Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09AITTAIPEI392, MEDIA REACTION: G-20, U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, NORTH

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09AITTAIPEI392.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09AITTAIPEI392 2009-04-03 08:16 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0392/01 0930816
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030816Z APR 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1286
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9084
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0523
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000392 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: G-20, U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, NORTH 
KOREA 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage April 3 on the agreements reached at the G20 summit in 
London to rescue the global economy; on the legislators' move to cut 
tax, and on the year-end Taipei County Magistrate election. 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, the G20 summit was a 
major subject of discussion in local newspapers.  An editorial in 
the pro-unification "United Daily News" commented on the G20 summit, 
saying the G20 summit matters as to whether the global economic and 
financial order can be rebuilt.  A news analysis in the "United 
Daily News" said that holding a G20 summit is better than not 
holding it, even though the summit offers no panacea for the 
financial crisis, and it questioned whether world leaders will allow 
the Anglo-Saxon style of economy, meaning that of the United States 
and the United Kingdom, to continue its leadership role during the 
global financial crisis.  An op-ed, also in the "United Daily News," 
agreed with a recent argument that the G20 summit is actually a G2 
summit, meaning a summit between Chinese President Hu Jintao and 
United States President Barack Obama.  The op-ed said that an era is 
coming of the United States and China coordinating and leading the 
world.  Concerning the U.S., China and Taiwan relations, an 
editorial in the conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
"China Post" praised United States President Barack Obama's conduct 
of his meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao.  The editorial said 
that, judging from United States President Obama's performance in 
the last few months, it is unlikely that the Obama Administration 
will have any major policy changes regarding cross-Strait issues, 
which is a good thing for Taiwan.  An op-ed in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taipei Times" came up with three suggestions to 
United States President Barack Obama and Congress, so that the 
United States can assure its national security and interests across 
the Taiwan Strait.  One of the three suggestions included deploying 
at least two aircraft carrier task forces in the Western Pacific. 
On the North Korean issue, a column in the centrist, KMT-leaning 
"China Times" asserted that the United States and China must have 
already known that what North Korea intends to launch is actually a 
satellite, not a ballistic missile.  The column says Japan's 
insistence that what North Korea is going to launch is a missile is 
an excuse for Japan to revive its militarism.  End summary. 
 
3. G-20 
 
A) "G20 Summit Walks on the Watershed of Crisis" 
 
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] 
editorialized (4/3): 
 
"... Regarding this G20 summit, if all countries still make their 
own one-sided decisions as before the summit and only care about 
their own interests at the moment, there is the a danger that the 
summit could start an even greater depression than what the London 
Economic Conference of 1933 caused.  Nowadays, one third of global 
experts believe that a great depression is imminent, which is a 
manifestation of pessimism.  However, if all countries make the 
summit successful by sharing in hardship during a time of crisis, 
compromising with each other and, at least, establish a framework 
and make promises regarding problems for the medium term and beyond, 
the summit will relieve [all countries] from predicaments.  Even 
though [the summit] might not revive the 'irrational prosperity' 
that the world has experienced over the last few years, at least it 
achieves stabilization as well as mutual trust, and cooperation is 
within expectation. 
 
"Therefore, the G20 summit is an especially important meeting which 
matters to the global welfare.  It [G20 summit] is equivalent to a 
watershed of the reestablishment of global finance and economy.  The 
summit will decide whether it will be a disaster or a blessing [to 
the global finance and economy]. ..." 
 
B) "The U.S. Caused Trouble, Bad Luck to the World; Still Let the 
U.S. Be the Banker?" 
 
European correspondent Chen Yu-hui wrote a news analysis in the 
"United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (4/3): 
 
"The economic entities which attended the G20 summit in London 
account for ninety percent of global GDP and wished to find 
countermeasures to deal with the global economic crisis.  Needless 
to say, there is certainly no panacea.  However, it is always much 
better to hold a summit than not. 
 
"The first question is that, a crisis occurred in the global 
economy, which used to operate based on the Anglo-Saxon style of 
economy.  Is the style of thinking in Wall Street and London still 
able to resolve the problems?  At least, politicians in Berlin, 
Moscow and Paris do not believe this anymore. ... 
 
"Facing the domestic economy, every country has its own way.  Facing 
 
the global economy, many leaders are starting to question, can the 
Anglo-Saxon style of economy still be the banker without being 
challenged?  Or has the global economy been shuffled during the 
summit?" 
 
C) "An Era of Coordination between United States and China Has 
Arrived" 
 
Chen Hsin-chih, an Associate Professor of the Department of 
Political Science at National Cheng Kung University, opined in the 
pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] (4/3): 
 
"The financial tsunami changed countries' understandings of the 
allotment of global power.  China and the United States, after 
weighing their own powers' rise and fall and close, mutually reliant 
economic, trade and financial relations, are jointly speeding up the 
formation of a consensus trying hard to build a Twentieth-First 
Century with active cooperation.  A prologue for China and the 
United States to coordinate and cooperate to run the world has been 
unveiled. 
 
