Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO1398, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/21/08
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO1398.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08TOKYO1398 | 2008-05-21 21:57 | 2011-08-25 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO0238
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1398/01 1422157
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 212157Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4435
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 0305
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7923
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 1604
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 6233
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 8515
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3471
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9472
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9925
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 15 TOKYO 001398
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/21/08
INDEX:
AMERICAN EMBASSY, TOKYO
PUBLIC AFFAIRS SECTION
OFFICE OF TRANSLATION AND MEDIA ANALYSIS
INQUIRIES: 03-3224-5360
INTERNET E-MAIL ADDRESS: otmatokyo@state.gov
DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS
May 21, 2008
INDEX:
(1) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, road-specific tax
revenues (Asahi)
(2) Pressure for more fiscal expenditures casting pall over reform,
as discussion of basic economic policy guidelines kicks off (Asahi)
(3) With plan to double aid to Africa, Fukuda aims to halt ODA
slide, alarmed at Japan's waning international status (Tokyo
Shimbun)
(4) Dark cloud being cast over Machimura faction's good fortune;
Feud between Machimura and Nakagawa intensifying (Sankei)
(5) Japan waives jurisdiction over most GI cases: U.S. archives
(Tokyo Shimbun)
(6) Look to Africa (Part 2): Trading firm executive-turned
ambassador to Botswana (Mainichi)
(7) Stop cluster bombs (Series 1) - Voices of world and Japan (Part
2): Interview with Ambassador MacKay, permanent representative of
New Zealand to the UN Office in Geneva; Need to serve as deterrent
against "bad weapons"; Prevention of unacceptable harm to civilians
is our starting point (Mainichi)
(8) Stop cluster bombs (Series 1) - Voices of world and Japan (Part
3): Conflicting viewpoints between two groups of countries as to a
total ban and a partial ban (Mainichi)
(9) Editorial: Simple possession of child pornography should be
banned (Yomiuri)
(10) Editorial: Japan-U.S-ROK talks must result in progress on
nuclear and abduction issues (Yomiuri)
(11) Editorial: Time to make decision to totally ban cluster bombs
(Tokyo Shimbun)
ARTICLES:
(1) Poll on Fukuda cabinet, political parties, road-specific tax
revenues
ASAHI (Page 4) (Full)
May 20, 2008
Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage, rounded off. Bracketed figures denote
proportions to all respondents. Figures in parentheses denote the
results of the last survey conducted Apr. 30-May 1 unless otherwise
specified.)
TOKYO 00001398 002 OF 015
Q: Do you support the Fukuda cabinet?
Yes 19 (20)
No 65 (59)
Q: Why? (One reason only. Left column for those marking "yes" on
previous question, and right for those saying "no.")
The prime minister is Mr. Fukuda 22(4) 4(3)
It's an LDP-led cabinet 32(6) 21(14)
From the aspect of policies 20(4) 66(43)
No particular reason 23(4) 7(5)
Q: Which political party do you support now?
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 22 (24)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 26 (28)
New Komeito (NK) 3 (4)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2 (2)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 1 (0)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 (0)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0 (0)
Other political parties 0 (0)
None 38 (34)
No answer (N/A) + don't know (D/K) 8 (8)
Q: Do you think the House of Representatives should be dissolved as
early as possible for a general election?
Yes 49
No 41
Q: If you were to vote now in a general election, which political
party would you like to vote for in your proportional representation
bloc?
LDP 23 (22)
DPJ 39 (39)
NK 3 (4)
JCP 3 (2)
SDP 1 (1)
PNP 0 (0)
NPN 0 (0)
Other political parties 1 (1)
N/A+D/K 30 (31)
Q: Following the reinstatement of a gasoline surcharge in late
April, the ruling coalition took a second vote in the House of
Representatives on a bill to use gasoline tax revenues for road
construction and other road-related infrastructure projects and
passed the bill. Do you think it was appropriate to take a second
vote on this legislation?
Yes 27
No 63
Q: Prior to the taking of a second vote this time for road
construction and other road-related infrastructure projects, the
government made a cabinet decision to incorporate gasoline and other
road-specific tax revenues into the state's general account budget
from next fiscal year. Do you appreciate this?
TOKYO 00001398 003 OF 015
Yes 41
No 46
Q: Prime Minister Fukuda says he will make a review from public
horizons of how to use road-specific tax revenues upon incorporating
the road tax revenues into the state's general account budget. Do
you think Prime Minister Fukuda will be able to substantially change
the use of road tax revenues?
