Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09DHAKA693, BANGLADESH 527 REPORT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09DHAKA693.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09DHAKA693 2009-07-16 01:03 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Dhaka
VZCZCXRO8525
PP RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW
DE RUEHKA #0693/01 1970103
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 160103Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY DHAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9160
INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJPI/PACOM IDHS HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 000693 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EB/IFD/OIA HGOETHERT AND KBUTLER, L/CID PPEARSALL 
DEPT ALSO FOR SCA/INSB 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EINV KIDE OPIC PGOV CASC BG
SUBJECT: BANGLADESH 527 REPORT 
 
REF:  STATE 49477 
 
1. (SBU) The United States Government is aware of five (5) claims of 
United States persons that may be outstanding against the Government 
of Bangladesh (GOB).  One case has been added in 2009. 
 
I. a.   Claimant A 
 
b.   1979 
 
c.   In 1977 Claimant A entered into an agreement with the GOB 
Ministry of Agriculture.  The agreement granted Claimant A a 
ten-year franchise to trap and export rhesus monkeys, with the 
obligation that Claimant A would build monkey-breeding farms in 
Bangladesh.  The dispute began in January 1979 when the GOB 
terminated the contract after alleging that Claimant A had failed to 
begin building the breeding farms as agreed. 
 
Claimant A immediately sought to resolve the dispute through direct 
discussions with Bangladesh, but those efforts failed. Claimant A 
then sought arbitration in accordance with the contract. In 1986, 
after the GOB failed to appoint an arbitrator, Claimant A appointed 
a sole arbitrator and received an arbitral award of over USD 16 
million.  Claimant A then sought to enforce the award in Bangladeshi 
courts for ten years.  In February 1996, a lower court ruled against 
Claimant A.  Claimant A appealed the lower court decision to the 
High Court. 
 
On March 14, 1999, the Bangladeshi High Court in Dhaka ruled in 
favor of Claimant A, but on November 2, 1999, the GOB filed an 
appeal in the Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court has yet to hear the 
appeal. 
 
Since the early 1980s, the U.S. Embassy has been in contact with the 
Government of Bangladesh to facilitate discussions with Claimant A. 
In 1995, the Embassy contacted the GOB to express concern that 
access to Bangladeshi courts was being denied.  After the 1996 
judgment, the U.S. Embassy again contacted the GOB to encourage 
settlement.  Since then, the Embassy has continued to monitor 
developments in the case. 
 
Claimant A's representatives met with Ministry of Agriculture 
officials during the December 2-3, 2001 U.S. Bangladesh Business 
Council's (USBBC) delegation visit to Dhaka.  Early in 2002, 
Claimant A's representatives met with GOB officials in Washington 
and expressed Claimant A's preference for resolving the matter 
amicably, but Claimant A's representatives also expressed firm plans 
to pursue all legal and political means to reach resolution. 
Claimant A followed up with calls and letters to the Bangladesh 
Embassy asking for an update on the GOB's position, but received no 
response. 
 
U.S. counsel for Claimant A met with its local attorneys in fall 
2006 in an attempt to expedite hearings on the appeal.  In June 2008 
Claimant A's attorney reported no change in the case, indicating 
that it was unlikely to be heard in the near future.  In June 2009, 
Claimant A's attorney could not be reached.  Post has not been 
approached by Claimant A since 2006. 
 
II. a. Claimant B 
 
b. 1995 
 
c. Claimant B, a U.S. citizen, borrowed USD 2.5 million from a 
Bangladeshi bank in 1989 to perform research and development, and to 
set up a factory to produce cataract lenses in Bangladesh.  Claimant 
B apparently did not make his scheduled payments, and after his 
government contact left office, an anti-corruption case was filed 
against Claimant B (in 1992).  Claimant B was arrested in 1995 and, 
after considerable U.S. Embassy effort and congressional interest, 
he was released from jail and allowed to leave Bangladesh.  Over the 
years there have been efforts to establish a reasonable payment plan 
to the bank; however Claimant B stated that his factory, which 
employed 90 people, had never made an operating profit and that in 
order to address the issue, he needs to be able to go to Bangladesh 
and run the factory without fear of arrest. 
 
