Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08RIGA671, Lithuanian airline files suit against AirBaltic

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08RIGA671.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08RIGA671 2008-11-03 15:33 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Riga
VZCZCXRO1821
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHRA #0671/01 3081533
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 031533Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY RIGA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5351
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000671 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAIR ECON EFIN ETRD LG LH
SUBJECT:  Lithuanian airline files suit against AirBaltic 
 
1. This is a joint cable from Embassies Riga and Vilnius. 
 
2. Summary: Private Lithuanian airline, FlyLAL, and Latvia's 
national airline, AirBaltic, are involved in an increasingly nasty 
dispute centered on AirBaltic's pricing of flights out of Vilnius. 
FlyLAL alleges that AirBaltic is using the deep discounts it 
receives for gate fees in Riga to subsidize fares from Vilnius at 
less than cost.  FlyLAL succeeded in getting a Lithuanian court to 
order the seizure of some AirBaltic assets in Lithuania in a 
proceeding that did not meet minimum standards of transparency. 
Riga Airport subsequently suspended FlyLAL's flights from Riga to 
Vilnius for purported unpaid debts.  The case even has the two 
governments sniping at each other and is an example of how competing 
economic interests are more important today than old standards of 
Baltic unity.  End summary. 
 
3. Tadas Vizgirda, Executive Vice President and General Manager of 
AirBaltic Lithuania, confirmed to Embassy Vilnius that FlyLAL has 
brought a legal claim against Air Baltic and Riga Airport in a 
district court in Vilnius.  FlyLAL is claiming that the discounts 
AirBaltic is receiving at Riga Airport violate EU competition laws. 
FlyLAL further argues that these discounts have given AirBaltic an 
unfair competitive advantage enabling it to subsidize its flights in 
Vilnius, which FlyLal believes are priced below market level.  As a 
result, FlyLAL asserts it has suffered USD 80 million in losses.  To 
secure compensation from AirBaltic and Riga Airport, FlyLAL made a 
request for the court to freeze some of Air Baltic's assets.  The 
District Court of Vilnius granted this request. 
 
4. Vizgirda relayed AirBaltic's position that the case is not 
legally sound due to jurisdiction issues and the fact that AirBaltic 
was never informed of the proceeding.  CEO and President of 
AirBaltic, Berthold Flick, publically noted that discounts on fees 
at Riga Airport are awarded based on flight and passenger volume in 
accordance with regulations issued by the Latvian Cabinet of 
Ministers, and added that other airlines, including KLM/Air France 
and Ryanair also receive these discounts. He added that AirBaltic 
has begun the process to appeal the judgment of the Lithuanian 
court. 
 
5. As the case has proceeded, the two governments have begun taking 
shots at each other.  Latvian transport minister Slesers, who has 
the Riga airport and AirBaltic at the heart of his vision for 
development of Latvia and its capital, accused the Lithuanians of 
inconsiderate behavior, noting that Latvia has never sued a 
Lithuanian enterprise operating in Latvia, and went on to say that 
FlyLAL would not benefit from the legal action as it is near 
bankruptcy and will be out of business soon.  The Lithuanian 
transport minister responded in a press release that "Slesers' 
statement regarding FlyLAL is unfounded and forms an unfavorable 
opinion about the Lithuanian company.  Such comments by a 
neighboring country's government officials about operations of 
Lithuanian companies and their financial situation are unacceptable 
to Lithuania." 
 
6. This is not the first time that the question of landing fees at 
Riga airport has come up.  In November 2006, Austrian Airlines, 
Czech Airlines, Finnair, British Airways, Lufthansa and KLM 
submitted a petition to the Latvian Competition Board claiming that 
the discount system in place at Riga Airport violates EU competition 
regulations.  The Board ruled in favor of the airlines and required 
that the discounts be eliminated.  The Latvian Transportation 
Ministry, however, filed an appeal with the County Administrative 
Court and the court set a review date of September 23, 2008. 
Following a request for change of court jurisdiction by one of the 
parties, the County Administrative Court decided to transfer the 
case to the District Administrative Court, which plans to review the 
case by October 1, 2009. 
 
7. For its part, Riga Airport on the morning of October 26 suspended 
flights of FlyLAL to Vilnius, claiming that the company had not paid 
its bills and, according to press reports, seized the last FlyLAL 
plane in its terminal.  An airport spokesperson said that FlyLAL has 
not settled debts at the airport since the middle of summer and has 
not shown any desire to make an agreement on settling the debts.  In 
response, Baltic News Service said that Vytautas Kaikaris, the 
Director General of FlyLAL, told them that FlyLAL has no past-due 
debts with Riga Airport, and that he believes that the decision of 
the airport to suspend FlyLAL's flights to Vilnius is in revenge for 
FlyLAL's claim against AirBaltic and Riga Airport.  The Press 
reported that on October 27th FlyLAL paid 40,000 Euros to secure the 
release of the plane impounded the previous day.. 
 
8. Comment: The case brought by FlyLAL in Lithuanian court seems 
more a show than anything else.  The idea that a hearing could be 
held and property ordered seized without the defendant even notified 
of the proceeding - and that AirBaltic assets could be seized to 
punish Riga Airport - does not meet any basic standard of 
jurisprudence.  But the case itself and the reaction between the 
governments, much like the back and forth over the proposed 
electricity link from Sweden, is evidence of the limits of the 
 
RIGA 00000671  002 OF 002 
 
 
Baltic unity that we all too often assume continues to motivate 
relations between regional governments. 
 
 
Larson