Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO3300, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 12/03/08

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO3300.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO3300 2008-12-03 08:07 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7096
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3300/01 3380807
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030807Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9170
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 3591
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 1230
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5021
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 9235
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 1801
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6637
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2633
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2763
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 003300 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 12/03/08 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Sankei-FNN poll on Aso cabinet, political parties (Sankei) 
 
(2) Support ratings for Aso cabinet enter danger zone; Prime 
Minister Aso should passionately talk about Japan (Sankei) 
 
(3) Aso cabinet losing momentum two months after inauguration; LDP 
members worried that LDP will lose election under Aso (Asahi) 
 
(4) Close cooperation between MSDF, JCG vital in combating Somalia 
piracy (Yomiuri) 
 
(5) Editorial: Meaning of appointing Clinton to post of secretary of 
state (Nikkei) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Sankei-FNN poll on Aso cabinet, political parties 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
December 2, 2008 
 
Questions & Answers 
 
(Note) Figures shown in percentage. Figures in parentheses denote 
findings from a previous Sankei-FNN survey conducted Sept. 25. 
 
Q: Do you support the Aso cabinet? 
 
Yes 27.5 (44.6) 
No 58.3 (35.7) 
Don't know (D/K) + can't say which (CSW) 14.2 (19.7) 
 
Q: Which political party do you support? 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 26.7 (31.7) 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 23.6 (25.9) 
New Komeito (NK) 4.1 (4.1) 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2.6 (2.5) 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1.9 (1.3) 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.4 (0.1) 
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) --- --- 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0.1 (0.1) 
Other political parties 0.4 (1.0) 
None 38.4 (32.3) 
D/K + can't say (C/S) 1.8 (1.0) 
 
Q: Do you appreciate Prime Minister Aso and his cabinet on the 
following points? 
 
Prime Minister Aso's personal character 
Yes 33.1 
No 56.7 
D/K+CSW 10.2 
 
Prime Minister Aso's leadership 
Yes 15.8 
No 71.9 
D/K+CSW 12.3 
 
Foreign policy 
 
TOKYO 00003300  002 OF 010 
 
 
Yes 28.3 
No 47.6 
D/K+CSW 24.1 
 
Economic policy 
Yes 16.2 
No 71.3 
D/K+CSW 12.5 
 
Actual results over past 2 months since coming into office 
Yes 12.7 
No 70.6 
D/K+CSW 16.7 
 
Reform policy 
Yes 40.7 
No 47.5 
D/K+CSW 11.8 
 
What Prime Minister Aso has said and done 
Yes 12.6 
No 78.4 
D/K+CSW 9.0 
 
Q: Do you think a government-introduced bill to extend the Maritime 
Self-Defense Force's refueling activities in the Indian Ocean for 
multinational forces should be passed during the current extended 
extraordinary session of the Diet? 
 
Yes 43.0 
No 41.3 
D/K+CSW 15.7 
 
 
Q: Do you think a government-introduced bill to establish the 
Consumer Affairs Agency should be passed during the current extended 
extraordinary session of the Diet? 
 
Yes 52.2 
No 25.5 
D/K+CSW 22.3 
 
Q: Do you think the government should present a second supplementary 
budget for economic stimulus measures to the Diet within the year? 
 
Yes 78.1 
No 15.4 
D/K+CSW 6.5 
 
Q: Do you think Prime Minister Aso and DPJ President Ozawa should 
have more one-on-one debates? 
 
Yes 67.1 
No 27.1 
D/K+CSW 5.8 
 
Q: Do you think Prime Minister Aso should shuffle his cabinet as 
early as possible after the Diet has wound up its current session? 
 
Yes 64.3 
No 27.1 
D/K+CSW 8.6 
 
TOKYO 00003300  003 OF 010 
 
 
 
Q: The government has now decided to hand out cash benefits as an 
economic stimulus measure. Do you think this cash handout should 
reach all of the people with no restrictions? 
 
