Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MANAGUA720, DEMARCHE DELIVERED: NICARAGUA PERSISTS ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MANAGUA720.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MANAGUA720 2008-06-06 17:32 2011-06-23 08:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Managua
VZCZCXYZ0023
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMU #0720/01 1581732
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 061732Z JUN 08
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2718
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L MANAGUA 000720 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/05/2018 
TAGS: PGOV NU
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE DELIVERED: NICARAGUA PERSISTS ON 
COUNTER-MERIDA 
 
REF: STATE 57540 
 
Classified By: Ambassador Paul Trivelli for reasons 1.4 (b and d) 
 
1. (C) Summary:  On June 5, Nicaraguan Foreign Ministry 
officials offered rebuttals to points contained in the USG 
rejection of the Nicaraguan Counter-Merida proposal. 
Regarding the USG position that Nicaragua could not receive a 
credit or loan guarantee as a member of the Heavily Indebted 
Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, the officials pointed out 
that since the Nicaraguan proposal is a regional proposal 
covering all of Central America, other Central American 
countries that are not HIPC members should be able to receive 
the credit or loan guarantee.  The officials also continued 
to press for a "small group" meeting between the U.S., 
Honduras, and Nicaragua to discuss further security 
cooperation.  The officials concluded the meeting by pressing 
for more resources for Central American security and law 
enforcement initiatives, claiming that without such resources 
Nicaragua and other Central American countries would be 
forced to focus their resources on other priorities such as 
food security.  End Summary. 
 
Proposal Is Regional, HIPC Not A Problem 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
2. (C) On June 5, PolChief delivered reftel demarche points 
to the Nicaraguan Foreign Ministry International Legal 
Advisory Division's Director of Democratic Security Carlos 
Vicente Ibarra, Director of North American Affairs Renee 
Morales, and North American Political Specialist Gregorio 
Torrez. When presented with the demarche points, Ibarra asked 
for more time to prepare a formal, official response but 
offered some "informal reactions" to the USG rejection of the 
Nicaraguan security (Counter-Merida) proposal.  Ibarra first 
pointed out that although the USG characterized the 
Counter-Merida proposal as Nicaraguan, in fact the proposal 
is regional and has support from other Central American 
countries such as Honduras. In response to the USG position 
that Nicaragua is unable to receive credit as a member of the 
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, Ibarra 
said that other Central American countries who are not HIPC 
members would theoretically be able to receive the credit or 
loan guarantee. 
 
Small Groups Work Better 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
3. (C) Ibarra then asked whether the demarche represented the 
USG's final response to Nicaragua's previous request to have 
a "small group meeting" between the U.S., Nicaragua, and 
Honduras to discuss the security proposal.  PolChief replied 
that although the demarche clearly addressed the USG response 
to Nicaragua's security proposal, continued security 
cooperation with Honduras and other Central American 
countries can be conducted through SICA meetings.  In 
response, Ibarra argued that a small group would be able to 
find more opportunities for cooperation and stressed the 
importance of holding such a meeting soon, lest the "door be 
closed" on this window of communication. 
 
Central America Needs More 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
4. (C) North American Affairs Director Renee Morales added 
that the Government of Nicaragua (GON) is concerned that 
Nicaragua would only be receiving a small portion of the 
security funding proposed under the Merida Initiative.  She 
asserted that the GON is closely following the progress of 
the Merida Proposal through Congress and noted that Nicaragua 
will only receive less than $10 million USD.  Ibarra 
contrasted this to Nicaragua's security proposal, in which 
the GON calculated that Central America needs $953 million in 
resources to fully implement and fund the initiatives 
contained in the proposal.  "Financing is crucial," he 
continued, "for without sufficient financing Nicaragua and 
other Cental American countries may have to focus on other 
priorities, such as food security."  Morales assured 
PolChief, however, that the GON would ready for the SICA 
coordination meeting in Washington on Monday June 9 and hoped 
that it will be a productive session.  Ibarra pointedly 
remarked that the USG response to the Nicaraguan proposal is 
a "new element" in the situation that must be analyzed and 
factored into GON participation in the meeting. 
 
Comment 
- - - - 
 
 
5. (C) Comment: The GON clearly will not back down from their 
Counter-Merida proposal without a fight.  We can imply from 
the GON's inability to mention any other strong supporters of 
their proposal besides Honduras, though, that the GON has not 
found widespread support for their concept.  We believe, 
however, that the GON's view may be indicative of an overall 
perception by Central American countries that the Central 
American portion of the Merida Initiative is inadequate for 
the region's actual security needs.  In order to prevent the 
GON's Counter-Merida proposal from gaining any more traction 
amongst Nicaragua's neighboring countries, we strongly 
recommend that the Department share the points arguing 
against the GON proposal with other Central American posts. 
TRIVELLI