Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ADANA
ASEC
AFIN
AMGT
AE
AORC
AID
AR
AO
AU
ASEAN
AGOA
AFGHANISTAN
AFFAIRS
AMED
APER
ASECARP
APEC
AEMR
AS
AA
ANET
AFLU
ABLD
AL
ASUP
AJ
APECO
AMER
ABUD
AODE
AM
AFSN
AESC
AND
AG
ALOW
AROC
AVIANFLU
ATRN
ACOA
AEGR
AMGMT
AADP
AFSI
ACABQ
APRM
AZ
AIDS
ASE
AGAO
ADCO
ABDALLAH
ARF
AIDAC
ACOTA
ASCH
AC
ASEG
AGR
ACS
AMCHAMS
AN
AMIA
ASIG
ADPM
ADB
ANARCHISTS
ALOWAR
ARM
AUC
AINF
AINT
AORG
AY
AVIAN
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
ARABL
AOWC
AGRICULTURE
ALJAZEERA
AMTC
AFINM
AOCR
ABER
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
ASSK
AZE
AORCYM
AINR
AGMT
AEC
ACKM
APRC
AIN
ASCC
AFPREL
ASED
APERTH
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
AOMS
AORCO
ANTXON
ARC
AFAF
ADIP
AIAG
AFARI
AEMED
AORL
AX
ASECAF
AOPC
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AMB
AGUIRRE
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AIT
ARCH
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEX
AFR
ASCE
ATRA
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
ASPA
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AECL
ACAO
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORD
AFL
AME
ADM
ASECPHUM
AGIT
ABT
ASECVE
AGUILAR
AT
ABMC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ASR
ANTONIO
BMGT
BEXP
BM
BG
BL
BA
BR
BTA
BO
BY
BBSR
BLUE
BK
BF
BTIO
BELLVIEW
BE
BU
BN
BH
BD
BC
BTC
BILAT
BT
BX
BRUSSELS
BP
BB
BRPA
BUSH
BURMA
BMENA
BESP
BIT
BBG
BGD
BMEAID
BAGHDAD
BEN
BIO
BMOT
BWC
BLUNT
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BFIF
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BIDEN
BZ
BFIN
BTRA
BI
BHUM
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BORDER
BEXPC
BTIU
BTT
BIOS
BEXB
BGPGOV
BOND
BLR
CE
CG
CH
CVR
CASC
CU
CI
CD
CO
CDG
CB
CJAN
CPAS
COM
CVIS
CMGT
CT
CENTCOM
CNARC
CTERR
COUNTER
CHIEF
CDC
CTR
CBW
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CY
CA
CM
CS
CWC
CN
CITES
CF
CWG
CIVS
CFIS
CASCC
CROATIA
CONS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CASA
COE
CJ
CHR
CODEL
CR
CBC
CACS
CHERTOFF
CAS
CONTROL
CONDITIONS
CONDOLEEZZA
CITEL
CV
CLINTON
CHG
CZ
CON
CTBT
CEN
CRIMES
COMMERCE
CLOK
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CND
CTM
CARICOM
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CBTH
CHINA
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CW
CAMBODIA
CENSUS
CIDA
CRIME
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CAIO
CEC
CARSON
CPCTC
CEDAW
COMESA
CVIA
CWCM
CEA
COSI
CAPC
CGEN
COPUOS
CGOPRC
COETRD
CKGR
CFE
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CACM
CIAT
CDB
CIS
CUL
CHAO
CNC
CL
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAN
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CIA
CBSA
CEUDA
CAC
CROS
CIO
CPUOS
CKOR
CVPR
CONG
CONTROLS
CEPTER
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CDCE
DPOL
DEMARCHE
DHS
DR
DA
DISENGAGEMENT
DEMOCRATIC
DEFENSE
DJ
DY
DARFUR
DHRF
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DO
DARFR
DOC
DRL
DK
DOJ
DTRA
DOMESTIC
DAC
DOD
DEAX
DIEZ
DEOC
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCOM
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DE
DB
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DHLAKAMA
DHSX
DS
DKEM
DAO
DCM
DANIEL
DEM
DAVID
DCRM
ETRD
EAGR
ETTC
EAID
ECON
EFIN
ECIN
EINV
ELAB
EAIR
ENRG
EPET
EWWT
ECPS
EIND
EMIN
ELTN
EC
ETMIN
EUC
EZ
ET
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EU
EUN
EG
EINT
ER
ECONOMICS
ES
EMS
ENIV
EEB
EN
ECE
ECOSOC
EK
ENVIRONMENT
EFIS
EI
EWT
ENGRD
ECPSN
EXIM
EIAD
ERIN
ECPC
EDEV
ENGY
ECTRD
EPA
ESTH
ECCT
EINVECON
ENGR
ERTD
EUR
EAP
EWWC
ELTD
EL
EXIMOPIC
EXTERNAL
ETRDEC
ESCAP
ECO
EGAD
ELNT
ECONOMIC
ENV
ETRN
EIAR
EUMEM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EREL
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
ETCC
ETRG
ECONOMY
EMED
ETR
ENERG
EITC
EFINOECD
EURM
EENG
ERA
EXPORT
ENRD
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EGEN
EBRD
EVIN
ETRAD
ECOWAS
EFTA
ECONETRDBESPAR
EGOVSY
EPIN
EID
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
ETT
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ETRC
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EFI
ENRGY
ESCI
EE
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
ECIP
EIAID
