Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08LONDON3181, IMO: LONDON CONVENTION REPORT ON MARINE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON3181.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08LONDON3181 | 2008-12-19 16:22 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy London |
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHLO #3181/01 3541622
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191622Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0732
INFO RHMFIUU/HQ EPA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDC/NOAA WASHDC
RUCPOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEAWJL/DOJ WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DOE WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF INTERIOR WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0564
UNCLAS LONDON 003181
SIPDIS
STATE PLEASE PASS TO IO/IOC FOR M. MORRISSEY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EWWT PHSA SENV KGHG KRAD UK
SUBJECT: IMO: LONDON CONVENTION REPORT ON MARINE
ENVIRONMENT ISSUES
¶1. SUMMARY: The International Maritime
Organization's (IMO) annual meetings for both the
1972 London Convention on the Prevention of Marine
Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter
(the "London Convention") and the 1996 Protocol to
the London Convention (the "London Protocol") made
progress on several marine environment issues.
They achieved a strong (but non-binding) resolution
on the controversial issue of ocean fertilization
for climate change that will allow scientific
research while restricting commercial ventures. The
meetings made progress on new guidelines for
placement of artificial reefs, a reporting format
for sub-seabed carbon sequestration projects, and
establishing a technical cooperation trust fund.
The meetings also adopted guidance on managing
spoilt cargo and removal of anti-fouling coatings,
and agreed to forward these to the IMO's Marine
Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) for
consideration and adoption. Other parties were
pleased to hear that the London Protocol is
currently before the U.S. Senate, awaiting the
Senate's advice and consent to ratification. END
SUMMARY
---------------------------
Introduction and Background
---------------------------
¶2. The annual meetings for both the 1972 London
Convention and the 1996 London Protocol were held
concurrently October 27-31 at the headquarters of
the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in
London. The U.S. delegation consisted of
representatives of Department of State, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corps of
Engineers, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Organization, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard
and the Department of Energy.
¶3. The Convention on the Prevention of Marine
Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter,
1972 (the London Convention) established a global
regime for the protection of the marine environment
from pollution caused by ocean dumping and
incineration at sea. It now has eighty-five
Parties. The United States became a Party in 1975.
The 1996 Protocol to the London Convention (the
London Protocol) is a free-standing treaty that
updates and improves the Convention, and will
eventually supersede it. Unlike the London
Convention, which lists substances that may not be
dumped in the ocean, the Protocol prohibits ocean
dumping of any waste or other matter except for
those specifically allowed to be considered for
dumping (a "reverse list"). The Protocol was
adopted in 1996, and the United States signed it in
¶1998. The Protocol entered into force March 24,
¶2006. The Protocol currently has 36 Parties, with
many more (including the United States) actively
working towards accession.
-----------------------
Scientific Group Report
-----------------------
¶4. The London Convention has a Scientific Group
that meets each spring and works intersessionally
on the technical issues of ocean dumping. The
London Protocol Scientific Group meets concurrently
with the London Convention's Scientific Group,
through an agreed arrangement that the offices of
Chair and Vice-Chair would consist of members
representing Parties to both the Protocol and to
the Convention.
¶5. The Chair of the London Convention and London
Protocol Scientific Groups provided an overview of
the 31st session of the Scientific Groups (held in
May 2008 in Guayaquil, Ecuador). The meeting
endorsed the recommendations of the 31st Scientific
Group session, including the adoption of the
revised "Generic Waste Assessment Guidelines," the
revised titles for the Specific and Generic
Guidelines to be displayed on the London Convention
website, the "Specific Guidelines for Assessment of
Inert, Inorganic Geological material," and the
"Guidance for the Placement of Artificial Reefs."
Additionally, the meetings adopted the "Draft
Guidance on Best Management Practices for Removal
of Anti-Fouling Coatings from Ships, including TBT
Hull Paints," and the "Draft Guidance on Managing
Spoilt Cargoes," with the agreement to forward both
to the 59th session of the International Maritime
Organization's Marine Environment Protection
Committee (MEPC) for consideration and adoption.
