Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON174, NO POLLING DIVIDEND FOR LABOUR FROM 2008 BUDGET

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON174.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08WELLINGTON174 2008-06-05 01:41 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXRO1562
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0174/01 1570141
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 050141Z JUN 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5247
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1676
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5182
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0680
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000174 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP 
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NEW ZEALAND
SUBJECT: NO POLLING DIVIDEND FOR LABOUR FROM 2008 BUDGET 
 
REF: WELLINGTON 168 
 
WELLINGTON 00000174  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
1. (SBU)  Summary.  Recent polling showed that the Labour 
Government's 2008 budget failed to provide any boost to its flagging 
popularity.  In fact, Labour lost ground in all three post-budget 
polls as the opposition National Party gained support.  PM Helen 
Clark also lost ground to National Party leader John Key in 
preferred Prime Minister polling.  Although some of the Government's 
support parties, the Greens and New Zealand First, received a 
post-budget bounce, Labour's anticipated tax cut program was not 
enough to appeal to voters.  With the economy foremost in voters' 
minds in 2008 and National delaying presentation of its own economic 
package, the election outcome is by no means decided, but 
increasingly Labour's prospects and options are narrowing.  End 
Summary. 
 
Labour Gets No Bounce for Budget 2008 
------------------------------------- 
 
2. (SBU)  The results of three separate polls, the first after the 
Government's free-spending, tax-cutting May 20 budget, were a 
disappointment for the governing Labour Party (Reftel).  Contrary to 
previous elections, the polls all show that Labour failed to receive 
any bounce from its election year budget goodies.  In fact, Labour 
actually lost ground to the opposition National Party.  In 
minimizing the bad news, Prime Minister Clark predicted that voters 
will not make up their minds until just before the election, when 
they realize that National will not be able to afford its economic 
policies. 
 
Labour More Popular Before the Budget 
------------------------------------- 
 
3. (SBU)  In the May 30 Herald Digi-Poll, where two-thirds of 
respondents were polled before the budget and almost one-third 
afterwards, the overall party vote showed that Labour dropped one 
point to trail National 51.5 percent to 36.2 percent.  In this poll, 
Labour was actually more popular pre-budget than it was post-budget, 
dropping 1.2 percent in that period.  PM Clark even dropped 3.6 
points in the wake of the budget and continued to trail National 
Party leader John Key in the Preferred Prime Minister stakes. 
 
4. (SBU)  The June 1 Colmar Brunton poll, the country's most 
prominent political survey, also found that the plethora of new 
spending programs and long-waited tax relief in the Budget did 
nothing to arrest Labour's downward trend, as it crashed six points 
to a very low 29 percent.  National, on the other hand, ticked up 
one point to 55 percent.  This 26-point gap is the biggest between 
the parties in the last seven years.  Clark also suffered in 
personal polling dropping one point to 28 percent where Key gained a 
point to grow his lead over her to 8 points. 
 
5. (SBU)  The 3 News - TNS poll, also released on June 1, echoed the 
previous two surveys in recording a drop in support for Labour. 
This poll showed Labour registered a drop of three points to 38 
percent, while National gained two points to 50 percent.  Asked 
their choice of PM, 35 percent of respondents choose Key (up six 
points) with 29 percent preferring Clark (down three points). 
 
Support Parties are Budget Beneficiaries 
---------------------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU)  Although Labour did not get any post-budget bounce, two of 
its support parties did better.  The polls showed that Foreign 
Minister Winston Peters' party, New Zealand First, was rewarded with 
an increase in post-budget voter support after it took credit for 
extra spending for the national superannuation scheme and law 
enforcement.  The Green Party was also the recipient of some 
post-budget support after it claimed success for new environmental 
spending. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
7. (SBU)  Labour's poor polling in the post-budget period, where 
past governments have traditionally recorded a bounce, is one more 
worrying sign for the struggling Labour Party.  This is especially 
troubling as polls consistently show that the economy is the 
electorate's most important issue in this election year.  The 
National Party has not yet divulged details of its economic policy 
and the size of its much anticipated tax cut program (Senior 
National MPs have told us, they will only be released closer to the 
election scheduled for October/November).  National's challenge will 
be to convince the public that they can manage the economy better 
than Labour by providing more tax cuts while not cutting back on 
 
WELLINGTON 00000174  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
popular government social programs or borrowing.  At the moment, 
however, National is not feeling too pressed for details and 
continues to benefit from the Labour Party's inability to do 
anything to captivate the public's imagination.  One pundit recently 
quipped that Helen Clark could announce a cure for cancer and it 
still would not push Labour up in the polls.  With five months left 
before the election deadline, the outcome is by no means decided, 
but increasingly Labour's prospects and options are narrowing.  End 
Comment. 
 
McCormick