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EING
EGOV
ETRA
EPETEIND
ELAN
ETRDGK
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
ENVI
ELN
EAG
EPCS
EPRT
EPTED
ETRB
EUM
EAIDS
EFIC
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
ESF
EIDN
ELAM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
ECN
EDA
EXBS
EINTECPS
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
EPREL
EAC
EINVEFIN
ETA
EAGER
EINDIR
ECA
ECLAC
ELAP
EITI
EUCOM
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
EARG
ELDIN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ECCP
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEFIN
EIB
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
ETIO
ELAINE
EMN
EATO
EWTR
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ENRGIZ
EISL
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
EUREM
ENTG
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
EFND
EPECO
EAIRECONRP
ERGR
ETRDPGOV
ECPN
ENRGMO
EPWR
EET
EAIS
EAGRE
EDUARDO
EAGRRP
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EICN
ECONQH
EVN
EGHG
ELBR
EINF
EAIDHO
EENV
ETEX
ERNG
ED
FR
FREEDOM
FINREF
FJ
FI
FRELIMO
FOREIGN
FAA
FETHI
FAS
FTAA
FRB
FAO
FCS
FINANCE
FWS
FTA
FEMA
FDA
FLU
FRANCISCO
FBI
FORCE
FO
FARC
FK
FT
FCSC
FAC
FM
FMGT
FINV
FCSCEG
FARM
FERNANDO
FINR
FIN
FINE
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FCUL
FKLU
FMLN
FISO
FIXED
GM
GMUS
GG
GR
GE
GAZA
GT
GH
GZ
GJ
GLOBAL
GV
GABY
GOI
GA
GCC
GB
GY
GATT
GC
GUAM
GEORGE
GTIP
GOV
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
GERARD
GI
HK
HR
HUMANR
HUMAN
HO
HA
HUMANRIGHTS
HU
HHS
HIV
HUM
HRKAWC
HILLEN
HILLARY
HDP
HUMRIT
HSTC
HUMANITARIAN
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HURI
HL
HRETRD
HOURANI
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HARRY
HRECON
HRC
HOSTAGES
HEBRON
HUMOR
HSWG
HYMPSK
HECTOR
HN
HYDE
HUD
HRPGOV
HIGHLIGHTS
ID
ILC
IS
IZ
ICAO
IMO
ITU
IR
IAEA
ICRC
IPROP
IT
IBRD
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ISSUES
ITRA
IV
IO
IGAD
IRAQ
IN
IMF
ICTR
ISCON
IADB
IDB
IEA
INR
IWC
ICCAT
ILO
INMARSAT
IOM
ICJ
IQ
ISPA
ITRD
IPR
INTELSAT
ISN
IAHRC
INTERNAL
IFAD
IICA
IHO
IRAN
IL
IRCE
IC
INTELLECTUAL
IRM
IE
ICTY
IDLI
IFO
ISCA
INF
INL
ISRAEL
INV
IBB
INFLUENZA
ISPL
ITER
ITIA
INRA
ISAF
IACHR
INTERPOL
IFR
IRS
INRB
IEF
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
INAUGURATION
IND
INS
IZPREL
IACI
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IA
IMTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IACW
IK
IUCN
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
ISO
ICES
IRMO
ITPGOV
IQNV
IMSO
IRDB
IMET
INCB
IFRC
JA
JO
JP
JM
JCIC
JOHN
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JUS
JN
JOHNNIE
JAMES
JKUS
JOSEPH
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
JIMENEZ
JOSE
JKJUS
JK
JAPAN
KMDR
KPAO
KPKO
KJUS
KCRM
KGHG
KFRD
KWMN
KDEM
KTFN
KHIV
KGIC
KIDE
KSCA
KNNP
KHUM
KIPR
KSUM
KISL
KIRF
KCOR
KRCM
KPAL
KWBG
KN
KS
KOMC
KSEP
KFLU
KPWR
KTIA
KSEO
KMPI
KHLS
KICC
KSTH
KMCA
KVPR
KPRM
KE
KU
KZ
KFLO
KSAF
KTIP
KTEX
KBCT
KOCI
KOLY
KOR
KAWC
KACT
KUNR
KTDB
KSTC
KLIG
KSKN
KNN
KCFE
KCIP
KGHA
KHDP
KPOW
KUNC
KDRL
KV
KPREL
KCRS
KPOL
KRVC
KRIM
KGIT
KWIR
KT
KIRC
KOMO
KRFD
KUWAIT
KG
KFIN
KSCI
KTFIN
KFTN
KGOV
KPRV
KSAC
KGIV
KCRIM
KPIR
KSOC
KBIO
KW
KGLB
KMWN
KPO
KFSC
KSEAO
KSTCPL
KSI
KPRP
KREC
KFPC
KUNH
KCSA
KMRS
KNDP
KR
KICCPUR
KPPAO
KCSY
KTBT
KCIS
KNEP
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KGCC
KINR
KPOP
KMFO
KENV
KNAR
KVIR
KDRG
KDMR
KFCE
KNAO
KDEN
KGCN
KICA
KIMMITT
KMCC
KLFU
KMSG
KSEC
KUM
KCUL
KMNP
KSMT
KCOM
KOMCSG
KSPR
KPMI
KRAD
KIND
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KTER
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KTSC
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KJUST
KMIG
KLAB
KTFR
KSEI
KSTT
KAPO
KSTS
KLSO
KWNN
KPOA
KHSA
KNPP
KPAONZ
KBTS
KWWW
KY
KJRE
KPAOKMDRKE
KCRCM
KSCS
KWMNCI
KESO
KWUN
KPLS
KIIP
KEDEM
KPAOY
KRIF
KGICKS
KREF
KTRD
KFRDSOCIRO
KTAO
KJU
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KO
KNEI
KEMR
KKIV
KEAI
KWAC
KRCIM
KWCI
KFIU
KWIC
KCORR
KOMS
KNNO
KPAI
KBWG
KTTB
KTBD
KTIALG
KILS
KFEM
KTDM
KESS
KNUC
KPA
KOMCCO
KCEM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KWN
KERG
KLTN
KALM
KCCP
KSUMPHUM
KREL
KGH
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KWMM
KVRP
KVRC
KAID
KSLG
KDEMK
KX