The Contracting Parties endorsed the Joint Work
Programme of the Scientific Groups and agreed to
merge the LC/LP Consultative Meetings' Joint Long-
term Programme with the Joint Work Programme of the
Scientific Groups.
¶6. The Scientific Groups will hold their next
meeting from May 25 - 29, 2009, in Rome, Italy.
-------------------
Ocean Fertilization
-------------------
¶7. Ocean fertilization is a potential greenhouse
gas mitigation technique that works, in theory, by
adding iron or other substances to high nutrient
regions of the ocean in order to stimulate
phytoplankton blooms that sequester carbon dioxide.
In dealing with this topic, the United States has
consistently tried to balance the concerns about
the uncertain efficacy and potential adverse side
effects of ocean fertilization with the need for
further scientific investigations to explore, among
other things, the potential of ocean fertilization
as a climate change mitigation strategy. The London
Convention and Protocol have emerged as the primary
international mechanisms dealing with this issue,
at least in terms of impacts on the ocean
environment. The fall 2007 annual London Convention
and Protocol meetings agreed to a statement that
"urged States to use the utmost caution when
considering proposals for large-scale ocean
fertilization operations" and "took the view that,
given the present state of knowledge regarding
ocean fertilization, such large-scale operations
were currently not justified." The London
Convention and Protocol Scientific Groups meeting
(Guayaquil, Ecuador, May 19-23, 2008) considered
the issue further, and developed a revised set of
assessment criteria (initially developed at the
June 2007 Scientific Groups meeting) for states to
use in evaluating and regulating any potential
ocean fertilization proposals. Ocean fertilization
was also discussed at meetings of other
international organizations and conventions over
the past year, including the annual meetings of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC),
and negotiations of the UN General Assembly's of
its 2008 Resolution on Oceans and the law of the
sea. The CBD meeting issued a statement which,
while legally non-binding, was widely viewed as a
de-facto moratorium on ocean fertilization. Among
the criticisms of the CBD decision was the
complaint by some oceanographers and other
interested scientists that it could effectively
restrict scientific research on ocean
fertilization.
¶8. This year again ocean fertilization was the most
controversial and time-consuming topic on the
London Convention/Protocol annual meeting agenda. A
working group on the topic, led by the Chair of the
Scientific Groups, Dr. Chris Vivian of the United
Kingdom, worked throughout the week to develop an
agreement on appropriate action for the London
Convention and Protocol parties to take. On October
31, Convention and Protocol parties approved a
strong, non-binding resolution on ocean
fertilization that will allow scientific research
while restricting other ocean fertilization
activities (including commercial ocean
fertilization activities). The resolution calls for
the Convention and Protocol Scientific Groups to
develop a comprehensive assessment framework for
parties planning to permit legitimate scientific
research. Work on this assessment framework will
continue this spring through an intersessional
working group (currently proposed for February 9-13
in London). The resolution also notes that the
restriction on other ocean fertilization activities
should be reviewed periodically as scientific
knowledge about ocean fertilization is further
established. Some countries, led by Australia and
joined by some Europeans, advocated either amending
the London Protocol, or pursuing some other legally
binding option, in order to strengthen the degree
of regulation on ocean fertilization. Parties
agreed to continue working on this concept and
further consider and develop it.
¶9. Climos, one of the U.S. firms hoping to pursue
ocean fertilization as a commercial climate
mitigation technique, attended the meetings as the
representative of the International Emissions
Trading Association (IETA), an international
organization that was recently granted temporary
accreditation by the IMO to attend London
Convention/Protocol meetings as a "non-governmental
organization observer." Although Climos generally
kept a low-profile, and only spoke up publicly to
read a general statement about their work and
goals, their presence created additional
controversy on the topic, as some parties
questioned the legitimacy of a single company
representing a non-profit business association as
an observer. After some discussion in a smaller
"heads of delegation" meeting, Parties agreed to
invite IETA to continue as a NGO observer on an
interim basis for one additional year, with the
request that IETA better explain how their
attendance helps to further the objectives of the
London Convention and Protocol.
--------------------------------------------- ------
-
Carbon Sequestration Ongoing Research and Reporting
Format
--------------------------------------------- ------
-
¶10. At the previous annual meetings, the Scientific
Groups were asked to develop an appropriate uniform
format for the reporting of data on sub-seabed
carbon sequestration activities, and to present
this format at the October 2008 annual meeting.