Yes 47.8 
No 48.5 
D/K+CSW 3.7 
 
 
Q: Do you think Prime Minister Aso's decision on this cash handout 
was appropriate? 
 
Yes 18.2 
No 72.5 
D/K+CSW 9.3 
 
Q: Do you think it is too late if this cash handout is in the spring 
of next year or afterward? 
 
Yes 56.5 
No 31.7 
D/K+CSW 11.8 
 
Q: Do you think you will receive the cash handout if you are 
eligible? 
 
Yes 88.3 
No 7.6 
D/K+CSW 4.1 
 
Q: Who do you think is most appropriate now for Japan's prime 
minister among the following politicians? 
 
Taro Aso 8.8 (22.6) 
Shigeru Ishiba 3.3 (1.6) 
Nobuteru Ishiba 5.4 (3.9) 
Yuriko Koike 4.7 (4.7) 
Kaoru Yosano 2.9 (2.2) 
Junichiro Koizumi 11.5 (13.2) 
Other ruling party lawmakers 4.1 (1.5) 
Ichiro Ozawa 11.4 (16.1) 
Naoto Kan 3.7 (3.0) 
Yukio Hatoyama 3.4 (1.7) 
Katsuya Okada 3.3 (2.1) 
Seiji Maehara 2.3 (1.6) 
Other opposition party lawmakers 2.4 (2.5) 
None 29.2 (18.4) 
D/K+C/S 3.6 (4.9) 
 
 
Q: When comparing Prime Minister Aso and DPJ President Ozawa, which 
one do you think is more convincing? 
Prime Minister Aso 27.9 
DPJ President Ozawa 51.5 
D/K+CSW 20.6 
 
Q: Which one do you think is stronger in one-on-one debates? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 26.7 
DPJ President Ozawa 53.7 
D/K+CSW 19.6 
 
TOKYO 00003300  004 OF 010 
 
 
 
Q: Which one do you think is better when it comes to policies? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 28.3 
DPJ President Ozawa 36.4 
D/K+CSW 35.3 
 
Q: Which one do you think is trustworthier? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 31.4 
DPJ President Ozawa 29.7 
D/K+CSW 38.9 
 
Q: Which one do you think is more appealing in election 
campaigning? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 42.1 
DPJ President Ozawa 30.0 
D/K+CSW 27.9 
 
Q: Which one do you think is more appropriate for prime minister? 
 
Prime Minister Aso 31.5 
DPJ President Ozawa 32.5 
D/K+CSW 36.0 
 
 
Q: The House of Representatives' current membership is up until the 
fall of next year. When do you think the next election should be 
held for the House of Representatives? 
 
Within the year 14.8 
Early in the new year 28.4 
During the first half of next year 27.2 
Upon expiry, or sometime before that and during the latter half of 
next year 25.7 
D/K+C/S 3.9 
 
Q: Do you think an election should have been held for the House of 
Representatives by November? 
 
Yes 49.9 
No 41.3 
D/K+CSW 8.8 
 
Q: Do you think an election should be held for the House of 
Representatives after the government has carried out economic 
stimulus measures? 
 
Yes 73.8 
No 19.9 
D/K+CSW 6.4 
 
Q: Do you think the U.S. presidential election's results will affect 
the next election for the House of Representatives? 
 
Yes 59.4 
No 35.4 
D/K+CSW 5.2 
 
Q: What form of government would you like to see after the next 
election for the House of Representatives? 
 
TOKYO 00003300  005 OF 010 
 
 
 
LDP-led coalition government 21.4 (24.1) 
DPJ-led coalition government 29.4 (32.1) 
Grand coalition involving both the LDP and the DPJ 42.4 (38.5) 
D/K+C/S 6.8 (5.3) 
 
Q: Prime Minister Aso's first term of office as LDP president is up 
until the fall of next year. How long do you think his government 
will continue? 
 
