Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08GENEVA773, COMMUNICATION FROM UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08GENEVA773.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08GENEVA773 2008-09-16 09:44 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED US Mission Geneva
R 160944Z SEP 08
FM USMISSION GENEVA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 7170
INFO USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
UNCLAS GENEVA 000773 
 
 
STATE FOR IO/RHS, DRL/MLA, L/HRR 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PHUM UNHRC
SUBJECT: COMMUNICATION FROM UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON EXTRAJUDICIAL, 
SUMMARY OR ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS 
 
1.  (U) Mission has received a communication from the UN Special 
Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Philip 
Alston, dated September 12, 2008.  This communication has been sent 
via e-mail to IO/RHS. 
 
2.  (U) Begin text of letter: 
 
Excellency, 
 
I have the honour to address you in my capacity as Special 
Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions 
pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/251 and to Human Rights 
Council resolution 8/3. 
 
In this connection, I would like to draw the attention of your 
Government to information I have received regarding Troy Anthony 
Davis who has been sentenced to death and is reportedly scheduled to 
be executed on 23 September 2008. Mr Davis was sentenced to death in 
1991 for the August 1989 killing of Mark Allen McPhail, a security 
officer (and off-duty police officer) in Savannah, Georgia. It is my 
understanding that a clemency hearing before the state Board of 
Pardons and Paroles is scheduled to take place today, 12 September 
2008. 
 
In recent years, Mr. Davis' defense has made numerous unsuccessful 
attempts to obtain a hearing to present post-conviction evidence, 
including affidavits from the seven out of nine non-police witnesses 
who have recanted or changed their testimony subsequent to the 
conviction. In 2007, a Georgia trial-level judge dismissed Mr. 
Davis' appeal for a new trial without conducting a hearing. On 17 
March 2008, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled on the appeal against 
this decision. In a 4-3 ruling, it decided that the lower court had 
not abused its discretion. 
 
The Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court authored the 
dissenting opinion. She noted that "nearly every witness who 
identified Davis as the shooter at trial has now disclaimed his or 
her ability to do so reliably". Most importantly from the 
perspective of international law, the Chief Justice argued that 
"this case illustrates that this Court's approach in extraordinary 
motions for new trials based on new evidence is overly rigid and 
fails to allow an adequate inquiry into the fundamental question, 
which is whether or not an innocent person might have been convicted 
or even, as in this case, might be put to death." 
 
Article 14(5) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political 
Rights (ICCPR), to which the United States of America is a party, 
provides "Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his 
conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal 
according to law." On the one hand, there can be no doubt that - 
from a formal point of view - this right is protected to an 
exemplary degree in the United States, as illustrated by the 
innumerable instances of appeal at the State and Federal level the 
case of Mr. Davis has gone through in the seventeen years since his 
conviction. On the other hand, however, Article 14(5) ICCPR requires 
that a review by a higher court must be a genuine review of the 
issues in the case, an "overly rigid [approach which] fails to allow 
an adequate inquiry into the fundamental question" (in the words of 
the Georgia Chief Justice) cannot live up to that standard. In the 
context of Mr. Davis' case, the refusal by the courts to grant a 
rehearing when presented with significant new evidence which casts 
doubt on the initial conviction appears to amount to a denial of the 
right to a genuine review as required. 
 
Such a genuine review would be particularly appropriate in this case 
in the light of information regarding the alleged failure of trial 
counsel to conduct an adequate investigation of the state's 
evidence, to which I drew your Government's attention in a previous 
communication regarding this case dated 16 July 2007. I also noted 
that the Georgia Resource Center, a post-conviction defender 
organization (PCDO) which represented Mr. Davis, reportedly had its 
budget reduced by two-thirds and the number of lawyers on its staff 
reduced from eight to two at the time it was engaged in Mr. Davis' 
defense. A lawyer working on Troy Davis' case stated in an affidavit 
that "I desperately tried to represent Mr. Davis during this period, 
but the lack of adequate resources and the numerous intervening 
crises made that impossible, we were simply trying to avert total 
disaster rather than provide any kind of active or effective 
representation". 
 
International law requires Governments to provide a defendant 
accused of a serious crime with legal counsel without payment by him 
if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it (Article 14(3)(d) 
ICCPR). Where such public defense is provided to an indigent 
defendant, it must live up to the requirement that the accused shall 
have "adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his 
defense" (Article 14(3)(b) ICCPR). As stated by the UN Human Rights 
Committee, "[w]hen an accused is represented by assigned counsel, 
the authorities [...] have a special duty to take measures to ensure 
that the accused is effectively represented (Kelly v. Jamaica 
(253/1987), 8 April 1991, Report of the HRC, (A/46/40), 1991, at 
248, para. 5.10)." In the present case there are grounds for concern 
that poor legal representation afforded to Mr. Davis since 1989 has 
denied him both the right to a fair trial and the right to 
effectively appeal against conviction and the death sentence. 
In light of these serious and pressing concerns, based upon human 
rights norms recognized by the international community, I would 
respectfully request Your Excellency's Government to take all 
necessary steps to avoid executions that would be inconsistent with 
accepted standards of international human rights law. I urge your 
Excellency's Government to put Mr. Davis execution on hold in light 
of the above facts with a view to commuting his death sentence. 
In closing I wish to reiterate two points. The first is that, 
despite receiving a significant number of complaints in relation to 
the carrying out of the death sentence in the United States, I have 
only rarely acted on these complaints. In this instance I firmly 
believe that the case merits this urgent appeal and warrants 
immediate action on the part of the U.S. Government. The second is 
that I take no position either for or against the death penalty but 
act only when it seems clear that the risk of injustice is such that 
internationally accepted standards will be violated in the absence 
of urgent intervention by the Government. 
 
Since I am expected to report on this case to the UN Human Rights 
Council, I would be grateful for your cooperation and your 
observations. In addition to an expeditious first reply, I would 
greatly appreciate being informed about further developments in this 
case. I undertake to ensure that your Government's response is 
accurately reflected in the report I will submit to the UN Human 
Rights Council for its consideration. 
 
Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest 
consideration. 
 
Philip Alston Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or 
arbitrary executions 
 
End Text 
 
 
NNNN