Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08AITTAIPEI1601, MEDIA REACTION: CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS, U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08AITTAIPEI1601.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08AITTAIPEI1601 2008-11-12 09:31 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #1601/01 3170931
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 120931Z NOV 08
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0357
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8734
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0181
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001601 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: CROSS-STRAIT RELATIONS, U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN 
RELATIONS 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused their 
November 11-12 news coverage on former President Chen Shui-bian, who 
was handcuffed and taken into to court Tuesday night as prosecutors 
sought his detention on alleged corruption and embezzlement charges; 
and on the students staging sit-ins island-wide demanding that the 
government amend the Assembly and Parade Law.  Nearly all papers 
reported that the annual U.S.-Taiwan Trade and Investment Framework 
Agreements talks scheduled for November have been delayed, because 
the U.S. has set comprehensive imports of U.S. beef to Taiwan as its 
top priority before all other trade and economic issues.  The 
pro-independence "Liberty Times" ran a news story on page ten with 
the headline "The United States Places Pressure [and Demands That] 
All [U.S.] Beef [and Beef Products] Be Exported to Taiwan; 
Department of Health Will Not Yield." 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, an op-ed piece in the 
mass-circulation "Apple Daily" criticized the Ma Ying-jeou 
administration for giving in too much by signing the four agreements 
with China's Association for Relations across the Taiwan Strait.  An 
editorial in the pro-unification "United Daily News," on the other 
hand, said the opening of the three links across the Taiwan Strait 
indicated that from now on, Taiwan can only adopt the political line 
of the "Republic of China" and that there is no way for the island 
to realize the dream of becoming the "Republic of Taiwan."  With 
regard to U.S.-China-Taiwan relations, an editorial in the 
pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" said "unless the 
Obama administration clearly states that the U.S. remains committed 
to defending Taiwan, Beijing could reach the conclusion that the 
time is ripe for a takeover, especially with Taiwan disunited, 
disorganized and dispirited."  An editorial in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taiwan News" also urged U.S. president-elect 
Barack Obama to "seriously consider the importance of the principle 
of 'democratic resolution' in the process of current cross-Strait 
relations between the People's Republic of China and Taiwan in the 
formulation of his Asian policy."  End summary. 
 
3. Cross-Strait Relations 
 
A) "Too High Are the Political Prices for the Four [Cross-Strait] 
Agreements" 
 
Tung Chen-yuan, associate professor at the Graduate Institute of 
Development Studies, National Chengchi University, opined in the 
mass-circulation "Apple Daily" [circulation: 520,000] (11/12): 
 
"... Ever since May 20, the Chinese government has constantly used 
economic opening across the Taiwan Strait and cross-Strait talks as 
bait to conduct political maneuvering over the Ma Ying-jeou 
administration, forcing the latter to make concessions on Taiwan's 
sovereignty.  The Ma administration, on the other hand, has fallen 
nearly unconsciously into the traps set by China and it has no 
bargaining chips to strike back at China.  If Beijing really 
believes that opening Taiwan to the Chinese tourists will benefit 
the Taiwan people, why does it only allow 200 Chinese tourists to 
come to Taiwan a day as of now -- a far cry from the 3,000 people 
targeted by the cross-Strait agreement?  President Ma has 
acknowledged that the problem lies with Beijing, which was willing 
to act in concert [with Taiwan's request].  Even now, [Beijing has 
been trying to] cut corners with regard to the agreement reached by 
both sides on direct transportation and chartered flights.  Is it 
because China does not want to meet Taiwan's needs until the Ma 
Administration makes more political concessions?  The Ma 
administration should be vigilant in not devouring the bait and thus 
ruin Taiwan's future." 
 
B) "'Three Links' and Their Impact on the 'Republic of Taiwan'" 
 
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] 
editorialized (11/12): 
 
"... The three links [across the Taiwan Strait] are essential to 
Taiwan's economic lifeline, and they are vital for Taiwan's plan to 
develop itself into a regional platform or regional hub.  But the 
political effect brought about by the three links is that from now 
on, Taiwan can only adopt the political line of the 'Republic of 
China' -- namely, there is no way for Taiwan to realize [its hope of 
becoming] the 'Republic of Taiwan.' ... 
 
