Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BUCHAREST232, ROMANIA: SUCCESSFUL BIOTECH OUTREACH TO NEW GOVERNMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BUCHAREST232.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BUCHAREST232 2009-04-06 11:44 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Bucharest
VZCZCXRO0397
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHBM #0232/01 0961144
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 061144Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9395
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 0032
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BUCHAREST 000232 
 
STATE FOR EB/TPP/MTAA/ABT JBOBO AND MSZYMANSKI; EUR/CE FOR ASCHEIBE 
SOFIA FOR AG ATTACHE FOR HVANHUYNH 
USDA FOR FAS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD TBIO KPAO RO
SUBJECT: ROMANIA: SUCCESSFUL BIOTECH OUTREACH TO NEW GOVERNMENT 
OFFICIALS 
 
REF: A) BUCHAREST 29; B) STATE 20108; C) BUCHAREST 120 
 
Sensitive But Unclassified; not for Internet distribution. 
 
1.  (U) SUMMARY:  On March 16 and 17, DOS Senior Advisor for 
Biotechnology Jack Bobo visited Romania to meet with new Romanian 
government officials to advocate for the benefits of agricultural 
biotechnology.  Mr. Bobo's visit was supported by biotech outreach 
funds from EEB (refs A and B).  Post's Economic Section and Foreign 
Agricultural Service also organized a mid-level roundtable to 
discuss biotech safety and regulation issues in the EU.  Officials 
and participants indicated continuing support for agricultural 
biotechnology in Romania and discussed ways to strengthen their 
pro-biotech voice within the EU.  Industry representatives plan to 
initiate the first stacked field testing in Europe this season in 
western Romania.  END SUMMARY. 
 
MEETINGS WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS 
 
2.  (SBU) Following on post's previous biotech outreach efforts to 
farmers and academics, post sought to capitalize on an opportunity 
to discuss and educate new Romanian government officials about 
agricultural biotechnology.  Under the previous government, the 
Agriculture and Environment Ministries disagreed about the use of 
biotechnology crops in Romania.  However, the new officials at the 
ministries have a more cooperative relationship as evidenced by 
Romania's recent supportive vote in the EU for the cultivation of 
two new additional biotech corn varieties (reftel C).  Mr. Bobo met 
with representatives from the Ministries of Agriculture and 
Environment as well as the National Veterinary Authority. 
 
3.  (SBU) At the Ministry of Agriculture, Mr. Vasile Bacila, Chief 
Adviser to Minister Ilie Sarbu, reiterated the Minister's support of 
agricultural biotechnology extending back to his previous term as 
Agriculture Minister prior to 2004.  Bacila also highlighted 
Romanian efforts to use biotechnology for biofuel production. 
However, he opined that the cost may be too high for large-scale 
production.  He also stated that Minister Sarbu recently traveled to 
Brussels to lobby for biotech agricultural options in the 
Environment Committee, but was told he would need to wait for 
further approval from the European Food Safety Authority.  (Note: 
Sarbu's daughter, Daciana-Octavia Sarbu, is a member of the European 
Parliament, sits on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 
Committee, and is strongly anti-biotech). 
 
4.  (SBU) Mr. Bobo also met with the new President (State Secretary 
equivalent) at the Veterinary Authority, Marian Zlotea, and his 
office directors, Liviu Rusu and Nicolae Lazar.  Mr. Zlotea is a 
former EU parliamentarian and has experience working in the EU 
structures.  While he expressed support for biotechnology, he also 
mentioned the difficulty in meeting stringent EU requirements with 
regards to biotech traceability issues.  Concerning the promotion of 
biotechnology in Romania, he expressed frustration that government 
officials must advocate for agricultural biotechnology.  In his 
opinion, private industry should better organize biotech supporters 
to ensure their voices lead public debate, not the government.  He 
felt the showdown between the government and green groups only 
further erodes public support for biotechnology because citizens 
remain skeptical of government-supported programs.  Mr. Zlotea 
stated he prefers that the government be a mediator in the debate, 
not an advocate.  He also commented that the GOR is under pressure 
from other EU member states such as Austria, Hungary and France 
regarding Romania's pro-biotech stance and that Romania needs more 
support within the European Commission because it can not stand 
alone in the face of anti-biotech members. 
 
5.  (U) The Veterinary Authority expressed particular interest in 
the "EnviroPig," which Mr. Bobo said is under development in the 
U.S.  The genetically-modified animal is intended to reduce 
greenhouse gas emissions by 75 percent.  (Note: Romania is a large 
pork producing and consuming society.)  Zlotea and his office 
directors seemed open to the possibility of using such options in 
the future and would like more information and research on 
transgenic and cloned animals. 
 
6.  (SBU) Additionally, Mr. Bobo met at the Ministry of Environment 
with two of Minister Nicolae Nemirschi's personal counselors, 
Iozefina Lipan and Irina Tudorache, and Office Director Silviu 
Megan.  All expressed openness to the possibilities of agricultural 
biotechnology, especially for biofuels, but remained concerned about 
the impact of such products on the environment, especially with 
regard to co-existence problems.  As per reftel C, they reiterated 
their continued need for more science-based studies ensuring the 
safety of biotech applications. 
 