KIF
KNPR
KCFC
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KCERS
KMOC
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KEPREL
KBTR
KEDU
KNP
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KISLPINR
KTPN
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KTDD
KAKA
KFRP
KWNM
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KWWMN
KECF
KWBC
KPRO
KVBL
KOM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KEDM
KFLD
KLPM
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KPFO
KDP
KCMR
KRMS
KNPT
KNNNP
KTIAPARM
KDTB
KNUP
KPGOV
KNAP
KNNC
KUK
KSRE
KREISLER
KIVP
KQ
KTIAEUN
KPALAOIS
KRM
KISLAO
KWM
KFLOA
LE
LU
LH
LA
LG
LO
LY
LANTERN
LI
LABOR
LORAN
LTTE
LT
LAS
LAB
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LAURA
LS
LOTT
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LAOS
LOG
LN
LB
MOPS
MO
MARR
ML
MASS
MZ
MR
MNUC
MX
MV
MCC
MY
MEDIA
MTCRE
MG
MCAP
MOPPS
MP
MI
MK
MC
MD
MA
MU
MASC
MW
MT
MEPP
MN
MTCR
MH
MEPI
MIL
MNUCPTEREZ
MMAR
MICHAEL
MUNC
MDC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MAS
MEPN
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MOOPS
MSG
MARITIME
MURRAY
MUKASEY
MOTO
MCA
MFO
MEX
MRSEC
MMED
MACP
MAAR
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MCCAIN
MF
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MILITANTS
MINORITIES
MTS
MLS
MILI
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MIK
MARK
MBM
MPP
MILITARY
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
MRCRE
MTRE
MORALES
MAP
MCTRE
MHUC
MOPSGRPARM
MOROCCO
MCAPS
NL
NU
NS
NI
NPT
NATO
NO
NG
NATEU
NSF
NZ
NAS
NP
NDP
NLD
NGO
NEPAD
NAFTA
NASA
NEA
NGUYEN
NIH
NK
NIPP
NONE
NR
NANCY
NEGROPONTE
NRR
NERG
NSSP
NSG
NSFO
NE
NATSIOS
NFSO
NATIONAL
NTDB
NT
NCD
NTSB
NRC
NELSON
NAM
NH
NPG
NEC
NSC
NFATC
NMFS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NARC
NCCC
NA
NC
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
NOAA
NON
NTTC
NKNNP
NMNUC
NUMBERING
ODIP
OIIP
OPRC
OSCE
OREP
OTRA
OPET
OSCI
OVIP
OECD
OCII
OUALI
OPDC
OEXC
OFPD
OPIC
OFDP
OPCW
OECV
OAS
OM
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
ORA
OIC
OEXCSCULKPAO
OIG
OASS
OFFICIALS
ORTA
OSAC
OIL
OIE
OEXP
OPEC
OPDAT
OMS
OES
OHI
OMAR
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
ORC
OAU
OXEC
OA
ODPC
OPDP
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OASC
OSHA
OPCD
OTR
OPPI
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OFDA
OPICEAGR
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
OCEA
OVP
ON
OPAD
OTAR
OCS
ODC
OTRD
OCED
OSD
ORUE
OREG
PHUM
PINR
PTER
PGOV
PREL
PREF
PL
PM
PHSA
PE
PARM
PINS
PK
PUNE
PO
PALESTINIAN
PU
PBTS
PROP
PTBS
POL
POLI
PA
PGOVZI
POLMIL
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLM
PD
POLITICS
POLICY
PAS
PMIL
PINT
PNAT
PV
PKO
PPOL
PERSONS
PING
PBIO
PH
PETR
PARMS
PRES
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PT
PLAB
PP
PAK
PDEM
PKPA
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PTERM
PJUS
PSOE
PELOSI
PROPERTY
PGOVPREL
PARP
PRL
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PBOV
PAO
PKK
PROV
PHSAK
PHUMPREL
PROTECTION
PGOVBL
PSI
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PUM
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PRIVATIZATION
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PREC
PAIGH
PROG
PSHA
PARK
PETER
POG
PHUS
PPREL
PS
PTERPREL
PRELPGOV
POV
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PWBG
PMAR
PREM
PAR
PNR
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PARTM
PN
PRE
PTE
PY
POLUN
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PIRF
PGOVPM
PBST
PRELEVU
PGOR
PBTSRU
PRM
PRELKPAOIZ
PGVO
PERL
PGOC
PAGR
PMIN
PHUMR
PVIP
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PHAS
PODC
PRHUM
PHUMA
PREO
PPA
PEPFAR
PGO
PRGOV
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PINOCHET
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PRELC
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PRELSW
PAHO
PEDRO
PRELA
PASS
PPAO
PGPV
PNUM
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PHUMPGOV
PVOV
PHSAPREL
PROLIFERATION
PENA
PRELTBIOBA
PIN
PRELL
PGOVPTER
PHAM
PHYTRP
PTEL
PTERPGOV
PHARM
PROTESTS
PRELAF
PKBL
PRELKPAO
PKNP
PARMP
PHUML
PFOV
PERM
PUOS
PRELGOV
PHUMPTER
PARAGRAPH
PERURENA
PBTSEWWT
PCI
PETROL
PINSO
PINSCE
PQL
PEREZ
PBS
RS
REFUGEES
RW
