Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MEXICO3014, GOM SHARPENS FOCUS ON TRANSBOUNDARY RESERVOIRS - FOCUS ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MEXICO3014.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MEXICO3014 2008-10-10 13:38 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Mexico
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHME #3014/01 2841338
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 101338Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3541
RUEHC/DEPT OF INTERIOR WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS MEXICO 003014 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR WHA/MEX, WHA/EPSC 
STATE FOR L/OES KIM 
STATE FOR EB/ESC MCMANUS AND DUGGAN 
USDOC FOR 4320/ITA/MAC/WH/ONAFTA/GWORD 
USDOC FOR ITS/TD/ENERGY DIVISION 
TREASURY FOR IA (ALICE FAIBISHENKO) 
DOE FOR INTL AFFAIRS ALOCKWOOD, GWARD AND RDAVIS 
DOI FOR MMS ORR, TEXTORIS AND KARL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG EPET ECON PGOV MX
SUBJECT: GOM SHARPENS FOCUS ON TRANSBOUNDARY RESERVOIRS - FOCUS ON 
BILATERAL NEGOTIIONS 
 
REF: Mexico 2657 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  A technical workshop on transboundary reservoirs 
in Cuernavaca October 3-4 was organized to provide senior GOM 
officials with information on possible models for negotiating a 
bilateral treaty with the U.S.  In attendance were numerous academic 
experts and consultants.  The level of engagement and the details of 
the discussion demonstrated the GOM's commitment to follow up 
quickly on their August 20 proposal to initiate bilateral 
negotiations.  GOM and USG officials met on the margins of the 
workshop to discuss potential next steps.  From post's perspective, 
agreeing to open a bilateral dialogue on transboundary reservoirs 
would promote information exchange.  Conversely, not engaging could 
fuel sensitivity about foreign designs on Mexican oil and impede 
efforts to reform the energy sector.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU)  Secretary of Energy Georgina Kessel, Foreign Ministry 
Legal advisor Joel Hernandez and approximately twenty other senior 
Mexican officials from the Secretariat of Energy (SENER), Foreign 
Ministry (SRE) and Pemex attended a by invitation only two-day 
workshop on transboundary hydrocarbons October 3-4 in Cuernavaca. 
The only other participants in the workshop were speakers from 
academia and the private sector, Texas Railroad Commissioner Victor 
Carrillo, representatives from MMS and Emboff. 
 
3.  (SBU)  The objective of the workshop (which was cosponsored by 
SENER, the Mexican university UNAM, and the Jackson School of 
Geosciences at the University of Texas, Austin) was to offer senior 
Mexican decision-makers information on the international experience 
and best practices for the development of transboundary hydrocarbon 
resources.  An expert on joint development, unitization and 
framework agreements presented a variety of existing models and 
demonstrated how they have been applied in international agreements. 
 
 
USING THE UK-NORWAY MODEL 
------------------------- 
 
4.  (SBU)  GOM officials seemed to agree that the Framework 
Agreement between the UK and Norway offers the most appropriate 
model for U.S.-Mexican cooperation in the Gulf.  The Framework 
Agreement is executed between governments, not companies, and is 
intended to cover large tracts. After a discovery is made, this 
expert recommended "unitization" as the method to establish equity 
share in transboundary reservoirs.  (Note: MMS officials and Econoff 
did not offer an opinion on this framework agreement or other parts 
of the discussion.  Legal and technical experts in the U.S. will 
have to consider the UK-Norway model and other agreements carefully 
before determining whether the USG shares the GOM conclusion.  End 
note.) 
 
5.  (SBU)  Conference participants asked detailed questions 
regarding the sharing of confidential information and building trust 
during negotiations.  One participant asked whether a reservoir can 
be divided and exploited on both sides, an expert responded that the 
only way to optimally develop a joint reservoir is with a joint 
development plan and one principal operator. 
 
6.  (SBU)  Several experts focused on the legal obstacles and 
challenges to negotiating transboundary agreements as well as the 
geological potential for shared resources between the U.S. and 
Mexico in the Gulf.  There was a discussion between participants on 
whether the USG would be in violation of international law if it 
allowed companies to extract hydrocarbons from a joint reservoir 
absent a bilateral treaty.  Senior GOM officials downplayed this 
scenario. 
 
