Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08LONDON2036, IMO: SUB-COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF NAVIGATION,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON2036.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08LONDON2036 2008-08-05 11:52 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy London
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLO #2036/01 2181152
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051152Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9404
INFO RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-001/CG-ACO-I//
RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-094/CG-2/CG-5/CG-52//
RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-521/CG-522/CG-523//
RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-534/CG-541/CG-544//
RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CG-545/CG-543/CG-62/CG-7M//
UNCLAS LONDON 002036 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE PLEASE PASS TO DOD, DOJ, NOAA, FCC, AND MARAD 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: AORC EWWT PHSA SENV UK KTIA
 
SUBJECT: IMO: SUB-COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF NAVIGATION, 
REPORT OF THE 54TH SESSION, LONDON, JUNE 30 TO 
JULY 4, 2008 
 
1. SUMMARY: The 54th session of the Sub-Committee (S/C) 
on Safety of Navigation (NAV 54) was held from June 30 to 
July 4 2008, under the chairmanship of Mr. K. Polderman 
(Netherlands). The session was attended by 65 member 
governments, one associate member government, one IMO 
non-member, and 25 United Nations, intergovernmental and 
nongovernmental organizations. The S/C unanimously 
elected Mr. J. M. Sollosi (United States) as the new 
chairman and elected Mr. Raja Datuk Malik (Malaysia) as 
the new vice-chairman for 2009. All U.S. objectives were 
achieved. Major accomplishments of NAV 54 were: the Sub- 
Committee approved U.S. proposals to establish a seasonal 
Area To Be Avoided (ATBA) in the Great South Channel, 
amendments to the traffic separation scheme (TSS) in the 
approach to Boston and establishment of an ATBA and two 
No Anchoring Areas (NAAs) in the vicinity of a planned 
deepwater port; the Sub-Committee approved a draft 
strategy for e-navigation and a draft framework for 
implementing the strategy; the Sub-Committee approved 
draft amendments to Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 
regulation V/19 to establish type and tonnage of ships 
and entry into force dates for mandatory carriage of 
Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS); 
the Sub-Committee prepared a draft Maritime Safety 
Committee (MSC) resolution on the responsibilities of 
ships involved in protests on high seas; and approved 
draft amendments to SOLAS regulation V/19 to reflect a 
new carriage requirement for a bridge navigational watch 
alarm system (BNWAS). END SUMMARY. 
 
Routing of ships, ship reporting and related matters 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
2. The Sub-Committee approved 14 new or amended ships' 
routing or reporting measures, including U.S. proposals 
to establish a seasonal Area To Be Avoided (ATBA) in the 
Great South Channel off the Massachusetts coast, 
amendments to the Traffic Separation Scheme in the 
approach to Boston and an ATBA and two No Anchoring Areas 
in the vicinity of the proposed Excelerate Northeast 
Gateway Energy Bridge. The S/C approved amendments to the 
existing ship reporting system for the Papahanaumokuakea 
Marine National Monument to simplify the coordinates of 
the boundaries to facilitate use and compliance by 
mariners. MSC is invited to adopt these proposals. The 
S/C considered the issue of the increasing number of 
mandatory reporting systems and whether automatic 
identification system (AIS) or long range identification 
and tracking (LRIT) could be used to satisfy the 
reporting requirements in such systems. The S/C agreed 
AIS and LRIT could not in all instances take the place of 
manual reporting in ship reporting systems. For instance, 
when a mariner has to take affirmative action to report, 
manual reporting ensures that the person on the bridge is 
more alert and could be made aware of issues when 
entering the reporting area. Additionally, since the 
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea 
(SOLAS) chapter V, regulation 11, required that a system 
be capable of interaction, and a ship reporting system 
might provide the mariner with valuable information when 
entering a reporting area. In considering the way forward 
on this issue, the S/C agreed that any review of 
mandatory ship reporting systems should be done in the 
context of SOLAS chapter V, regulation 11. The Sub- 
Committee also agreed that it was premature for the S/C 
to undertake a full-scale review of all mandatory 
reporting systems as AIS and LRIT were still under 
development. 
 
Development of guidelines for Integrated Bridge Systems 
(IBS), including performance standards for bridge alert 
management 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
3. The Sub-Committee reviewed the outline of the draft 
IBS guidelines and agreed that due to the broader 
application of the guidelines it was appropriate to use 
the new title "guidelines for bridge equipment and 
systems, their arrangement and integration." The S/C 
further agreed to proceed with the development of two 
separate documents:  Guidelines for Bridge Equipment and 
Systems, their Arrangement and Integration; and 
Performance Standards for Bridge Alert Management. The 
S/C finalized the draft Safety Navigation (SN)/Circular 
on guidelines for the application of the modular concept 
to performance standards.  The S/C reestablished the 
 
 
intersessional Correspondence Group on IBS under the 
leadership of Germany, inviting it to finalize the 
guidelines and performance standards noted above and to 
continue liaison with the S/C on Ship Design and 
Equipment (DE) to ensure consistent treatment of alerts, 
including alarms and indicators. 
 
Amendments to the General Provisions on Ships' Routing 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
4. The Sub-Committee prepared amendments to the General 
Provisions on Ships' Routing (resolution A.572(14) as 
amended) to align them with the specifications for 
routing measures' boundary symbology and charting of 
archipelagic sea lanes adopted by the International 
Hydrographic Organization (IHO). The S/C was invited to 
adopt the amendments, subject to confirmation by the 
Assembly. 
 
