Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08DUBLIN545, IRELAND'S SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP DEAL'S GOOD ENOUGH --

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08DUBLIN545.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08DUBLIN545 2008-10-01 12:25 2011-07-22 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Dublin
VZCZCXRO5984
PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHDL #0545/01 2751225
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 011225Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9477
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBL/AMCONSUL BELFAST PRIORITY 0800
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DUBLIN 000545 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/01/2018 
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD PREL PGOV EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND'S SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP DEAL'S GOOD ENOUGH -- 
FOR NOW 
 
DUBLIN 00000545  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
Classified By: PEO Chief Ted Pierce.  Reasons 1.4 (b/d). 
 
1. (C) Summary: On September 18 the parties to the Social 
Partnership talks (principally business groups and trade 
unions) agreed on a provisional deal that, among other 
things, would freeze public sector wages for the next 11 
months.  A leading business representative told us this is 
the best deal his membership could have hoped for given the 
tight economic situation.  A representative from one of the 
leading unions agreed but added that trade union members will 
be expecting "a better deal" at the next round of talks in 
2010.  Both said that the current agreement is meant to get 
the nation through what looks to be a very sharp downturn for 
the Irish economy.  It is now up to the government to 
"officially" present the draft to all concerned parties for 
an up-or-down vote.  The American business community is 
watching the outcome of the talks closely because a breakdown 
of the social partnership model threatens Irish economic 
stability -- one of the key reasons for the huge inflow of 
U.S.-sourced investment.  End summary. 
 
Social Partnership -- What is it? 
--------------------------------- 
 
2. (U) The Social Partnership process describes the (roughly) 
triennial discussions to reach voluntary agreements on 
workplace-related topics, most importantly wages.  The 
government, the business community (represented by the Irish 
Business and Employers Confederation (IBEC)), and the trade 
unions (represented, in part, by the Irish Congress of Trade 
Unions (ICTU)) participate in the talks.  The first social 
partnership agreement was reached in 1987 and is often 
credited with being one of the sparks that ignited the Irish 
economic rebound.  The government's role is to act as 
facilitator of the process and to draft and present the 
official agreement for final approval by the parties. 
 
The Deal 
-------- 
 
3. (SBU) Under the terms of a deal covering the next 21 
months, the participants in the social partnership talks 
agreed to halt public sector wage hikes for the 11 months, 
freeze private-sector, unionized workers pay for three 
months, and, according to the Irish Department of Enterprise, 
Trade, and Employment website, "set up a process to develop a 
national framework on the employment and rights of temporary 
agency workers."  Given that the Irish government is expected 
to run a substantial budget deficit in 2008 and 2009, tax 
cuts, a key component of previous deals, are not included in 
this agreement. 
 
The Business Community 
---------------------- 
 
4. (C) Econoff spoke to Danny McCoy, head of policy at IBEC 
and lead negotiator for the business community, who said that 
this was about the best deal his constituency could have 
hoped for in the uncertain economic environment.  Initially, 
union representatives wanted pay increases tied to 
"unrealistically high" rates of inflation but ultimately had 
to settle for a hike of just over four percent for the 
21-month period.  McCoy said this was slightly above what his 
membership had indicated it had budgeted for 2009. 
 
5. (C) McCoy said that IBEC would be able to get its 
membership to back the agreement but was not sanguine that 
the private-sector unions could convince their members.  He 
explained that there is much confusion about what was 
actually agreed on the pay deal and demonstrated -- in great 
detail -- that the public-sector pay pause would not actually 
kick in until late 2009.  For this reason, he reasoned that 
the government would have little difficulty getting the 
public sector unions to fall in line. 
 
6. (C) McCoy agreed that, as union membership declines, the 
social partnership model may become unnecessary in the near 
future.  For now, though, he said that "the best thing about 
the current deal is that there was a deal" and that the 
markets would have reacted poorly to a collapse in 
negotiations.  He warned that, as a sop to the unions, the 
government in the next few years, "will likely put 
restrictions on the use of agency (temporary) workers," to 
the detriment of Irish business.  However, he doesn't foresee 
that the government will enact any kind of statutory union 
recognition -- a move strongly opposed by the American 
business community. 
 
The Unions 
---------- 
 
 
DUBLIN 00000545  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
7. (C) Econoff met with Paul Sweeney, economic advisor to 
ICTU, who played a key role in the negotiations and shared 
with us a draft copy of the agreement.  Like McCoy, Sweeney 
believes that this is as good a deal as the unions could have 
reached in the current economic environment.  He worries, 
though, whether IBEC can get its membership to approve the 
document.  While some union reps have complained about the 
pay freezes, Sweeney estimates that inflation will fall below 
the projections used during the negotiations and that real 
wages will be significantly higher as a result.  He also 
noted that the document does not substantially address 
non-wage issues, many of which are very important to his 
membership. 
 
8. (C) Sweeney said that the majority of the unions, with the 
exception of the "Trotskyites," will approve this deal.  He 
said the worsening macroeconomic environment will make it 
easier to get approval because everybody wants certainty 
above all else.  However, he noted that the union leadership 
intends to sell this as a shorter-than-customary transitional 
agreement designed to get the parties through a prolonged 
economic downturn in Ireland.  Given this pitch, he said the 
unions will expect a better deal for labor in the next round 
of negotiations in 2010.  In particular, he highlighted the 
issue of union recognition as being a key component of any 
future agreement and pointed out that the main opposition to 
this comes from the American Chamber of Commerce. 
 
9. (C) Sweeney dodged the question of whether the social 
partnership process was anachronistic, only admitting that it 
would likely have to evolve into something different.  He did 
say that the recent negotiations were cordial (all the main 
players know each other quite well) but tense.  He had 
nothing but praise for the way former Prime Minister Bertie 
Ahern had handled previous negotiations and, in a mild swipe 
at Prime Minister Brian Cowen said that, "the breakdown of 
talks in August would not have happened if Bertie were still 
Taoiseach (Prime Minister)." 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
10. (C) We expect the agreement to be approved by all sides 
-- not because the sides are happy with everything included 
(or not included) but because going back to the negotiating 
table raises the risk that a deal will never get done.  With 
the Irish financial sector taking a beating and an historic 
turnaround in the government's fiscal situation for the 
worse, the government will not want to add labor unrest to 
the mix.  The U.S. business community is watching the process 
with keen interest because economic stability is one of the 
key attractions for locating in Ireland.  A breakdown in the 
social partnership model threatens this stability and could 
increase the risk of investing here. 
FOLEY