During the May Scientific Groups meeting in
Guayaquil, a working group led by Norway (and
including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, UK,
Japan, Korea, USA and Denmark) further developed a
draft format, and worked intersessionally to
further revise it. The major issue appeared to be
one of resolving issues of consistency and
differences among national reporting frameworks;
that is, whether to use mass or volume for
constituents of the carbon dioxide stream. Another
issue (though not a stumbling block) was that of
consistency across units to be reported and the
precise definition of "depth of injection" -
whether this refers to the depth of the water
column, or whether it also take into account the
thickness of the overlying marine sediment. The
United States took the position that all units
should be consistent (all flows should either be
mass or volume and not be mixed) and all volumes
should be reported as standard cubic meters as
opposed to a collection of mass units; however the
consensus was not to adopt this approach. Next was
the issue of whether to use ppm or ppv (parts-per-
million by mass or volume). This issue was left for
the next Scientific Groups meeting to determine.
The general appearance of the tables and layout is
almost, although not completely, finalized.
¶11. Parties were asked to describe ongoing carbon
sequestration research and activities, both marine
and terrestrial. Australia described its Otway
Basin project, and the European Union described the
"CO2SINK" project in Germany and the "In Salah"
industrial-scale CO2 storage project in Algeria.
The United States outlined ongoing work by the
Department of Energy's (DOE) Regional Carbon
Sequestration Partnerships (a joint
government/industry effort) for determining the
most suitable geological sequestration
technologies, regulations, and infrastructure needs
for carbon capture, storage, and sequestration in
different areas of the country. The United States
also mentioned the Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and
Storage Project in the oilfields of Alberta, which
is co-funded with the Government of Canada.
-----------------------------------------
Transboundary Carbon Sequestration Issues
-----------------------------------------
¶12. After the London Protocol was amended in 2007
to allow sub-seabed carbon sequestration, some
parties began to question how to deal with
transboundary carbon sequestration issues. At the
request of Norway, Germany, and several other
Protocol Parties, the meaning of "export" under LP
Article 6 in specific relation to sub-seabed
geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide streams
under Annex 1 was discussed. Germany hosted an
intersessional meeting in March 2008 in Bonn to
discuss this topic, which the United States did not
attend. Of immediate concern is how the Article 6
prohibition on export of wastes for dumping impacts
Parties planning to export CO2 to another country
for the purpose of sub-seabed geologic
sequestration. Given the unique circumstance of
finding sites suitable for carbon sequestration, it
may be that the most appropriate and efficient site
is not located within or wholly within a country's
own jurisdiction. A working group was set up to
discuss this issue during the week, with options
for addressing it outlined. Some parties felt that
an amendment to Article 6 is in order, while others
(including the United States) wanted to explore use
of an interpretive resolution. There was general
support for the policy objective of facilitating
such export, and work will continue on this topic
intersessionally.
------------------------
Compliance Group Meeting
------------------------
¶13. In 2007, the Meeting of Contracting Parties
finalized and adopted Compliance Procedures and
Mechanisms (CPM) pursuant to Article 11 of the
London Protocol. The Compliance Group met for its
first session from 27 to 29 October 2008 and
elected Ms. Anne Daniel (Canada) as chair and Ms.
Zhou Qian (China) as co-chair. Others elected to
the group included Mr. Mongezi Nqoro (South
Africa); Professor Hisakazu Kato (Japan); Ms.
Marinka Bogdanova (Bulgaria); and Captain Federico
Crescenzi (Italy); for a total of six members.
Consideration was given to the need to increase the
nominations for compliance group members, although
no specific conclusion was reached in this regard.