"In the future, the international political, economic and security 
system will be coordinated by China and the United States before its 
tone is set.  The room for second-tier powers to maneuver will 
decrease gradually.  The direction of change across the Taiwan 
Strait will be much more restricted in the future. ... 
 
"The global structure is shifting from the United States being the 
unilateral hegemon towards China and the United States being the 
hegemonies with a mechanism of coordination to run the world 
jointly.  The United States is not necessarily declining, and China 
is likely to rise peacefully.  By comparison, the Sino-U.S. 
coordination mechaQsm will produce disadvantages for countries such 
as [those of] the European Union and Japan, whose political and 
economic power is declining.  Ordinary small countries even face the 
crisis of being marginalized rapidly.  The coordination between 
China and the United States will further reinforce the stability 
across the Taiwan Strait.  However, it also adds pressure on Taiwan 
to maintain Taiwan's leading role on issues." 
 
4. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
A) "First G-20 Summit Went Well for Taiwan" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" 
[circulation: 30,000] editorialized (4/3): 
 
"After much speculation, the long-anticipated first face-to-face 
meeting between mainland Chinese President Hu Jintao and U.S. 
President Barack Obama appears to have gone without a hitch. ... 
 
"Indeed, reports from Washington have suggested that Obama even 
brought up the issue of human rights in Taiwan and Tibet during the 
meeting, although no details have been confirmed. 
 
"Before Obama was elected, his opponents accused him of lacking 
experience in dealing with complicated international issues.  But 
since taking office, Obama has not made any blunders on China 
policy, and indeed appears to have followed the advice of seasoned 
experts. 
 
"Obama did not take the bait of issuing a harsh reaction when a U.S. 
naval ship was harassed by mainland Chinese vessels in March. 
Instead, he agreed with Hu that military-to-military exchanges 
should be expanded, which is a most prudent way to avoid similar 
clashes in the future. ... 
 
"As a flicker of warming U.S.-China relations, Obama has accepted 
Hu's invitation to visit mainland China later this year.  Based on 
their first exchange, however, the ROC should be able to rest easy 
knowing the Obama administration will not likely introduce major 
policy changes that could undermine cross-strait relations." 
 
B) "A Storm is Gathering in the Strait" 
 
Li Thian-hok, a freelance commentator based in Pennsylvania, opined 
in the pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" 
[circulation: 30,000] (4/3): 
 
"Given the increasingly dangerous and fluid situation in the Taiwan 
Strait, on the 30th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) it 
is important to remind US President Barack Obama and Congress to 
reaffirm the spirit and letter of the TRA both in word and deed. 
... 
 
The greatest threat to the US' homeland security is not a terrorist 
attack with a dirty bomb; it is an unexpected, nuclear Pearl Harbor. 
 The basic US national security strategy is misdirected.  In order 
 
to keep the peace in East Asia and ultimately to protect homeland 
security, the US must continue to support democracy and uphold the 
Taiwanese people's legitimate aspirations for freedom. 
 
"To keep the peace in the Taiwan Strait and to encourage China to 
pursue peaceful development, we urge the US president and Congress 
to take the following steps: 
 
"First, reaffirm the US policy that the future of Taiwan must be 
determined by peaceful means and that the US opposes any unilateral 
action to change the status quo; 
 
"Second, deploy at least two aircraft carrier task forces in the 
Western Pacific and secure basing rights in the Philippines and the 
Ryukyu Islands as part of US efforts to maintain the capacity to 
resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion; 
 
"Third, develop a contingency plan to empower an international 
commission to conduct and supervise a plebiscite on Taiwan under the 
right circumstances to allow the Taiwanese people to exercise their 
basic human right to decide their future without outside pressure or 
internal subversion. ..." 
 
5. North Korea 
 
"What North Korea Will Launch Should Be a Satellite" 
 
The "International Lookout" column in the centrist, KMT-leaning 
"China Times" [circulation: 150,000] wrote (4/3): 
 
"Is the object that North Korea is going to launch a satellite or a 
ballistic missile?  This column believes that it is likely a 
satellite.  The United States should also have knowledge of it. 
Only Japan has a hidden purpose, and it is deliberately pretending 
that it is confused [about what North Korea is going to launch]. 
... 
 
"[Since] the situation is so clear, so why does Japan still insist 
that what North Korea is going to launch is a ballistic missile? 
The point is that Japan is cunning.  Just [let us] use an article in 
the United States' 'Pacific Forum' as evidence: 'The incident of 
North Korean agents' abduction of Japanese citizens in those years 
has become a symbol which fuels Japanese nationalism.  Japanese 
media, for their own business interests, recklessly hype up the 
issue and demonize North Korea.  Guided by Japanese public opinion, 
being anti-North Korea becomes politically correct.'  Of course, 
this [instance] is media hype once again.  The Japanese government 
then follows suit and becomes tough.  There is no other purpose 
other than to create a threat, so that Japan can expedite its goal 
to become a country with a strong military and eventually resume 
militarism.  The purpose of Japan's constant hype of China's 
military power also lies in this." 
 
YOUNG