Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MOSCOW3356, LEAD WTO NEGOTIATOR DISCUSSES VETERINARY LETTERS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MOSCOW3356.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MOSCOW3356 2008-11-20 03:48 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Moscow
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMO #3356/01 3250348
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200348Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0813
INFO RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 1990
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 4686
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 5236
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS MOSCOW 003356 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
USDA FAS FOR OCRA/KUYPERS; ONA/SALLYARDS, MURPHY; 
OSTA/HAMILTON, BEAN 
USDA FAS PLS PASS FSIS/JONES, DUTROW 
STATE FOR EUR/RUS 
COMMERCE FOR MAC (MATT EDWARDS, JAY THOMPSON, JACK BROUGHER) 
STATE PLS PASS USTR (KLEIN, HAFNER) 
BRUSSELSS PASS APHIS/FERNANDEZ 
VIENNA PASS APHIS/TANAKA 
GENEVA FOR USTR 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD ECON WTO RS
SUBJECT: LEAD WTO NEGOTIATOR DISCUSSES VETERINARY LETTERS 
 
REF: A. MOSCOW 3181 
     B. MOSCOW 3175 
 
THIS CABLE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED.  NOT FOR 
DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE USG CHANNELS OR FOR POSTING ON THE 
INTERNET. 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) In a November 18 meeting with Agricultural Affairs 
M-C and EconOffs, Russian Chief WTO Negotiator Maksim 
Medvedkov stated that the November 2006 U.S.-Russia side 
letter on meat and poultry inspections and certifications was 
still in force.  However, he said Russian and U.S. veterinary 
and food safety experts should meet before the end of the 
year to discuss divergent views about inspection commitments 
made under the side letter.  Medvedkov insisted that there 
was no protectionist motivation behind the recent Russian 
Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance Service (VPSS) 
letters and actions, noting that there were easier ways for 
Russia to limit U.S. poultry imports if that were the 
purpose.  End Summary 
 
--------------------------------------------- - 
Meat Agreement and Side Letters Still in Force 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
2. (SBU) On November 18, Agricultural Affairs M-C and 
EconOffs met with Chief WTO Negotiator Medvedkov to discuss 
the recent VPSS letters (reftels) questioning the reliability 
of FSIS to certify that U.S. meat/poultry exports meet 
Russian sanitary standards, in accordance with the terms of 
the November 2006 U.S.-Russia side letter on meat/poultry 
facility inspections.  We shared with Medvedkov the November 
10 detailed FSIS response to the recent VPSS letters, along 
with an informal Russian translation of the letter, 
emphasizing that certification of meat/poultry facilities for 
export to Russia must continue as provided for in the 
November 2006 side letter on inspections. 
 
3. (SBU) Medvedkov responded that he was familiar with the 
recent VPSS letters and the FSIS response.  He said the 
October 24 VPSS letter was not a unilateral Russian 
withdrawal from the side letter; the VPSS lacked that 
authority and was only acting within its limited mandate to 
regulate food and animal safety.  The GOR had taken no action 
to withdraw from the November 2006 U.S.-Russia market access 
agreement and side letters and there were no interagency GOR 
discussions to that effect.  The United States and Russia 
were engaged in consultations about potential amendments to 
the 2005 Meat Agreement, but those consultations were 
provided for in the agreement. 
 
----------------------------------- 
VPSS and FSIS Not Seeing Eye to Eye 
----------------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) Medvedkov said he viewed the VPSS letters as an 
outline of areas where VPSS believed that FSIS was not 
adhering to the terms of the inspection side letter.  He said 
VPSS and FSIS seemed to have fundamentally divergent views 
about the nature of the certification process for U.S. meat 
and poultry products.  Medvedkov said that during Russian 
audits of U.S. plants in the summer of 2008, VPSS had 
identified instances in which they believed FSIS incorrectly 
certified that previously delisted plants had fixed 
deficiencies and now complied with Russian requirements.  He 
cited the example of a delisted plant that did not have a 
wall between the slaughter and processing areas, as required 
by Russian rules, but which FSIS had nonetheless certified. 
 
5. (SBU) Medvedkov said VPSS and FSIS seemed to disagree 
about whether FSIS needed to certify that U.S. exporters met 
the identical standards in effect in Russia, as VPSS 
asserted, or only substantially equivalent standards, as FSIS 
argued.  He said Russia had similar disagreements from time 
to time with the EU and other major trading partners.  A 
continued exchange of letters would probably not lead to any 
further progress.  Instead, it made more sense for both 
countries' veterinary and food safety experts to meet as soon 
as possible to resolve these differences and come to a mutual 
understanding of commitments under the side letter.  He 
proposed a meeting in Moscow prior to December 15, after 
which the holiday season would result in delays. 
 
-------------------------- 
But It,s Not Protectionism 
-------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) Medvedkov repeatedly emphasized that the recent VPSS 
letters, while having an impact on U.S. meat and poultry 
exports to Russia, were not driven by protectionist motives. 
He noted that if that were Russia's desire, there were easier 
ways to block the U.S. meat/poultry trade, such as through a 
unilateral withdrawal from tariff rate quotas in the Meat 
Agreement, or through the imposition of sanitary and 
phytosanitary norms (SanPins), such as the proposed ban on 
chlorine-treated chicken.  Instead, Russia had chosen the 
path of consultations with the United States.  He added that 
the GOR is well aware that domestic producers cannot meet all 
of Russian consumers' demand for chicken. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
7. (SBU) Medvedkov's assertions that the GOR and VPSS were 
not engaging in protectionism rang a bit hollow, especially 
in light of the frequency and tone of recent VPSS letters, 
and the rejection of product for even trivial mistakes in 
documentation.  That said, we recommend a VPSS/FSIS meeting, 
as it seems clear that VPSS will not re-list any plants until 
after such consultations have taken place. 
BEYRLE