Yes 9
No 82
Q: Do you appreciate the DPJ's response to the issue of gasoline and
other road-specific tax revenues?
Yes 31
No 50
Q: In April, the government introduced a new health insurance system
for those aged 75 and over. Do you appreciate this? (Figures in
parentheses denote the results of a survey conducted Apr. 19-20.)
Yes 15 (18)
No 74 (71)
Q: Under this new system, almost all of those aged 75 and
over-including dependents who currently do not have to pay insurance
premiums-will have to pay premiums in October and afterward. Do you
agree to collecting insurance premiums from almost all of those aged
75 and over?
Yes 17
No 75
Q: The government and the ruling coalition will maintain the new
health insurance system for the elderly after reviewing it for such
measures as lowering the premium for those with low income.
Meanwhile, the DPJ and other opposition parties are calling for
abolishing the system itself. Which side do you appreciate?
Government, ruling coalition 30
Opposition parties 53
Q: Prime Minister Fukuda met with Chinese President Hu Jintao on the
occasion of his recent visit to Japan. Do you appreciate the
Japan-China summit this time?
Yes 35
No 47
Q: What's your impression of Prime Minister Fukuda after the
Japan-China summit this time? Is it better, worse, or unchanged?
Better 6
Worse 10
Unchanged 81
Q: All eyes are on foreign leaders about whether they will attend
the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony over the Tibet issue. Do you
think it would be better for Prime Minister Fukuda to attend the
opening ceremony?
TOKYO 00001398 004 OF 015
Yes 56
No 24
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted May 17-18 over the
telephone on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis.
Respondents were chosen from among the nation's voting population on
a three-stage random-sampling basis. Valid answers were obtained
from 2,217 persons (60 PERCENT ).
(2) Pressure for more fiscal expenditures casting pall over reform,
as discussion of basic economic policy guidelines kicks off
ASAHI (Page 6) (Full)
May 21, 2008
The government's Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (CEFP)
yesterday started reviewing the state's expenditures and revenues in
the run-up to mapping out in late June a set pf basic policy
guidelines on economic and fiscal management and structural reforms
for the fiscal 2008 national budget. However, the ruling parties are
increasingly calling for boosting expenditures in such areas as
social security. A plan to reform revenues and expenditures as a
set, which has been in place since the Koizumi administration, has
now reached a critical juncture.
Prime Minister Fukuda during the CEFP meeting yesterday called for
firmly maintaining the government goal of moving the primary balance
of the central and local governments into the black by fiscal 2011,
noting: "It is harsh to cut expenditures. However, we should not
stop our reform effort now for the sake of future generations, as
well. The government will cut wasteful spending without protected
sanctuaries."
Moving the primary balance into the black means achieving the
government's fiscal soundness where expenditures, excluding debt
payments, are balanced by tax revenues, that is to say, progress on
the recapitalization of the nation's financial base to some degree.
The government has been propelling spending cuts, incorporating in
the basic guidelines for fiscal 2006 this goal for achieving the
primary balance and goals for attaining a budget cut in each sector.
However, since the ruling parties suffered a crushing defeat in the
Upper House election last summer, calls for a spending increase have
been gaining ground, the lawmakers citing that they cannot fight in
the next general election if the situation remains as is.
Pressure for more spending is particularly strong in three areas:
social security, including medical services, education, and official
development assistance (ODA). Related agencies and policy
specialists in those areas are actively trying to secure increased
budgets, as can be seen in that Health, Labor and Welfare Minister
Yoichi Masuzoe pointed out the need to take a second look at the
goal of constraining social security expenditures.
Prime Minister Fukuda has come up with a policy of shifting
special-purpose road construction revenues for more general usage so
that squeezed funds can be used for medical services, measures to
protect the environment, and education. This has fueled a
budget-grabbing battle. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and
Transport (MLIT) and road policy experts in the Liberal Democratic
Party (LDP) are trying to fend off such moves in an effort to hold
TOKYO 00001398 005 OF 015
on to the road budget.
One private-sector member during the CEFP meeting yesterday drove
the point home, "Some media reports say that the government policy
of allocating road revenues for general usage might slow spending
reform, but we must not allow the reform drive to slow down."
However, there is the possibility of the present goal of cutting
expenditures being revised, if the distribution of budgetary funds
is changed significantly as a result of the reallocation of road
revenues for general usage. Some Finance Ministry officials take the
view that principles would be chipped away, if budget allocation is
increased in certain areas. There is a widespread sense of caution
that should that occur, expenditures would continue to rise.
