Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO1573, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/09/08
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO1573.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08TOKYO1573 | 2008-06-09 22:58 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO4994
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1573/01 1612258
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 092258Z JUN 08 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4889
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 0614
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 8239
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 1930
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 6519
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 8829
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3786
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9785
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0211
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 001573
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/09/08
INDEX:
(1) LDP's Machimura faction internally strained by leadership
struggle between Machimura and Nakagawa (Yomiuri)
(2) China may be testing ballistic missiles in the Yellow Sea
(Sankei)
(3) Energy ministerial among Japan, U.S., China, India and South
Korea exposes difficulty in policy coordination; Differences in
views evident over subsidies (Nikkei)
(4) Energy ministers feel sense of impasse over unusually high
current price of oil (Yomiuri)
(5) Closed-loop of Japan-China gas field issue: Odds are against
Japan's claim (Sentaku)
(6) Fukuda's Kantei and Sichuan earthquake (Part A): Inside story on
aid to China after quake; Foreign Ministry: "If U.S. is to extend 50
million yen in aid, Japan needs to provide 10 times that amount";
Chinese vice-foreign minister: "Time is not ripe for SDF dispatch"
(Yomiuri)
(7) Japan should not join cluster banning treaty (Sankei) 8
ARTICLES:
(1) LDP's Machimura faction internally strained by leadership
struggle between Machimura and Nakagawa
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full)
June 8, 2008
Discord has surfaced in the Machimura faction, the largest in the
ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).with a membership of 86. A
leadership struggle between Chief Cabinet Secretary Nobutaka
Machimura, 63, chief caretaker of the faction, and former LDP
Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa, 64, another faction heavyweight,
has opened up. Gaps are now clear in their views on the selection of
a successor to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda. The discord in the
faction from which Fukuda hailed could rock the political base of
his administration.
Nakagawa, in a party he hosted on June 5, was proud of a best
selling book he wrote that is titled Collapse of a
Bureaucracy-Controlled Nation. He bragged: "In just 10 days after
its release, more than 40,000 copes were sold."
In the book, Nakagawa refers to bureaucrats and special-interest
cliques in the Diet as a "stealth complex", and he severely
criticizes those calling for a tax hike and the bureaucracy. The
book has created a major stir in the faction.
Based on this book, the faction's policy committee on June 4 set up
a study group to consider measures to bring about fiscal
reconstruction. A total of 32 faction members, including Nakagawa,
Kosuke Ito, former national land agency chief, and former Justice
Minister Seiken Sugiura, joined it. The members included some
lawmakers who do not have close ties with Nakagawa, but the words
"Nakagawa Study Group" were printed on the materials distributed to
the participants. Some are therefore calling it a subgroup of the
TOKYO 00001573 002 OF 010
faction. Some faction members refrained from taking part in it, with
one lawmaker saying: "I can only surmise that there is a separate
intention for using a book as a text written by a certain
politician."
Nakagawa has not served in any key party post after serving as
secretary general last July, when the LDP suffered a crushing defeat
in the Upper House election. In place of Machimura who is now
serving as chief cabinet secretary, Nakagawa has been in charge of
policies in the faction. He does not hide his enthusiasm for being
able to stand on the political front stage, saying: "The next three
years will become a compilation of my political career." He has
reportedly made critical comments about the way Machimura is
handling his job, such as: "He is unable to communicate with the
prime minister." Many faction members think that Nakagawa wants to
change the faction's name from the Machimura faction to the Nakagawa
faction.
Machimura, meanwhile, appears to be taking a wait-and-see approach,
with an aide saying, "(Machimura) does not regard Nakagawa's move as
creating a group within the faction." Some faction members see
Machimura as calm and composed since he has served in such key posts
as foreign and education ministers. They see him as the faction's
hope. But one junior lawmaker said: "I am sometimes invited
separately by the two to small meetings." This remark indicates that
a leadership struggle is indeed going on behind closed doors.
Some in the faction are concerned about the fact that Machimura and
Nakagawa, who are responsible for supporting the Fukuda government,
have made provocative remarks. Machimura's call for a review of the
government's rice acreage reduction policy incited resentment in the
LDP. On the other hand, Nakagawa referred to possible political
realignment centered on reform of the government office district of
Kasumigaseki. Their remarks have made some inside and outside the
faction concerned.
