Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08KINSHASA898, GOMA NOTES OCTOBER 15: POSSIBLE FARDC WITHDRAWAL FROM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08KINSHASA898.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08KINSHASA898 2008-10-17 11:21 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Kinshasa
VZCZCXRO8046
OO RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHGI RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHKI #0898/01 2911121
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 171121Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY KINSHASA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8623
INFO RUEHXR/RWANDA COLLECTIVE
RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 KINSHASA 000898 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS KPKO CG
SUBJECT:  GOMA NOTES OCTOBER 15: POSSIBLE FARDC WITHDRAWAL FROM 
TONGO; TRIPARTITE PLUS CHIEFS OF STAFF MEETING; UN MILITARY MEETS 
WITH NKUNDA 
 
REF:  KINSHASA 885 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary: Goma Poloff met with FARDC General Lukama October 
15 to receive his assessment of the situation in North Kivu.  Lukama 
confirmed that going after the FDLR was a second-order priority for 
the FARDC compared to fighting the CNDP.  He noted that his greatest 
challenge was his units' low morale.  He also lamented the 
excessively fast pace of MONUC's proposed disengagement plan.  At 
the October 15 Chiefs of Defense Tripartite Plus meeting, which 
Rwanda and Burundi did not attend, General Kayembe announced his 
decision to withdraw FARDC force from Tongo, a town some 22 
kilometers into CNDP territory (pre-August).  MONUC reported that 
fighting had resumed today in Ntamagenga, but that Nkunda was 
possibly making overtures for a general ceasefire and bilateral 
discussions with the GDRC either in a neutral North Kivu area or 
outside the country.  MONUC also reported that some of its military 
observers had a chance encounter with Nkunda, who criticized an 
alleged lack of neutrality on the part of MONUC and who stated that 
some retired Rwandan military officers had joined his ranks.  End 
Summary. 
 
Discussion with General Lukama 
------------------------------ 
 
2.  (SBU) On October 15, Goma Poloff had a conversation with FARDC 
Major General Lukama to get his analysis of the situation in North 
Kivu.  Lukama lamented the fact that people seemed to think he 
wanted war when in fact he did not.  He had initially been sent to 
the Kivus to command the current 10 FARDC battalions that are part 
of the joint FARDC-MONUC Operation Kimia against the FDLR.  He has 
since been appointed commander of all FARDC operations against the 
CNDP.  This of course included the Kimia battalions.  Lukama 
conceded that the CNDP was FARDC's first priority, then eventually 
the FDLR.  (Note:  MONUC military and Poloff find Lukama 
approachable and relatively open.  It is widely believed that he 
does not seem to wield any significant power within the FARDC.  End 
note.) 
3.  (SBU) When asked about who is really giving orders in North 
Kivu, Lukama admitted that there are plenty of times when orders go 
around him from Kinshasa directly to the brigade commanders on the 
ground.  However, he stressed he was not entirely out of the loop. 
In any case, the real challenge for him was trying to execute some 
sort of disengagement plan on multiple fronts.  He compared the 
situation to a horse race in which some horses gallop and others 
trot - the goal is always to reach the finish, but the pace is 
different.  Similarly, certain areas in North Kivu were ready for 
establishing zones of separation, but it was impossible to stick to 
the intense timeline created by MONUC that called for disengagement 
across all fronts within a few weeks and sometimes days. 
4.  (SBU) Lukama warned that public perception of MONUC was a 
genuine concern, as this can impede MONUC movement and even present 
a serious danger for MONUC soldiers, as it has in the past.  He 
admitted some of the local demonstrations were the work of agitators 
with an agenda, though he did not specifically say who the agitators 
were.  It was not inconceivable, however, that at some point public 
opinion could turn against MONUC to the extent that ill-informed or 
disgruntled FARDC soldiers might feel emboldened enough to open fire 
on MONUC.  Lukama also expressed concern about the morale of his 
soldiers, particularly when they were asked to withdraw from areas 
they had fought hard to gain.  It would be difficult in the future 
to expect them to conduct any offensive operations because they 
would understand that, ultimately, they would have to give up what 
they had achieved. 
5.  (SBU) Lukama said he continued to be willing to meet with Nkunda 
or any lower-level CNDP cadre.  In the meantime, it would be 
important for MONUC and the international facilitation to understand 
that things take time in the DRC.  It would be better to have a 
ceasefire, which is respected for one-two months, before pushing for 
disengagement and zones of separation.  He said he wanted to 
establish better communication with MONUC, noting that he had not 
been informed of the results of a recent three-day joint FARDC-MONUC 
operation around the town of Mpofi (Walikale territory) that was 
carried out last week  (reftel). 
Tripartite Plus Chiefs of Defense Meeting 
----------------------------------------- 
6.  (SBU) Directly following the discussion with Lukama, Poloff 
attended the Tripartite Plus meeting along with Embassy Kinshasa 
DATT.  The meeting turned out to be a bilateral event as the 
Rwandans and Burundians did not attend -- the former citing security 
concerns in Goma and the latter stating that their head of 
delegation was too busy.  The Ugandan Government was represented by 
the Ugandan chief of intelligence.  The GDRC was represented by 
FARDC Chief of Defense General Kayembe; Generals Etumba, Lukama, and 
Mayala were also present.  MONUC was represented by the new Force 
 
