Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08MANILA1050, Hunger and Poverty Worsen in the Philippines

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08MANILA1050.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08MANILA1050 2008-05-02 04:47 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Manila
VZCZCXRO3639
OO RUEHCHI RUEHCN RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHML #1050/01 1230447
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 020447Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY MANILA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0577
INFO RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS IMMEDIATE
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI//FPA//
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 MANILA 001050 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/MTS, EAP/EP, EEB/IFD/OMA 
STATE PASS EXIM, OPIC, AND USTR 
STATE PASS USAID FOR AA/ANE, AA/EGAT, DAA/ANE 
TREASURY FOR OASIA 
USDOC FOR 4430/ITA/MAC/ASIA & PAC/KOREA & SE ASIA/ASEAN 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN PGOV RP
SUBJECT:  Hunger and Poverty Worsen in the Philippines 
 
REF:  A) Manila 0367, B) Manila 0838 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
1.  (U) Summary:  Recently-released Philippine government statistics 
indicate poverty increased in 2006 to engulf a third of the 
population.  There has been little progress in reducing poverty or 
addressing the uneven distribution of incomes.  The recent surge in 
the price of rice will push even more Filipinos into poverty.  The 
government will have to balance any food subsidy or hunger 
alleviation programs against its ambitious fiscal goals.  Measures 
needed to fight poverty include a macroeconomic and policy reforms 
conducive to economic growth, investment, and job creation; 
population policies; improved infrastructure, education, and health 
care; and reforms in the agricultural sector to bring about higher 
productivity.  End Summary. 
 
Poverty and Hunger Increase Between 2003 and 2006 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
2.  (U) According to the Philippine government's recently released 
2006 poverty statistics -- generated every three years from the 
Family Income and Expenditures Surveys (FIES) -- the ratio of 
families with insufficient income to meet basic needs increased from 
24.4% to nearly 27% of total families between 2003 and 2006.  The 
ratio of poor Filipinos unable to afford basic food and non-food 
requirements increased to a third of the population (or 3.8 million 
more poor Filipinos than in 2003).  Moreover, the number of poor 
families and Filipinos below the government estimate of incomes 
needed to meet even basic food requirements (i.e., the "subsistence 
poor") also expanded, to 11% of total families and 14.6% of the 
population. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
     Selected Poverty Statistics 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
                                            Increase 
                           2003   2006   In %  Millions 
                           ----   ----   ----  -------- 
 
 
Poverty Incidence (%) 
  Families                 24.4   26.9 
  Population               30.0   32.9 
 
Number of Poor (Millions) 
  Families                  4.0    4.7   17.5    0.7 
  Individuals              23.8   27.6   16.0    3.8 
 
Subsistence Incidence (%) 
  Families                 10.2   11.0 
  Population               13.5   14.6 
 
Number of Subsistence 
Poor (Millions) 
  Families                  1.7    1.9   11.8    0.2 
  Individual               10.8   12.2   13.0    1.4 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board 
 
 
3.  (U) Government officials noted that their estimates of incomes 
required to meet minimum food and non-food requirements grew at a 
faster pace (22%) than average household incomes (16%) between 2003 
and 2006.  They cited high fuel prices, transportation costs, 
increased tax burdens, and weather disturbances between 2005 and 
2006 as major factors behind the higher poverty rates. 
 
No Progress Over Past Decade 
---------------------------- 
 
4.  (U) Except for a brief decline in the poverty ratios between the 
2000 and 2003 surveys, government statistics indicate that there has 
been no real progress in reducing Philippine poverty rates over the 
past decade.  The official 2006 poverty ratios were little improved 
from 1997.  Moreover, the modest overall improvement in the poverty 
ratios between 1997 and 2006 failed to translate to nominal declines 
in the number of poor families and Filipinos -- which increased by 
700,000 and 2.6 million, respectively, from 1997. 
 