RP
RELFREE
RO
REGIONAL
RIGHTS
REACTION
REPORT
RU
RENAMO
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RM
REFUGEE
REL
RELATIONS
ROW
RREL
REGION
RATIFICATION
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RODHAM
ROBERT
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
RELIGIOUS
RUEHZO
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
RSO
RCMP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
RENE
REID
RUPREL
RMA
RI
REMON
RPEL
RFE
RFIN
RA
RAFAEL
RAY
RUS
RPREL
ROBERTG
RECIN
RAMONTEIJELO
SNAR
SP
SN
SMIG
SL
SOCI
SU
SG
SF
SENV
SZ
SOE
SCUL
SY
SO
SR
SYR
SE
SA
SW
SIPDIS
SCIENCE
SADC
SI
SCI
SOCIETY
SC
SAARC
STR
SECRETARY
SANC
SSH
ST
SNA
SGWI
SEP
SOCIS
SETTLEMENTS
SPECIALIST
SK
SHUM
START
STET
SCVL
SREF
SCHUL
SCUIL
SYRIA
SECURITY
SPCE
SYAI
SMIL
SOWGC
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
SPP
SCUD
SOM
SPECI
SMIGBG
SENC
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SACU
SENVSPL
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCOI
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SM
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
STATE
SENS
SUBJECT
SFNV
SECSTATE
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SANR
SPSTATE
SMITH
SCOM
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
SNARM
SIPDI
SCPR
SNIG
SELAB
SULLIVAN
SENVENV
SECDEF
SOLIC
SOIC
SPAS
SASC
SOSI
SEC
SEN
SENVCASCEAIDID
TU
TH
TW
TSPA
TRGY
TPHY
TBIO
TIFA
TS
TZ
TX
TSPL
TT
TK
TC
TINT
TERFIN
TERRORISM
TIP
TURKEY
TI
TECHNOLOGY
TNGD
TRSY
TRAFFICKING
TOPEC
TPSL
TP
TD
TR
TA
TIO
TREATY
TO
THPY
TECH
TRADE
TPSA
TG
TAGS
TF
TRAD
THKSJA
TVBIO
TNDG
TN
TBIOZK
TWI
TV
TWL
TRT
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRBIO
TL
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
TPP
TE
THANH
TJ
TBKIO
UNGA
USUN
UN
UG
UNSC
UK
UP
US
UNCTAD
UNVIE
UNHRC
USTR
UNAMA
UNCRIME
UNESCO
UV
UNDP
UNHCR
UNCSD
UNCHR
UZ
USAID
UNEP
UNO
UNPUOS
UY
UNDC
UNCITRAL
UNAUS
UNCND
UA
UNMIK
USTDA
USEU
USDA
UNICEF
UR
UNFICYP
USNC
USTRRP
UNODC
UNRWA
UNOMIG
USTRPS
USAU
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNFPA
UNSCE
USSC
UGA
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNION
UNCLASSIFIED
USPS
UNA
UMIK
USOAS
UNMOVIC
UNFA
UNAIDS
UNCHC
USGS
UNSE
UNRCR
UNTERR
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNCSW
UNSCR
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
USCG
UNIDROIT
UNSCD
UPU
UNBRO
UNECE
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
VM
VE
VT
VETTING
VN
VZ
VIS
VC
VTPREL
VIP
VTEAID
VTEG
VOA
VA
VTIZ
VANG
VISIT
VO
VENZ
VAT
VI
VEPREL
VEN
WFP
WTO
WHO
WTRO
WBG
WMO
WIPO
WA
WI
WSIS
WHA
WCL
WE
WMN
WEBZ
WS
WAR
WZ
WMD
WW
WILLIAM
WEET
WAEMU
WM
WWBG
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WRTO
WB
WHTI
WBEG
WCI
WEF
WAKI
WHOA
WGC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08PARIS1029, UNESCO SPRING EXECUTIVE BOARD: POLITICAL ISSUES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08PARIS1029.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08PARIS1029 | 2008-05-30 09:09 | 2011-08-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXRO6718
RR RUEHAP RUEHFL RUEHGI RUEHGR RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMA RUEHMJ RUEHMR
RUEHPA RUEHPB RUEHQU RUEHRN
DE RUEHFR #1029/01 1510909
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 300909Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3203
INFO RUCNSCO/UNESCO COLLECTIVE
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM 0318
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 PARIS 001029
SIPDIS
FROM USMISSION TO UNESCO PARIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
SUBJECT: UNESCO SPRING EXECUTIVE BOARD: POLITICAL ISSUES
¶1. (SBU) Summary: UNESCO's April 1-17 Executive Board was a success
for the United States. On the whole, we enjoyed good working
relations with countries in other geographic groups. Regional
voting blocs and economic and other groupings, such as the
Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the G-77 initially sought
confrontation on several issues but later showed flexibility. Most
notably, Cuba and Iran fell far short when they tried to submit a
draft initiative on human rights and cultural diversity that was
intended to polarize the organization between the non-aligned and
others.
