXRO0316
PP RUEHROV
DE RUEHDS #2065/01 2370813
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 250813Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5984
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ADDIS ABABA 002065 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EEB/TPP/ABT JACK BOBO 
PASS TO USAID FOR JOSETTE LEWIS, LARRY BEACH, SAHARAH MOON 
CHAPOTIN 
ALSO USTR FOR PATRICK COLEMAN 
DEPT OF COMMERCE FOR ITA MARIA RIVERO 
NAIROBI FOR FCS AND FAS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: TBIO SENV EAGR ETRD EAID ET
SUBJECT: GOE PASSES RESTRICTIVE BIOSAFETY LAW, BUT IS 
INTERESTED IN BT COTTON 
 
REF: ADDIS ABABA 1389 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) Ethiopia recently enacted highly restrictive 
biosafety legislation that could significantly impact the 
importation of bioengineered seeds, food commodities, and 
processed foods.  Ethiopia's Environmental Protection 
Authority (EPA) is admittedly unprepared to implement the new 
legislation, owing to a lack of laboratory facilities, 
technical expertise, and manpower.  Although the EPA's 
leadership is ideologically opposed to the use of 
bioengineered crops, the EPA will likely be pressured to 
approve trials of such crops where they could promote growth 
in key export sectors, namely cotton.  End summary. 
 
BIOSAFETY LAW RESTRICTIVE, FAR-REACHING 
--------------------------------------- 
 
2. (U) The Ethiopian parliament recently passed highly 
restrictive biosafety legislation, establishing broader and 
more stringent controls than are called for under the 
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.  The stated objective of the 
Biosafety Proclamation of 2009 is to protect biodiversity, as 
well as human and animal health, from "the adverse effects of 
modified organisms."  The law grants the EPA the power to 
regulate the making or use of any "modified organism" in 
"teaching, research, production, import, export, transit, 
release, contained production, transport, placing on the 
market, or use as pharmaceutical, as food, as feed, or for 
processing."  It makes no distinction between living 
organisms and products that are not capable of reproducing 
(e.g., processed foods), or between transgenic organisms and 
bioengineered organisms that do not contain genetic material 
from another species.  The law also prohibits the use of the 
phrase "may contain modified organisms," requiring instead a 
declaration that a product either does or does not contain 
modified organisms. 
 
3. (SBU) In a public statement, EPA Director General Dr. 
Tewolde Berhan Gebregziabhere described the Biosafety 
Proclamation as "based on the international biosafety law 
(i.e., the Cartagena Protocol), with local characteristics." 
Wondwossen Sintayehu, EPA Director of Environmental Law and 
Policy, told EconOff that Dr. Tewolde was the driving force 
behind the new law, and that the bill he initially proposed 
was even more restrictive than the resulting legislation. 
(Note:  Dr. Tewolde previously represented African nations 
during negotiations on the Cartagena Protocol, where he 
opposed the use of bioengineered crops in developing nations. 
 End note.)   Gebremedhin Birega, Director of the Eco 
Consumer Association, an environmental group that lobbied for 
the bill, separately told EconOff that the Ethiopian 
government's (GoE) Environmental Council (which drafted the 
bill and is comprised mainly of GoE officials) is largely 
opposed to the importation of bioengineered organisms, but 
was wary of appearing "anti-science" when drafting the new 
law. 
 
EPA HAS LIMITED IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY 
--------------------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) The legislation, which has already entered into 
force, requires the EPA to approve or deny all applications 
for the use of modified organisms in Ethiopia, and further 
requires the EPA to establish a National Biosafety 
Clearing-House to study bioengineering and assist the EPA in 
making its decisions.  According to the EPA's Wondwossen, 
while the EPA "must now process applications, legally 
speaking," it is not capable of doing so.  Only two EPA 
employees currently specialize in biosafety, and Wondwossen 
stated that there are currently no facilities in Ethiopia 
that meet the standards for studying or conducting trials of 
modified organisms that are set forth in the draft 
implementing regulations.  Wondwossen described 
implementation of these regulations as "very problematic," 
and explained that in order to be approved, an applicant 
would be required "to prove to us (the EPA) that there is no 
risk" to biodiversity or to human or animal health from the 
bioengineered product.  He further noted that while the law 
does not distinguish between food products and non-edible 
 
ADDIS ABAB 00002065  002 OF 002 
 
 
goods, the EPA would scrutinize food products more closely. 
 