Former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, supreme advisor to the faction,
appears to be increasingly frustrated with the internal discord. In
a meeting on June 5 of the faction, Mori said: "I want you to
refrain from hamstringing the prime minister." Although Mori
reportedly told his aides that what he had said in the meeting was
"a general view," he, after a Lower House plenary session on June 6,
intentionally had stand chatting for a long time with former
Secretary General Taro Aso, who has distanced himself from Nakagawa.
A senior faction member, who saw the two chatting, reportedly said:
"I felt that Mori was showing off toward Nakagawa."
While some faction members support Machimura as a candidate for the
next prime minister once Fukuda steps down, there is speculation
that Nakagawa may field former Defense Minister Yuriko Koike as a
presidential candidate instead of running himself. Former Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe, advisor to the faction, has strong ties with
Aso.
Of the faction's 60 Lower House members, 27 are those serving in
their first- and second-term in the Diet. Of the 27 Upper House
members, 15 are now serving in their first-term. The observation is
that junior lawmakers have a weak sense of loyalty to factions and
many of them are quietly watching the leadership struggle between
Nakagawa and Machimura.
(2) China may be testing ballistic missiles in the Yellow Sea
TOKYO 00001573 003 OF 010
SANKEI (Top play) (Full)
June 4, 2008
It was learned yesterday from intelligence analysis by the Defense
Ministry and the U.S. Forces Japan that there is a high probability
China's Navy in late May carried out the testing of ballistic
missiles (SLBM), scheduled to be mounted on state-of-the-art
submarines, in the Yellow Sea in a direction facing west toward the
Korean Peninsula. The SLBMs that were launched appear to have been
JL2 types now being developed. An investigation and analysis has
begun on the details by the Defense Ministry's Intelligence
Headquarters and other offices.
According to the Defense Ministry, the missile launch was carried
out on May 29. They were launched from a Golf-class ballistic
missile submarine constructed for use in developing the JL2
missiles. The JL2 missile has a range of 8,000 kilometers, placing a
portion of the U.S. mainland under its range. Reportedly, the
missile will be mounted on the Chinese Navy's state-of-the art Type
094 Jin-class atomic-powered ballistic missile- submarine.
The first Jin-class submarine was launched in 2004. It reportedly
has undergone every kind of navigational test, the aim being to
combat deploy it to a port on Hainan Island, a strategic point in
southern China. The submarine reportedly is capable of mounting 12
code JL2 missiles.
The Defense Ministry, from analysis of every sort of intelligence,
sees the SLBM that was test launched this time from underwater as
having flown low over the water for a short range. In addition, the
U.S. forces did not adopt a stance of heightening its warning
posture, such as bringing in its "observation island," a
missile-tracking vessel that is deployed in case there were signs of
a ballistic missile launch by North Korea.
For that reason, intelligence analysis in the Defense Ministry is
proceeding from the standpoints of: 1) it was a dummy missile
mounted with a simulated warhead; 2) the experiment launched from
underwater only the missile body without a warhead; or 3) the launch
was a failure.
The Defense Ministry strengthened its warning surveillance after
having received U.S. intelligence that there was a possibility
around May 20 that the Chinese military would carry out a
ballistic-missile firing test. In addition, on May 30, North Korea
launched into the same Yellow Sea three short-ranged ship-to-ship
missiles. Intelligence is being collected to see if the two
incidents were connected.
(3) Energy ministerial among Japan, U.S., China, India and South
Korea exposes difficulty in policy coordination; Differences in
views evident over subsidies
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Excerpts)
June 8, 2008
A meeting of the energy ministers of the Group of Eight, held amid
soaring oil prices, has again exposed difficulty in policy
collaboration.
The G-8 ministerial followed a meeting of responsible ministers of
TOKYO 00001573 004 OF 010
Japan, the United States, China, India and South Korea. The meeting
agreed on countermeasures against skyrocketing oil prices, but it
exposed differences in views between industrialized and
less-developed countries over specifics.
Following the meeting, a joint press conference, including a
question-and-answer session, was held. A disturbing mood enveloped
when questions were asked on the governments' price subsidy systems
for crude oil and natural gas. METI Minister Amari still said: "It
was significant that an agreement was reached on the gradual
abolition of subsidies with courage." Indian Ambassador to Japan
Singh rebutted Amari, "We have not reached an agreement." This
forced Amari to rephrase his statement, "An agreement was reached on
the need to abolish subsidies."