¶2. (SBU) On major policy issues (internal management-organizational
issues septel), we were able once again to adopt consensually
without debate a resolution on Jerusalem and the Mughrabi Gate
ascent to the Temple Mount. A Venezuelan initiative for a treaty on
the preservation of indigenous languages was deferred for
consideration at a later Executive Board, largely because Venezuela
had failed to follow through on its undertaking to provide
extra-budgetary funding for a preliminary experts' study of what
would be needed. (N.B. The Board did not accept any proposals for
new normative instruments.) Finally, the Board endorsed a refined
(and significantly pared down) plan of action for the commemoration
of the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
that included a U.S. suggestion that the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights be translated into an additional 120 indigenous
languages, if possible. The decision "invites the Director-General
to seek extra-budgetary resources" to ensure implementation of the a
number of elements in the refined plan.
¶3. (SBU) We did not, of course, get everything we wanted or entirely
avoid controversy. We would have preferred, for example, that the
Mughrabi Gate issue not be treated as a separate agenda item, as the
issue is a technical matter more appropriately addressed by the
World Heritage Committee and, within the Executive Board as one of a
cluster of progress reports routinely made by the Director General
on pending matters. A last minute maneuver by Egypt (against the
highly unusual combined opposition of Israel, Jordan, and the
Palestinians) resulted in the adoption of a decision that retained
the Mughrabi Gate issue on the Executive Board's future as an
element of the "Jerusalem" issue.
¶4. (SBU) On a more concerning note, a U.S. decision to invoke its
right to request permission to observe private sessions of the
Committee on Conventions and Recommendations (CR) as it reviews
human rights complaints, even though we are not a member of the CR,
met with heated opposition from Cuba and South Africa and statements
of concern from France and Luxembourg. The rarity of requests like
ours by sitting Executive Board Member States, combined with the
fact that both the rules and past precedent allowed for such
observer participation, caught opponents by surprise and led some
to argue that the presence of the U.S. or other observers would
somehow chill the committee's debates. An obviously, uncomfortable
German committee chair after consulting UNESCO's Legal Adviser and
the Bureau ruled in our favor taking the view that the rules of
procedure cannot be changed during an Executive Board session. We
need to be alert, however, for a move to change those rules at a
succeeding Board session. Finally, Serbian Foreign Minister Jeremic
strongly denounced the alleged destruction of Serbian cultural
monuments in Kosovo and served notice that Serbia will look to
UNESCO to help protect cultural sites in the face of "the danger
posed by the unilateral, illegal, and illegitimate declaration of
independence by the Kosovo Albanians on February 17." End Summary.
¶5. (U) The 58 members of UNESCO's Executive Board (EB) met in Paris
April 1-17 for the Board's 179th session. This was the first
substantive Board meeting since last October's General Conference
and a key opportunity to set the tone for the biennium now
beginning. This message examines the key political issues at the
Board. A separate message will report on the Board's consideration
of issues relating to UNESCO's internal organization and management.
CUBAN DRAFT DECISION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY
¶6. (SBU) Cuba began a four-year term on the Board with a strong
effort to revive UNESCO's dormant non-aligned caucus (NAM) of which
it is the chair and polarize the membership along north-south lines.
In doing so, it worked hand-in-glove with Iran (not currently a
Board member). UNESCO almost always operates on consensus with most
measures adopted by consensus. Friendly diplomats on developing
country delegations, however, warned us just before the Board that
in meetings of the NAM Cuba was talking openly of forcing votes and
was trying to win support from NAM members to launch several
initiatives that the north would be certain to oppose. Among these
was a suggestion from Iran that the NAM submit a resolution on the
"right to scientific knowledge." Thanks, we are told, to the strong
opposition of India, Cuba and Iran failed to win the backing of the
NAM for such a measure .
PARIS 00001029 002 OF 006
¶7. (SBU) Cuba and Iran did, however, win agreement to the submission
of a draft decision that requested UNESCO take note of the
Declaration on "Human Rights and Cultural Diversity" that was
adopted by the September 2007 NAM Ministerial in Tehran. As
submitted initially, the draft recommended that UNESCO use the
Tehran declaration during its celebration the 60th anniversary of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It would also have
required UNESCO to cooperate with the NAM Center for Human Rights
and Cultural Diversity in Tehran, as well as insert an item on
"Human Rights and Cultural Diversity" on the agenda of the Spring
2009 Executive Board session.
¶8. (SBU) The Cubans' draft resolution aroused strong opposition
among Western countries (Group I). In several heated Group I
meetings, many states expressed resentment at the apparent link
being made between the 2005 Convention on the Diversity of Cultural
Expressions and the body of generally accepted human rights, as well
as the implied limitation on full respect for all human rights when
such rights are inconsistent with dominant cultural mores. France
and Belgium were adamant about their readiness to call for a vote on
the Cuban draft, if necessary. Italy recalled in that advocates of
the 2005 convention had explicitly assured the U.S. that the
convention had nothing to do with human rights. Greece strongly
condemned a blatant effort at "forum shopping." The Greek
ambassador pointed out that the United Nations General Assembly
(UNGA) had spent three weeks debating a resolution referring to the
Tehran NAM Declaration and had in the end only agreed to take note
of that document. Cuba and Iran should get less in Paris than they
got in New York, he insisted.
