Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08PANAMA749, PANAMA: DETAILS OF PARDON REVOCATION FOR POSADA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08PANAMA749.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08PANAMA749 2008-09-17 16:53 2011-05-31 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Panama
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHZP #0749/01 2611653
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 171653Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
TO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHUB/USINT HAVANA 0098
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2514
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUCNFB/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000749 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/17/2018 
TAGS: PGOV PM PREL PTER VE
SUBJECT: PANAMA: DETAILS OF PARDON REVOCATION FOR POSADA 
AND 181 OTHERS 
 
REF: A. A. PANAMA 542 
     B. B. PANAMA 556 
 
Classified By: Classified by POLCOUNS Brian R. Naranjo for Reasons 1.4 
(b) and (d) 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (U) Post acquired a copy of the June 30 Supreme Court 
ruling that revoked the pardon of Luis Posada Carriles - who 
is accused of plotting the assassination of Fidel Castro - as 
well as three of Posada's accomplices and 178 others.  The 
Panamanian Supreme Court acted to overturn what they saw as 
an Executive action that was outside the scope of the 
Executive's power to pardon individuals for "political 
crimes."  The ruling overturned Executive Decrees No. 317 of 
August 25, 2004, No. 318 of August 26, 2004 and No. 321 of 
August 30, 2004, which pardoned a total of 182 persons for a 
variety of crimes. 
 
--------------------------------- 
Pardons for Political Crimes Only 
--------------------------------- 
 
2. (U) Former President Moscoso and Arnulfo Escalona Avila, 
ex-Minister of Government and Justice, violated Article 179, 
Number 12 (now Number 184) and Number 22 of the Constitution 
by ignoring the fact the President is given the power to 
pardon only for "political crimes" and not for "common 
crimes," according to the ruling.  For common crimes, the law 
specifically allows the Executive two avenues:  reduction of 
sentence and a decree granting parole.  Many of the 
individuals who received pardons included in the three 
decrees had been accused or convicted of common crimes, 
according to former Solicitor General Alma Montenegro de 
Fletcher, whose counsel is quoted in the Court's opinion. 
Further, Fletcher characterized the pardons as given in a 
"abusive and indiscriminate" manner. 
 
3. (U) The ruling acknowledged that the law did not include a 
clear determination of what should be understood as a 
"political crime," but proceeded to interpret them as:  1) 
crimes against the State's "internal legal capacity;" and 2) 
electoral crimes.  They cited an extensive list of crimes 
that were not political crimes, including the possession of 
explosives, one of the charges against Posada. 
 
------------------------ 
Pardoned Without a Crime 
------------------------ 
 
4. (U) Some individuals pardoned by former President Moscoso 
had been neither accused nor convicted of a crime at the time 
of the pardons.  The ruling notes that in order for there to 
be a pardon, had to have been a crime and a condemnation, so 
any pardons given to non-guilty persons were thus invalid. 
Further, the ruling pointed out that to pardon individuals 
before conviction would be to characterize them as "political 
delinquents pardoned by the Executive Brach," a violation of 
their rights to a presumption of innocence. 
 
------------------------------------ 
"Original state" not Double Jeopardy 
------------------------------------ 
 
5. (U) The ruling has a "retroactive effect" and should 
restore each case at issue to the "original state" in which 
it was found at the time of the pardons, but not necessarily 
include a new legal process for the same criminal action. 
All legal processes that had resulted from the pardons did 
not have legal support and all legal processes as well had to 
return to their "natural state."  The ruling directly 
addresses the issue of double jeopardy, stating that because 
the pardons were unconstitutional, returning the cases to 
their "original state" does not constitute double jeopardy. 
Article 32 of the Constitution says that no one shall be 
judged "more than once for the same criminal cause." 
Additionally, under Panamanian law, an Executive pardon 
forever extinguishes both the criminal act and the punishment 
 
in the eyes of the law.  However, the ruling states that it 
"restores the procedural situation of those pardoned to the 
natural state they were in" before the "unconstitutional 
nullity" (the pardons) took place.  Thus, in the opinion of 
the Court, this decision does not violate double jeopardy 
because the pardons violated the Constitution. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
6. (C) The ruling reads as a clear attempt by the Court to 
assert control over a out-of-control President who abused her 
power to pardon.  The large number of persons pardoned in 
three different waves, for a large variety of crimes, and 
some pardoned from no crime (or accusation) at all, clearly 
raised the Court's concern.  There is no indication in the 
ruling that the Court wished to single out Posada, his 
accomplices, or any other pardoned individual.  Posada is not 
mentioned at all except in a listing of pardoned individuals. 
 A copy of the ruling in Spanish can be obtained by sending 
an e-mail to Kellee Farmer at farmerk@state.gov. 
MESA