Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08TOKYO2219, OVER-REGULATION TAKES AIR OUT OF WIND ENERGY MARKET

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO2219.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08TOKYO2219 2008-08-12 23:47 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO9078
RR RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2219/01 2252347
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 122347Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6539
INFO RHMCSUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 3105
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 9361
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 7533
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 9942
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 1729
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 0542
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 3388
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 002219 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER AND BEEMAN 
USDOC FOR 4410/ITA/MAC/OJ 
GENEVA FOR USTR 
 
E.O. 12598: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG ECON SENV JA
SUBJECT: OVER-REGULATION TAKES AIR OUT OF WIND ENERGY MARKET 
 
Sensitive But Unclassified.  Not for the Internet 
 
1.  (SBU) SUMMARY: A poorly-targeted subsidy and overlapping 
regulatory authority between the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure 
and Transport (MLIT) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 
(METI) hamper Japan's wind energy market, according to industry 
sources.  As the cost and approval-time burden on industry 
increases, Japan will face difficulty meeting its long-term target 
for wind energy.  GE is seeking to have the standards issue raised 
in this year's regulatory reform talks.  END SUMMARY. 
 
2.  (SBU) General Electric (GE) Vice President for Government 
Relations Vivian Tokai described three obstacles confronting the 
firm's operations in Japan in a meeting August 7.  First, a GOJ 
subsidy for wind projects targets environmental specifications that 
are not cost-effective.  METI's Agency for Natural Resources & 
Energy and the New Energy & Industrial Technology Development 
Organization (NEDO) cover one-third (for commercial projects) to 
one-half (for non-commercial projects) of the installation costs on 
wind turbines.  Eighty percent of this subsidy is available 
automatically, with an additional ten percent available for turbines 
that are lightening-proof and another ten percent available for 
turbines that are wind-pressure proof (for instance, able to 
withstand typhoons). 
 
3.  (SBU) GE's turbines do not meet the wind-pressure specification, 
so it receives, at most, 90% of the available subsidy.  Vestas of 
Denmark, with the largest share of the Japanese market (23% compared 
to GE's 21%), modified its design to meet the wind-pressure 
specifications, but GE, which sells at most 200 turbines/year in 
Japan, has not found it cost effective to do so. 
 
4.  (SBU) GE is currently the only U.S. manufacturer in the Japanese 
market.  It first approached the Embassy on the subsidies issue in 
2006.  Since then, however, the subsidy has not been a priority for 
GE because its product is price competitive.  However, GE's 
representatives note the rationale for the subsidy is unclear. 
Japan's major turbine manufacturers (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, 
Subaru, Japan Steel Works) are now manufacturing exclusively for the 
export market, so they are not gaining market advantage.  Instead, 
the subsidy seems to incentivize an unnecessary standard, as the 
basis for the additional wind-proofing requirement is not 
well-developed. 
 
5.  (SBU) Two larger issues face GE and the Japanese wind energy 
market as a whole which relate to building standards for wind 
projects.  First, following a June 2007 revision of Japan's Building 
Standards Law, MLIT began applying a strict interpretation of a 
requirement for building materials for the tower structures that 
support the turbines to meet Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS). 
Prior to this, MLIT-designated organizations could approve foreign 
materials as JIS-equivalent, but now the material suppliers must 
conform to JIS or receive special approval from the MLIT Minister. 
According to GE, this can add as much as ten months to the approval 
process. 
 
6.  (SBU) GE has also approached FCS on this issue, and the 
Minister-Counselor for Commercial Affairs contacted the Director of 
MLIT's Building Guidance Division in March 2008 to encourage 
approval of JIS-equivalent standards and request information on 
possible reasons why MLIT-designated quality assessment 
organizations would not approve widely-used standards that are 
equivalent to JIS.  FCS brokered a meeting between GE and MLIT on 
April 4.  FCS understands some domestic wind-power developers have 
since applied and been granted MLIT approval to construct wind 
turbine structures using non-JIS materials.  GE will supply the 
turbines for these projects.  MLIT has since held two workshops for 
industry to explain the new procedures.  GE sources turbines for the 
Japanese market from their German subsidiary (formerly Tacke). 
 
7.  (SBU) GE's more serious concern is the fact that regulation of 
wind power plants fall under two ministries, MLIT and METI.  On July 
30, the Electricity Safety Division of METI's Nuclear Safety Agency 
(which also regulates wind power producers under Japan's Electric 
Enterprise Law) issued a report citing new NEDO Guidelines for Wind 
Power Generation. Specifically, the guidelines call for 
establishment of a method to assess risk based on geographic 
considerations, wind turbulence and protection against lightening 
 
TOKYO 00002219  002 OF 002 
 
 
strikes. GE is concerned a potential change in regulations based on 
these guidelines could affect existing contracts in production.  The 
chief concern is that Japan is the only economy which regulates wind 
turbines as both a power plant (the turbine, which is covered under 
METI regulations) and a construction project (the tower, regulated 
by MLIT.)  Meanwhile, no single agency is charged with assessing the 
safety of the wind power plant structure as a whole. 
 
8.  (SBU) In GE's assessment, these issues are not traditional 
market access or national preference issues as much as regulations 
that add to the cost of doing business in Japan.  GE also notes that 
these issues will hinder Japan's ability to meet its targets for 
wind power.  The GOJ has resolved to raise its capacity for wind 
power generation from 930 MW in 2005 to 4.1 GW by 2020 and 5.5 GW by 
2030.  The subsidy and regulatory issues, therefore, seem 
inconsistent with GOJ efforts to increase production of renewable 
energy.  GE has asked that the standards issue be raised in the 
regulatory reform talks. 
 
SCHIEFFER