Replaced before the next election for the House of Representatives 
19.5 
Replaced after the next election for the House of Representatives 
52.8 
Replaced upon his term's expiry in the fall of next year 17.8 
Continue even after the fall of next year 6.1 
D/K+C/S 3.8 
 
Q: Do you think you are a floating voter with no particular party 
affiliation? 
 
Yes 60.5 
No 35.7 
D/K+CSW 3.8 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Nov. 29-30 by the 
Sankei Shimbun and Fuji News Network (FNN) over the telephone on a 
computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis. For the survey, a 
total of 1,000 persons were sampled from among men and women, aged 
20 and over, across the nation. 
 
(2) Support ratings for Aso cabinet enter danger zone; Prime 
Minister Aso should passionately talk about Japan 
 
SANKEI (Page 3) (Full) 
December 2, 2008 
 
The rate of public support for Prime Minister Taro Aso's cabinet was 
27.5 PERCENT  in a poll the Sankei Shimbun and FNN (Fuji News 
Network) jointly conducted. The Aso cabinet's support rating has now 
entered a danger zone, only two months after the Aso administration 
was inaugurated. The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), the largest 
opposition party led by Ichiro Ozawa, is certain to strengthen the 
offensive in criticizing Aso. Discord has surfaced in the ruling 
parties. 
 
When his bar-hopping every night was criticized by reporters, Aso 
snapped back at them. He has misread kanji characters. His 
counterblast and misreading are charming mistakes. However, he said 
many doctors lack common sense. Such a slip of the tongue is 
extremely inappropriate. There is no room for him to excuse. 
 
What is more serious is Aso's making of flip-flops on whether to set 
an income cap on eligibility for a flat-sum cash payout plan, which 
is a showcase policy of the Aso administration. The prime minister 
also corrected later his statement that the government would 
transfer 1 trillion yen from tax revenues for road projects to local 
governments in the form of local tax grants. He once said the 
government's interpretation of the Constitution should be changed. 
But he later backpedaled. 
 
It can't be helped that former Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 
 
TOKYO 00003300  006 OF 010 
 
 
Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa ridiculed the prime minister, 
saying, "The prime minister cannot take his remarks back." 
Statements by the prime minister, the head of the administration, 
carry incomparably more importance than those of other politicians. 
If the prime minister wavers in what he says, such will affect many 
people. As a result, the prime minister will lose the confidence of 
the people. 
 
Aso should remember why he, the head of a 20-member faction in the 
LDP, was elected LDP president and prime minister. 
 
Such elements as being a grandson of former Prime Minister Shigeru 
Yoshida, his dandyish manners, sharp tongue, and jokes might be a 
factor, but they do not matter much. Since many LDP lawmakers 
acknowledged politician Taro Aso's "strong voice," Aso was 
recommended as a candidate for prime minister. 
 
Aso showed his strong voice during the 2007 LDP presidential 
election. He was highlighted instead of another presidential 
candidate Yasuo Fukuda by delivering a grisly speech, even though 
his defeat was certain because eight factions, excluding the Aso 
faction, in the LDP had announced their support for Fukuda. 
Attracted by Aso, many junior and mid-level party members backed him 
in the election in defiance of decisions of their factions. This led 
him to the prime minister's post. Fukuda made a heartbreaking 
decision to hand the reins of government to Aso because he had to 
entrust Aso with his hope to revitalize the LDP. 
 
Aso thinks of himself as an optimist, and others also regard him 
that way. Amid the Japanese public's growing concern about their 
country's economic situation rather than the global financial 
crisis, Aso was adamant: "Japan is a great country. Japan's 
potential is enormous." Therefore, the public might have had hopes 
that he would remove the sense of impasse. 
 
