Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09COLOMBO600, SRI LANKA: OIL HEDGE BACK BEFORE SUPREME COURT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09COLOMBO600.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09COLOMBO600 2009-06-09 11:29 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Colombo
VZCZCXRO4163
RR RUEHBI
DE RUEHLM #0600/01 1601129
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 091129Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0095
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3113
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 1733
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 8745
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 6979
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 2487
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 9365
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 6670
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000600 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR SCA/INSB AND EEB/IFD/OMA 
STATE PASS USTR FOR ADINA ADLER AND VICKY KADER 
TREASURY FOR SUSAN CHUN 
 
E.O 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN EINV PGOV KMCA CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA: OIL HEDGE BACK BEFORE SUPREME COURT 
 
REF: A. WITMER-ADLER-HICKS/HATCHER EMAILS (various) 
B. COLOMBO 285 
C. 08 COLOMBO 1155 
D. 08 COLOMBO 1127 
E. 08 COLOMBO 1107 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  The filing of a new fundamental rights petition 
before the Supreme Court once again calls into question the legality 
of oil hedge contracts between the Ceylon Petroleum Company (CPC) 
and several international and local banks.  The petition asserts, 
among other issues, that CPC did not have the authority to pursue 
hedging contracts, that hedging itself is illegal under Sri Lankan 
law, and that at least one international bank bribed CPC officials 
with foreign trips.   Citi, the only U.S. bank involved, is 
preparing a response to the petition in advance of the July 14 
hearing date.  Citi continues to pursue international arbitration in 
London.  End Summary. 
 
---------- 
New Case 
---------- 
 
2. (U) Following and further to similar cases last year, on July 14 
the Supreme Court will hear a new fundamental rights petition 
challenging oil hedging contracts that the state-owned enterprise 
Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) entered into in 2007 and 2008. 
The petition, which was filed by leading public interest 
activist/management consultant Nihal Amerasekara, aims to annul the 
contracts by demonstrating that the CPC did not have the legal 
authority to enter into them.  Amerasekara stated he intends to 
"prevent grave and irreparable loss, damage and detriment being 
caused to the people of the country; the people being the co-owners 
of the Consolidated Fund, including the official foreign exchange 
reserves" by filing the petition. 
 
3. (U) This new petition asserts that "a well conceived fraud had 
been committed on the state and the people of Sri Lanka" and asks 
the court to declare the hedging transactions illegal, null and 
void.  It cites the CPC, the Treasury Secretary, Controller of 
Exchange, Attorney General and five banks (Citibank, Standard 
Chartered Bank (SCB), Deutsche Bank, Commercial Bank of Ceylon, and 
Peoples Bank) as respondents.  The petition asked the court to issue 
interim orders preventing the payment of any claims by the 
government or claims being demanded by the banks under the hedge 
agreements, until the final determination of the case.  This initial 
request was not granted on June 1 when the court first reviewed the 
petition and then delayed the hearing of the case until July 14.  As 
requested by the petition, the Supreme Court directed several 
government institutions to investigate the oil hedge agreements and 
take action against wrongdoers.  The government institutions so 
directed by the petition are Controller of Exchange, the Central 
Bank, Bribery Commission, Police Criminal Investigation Department, 
and the Attorney General's Department. 
 
4.  (U) The petition argues that claims made by banks precipitated 
Sri Lanka's contingent liabilities and would therefore seriously 
impede negotiation with the IMF or other international financial 
institutions.  It states further that since governments of the 
countries of domain of the foreign banks listed in the petition have 
made available large bailout packages to financial institutions, the 
banks could seek funds from those packages to cover any losses made 
in Sri Lanka. 
 
5. (U) Key complaints in the petition: 
 
--The oil hedging agreements "though camouflagedly held out as 
'Petroleum Oil Hedging', in effect has been 'deals' in the nature of 
speculating, gambling, betting or wagering on the movement of 
petroleum oil prices, on 'notional quantities'.."  Such deals are 
unlawful and illegal in Sri Lanka. 
 
--The Chairman of the CPC did not have the statutory power to enter 
into oil hedging agreements. 
 
--There was no relationship between the purchase of oil and entering 
into hedging contracts. Hence linking the two was a misleading sham 
and deception. 
 
COLOMBO 00000600  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
--The concerned banks failed in their fiduciary duty to protect the 
interest of the customer (CPC). 
 
--The hedging agreements were flawed. While the agreements protected 
the banks by limiting their losses through caps when prices rose 
above the strike price (upper collar), there were no reciprocal caps 
on CPC payments to banks when prices fell below the floor price. 
 
--The hedging agreements did not appear to have the official seal of 
the CPC. 
 
--The respondent banks would stand liable for violation of the 
exchange control laws if they have made "back to back agreements" 
with foreign parties or remitted foreign currency under the hedging 
agreements without approval. 
 
--Payment of claims made by foreign banks in the range of $600-$800 
million would erode Sri Lanka's foreign reserves. 
 
6.  (SBU) The petition is especially critical of the Standard 
Chartered (SCB) role in the hedging deals.  It alleges that SCB 
induced the CPC and public officers connected to oil hedging to 
enter unsuspectingly into questionable deals.  It further alleges 
that SCB essentially bribed public officers with foreign trips.  The 
petition notes that investigations by law enforcement officers could 
reveal if other respondent banks have also engaged in similar acts. 
 
 
7.  (SBU) Following an initial hearing of the case on June 1, the 
Supreme Court agreed to take up the case for review on July 14 and 
ordered the respondents to file objections by July 7.  Citibank 
informed post that it submitted preliminary arguments at the June 1 
hearing and that it is Citi's intention to respond by July 7 and 
attend the July 14 hearing. 
 
-------- 
Comment 
-------- 
 
8.  (SBU) This is the third public interest petition against the oil 
hedging agreements; two previous petitions were withdrawn when the 
government failed to honor a court ruling to reduce petrol prices. 
Various ministers continue to advise post that the President wants 
to reach an amicable settlement with Citibank, rather than continue 
with international arbitration.  However, to date the GSL has done 
little to demonstrate that it is serious about this; the GSL has not 
responded to repeated Citibank requests for technical details of a 
possible settlement.  Citibank remains willing to work towards a 
negotiated settlement and has proposed several possible settlement 
options; however, it is not willing to agree to any GSL requests 
that would entail significant losses for what it considers to be a 
valid contract.  For the last several months, GSL interlocutors 
indicated a strong desire to await the retirement of the Supreme 
Court Chief Justice before finalizing the terms of any settlement. 
With the installation on June 8 of new Supreme Court Chief Justice 
Ashoka de Silva, the government may now be more ready to strike a 
deal. 
 
MOORE