Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08PARIS1868, France's Societal Preferences Trade Initiative -

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08PARIS1868.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08PARIS1868 2008-10-09 17:18 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
VZCZCXRO2423
RR RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHFR #1868/01 2831718
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 091718Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4469
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4470
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEHXQ/ALL EUROPEAN UNION POST
RUEHMRE/AMCONSUL MARSEILLE 2032
RUEHSR/AMCONSUL STRASBOURG 0612
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2956
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 6808
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 001868 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BRUSSELS PASS USEU FOR AGMINCOUNSELOR 
STATE PASS USTR FOR MURPHY; 
USDA/OS/SCHAFER/CONNER; 
USDA/FAS FOR OA/YOST/JACKSON/ROSADO; 
OCRA/SALMON/ALEXANDER/SEIDBAND; 
ONA/RIEMENSCHNEIDER/YOUNG/DENNIS; 
OFSO/LEE/YOUNG; 
EU POSTS PASS TO AGRICULTURE AND ECON 
GENEVA FOR USTR, ALSO AGRICULTURE 
 
TAGS: ETRD EAGR SENV SOCI EU
SUBJECT:  France's Societal Preferences Trade Initiative - 
Discussion with "Friendlies" 
 
REFS: (A) Paris 1085; (B) Paris 1240 
 
PARIS 00001868  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  French initiatives to incorporate societal 
preferences into European trade policy were the theme of a lunch we 
hosted with agriculture, econ and commercial counterparts from 
Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Brazil, The friendlies have  been 
watching recent developments with concern including  Ag Minister 
Barnier's memorandum to the Agricultural Council (REF B).  They , 
agreed that France's moves to impose socially-motivated EU 
production practices resulting in elevated production costs (e.g. 
animal welfare) on non-EU trading partners pose a challenge for the 
the trading system.  All also agreed on the need to continue the 
dialogue and explore avenues for collective action. The keynote 
speech at French-sponsored food safety conference several days later 
underscored the seriousness with which France is advancing this 
agenda.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) Invitees expressed concern about France's moves to 
incorporate societal choices into EU trade policy and to legitimize 
their recognition into international trade standards for food and 
livestock products.  Australia noted that they had addressed this 
concern in a 20-page agriculture advocacy document.  All noted the 
danger in making trade policy decisions on the basis of production 
processes instead of science-based standards for the end product 
itself.  There was general recognition that the GOF's initiatives, 
often cloaked in a mantle of superior moral authority, are a 
thinly-veiled attempt to protect costly domestic production. The 
group agreed that the topic should be raised more strongly with 
respective governments and that the "friendlies" dialogue should 
continue, with a view toward joint representations.  All further 
agreed to raise the issue with their representatives to 
international organizations, such as the OIE and OECD, where the 
subject is emerging. 
 
3.  (SBU) The attendees noted that France was effectively advocating 
its position, in light of world environmental and resource 
sustainability concerns.  The New Zealand rep further noted that, 
while she was concerned about the French initiative, many of these 
societal preferences are environmentally oriented and that New 
Zealand placed a high priority on environmental protection.  The 
parallel between legitimate and imagined SPS concerns was 
discussed. 
 
4.   (SBU) The Canadian rep remarked that this is a good time to 
address the issue with the Commission as its relationship with 
France is not particularly amicable (and also to buy time until the 
end of the French EU presidency).   He suggested polling Member 
States for their response to the French proposal (REF B) and 
collectively approaching the Commission to express our concerns. 
 
5.  (SBU) On October 3, France hosted a conference on health risk 
assessment in the context of food, animal and livestock imports into 
the EU. The keynote speech, delivered by a high level Ministry of 
Agriculture food safety official, focused on the French proposal, 
which the French seek to have adopted before the end of their EU 
presidency.  The abstract from the portion of the speech addressing 
societal concerns follows: 
 
Begin Quote: 
 
Eliminate distortions of competition and take better account of 
European health standards 
 
The Community preference consists in choices made by society in 
favour of a European food and agricultural production model, such as 
respecting animal welfare, or controlling health safety throughout 
the food chain "from the farm to the fork".  The objective is to 
retain the possibility of an enlightened choice for European 
consumers by ensuring them a high level of health safety.  With this 
in mind: 
- European standards should be promoted at international level; 
- Systems should be developed provide European consumers with 
 
PARIS 00001868  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
comprehensive information and to promote the specific features of 
European products. 
 
The main ambition of this strategy, one of the priorities of the 
French Presidency of the Council of the European Union, is to 
contribute to an ever high food safety guarantee for European 
citizens in a better globalized world.  It is part of a wider 
approach also addressing the need to protect our environment better, 
through the desired harmonization of sanitary and phytosanitary 
standards for example. 
To protect and promote our European food model, able to provide a 
high level of safety for the consumer, this issue needs to be put 
back on the agenda of discussions on international trade within the 
World Trade Organization. 
 
Encouraged by the support mustered from EU Member States, Michael 
Barnier has decided to continue discussions on the issue during the 
French Presidency of the Council of the European Union.  He has 
asked a task force to draw up more precise recommendations that may 
feature in the conclusions of the Agriculture Council at the end of 
the year.  End Quote 
 
6. (SBU) AgMinCouns had the opportunity to get reactions from 
Italian and British reps at the conference.  Both said that their 
governments were skeptical about the French approach to distortions 
in competition and were unlikely to back this component of the 
French proposal.  Both emphasized that it wasn't practical to think 
that the EU could translate its social choices into international 
trade policy and that they doubted the proposal would be adopted. 
 
7. (SBU) Comment:  Country team believes that Canadian idea of 
polling the Member States and then approaching the Commission 
collectively has some merit, particularly since there appears to be 
a healthy dose of MS skepticism.  We also agree that vigilance at 
the various IOs is called for, especially given France's proposal to 
put this topic on the WTO agenda. Further, a review of IO activities 
reveals that the FAO has been actively working on subject of animal 
welfare (http://www.fao.org /ag/ againfo/ home/ en/ news_archive/ 
2008_animalwelfare.html) and recently concluded a 2-day forum on the 
subject. The OIE has a conference in Egypt later in October 
(http://www.oie.int/ eng/ A_AW2008/ home.htm) at which animal 
welfare is on the agenda, while the subject of societal concerns is 
included in the current OECD Program of Work and Budget and has been 
raised as a possible subject for discussion at the 2010 OECD 
Ministerial. End Comment. 
 
 
STAPLETON