For this reason, Aso should passionately talk about his view of 
Japan. Rather than talking about how he will to recover the economy, 
he should talk about how he will build a state and how Japan will 
take the initiative in the international community. He visited 
Yasukuni Shrine with his grandfather on April 28, 1952, when the San 
Francisco Peace Treaty became effective, to report the independence 
of Japan. He should now recall a sense of mission he felt that day. 
 
(3) Aso cabinet losing momentum two months after inauguration; LDP 
members worried that LDP will lose election under Aso 
 
ASAHI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
December 2, 2008 
 
Public support for Prime Minister Aso has sharply plunged in recent 
public opinion polls due to a string of gaffes and his policy 
measures going off track. Seeing such survey results, an increasing 
number of ruling party members now say that they will lose the next 
general election under Aso, although he became prime minister 
because they hoped he could lead the party to an election win. The 
Aso administration has lost momentum only two months after its 
inauguration. 
 
Aso secretly called Liberal Democratic Party Secretary General 
Hiroyuki Hosokawa and Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Tadamori 
Oshima into a room in the Imperial Hotel in Tokyo on the night of 
Nov. 19. In the meeting, Aso indicated his lingering attachment to a 
 
TOKYO 00003300  007 OF 010 
 
 
plan to dissolve the Lower House later this year or early next year. 
 
 
Aware of growing concerns in the LDP that the party would lose power 
under Aso, Hosoda and Oshima flatly opposed Aso's suggestion. They 
feared that if they raise the issue of dissolution, the possibility 
of the LDP becoming an opposition party might take on a realistic 
touch and the party might eventually begin to fall apart. They were 
not able to accept the desire of Aso, who wants to keep his grip on 
the party by hinting at Diet dissolution. 
 
"I would like to make utmost efforts to have the budget law take 
effect on April 1," Aso said on Nov. 29 in Iwate Prefecture, where 
Democratic Party of Japan President Ozawa comes from. He thus had to 
rule out the dissolution of the Lower House until the budget bill 
for next fiscal year clear the Diet. 
 
Even so, public support for the Aso administration has continued to 
plunge. In a public opinion survey by Nikkei and another agent on 
Dec. 1, public support sharply dropped to 31 PERCENT , underscoring 
that the LDP will not be able to win the election under Aso. 
 
In the LDP, where concerns are intensifying, moves aimed at breaking 
up the party and reorganizing are expected to become active. Even 
former Prime Minister Mori, who tried to dissuade junior LDP members 
from criticizing Aso during a speech on Nov. 30, expressed his 
apparent apprehension about the current situation, saying: "The LDP 
might be pressed to destroy itself and to be drawn into a 
realignment of the political world." 
 
LDP desperately trying to head off Diet dissolution 
 
Ahead of party head talks between Aso and Ozawa on Nov. 28, Oshima 
told Aso: "You should not eagerly make personal attacks against 
Ozawa." 
 
Oshima judged it was necessary to prevent a confrontational mood 
from being built up in order for the LDP to be able to continue to 
put off dissolution of the Lower House. Following Oshima's advice, 
Aso kept a low profile in the party head talks. 
 
The LDP leadership's judgment was that the party should remain on 
the defensive until the budget bill for next fiscal year is enacted 
next spring and should accumulate achievements while waiting for an 
opportunity. Appearing on a TV program on Nov. 30, Hosoda 
categorically said: "The Lower House will not be dissolved later 
this year or early next year." 
 
Why is the party leadership so eager to head off Diet dissolution? 
Perforations that could develop into cracks and cause the party fall 
apart have already appeared within the LDP. Members remain in the 
LDP despite different views, because it is a ruling party. 
 
If the prime minister decides to dissolve the Lower House, the 
possibility of the LDP losing political power as a result of the 
general election may become a reality. In an effort to survive in 
the political party, some forces in the party might strengthen their 
own policy lines and could even grope for ways to join hands with 
the DPJ. If some members leave the party, the ruling coalition will 
lose its two-thirds majority in the Lower House and no longer be 
able to pass legislation through override votes. In such a case, the 
Aso administration inevitably would immediately be at a standstill 
 
TOKYO 00003300  008 OF 010 
 
 
in the divided Diet. 
 