¶9. (SBU) In the end, the Norwegian EB Vice Chair Einar Steensnaes
(representing Group I) held a series of tense negotiating sessions
with NAM representatives that continued until the afternoon of the
Board's very last day. In these discussions, European Union members
were keen to have the NAM agree to language that reiterated that
universality of human rights and removed direct reference to the
Tehran Declaration. (The French told us that they suspected the
Iranians' ultimate goal was to create cultural exceptions to
otherwise universal human rights standards.) Numerous formulations
were tried, as was a general reference to the 1993 Vienna Plan of
Action. When NAM representatives would not accept such a reference,
France with support from Italy, Belgium, and other Europeans
announced it was instructed to seek a vote. At this, however, the
NAM recoiled. Even though the Cubans' original intention had
probably been to force such an outcome, the other NAM members
clearly did not want to break UNESCO's tradition of consensus and
leave the organization divided and politicized. In the end, the NAM
agreed to a resolution that referred only to the General Assembly
resolution (62/155) -- not the underlying Tehran Declaration -- and
quotes language from the Vienna Plan of Action that reaffirms that
all human rights are universal, while tasking the UNESCO
Director-General to "report on UNESCO's activities on human rights
and cultural diversity, through the Executive Board, in order to
contribute to the Secretary-General's report on this subject" at the
64th General Assembly session.
Jerusalem and Mughrabi Gate Issues
¶10. (SBU) Jerusalem and the Mughrabi Ascent to the Temple Mount
bulked large at this session as they have at recent Board meetings.
While UNESCO was once again able to avoid divisive debate and adopt
resolutions on these topics by consensus, there was extensive and
sometimes heated discussion in the corridors outside the meeting.
¶11. (SBU) The essential issue was whether the Mughrabi Ascent should
be treated as a stand-alone agenda item, and if not, whether it
should be subsumed within the resolution on Jerusalem that is taken
up at each session as a separate item. In recent Executive Boards,
for reasons that were unique to those sessions, there has been one
resolution on maintaining the character of Jerusalem and another
regarding the Mughrabi Ascent to the Temple Mount. At this Board
session, it no longer made sense to keep the Mughrabi Ascent as a
separate agenda item as the issue was referred to the World Heritage
Committee last year. In taking this position, the U.S. was joined
by Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian observer delegation.
¶12. (SBU) Egypt, nonetheless, was determined to keep the Mughrabi
Ascent as a separate item on the Executive Board's agenda and
skillfully manipulated Executive Board Chairman Ya'i (Benin) to
facilitate this outcome. The U.S. was forced to intervene in the
first minutes of the opening Plenary to object to the inclusion on
the formal agenda of an item on this subject. We argued the item
could be dealt with in the Director-General's progress report to the
Board on actions taken to implement past Executive Board decisions;
any additional actions should be agreed at the World Heritage
Committee.
PARIS 00001029 003 OF 006
¶13. (SBU) Deputy Director-General Barbosa attempted to defuse the
problem by folding the Mughrabi Ascent issue into a second "section"
of the draft decision that dealt with the character of Jerusalem.
Egypt eventually accepted inclusion of language on the Mughrabi
issue in the larger draft Jerusalem decision, but worked behind the
scenes with Chairman Ya'i and the Secretariat to have a separate
topic on Mughrabi Gate included in the agenda at the last moment,
although the draft decision presented on this topic was purely
pro-forma. The important language on the Mughrabi ascent issue wound
up in the Jerusalem resolution. Notably, as finally adopted, the
latter decision invites the Director-General to make a progress on
the issue. This decision is ambiguous as to when and in what form
the progress report is to be made.
¶14. (SBU) The U.S. made a statement for the record after the
decision was adopted, indicating that it would make formal
objections in the future should the Mughrabi Ascent be again put on
the agenda as a separate item. Only Egypt and Algeria spoke
afterwards, reaffirming their view that the Mughrabi Ascent is of
sufficient importance to require its review as a separate issue.
INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES
¶15. (SBU) Before the Board's opening, it had been widely assumed
that the language issue would dominate these proceedings. This is
the UN's Year of Languages, and Venezuela had convinced the Spring
2007 Board to adopt a decision, requesting the Director-General to
"conduct a preliminary study of the technical and legal aspects of a
possible international standard-setting instrument for the
protection of indigenous and endangered languages . . . . and to
submit such a preliminary study to the Executive Board" at its
Spring 2008 session. EB Chairman Ya'i did little to conceal his
support for the idea of a new standard-setting instrument, believing
fervently as he does, that African children must receive some of
their education in their native languages.
¶16. (SBU) In any event, the push for a new treaty on languages
stalled. While the Latin American states did not wish to publicly
disagree with Venezuela, current chair of the Latin American group,
we understand many expressed reservations when the Latin group met
behind closed doors. Most important, there was no preliminary study
for the Board to discuss because, after winning agreement to conduct
such a study, Venezuela failed to provide the extra-budgetary funds
needed to carry it out.
COMMEMORATION OF THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UDHR
¶17. (SBU) Prior to this Executive Board meeting, the U.S.
Delegation anticipated that consideration of UNESCO's proposed plan
for commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights would lead to heated controversy as happened when
the plan was first presented to the General Conference last October.
