Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08KAMPALA1470, USG-SPONSORED DEBATE STARTS DIALOGUE ON UGANDA'S 2011

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08KAMPALA1470.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08KAMPALA1470 2008-11-10 05:51 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Kampala
R 100551Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY KAMPALA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 0846
INFO RWANDA COLLECTIVE
IGAD COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS KAMPALA 001470 
 
 
DEPT PASS TO USAID 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM UG
SUBJECT:  USG-SPONSORED DEBATE STARTS DIALOGUE ON UGANDA'S 2011 
ELECTIONS 
 
1. Summary:  Ruling party Secretary General Amama Mbabazi and 
Opposition Leader in Parliament Morris Latigo participated in a 
debate on challenges to the electoral system in Uganda on October 
30.  U.S. Mission Kampala, capitalizing on interest in U.S. 
elections, partnered with a local think tank to sponsor the debate 
to encourage dialogue on electoral reform in Uganda.  In what was a 
lively discussion, participants exchanged views on the government's 
failure to institutionalize the Supreme Court's electoral reform 
recommendations following the 2006 elections, public financing for 
political parties, the independence of the Electoral Commission, and 
the democratization process.  The debate was well received, with 
members of Parliament, civil society, academia, and the development 
and diplomatic community in attendance.  End Summary. 
 
--------------------------------- 
Electoral Commission Independence 
--------------------------------- 
 
2. A local think tank, backed by U.S. Mission public diplomacy 
funding, hosted a debate on "Challenges to the Electoral Systems in 
Africa" on October 30.  The discussion focused on three issues: 
Electoral Commission (EC) independence, electoral reform, and 
campaign finance.  Opposition Leader in Parliament Morris Ogenga 
Latigo opened the debate with an appeal to Africans to "stop 
deceiving themselves that the African environment somehow required a 
different set of rules to achieve democracy."  He said that the 
fundamentals for democracy were very clear and that reforms are 
meaningless unless politics change.  Latigo suggested that there was 
a need to "change the mindset" of African leaders who cling to power 
under the notion that it is only they who can govern.  Turning to 
Uganda specifically, he said that the Electoral Commission (EC) did 
not deliver free and fair elections in 2001 or 2006, and that the 
Supreme Court rulings confirmed this.  The Supreme Court ruling 
cited fundamental problems in the 2006 elections which included 
involvement of the security forces in elections, intimidation, 
violence, lack of voter education, partisan conduct of electoral 
officials, and disenfranchisement of voters.  He stressed the need 
to reconstitute the EC to include representation from the opposition 
and said that the body should be free of state intervention. 
 
3. Security Minister and National Resistance Movement (NRM) 
Secretary General Amama Mbabazi acknowledged Latigo's concerns that 
additional reforms were needed to address electoral irregularities 
that occurred in 2006, but disagreed that the EC itself required 
reform.  He said that the EC had made considerable progress towards 
ensuring free and fair elections.  Mbabazi rejected the idea of 
establishing a multiparty EC, arguing that the "integrity and 
independence" of the electoral body was more important than the 
political leanings of its members.  He cited the appointment of High 
Court Justice Joseph Mulenga, a former Chairman of the Democratic 
Party (DP), and Supreme Court Judge George Kanyeihamba, an NRM 
member, as examples of individuals with dissenting philosophies who 
performed their professional duties.  Justice Kanyeihamba, who was 
seated in the audience, used Mbabazi's opening to express his 
concern over the government's failure to act on the Supreme Court 
recommendations for electoral reform. 
 
-------------------------- 
Areas for Electoral Reform 
-------------------------- 
 
4. Latigo argued that a number of changes are needed in the 
electoral process and that the EC should draw lessons from Rwanda. 
He explained that in Rwanda, electoral officials set up polling 
stations in schools or open places as opposed to Uganda, where some 
stations are located in isolated bush areas where it is difficult to 
verify that proper procedures are followed.  He urged the EC to 
establish a delivery schedule for election materials to avoid 
confusion at polling centers on election day.  Mbabazi again noted 
Latigo's concerns, but reminded him that considerable progress 
towards improving the electoral system had been made under the NRM 
government.  He said that the government had, for example, 
established preset election dates and times, instituted a more 
secure ballot box, changed the ballot counting process, and passed 
electoral provisions allowing 90 days for any dispute to be resolved 
before the swearing in of the President.  Mbabazi said that the EC 
was working on legal amendments to take into account the Supreme 
Court's recommendations.  However, he reminded Latigo that "just 
because the government does not accept your proposal does not mean 
that it did not weigh it appropriately."  On presidential term 
limits, Mbabazi said limiting the President to two terms was 
"undemocratic" and African democracies were "too immature" to handle 
frequent, sometimes violent elections. 
 
---------------------------- 
Campaign Financing Necessary 
---------------------------- 
 
5. Mbabazi acknowledged that campaign financing was critical in the 
electoral process.  He said the state should fund all candidates and 
the law should limit foreign resources to avoid external 
interference or undue influence.  Latigo expressed concerned that 
the current government could not or would not fund opposition 
political parties fairly.  He challenged the government to reveal 
the NRM's accountability on the 2006 election.  He noted that the 
FDC accounted for funds it used in the 2006 elections, but the NRM 
party had not.   He said the bill on campaign financing currently 
before Parliament failed to address the issue of accountability. 
Latigo supported the idea of foreign funding of political parties 
and agreed that the parties must be transparent and accountable 
about sources of funding. 
 
----------------------- 
Other Issues of Concern 
----------------------- 
 
6. Latigo criticized the military's role in the electoral process 
and said that army representatives in Parliament "always side with 
the NRM party" and should be removed, calling their presence 
undemocratic.  Audience members during the question and answer 
portion of the debate pressed Mbabazi on late enactment of electoral 
laws and subsequent late release of electoral funding in previous 
elections.  They accused the government of restricting the 
opposition's ability to use public media for debate on political 
issues and curtailing public assembly rights.  Mbabazi responded 
that there had been much more political freedom and expansion of the 
independent media under the NRM.  One participant called for 
proportional representation to reduce the size of parliament. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
7. We were pleased with the tone of the discussion set by Mbabazi 
and Latigo.  They focused on the topics of debate, presented their 
points of view, and provided strong counterpoints.  The discussion 
helped achieve several of post's objectives.  First, public 
discussion of the modalities of Uganda's elections in order to 
enable a free and fair poll is critical to get buy-in from all 
parties.  Second, the neutral venue allowed potentially charged 
political issues to be discussed with the public in a non-political 
venue.  Third, if continued, these discussions could help foster a 
tone that, if maintained into the elections, may allow electoral 
issues to be resolved in a non-violent manner.  Finally,Qhe public 
discussion hopefully will jumpstart government preparations for the 
next elections, which according to many observers need to start now 
to ensure a credible poll in 2011.  We are getting requests to 
support additional debates in hopes of maintaining momentum for 
dialogue on issues of national interest. 
 
BROWNING