According to the International Energy Agency, China's subsidies
total 25 billion dollars a year and that of India 20 billion
dollars. Industrialized countries hope that if subsidies are
reduced, domestic prices would rise to meet the reality of markets
and would lead to curbing consumption and promotion of energy
conservation.
In response, Ambassador Singh said: "It is not possible for
developing countries to completely reflect soaring oil prices in the
prices of goods." China's State Development Planning Commission
Vice-Chairman Zhang Guobao also rebutted, "Although you called it
China's and India's problem, the United States, too, subsidizes
renewable energy." Abolishing subsidies in developing counties at
one stroke might result in strong discontent among farmers and
others as a result of inflation.
(4) Energy ministers feel sense of impasse over unusually high
current price of oil
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full)
June 8, 2008
Although the meeting of the energy ministers of five countries that
was held on the 7th could have served as perfect timing to stem the
flow of 'hot money' of speculators into the oil market, it turned
out instead to underscore the difficulty of achieving unity among
oil consumers.
At the meeting attended by Japan and the United States, China, South
Korea, and India - five countries that command a 50 PERCENT share
of world energy consumption (calculated in crude oil) - a joint
statement was issue that expressed strong alarm: "The recent rise in
oil prices have been the fastest and biggest in history." The other
ministers nodded their heads when Minister of Economy and Trade
Amari said: "The recent soaring oil prices are unusual. They are
neither in the best interests of the oil consumers nor that of the
oil producers." The debate hardly ever focused on measures to
counter global warming, which was supposed to have been the main
subject, but it instead focused on the high price of oil.
But since the situations for developed countries and developing
countries are different, the summary of meeting went no further than
to say that all shared the same sense of alarm. Even on the cause of
the high oil prices, U.S. Energy Secretary Bodman gave as the reason
an insufficient supply of crude oil in the market, saying, "Compared
with the steep rise in demand, production has been flat." In
response, China and India, where demand is rapidly growing,
TOKYO 00001573 005 OF 010
expressed the view that the money game was driving up prices, with
Zhang Guobao, chief of China's State Energy Bureau, stating, "(Oil
markets, with the flowing in of speculative money) are becoming
financial playgrounds."
The United States, whose economy is centered on its financial
market, is negative about any means that would restrict excessive
movements of money in the market. On the other hand, China and
India, which are regarded as the major culprits driving up the
prices on the oil market through their rising domestic demand, are
concerned they will be forced by the international community to
constrain crude-oil consumption and find their economic growth
blocked.
Even among the consuming countries, adjusting the interests of
developed countries and developing countries is proving to be
difficult, and even at the G-8 plus China, India, and the Republic
of Korea meeting that is being held on the 8th, it will not be easy
to come up with cooperative measures that will quiet the markets.
(5) Closed-loop of Japan-China gas field issue: Odds are against
Japan's claim
Sentaku (Page 66-67) (Excerpts)
June, 2008
Chinese President Hu Jintao visited Japan starting on May 6. His
visit brought attention to the issue of settling the development of
gas fields in the East China Sea, a thorny issue that has become
politicized between the two countries since 2004. However, no
progress has been made, despite a beaming Prime Minister Yasuo
Fukuda stressing that there had been major achievements.
Touching on the East China Sea gas field issue, Fukuda, during the
two-hour press briefing on May 7 after the summit, played up the
talks: "Significant progress has been made. We have reached an
outlook for settling this long-standing issue." Hu also echoed
Fukuda, "We now see prospects for settling the issue."
Various dailies gave top play coverage to a report that following an
agreement in principle on the joint development of gas fields, Japan
and China would work out the details at the working level. However,
the released joint statement simply notes that the two countries
would make the East China Sea a "sea of peace, cooperation and
friendship." Little progress has been made since Junichiro Koizumi's
tenure as prime minister, when a statement that the two countries
would make the East China Sea "a sea of friendship" instead of a
contested area was adopted.