At that time, the Secretariat's ambitious plans for a series of
regional conferences and two large international meetings, all
intended to focus on emerging rights, provoked vigorous debate
following which the General Conference refused to "endorse" the
original plan and called for a "refined plan" for approval at this
Executive Board session.
¶18. (SBU) Debate on this issue turned out to be calmer at this Board
session than at the General Conference last October. In the end,
two decisions on this topic were adopted with little fanfare. One
was a scaled back version of the original plan but with deeper
Member State ownership and input, for most of which the
Director-General will seek extra-budgetary funding. (N.B. The list
included a U.S. suggestion that the Universal Declaration be
translated into as many as 120 additional indigenous languages. A
symbolic U.S. contribution toward the costs of such translation will
be needed to re-affirm U.S. credibility on this issue.) A second
decision submitted by Colombia with significant support from other
Latin American states requested the Director-General to provide
intellectual support for a regional human rights conference in
Colombia and asked him to mobilize the intellectual and human
resources needed to organize this event, "it being understood that
conference's logistical expenses will be covered by the host
country."
OTHER ISSUES
¶19. (SBU) EDUCATION: Few other issues provoked the drama or
controversy of the ones already mentioned. There were, however,
several significant education issues on the agenda. The Board, for
example, adopted without debate a decision on Educational and
Cultural Institutions in the occupied Arab Territories. Adopted
also was a progress report on the application of the Global Action
Plan to achieve the Education for All (EFA) goals by 2015. On that
item, this Delegation was successful in ensuring that the language
in the draft decision clarified that there were other financial
PARIS 00001029 004 OF 006
mechanisms in addition to the Fast Track Initiative (FTI) that were
funding EFA. WE also expanded the meaning of the term "multi-lateral
assistance" to include "promoting national leadership, capacity
development, communication and advocacy, resource mobilization and
effective use of aid through existing mechanisms" so that it was not
limited to financial assistance. Finally, there was broad support
for a German draft decision requesting a UNESCO strategy on
Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Over half of the
delegations, including the United States, agreed to cosponsor this
proposal.
¶20. (U) A Latin-proposed measure on PRELAC (Regional Education
Project for Latin America and the Caribbean) was postponed until the
autumn 2008 Executive Board at the request of the Latin American
countries, because the UNESCO-prepared document blatantly failed to
reflect the decisions taken by the Latin American Ministers of
Education at the second Intergovernmental Committee meeting of
PRELAC in March, 2007.
¶21. (SBU) The most controversial education item was a decision on
the Joint Experts Seventh Meeting on the Right to Education. The
United States had concerns that both the summary and the draft
decision referred to "normative bases" and could imply that UNESCO
and the Joint Experts group were seeking new normative instruments
in this area. The United States, working through the Portuguese
Delegation, was successful in ensuring that the draft resolution
expressly referred to "existing" normative bases so it is clear that
no new normative instruments would be created or implied regarding
this topic.
¶22. (U) SCIENCE: Natural Science issues generated little debate at
this Board. Discussion of UNESCO's Draft Climate Change Strategy
generated nothing like the controversy it did when first discussed
last October. It was not adopted, however. About 25 members of the
Executive Board spoke, most favorably. St. Kitts and Nevis
encouraged greater emphasis on Small Island Developing States
(SIDS), and added language to increase emphasis on SIDS and other
less developed countries. The US requested a reduction in the
emphasis on renewable energy based on a desire to focus resources in
areas of demonstrated UNESCO competence. Luxembourg supported this
position. Norway encouraged greater focus and asked for a revised
plan with specifics on value added, significant contributions, and
measurable results. A revised plan will be submitted at the 181st
Executive Board meeting. The US also requested that the key
concerns of Member States, expressed at the meeting, be addressed.
¶23. (U) Member States also supported an Ethiopian proposal to make
2011 the International Year of Chemistry.
¶24. (U) Also considered were several so-called category 2 centers,
centers that are paid for by the host countries but are supposed to
assist UNESCO in its work. Two proposed centers, one in China and
the other in the Korean Republic aroused little opposition, although
several members questioned whether two centers dedicated to the
preservation of intangible cultural heritage of the Asia-Pacific
region were needed in such close proximity to each other. The
Secretariat was asked to prepare a feasibility study on these and to
report on its findings at the autumn 2008 session of the Board.
¶25. (SBU) A Chinese proposal to establish a Category 2 Center
managed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences to monitor cultural and
natural sites, including World Heritage Sites and World Biosphere
Reserves, using satellite remote sensing techniques aroused an
extended debate. Approximately 20 countries endorsed the proposal
with only minor criticisms. Most speakers noted the important
capacity-building aspects and hoped to cooperate with the Center.
The Japanese, however, remarked that no current activities existed
between their space agency (JAXA) and the CAS, although China had
claimed some cooperation with Japan in the proposal. The US spoke
positively about the Center but attempted to add language that would
require for all such Centers, starting with Category II Centers
approved at this Board session, a standing requirement to obtain an
external review before the Center could be renewed by UNESCO. China
agreed, in principle, that reviews of centers should be encouraged
but wanted the matter deferred and considered in a larger context.
Brazil stated that there was a provision for review in the model
agreement for centers in Annex II, Article 16 of the 33C/Resolution
¶90. This article permits review by the Director-General with a
presentation of the results at the Executive Board. Language to
request a review by the Director-General of the Center prior to
renewal under Article 16 was accepted.