5. (SBU) Gebremedhin, of the Eco Consumer Association, voiced 
similar concerns over implementation to EconOff.  He 
predicted that the GoE would begin restricting the 
importation of bioengineered foods, in particular, but 
posited that without laboratories, biosafety expertise, and 
sufficient manpower, the EPA would not likely be able to 
review applications thoroughly.  He further suggested that 
where sufficient political will exists to import 
bioengineered crops (such as those which could boost 
Ethiopia's export sectors), applications would be approved 
without proper study.  Negusu Aklilu, Director of Forum for 
the Environment (FfE), a civil society organization that sits 
on the GoE's Environmental Council, told EconOff that 
finished products were not a concern to the GoE, but 
predicted the EPA would scrutinize living modified organisms 
(LMOs) more closely. 
 
STRONG INTEREST IN BT COTTON 
---------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) Both Gebremedhin and Negusu told EconOff that the 
GoE was strongly interested in importing transgenic Bacillus 
thuringiensis (BT) cotton seeds in an effort to boost 
Ethiopia's nascent textile sector (reftel).  They cited this 
interest as a major factor in the passage of the Biosafety 
Proclamation, and predicted that given the political will to 
boost textile production, any application to import BT cotton 
would be approved.  According to Negusu, the Tendaho cotton 
plantation in Afar will be the site of early trials.  Earlier 
this year, Dr. Tewolde publicly stated that Ethiopia would 
start trials of BT cotton within the year, and Dr. Adane 
Abraham, Coordinator of Biotechnology Research at the 
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), told 
EconOff that EIAR was keenly interested in promoting trials 
of BT cotton, and had been in contact with U.S. agribusiness 
firm Monsanto in that regard. 
 
IMPACT ON IMPORTED FOOD AID 
--------------------------- 
 
7. (SBU)  The majority of U.S. food aid to Ethiopia is wheat 
and sorghum, which are not "modified organisms."  Based on a 
common understanding with the GoE, the U.S. and World Food 
Program (WFP) provide only milled (non-viable) maize and soy 
to Ethiopia, rather than (viable) maize and soy grains.  It 
has been understood that any request for duty free entry of 
whole maize grain or soybeans as food aid would be rejected, 
so the U.S. and WFP have conformed to this understanding and 
not attempted to import whole grains.  (Note:  This practice 
is endorsed by Dr. Tewolde, and the EPA's Wondwossen reported 
that he unsuccessfully attempted to include a requirement 
that any bioengineered relief food be milled or roasted prior 
to entry into Ethiopia in the biosafety law.  End note.) 
Nevertheless, because the law does not distinguish between 
living organisms and processed foods, the new requirement to 
obtain informed consent and provide a risk assessment may 
pose new obstacles to the provision of food aid containing 
bioengineered material, even in trace amounts. 
USAID/Ethiopia is developing a plan to provide capacity 
building to the EPA, and believes a positive intervention can 
be achieved through USAID's Program for Biosafety Systems 
(PBS), which has successfully supported the implementation of 
biosafety frameworks in other African countries (most notably 
the drafting and approval of Kenya's biosafety law) and has 
gained much respect in the region. 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
8. (SBU) This new biosafety law is far-reaching and highly 
restrictive, and has clearly been influenced by GoE officials 
opposed to biotechnology.  It appears that sufficient 
political will exists to begin trials of transgenic crops in 
sectors where they could promote exports - a key GoE goal. 
However, given the ideological bent of the current EPA 
leadership, it is likely that the GoE will restrict imports 
of bioengineered food and other crops that are not as closely 
tied to the GoE's development agenda.  End comment. 
MEECE