Carriage requirements for a bridge navigational 
watch alarm system (BNWAS) 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
5. After extended discussion, the Sub-Committee agreed to 
a carriage requirement for BNWAS provided it was not used 
as a device to support reduced manning or to offset 
fatigue and there would be a grandfather clause for ships 
already fitted with a similar device. The S/C agreed to a 
draft amendment to SOLAS regulation V/19 to reflect a new 
carriage requirement for a BNWAS with a view to adoption 
at MSC's eighty-sixth session. 
 
Review of COLREGs regarding the right-of-way 
of vessels over pleasure craft 
-------------------------------------------- 
6. The Sub-Committee considered Italy's proposals for the 
revision of the International Regulations for Preventing 
Collisions at Sea (COLREGs) regarding the right-of-way of 
vessels over pleasure craft to reduce the risk of 
collision especially in areas with high density of 
pleasure craft and where it is difficult for large 
vessels to operate safely.  Most delegations shared 
Italy's concern regarding the risk of collision. However, 
a large majority was not in favor of amending the COLREGs 
at this stage and instead favored a local approach based 
on national regulations, educational awareness campaigns 
and other practical measures aimed at recreational craft. 
As there was little support for the proposed amendments, 
the MSC was invited to delete the item from the S/C's 
work program, as the work on this item had been 
completed. 
 
Code of conduct during demonstrations/campaigns 
against ships on high seas 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
7. The USDEL, while strongly supporting the concerns 
regarding maritime safety and the safety of seafarers, 
did not support the development of a Code, but instead 
advocated the development of a MSC resolution or circular 
on this issue. In the S/C discussion, there was little 
support for the development of a Code and overwhelming 
support for the development of a resolution or circular. 
A drafting group was sent out with the USDEL as chair, 
using a draft resolution prepared by Australia as the 
base text.  While there was robust discussion on many 
issues, there was only one issue upon which consensus 
could not be reached.  This issue was whether the 
resolution should refer to, and provide an explanatory 
sentence on, international human rights instruments. The 
USDEL opposed the inclusion of this language because such 
instruments are not within the competency of IMO. This 
language was left out of the resolution; however, it was 
noted in the draft report. A draft resolution was 
developed, preliminarily approved by the S/C, and 
forwarded to the Sub-Committee on Flag State 
Implementation (FSI). After consideration by the FSI, it 
will come back to NAV 55 for finalization before going to 
the MSC for adoption. 
 
Development of an e-navigation strategy 
--------------------------------------- 
8. The Sub-Committee considered the report of the 
correspondence group on e-navigation (a collection of 
electronic systems used to improve navigation between 
ships and shore facilities) and a Working Paper prepared 
by the S/C chairman. The S/C prepared a draft strategy 
 
 
for the development and implementation of e-navigation 
for approval by the MSC. The S/C developed a draft 
framework for the implementation of the e-navigation 
strategy along with a timeframe for implementation, for 
approval by the MSC. The S/C further agreed that, subject 
to the MSC's approval of the e-navigation strategy, it 
would be necessary to have a corresponding item on the 
S/C's work program to implement it. Accordingly, the Sub- 
Committee invited the MSC to amend the title of this work 
program item to "Implementation of an e-navigation 
strategy," with four sessions to complete the work. 
 
Development of carriage requirements for ECDIS 
--------------------------------------------- 
9. After extended debate, a strong majority overcame the 
objections of the few who continued to argue that chart 
data and equipment were not universally available, among 
other discounted assertions. The Sub-Committee considered 
in detail the United Kingdom proposal and agreed on a 
draft text incorporating the various amendments with 
respect to ship size/type and the relevant time frames, 
with respect to the proposed mandatory carriage 
requirement for Electronic Chart Display and Information 
Systems (ECDIS) equipment. The S/C also agreed on an 
exemption for ships that would be taken out of service 
within two years.  The S/C agreed that the proposed new 
regulation should be incorporated into regulation V/19 as 
paragraphs 2.10 and 2.11. The S/C also agreed with the 
Australian proposal to finalize a draft SN/Circular on 
Guidance on transitioning from paper chart to ECDIS 
navigation, which would be of benefit whenever ships are 
first equipped with ECDIS, and the draft circular was 
forwarded to MSC for adoption. 
 
Improved safety of pilot transfer arrangements 
--------------------------------------------- - 
10. The Sub-Committee considered a document by 
International Maritime Pilots' Association (IMPA) on 
improved safety of pilot transfer arrangements; the 
results of a 2007 Safety Campaign; and a document by 
Brazil, United States and IMPA on a work program item 
proposal on improving the safety of pilot transfer 
arrangements. The S/C established a correspondence group 
to consider these documents and prepare draft text for 
proposed revisions to SOLAS regulation V/23 and 
resolution A.889(21). The United States (Mr. Bill Cairns) 
will chair the correspondence group. In addition to 
preparing a report for NAV 55, the correspondence group 
will prepare an interim report for DE 52 in order to 
advance the matter. 
 
Other business 
-------------- 
11. The Sub-Committee noted with interest the information 
provided by the United States on the development of an 
International Product Specification for marine 
environmental protection data to be used in conjunction 
with Electronic Navigational Charts (ENCs) and ongoing 
work on this issue. Use of these data would promote 
maritime safety and increase protection of the marine 
environment.  The observer from IHO stated that, as 
reported by the United States, the IHO had established a 
working group to develop a marine environment protection 
product specification to be used in conjunction with 
ENCs, which would enhance voyage planning and mariners' 
ability to navigate safely, thus avoiding damaging the 
marine environment. The United Kingdom urged that, while 
developing such a standard, it should be ensured that any 
system introduced did not interfere with the core 
functionality of the electronic charting system for safe 
navigation by cluttering the chart display. 
LEBARON