7.  (SBU)  Industry and MMS officials clarified that no 
transboundary reservoirs have been discovered in the Gulf of Mexico. 
 They added that currently no exploratory drilling is being 
conducted in leased blocks along the US-Mexico boundary in the Gulf. 
  Mexican officials were not convinced and stressed the need for the 
USG and GOM to work quickly to address potential transboundary 
reservoirs. 
 
Proposed Negotiation with the USG: 
---------------------------------- 
 
8.  (SBU)  On the margins of the workshop, SRE Ambassador Joel 
 
Hernandez and a small group of officials from SRE, SENER and Pemex 
who had participated in the August 20 bilateral consultations on the 
Western Gap Treaty (see reftel) met informally with MMS officials 
Kevin Karl, Michael Prendergast, Steve Textoris and Econoff to 
discuss the Mexican proposal to negotiate a Treaty on Transboundary 
Reservoirs with the USG.  The GOM is clearly eager to move forward 
and Hernandez asked how the USG planned to respond to the September 
10 Mexican proposal.  Econoff responded that Washington is reviewing 
the diplomatic note but had several questions: 
 
-- Memorandum of Understanding:  GOM officials clarified that the 
MOU they propose in the diplomatic note would focus on information 
sharing.  Perhaps the information sharing portions of the Western 
Gap Treaty could serve as a model.  Mexico would also like to see 
some type of indication (although the language could be flexible) 
that the MOU would be a first step in a broader negotiation.  We did 
not respond to the Mexican offer to provide us with a first draft of 
an MOU, offering that language like this would have to be crafted 
jointly, but it is possible that the GOM will begin preparing a 
draft nonetheless. 
 
-- Land Border: We mentioned that including offshore and onshore 
reservoirs in a negotiation would complicate the process for a host 
of reasons, including different and various stakeholders. This, 
however, did provide a stepping stone to cross-border renewable and 
alternative energy between the US and Mexico. The Mexicans had a 
number of questions regarding transboundary issues which would best 
be addressed by legal experts in Washington DC. 
 
-- Renewable Energy:  The MMS pursued the DOI AS/LM's interest in 
exploring cross-border and bilateral arrangements for renewable and 
alternative energy.  The Mexicans expressed interest in further 
discussions on this issue. 
 
-- Briefing Industry:  Hernandez requested that the USG and GOM 
coordinate closely before briefing industry on the Mexican proposal 
to negotiate transboundary reservoirs and that both sides refrain 
from meeting with industry until the Mexican energy reform package 
is approved by Congress (i.e. November.)  We agreed that some 
combination of joint and individual briefings with industry may make 
sense. 
 
-- Task Force:  Hernandez was eager to establish a "Task Force" to 
start bilateral discussions on negotiating a possible treaty.  He 
suggested that a Mexican team could travel to Washington in November 
to meet with US experts and continue exploring the ideas and 
clarifying questions on both sides. 
 
-- MMS Briefing: Karl extended an invitation to the GOM to visit MMS 
offices in New Orleans for a briefing on unitization agreements that 
the USG uses.  GOM officials were enthusiastic and agreed to follow 
up. 
 
Comment: 
-------- 
 
9.  (SBU)  The timing of the workshop and the urgency that the 
Mexican participants placed on working with the USG on a binding 
bilateral agreement demonstrate that Mexico may believe that either 
a transboundary reservoir has already been discovered or will be 
discovered imminently.  By engaging the USG on this issue, the GOM 
hopes to have a bilateral agreement in place which would commit the 
USG to a unitization agreement before a discovery is made.  From the 
GOM perspective, such an agreement would not only allow resource 
sharing, but could also head off a negative domestic debate about 
the "straw effect", which claims international oil companies on the 
U.S. side of the boundary could siphon off significant oil reserves 
from the Mexican side of the border. 
 
10.  (SBU)  Although the issues involved will certainly prove 
complex and difficult, we see value in at least opening a dialogue 
with the GOM on this topic.  A bilateral dialogue could open the 
doors to information exchange and provide us with the seismic data 
that we have long sought from Mexico.  Refusal to sit down and start 
talking about this could fuel Mexican sensitivity about foreign 
designs on Mexican oil and impede efforts to open the Mexican energy 
sector to fuller international participation competition. 
GARZA