Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08STATE68633, CORRECTED COPY: REQUEST TO ENGAGE JAPAN ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08STATE68633.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08STATE68633 2008-06-26 13:10 2011-06-17 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Secretary of State
O 261310Z JUN 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO PAGE 02        STATE   068633  261308Z 
USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 068633 
 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/19/2018 
TAGS: PREL SMIL MARR MOPS NATO AF AS CA GM IT FR JA
SUBJECT: CORRECTED COPY: REQUEST TO ENGAGE JAPAN ON 
CONTRIBUTIONS TO AFGHANISTAN SECURITY 
 
REF: A. TOKYO 1464 B. TOKYO 1593 C. SECDEF DTG 031932Z JUN 08 D. TOKYO 1623 E. TOKYO 1657 
 
Classified By: EAP Acting A/S Glyn Davies for Reason 1.4 (b) and (d) 
 
1.  (U)  This is an Action Request, please see paragraph 3. 
 
 
---------- 
Background 
---------- 
 
2.  (C)  The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively 
considering possible contributions to support NATO-led 
International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) security 
operations in Afghanistan (REFS A-E).  A GOJ survey team 
traveled to NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and to Afghanistan and 
neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to collect facts on 
ISAF needs.  COMISAF and ISAF Regional Commanders told the 
survey team that the most critical ISAF requirements that 
Japan could address were airlift (especially CH-47s for 
medium/heavy lift or medevac missions) and leading a 
Provincial Reconstruction Team in the Daykundi or Nimruz 
provinces.  Other possible contributions include fixed-wing 
(C-130) or intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
(ISR) assets.  The GOJ is divided over how to proceed, with 
some factions interested in minimum and limited 
contributions.  As the GOJ considers the findings from the 
survey team, it will be important for the U.S. and other 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging substantive - not token - 
Japanese contributions.  The upcoming G8 Foreign Ministerial 
Meeting and Summit in Japan provide the best opportunities to 
highlight the importance of Japanese participation in 
Afghanistan at the most senior levels and influence Japanese 
decision-making.  The action request below provides points 
for G8 members and other international stakeholders to engage 
their GOJ counterparts on this important issue. 
 
 
-------------- 
Talking Points 
-------------- 
 
 
3.  (C)  ACTION REQUEST:  Posts are requested to convey the 
following points and report reaction back to the Department 
by June 25. 
 
 
FOR OTTAWA, PARIS, BERLIN, ROME, AND LONDON:  Embassies are 
requested to convey the below points to their host-country 
foreign ministries at the highest appropriate level. 
 
--  The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively considering 
possible contributions to support NATO-led International 
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) security operations in 
Afghanistan. 
 
--  A Japanese survey team visited NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and 
Afghanistan and neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to 
collect facts on ISAF needs. 
 
--  Japanese CH-47 rotary-wing assets could help fill a 
critical ISAF shortfall for medium/heavy-lift and medevac 
operations.  Japan could also lead a Provincial 
Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Daykundi or Nimruz provinces, 
where there is currently no ISAF presence. 
 
--  The U.S. has urged the GOJ to consider substantive - not 
token - security contributions, commensurate with its status 
as a G8 nation. 
 
--  Japan doing more in Afghanistan is in the best interest 
of both your government and ours.  However, Japan's political 
environment will make it difficult for the GOJ to commit to a 
substantive contribution.  It will therefore be important for 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging a substantive Japanese 
contribution. 
 
--  The upcoming G8 Summit in Japan provides an opportunity 
for us to highlight the positive impact a substantive 
Japanese contribution would bring to the security environment 
in Afghanistan. 
 
--  At the June 26-27 G8 Foreign Ministers, meeting in 
Kyoto, please consider emphasizing to Japan Foreign Minister 
Koumura the importance of substantive Japanese security 
contributions to ISAF and Afghanistan. 
 
--  Please also consider conveying to the Ambassador of Japan 
the importance of substantive Japanese security contributions 
to ISAF and Afghanistan, and reinforcing the message through 
your Embassy in Tokyo. 
 
 
 
FOR KABUL:  Request Embassy convey points below to Afghan 
Foreign and Defense Ministries at the highest appropriate 
level, and to National Security Adviser Rassoul. 
 
-- The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively considering 
possible contributions to support NATO-led International 
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) security operations in 
Afghanistan. 
 
-- A Japanese survey team visited NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and 
Afghanistan and neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to 
collect facts on ISAF needs. 
 
-- Japanese CH-47 rotary-wing assets could help fill a 
critical ISAF shortfall for medium/heavy-lift and medevac 
operations.  Japan could also lead a Provincial 
Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Daykundi or Nimruz provinces, 
where there is currently no ISAF presence. 
 