A civil case against Claimant B, won by the bank for recovery of its 
funds, is on appeal and continues at an extremely slow pace.  On 
Feb. 28, 2001, the Anti-corruption court delivered a guilty verdict, 
and sentenced him to seven years in prison and a USD 4.63 million 
fine.  In order to appeal, Claimant B had to surrender himself to 
arrest and imprisonment within 60 days.  The U.S. Government has 
received no further information on the case since March 2001. 
 
III.  a. Claimant C 
 
 
DHAKA 00000693  002 OF 002 
 
 
b. 2006 
 
c. Claimant C and Petrobangla (an entity of the Government of 
Bangladesh) have been in a dispute over fees for gas pipeline usage 
since 1999.  On March 17, 2006, Claimant C filed for international 
arbitration of that dispute against GOB with ICSID, a World Bank 
body, per the terms of its contract with Petrobangla.  Petrobangla 
resisted that arbitration by pursuing a suit in a local Bangladeshi 
court; it later withdrew the lawsuit from the Bangladesh court. 
Despite this local challenge, the ICSID tribunal continued with its 
deliberations on the dispute.  The tribunal heard the dispute May 
18-19, 2009 in London.  ICSID will likely deliver its verdict by the 
end of 2009.  The Embassy remains in close contact with Claimant C. 
 
IV.  a. Claimant D 
 
b. 2007 
 
c. Claimant D represents a major U.S. hotel chain.  In 2006 Claimant 
D signed a 99-year lease with the Ministry of Communications for a 
piece of land in Dhaka, belonging to Bangladesh Railways, on which 
to build a hotel.  Environmental groups opposed the project, 
favoring instead the development of a park on the site. Soon after 
the lease was signed Bangladesh experienced a change in government. 
As the future of the site was debated, the new government withheld 
permission from Claimant E to begin construction of the hotel.  In 
December 2007 an inter-ministerial committee decided to cancel the 
lease, agreeing to find an alternate site for the hotel.  In May 
2008 the municipal government evicted Claimant E from the site.  The 
GOB has yet to offer an alternate site for the hotel, despite its 
stated desire to see the project move forward.  The Embassy has 
advocated on behalf of Claimant D with the Ministry of 
Communications, the Ministry of Law and the Ministry of Civil 
Aviation and Tourism on numerous occasions and will continue to do 
so. 
 
V.  a. Claimant E 
 
b. 2009 
 
c. Claimant E, which was founded in the United States 160 years ago, 
started operating in Bangladesh in 1990 as a joint venture with a 
Bangladesh firm.  In September 1997, what is now Claimant E became a 
100-percent foreign-owned shipping venture, following its 
registration with the Government of Bangladesh.  Since that time, 
Bangladesh Customs, a wing of the National Board of Revenue (NBR), 
has renewed every two years Claimant F's operating license as a 
100-percent foreign-owned shipping firm.  Claimant F applied to 
renew its license in 2009.  However, the renewal of Claimant E's 
license and the licenses of other 100-percent foreign-owned shipping 
companies are on hold because the Government of Bangladesh is 
considering a change to its investment policy in this sector.  The 
proposed change would require foreign-owned shipping companies to 
sell shares to local shipping firms and enter into minority joint 
ventures with the local firms. 
 
The Embassy, other diplomatic missions in Dhaka and Bangladesh 
exporters have urged the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister on 
numerous occasions not to change the investment rules in this 
sector.  In June 2009 the Prime Minister informed the Ambassador and 
the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia that 
100-percent foreign-invested firms already operating in Bangladesh 
would be permitted to continue operating as they have for the last 
decade.  NBR and Customs have thus far failed to implement this 
decision.  The Embassy continues to engage the GOB on this issue and 
remains in close contact with Claimant E. 
 
2. (SBU)  Claimant A: MOL, Inc. 
Claimant B: Dr. Rafiquzzaman 
Claimant C: Chevron 
Claimant D: Millennium Holdings, a Bangladeshi firm representing 
Hilton Hotels 
Claimant E: APL 
 
MORIARTY