The United States was active in the group as an
observer given our non-party status to the London
Protocol. There was a general sense among members
that the group should limit itself primarily to
procedural decisions at this stage. It was decided
that the working language of the compliance group
would be English and that the Group would meet next
year at the same time as the Meeting of Contracting
Parties but would remain in contact for any issues
that arose during the intersessional period. The
Group also developed a statement on how to deal
with a potential conflict of interest for its
members when reviewing cases and how it would
invite and prepare reports to be received from
Contracting Parties under Articles 9 and 26 of the
Protocol. The Group recommended the following
future work items: a) handling referred individual
cases of non-compliance; b) studying the Final
Report of the "Barriers to Compliance" project (LC
29/INF.2) and considering how the work of the
Compliance Group could both contribute to and
benefit from this project; c) reviewing dumping
reports referred to the Compliance Group pursuant
to paragraph 6.2 of the CPM, including where
concerns have been raised by the LP Scientific
Group; d) examining reports received under Articles
9.4.2 and 9.4.3 of the Protocol; and, e) examining
how to make the Guidance on National Implementation
of the Protocol a more effective tool for
prospective Parties (e.g., providing links to a
variety of implementing legislation).
--------------------------------------------- -----
Technical Cooperation and "Barriers to Compliance"
Project
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶14. A key accomplishment of this meeting was
establishing a technical cooperation (TC) trust
fund, which will be used to fund training programs
aimed at increasing and improving compliance with
the London Convention and Protocol, especially in
developing countries that lack sufficient capacity
for adequately regulating ocean dumping. The United
States initially had some reservations on
establishing such a trust fund, but these were
allayed by the Secretariat's full explanation of
the planned structure and accountability procedures
for the trust fund. The Secretariat assured parties
that the TC trust fund will be reported to the IMO
Council; IMO will not need to hire additional
personnel to manage the fund; auditing costs will
be taken from TC trust fund contributions (not from
the general IMO budget) and carried out by regular
IMO auditors; and the TC trust fund will not
detract from normal London Convention/Protocol
Secretariat operations. Responding to a query by
Australia, the Secretariat assured the meeting that
contributing parties will be able to direct their
contributions to specific projects they wish to
support.
¶15. The meeting also discussed the "Barriers to
Compliance" project, which resulted from the
previous annual meeting's decision to adopt a
strategic approach to help states overcome
legislative, institutional, technical and other
"barriers" to full compliance with the London
Convention and Protocol. At this meeting, parties
adopted a Barriers to Compliance "Implementation
Plan" as a living document to be revised as needed
(the United States already provided some suggested
revisions). Italy agreed to continue chairing the
working group that will monitor and assist the
Secretariat in implementing technical cooperation
projects aimed at overcoming barriers to fully
complying with the London Convention and Protocol.
The Barriers to Compliance project also will pursue
the goal of encouraging non- parties to join the
London Protocol. Various parties offered to
contribute additional funds to the Barriers to
Compliance project (which will be put into the TC
Trust Fund described above), including Canada,
Spain, Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United
States. France already has pledged over USD
800,000 for the project, and the barriers project
now has funds of over USD 1.2 million. The LC/LP
Secretariat is developing plans for workshops in
various regions and publications of technical
assistance documents.
E
----------------
Artificial Reefs
----------------
¶16. An ongoing discussion within the London
Convention concerns the placement of material into
the ocean for purposes other than disposal of that
material, especially for the creation of artificial
reefs. A Correspondence Group has been working
intersessionally to develop "Guidance for the
Placement of Artificial Reefs" jointly with the
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The
United States was very actively involved in
drafting the Guidance, and a final version was
presented to the Governing Bodies for adoption at
the 2008 meeting. The final Guidance was adopted by
the Contracting Parties, who instructed the
Secretariat to publish the Guidelines in the UN
working languages as soon as possible in 2009. The
issue of the ex-USS ORISKANY (a former aircraft
carrier used to create an artificial reef off the
coast of Florida), which Greenpeace International
raised at the 2006 annual meeting citing concerns
over PCBs, was not mentioned at the 2008 meeting.