Consideration given to ruling parties in tax code discussion
The time-limit for hiking the consumption tax is drawing near,
because the government plans to raise the ratio of the basic pension
(national pension) funded from tax revenues from the current
one-third to 50 PERCENT . This would cost funding resources worth
approximately 2.3 trillion yen or a rise in the consumption tax by 1
PERCENT . The LDP Tax System Research Commission and the
government's Tax Research Commission will speed up debate on a
consumption tax hike.
Private-sector members of the CEFP, including Fujio Miarai, chairman
of the Japan Business Federation (Nippon Keidanren), at the CEFP
meeting yesterday proposed a taxpayer identification number system
intended to prevent tax evasion, by grasping the income of tax
payers, and a tax deduction system attached with a benefit package
aimed at reducing low- income earners' tax burden. One aim of those
proposals is to pave the way for raising the consumption tax rate,
by giving consideration to income disparities and a sense of
fairness.
Finance Minister Nukaga at the meeting called for a drastic tax code
revision before year's end. Yutaka Kozai, chairman of the
government's Tax Research Commission noted, "The Tax Research
Commission will pursue discussion more scrupulously than before."
Private-sector members echoed, "It is necessary to drastically
reform the tax code, including the consumption tax."
However, the CEFP has no plan to hold the next meeting on the tax
code in preparation for drafting of basic guidelines for fiscal 2008
due to the political consideration that it should not move ahead
before discussion by the ruling moves into high gear. Basic
guidelines for fiscal 2008 will adopt words similar to those
included in the fiscal 2007 version of basic guidelines, which
stipulated that efforts will be made in order to realize a drastic
reform of the tax code, including the consumption tax.
Many elements in the government are of the view that the rest should
be left to the prime minister and the ruling camp to make a
political decision. However, whether the prime minister will decide
to raise the consumption tax at a time when his cabinet support
ratings are low remains unclear. Barriers to raising the consumption
tax are high, because the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) also
intends to place a moratorium on a consumption tax hike until the
next general election.
(3) With plan to double aid to Africa, Fukuda aims to halt ODA
slide, alarmed at Japan's waning international status
TOKYO 00001398 006 OF 015
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
May 21, 2008
Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda said in a meeting of the Overseas
Economic Cooperation Conference yesterday that Japan would double
its official development assistance (ODA) disbursements to Africa
over the next five years ending in 2012. With an eye on applying the
brakes to ODA budget cutbacks, Fukuda is aiming to increase
diplomatic activities in order to attain his policy goal of turning
Japan into a peace-cooperation state.
The prime minister's decision to double ODA disbursements to Africa
reflects his strong alarm at the recent decline of Japan's stance as
an aid donor in the international community.
Over the decade from 1997, Japan's ODA budget in the general account
(cash outlays) decreased about 40 PERCENT . In real terms, Japan,
which once was the world's biggest aid donor, slipped to fifth place
(based on provisional figures) among the 22 member countries of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) last
year.
Fukuda therefore decided to significantly increase spending on ODA
projects ahead of the 4th Tokyo International Conference on African
Development (TICAD) to start on May 28, saying: "We must not
disappoint the leaders of more than 40 participating countries."
In 2005, then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi announced a plan to
double ODA outlays to Africa over the next three years. Hidden in
the plan, though, was the "trick" of achieving the goal by
accumulating forgiven debts, since the government was facing severe
fiscal straits.
The new plan is designed not to write off debts but to increase new
ODA allocations from about 100 billion yen to 200 billion yen. Money
for non-reimbursable (grant) aid is disbursed from the general
account budget. Given this, a Foreign Ministry source deemed the
doubling plan as one step toward expanding ODA funds.
In a meeting of the House of Councillors' Special Committee on May
16, in which the ODA doubling plan was adopted, Prime Minister
Fukuda said in reference to a plan to shift highway-related tax
revenues to the general budget: "I expect the increased portion in
the general account will be incorporated in the ODA budget." He thus
expressed his desire to see an increase in ODA funds.
But the policy guidelines for 2006 specified an annual 2-4 PERCENT
cut in ODA disbursements over the five years starting in FY2007.
Many take the view that the guidelines must be reviewed before the
ODA budget is boosted. The government intends to determine policy
guidelines for this year at a cabinet meeting in late June. In
negotiations on the guidelines, the focus of discussion is expected
to be on how to coordinate this ODA-reduction policy and the new
doubling plan.
