Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BERLIN538, GERMAN COURT DECISION ON MON810 CREATES AGRICULUTRAL AND

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERLIN538.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BERLIN538 2009-05-08 15:42 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Berlin
VZCZCXRO9902
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRL #0538/01 1281542
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081542Z MAY 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4042
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000538 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EB/TPP/BTT JACK BOBO, JFINN, GCLEMENTS 
USDA FOR FAS, EJONES, DYOUNG, SNENON, CRIKER, EPORTER 
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR MCLARKSON, JMURPHY 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD KPAO TBIO GM
 
SUBJECT: GERMAN COURT DECISION ON MON810 CREATES AGRICULUTRAL AND 
POLITICAL PROBLEMS 
 
REFS:  A) Munich 90  B) BERLIN 520 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.  PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. 
 
1.  (SBU)  SUMMARY.  On May 5, the administrative court in 
Braunschweig rejected Monsanto's request for an injunction against 
the cultivation ban for MON810.  Monsanto contacts report that it is 
considering an appeal of the decision.  The announcement was widely 
covered by radio, TV, and internet news outlets.  Reports indicate 
that corn seed for up to 20,000 hectares might have an adventitious 
presence of MON810 at a level of less than 0.1 percent.  It is 
unclear if this seed has been planted. The competent authorities 
have not yet decided how to handle this issue.  Despite the MON810 
ban, Federal Agricultural Minister Aigner approved two new biotech 
events for field trial and additional approvals are expected in 
coming days.  END SUMMARY. 
 
COURT SUPPORT BAN ON MON810 
 
2. (SBU)  On May 5, the administrative court in Braunschweig 
rejected Monsanto's request for an injunction against the 
cultivation ban for MON810.  The court said in its ruling that the 
level of scientific evidence for environmental damage shown by 
Minister Aigner (Christian Social Union, CSU) in her action was 
sufficient to prohibit the cultivation of MON810. In summarizing the 
positions of various German federal agencies on the issue, the court 
concluded that the public interest for risk prevention has to be 
given priority.  Specifically, the Federal Office for Nature 
Protection (BfN), closely associated with the Environment Ministry, 
supported the ban.  The Federal Office for Consumer Protection and 
Food Safety (BVL), the Federal Research Institute for Agriculture 
(JKI), the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), and the 
Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI), all more closely associated with the 
Agriculture Ministry, concluded that there were not sufficient 
scientific concerns for the cultivation ban. 
 
3.  (SBU)  In its opinion, the court elaborated at length about the 
purpose of the safeguard clause in the German Genetech Law and about 
examples where the precautionary principle had been applied.  It 
stated that the ban is only temporary until the European Commission 
and the European Council of Ministers have come to a final decision 
about the safety of MON810.  It appears that the court was only 
interested in the new or additional information which indicated a 
potential risk.  The court also said its role was not to evaluate 
the presented scientific reports.  However, the court pointed out 
that the cited study of Schmidt et al. (2008 and 2009) demanded 
further research to explain the observations on the mode of action 
in non-target species. 
 
NEXT LEGAL STEPS 
 
4.  (SBU) Monsanto put out a press release expressing its 
disappointment with the court decision and indicating that it was 
considering an appeal.  The appeal must be filed within two weeks, 
which would expire on May 19.  The goal of the appeal would be to 
get an injunction to lift the ban so that farmers still can plant 
MON810 corn this year.  Regardless of the outcome on the injunction, 
the administrative court in Braunschweig will next have to evaluate 
the facts presented in order to decide ultimately if the ban is 
justified.  For this part of the trial, Monsanto has indicated it 
would be very helpful if the new studies were peer reviewed.  In the 
current situation, the judges in Braunschweig are confronted with 
contradicting statements about the value of the new studies   It is 
unknown how long this court proceeding might take. 
 