 
BUCHAREST 00000232  002 OF 003 
 
 
WORKING LEVEL ROUNDTABLE 
 
7.  (SBU) The working level roundtable was attended by twenty 
representatives from the Ministries of Agriculture, Environment, 
Foreign Affairs and the Veterinary Authority.  In his presentation, 
Mr. Bobo reiterated the role that agricultural biotechnology has in 
addressing global challenges in food security, energy and the 
environment.  He mentioned that Romania has a strong agricultural 
history and experience in growing biotech crops, especially prior to 
joining the EU, highlighting that the scientific approach is the key 
to success.  His information was well received; Romanian 
counterparts expressed enthusiasm for the continued use of biotech 
products and expressed frustration over the European approach 
banning soy and efforts hampering further expansion of biotech 
crops.  Mr. Bobo further encouraged Romanian policy makers to play 
an active role in the EU to preserve biotech options for farmers. 
 
8.  (U) In addition to Mr. Bobo's presentation, Parliamentarian and 
President of the Agricultural Commission Valeriu Tabara provided an 
overview of the political situation in the EU, urging adoption of a 
more scientific EU approach in order to use biotechnology to help 
with problems in food security, climate change, drought and 
flooding.  Additionally, he noted the economic impact of the post-EU 
accession ban on biotech soybean cultivation in Romania and 
estimated that it has cost farmers up to 500 million USD in lost 
revenue. 
 
9.  (U) Senior Advisor for Biotechnology at the Ministry of 
Agriculture, Ms. Tatiana Preda, also presented information that the 
government is undertaking changes to improve co-existence laws and 
expects a continued increase in the planting of biotech corn in the 
coming year, up to 12,000 hectares in 2009.  She also discussed the 
environmental benefits of biotech crops in biofuel production, but 
like Mr. Bacila she expressed concern about the cost effectiveness. 
 
 
PRESS INTERVIEWS 
 
10.  (U) Mr. Bobo also conducted interviews with the Jurnal 
National, Romania's largest circulation newspaper, and with the 
agricultural trade magazine AgroTerra.  These interviews should be 
published shortly, and post will provide translated copies to the 
Department.  Post also used EEB funds for biotech outreach to 
translate an article on biotech in Romania by Dr. Peter Gregory, who 
visited Romania twice in biotech promotion programs post organized 
in 2008.  The article was published in AgroTerra to coincide with 
Mr. Bobo's visit. 
 
NEW INDUSTRY-INITIATED STACKED FIELD TESTING 
 
11.  (SBU) Mr. Bobo also met with industry representatives from 
Monsanto and Syngenta (he had met with a Pioneer representative 
during his prior stop in Hungary).  The industry officials noted 
that anti-biotech EU member states, particularly France, are 
lobbying the GOR to change its position on biotechnology.  The 
representatives agreed that organizing a group of pro-biotech 
supporters would be beneficial and could help support Romania and 
other newer EU member states to exchange experiences with more 
developed countries such as Spain, thereby banding their voices 
together in dealings with the Commission. 
 
12.  (SBU) As part of their outreach efforts, businesses plan to 
bring more Spanish researchers to educate Romanian authorities about 
crop co-existence isolation distances, since each state can 
establish its own isolation distances for biotech crops.  Romania's 
standard is currently 200 meters, but Bulgaria recently proposed a 
thirty kilometer distance, which could impact Romanian farms near 
the border.  With regard to the introduction of new varieties, 
industry members mentioned that Romania continues to have problems 
with weed population diversity and corn root worm, which are not 
addressed by MON810, but could be addressed by varieties 
commercially available in the U.S.  They expect Roundup Ready corn 
will be available in Romania in 2010 or 2011, followed by soy. 
Representatives stated Romanian farmers and officials do not 
understand that approval for the reintroduction of soy is necessary 
at the EU level, which is more difficult because compared to corn, 
soy is not as large a share of the market in other parts of the EU 
as it is in Romania. 
 
13.  (SBU) Currently, the companies are working together to create a 
field testing station in the Timisoara (western Romania) district of 
biotech supporter and Parliament member Mr. Tabara.  It would be the 
first in Europe to conduct field trials of stacked varieties, which 
combine two or more biotech traits, such as insect resistance and 
herbicide tolerance, in a single plant.  They expect to start this 
 
BUCHAREST 00000232  003 OF 003 
 
 
summer with biotech events from several companies and will stack up 
to eight traits in a single plant.  The goal is to use the site as a 
model for Europe and to bring farmers and politicians from elsewhere 
in the EU to prove the benefits of the technology.  Supporters 
believe Romania has the potential to be a leader in Europe on 
agricultural biotechnology, and a model field testing station and 
coalition of biotech-supportive countries could help Romania 
leverage political power in the EU.  Post will continue to work with 
industry representatives to support cooperative efforts amongst EU 
member countries on biotechnology. 
 
15.  (SBU) Comment:  Post would like to thank the Department for its 
continued financial support to allow post to conduct biotech 
outreach programs in Romania.  Mr. Bobo's visit and expertise helped 
solidify our relations with Romania's new government officials. 
Biotech supporters in-country greatly appreciate post's and the 
Department's activities to support Romanian officials in their 
efforts to promote pro-biotech policies in Europe.  Post will 
continue to work with these officials to strengthen their voices 
with other pro-biotech countries.  Additionally, post will 
coordinate with industry representatives as they develop the first 
stacked field testing in Europe on Romanian soil, which will no 
doubt help deepen Romania's experience and allow it to serve as a 
role model in the EU for pro-biotech education of farmers and policy 
makers.  End Comment. 
 
GUTHRIE-CORN