Key is demarcation of development area
The real crux of the gas field issue is the designation of areas
that would subject to joint development. If the government fails to
specify which gas fields would be jointly developed and when the
projects would be launched, it is the same as a failure to produce
results. Demarcating areas subject to joint development is not an
issue that can be settled at the working-level. It is a highly
politicized issue to be tackled at the heads of state level. As
such, it is nothing more than the usual pesky diplomatic issue that
the Foreign Ministry always tries to put off.
All countries are entitled to claim their right to natural resources
TOKYO 00001573 006 OF 010
in areas extending up to the outer edge of the continental shelf.
However, the adoption of the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea has
made it complicated to settle disputes among states. The Treaty
includes two definitions for an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) --
either up to the outer edge of the continental shelf or up to 200
nautical miles (approximately 379 kilometers) from the coast line,
or if the distance between the coast lines of the two countries is
less than 400 nautical miles, up to the median line between the two
countries.
Japan has consistently made the following self-serving requests at
the bilateral working-level talks: (1) jointly developing four gas
fields, starting with the Chunxiao gas field (Shirakaba in
Japanese), where development by the Chinese side is underway; (2)
provision of geologic information on areas around the East China
Sea, which China has already obtained; and (3) halting the
development of the Chunxiao gas field until the two countries arrive
at an agreement on joint development. The Chinese government has
brushed aside those requests.
The tension between the two countries eased when Shinzo Abe took
office as prime minister in September 2006. Japan and China agreed
to settle the issue of jointly developing four gas fields by the
time Abe visited China in the fall of 2007.
However, no conclusion has been reached even when Prime Minister
Fukuda visited China in December 2007. It was then decided to settle
the issue when Hu visited Japan during the cherry blossom season in
ΒΆ2008. However, the talks that were held then in 2008 made no
headway.
International trend is continental shelf
As such, the Prime Minister's Official Residence (Kantei) and the
Foreign Ministry have resorted to using a secret card: Foreign
Minister Masahiko Koumura and Vice Foreign Minister Mitoji Yabunaka
quietly working on Chinese Foreign Minister Yang to put the EEZ
demarcation issue on the back burner and to persuade China instead
to agree to press ahead with talks aimed at realizing joint
development.
The Chinese government also had a vulnerable aspect in that Hu
wanted to show his eagerness to improve relations with Japan in
order to secure its support for the Beijing Olympic Games, which
were being affected by the Tibet issue.
One confident Foreign Ministry official optimistically commented
that since Hu had agreed to a joint development of the Chunxiao gas
field and to distribute profits in proportion to the amount of money
the two countries had invested, all that needed to be done now was
for China to deal with domestic public opinion.
However, reaching an actual accord on joint development is nothing
but wishful thinking by the Japanese government, for it goes against
the domestic situation in China and international conventional
wisdom regarding joint resources development.
Given the situation in China, in the event the Chinese government is
quick to make a compromise on the joint development of gas fields on
the Chinese side of the median line, the military, which takes a
hard-line stance of being prepared to take a military action if
Japan starts exploring an oil field near the median line, is bound
TOKYO 00001573 007 OF 010
to object. The Hu administration is not united. It has yet to
completely put the military under its control. China has disputes
with Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines over the development of oil
resources in and around the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.
If it makes concessions on the development of oil fields in the East
China Sea in such a way as to damage its national interests, it
could have an adverse effect on its other disputes with neighboring
countries over natural resources.
Prime Minister Fukuda said that prospects had been obtained for the
joint development of the Chunxiaon gas field. However, China's New
China News Agency carried no report about that. If China swallows
Japan's proposal, an anti-Japanese movement centered on the Internet
would spring up among young people, influence by their patriotic
education, even if the government imposed news censorship. Should
that occur, it would seriously shake the very foundation of the
administration.
The commonsense trend in the world in settling disputes over natural
resources involving two countries is contrary to the Japanese
government's scenario. In the dispute between Australia and Timor
over the development of oil resources, Australia claimed its
exploration right up to the outer edge of the continental shelf,
while Timor claimed its right up to the median line. In other words,
China takes the position similar to that of Australia, while Japan
takes the stand similar to that of Timor.
In the end, a settlement was reached on adopting the stand of
Australia, that is to say, the area subject to joint development is
the area from the median line up to the outer edge of the
continental shelf. It means that China's claim has become the main
trend in the world. Japan and China jointly exploring an area from
the median line up to the Okinawa trough on the Japanese side of the
median line is a settlement in line with the global trend.