But the strategy of forcing the prime minister to give up on an 
early Diet dissolution and remain on the defensive has also produced 
negative effects. 
 
Aides to Aso were shocked at the opinion survey results released by 
Nikkei yesterday. Public support for the Aso cabinet plunged 17 
points to 31 PERCENT , while non-support soared 19 points to 62 
PERCENT . What shocked them more was that 17 PERCENT  each picked 
Aso and Ozawa in reply to a question asking who should be prime 
minister. In the previous survey, 36 PERCENT  picked Aso, while 16 
PERCENT  chose Ozawa. 
 
In a meeting of the government and LDP Consultative Council 
yesterday, one aide to the prime minister complained: "Everybody 
told the premier not to say anything. It was not good." Close aides 
to Aso believed that his unrestrained remarks were behind his 
popularity. So they have reacted to the party executive's policy, 
with one claiming: "He was overly modest. It is undesirable for 
those close to him to have restricted his deeds and remarks." 
 
The development of the situation beyond the expectations of the 
party executive and the Prime Minister's Office has caused cracks 
within the government. 
 
(4) Close cooperation between MSDF, JCG vital in combating Somalia 
piracy 
 
YOMIURI (Page 15) (Abridged slightly) 
December 3, 2008 
 
By Isami Takeda, professor, Dokkyo University 
 
There has been a rash of incidents of piracy in waters off Somalia 
and the Gulf of Aden northeast of Africa. Some 1,000 vessels were 
attacked as of the end of November this year. A total of 17 vessels 
are being held by pirates, and some 250 people are still held 
hostage. 
 
Connecting Japan and Europe, this oceanic area is a major trade 
route where some 20,000 commercial ships pass through annually. 
Japanese firms manage the operation of over 2,000 commercial 
vessels. Piracy has a grave impact on marine transport. 
 
Pirates are armed with AK-47s, shoulder-mounted rockets, and other 
weapons. Usually aboard a small boat from a mother ship disguised as 
a fishing boat or a cargo ship, pirates attack a vessel, take the 
crew hostage, and demand an exorbitant ransom. In April this year, 
the large oil tanker Takayama of Nippon Yusen was attacked by 
pirates with machine guns. Another tanker linked to a Japanese 
company was attacked in September. In November, the Japanese captain 
of a Chinese fishing boat was taken hostage. 
 
At the root of Somalia piracy is the state of anarchy in that 
nation. Police and military forces do not function in Somalia, which 
has been in a state of anarchy due to the civil war. Criminal groups 
in the country are left uncontrolled. Given the country's inability 
to clamp down on piracy, the international community must deal with 
the situation. 
 
Adopting two resolutions this year to curb piracy in waters off 
 
TOKYO 00003300  009 OF 010 
 
 
Somalia, the UN Security Council urged various countries to take 
necessary measures, including one using force. Based on the 
resolutions, such countries as the United States, European nations, 
India, and Malaysia have sent naval vessels and military aircraft to 
the area in question. 
 
In Japan, Prime Minister Taro Aso unveiled before the House of 
Representatives Antiterrorism Special Committee in October a plan to 
improve the law to utilize Maritime Self-Defense Force vessels to 
fight piracy. The step followed a set of proposals by Akihisa 
Nagashima and other members of the Democratic Party of Japan. A 
joint effort by the ruling and opposition camps to address the issue 
of piracy must be welcomed. 
 
The European Union (EU) is scheduled to launch full-fledged 
anti-piracy operations in December. Japan, too, must take action 
speedily. 
 
In doing so, the MSDF must work closely with the Japan Coast Guard 
(JCG). 
 