-- The U.S. has urged the GOJ to consider substantive - not 
token - security contributions, commensurate with its status 
as a G8 nation. 
 
-- Japan doing more in Afghanistan is in the best interest of 
both your government and ours.  However, Japan's political 
environment will make it difficult for the GOJ to commit to a 
substantive contribution.  It will therefore be important for 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging a substantive Japanese 
contribution. 
 
-- Please consider conveying to the Ambassador of Japan the 
importance of substantive Japanese security contributions to 
ISAF and Afghanistan, and reinforcing these messages with 
partner ambassadors in Kabul. 
 
 
 
FOR CANBERRA:  Request Embassy convey points below to Foreign 
and Defense Ministries at the highest appropriate level: 
 
-- The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively considering 
possible contributions to support NATO-led International 
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) security operations in 
Afghanistan. 
 
-- A Japanese survey team visited NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and 
Afghanistan and neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to 
collect facts on ISAF needs. 
 
-- Japanese CH-47 rotary-wing assets could help fill a 
critical ISAF shortfall for medium/heavy-lift and medevac 
operations.  Japan could also lead a Provincial 
Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Daykundi or Nimruz provinces, 
where there is currently no ISAF presence. 
 
-- The U.S. has urged the GOJ to consider substantive - not 
token - security contributions, commensurate with its status 
as a G8 nation. 
 
-- Japan doing more in Afghanistan is in the best interest of 
both your government and ours.  However, Japan,s political 
environment will make it difficult for the GOJ to commit to a 
substantive contribution.  It will therefore be important for 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging a substantive Japanese 
contribution. 
 
-- Please consider conveying to the Ambassador of Japan the 
importance of substantive Japanese security contributions to 
ISAF and Afghanistan, and reinforcing the message through 
your Embassy in Tokyo. 
 
 
 
FOR USNATO (POINTS REL NATO) :  Request Chief of Mission 
convey points below to NATO Secretary General (SYG): 
 
-- The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively considering 
possible contributions to support ISAF security operations in 
Afghanistan. 
 
-- A Japanese survey team visited NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and 
Afghanistan and neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to 
collect facts on ISAF needs.  In Afghanistan, the team met 
with COMISAF, COM RC-SOUTH, COM RC-NORTH, and officials from 
RC-EAST. 
 
-- Japanese CH-47 rotary-wing assets could help fill a 
critical ISAF shortfall for medium/heavy-lift and medevac 
operations.  Japan could also lead a Provincial 
Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Daykundi or Nimruz provinces, 
where there is currently no ISAF presence. 
 
-- The U.S. has urged the GOJ to consider substantive - not 
token - security contributions, commensurate with its desire 
to strengthen its relationship with NATO. 
 
-- Japan doing more in Afghanistan is in the best interest of 
all coalition partners.  However, Japan,s political 
environment will make it difficult for the GOJ to commit to a 
substantive contribution.  It will therefore be important for 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging a substantive Japanese 
contribution. 
 
 
 
FOR TOKYO:  Request Embassy convey points below to Ambassador 
of Afghanistan to Japan: 
 
-- The Government of Japan (GOJ) is actively considering 
possible contributions to support NATO-led International 
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) security operations in 
Afghanistan. 
 
-- A Japanese survey team visited NATO SHAPE on 30 May, and 
Afghanistan and neighboring countries from 9-16 June, to 
collect facts on ISAF needs. 
 
-- Japanese CH-47 rotary-wing assets could help fill a 
critical ISAF shortfall for medium/heavy-lift and medevac 
operations.  Japan could also lead a Provincial 
Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Daykundi or Nimruz provinces, 
where there is currently no ISAF presence. 
 
-- The U.S. has urged the GOJ to consider substantive - not 
token - security contributions, commensurate with its status 
as a G8 nation. 
 
-- As you know, Japan,s political environment will make it 
difficult for the GOJ to commit to a substantive 
contribution.  It will therefore be important for 
international stakeholders in the Afghanistan mission to 
maintain a common front in urging a substantive Japanese 
contribution. 
 
-- Please consider conveying to the Government of Japan the 
importance of substantive Japanese security contributions to 
ISAF and Afghanistan, and reinforcing the message with 
partner ambassdors in Tokyo. 
 
4.  (U)  This message has been coordinated with DOD. 
Questions concerning this action request can be directed to 
Dr. Jason Hamm, OSD Country Director for Japan, at 
Jason.hamm@osd.smil.mil, (703) 614-2897; and to Mr. David 
Schlaefer, State Political-Military Affairs for Japan, at 
SchlaeferDA@state.sgov.gov, (202) 647-2914. 
 
RICE