DIFFICULT POINTS AND WARNING FLAGS
¶26. (SBU) CR: Not everything went our way. Disagreements emerged
that signal serious problems at future Executive Boards. In
addition to the second agenda item on the Mughrabi Gate (see above),
the U.S. request to observe the private deliberations of the
PARIS 00001029 005 OF 006
Committee on Conventions and Recommendations (CR) touched off
fireworks that may have reverberations at the Board session next
autumn. Despite the CR Chairman's approval (Germany), several
countries, including Cuba and South Africa, registered strong and
continuing protests against the U.S. presence in the room, while
France and Luxembourg indicated discomfort with such a practice,
invoking vaguely articulated reasons. The central argument invoked
against having an observer present was that an observer could
compromise the confidentiality of the (human rights) "cases" being
discussed. The U.S., however, was clear that, while countries whose
cases are being reviewed by the Committee should never be present
during the CR's debate over what conclusions should be drawn and how
to report to the Executive Board, all Executive Board members can be
entrusted to respect the confidentiality of CR proceedings and hence
"private" meetings should never exclude sitting Executive Board
members. (Note: All member states may sit in as observers at all
Executive Board sessions and at meetings of its subsidiary bodies
and committees.) Moreover, there has not to date been any known
instance of an observer State violating the confidentiality of any
CR proceeding.
¶27. (SBU) The issue was discussed with UNESCO's Legal Adviser and in
the Bureau. It was acknowledged that the rules do not prohibit such
observer status and it was determined that the existing rules of
procedure could not be revised during the current Executive Board
session. We believe that the rules are clear that all UNESCO
meetings, whether called "private" or "open" may be observed by, at
the very least, all sitting Executive Board Members. "Private"
should be interpreted as meaning that such meetings may not be
viewed by the general public or other UN agencies. We can expect,
however, that the question of which countries may observe various
meetings will come up again at a future Board meeting, and we could
well face a move to change the rules to make observer presence at
private sessions impossible. We should begin to muster compelling
legal arguments that can be deployed when that debate arises.
¶28. (U) Serbia/Kosovo: Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic used
his remarks during the general debate at the opening of the
Executive Board to deliver a stern warning that Serbia may seek in
future to raise at UNESCO the issue of preservation of Serbian
cultural monuments in Kosovo. In a highly emotional statement that
won scattered applause from other delegations he declared that "the
greatest challenge to human rights in Serbia lies in our southern
province of Kosovo under United Nations administration since June
1999 . . . . More than 150 churches or monasteries . . . have been
set ablaze by Kosovo Albanian extremists in the past eight years . .
. . Hundreds of other holy sites remain at risk . . . The purposeful
attempt to vandalize, loot, burn, desecrate, and destroy what others
have built long ago . . . (to) invent an historical narrative of
one's own must be condemned in the strongest possible terms, and
identified clearly for what they are: revolting acts of cultural
cleansing."
COMMENT:
¶29. (SBU) By the standards of past UNESCO meetings, the spring
Executive Board was a model of how well UNESCO can function, in
spite of itself. While regional blocs maintained their outward
solidarity, they were not as rigid or as determined to thwart the
U.S. as in meetings past. Behind the scenes, for example, other
Latin countries clearly exercised a restraining influence on Cuba
(and Venezuela, not on the Board but currently Latin American Group
chairman).
¶30. (SBU) Notably, the Board did not adopt any new initiatives
intended to lead to new normative instruments, with one possible
exception. A superficially-prepared initiative by the Secretariat
to have the Board adopt a formal recommendation on the preservation
of historic urban areas ran into significant opposition from many
delegations. The experts committee that recommended this measure
was composed largely of German and Austrian experts and had little
geographic balance. As a result, its conclusions received a cold
reception from delegations from other regions. Member states by and
large felt the matter was not ripe for consideration by the Board.
In the end, they welcomed the fact that the issue will be considered
by the World Heritage Committee at its upcoming meeting in Quebec in
July 2008, and invited the Director-General to "submit at its 181st
(spring 2009) session a full preliminary study of the technical and
legal aspects of this issue.
¶31. (SBU) It is not clear how long this period of relative harmony
will last. It may well be short. A slight shift in attitudes would
be all that is needed to leave the U.S. in serious difficulties.
The fact that the U.S. is no longer on the Bureau (the committee of
highly influential members who organize Board meetings) means that
our ability to prevent mischievous items from receiving serious
consideration is much reduced. We must also contend with the
personality of Executive Board Chairman Ya'i who famously remarked
PARIS 00001029 006 OF 006
at a meeting a year ago that he might be a chairman but could not be
neutral. We have seen some indications of a similar attitude on his
part in recent months. He has, for example, openly used the power
of the chair to promote a new normative instrument on indigenous
languages. We will need to stay very much alert for tricky
maneuvers by him that may be contrary to our interests.
¶32. (SBU) Finally, we will need to be wary of the fact that many of
our colleagues do not measure success or progress as we do. The
relative harmony that prevailed at this meeting is not to everyone's
taste, including many relatively moderate member states. In talking
with our colleagues from other delegations about the most recent
Executive Board, we often hear the complaint that it was boring.
Many of our colleagues regretted that there were no major
controversies to attract international attention, and there was no
agreement to begin negotiation of new international treaties.
Regrettably, many other delegations seem to measure UNESCO's
achievements largely in terms of treaties agreed. Given these
attitudes, we should expect more turbulence in these waters in the
period ahead.
OLIVER