Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08BAGHDAD2900, RRT ERBIL: ONE IRAQ: THE JUDICIARY CROSSES THE GREAT DIVIDE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BAGHDAD2900.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08BAGHDAD2900 2008-09-08 15:12 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Baghdad
VZCZCXRO7759
PP RUEHBC RUEHDA RUEHDE RUEHIHL RUEHKUK
DE RUEHGB #2900/01 2521512
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 081512Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9302
INFO RUCNRAQ/IRAQ COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BAGHDAD 002900 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL KJUS PINR IZ
SUBJECT: RRT ERBIL: ONE IRAQ: THE JUDICIARY CROSSES THE GREAT DIVIDE 
 
FOR USG ONLY. NOT FOR INTERNET DISRIBUTION. 
 
This is an Erbil Regional Reconstruction Team (RRT) cable. 
1. (SBU) Summary: Chief Justice Medhat on August 29 led a delegation 
of nine judges from the Iraq High Judicial Council (HJC) to meet 
with thirteen judges from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq who were 
selected by the Kurdistan Judicial Council (KJC).  This was the 
first meeting between representatives of the national judiciary and 
judges in the Kurdistan Region since the Kurdistan Region attained 
autonomy in 1991.  The meeting was sponsored by a local NGO with 
funding from the International Republican Institute (IRI) and 
facilitated by the Rule of Law (ROL) coordinator at RRT Erbil. 
2. (SBU) The forum covered communication between federal and 
regional justices; the current structure of the regional judiciary; 
harmonization between the federal judiciary and the regional 
judiciary; and coordination of prosecution, execution of judgments 
and the administration of justice at the federal and regional 
levels.  A Memorandum of Understanding signed at the conclusion 
commits to continued dialogue on the subjects covered at the forum. 
More importantly, concrete results emerged shortly thereafter, with 
an indication that Judge Medhat was working to help include Kurdish 
Judges on the HJC.  The Erbil RRT is encouraging our Kurdish 
colleagues to seize this opportunity.  This meeting, and the 
follow-up it generates, represent important steps in consolidating a 
coherent and effective legal framework for all regions of Iraq.  End 
Summary. 
First Meeting of national and Kurdistan judges since 1991 
---------------------- ----------------- ------------ 
3. (U) On August 29, 2008 Chief Justice Medhat led a delegation of 
nine judges from the Iraq High Judicial Council (HJC) to meet with 
thirteen judges from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq that were selected 
by the Kurdistan Judicial Council (KJC).  This was the first meeting 
between representatives of the national judiciary and judges in the 
Kurdistan Region since the Kurdistan Region began autonomous 
government in 1991.  The meeting was sponsored by a local NGO with 
funding from the International Republican Institute (IRI) and 
facilitated by the ROL adviser at Erbil RRT. 
4. (U) The forum covered four topics: 1) communication between 
federal and regional justices; 2) the current structure of the 
regional judiciary; 3) harmonization between the federal judiciary 
and the regional judiciary; and 4) coordination of prosecution, 
execution of judgments and the administration of justice at the 
federal and regional levels. 
MAIN DISCUSSION POINTS 
--------------------- 
5. (U) The judges discussed both electronic and courier-type 
communication between federal and regional justices.  While several 
noted that electronic communication could be relatively secure, 
others resisted over-reliance on this because of the Iraqi legal 
system's dependence on seals and original signatures.  This topic 
was noteworthy in that the goal of creating a secure line of 
communication was presumed in spite of the long separation.  The two 
bodies agreed to dedicate personnel to work on this issue. 
6. (SBU) On the current structure of the regional judiciary, Chief 
Justice Medhat informed the group that he had just attended a 
meeting in Switzerland to explore the nature of the judiciary in a 
federal Iraqi state.  (Note: no specific information on this meeting 
was available to the Erbil RRTOffs).  Unfortunately, the organizers 
of the event invited the regional Minister of Justice to the meeting 
rather than the head of the regional judicial council.  (Comment: 
Although in this case the meeting was reportedly very positive, 
international actors will need to exercise care in order to avoid 
inadvertently undermining the independence of the judiciary in the 
region.)  The Chief Justice spoke at length about the importance of 
regions in the Iraqi Constitutions and the need to empower them, and 
called for a delineation of jurisdiction.  The Chief Justice also 
cleared his visit to the forum with KRG President Barzani, however, 
which suggests that the independence of the regional judiciary 
remains politically sensitive and the linkage between regional and 
national courts will need political buy-in.  To this end, the 
drafting of the regional constitution and revision of the national 
constitution merits close scrutiny vis a vis its impact on judicial 
independence. 
7. (SBU) The longest discussion on a criminal law issue was on the 
execution of a Memorandum of Arrest issued by the national judiciary 
in the Kurdistan region.  In sum, the judges agreed to additional 
discussions on the procedural issues related to the prosecution of 
criminal cases that spanned provincial and regional boundaries. 
8. (SBU) Regional judges directed much discussion toward their 
concern over training and pay scales.  Several noted that regional 
judges have not had access to international or national training and 
funding since 1991; while the reasons for this were not apparent, 
Medhat said the regional executive had sent several invitations to 
regional judges since 2003.  Ultimately, the regional judges 
requested assistance from the HJC in harmonizing regional and 
national pay scales. (Note: pay scales for national judges are 
several times those of regional judges in similar positions.  On the 
other hand, regional judges generally enjoy better security and 
working conditions.)  Medhat expressed empathy and noted that some 
regional judges had requested re-assignment to the national system 
 