Piracy is an international crime. Police forces are responsible for 
cracking down on piracy. Cracking down on piracy at sea falls under 
the jurisdiction of the JCG. Tracking, investigating, and arresting 
pirates and seizing evidence require the execution of a series of 
laws. In order to help out Japanese crewmembers aboard a foreign 
vessel in a remote place like Somalia, the JCG is allowed to 
exercise its investigative authority and police powers as long as 
the vessel is on the high seas. In the wake of the hijacking of the 
Japanese-owned tanker Alondra Rainbow in 1999, the MSDF dispatched 
its patrol boats to waters in Southeast Asia. 
 
The MSDF has vessels, including the large patrol boat Shikishima, 
capable of long-distance cruises. If Japan can dispatch to waters 
off Somalia some MSDF vessels along with JCG patrol boats, that 
would help the country display its strong presence and deterrence in 
the area. 
 
It is quite difficult to exercise police powers against pirates on 
the high seas. The cases of UK, France, and Denmark testify that. 
 
The MSDF has conducted many joint anti-piracy exercises with 
relevant countries in the Straits of Malacca. Furthermore, there 
have been incidents in which JCG patrol boats fired at North Korean 
spy ships that intruded into Japanese waters. In combating piracy in 
waters off Somalia, it is essential for the MSDF to collaborate 
closely with the JCG, which has considerable experience in the field 
of international crime. 
 
(5) Editorial: Meaning of appointing Clinton to post of secretary of 
state 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
December 3, 2008 
 
President-elect Obama announced his cabinet appointees for foreign 
relations and security affairs in the new administration. 
 
Obama appointed Senator Hillary Clinton to serve as secretary of 
state. Defense Secretary Gates of the present Bush administration 
will remain in office. Former North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
(NATO) Supreme Commander Jones will take office as national security 
 
TOKYO 00003300  010 OF 010 
 
 
advisor. 
 
How the appointment of Clinton, with whom he staged a fierce battle 
over the Democratic Party nomination, as secretary of state, will 
affect the management of the administration is drawing attention. In 
the U.S., a new administration usually announces cabinet appointees 
for foreign relations and security affairs first. However, Mr. 
Obama, whose administration is to be launched amid an economic 
crisis, gave priority to appointing economic ministers, such as the 
appointment of Geithner to serve as Treasury secretary, breaking the 
custom. This is the first such case since the Bill Clinton 
administration. 
 
The lineup of foreign relations and security-related ministers 
indicates that Mr. Obama is not slighting that field. Explaining the 
appointment of Clinton, Obama said, "I will show to my friends and 
foes in the world my serious determination to reshape U.S. foreign 
relations and repair alliances." If the appointment of Clinton as 
secretary of state is proof of change, the selection of defense 
secretary indicates continuation and stability. 
 
He appears to have taken into account domestic affairs in appointing 
his cabinet ministers. The appointment of Clinton is intended to 
maintain the Democratic Party's all-party setup. Returning the 
Republican Gates as defense secretary is presumably aimed to unite 
the nation, thereby stabilizing the situations in Iraq and 
Afghanistan at an early date. 
 
Given U.S. political history, moves similar to power struggles have 
often occurred in the U.S. with the White House, National Security 
Council, State Department, and Defense Department aiming to realize 
policies they think appropriate. It is believed that when the 
relationship of trust between the president and the secretary of 
state is strong, this does not occur very often. 
 
It has been believed that former Secretary of State Kissinger during 
the Nixon administration and Secretary of State Baker during the 
administration of President George H. W. Bush exemplify such a case. 
These two cases cannot be likened to the relationship between 
President-elect Obama and Secretary-designate Clinton, who fiercely 
confronted Obama during the primary. 
 
There is a video image of Clinton during the primary shouting at 
Obama, "Shame on you, Barack Obama!" 
 
Vice President-elect Biden has also been picked for his expertise in 
foreign affairs, which makes the issue more complicated. The future 
course of relations between Obama and Clinton will be up to what 
course the new Obama administration will take. 
 
SCHIEFFER