Now that the government is being pressed to finance expenditures in
the social security area, such as a review of the health insurance
system for people aged 75 or older, it will not be easy for it to
raise funds.
(4) Dark cloud being cast over Machimura faction's good fortune;
TOKYO 00001398 007 OF 015
Feud between Machimura and Nakagawa intensifying
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full)
May 20, 2008
The ruling Liberal Democratic Party's Machimura faction (formally,
the Seiwa Policy Study Group, with a membership of 86), which has
produced four LDP presidents including Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda,
last evening held a fund-raising party at the Tokyo Ground Prince
Hotel in Akasaka. The largest reception hall in Tokyo was filled
with approximately 5,000 people, a demonstration of the faction's
strength. But what was lacking there was any emotional uplift. This
is because the momentum of the Fukuda administration has rapidly
declined. Moreover, a factional feud between Chief Cabinet Secretary
Nobutaka Machimura and former LDP Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa
has grown stronger. Dark clouds seem to be casting a shadow over the
good fortune of the LDP's largest faction.
The party was extremely well attended, and three especially set-up
rooms on a different floor were also full to capacity.
LDP Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki was surprised, saying, "A faction
that has produced four prime ministers in succession was able to
gather so many!" Election Strategy Council Chairman Makoto Koga
complimented the faction: "The Seiwa Policy Study Group has produced
monumental work, unprecedented in the LDP's history." Former
Secretary General Taro Aso, who is waiting for the prime minister's
post once Fukuda leaves office, showed his loyalty when he said: "I
vow to join your efforts to overcome the biggest crisis since the
party was founded." Last September when the Fukuda cabinet was
inaugurated, the faction adopted a caretaker system under which it
is led by three senior members -- Machimura, Hidenao Nakagawa, and
Shuzen Tanigawa, chairman of the party plenary of both chambers of
the DIet. However, Nakagawa has the real power. Former Prime
Minister Yoshiro Mori has become the faction's supreme advisor. As a
result, the Machimura faction is controlled actually by Mori and
Nakagawa.
Nakagawa said:
"In TV dramas, politicians are described as villains. For the first
time, a politician is being depicted as a hero in Fuji TV's drama
'Change.' The starting point of politics is honesty. We, the Seiwa
group, should continue to produce heroes and heroines."
He underscored the strength of numbers that the largest faction in
the LDP held. He sought to constrain moves by those faction members
waiting to succeed Fukuda as prime minister.
The Machimura faction descended from the Seiwakai faction founded by
the late Prime Minister Takeo Fukuda. It struggled alone for many
years as the anti-mainstream force of the LDP, but after Mori became
prime minister in 2000, the tide turned. The faction then produced
in succession the Koizumi, Abe and Fukuda administrations. Mori has
been a kind of kingmaker for the faction, much like the late Shin
Kanemaru, who once served as LDP vice president.
But cracks can now be seen in the Machimura faction's once iron-clad
unity.
Because Nakagawa, a dyed-in-the-wool politician, and Machimura, a
bureaucrat-turned politician, do not get along, their jockeying for
TOKYO 00001398 008 OF 015
power has intensified. Mori has warned them: "You should not think
only about the next presidential race. We should consider how we
should back our colleague (Fukuda) from our faction." But the
confrontation between Nakagawa and Machimura has continued to
escalate.
Another development is a move to possibly field former Defense
Minister Yuriko Koike as a candidate in the next party presidential
race. Shinzo Abe, who rejoined the faction in March, has deep ties
with Aso. A mid-level faction member said: "The Machimura faction
could fall apart during the next presidential race."
Ibuki in his toast, praised Prime Minister Fukuda for doing his best
under a difficult situation, adding that he wanted the faction
members to line up and support him. His comments can be taken as a
bit of nastiness toward the Machimura faction.
Mori in his toast said: "I pray for Japan's prosperity and peace in
the international community." But what indeed was he thinking deep
down inside?
(5) Japan waives jurisdiction over most GI cases: U.S. archives
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full)
May 18, 2008
In 1953, the Japanese and U.S. governments made a secret deal over
incidents involving U.S. military personnel in Japan. At the time,
Japan agreed to give up its jurisdiction over their cases with the
exception of major crimes. As a result, Japan waived its primary
jurisdiction over 97 PERCENT of those incidents that took place
during the following period of about five years. This fact became
known from declassified U.S. government documents.