BAGHDAD 00002900  002 OF 002 
 
 
for the superior pay, but stressed that pay and security are 
currently concerns for the regional government.  Participants also 
commented that administrative strengthening programs at the HJC in 
Baghdad may become available to the KJC. 
UNITY WITHIN AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY 
-------------- ----------------------- 
9. (SBU) Several judges worried that political and security pressure 
in both Baghdad and Erbil could threaten judicial independence. 
Medhat repeatedly called for unity within an independent judiciary. 
He elaborated on the unique nature of regions within the cultural 
and constitutional context of Iraq, and said that "all regions" 
should have regional judicial councils that ultimately harmonize 
under the HJC.   The Chief Justice outlined a potential Iraqi 
justice system that includes several regional councils linked under 
the HJC. 
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND FOLLOW-UP 
--------------------- -------------------- 
10. (U) A short Memorandum of Understanding between the HJC and the 
KJC commits to continued dialogue on the subjects of the forum.  The 
forum's closing comments included specific assurances that the 
national judiciary would include regional judges in professional 
development opportunities and institutions, specifically mentioning 
the planned Judicial Education and Development Institute. 
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT 
--------------------- 
 
11. (SBU) Comment:  According to writings by Chief Justice Medhat, 
the Baathist regime began undermining the independence of the 
judiciary starting in the late 1950s.  Because the judiciary was 
difficult to control, the Baathists sidelined the courts and pushed 
investigative functions towards the police.  At the same time, the 
selection and training of new judges came under the executive in 
order to apply policy direction to new judges.  Prior to 1991, the 
bulk of the area now referred to as the Kurdistan Region was 
judicially administered as an appellate district.  After gaining 
autonomy, the Kurdistan Region in 1992 modeled its judicial 
structure on that of the GOI at the time, with the judiciary managed 
by the regional Minister of Justice.  The regional minister 
initially was an experienced judge and the structure retained a high 
degree of respect, but over time, party influence and isolation from 
professional training and external accountability took their toll. 
Several judges at the forum noted that the regional judiciary is 
still struggling with these issues even though the Kurdistan 
National Assembly passed the Judicial Powers Law (JPL) in November 
2007.  The JPL created an independent judicial council in the 
Kurdistan Region similar to the national HJC. 
 
12. (SBU) Comment Cont'd: The judges' perceived inability to exert 
constitutional and legislative power through the formal judicial 
system is a fundamental challenge for Rule of Law programming 
nationally, since most maturity models measure the extent to which 
disputes are resolved through the courts.  Judges from the HJC and 
KJC agreed to improved coordination, but progress may be slow 
without international support.  Absent such help, Iraq's political 
leadership is likely to resist a judicial system that can directly 
deliberate on sensitive topics such as party involvement in 
governance, binding interpretations of the constitutional, and 
disputes between different levels of government.  END COMMENT