Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MANAGUA1120, NICARAGUA: BILATERAL REVIEW OF SECTION 527

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MANAGUA1120.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MANAGUA1120 2008-09-04 17:15 2011-06-23 08:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Managua
VZCZCXYZ0006
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMU #1120/01 2481715
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 041715Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3118
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 0495
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS MANAGUA 001120 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR WHA/CEN, EB/IFD/OIA, AND L/CID 
STATE ALSO FOR WHA/EPSC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EINV ECON NU
SUBJECT: NICARAGUA: BILATERAL REVIEW OF SECTION 527 
 
REFS: A) SECSTATE 81714, B) MANAGUA 883, (C) MANAGUA 998, (D) 07 
MANAGUA 426, (E) 01 MANAGUA 2313, (F) MANAGUA 287 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 

1. (SBU) In a July 29 letter to Foreign Minister Samuel Santos 
announcing her decision to grant Nicaragua a Section 527 waiver for 
2008, the Secretary included a benchmark that required Nicaragua to 
participate in a bilateral review to discuss a growing number of 
issues adversely impacting the resolution of U.S. claims, including 
the government's wholesale dismissal of claims during the 2007-08 
waiver period (Ref A).  Post recommends that a delegation of WHA, 
EEB, and L officials visit Nicaragua in mid October to conduct a 
bilateral review of how Nicaragua is processing claims subject to 
Section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 
FY1994/1995. 
 
BILATERAL REVIEW 
---------------- 

2. (SBU) In a letter to Foreign Minister Santos on July 29, the 
Secretary granted an annual waiver to Nicaragua based upon progress 
made during the previous twelve months.  With specific reference to 
the Attorney General's administrative dismissal of 146 claims 
previously accepted as legitimate claims, the Secretary requested 
that the U.S. and Nicaraguan governments conduct a general bilateral 
review of claims under Section 527 of the U.S. Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act of FY1994/1995. 
 
3. (SBU) We recommend that this bilateral review address the 
following concerns: 
 
-- the administrative processes and criteria used by the 
   Attorney General to dismiss U.S. claims for lack of 
   documentation proving ownership or that a property had 
   ever been confiscated; 
 
-- the criteria by which the Attorney General has 
   dismissed U.S. claims under Decrees 3/1979 and 38/1979 
   (which legalized the confiscation of property 
   belonging to the Somoza family and their "close 
   allies"); 
 
-- progress on resolving U.S. claims for property 
   controlled by the Government (including the military); 
 
-- administrative fairness and transparency in 
   determining compensation; 
 
-- U.S. claims languishing in Nicaraguan courts; and 
 
-- communication and cooperation between our two 
   governments for the purpose of resolving outstanding 
   claims. 
 
Administrative Dismissals 
------------------------- 

4. (SBU) In November 2007, Attorney General Estrada initiated an 
administrative process whereby he could unilaterally dismiss claims. 
 During the latter half of the 2007/2008 waiver year, he dismissed 
146 U.S. claims: 98 claims under Decrees 3 (1979) and 38 (1979), and 
48 where the claimant lacked documentation.  We need to know more 
about the criteria being used to dismiss claims for lack of 
documentation. 
 
5. (SBU) Past administrations have accepted supporting documentation 
as conclusive for claims that Attorney General Estrada is now saying 
is inconclusive.  Unfortunately, time and a turbulent history are on 
Estrada's side.  During the Sandinista revolution and the ensuing 
civil war, many original titles and deeds were lost, stolen, or 
destroyed.  For this reason, Nicaraguan law allows claimants to 
present property tax receipts, utility bills, personal mail, as well 
as statements from witnesses to show ownership. 
 
6. (SBU) To date, we have refused to accept the dismissal of these 
146 cases because the criteria have not been clear, and because we 
did not believe that claimants had been given adequate time to 
appeal.  We strongly suspect that Attorney General Estrada thinks 
that he has stumbled on a convenient way to dispose of claims.  We 
also suspect that, to dismiss claims under Decrees 3 (1979) and 38 
(1979), he is referring to some sort form of political blacklist 
created by the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) which is 
organic in nature. 
 
CLAIMS UNDER GON CONTROL 
------------------------ 

7. (SBU) Two performance benchmarks listed in the Secretary's letter 
of July 29 relate to progress on claims for properties under the 
control of the government and the military.  Of 54 U.S. claims in 
this category, 17 involve the government and 37 involve the 
military.  Progress has been painfully slow.  During the 2007-2008 
waiver period, only one claim for a property under government 
control and no claim for a property under military control was 
resolved (Ref B).  In the previous waiver year, only one claim for a 
property under military control and no claim for a property under 
government control was resolved (Ref C).  We need to make more 
progress in this area. 
 