Hard-liners against China, such as former Economy, Trade and
Industry Minister Shoichi Nakagawa and Yoshiko Sakurai, are bound to
object strongly, if the Fukuda administration agrees on such an
idea. In other words, there is no feasible compromise resolution at
all with the public opinion in Japan and in China differing on the
issue.
Working-level talks are under suspension due to the Sichuan quake.
Settling the issue by the G-8 in July, as senior government
officials optimistically hoped for, is sheer nonsense.
(6) Fukuda's Kantei and Sichuan earthquake (Part A): Inside story on
aid to China after quake; Foreign Ministry: "If U.S. is to extend 50
million yen in aid, Japan needs to provide 10 times that amount";
Chinese vice-foreign minister: "Time is not ripe for SDF dispatch"
MAINICHI (Pages 1 and 3) (Abridged slightly)
June 8, 2008
It has been nearly one month since the devastating earthquake struck
Sichuan, China. In the wake of the deadly quake, the strength of the
"mutually beneficial relationship," confirmed by Prime Minister
Yasuo Fukuda and President Hu Jintao during the Chinese president's
visit to Japan days before the temblor, is now being tested.
Although the government sent the Japan Disaster Relief Team to China
ahead of other countries, it has become clear that public opinion
and administrative work are lagging behind the improved top-level
Japan-China relations.
TOKYO 00001573 008 OF 010
The quake occurred at 3:28 p.m. May 12, Japan time.
On the evening of May 12, Fukuda ordered the Foreign Ministry to
send letters of sympathy to President Hu and Premier Wen Jiabao. In
the wake of a major disaster in a foreign country, it is customary
for Japan to send a telegram to that country in the name of the
prime minister. In addition to this custom, Fukuda revealed his
intention to send personal letters expressing his thoughts.
Before the day was over, the Foreign Ministry via its embassy in
Beijing presented China with an aid plan including: (1) financial
aid, (2) relief supplies, (3) an emergency relief team, (4) a
medical team, and (5) SDF troops. The ministry immediately began
determining the size of the financial aid.
Upon obtaining information from a U.S. source that Washington would
extend aid worth approximately 50 million yen, the Foreign Ministry
determined the size of the aid on May 12 on the grounds that if the
United States is to extend 50 million yen, Japan should contribute
10 times that amount. Foreign Minister Masahiko Koumura announced on
May 13 that Japan would extend 500 million yen in aid to China as
its neighbor.
After some twists and turns, Japan has implemented the first four
aid measures. The SDF dispatch plan followed a wild path.
On May 27, China sounded out Japan on mobilizing SDF aircraft as a
means of delivering relief supplies. Although it was an informal
request from the Chinese military, the government, carried away by
the excitement of the request for the SDF, took it as an official
request from Beijing.
The information found its way to the Japanese media on May 28, and
Machimura told a press conference: "There has been requests for aid,
including one request involving the SDF. They are under
consideration by the government." The matter made front-page
headlines on May 29, and Chinese Internet forums were swamped by
anti-SDF posts. The government generally decided to forgo the SDF
plan on the night of May 29.
A meeting was held between Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Wu Dawei
and Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau Director-General Akitaka Saiki
in Beijing on May 29 in which the former said, "The time is
premature," while pointing out public opinion expressed via the
Internet. Wu's statement was conveyed to Prime Minister Fukuda that
day, and the prime minister decided to call off the plan, according
to a senior Foreign Ministry official.
An agreement was also reached in the Saiki-Wu meeting on the need to
avoid the Japanese public stiffening their attitude toward China by
attributing the government's decision to a rejection of the SDF by
China. Both Tokyo and Beijing, which had been elated by the
Fukuda-Hu talks, misread Chinese public opinion.
(7) Japan should not join cluster banning treaty
SANKEI (Page 13) (Full)
June 6, 2008
Satoshi Morimoto, professor at Takushoku University's graduate
school
TOKYO 00001573 009 OF 010
I wonder why there are so many would-be pacifists in Japan. They
should now stop holding on to the negative legacy of Japan's defeat
in the war. They think to themselves that peace is attainable if
they only keep saying something about it. It is an illusion that
cannot pass muster with international realpolitik. Such an attitude
is a betrayal of Japan and its people. It will become clear when
Japan encounters a crisis. If they do not understand it or pretend
not to understand it, they are not real pacifists.