In those days, Japan held court trials over criminal cases involving
U.S. soldiers. According to one of the declassified U.S. official
documents, however, the U.S. government took Japan's criminal
punishments as lighter than anticipated. The U.S. government later
asked the Japanese government to make public the arcane deal.
However, the then prime minister, Nobusuke Kishi, did not agree to
do so for fear of a potential backlash in Japan. Kishi was quoted as
saying, "If we spill the beans, it would be disgraceful."
Concerning crimes committed by off-duty U.S. soldiers, Japan is said
to have had primary jurisdiction over their cases under the
Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). The Japanese
government takes the position that it has not waived its
jurisdiction. In Okinawa and other prefectures, however, prosecutors
dropped a number of cases. There were also many cases that were not
tried in Japan. In fact, Japan used to waive its jurisdiction.
The official documents, created between 1958 and 1966, were
discovered at the U.S. National Archives.
These declassified documents include a confidential telegram, which,
dated Oct. 2, 1958, was sent from Secretary of State Dulles to the
U.S. Embassy in Japan. In this arcane document, Dulles wrote that
the United States "should obtain Japan's waiver of its jurisdiction
if and when the United States agrees to revise the Japan-U.S.
Security Treaty." With this, Dulles suggested the need to make
public the secret deal.
TOKYO 00001398 009 OF 015
Two days later, Ambassador MacArthur met with Prime Minister Kishi.
In the meeting, MacArthur asked Kishi: "Japan has customarily waived
its jurisdiction without revealing the secret record of discussions
in 1953, and I'd like to ask you to clarify that Japan will do so in
the future," Kishi, however, disagreed.
According to a document created by the U.S. State Department in June
1957, Japan had primary jurisdiction over about 13,000 cases after
1953 and waived its jurisdiction over 97 PERCENT of those cases.
Actually, Japan held court trials over only 400 cases or so.
Another document created that month had a description of cases tried
at Japanese courts, saying Japan's criminal punishments are lighter
than those tried in U.S. courts martial.
The secret deal was taken over even after the security pact was
revised. In the 1960s, South Korea and Taiwan called for conditions
on the same plane as those for Japan. In its negotiations with South
Korea and Taiwan, the United States attempted to refer to the facts
about Japan's waiver of jurisdiction. According to the document,
however, Japan rejected it.
(6) Look to Africa (Part 2): Trading firm executive-turned
ambassador to Botswana
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full)
May 21, 2008
"I want you to carry out resource diplomacy," Prime Minister Yasuo
Fukuda on May 13 told Ryoichi Matsuyama, who had just been appointed
as Japan's first ambassador to Botswana. The Japanese government
established its embassy in an African country in January this year.
Fukuda was briefed on the resource situation in Botswana for about
20 minutes by Matsuyama, a former managing director of Mitsui
Bussan.
The Republic of Botswana has a population of 20 million. Just 36
Japanese reside in that country. Annual trade between Japan and
Botswana totals only 4 billion yen. The Japanese government's
purpose of sending the former trading house executive there is to
secure such rare metals as nickel and chrome.
Rare metals are the new strategic materials, indispensable in the
manufacturing of high-tech products such as cellular phones.
However, the producing areas are limited to China, Russia and
Africa.
China has already inhibited its exports of rare materials. Japan has
been forced to seek new suppliers. Britain and France, former
colonial powers, have secured interests in Africa. The exports of
Botswana to Britain account for 75 PERCENT .
Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Akira Amari, who became the
first Japanese cabinet minister to visit Botswana last November,
urged Botswana President Festus Mogae to review its relations with
former suzerain powers, noting: "Are they partners to whom you sell
ores or partners who nurture your industries?" Japan's technology to
predict underground reserves based on data collected from satellite
images was the key to an agreement between Japan and Botswana on
joint research on rare materials. Amari and Mogae also agreed that
Japan would provide Botswana with know-how.
TOKYO 00001398 010 OF 015
Japan, which has been experiencing financial difficulties, cannot
win competition to increase aid amounts. Japan must break doors of
the former colonial powers by its technology and experience of
providing aid over the years.
(7) Stop cluster bombs (Series 1) - Voices of world and Japan (Part
2): Interview with Ambassador MacKay, permanent representative of
New Zealand to the UN Office in Geneva; Need to serve as deterrent
against "bad weapons"; Prevention of unacceptable harm to civilians
is our starting point
MAINICHI (Page 8) (Full)
May 20, 2008
The Mainichi Shimbun interviewed Ambassador Don MacKay, who served
as chairperson of the Wellington Conference on Cluster Bombs of the
Oslo Process, about the points of contention in drafting a draft
treaty banning cluster munitions.