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY WHEN IT COMES TO COMPENSATION 
--------------------------------------------- ----- 

8. (SBU) Fair compensation is becoming an important issue.  Attorney 
General Estrada is seeking to reduce the amount claimants receive in 
a number of ways, including low balling property appraisals, 
refusing payments for improvements made, and making "take it or 
leave it" offers.  Estrada's stated desire to limit the amount that 
individual claimants receive in compensation fits neatly with the 
government's overall effort to reduce the amount paid out in any 
given year. 
 
9. (SBU) Nicaraguan law requires the government to determine the 
value of a property based on appraisals made by the Nicaraguan 
Institute for Territorial Surveying (INETER).  In May, a claimant 
provided us with a document from Attorney General Estrada 
instructing INETER to use one appraisal table to calculate property 
taxes and another (with lower values) to calculate compensation. 
Meanwhile, claimants complain to us that the offers are based on 
historical rather than market values.  However, we know of nothing 
in Nicaragua law that says that compensation must be based on "fair 
market value." 
 
10. (SBU) The Office of Assessment and Indemnification (OCI), 
responsible for determining compensation for confiscated property, 
recently redrafted regulations to prevent the government from paying 
for improvements to land unless the improvements were duly 
registered with the Land Registry, or claimants can produce receipts 
showing payments for improvements made.  Often the improvements, 
such as a fence built by the owner, still stand.  Without proof of 
payment, however, the government will not offer compensation. 
 
11. (SBU) Attorney General Estrada has also asserted that the law 
does not require him to negotiate compensation, i.e., he can place a 
"take it or leave it" offer on the table and call a claim resolved. 
In April, Estrada provided us with a list of 42 claimants with 
offers on the table.  Only 18 accepted.  For the rest, Estrada 
deposited bonds in an escrow account and walked away, calling the 
claim resolved.  We are not sure for how long these bonds will stay 
on deposit.  A number of claimants have told us that they will 
refuse compensation until they get what they think is a fair value. 
Without negotiations, this is unlikely to happen. 
 
CLAIMS AWAITING A COURT DECISION 
-------------------------------- 

12. (SBU) Law 278/1997 instructs the government to pursue the return 
of property confiscated under statutes 85/1990 and 86/1990, also 
known as the "pinata" laws.  The former Sandinista government passed 
the pinata laws on the eve of its departure from power in 1990, to 
provide the legal basis for new titles and deeds to confiscated 
property that it had transferred to political supporters, or 
"pinateros."  We are aware of 93 claims belonging to 60 U.S. 
citizens awaiting court decisions that would result in the return of 
property retitled under the discredited "piata" laws.  Some court 
cases have languished for more than ten years.  At our working group 
meeting in July, government officials informed us that Attorney 
General Estrada had decided that he would no longer assert the 
rights of these claimants in court, leaving it to the claimants to 
individually pursue their cases (Refs D and E).  Contrary to the 
intent of Law 278/1997, Estrada has told us that he intends to 
protect the rights of current occupants, mostly original 
"pinateros," who are the "legitimate beneficiaries" of the pinata 
laws. (Ref F). 
 
13. (SBU) The majority of U.S. claimants are unaware that the 
government has abandoned their court case, much less that the 
Attorney General will now side with the current occupants.  Recourse 
for claimants in Nicaraguan courts is greatly complicated by 
systemic irregularities.  Many judges are beholden to the 
politicians who appointed them.  Moreover, the Nicaraguan judicial 
system is widely believed to be corrupt.  Frequently, judicial 
decisions seem to be based on questionable interpretations of the 
law.  In June 2008, one judge concluded that a U.S. claimant lost 
the right to her property because she never challenged the 
legitimacy of the title held by the occupying party.  Without 
government support, we find it difficult to believe that claimants 
who pursue their cases in the courts will receive a fair hearing. 

BILATERAL COOPERATION 
--------------------- 

14. (SBU) We continue to press for unfettered communication with 
working level officials for the purpose of resolving U.S. claims. 
To date, written correspondence is restricted to the Ambassador and 
Attorney General Estrada.  Except for monthly meetings, we are not 
permitted to meet, call, or draft correspondence to Nicaraguan 
working level officials.  During the monthly meeting in July, GON 
officials told us that that they would consider meeting with us 
outside of the monthly meetings to work on longstanding, complex 
claims.  We hope this is the case as it would begin to reestablish 
normal working relations with our counterparts. 
 
RECOMMENDATION 
-------------- 

15. (SBU) We recommend that officials from WHA, EEB, and L compose a 
delegation to visit Nicaragua in October to conduct a bilateral 
review of claims under Section 527 that includes topics that we 
mention here.  We believe it appropriate that a WHA Deputy Assistant 
Secretary lead the delegation and be the counterpart to Attorney 
General Estrada.  We believe that a bilateral review will clarify 
Nicaraguan policy and administrative processes, as well as stress 
the importance to the Nicaraguan government of providing fair and 
equitable compensation to U.S. claimants. 
CALLAHAN