-------------------------------------
Spoilt Cargoes and Anti-Fouling Paint
-------------------------------------
¶17. Certain issues related to marine environmental
protection that are, in part, also covered by other
international agreements such as MARPOL (another
convention in the IMO family that deals with oil
spills and pollution from ships), are referred to
as "boundary issues." One boundary issue between
the London Convention/Protocol and MARPOL is the
handling of spoilt cargoes. Canada chaired a
joint LC/MEPC correspondence group that prepared a
final draft of "advice to mariners" regarding
management of spoilt cargoes, which was submitted
it to the London Scientific Groups for review in
May 2008. The Governing Bodies adopted this
"Guidance on Managing Spoilt Cargoes" and agreed to
forward it to the next meeting of the IMO's Marine
Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC 59) for
its consideration and adoption, and recommended
distributing it through a joint LC-LP/MEPC Circular
to replace Circular Letter No. 2074, issued in 1998
on the same topic. The guidance reflects the U.S.
view that the disposal of spoilt cargo at sea is
subject to regulation under MARPOL only if it
constitutes "garbage" as defined in MARPOL Annex V,
Regulation 1. Otherwise, it is subject to
regulation as "dumping" under the London
Convention/Protocol. Whether the disposal of a
particular spoilt cargo is subject to the London
Convention/Protocol or MARPOL Annex V must be
determined on a case-by-case basis, but in most
cases does not fall under Annex V.
¶18. The governing bodies also developed an outreach
strategy for the Guidance. In so doing, the
governing bodies took into account the fact that
MARPOL Annex V (Garbage) is currently being
reviewed in an MEPC Correspondence Group, led by
Canada, and that the outcome of this review will be
discussed at MEPC 59 in July 2009. In terms of
planning and timing of the LC/LP outreach effort on
spoilt cargo management, and due to the
relationship between "garbage" and "spoilt
cargoes," it will be important to coordinate the
outreach activities on both issues as soon as MEPC
has adopted the guidance. It was agreed in this
respect that LC/LP experts should join the MEPC
Correspondence Group on the review of MARPOL Annex
V and exchange views on other boundary issues that
were being explored during the review.
¶19. The governing bodies adopted, at this session,
the "Guidance on Best Management Practices for
Removal of Anti-Fouling Coatings from Ships,
Including TBT Hull Paints," agreed to forward the
Guidance to MEPC 59 for its consideration and
adoption, and recommended its distribution through
a joint LC-LP/MEPC circular.
------------------
Radioactive Wastes
------------------
¶20. Similar to the previous two annual meetings,
the IAEA updated their progress on activities in
two major areas - the extension of the system of
radiological protection to cover protection of the
environment such as explicitly including
radiological protection of non-human biota, and
updating databases on radioactive waste disposal at
sea, and accidents and losses at sea, involving
radioactive material. The IAEA reported on work
being undertaken by the IAEA, ICRP (the
International Commission on Radiological
Protection), the European Commission, and
international agencies regarding the development of
mechanisms for the radiological protection of
humans and the environment. The report noted that
in 2007, the ICRP approved the revised fundamental
recommendations on the protection of man and the
environment.
¶21. The IAEA highlighted that there has been
significant progress towards the revision of the
BSS (Basic Standards for Protection Against
Ionizing Radiation and the Safety of Sources, IAEA
SS-115 1996), where explicit international
requirements on environmental radiation protection
were considered. The revised BSS are being
developed together with several cosponsoring or
collaborating organizations following the
established mechanisms of developing IAEA
standards, the participation of relevant advisory
standards committees and, consultation with all of
its Member States. However, no new developments in,
or major revisions of, detailed safety standards
applicable to the control of releases of
radioactive materials to the environment were
foreseen before 2009/2010.
¶22. The second part of the IAEA report dealt with
updating of inventories that the IAEA, upon the
request of the Contracting Parties, had developed
and maintained of radioactive materials entering
the marine environment from all sources, including:
(a) radioactive waste disposal at sea; and (b)
accidents and losses at sea involving radioactive
material. Both France and the United States
notified the IAEA and the Secretariat,
respectively, over the last year of corrections to
their specific sections involving historical
radioactive waste disposal sites in the Pacific.
This information was inadvertently omitted in
earlier reports to the IAEA. The French sites, off
the coast of Mururoa and Hao Atolls in French
Polynesia and used in the 1970s, has been verified
by the IAEA for inclusion in the next update of the
inventory. The U.S. site, approximately 90
kilometers off the coast of Hawaii and used between
1963 and 1968, has yet to be verified by the IAEA.