KINSHASA 00000898  002 OF 003 
 
 
Commander, Spanish Lieutenant General Diaz; the North Kivu Brigade 
Commander, Indian Brigadier General Rawat; and the Deputy Chief of 
Staff for the Force Headquarters (Forward), British Colonel 
Cunliffe. 
7.  (SBU) After opening remarks, Kayembe called for a ten-minute 
break during which the Ugandan and Congolese delegations could 
privately share intelligence information.  The rest of the meeting 
did not relate directly to traditional Tripartite issues, but rather 
dealt with the status of MONUC's disengagement plan for North Kivu. 
More precisely, the discussion focused on a proposed withdrawal of 
FARDC soldiers from the town of Tongo in Rutshuru territory.  All 
sides agree that Tongo was well within CNDP territory prior to the 
renewal of hostilities on August 28.  FARDC's presence there since 
late September has been a major CNDP complaint. 
8.  (SBU) Kayembe claimed that Tongo was only tactically important, 
if the FARDC intended to continue an advance further into CNDP 
territory, which it did not.  He said the main objective of the 
FARDC was to protect Goma for which holding onto Tongo would not be 
necessary.  Therefore, a withdrawal was definitely a possibility, if 
MONUC could guarantee certain assurances and modalities.  Kayembe 
then asked both Generals Etumba and Lukama to give their viewpoints 
on the political and military aspects of a FARDC withdrawal from 
Tongo.  Etumba said that a withdrawal should be managed carefully on 
a political level, as local officials would likely try to interfere 
or lay blame somewhere.  The governor would have to be given precise 
talking points on how to announce the initiative.  MONUC would also 
have to fill in the gap at Tongo once the FARDC left.  He added that 
the withdrawal should be no more than three kilometers. 
9.  (SBU) Lukama agreed that holding Tongo was not necessary and an 
order to withdraw could be executed in six hours.  However, he had 
three major concerns.  First, a FARDC withdrawal could cause the 
town's population to evacuate, fearing a CNDP return.  This could 
have humanitarian consequences.  Second, simply pulling back 
unilaterally from Tongo might be seen by other soldiers as a 
military defeat and could cause a significant morale problem, which 
might even lead to the collapse of FARDC frontlines across North 
Kivu.  Third, he recalled that when Mushake fell to the CNDP, as 
well as when the 7th Integrated Brigade evacuated Nyanzale to the 
CNDP, there was political fallout.  Soldiers and civilians alike 
spoke out strongly against their political and military leaders for 
having sold out to the CNDP.  The result would be that soldiers 
might not follow such orders in the future. 
10.  (SBU) Kayembe stated that not everything was attainable, and 
that tough choices would have to be made.  For now, timing the FARDC 
withdrawal with MONUC's security measures would be essential.  The 
governor should be encouraged to issue a statement, which would 
clearly portray the withdrawal as a FARDC decision, not a MONUC 
order.  Responding to General Diaz' comment that the FARDC should 
pull back 22 kilometers from Tongo, not three, Kayembe assured him 
that the three kilometers were only an initial step to a more 
comprehensive withdrawal.  The next step would be for Generals 
Mayala and Rawat to discuss the modalities of the withdrawal. 
Meeting with New Force Commander 
-------------------------------- 
11.  (SBU) Several hours following the Tripartite meeting, members 
of the international facilitation met briefly with incoming Force 
Commander General Diaz.  His initial impressions after two weeks on 
the ground were that MONUC was in a tough position vis-a-vis the 
civilian population; that they were losing the media war; and that 
military units were being stretched very thin.  MONUC's primary 
mandate remained protecting the civilian population and ensuring 
freedom of movement, but MONUC's broad deployment meant there were 
no reserves available to effectively conduct other missions, such as 
those targeting the FDLR.  These operations would thus remain 
limited in frequency and scope.  Meanwhile, he had recently spoken 
with SRSG Alan Doss, who had instructed him to encourage bilateral 
discussions between FARDC and Nkunda on military matters. 
Meanwhile, MONUC would continue to apply pressure on armed groups. 
Military Update and MONUC Military Visit with Nkunda 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
12.  (SBU) At the October 15 military briefing, MONUC reported that 
North Kivu Governor Paluku had just announced on Radio Okapi that 
the FARDC would be pulling out of Tongo soon.  Earlier in the day, 
however, the FARDC had in fact engaged the CNDP around Ntamagenga. 
Fighting was still ongoing during the Tripartite meeting with 
General Kayembe, during which the FARDC seemed to be making a 
significant gesture for peace.  (Note:  While on break at the 
morning Tripartite meeting, Poloff observed General Lukama using a 
hand-drawn sketch to give tactical instructions to General Mayala, 
who then left the room and did not return.  Key phrases that were 
overheard were "Ntamagenga," "Colonel Delphin," and "move here to 
secure the village."  End note.) 
13.  (SBU) MONUC reported that military observers had run into 
Nkunda while on patrol and had been invited to meet with him. 
 