One good example is participation in a treaty that bans cluster
munitions. Japan should not join this treaty. If the government
signs the treaty, the Diet should not ratify it.
Japan is an exception that has reduced its defense budget, while
other countries have been spending more on their defense. Basically,
the cluster munitions that the Self-Defense Forces would use to
defend Japan are an effective use of the budget. They are defensive
weapons. Cluster munitions, each of which contains a number of
submunitions or bomblets, are effective weapons to block airborne or
seaborne landing enemy troops. Their deterrent effect is
significant, and it would not be easy to replace them with a large
number of troops and other weapons.
Cluster bomblets do have a defect, for approximately 10 PERCENT of
them do not explode. But when using cluster munitions in Japan,
civilians would be evacuated under the Civil Protection Law. The
SDF, after using cluster munitions, would sufficiently remove
unexploded shells. It is not appropriate to cite the case of
civilian victims in East Europe, the Middle East, and Gulf states,
where such unexploded ordnance (UXO) was not well removed. As a
matter of course, Japan will not use cluster munitions on the
enemy's land.
Needless to say, Japan has a long coastline. Besides, the SDF's
manpower is also limited. Cluster munitions are effective not only
for the defense of Japan's mainland but also for the defense of its
outlying islands. Britain used cluster bombs in the Falklands War of
1982 and conducted operations to its advantage.
Some people argue like this: "Where on earth is the country that
would try to invade Japan?" China, South Korea, North Korea, Russia,
and the United States have cluster munitions. However, they do not
participate in the cluster bomb banning treaty, nor will they come
out to attend even a conference on the treaty. Yet people think that
although there is a threat of aggression against these countries,
there can never be aggression against Japan... Such thinking is a
fantasy that does not make sense in the real world. Those thinking
in this fashion are not qualified to talk about national defense or
security.
Many European countries have joined this treaty. However, if cluster
bombs are not used in East European countries or other countries
that are not in the treaty, for example, the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), they would not be seriously troubled in their
military operations. The Cold War is over. Nowadays, NATO is tasked
with securing Europe by organizing and dispatching multinational
forces to the outside of its members' territorial space, instead of
protecting their territories.
The security of a region like Asia-where a country is being
threatened or endangered-cannot be discussed in the same logic as
TOKYO 00001573 010 OF 010
Europe's. Moreover, this time, foreign governments are only catering
to the fierce campaign of nongovernmental organizations that once
worked for the Convention on the Prohibition of Antipersonnel
Landmines. Germany proposed exempting technologically advanced
munitions from the definition of cluster munitions. However, Germany
produces bombs to be exempted. Germany wants to sell its weapons
after cluster munitions are banned. This is why.
There are objections to the definition of cluster munitions. The
treaty bans only those that have no self-destructive or guiding
functions and that are unreliable and inaccurate. In the Diet, there
is a suprapartisan group of lawmakers who are aware of this fact
about Europe but forget all about the strategic environment of Asia.
In response to the cluster ban treaty that would spoil Japan's
national defense or security resources, they have formed a
parliamentary league seeking to prohibit cluster munitions and
campaigning against cluster munitions. That is quite absurd.
It is only natural that weapons are inhumane. Some people develop
their own logic, maintaining that cluster bombs are inhumane because
such weapons do not take the lives of people all at once. Then, what
about weapons that take the lives of people all at once? Are they
humane? There are also people asserting that cluster bombs are
inhumane because they victimize civilians. This kind of logic is not
convincing, either. Many of them account for noncombatant victims
while citing the case of countries where weapons are under extremely
insufficient control. Why don't they place more confidence in the
SDF?
As a consequence of participating in the treaty, Japan will have to
spend a lot of its taxpayers' money to scrap its weapons.
Furthermore, U.S. Forces Japan will also be substantially affected
in its operations for the defense of Japan. Troubling the U.S.
forces, at least in materiel transportation or training, will be
unavoidable. This could bring about a serious problem for the
Japan-U.S. alliance.
At any rate, Japan possesses weapons from the perspectives of how to
use and manage them as deterrent resources for its national defense
and how to save the lives of its people. To say it is humane to
prohibit such weapons is only the logic of people insisting on
unarmed neutrality.
SCHIEFFER