Interviewer: Katsumi Sawada
We have still several sticking points, but I believe it is possible
for us to reach a final agreement on a draft treaty banning cluster
munitions.
We had intensive discussion in informal talks under the Wellington
Conference (held this past February as part of the Oslo Process). I
refrained from mentioning states by name, but many countries
reconsidered their positions in the Wellington Conference
(concerning the definition related to a total ban or a partial ban
that will allow some exceptions). With the final stage of talks
approaching, each state has begun trying to meet halfway.
When we discuss the definition, I think we need to return to the
spirit of the Oslo Declaration (issued in February 2007, which
decided to start the Oslo Process), namely, "Prohibit weapons that
cause unacceptable harm to civilians."
The Oslo Declaration does not mention a total ban. What we are going
to create is not a disarmament treaty but a humanitarian treaty. If
weapons are developed that will not have a harmful effect on
civilians, we are positive about them. It is a good thing that
during the year and a half since (the process started), many states
have begun looking for ways to make (cluster bombs) more reliable
and accurate (with less numbers of unexploded elements).
Another point of contention is whether there would be any trouble
when a joint military campaign with non-member states (of the Oslo
Process, for instance, the United States and Russia is carried out
after a treaty banning cluster munitions is concluded). A
considerable number of major states call for modifying the draft
treaty. In this regard, we need to well deal with that.
If this treaty is concluded, cluster bombs will be labeled as "bad
weapons." Non-member states (such as the U.S. and Russia) would be
forced to be prudent about using them, so civilian casualties caused
by unexploded munitions would be reduced. The draft treaty also
mentions the need to improve assistance to victims. This is also a
very important element.
Each state's position as to definition of cluster munitions
TOKYO 00001398 011 OF 015
Exceptions to ban Major states
Group of states favoring a total ban on cluster bombs No exception
Norway, Ireland, New Zealand
Group A of states favoring a partial ban Allows exception about
latest bombs (equipped with target designation system) Germany,
U.K., France
Canada and Australia
Sweden
Group B of states favoring a partial ban Allows exception about
improved bombs (equipped with self-destruct mechanism) and latest
bombs Japan
Finland
(8) Stop cluster bombs (Series 1) - Voices of world and Japan (Part
3): Conflicting viewpoints between two groups of countries as to a
total ban and a partial ban
MAINICHI (Page 8) (Full)
May 21, 2008
Katsumi Sawada, Dublin
The Oslo Process is aiming to produce a convention banning cluster
munitions by the end of this year, but there has been the strong
conflict of views between the two groups of countries participating
in the process over the question of whether to totally or partially
ban cluster bombs. A major point of contention in the Dublin
Conference on Cluster Munitions is how to define exceptions and
weapons that will not be subject to prohibition. Meanwhile, the
United States, which is not a member of the Oslo Process, has given
a warning to the Dublin Conference.
A major subject for discussion in the Dublin Conference is what to
do about a draft treaty, which Norway and some other countries
jointly submitted to the Wellington Conference on Cluster Bombs held
this past February. The draft treaty defines cluster munitions as
the "weapons that release explosive submunitions" and then it leaves
room to put down exceptions to the ban. A major point in issue in
the Dublin Conference is to discuss what will be put down for this
exception provision and how to define weapons subject to the ban.
Norway and some other countries calling for a total ban call for
reducing the number of exceptions to as few as possible. Meanwhile,
Japan, Britain, Germany, France and some other countries are
opposed, calling instead for a partial ban so that some weapons
could be made exceptions. These countries have come up with a
proposal to modify the draft treaty. The host country of the Dublin
Conference, Ireland, notes: "The points of contention have now been
considerably narrowed down."
Group of countries calling for partial ban divided
What has made the situation complex is the fact that the group of
countries calling for a partial ban has now divided into two
sub-groups.
Proposals aimed at modifying the draft treaty that have been
presented by the group of countries calling for a partial ban are
broadly divided into two categories. One is Japan's proposal to
except improved weapons equipped with a self-destruct device that
will function when bombs fail to detonate. Another proposal has been
submitted by Germany. This proposal would except the latest weapons
TOKYO 00001398 012 OF 015
equipped with a target designation system, with a similar system
also installed in their submunitions.