5.  (U) Other non-government sources of poverty statistics suggest 
that poverty in the country may be more severe than the official 
 
MANILA 00001050  002 OF 004 
 
 
data indicate.  The World Bank estimates that about 43% of the 
Philippine population live below the $2/day international poverty 
line (compare, for example, with 25% for Thailand).  According to 
quarterly surveys on self-rated poverty conducted by the 
Philippines' foremost private social survey institute (Social 
Weather Stations), an average 18% of families experienced hunger and 
50% of families considered themselves poor, in 2007. 
 
Inequitable Income Distribution Has Persisted 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
6.  (U) The Philippines' Gini coefficient, which measures inequality 
of income, improved almost imperceptibly from 0.460 in 2003 to 0.458 
in 2006.  (Note:  A measure of income distribution, the value of the 
coefficient ranges from 0 or perfect equality, to 1 or perfect 
inequality.  Lower values indicate more equal distribution of 
income.)  Since 1985, the value for the Philippines -- also 
published every three years -- has fluctuated within a narrow band 
of 0.445 (recorded in 1988) and 0.487 (recorded in 1997).  High 
income disparity has persisted during the last two decades. 
According to the 2006 survey, the richest 30% of families earned 
nearly two-thirds of total incomes, while the poorest 30% shared 
barely 9%.  The total income accruing to the richest 10% of families 
was close to 20 times the total income shared by the poorest 10% of 
families. 
 
More than 50% of Families Chronic or Transient Poor 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
7.  (U) Economists who studied the 1997, 2000, and 2003 official 
poverty data in detail found that roughly 22% of families were 
"chronic poor" (i.e., falling below the government-estimated poverty 
thresholds in each of the three periods) and another 32% "transient 
poor" (i.e., moved into and/or out of poverty).  This may explain 
the perception on the part of more than half of Filipinos that they 
are poor.  Although they may not fit any of the definitions of the 
poor today, they have in the past and expect to do so again in the 
future. 
 
Narrow Middle Class, Large Low Income Class 
------------------------------------------- 
 
8.  (U) According to the latest available estimates by the 
government's National Statistical Coordination Board, the agency 
that generates the official poverty statistics, the Filipino middle 
class comprised 19.9% of total families during 2003, down from 23% 
in 1997.  On the other hand, the ratio of low income families grew 
from 76.6% in 1997 to 79.9% in 2003.  High income families comprised 
a small share (less than 0.5%) of all families.  Although not all 
"low income" families are necessarily "poor" when measured against 
the government's poverty thresholds, their predominance indicates 
the vulnerability of many Filipino families to poverty. 
 
9.  (U) Officials estimate that families of Filipinos working 
overseas comprise 5%-6% of Philippine families.   About half of 
these families fall in the middle-income segment; most of the other 
half falls in the low income group. 
 
Large Disparities across Regions and Provinces 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
10.  (U) Underlying the national-level poverty figures are 
persistently large disparities among regions and provinces.  In 
2006, for example, the National Capital Region (Metro Manila) 
registered a 10.4% poverty incidence among its population while the 
worst-off region (the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao) posted a 
62% poverty rate.  The ten least poor provinces during 2006 were all 
located on Luzon Island, while six of the ten worst off-provinces 
were in Mindanao (with poverty incidence of the population highest 
at nearly 80% for the Muslim province of Tawi-Tawi).  Overall, 47% 
of Mindanao's population subsisted below government-established 
poverty thresholds, much higher than Luzon's 28% poverty ratio. 
 
Economic Growth Necessary... 
---------------------------- 
 
11.  (U) Economists have proven quantitatively the correlation 
between economic growth and poverty alleviation.  In the 
Philippines, real growth of GDP per capita has been slower than in 
neighboring countries.  The Philippines has not been able to sustain 
economic growth rates significantly higher than population growth. 
 
 
MANILA 00001050  003 OF 004 
 
 
12.  (SBU) According to the government's latest census, the 
Philippine population grew by 2.04% annually between 2000 and 2007, 
lower than the 2.3% rate recorded in the 1990's but still markedly 
higher than in most Southeast Asian countries (including 0.8%, 1.3%, 
and 1.4% for Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam, respectively).  The 
ongoing global food crisis (Ref B) has sparked worries about the 
Philippines' ability to feed its rapidly growing population and 
revived debates over population policy.  However, the issue remains 
particularly contentious in this predominantly Catholic country. 
 