"When entering the era of direct transportation and three links, it 
is also the time for the 'Republic of Taiwan' to reflect on [the 
line it adopts].  The DPP must return to the coordination of the 
'Republic of China' to demarcate its national identity and 
cross-Strait policy.  If it continues to remain on the coordination 
of the 'Republic of Taiwan' and demarcate its national identity and 
cross-Strait policy accordingly, what it does, no matter whether it 
decides to debate the policy in the Legislative Yuan or simply take 
to the streets to protest, will only split Taiwan, grieving the 
Taiwan people while gratifying the enemy.  [China's Association for 
RELATIONS 
 
Relations across the Taiwan Strait Chairman] Chen Yunlin's visit to 
Taiwan has tactfully replaced 'peaceful unification' with 'peaceful 
development' without leaving any trace [of the former].  The DPP 
should therefore return to the path of the 'Republic of China' from 
that of the 'Republic of Taiwan.' 
 
4. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
A) "The Greatest Threat Is Yet to Come" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 
30,000] editorialized (11/11): 
 
"Association for Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman 
Chen Yunlin was the model of professionalism during his visit to 
Taiwan last week. With his smiles, toasts, gifts and handshakes, he 
presented to Taiwan - and for those who were watching elsewhere - 
the facade that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) technocrats have long 
cultivated.  As many China watchers have observed, CCP cadres are 
increasingly charismatic and professional, driven less by doctrine 
and more by political calculation. Part of this strategy has been to 
reassure the region and the world about China's intentions as it 
grows in power and influence - and to their credit, Beijing's 
diplomats have been extremely successful in this regard. ... 
 
"Beijing's ability to hide its true intentions and to beguile the 
KMT should not be underestimated. Like a snake charmer, the CCP 
appears to have had the KMT government in its thrall since day one. 
Outmatched by the CCP, the bungling administration of President Ma 
Ying-jeou may, to be fair, have failed to comprehend how divisive 
and disruptive Chen's visit would be. But Beijing didn't. It knew 
full well what would happen and, relying on Niccolo Machiavelli's 
old military trick, used the KMT to drive a wedge within the 
Taiwanese polity.  The plan worked to perfection, with Taiwanese 
turning against Taiwanese in recrimination. A greater pan-green 
versus pan-blue divide has emerged, with other factions seeking to 
distance themselves from the main parties, while the gap between the 
government and the governed, the police and the policed, has 
widened. Unable to present a united front, Taiwan has been 
weakened. 
 
"The second leg of China's plan played out not in Asia, but in the 
US, with the election of Senator Barack Obama. While the 
president-elect has yet to prove his mettle, already there is 
widespread concern that he will not be as good a friend to Taiwan as 
other presidents have been. Whether or not this is true, it is 
likely that Beijing will reach that conclusion and do everything it 
can - through charm, again - to ensure that Obama stays on its side. 
 Unless the Obama administration clearly states that the US remains 
committed to defending Taiwan, Beijing could reach the conclusion 
that the time is ripe for a takeover, especially with Taiwan 
disunited, disorganized and dispirited." 
 
B) "Obama Must Develop His Taiwan Policy" 
 
The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" [circulation: 
20,000] editorialized (11/11): 
 
"After his dramatic victory last Tuesday, we urge United States 
president-elect Barack Obama of the Democratic Party to seriously 
consider the importance of the principle of "democratic resolution" 
in the process of current cross-strait relations between the 
People's Republic of China and Taiwan in the formulation of his 
Asian policy. ...  So far, Obama's foreign policy advisers, in line 
with the basic policy basis of the last seven U.S. administrations, 
have suggested that "both sides of the Taiwan Strait" should 
"peacefully" resolve disputes through dialogue and have lauded what 
they see as Ma's efforts to stabilize cross-strait relations since 
he took office May 20. 
 
"But last week's demonstrations show that decision-makers in a 
"Democratic" administration should not narrowly see cross-strait 
affairs as a matter of "reconciliation" between the KMT and the CCP 
elites, but as a vital affair that concerns Taiwan's future and the 
democratic rights of Taiwan's 23 million people whom decidedly 
cannot be represented by the KMT alone.  Besides upholding the 
'peaceful resolution' of cross-strait disputes, it is no less 
essential to insist on 'democratic resolution' or what former 
president Bill Clinton referred to in March 2000 as the 'asset of 
the Taiwan people.'  It is precisely the exclusion of 'democratic 
resolution' in the KMT-CCP 'reconciliation' that sparked the massive 
demonstrations on Aug. 30, Oct. 25 and Nov. 6 and the spontaneous 
'siege' activities against Chen.  The bottom line that Obama should 
uphold to both the KMT and the PRC is that a democratic America does 
not want greater cross-strait cooperation to come at the expense of 
Taiwan's democracy and human rights and that the democratic assent 
of the Taiwan people is absolutely necessary for lasting peace in 
the Taiwan Strait." 
RELATIONS 
 
 
YOUNG