REACTIONS 
 
6.  (SBU)  German electronic and paper media reported widely on the 
Braunschweig court decision.  Most of these reports were factual 
without any further comment.   Agricultural Minister Aigner 
reportedly welcomed the decision along with Greenpeace and other 
NGOs. Greenpeace said in a press release that ''environmental and 
consumer concerns are ranked higher than the interests of large 
industrial companies.  The decision is a success for the majority of 
the consumers who reject the cultivation of gene-plants.'' 
Bavarian Minister President Horst Seehofer (CSU) said that Aigner's 
decision was courageous and right. He said he interpreted the court 
decision as an obvious signal towards the agro-company Monsanto, 
which ''acts without regard for the interest of the public.''  ''The 
stop sign of the court is as obvious as the position of the people 
opposing commercial cultivation of genetically modified plants.'' 
 
NEXT PROBLEM:  ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE (AP) OF MON810 SEEDS IN 
CONVENTIONAL CORN VARIETIES COULD LEAD TO PLOWING UP OF FIELDS 
 
 
BERLIN 00000538  002 OF 002 
 
 
7.  (SBU) Various sources indicate that there are in Germany 
conventional corn seed lots equivalent to 15,000 to 20,000 hectares 
containing traces of MON810 seeds at a level of less than 0.1 
percent.  The AP was detected in routine seed tests performed by 
state authorities during the past two months.   The owners of these 
seed lots, reportedly seed breeders and traders, were informed about 
the findings and at the time told that this was not a problem 
because the ban was not yet announced.  At this time, it is not 
clear how much of the corn seed with AP MON810 was planted. 
 
8.  (SBU)  Sources indicate that this problem has been discussed 
between the various State-level authorities in Germany who 
reportedly do not want to take any action until the legal situation 
is absolutely clear.  Sources in Bavaria report that the Bavarian 
Minister for Environment, Markus Soeder (CSU), has approached 
Federal Agricultural Minister Aigner to ask her advice.  Sources say 
that Soeder is demanding that fields planted with the AP seeds be 
plowed up.  Most of the other States have not yet expressed a view 
to have the fields plowed.  However, one state-level biotech expert 
has indicated that the states currently intend to act uniformly in 
all parts of Germany once there is a clear path forward. 
 
9.  (SBU)  Unofficially, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food 
and Consumer Protection (BMELV) has indicated that its legal 
interpretation is that the ban does not permit AP of any amount of 
MON810 in conventional seeds.  Aigner has yet to indicate how she 
wants to move forward on this issue.  Agricultural contacts in the 
Chancellery are extremely concerned that a decision to plow up 
fields would move the biotech issue onto a completely new level. 
 
10.  (SBU)  Monsanto did not address this topic in its initial court 
filing in Braunschweig but may do so in an appeal. 
 
AIGNER APPROVES OTHER BIOTECH CROPS FOR FIELD TRIALS 
 
11.  (SBU)  After her decision to ban MON810, Minister Aigner 
repeatedly stressed that this was not a change in policy and that 
she would continue to decide biotech event approvals on a 
case-by-case basis.  On April 30, Aigner approved field tests for 20 
hectares of starch potato (Amflora) in the state of 
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.  This was less than the 40 hectares 
requested by BASF.  On May 4, Aigner approved field trial for 9.6 
sqm of fungus resistant biotech barley also in the state of 
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.  The applicant is the University of Giessen, 
which has a strong program in biotech research.  In previous years, 
several field trials of the barley were destroyed.  These were 
located near the University, north of Frankfurt.  In her upcoming 
trip to Washington (REF B), Aigner will likely point to these 
actions to show her support of the technology.  Sources informally 
indicate that within the next several days, Aigner is expected to 
announce the approval of two more field trials for potatoes, but 
reject another potato field trial application.  This event expresses 
an antibody against cholera.  Medical applications of biotechnology 
are much more widely accepted in Germany, but the field testing of 
this product will likely be too much for Minister Aigner to support 
in the current political environment. 
 
12.  This cable was coordinated with Consulate General Munich. 
 
KOENIG