13.  (SBU) Although there have been improvements in recent years, 
real per capita GDP growth averaged barely 1% from 1980-2007.  By 
most estimates, the Philippines needs to sustain real GDP growth of 
at least 7%-8% per year to achieve more significant progress in 
poverty reduction.  However, even sustaining the three-decade high 
7.3% GDP expansion achieved in 2007 (only a little more than 5% 
growth in real per capita terms) is unlikely (Ref A). 
 
...But Not Sufficient 
--------------------- 
 
14.  (SBU) While economic expansion is essential for higher incomes, 
poverty alleviation in the Philippines has been less responsive to 
income growth than in many developing economies.  The country's 
"growth elasticity" -- the ratio of the rate of poverty reduction to 
the rate of income growth -- is roughly half those of China, 
Indonesia, and Thailand's.  In other developing countries, there has 
been a very strong connection between poverty reduction and rural 
development, infrastructure (particularly roads, transport, and 
power), and education and health -- unfortunately, all areas where 
the Philippines has severely under-invested. 
 
15.  (U) The need to improve rural incomes and boost the 
productivity of the agricultural sector -- which employs nearly 40% 
of the Philippine work force in the generation of only 17% of GDP -- 
has been receiving much attention due to the ongoing global food 
crisis.  Roughly two-thirds of workers supporting the poorest 30% of 
Philippine families are employed in the agricultural sector. 
 
Political Economy of Poverty 
---------------------------- 
 
16.  (SBU) The Philippine economy suffers from low competitiveness 
and high corruption, resulting in one of the lowest investment rates 
in the region and hampering sustained high growth and job creation. 
Implementation of reforms to liberalize the Philippine economy and 
promote greater competition has been limited by strong resistance 
from vested interests.  The significant convergence between economic 
and political power supports an entrenched economic elite.  High 
levels of corruption affect the predictability of the policy regime, 
put in question the enforceability of contracts, and constrain 
constrained the delivery of vital infrastructure and social services 
necessary for more growth and for pro-poor policies. 
 
17.  (SBU) The Philippines Congress is currently debating another 
extension to the country's 40-year-long process of agrarian reform 
that has resulted in a nation of small, unproductive landholdings. 
Limited in their ability to transfer their property rights, land 
reform beneficiaries are unable to access commercial credit, with 
many forced to borrow from informal lenders at usurious rates. 
Remaining large agricultural landholders have no incentive to invest 
in property which is still subject to expropriation.  A 
non-functional land titling system means that most small landowners 
and agrarian reform beneficiaries in particular, do not have clear 
title to their land, further discouraging investments in the rural 
sector and making it difficult for small borrowers to access credit 
from formal credit institutions. 
 
Global Food Crisis Expected to Worsen Hunger/Poverty 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
 
18.  (U) Surging rice and food prices will inevitably push even more 
Filipinos into hunger and poverty and    international experts have 
already warned that the Philippines likely will be among the hardest 
hit in the region by soaring prices of food grains.  Food carries a 
heavy weight (50%) in the Philippine consumer price basket and rice, 
in turn, makes up about a quarter of food expenditures.  Food 
expenses eat up even more of the budgets of the country's 30% 
poorest families - 60%-70%.  Rice is especially critical for the 
more than 12 million Filipinos already subsisting below 
government-estimated food thresholds who depend mainly on the staple 
for daily sustenance. 
 
MANILA 00001050  004 OF 004 
 
 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
19.  (SBU) The reforms necessary to combat poverty in the 
Philippines are widely agreed upon by economists, development 
professionals and international financial institutions.  However, 
they have proven incredibly difficult to implement in the face of 
deeply entrenched interests and a political system controlled by 
those interests.  Our continuing policy reform and advocacy efforts 
focus on issues which we assess to be ripe for change and are 
implemented by working with Philippine institutions to build a 
consensus and lobby for that change.  This is slow, difficult work, 
but is the only way we see of reducing poverty here. 
 
Kenney