The U.S. possesses a large number of the improved weapon, and in
actual combat, their dud rate exceeds 10 PERCENT . With such bombs,
the unexploded components could cause harm to civilians. But in the
case of the latest model, the dud rate is low and the number of
submunitions is also limited.
Britain, Germany, France, and Canada are insisting that the improved
models also should be prohibited, while Japan and Finland are trying
to keep the improved models. These two groups are wide apart in
their views. International attention is now on how far the group of
countries calling for a partial ban can unify views internally.
However, the U.S. has cast a pall over the Dublin Conference. A
senior U.S. official suggested to the Japanese media, including the
Mainichi Shimbun, there was "a new policy," implying there has been
improvement to lower the rate of failure to detonate. The official
sought to check the Dublin Conference. Behind this move is
Washington's intention to adopt the pose that it is taking
improvement measures on its own and use this to slow the momentum to
conclude a convention.
The draft treaty prohibits the non-member states (of the Oslo
Process) from using cluster bombs against member states. Japan has
questioned this provision and has insisted on reconsidering it,
noting that trouble could arise in joint operations with countries
that are not signatories to the Oslo Process, such as the U.S.
(9) Editorial: Simple possession of child pornography should be
banned
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full)
May 6, 2008
In order to protect children from criminal harm, there should be no
hesitation to strengthen the legal system. A ruling parties' project
team is working on amending the Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography Law. This law was enacted in 1999 as Diet
member-sponsored legislation. It bans such activities as providing
nude or semi-nude images of children under 18 "that excite or
stimulate prurient desires."
The ruling camp's project team has set a policy direction of newly
banning and punishing the "simple possession" of child pornography
collected by individuals. Although the banning of simple possession
of child pornography was debated at the time of the law's enactment,
the issue was shelved because of the arguments that "consideration
be given to the privacy of the possessor," and "concerns about the
abuse of investigative authority."
However, with the rapid expansion of child pornography on the
Internet, advanced industrialized countries have begun to toughen
restrictions. The only countries in the Group of Eight (G-8) that
have not banned simple possession are Japan and Russia.
U.S. Ambassador to Japan Schieffer has expressed to Justice Minister
Hatoyama his expectation that simple possession would be banned in
Japan. The fact that simple possession is allowed in Japan has
become an obstacle to closer international cooperation in
investigating child pornography. Once images flow into the Net, it
TOKYO 00001398 013 OF 015
is difficult to retrieve them. The children who are filmed being
sexually assaulted will continue to bear deep moral scars all their
lives.
In Nara Prefecture, where the tragic incident of a child having been
kidnapped and slain by a person with such a mania, the simple
possession of pornography of children under 13 years of age was
banned three years ago.
An opinion poll carried out last year by the Cabinet Agency found 90
PERCENT of the public approving the restriction of simple
possession of child pornography. The opportunity is already ripe.
The ruling camp's project team plans to introduce a system of
blocking under which the provider would cut off connections to
child-porno sites. Some of the debate has been over whether
restrictions should be applied to cartoons, anime, and computer
graphics (CG) that depict child pornography scenes. In the United
States and France, such material, too, is subject to restrictions.
On the other hand, in Britain, CG animations alone are banned, with
anime and comics being outside the scope of the law. There thus are
slight differences depending on the country in handling this issue.
There is also the problem of freedom of expression associated with
placing restrictions, so careful debate seems necessary. But first
of all, banning the simple possession and introducing a blocking
system should be the focus of attention and considered when amending
the law.
(10) Editorial: Japan-U.S-ROK talks must result in progress on
nuclear and abduction issues
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full)
May 21, 2008
Director-level talks between Japan, the United States, and South
Korea have taken place after a long interval. We would like to see
the North Korean nuclear issue, now at a crucial stage, move forward
through close cooperation between the three countries.
Through their talks in Washington, the three countries' chief
delegates to the six-party talks confirmed the policy course to
enhance trilateral cooperation to ensure that North Korea presents a
complete and correct declaration of its nuclear programs.
The three countries lacked unity toward the end of the term of the
former Roh Moo Hyun administration of South Korea. Trilateral talks
were not held regularly. The United States separately briefed Japan
and South Korea on its talks with North Korea in early April in
Beijing.
With the launch of the Lee Myung Bak administration, which places
high priority on the Japan-U.S.-South Korea framework, and a
changeover of the South Korean chief negotiator, the stage has
finally been set for trilateral talks.