KINSHASA 00000898  003 OF 003 
 
 
Nkunda welcomed them to approach him at any time to verify any 
information they needed.  He then went on to make the usual 
complaints about FARDC-FDLR collaboration and stated that FDLR 
disarmament would be a necessary precondition to any such move by 
the CNDP.  He complained that the Amani Process was stagnant.  He 
pointed out that he had released FARDC soldiers, while the FARDC had 
not reciprocated.  He recommended three actions to advance the peace 
process: MONUC should be truly neutral and not simply support FARDC, 
which is in fact supporting the FDLR; MONUC should secure a neutral 
place for negotiations either in a buffer zone or outside the 
country; and MONUC should ask the GDRC to announce a ceasefire at 
which point the CNDP would do likewise.  Nkunda claimed that 
President Kabila "could use a man like himself" to run the DRC's 
security affairs.  He lamented the exploitation of the DRC's 
resources by countries like Uganda and Angola, as well as by the 
United States (uranium in Katanga).  Finally, Nkunda admitted that 
there were sometimes Rwandans in his areas of control, but that 
these were friends who had retired from the Rwandan Defense Forces 
and had come to support him. 
Comment 
------- 
14.  (SBU) As of the evening of October 15 there had been no sign of 
a FARDC withdrawal from Tongo despite the Governor's announcement. 
Lukama noted during a private discussion that the FARDC battalion 
commander in Tongo was actually from Tongo and that his parents 
still lived there.  He certainly would have no interest in returning 
Tongo to the CNDP.  The commander supposedly told General Lukama 
that, if ordered to withdraw from the town, he would instead move 
his men to Kirolirwe to attack Nkunda himself.  At the same time, it 
is unclear whether General Kayembe is fully capable of carrying out 
an order to withdraw from Tongo.  Some in MONUC view him as being 
outside the President's inner circle, which also excludes Lukama and 
Mayala, but which includes Etumba, generally considered to be a 
hardliner.  End Comment. 
BROCK