Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO3068, POVERTY, INEQUALITY TRENDS TAP ECONOMIC ANXIETY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO3068.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO3068 2008-11-04 07:49 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO2340
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3068/01 3090749
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 040749Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8501
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 6170
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 2166
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 0749
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA PRIORITY 8811
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 3113
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 4532
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 1322
RUEATRS/TREASURY DEPT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAUSA/DEPT OF HHS WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TOKYO 003068 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/J, EAP/EP 
DOC FOR CENSUS BUREAU/INT'L PROGRAMS CENTER 
DOL FOR ILAB/SHEPARD AND SPANGLER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PHUM SOCI JA
SUBJECT: POVERTY, INEQUALITY TRENDS TAP ECONOMIC ANXIETY 
 
REF: A. 08 TOKYO 2843 
     B. 06 TOKYO 7064 
     C. 06 TOKYO 5962 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.  PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY. 
 
 1.  (SBU) SUMMARY:  Japan has the fourth-highest poverty 
rate among the 30 OECD members, with poverty among the 
elderly roughly 50 percent above the OECD average, according 
to a report issued by the Organization for Economic 
Cooperation and Development (OECD).  However, according to a 
Japanese expert, Dr. Aya Abe, while Japan's official 
statistics understate poverty because of disincentives for 
the unemployed to apply for government assistance, 
income-based measures like the OECD's overstate Japan's 
poverty rate.  Dr. Abe believes more nuanced analysis is 
needed for policy makers to address a long-term trend many 
Japanese politicians and opinion leaders see of growing 
income inequality in Japan.  Nevertheless, with an uncertain 
global economic outlook and Lower House elections looming, 
the OECD report's unsettling news may exacerbate voters' 
economic anxiety and add fuel to the debate over social 
welfare as politicians position themselves for expected 
elections.  END SUMMARY. 
 
2.  (U) A new OECD report on income inequality, "Growing 
Unequal?", states inequality is rising in Japan and 
throughout the OECD.  According to the report, which defines 
poverty as the proportion of people living on less than half 
the median income, Japan has the fourth-highest poverty rate 
among the 30 OECD members.  Measured this way, poverty is 
particularly pronounced among Japan's elderly, about 
one-fifth of whom live on less than half Japan's median 
income; the OECD average is 13 percent.  The report also 
highlights rising levels of childhood poverty, up from 11 
percent in 1985 to 14 percent today.  According to the 
report, the increase in income inequality in Japan between 
the mid-1980s and mid-2000s, a 1.6 point increase in the Gini 
coefficient, is slightly less than the 2 point OECD average 
increase.  However, this cumulative trend obscures the marked 
rise in income inequality that Japan experienced during its 
late-1980s asset bubble and the follow-on lost decade, as 
poorer households' incomes declined and unemployment 
increased among young people.  Incomes fell during the 
current decade as well, with the largest declines among the 
top earners, so that income inequality has declined since 
2000. 
 
3.  (U) NOTE:  The OECD report's chosen measure of poverty -- 
the proportion of people whose income is less than half the 
median income -- can be misleading.  Relying on income 
ignores asset accumulation.  Assets are a significant 
contributor to overall wealth, consumption, and standards of 
living, especially among the elderly.  Because Japan's 
elderly are a large and growing share of the population, 
income-based poverty measures and Japan's Gini coefficient 
will rise even if standards of living and Japan's wealth 
distribution are unchanged.  (Refs B,C)  Additionally, the 
choice of a relative, rather than absolute, poverty line may 
facilitate cross-country comparisons, but does not adequately 
capture the changes in living standards that accompany shifts 
in the income distribution, even when those shifts are not 
accompanied by widening inequality.  END NOTE. 
 
4.  (SBU) According to Dr. Aya Abe, a poverty and inequality 
expert at Japan's National Institute of Population and Social 
Security Research (IPSS), while the OECD report's basic 
message is accurate, crafting the right policy responses 
requires a more nuanced analysis of Japan's poverty and 
inequality dynamics.  As the OECD report states, the 
improvement in Japan's Gini coefficient since 2000 stems from 
Japan's top earners' incomes falling faster than the rest of 
the population's incomes have fallen, and is part of a 
long-term trend of growing inequality.  The recent 
improvement in the Gini coefficient therefore must be 
understood in the context of increasing poverty in Japan. 
Three characteristics of relative poverty in Japan are 
 
TOKYO 00003068  002 OF 003 
 
 
particularly important:  the high and relatively constant 
poverty rate among the elderly; rising rates among young 
Japanese and among children; and uneven geographic 
distribution that, in the current legal framework, demands 
resources from the local governments least able to provide 
them. 
 
POVERTY AMONG THE ELDERLY 
------------------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) Almost half of those receiving public assistance in 
Japan are elderly.  Since public assistance is vigorously 
means-tested, recipients have low or no income, are without 
assets, and lack family support.  Because Japan's pension 
system was introduced only in the 1960s, the "late elderly" 
(aged 75 and older) frequently do not qualify for further 
pensions from the state or their employer due to vesting 
requirements.  Instead, they rely solely on the universal 
Basic Pension, which pays just 52,500 yen per month (about 
$425) on average.  Although 96 percent of Japanese over age 
60 receive Japan's Basic Pension (Kiso Nenkin), the number of 
seniors receiving public assistance indicates this income is 
insufficient on its own. 
 