Differences in views on the nuclear issue among the three countries
have always been mentioned as a factor since the late 1990s.
Although their ultimate goal is to make North Korea abandon its
nuclear ambitions, the three countries' approaches and priority
policies vary. Such cannot be helped because they are separate
TOKYO 00001398 014 OF 015
countries.
It is important to make efforts to find effective means to force the
North into abandoning its nuclear programs, while endeavoring to
bridge the gaps. The significance of the trilateral talks lies
there.
The amount of extracted plutonium is the biggest point of contention
in declaring nuclear programs. The United States' estimate of 50
kilograms clashes with the North's assertion of 30 kilograms.
In early May, North Korea submitted to the United States voluminous
records of operations of its nuclear facilities. Can they underpin
the North's claim? They must be verified by experts.
There are only eight months left until the Bush administration
leaves office. Some in the administration want to swiftly finish the
nuclear declaration process to move on to the next level with the
aim of accomplishing an historical achievement. But others think
that an ambiguous settlement would leave serious problems for the
future.
Geopolitically, Japan is more exposed to the North Korean nuclear
threat than the United States and South Korea. There is every reason
to demand a complete and current declaration from a security
viewpoint.
The North has demanded it be taken off the U.S. list of nations
sponsoring terrorism in return for its nuclear declaration.
Delisting is important diplomatic leverage for Japan, the United
States, and South Korea. It must be used in a manner that is most
effective.
In the latest bilateral talks, Japan underscored the as long as
there is no progress on the abduction issue, the North's request for
delisting should be dealt with cautiously. The United States and
South Korea reportedly expressed their understanding.
Even if the North promises a reinvestigation into the whereabouts of
the abduction victims, that alone would not be enough to be called
"progress." It is essential to attain substantial "progress" leading
to repatriation of victims and uncovering of the facts.
(11) Editorial: Time to make decision to totally ban cluster bombs
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 5) (Full)
May 20, 2008
The "Oslo Process" Dublin conference on cluster bombs that can
indiscriminately kill and wound civilians has started. We hope for
an agreement to ban cluster bombs altogether. This is the time for
the Japanese government to decide to totally abolish its stock of
cluster bombs.
The Dublin conference runs through May 30 in Ireland's capital. The
focus is on whether to decide to totally or partially ban cluster
bombs.
Conferences of signatories to the Convention on Certain Conventional
Weapons (CCW) have been discussing restrictions on the use of
cluster bombs since 2001. The talks have stalled because the United
States, China, and Russia that possess large numbers of cluster
TOKYO 00001398 015 OF 015
bombs planned not to be forced into a total ban. A conclusion has
yet to be reached.
Dissatisfied, Norway and other countries have been pushing ahead
with the Oslo Process since February 2007 with the aim of concluding
a treaty in 2008. The Oslo Process does not include the United
States, China, and Russia. Many European countries are in favor of a
total ban, whereas Britain, Germany, and France are advocating a
partial ban.
Cluster bombs are air-dropped munitions that are designed to scatter
smaller bomblets over wide areas to cause damage to ground troops
and others.
Cluster bombs have been used in conflicts in such countries as Iraq,
Afghanistan, the former Yugoslavia (Serbia), and Lebanon. The
conflicts are over, but there have been many reports of civilians
who were killed or injured by unexploded bomblets.
Branislav Kapetanovic, a former Serbian soldier, lost both hands and
feet when a bomblet exploded when he was going to destroy it (in
2000). He has been calling for the abolition of brutal weapons,
saying: "One cluster bomb can destroy two, three soccer grounds.
Over 95 PERCENT of victims would be civilians. (Cluster bombs) are
monster weapons."
Let us recall the Convention on the Prohibition of Antipersonnel
Mines. It prohibits using, stockpiling, producing and transferring
antipersonnel mines. Because of this convention, the United States
finds it effectively impossible to use antipersonnel mines. It is
also possible to totally prohibit cluster bombs. We would like to
see the participating countries put their wisdom together at the
Dublin conference.
Japan's basic position is that cluster bombs are necessary for
security reasons, aligning itself with Britain, Germany, and France.
Japan's consideration for the United States, which does not want to
see a treaty banning cluster bombs, is obvious.
The people and government of Japan have long called for the complete
abolition of nuclear weapons; they are still making efforts to that
end. They should also strive for the complete abolition of cluster
bombs.
Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda should demonstrate a resolute stance to
the international community.
SCHIEFFER