Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08SEOUL2120, FATU COMMITTEE DELIBERATES ON NORTH KOREA POLICY,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SEOUL2120.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08SEOUL2120 2008-10-30 01:27 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Seoul
VZCZCXYZ0005
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUL #2120/01 3040127
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 300127Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2135
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4900
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 5011
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 9047
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA
RUACAAA/COMUSKOREA INTEL SEOUL KOR
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J5 SEOUL KOR
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA SCJS SEOUL KOR
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC//OSD/ISA/EAP//
UNCLAS SEOUL 002120 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR KS KN
SUBJECT: FATU COMMITTEE DELIBERATES ON NORTH KOREA POLICY, 
KORUS FTA AND TERROR LIST 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  In the first parliamentary audit of the 
18th National Assembly by the Foreign Affairs, Trade and 
Unification (FATU) Committee, the Grand National Party (GNP) 
and the Democratic Party (DP) butted heads over North Korea 
policy.  The parties struggled to reconcile former President 
Roh Moo-hyun's October 4 Inter-Korean Summit Declaration and 
President Lee Myung-bak's North Korea policy.  The FATU 
Committee concluded by denouncing the removal of North Korea 
from the U.S. list of states that sponsor terrorism, citing 
diplomatic failure on the part of South Korea.  The annual 
audit is essentially political theater rather than 
action-oriented, but it does provide some insight into the 
parties' attitudes on key issues.  The Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) also submitted the KORUS FTA bill 
to the National Assembly during the audit.  The legislation 
will first be reviewed in the FATU Committee before it goes 
to the plenary.  Committee Chair Park Jin and other GNP 
lawmakers argued for an early ratification; the DP, while 
noting it did not object to the FTA, demanded stronger trade 
adjustment measures.  End Summary. 
 
--------- 
The Audit 
--------- 
 
2.  (SBU) The FATU Committee is the most sought after 
committee membership in the National Assembly.   In addition 
to many senior lawmakers, three party leaders are also 
committee members -- Chung Sye-kyun (DP), Lee Hoi-chang 
(Liberty Forward Party) and Moon Kook-hyun (Creative Korea 
Party) along with heavyweights from the GNP, Chung Mong-joon 
and Lee Sang-deuk.  The FATU Committee scheduled audits of 
MOFAT on October 7 and 22 while those of the Ministry of 
Unification (MOU) were conducted on October 6 and 23.  The 
current composition of the FATU Committee is 17 GNP members, 
7 DP members, 3 Forward and Creation Alliance members, 1 
Pro-Park Alliance member, and 1 independent. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
October 4 Inter-Korean Summit Declaration 
----------------------------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) At the first audit of the MOU, the GNP and the DP 
repeated well-worn conservative versus progressive arguments 
about North Korea policy.  Specifically, the parties clashed 
over the implementation of the October 4, 2007 Inter-Korean 
Summit Declaration -- which occurred as former President Roh 
Moo-hyun's term was winding down.  The GNP, represented by 
Kwon Young-se and Yoon Sang-hyun, criticized former President 
Roh for failing to get public support on a list of projects 
whose estimated cost, if they were to be implemented, would 
be upwards of 14 trillion won (USD 10 billion at current 
exchange rates).  They reminded the Committee that North 
Korea was already in violation of both the June 15, 2000 
Joint Declaration and the October 4, 2007 Declaration.  The 
DP, on the other hand, blamed President Lee and his 
administration for not adhering to the provisions of the 
October 4 Declaration and for allowing politics to get in the 
way of a peaceful resolution to the North Korea problem. 
Representative Moon Kook-hyun of the Forward and Creation 
Alliance also supported the DP's position, saying that the 
United Nations passed a resolution supporting the declaration 
and it therefore had the approval of the international 
community.  In a rare show of dissent, fourth-term GNP 
Representative and strong President Lee supporter Nam 
Kyung-pil said that Lee was culpable for the current impasse 
and that the Declaration was vital in restoring relations 
between the two Koreas. 
 
------------------------------------- 
"Denuclearization, Opening 3000" Plan 
------------------------------------- 
 
4.  (SBU) President Lee's initial North Korea policy entitled 
"Denuclearization, Opening 3000" -- for comprehensive 
denuclearization, opening and raising the North's GDP per 
capita to USD 3,000 -- received heavy criticism from both 
sides of the political spectrum.  Led by DP Chair Chung 
Sye-kyun, the opposition called for the policy's immediate 
abolishment and said that the plan served only to provoke the 
North while jeopardizing inter-Korean relations.  First-term 
 
GNP lawmaker Hong Jung-wook also remarked that the goals of 
the plan were unattainable at best and that the 
administration needed to adopt a more practical approach. 
The "Denuclearization, Opening 3000" plan, after its 
lead-balloon reception in the North, has largely been 
replaced by Lee's later "mutual benefit and common 
prosperity" plan.  In any case, President Lee still included 
the "Denuclearization, Opening 3000" plan as one of his 100 
policy priorities at a cabinet meeting the next day. 
 
---------------------- 
Terrorism List Removal 
---------------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) Many of the lawmakers in the FATU Committee 
disapproved of the removal of North Korea from the U.S. list 
of states that sponsor terrorism.  They declared that the 
removal was a diplomatic failure on the part of South Korea 
and denounced Foreign Minister Yu for approving the U.S. 
decision.  Representatives Chung Mong-joon (GNP), Park 
Joo-sun (DP), and Lee Hoi-chang (Forward & Creation Alliance) 
said that the removal was only in the interests of the U.S. 
and North Korea, adding that it played to North Korea's 
tactic of "tongmi bongnam," or communicating with the U.S. 
while blocking South Korea.  They lamented the unilateral act 
by the United States in light of the fact that it was South 
Korea who originally requested that the North be placed on 
the list after a DPRK bomb brought down Korean Air Lines 
(KAL) flight 858 in 1987. 
 
--------- 
KORUS FTA 
--------- 
 
6.  (SBU) At the October 7 audit of MOFAT, GNP lawmakers 
insisted on the immediate ratification of the KORUS FTA bill, 
citing concerns that the next U.S. president may demand a 
re-negotiation.  Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan argued that 
Korea should ratify the FTA first, to help generate 
additional pressure on the United States to ratify the bill, 
and to forestall any efforts to re-negotiate the text. 
Representative Park Joo-sun, speaking on behalf of the DP, 
said that his party was not diametrically opposed to the bill 
but that common sense dictated that domestic industries 
should be given transitional support to cope with the 
elimination of tariff protections.  MOFAT submitted the bill 
to the National Assembly on October 8 and FATU Committee 
Chair Park Jin announced that he would work to pass the bill 
in the committee after the end of the national audit (end of 
October).  He claimed that 87 percent of the lawmakers in the 
National Assembly supported the bill, quoting his own 
internal survey. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
7.  (SBU) During the audits, both the Foreign and Unification 
Ministers continuously said it was wrong to blame the ROKG 
for the worsening of inter-Korean relations.  The DPRK, they 
claimed, refused to accept repeated South Korean suggestions 
to resume inter-Korean talks.  Based on the ROKG responses in 
the FATU committee audit hearings, the Lee Government seems 
unlikely to change its North Korea policy.  Meanwhile, the 
future of the KORUS FTA in Korea's National Assembly looks 
rather promising:  The President, government and ruling party 
leadership have repeatedly expressed their desire to pass the 
bill in this National Assembly.  However, it remains unclear 
if GNP rank-and-file members share the party leadership's 
enthusiasm for prompt ratification, particularly if it looks 
like U.S. ratification could slip to 2010.  End Comment. 
STEPHENS