POVERTY AMONG THE WORKING-AGE POPULATION 
---------------------------------------- 
 
6.  (SBU) Abe's research shows those who "deviate from the 
normal life path" by failing to secure full-time employment 
upon graduation, failing to marry and establish their own 
household, getting divorced, or suffering from a medical 
problem or other disability are particularly vulnerable to 
poverty and likely to require public assistance.  This 
situation means those who came of age after the collapse of 
the bubble economy were -- and tend to remain -- 
disadvantaged. 
 
7.  (SBU) As Japan's lost decade reshaped its labor markets, 
a cohort of young people found part-time work or began 
dispatch labor, and have not found a way back into 
traditional corporate Japan.  These 25-35 year olds are 
delaying marriage and putting off having children, declining 
to enroll in voluntary insurance and pension plans, and 
failing to pay the premiums they owe for the mandatory Basic 
Pension because of their underemployment.  In the absence of 
family support, they fall into poverty, and according to Abe 
and others, the most severely affected individuals seem 
likely to remain on public assistance throughout their 
lifetimes. 
 
POVERTY AMONG CHILDREN 
---------------------- 
 
8.  (SBU) In Japan, as elsewhere, children born to single 
mothers are particularly at risk of living in poverty.  Abe's 
analysis shows childhood poverty occurs when an adverse event 
affects the family, such as a parent losing his or her job, 
divorce, or the onset of a debilitating illness.  If family 
support networks fail, these families fall into poverty, 
increasing the number of children receiving public 
assistance.  In this way, rising childhood poverty in Japan 
can be seen as a subset of the problem of poverty among 
adults. 
 
JAPAN'S PUBLIC ASSISTANCE SYSTEM 
-------------------------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) Japan's welfare system is based in the 1950 Public 
Assistance Law, making it the oldest portion of Japan's 
social safety net.  Built on the principle of state support 
to fill the gap between a citizen's best effort and the 
minimum cost of living, the law calls for rigorous means 
testing and requires family members to provide for one 
another.  Assistance is provided primarily through cash 
transfers, except for some in-kind public services, such as 
healthcare.  Although the central government sets eligibility 
requirements and benefit levels, public assistance is 
 
TOKYO 00003068  003 OF 003 
 
 
administered locally, including local investigation of 
applicants and significant local government financial 
contributions. 
 
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF POVERTY 
---------------------------------- 
 
10.  (SBU) Areas like Okinawa and Hokkaido, with historically 
sluggish growth, have high poverty rates.  More surprisingly, 
so does Kyushu.  Even though that island has been regarded as 
an area of relative growth, economic activity is increasingly 
concentrated in Fukuoka, leaving rural Kyushu behind.  The 
local governments in these regions face declining tax revenue 
as businesses close, young people migrate to more vibrant 
areas, and citizens age.  These same forces, however, can 
lead more residents to apply for public assistance.  Since 
the central government's contribution will not automatically 
change in response to these local conditions, the local 
government's budget can be overwhelmed. 
 
11.  (SBU) According to Abe, this problem creates a strong 
incentive for local government officials to discourage 
potential applicants from filing for public assistance. 
Since the eligibility criteria are straightforward and local 
governments are legally bound to assess each applicant, the 
most effective way to minimize the burden of public 
assistance expenditures on local government budgets is to 
discourage applications.  Because the inability to work -- 
rather than the inability to find work -- is one of the 
eligibility criteria, when potential applicants are asked to 
look for work rather than apply for public assistance, most 
understand the implicit message and do not apply, believing 
their application will be denied. 
 
12. (SBU) This dynamic, Abe told Econoff, can cause 
underreporting of poverty as measured in the traditional way, 
by rates of public assistance receipt, and can lead to 
higher-than-expected poverty rates when poverty is assessed 
in other ways, such as the income-based measure of relative 
poverty invoked in the OECD report. 
 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
13.  (SBU) A 2006 OECD report highlighting rising inequality 
in Japan tapped Japanese voters' anxiety with the inequality 
they have come to commonly -- if inaccurately -- attribute to 
Prime Minister Koizumi's economic reforms.  Koizumi's 
successor made his strategy to address the income gap a part 
of his legacy.  (Refs B,C)  Inequality has continued to be a 
major political theme, and the Democratic Party of Japan 
(DPJ) played on it in the lead up to its 2007 Upper House 
election win.  The DPJ's recent joint statement with Rengo, 
the trade union confederation, (Ref A) emphasizes voters' 
livelihood concerns, demonstrating the issue's continued 
political salience.  With an uncertain global economic 
outlook and Lower House elections looming, the OECD report's 
unsettling news could provide fodder for politicians and 
opinion-makers in the run-up to elections. 
SCHIEFFER