¶23. The meeting noted the agreement from the 25th
Consultative Meeting that Contracting Parties
should use a precautionary approach and ensure that
an assessment of potential effects on marine flora
and fauna and legitimate uses of the sea would be
included in specific assessments using contemporary
scientific information.
-------------------------
Korea and Bauxite Dumping
-------------------------
¶24. Korea asked a number of countries to
participate in a lunch meeting on October 28 to
discuss Korea's ability to accede to the London
Protocol in light of their continued dumping of
bauxite in the ocean. The non-Koreans present were
Suzanne Schwartz, USA; Peter Burnett, Australia;
and Andrew Greaves, UK. Korea explained that under
Korean domestic law their bauxite dumping must be
terminated no later than 2015. Other participants
enquired as to whether the material and process
were essentially the same as for bauxite known to
be dumped by Japan, a current Party to the
Protocol. Korea responded that it was, except that
it is in very small volumes compared to the dumping
from Japan. The UK, Australian and U.S. officials
advised that since Japan had determined that this
activity was consistent with the Protocol, and no
Parties had questioned it (even though all Parties
were aware of it), there was no reason that Korea
shouldn't be able to accede to the Protocol. In
fact, Japan has agreed to terminate bauxite dumping
by 2015, but does not have it in their law as Korea
does. The lunch meeting participants felt that this
would provide additional comfort to any Parties who
were concerned about whether this dumping was
permissible under the Protocol. Korea thanked the
group and indicated that this view would be
provided to their President, who would then decide
whether or not to proceed with accession to the
Protocol.
------------------------------
Elections and Meeting Dynamics
------------------------------
¶25. Again this year the issue of ocean
fertilization proved to be the most contentious
topic on the agenda. Parties spent many late
evenings in a break-out working group on the topic,
and most of the day on Friday was spent discussing
the topic in plenary, at times in strongly worded
debates not typically seen at the normally
collegial London Convention/Protocol meetings. Mr.
Victor Escobar of Spain chaired this combined
meeting of the London Protocol and London
Convention for the last time. Mr. Escobar has been
a particularly effective chair during the last few
years -- an important period in which the London
Protocol came into force and the controversial
issues of sub-seabed carbon sequestration and ocean
fertilization emerged as priorities. Many
delegations openly expressed regret that he would
no longer be fulfilling that role. The meetings
elected the former First Vice-Chair, Ms. Chen Yue
of China, as the new Chair for both the London
Convention and London Protocol, and Mathew Johnson
of Australia as the new First Vice-Chair. As no
nominees were proposed in time to vote, the
position of Second Vice-Chair is still vacant, and
the Secretariat will work with the Chair and First-
Vice Chair to approach possible candidates during
the intersessional period, for election before the
next year's annual meetings, which will take place
in London October 26 - 30, 2009.
-------
Comment
-------
¶26. Overall, this meeting was a success from the
U.S. perspective. In particular, the strong
resolution on ocean fertilization satisfied the
U.S. goal of allowing continued scientific research
while effectively restricting commercial ocean
fertilization activities until the science is
further established. Like many other multilateral
environmental fora these days, the LC/LP meetings
seemed to be seized with issues related to climate
change - notably ocean fertilization and carbon
sequestration. However this has not detracted from
other accomplishments - notably the agreement on
new guidelines for placement of artificial reefs,
assessment tools for inert, inorganic geological
material, and revised generic waste assessment
guidelines. These were significant achievements
that should produce real benefits for the
regulation and control of ocean dumping in the long
term. The agreement to establish a technical
cooperation trust fund and the strong support for
pursuing activities to help developing countries
overcome barriers to compliance with the Convention
and Protocol were also an indication of the
increasing global recognition of the importance of
controlling ocean dumping and better managing
marine pollution, especially from land-based
sources. The United States is still recognized as a
leader within the London Convention/Protocol
community. Many of the concrete actions in terms of
better management of ocean disposal, especially the
development of implementing methodologies and
guidelines for testing and disposal of dredged
material (the bread and butter of the London
Convention and Protocol) have been the product of
initiatives led by the United States. However, as
more and more countries accede to the London
Protocol, we are gradually losing our influence
because we remain outside of the Protocol.
TUTTLE