Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09CAPETOWN148, N2 GATEWAY/JOE SLOVO EVICTION RULING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09CAPETOWN148.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09CAPETOWN148 2009-06-17 06:42 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Consulate Cape Town
VZCZCXRO0676
PP RUEHDU RUEHJO
DE RUEHTN #0148/01 1680642
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 170642Z JUN 09
FM AMCONSUL CAPE TOWN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3133
INFO RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 6440
RUEHUJA/AMEMBASSY ABUJA 0115
RUEHJO/AMCONSUL JOHANNESBURG 2153
RUEHDU/AMCONSUL DURBAN 3297
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CAPE TOWN 000148 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
AF/S FOR RMARBURG AND MJAMES 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV KDEM SF
SUBJECT: N2 GATEWAY/JOE SLOVO EVICTION RULING 
 
1. (U)  Summary: On June 10, 2009 the Constitutional Court upheld an 
order of the Cape High Court whereby residents of the Joe Slovo 
informal settlement would be evicted and moved to the more remote 
area of Delft in order to facilitate the building of houses as part 
of the N2 Gateway Project.  The Court, however, added that the more 
than 20, 000 residents who will be evicted must be given alternative 
housing.  End summary. 
2. (U)  The N2 Gateway Housing Project is an initiative which was 
started in March 2005 by the three tiers of government, namely the 
National Department of Housing, the Western Cape Provincial 
Government, and the City of Cape Town in an effort to provide 
low-cost housing to the poor.  All three tiers were, at the time, 
controlled by the African National Congress (ANC) and the project 
was managed by the parastatal Thubelisha Homes.  The project aimed 
to develop land on either side of the N2 Highway, but this 
necessitated the eviction of the informal settlement dwellers 
currently on the land.  It was proposed that the residents of the 
Joe Slovo settlement be relocated a considerable distance away from 
their current homes and places of employment to an area on the 
outskirts of Cape Town known as Delft.  In 2008 the Government 
obtained an eviction order in the Cape High Court against the 
residents in terms of  the Prevention of Illegal Eviction From and 
Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (PIE Act).  The residents 
appealed against this order to the Constitutional Court.  In their 
appeal, the residents argued that there was no meaningful 
consultation with them in relation to this project, specifically on 
the criteria for the allocation of housing in the new development as 
well as arrangements for their accommodation during the development 
process.  They also argued that they had the consent of the City to 
reside in the Joe Slovo Settlement, and that this consent was not 
terminated prior to eviction proceedings being implemented. 
Accordingly, they were not 'unlawful occupiers' in terms of the PIE 
Act.  Finally, they raised the unsuitability of relocating to Delft 
and the disruptive impact it would have on their employment 
situation, social support networks and the education of children. 
Argument was heard before the Constitutional Court on 21 August 2008 
and judgment was delivered on 10 June 2009 with the Court upholding 
the earlier eviction order, but insisting that Joe Slovo residents 
be given proper alternative accommodation and that 70% of the 
residents be accommodated in the future new low-cost housing 
development at the N2 Gateway. 
3. (SBU)   POL Asst spoke with representatives of the various 
political parties regarding the ruling. Garth Strachan, African 
National Congress (ANC) spokesperson for the Western Cape, said the 
ANC welcomed the ruling and regarded it as a victory for future 
housing projects undertaken by the government. He said the ANC 
accepts and respects the judicial process and the outcome of the 
case and remains committed to the N2 Gateway project.  COPE 
Communications Director, Phillip Dexter, said the court case 
highlighted a larger problem and his party was extremely concerned 
about the slow pace of delivery of essential services.  He indicated 
that if the ANC was delivering what it had promised in past 
elections there would be no need for people to illegally occupy 
land. He said his party would closely monitor ANC delivery goals and 
push for speedy delivery of essential services. He added that COPE 
Qpush for speedy delivery of essential services. He added that COPE 
would focus on these social issues and do everything in its power to 
improve the plight of the poorer communities in South Africa.  The 
Democratic Alliance (DA) MEC for Housing, Bonginkosi Madikizela, 
said that despite inheriting the project from the ANC, his party 
respected the court ruling and would honor the conditions imposed by 
the court.  (Note: The Western Cape Province is no longer in ANC 
control and is now run by the DA as a result of the April 2009 
elections.  End note.)  He said that one of the most important 
lessons the DA can take from the N2 Gateway project is to 
communicate with communities affected by development.  However, he 
warned that illegal occupation of land would not be tolerated by the 
Provincial Government. Madikizela said his party was honor-bound to 
see the N2 Gateway Project to fruition despite the controversy 
surrounding it.  He indicated that the DA has grave concerns over 
many issues surrounding the project and would try its best to find 
alternate solutions to its inherent flaws. 
4. (SBU)  The continued failure, both in Cape Town and nationally, 
of government and its designated development agents to fulfill their 
long-repeated promises of affordable formal housing for those living 
in informal settlement shacks is at the root of the Joe Slovo 
crisis, as it is throughout rural and township South Africa.  The 
housing backlog in the Western Cape is 380,000 units and worsens 
every year. The backlog increases by 18,000 units a year, while only 
10,000 houses a year are being built, often resulting in people 
spending more than twenty years on the waiting list for government 
housing. The N2 Gateway project is itself not without controversy. 
Since its launch in 2004, then-Housing Minister Lindiwe Sisulu's 
flagship project has run into numerous problems with delayed 
delivery, cost over-runs and lack of consultation. One of the major 
criticisms of the project is that it was not conceived to build 
houses or to contribute to solving the Western Cape housing crisis, 
 
CAPE TOWN 00000148  002 OF 002 
 
 
but rather to beautify the margins of the N2 highway before the 2010 
World Cup, thereby eliminating the poor from the sides of the N2 and 
replacing them with more expensive housing.  This case will be a 
significant test case for the rights of poor communities who are 
evicted to make way for housing upgrades. 
La Lime