Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MOSCOW2979, RUSSIAN OFFICIALS TRY TO EXPLAIN RECENT VETERINARY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MOSCOW2979.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MOSCOW2979 2008-10-08 03:47 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Moscow
VZCZCXRO0742
RR RUEHLN RUEHPOD RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHMO #2979/01 2820347
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 080347Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0278
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA 4669
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 5220
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MOSCOW 002979 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/RUS 
STATE PLS PASS USTR (EPORTER, BHAFNER, CKLEIN) 
USDA FAS FOR OCRA (SALMON, KUYPERS) AND FOR OSTA (HAMILTON, 
BEAN) 
VIENNA PLS PASS APHIS (TANAKA) 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD ECON WTO RS
SUBJECT: RUSSIAN OFFICIALS TRY TO EXPLAIN RECENT VETERINARY 
LETTERS 
 
REF: A. MOSCOW 2949 
     B. MOSCOW 2788 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU) On October 6, Chief Russian WTO Negotiator Maksim 
Medvedkov told us that he views the October 1 letter from the 
Russian Federal Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance 
Service (VPSS) as a request for consultations on the 
effectiveness of the implementation of the November 2006 
U.S.-Russia side letter on meat/poultry plant inspections, 
rather than an outright refusal to authorize U.S. meat 
facilities for export to Russia.  Medvedkov also stated that 
the Ministry of Economic Development (MED) is still 
consulting with other ministries regarding the September 16 
VPSS letter which questioned the continuing validity of the 
November 2006 U.S.-Russia Market Access Agreement and Side 
Letters.  He noted that Economic Development Minister 
Nabiulliana and Agriculture Minister Gordeyev had discussed 
the issue, and in MED's view, the November 2006 agreements 
and side letters are still in force.  Separately, Chief 
Veterinary Officer and VPSS Deputy Head Nikolay Vlasov told 
us that VPSS would not accept any relisting of facilities 
that had previously been removed from the list of authorized 
exporters, but it still might be possible to authorize new 
facilities for export. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
October 1 VPSS Letter: Just a Request for Consultations? 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
 
2. (SBU) In a meeting with Agriculture Minister-Counselor and 
EconOffs on October 6, Chief WTO Negotiator Maksim Medvedkov 
told us that he does not interpret the October 1 VPSS letter 
(Ref A) as an attempt to abrogate the November 2006 
U.S.-Russia Market Access Agreement and Side Letters. 
Instead, he views the letter as a description of recent 
problems with the certification of U.S. meat/poultry exports, 
and an evaluation of the effectiveness of VPSS' cooperation 
with the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).  He 
believed that the letter was intended to begin a consultative 
process to discuss and find solutions to outstanding problems 
in the current certification system for U.S. meat/poultry 
exports to Russia.  Medvedkov added that VPSS had recently 
entered into similar consultations on meat exports with the 
EU following a letter from VPSS. 
 
3. (SBU) Embassy officers noted that we still considered the 
November 2006 agreement and side letters to be in force. 
When asked to clarify whether the October 1 VPSS letter meant 
that VPSS would no longer relist plants for export or add new 
plants to the list of authorized exporters, Medvedkov 
admitted there was some ambiguity in the letter and advised 
us to seek clarification from VPSS. 
 
4. (SBU) Agriculture Minister-Counselor noted that it would 
be useful to discuss the effective implementation of our 
agricultural agreements, and USDA would certainly consider 
the request for consultations on the side letter after 
November 20, 2008.  There were easy solutions to some issues 
in the VPSS letter, including the question of electronic 
notification of incoming shipments to Russia (the Russia 
e-mail box was full and not able to receive additional 
notifications).  In other cases, the U.S. side was waiting 
for fuller explanations from VPSS about the nature of Russian 
concerns.  For example, on the issue of alleged trace levels 
of arsenic and antibiotics in some tested samples of U.S. 
chicken, the U.S. side had not received an explanation of the 
scientific basis for Russian standards, which were stricter 
than either U.S. or international norms. 
 
5. (SBU) Medvedkov acknowledged that some Russian food safety 
standards were not consistent with international norms.  He 
noted that during plurilateral WTO accession negotiations in 
Geneva, Russia had proposed that trading partners identify 
 
MOSCOW 00002979  002 OF 002 
 
 
instances in which Russia's norms were inconsistent.  After 
notification, VPSS could provide the scientific basis for 
Russian standards or eventually bring those standards into 
conformity with international norms.  Medvedkov noted that 
under Russia's current legal regime, VPSS was under no 
obligation to provide a scientific rationale for its sanitary 
norms.  However, he said that amendments to Russia's Law on 
Technical Regulations would hopefully be sent to the Duma in 
November, and would make Russian practice consistent with WTO 
rules on sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) and 
technical barriers to trade (TBT). 
 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
September 16 Letter: Crescendo of Protectionist Voices 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
 
6. (SBU) Medvedkov noted that Economic Development Minister 
Nabiullina had discussed the September 16 VPSS letter 
questioning the validity of the U.S.-Russia market access 
agreement and side letters with Agriculture Minister 
Gordeyev, but there was still no unified GOR position on this 
issue.  He noted that MED had taken the position that the 
market access agreement and side letters were still in force 
and that there was an orderly procedure for officially 
withdrawing from a country-to-country agreement, which had 
not been followed by the GOR in this case.  He expressed hope 
that "in the nearest future" either MED or VPSS could provide 
the U.S. side with further clarification on the meaning of 
the September 16 letter.  Medvedkov admitted that an 
increasingly strong chorus of voices within the GOR had been 
arguing for a delay in the implementation of all of the 
commitments Russia had agreed to in advance of accession, 
until the actual date of WTO entry. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
VPSS: No More Relistings, But New Listings May be OK 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
 
7. (SBU) In a separate conversation with USDA/FAS officers, 
Chief Veterinary Officer and Deputy Head of VPSS Nikolay 
Vlasov implied that the decision to issue the October 1 VPPS 
letter had been made by more senior officials at the 
Agriculture Ministry and there was little he could do about 
it.  Vlasov said that, in his reading of the letter, VPSS 
would not be able to relist any plants that had previously 
been delisted for sanitary reasons.  He believed that it 
would still be permissible for FSIS to request that new 
facilities be listed for export, although he would need to 
confirm that understanding with VPSS Head Sergey Dankvert. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
8. (SBU) The different interpretations of the October 1 VPSS 
letter that we received from Medvedkov and Vlasov make clear 
that there has been no coordination among ministries 
regarding VPSS actions.  The VPSS is doing everything within 
its power to protect domestic poultry, pork and beef 
producers by restricting the flow of U.S. imports.  Given 
that it has been over three weeks since the September 16 VPSS 
letter, MED either lacks sufficient power or is simply in no 
hurry to rein in the protectionist forces at the Agriculture 
Ministry.  While it is encouraging that MED still considers 
our agreements to be in force, it is cold comfort at this 
point, given that VPSS is still free to disregard the 
procedures for listing and relisting plants that were 
established in the November 2006 side letter on meat 
inspections. 
RUBIN